DOCSLIB.ORG

ARMOR, September-October 1999 Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ARMOR, September-October 1999 Edition Saddle Up... Tonight We Ride Platoon Leading 101 is possibly one of the toughest of teaching leadership, but anyone who hopes to become courses our Army has to offer. I doubt few survive the a better or more effective leader must begin by examining course unscathed. Wrong turns, missed LDs, bright ideas his failures with a critical and objective eye, as Crandall gone awry, and other embarrassments mark the course (and certainly all leadership guides) advocate. for young platoon leaders as they master their craft. Re- Of course, there are a couple of prerequisites for this counted through the years, the stories take on epic pro- technique to succeed. It won’t work in a “zero-defect envi- portions. Recently, I bumped into a member of my first ronment” where a single mistake dooms or damages a platoon who recounted, in vivid detail, an unfortunate inci- career. You must also be willing to admit your mistake and dent that involved me slaving a tank (it’s amazing how take responsibility for it. Too often, instead of admitting an much voltage the human body can take). error, we seek to spin, rationalize, or explain it away. In this issue, Captain Douglas Crandall confesses the When confronted with the evidence of an adulterous affair sins he committed as a new platoon leader — they look and the prospect of divorce recently, an aging rock star familiar. Crandall’s apprehensions, concerns, and mis- shifted the blame to a disease he suffers from — he’s a takes are not new. Generations of platoon leaders have sex addict. “Mistakes were made.” “There was no control- made the same mistakes, wrestled the same demons, ling legal authority.” Does anyone accept blame or re- and asked themselves the same questions: “How do I sponsibility anymore? Admit the error, accept responsibil- prove myself to the platoon?” “How do I tell a platoon ity and learn from it — good advice for everyone. sergeant as old as my father what to do, especially when Sure, there are mistakes one should not recover from. he has been doing it for 16 years?” Good lieutenants an- And I am not advocating “a get out of jail free card” for swer the tough questions, prove themselves, and move young leaders; rather, that we keep in mind the process on to executive officer jobs or to the scout and support and transformation new platoon leaders go through and platoons. allocate the room to grow while providing the time and Crandall mentions FM 22-100, Leadership, in his article effort necessary to AAR them on their adventures. and adds that books on leadership and the vaunted FM In closing, I’d like to point out that several of the articles offered precious few “lessons upon which to draw,” for his in this issue highlight the importance of teamwork in purposes. It occurs to me that we are literally besieged mounted warfare. Inside the cover, you’ll find a piece on with the opportunities to learn leadership. We have FM the Falklands that demonstrates the importance of the 22-100, we have numerous periodicals which frequently combined arms team in that conflict; Major Kevin Marcus devote entire issues to the topic, we have writing contests, writes about AC/RC assignments and illustrates another awards, departments and faculty whose stated mission is key partnership; the development of the tank-infantry team the pedagogy of leadership, and there are hundreds of is detailed by Captain J.L. Mudd; and our brothers in the books written by experts, yet this young officer points out Engineer and Air Defense community weigh in with advice the most critical tool for him in learning to lead his platoon on how we can fight better as a combined arms team. was simply examining his failures and learning from his mistakes. Not to disparage those engaged in the science — D2 By Order of the Secretary of the Army: Official: ERIC K. SHINSEKI JOEL B. HUDSON General, United States Army Administrative Assistant to the Chief of Staff Secretary of the Army 9919301 The Professional Development Bulletin of the Armor Branch PB 17-99-5 Editor-in-Chief Features MAJ DAVE DAIGLE 7 Tips on Being a Platoon Leader by Captain Douglas B. Crandall Managing Editor 9 The 2nd Parachute Battalion’s War in the Falklands JON T. CLEMENS by Captain Daniel T. Head 13 AC/RC Assignments: One Officer’s Perspective by Major Kevin B. Marcus Commandant 15 Development of the American Tank-Infantry Team MG B. B. BELL During World War II in Africa and Europe by Captain J. L. Mudd 23 From Warrior to Logistician ARMOR (ISSN 0004-2420) is published bi- by Captain John D. Fio Rito monthly by the U.S. Army Armor Center, 4401 26 Three Tanks Featured in Russian Arms Show Vine Grove Road, Fort Knox, KY 40121. by Colonel James H. Nunn and Lieutenant Colonel John C. Paulson Disclaimer: The information contained in AR- 30 Engineer Basics, Some Rules to Improve Mobility and Countermobility MOR represents the professional opinions of by Captain Wayne Skill the authors and does not necessarily reflect 37 Employing the Bradley Stinger Platoon in Support of Task Force Operations the official Army or TRADOC position, nor by Captain Douglas J. Waddingham does it change or supersede any information presented in other official Army publications. 39 Using Flag Signals to Speed Combat Casualty Evacuation by Major Joseph M. Nolan Official distribution is limited to one copy for each armored brigade headquarters, armored 41 The JRTC and Light/Heavy Integration: Defensive Operations cavalry regiment headquarters, armor battalion by First Sergeant Paul E. Thompson Jr. headquarters, armored cavalry squadron head- 44 New Ideas for Armor Company Maintenance Plans quarters, reconnaissance squadron headquar- by Captain Paul J. Taylor ters, armored cavalry troop, armor company, and motorized brigade headquarters of the 47 Fire Support: Killing System or Battlefield Shaper? United States Army. In addition, Army libraries, by Robert Doughty Army and DOD schools, HQ DA and MACOM 48 The First Lieutenants to Korea Program staff agencies with responsibility for armored, by Captain Ron MacKay direct fire, ground combat systems, organiza- 49 STRAC XXI — Budgeting the Bullets: The Master Gunners’ Concerns tions, and the training of personnel for such by Sergeant First Class David Cooley organizations may request two copies by sending a request to the editor-in-chief. 51 The Graphical Spot Report by Captain Brandon K. Herl Authorized Content: ARMOR will print only those materials for which the U.S. Army Armor 53 A Technique to Get Organized and Manage Your Career Center has proponency. That proponency by Captain Christopher H. Engen includes: all armored, direct-fire ground com- 54 Tactical Vignette 99-4: “Trouble for the Redball Express – Rear Area Security” bat systems that do not serve primarily as infantry carriers; all weapons used exclusively 55 Solution to Tactical Vignette 99-3: “Screen in a Snowstorm” in these systems or by CMF 19-series enlisted 58 Review of Camp Colt to Desert Storm: The History of the U.S. Armored Forces soldiers; any miscellaneous items of equip- by Gunnery Sergeant Leo J. Daugherty ment which armor and armored cavalry organ- Back T-80U Russian Main Battle Tank Poster izations use exclusively; training for all SC Cover Threat Branch, Directorate of Force Developments 12A, 12B, and 12C officers and for all CMF- 19-series enlisted soldiers; and information concerning the training, logistics, history, and Departments leadership of armor and armored cavalry units at the brigade/regiment level and below, to 2 Contacts 6 Driver’s Seat include Threat units at those levels. 3 Letters 60 Reviews 5 Commander’s Hatch Material may be reprinted, provided credit is given to ARMOR and to the author, except where copyright is indicated. Periodicals Postage paid at Fort Knox, KY, and additional mailing offices. Postmaster: Send address changes to Editor, ARMOR, ATTN: ATZK-TDM, Fort Knox, KY 40121-5210. Distribution Restriction: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. September-October 1999, Vol. CVIII, No. 5 USPS 467-970 Directory — Points of Contact DSN – 464-XXXX Commercial – (502) 624-XXXX ARMOR Editorial Offices U.S. Army Armor Center Editor-in-Chief Commanding General (ATZK-CG) MAJ Dave Daigle 2249 MG B. B. Bell 2121 E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] Managing Editor Deputy Commanding General (ATZK-DCG) Jon T. Clemens 2249 BG R. Steven Whitcomb 7555 E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] Editor Chief of Staff (ATZK-CS) Vivian Oertle 2610 COL Frank J. Gehrki III 1101 E-mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] Production Assistant Command Sergeant Major (ATZK-CSM) Mary Hager 2610 CSM David L. Lady 4952 E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] Staff Illustrator Directorate of Force Development (ATZK-FD) Mr. Jody Harmon 2610 COL Joe Hughes 5050 E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] Directorate of Training and Doctrine Development (ATZK-TD) COL Matthew L. Smith 8247 U.S. Army Armor School E-Mail: [email protected] TRADOC System Manager for Force XXI (ATZK-XXI) Director, Armor School (ATSB-DAS) COL Brett H. Weaver 4009 COL Richard P. Geier 1050 E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] TRADOC System Manager for Abrams (ATZK-TS) Armor School Sergeant Major (ATSB-CSM) COL James H. Nunn 7955 CSM Carl E. Christian 7091 E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] Mounted Maneuver Battlespace Battle Lab (ATZK-MW) NCO Academy (ATSB-NC) COL Richard T.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Training Soldiers and Becoming a Strategist in Peace and War
    Cardinal Point: An Oral History — Training Soldiers and Becoming a Strategist in Peace and War. by General Paul F. Gorman Cardinal Point, Virginia 2010 - 2011 Published by Combat Studies Institute GENERAL PAUL F. GORMAN Cardinal Point: An Oral History — Training Soldiers and Becoming a Strategist in Peace and War. CSI Press Publications cover a variety of military topics. The views expressed in this CSI Press Publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense. ii Editor’s Introduction to the Oral History of General Paul Francis Gorman, U.S.A. Retired The oral history that follows is based on five interviews conducted with General (Retired) Paul F. Gorman by Lieutenant Colonel Robert P. Reddy, Mr Richard Swain, and Mr. Michael Starry. The Reddy interview was conducted as a student project at the Army War College during Academic Year 1990-91.1 Reddy inquired about General Gorman’s early years, his experience in various professional schools, and particularly, General Gorman’s command of the 1st Battalion, 26th Infantry, ‘Blue Spaders’ in the First Infantry Division in Vietnam. Four additional interviews were conducted by Mr. Swain and Mr. Starry between October 2010 and April 2011 in the midst of the vineyards at General Gorman’s home at Cardinal Point near Afton, Virginia. Midway in the conduct of the more recent interviews, the participants made a decision to integrate all the interview material into a single chronological narrative that could provide General Gorman’s contextual overview for the electronic archive.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Training Handbook of the Browning Automatic Rifle Model Of
    CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICAL, TRAINING HANDBOOK OF THE BROWNING AUTOMATIC RIFLE MODEL OF 1918 (Air Cooled) PREPARED AT THE INFANTRY SCHOOL OF ARMS FORT SILL, OKLAHOMA WAR PLANS DIVISION SEPTEMBER, 1918 WAR DEPARTMENT Document No. 853 Office of the Adjutant General WAR DEPARTMENT Document No. 853 Office of the Adjutant General. WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, September 7, 1918. The following confidential pamphlet, entitled "Technical Train- ing Handbook of the Browning Automatic Rifle, Model of 1918" (technical training series, prepared at the Infantry School of Arms, Fort Sill, Oklahoma), is published for the information and guidance of all concerned. (062.1 A. G. O.) BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF WAR I PEYTON C. MARCH, General, Chief of Staff. OFFICIAL : PETER C. HARRIS, Acting Adjutant General^ TABLE OF CONTENTS PART ONE METHOD OF INSTRUCTION (MECHANISM) PAGE Introduction 6 Organization of Class 7 Subjects 8 Detailed Method of Instruction 8 Regulations Concerning Handling the Rifle 9 PART TWO SCHEDULE OF INSTRUCTION (MECHANISM) General Remarks 1 1 Lesson I. Nomenclature, Stripping, Assembling II Notes on Lesson I 12 Name 12 Type 12 Ammunition 13 Cooling System 13 General Data 13 Sequence of Stripping 14 Notes on Stripping 14 To Remove Firing Pin Without Stripping Gun 15 Sequence of Assembling 16 Notes on Assembling 16 Lesson II. Stripping and Assembling Blindfolded 17 Lesson III. Stripping and Assembling Trigger Mechanism. 17 Notes on Trigger Mechanism 17 Sequence of Stripping 17 Assembling Trigger Mechanism j8 Lesson IV. Magazines 19 Notes on Magazine 19 Lesson V. Spare Parts 20 Notes on Spare Parts 20 3 664364 Lesson VI. Functioning 20 Notes on Functioning 22 General Remarks 22 First Phase 22 Action of gas 22 The slide 23 Unlocking 23 Withdrawal of firing pin 24 Extraction 24 Ejection 24 Termination of first phase 24 Second Phase 25 Action of recoil spring 25 Feeding 25 Locking 26 Priming the cartridge 26 Termination of second phase 26 Action of Buffer 27 Lesson VII.
    [Show full text]
  • LIBERTY UNIVERSITY Master's Thesis the M26 Pershing
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY Master’s Thesis The M26 Pershing: America’s Forgotten Tank - Developmental and Combat History Author : Reader : Supervisor : Robert P. Hanger Dr. Christopher J. Smith Dr. David L. Snead A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master’s of Arts In the Liberty University Department of History May 11, 2018 Abstract The M26 tank, nicknamed the “General Pershing,” was the final result of the Ordnance Department’s revolutionary T20 series. It was the only American heavy tank to be fielded during the Second World War. Less is known about this tank, mainly because it entered the war too late and in too few numbers to impact events. However, it proved a sufficient design – capable of going toe-to-toe with vaunted German armor. After the war, American tank development slowed and was reduced mostly to modernization of the M26 and component development. The Korean War created a sudden need for armor and provided the impetus for further development. M26s were rushed to the conflict and demonstrated to be decisive against North Korean armor. Nonetheless, the principle role the tank fulfilled was infantry support. In 1951, the M26 was replaced by its improved derivative, the M46. Its final legacy was that of being the foundation of America’s Cold War tank fleet. Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..1 Chapter 1. Development of the T26 …………………………………………………..………..10 Chapter 2. The M26 in Action in World War II …………...…………………………………40 Chapter 3. The Interwar Period ……………………………………………………………….63 Chapter 4. The M26 in Korea ………………………………………………………………….76 The Invasion………………………………………………………...………77 Intervention…………………………………………………………………81 The M26 Enters the War……………………………………………………85 The M26 in the Anti-Tank Role…………………………………………….87 Chapter 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Philip Wilcocks CB DSC DL ‒ Onboarding Officers Super
    Philip Wilcocks CB DSC DL – OnBoarding Officers Super NED Joining the Royal Navy in 1971, Philip Wilcocks graduated from the University of Wales in 1976 and assumed his first command of the minesweeper HMS STUBBINGTON in 1978. Qualifying as a Principal Warfare Officer in 1981, he served in the frigate HMS AMBUSCADE as Operations Officer, which included the Falklands conflict in 1982. Following his promotion to Commander, he assumed command of the destroyer HMS GLOUCESTER in 1990. The ‘Fighting G’ fought in Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm when his ship destroyed 7 enemy warships and a Silkworm missile targeted against the battleship USS MISSOURI. He was subsequently awarded the Distinguished Service Cross for gallantry and sustained leadership under fire. In 1998, he assumed command of HMS LIVERPOOL as Captain 3rd Destroyer Squadron. While Director of Naval Operations, in 2000 he was the Crisis Director for UK Operations in support of the UN in Sierra Leone. In 2001, he formed and then commanded the Royal Navy’s largest training organisation the Maritime Warfare School responsible for a budget of £120M and a capital build programme of £30M. On promotion to Rear Admiral in 2004, he became Deputy Commander of Joint Operations at the UK’s Permanent Joint HQ; as well as operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, he was the Crisis Director for the UK response to the 2005 Tsunami disaster. In this appointment he had oversight of an annual budget of £540M and a £1.5Bn PFI contract. Following a short tour as Flag Officer Scotland, Northern England and Northern Ireland and Flag Officer Reserves, he became Chief of Staff to Commander-in-Chief, Fleet assuming responsibility for generating current and future UK maritime capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the American Tank-Infantry Team During World War II in Africa and Europe
    Art by Jody Harmon Development of the American Tank-Infantry Team During World War II in Africa and Europe by Captain J. L. Mudd The American tank-infantry team was to destroy antitank weapons, bunkers, and tions, and its weight ranged from 33 to the key maneuver element that led to the unarmored or lightly-armored vehicles.5 almost 36 tons. Typically, the tank car- overwhelming number of tactical suc- When the United States Army entered ried a 75-mm gun, but many were later cesses enjoyed by the United States in the World War II, the two main tanks in its fitted with a 76-mm higher velocity can- Second World War.1 However, this win- arsenal were the M3 light tank and the non. It bristled with bow and coaxial .30- ning combination of men and machines M3 medium tank.6 The Light Tank, M3 caliber machine guns and a flexible tur- had developed throughout the course of Series weighed approximately 14-16 ret-mounted Browning .50 caliber ma- the war, and included a number of varia- tons, depending on the model, and was chine gun for antiaircraft use. Armor on tions based on the theater and areas armed with a 37-mm cannon and up to the turret front was 3.75 inches in effec- within each theater. Original develop- five .30-caliber machine guns. Its thickest tive thickness, while the hull front was ment came from training and lessons effective armor was 1.75 inches on the effectively up to four inches thick.10 learned in the decades between the two turret front and 3 inches on the hull front.
    [Show full text]
  • T14 Assault Tank the New T14 Assault Tank Gives British Infantry Tank Battalions Their First 75Mm Gun Tank
    REPLACING StaNdaRD EQUIPMENT IN BRITISH SERVICE T14 ASSAULT TANK The new T14 assault tank gives British infantry tank battalions their first 75mm gun tank. OON Any British company may replace all Infantry Tank Platoons equipped with Churchill tanks with DEVELOPMENT at Assault Tank Platoons. If it is an Infantry Tank Company it must also purchase all tanks in When America entered the war in late 1941 they and the British immediately got together to the Company HQ as T14 assault tanks for 135 points per tank. L consider tank designs. The Americans learned from the British tank combat experience, while the P British examined American tank designs to see how they fit their requirements. Subaltern In September 1941 the British had expressed interest in a heavier tank after their experiences ASSAULT TANK PLatOON NK in the desert and teething problems with their new Churchill tank. At the same time the US The assault tank platoons have won the Subaltern A Ordnance Department had been advocating the adoption of heavier tanks for the US Army. The T14 confidence of the infantry they support. T assault tank was seen as the solution for both these needs. T Assault Tank Platoons are rated as: The US Ordnance Department started design work on a tank that shared many features with the Confident Trained M6 heavy tank, but incorporated British requirements. With design work on the new M4 Sherman UL Command A medium tank nearing completion, the design shared many features of this tank. The new tank had PLatooN T14 assault tank the transmission of the M4 Sherman and the standard Ford GAZ tank engine.
    [Show full text]
  • Exmoor Tanks Pack
    North Hill in World War II Minehead, Somerset SCHOOLS RESOURCE PACK for Key Stages 2 & 3 This pack has been created by Sarah Butterworth and Caroline Barnes of Emerald Ant C.I.C. Emerald Ant is dedicated to engaging communities in their local history and heritage through exciting arts projects and interactive education. Community Interest Company 9608594. www.emeraldant.com Contents >> ACTIVITY >> >> CURRICULUM AREA >> 1. Tank Missions and Top Trumps Science / Engineering, Geography, History 2. Designing a Tank Training Ground Art & Design, Maths, Geography, History 3. Camouflage Design Art & Design, Geography 4. Radar Station: A Very Hush Hush Building Language & Literacy, Creative Writing, History 5. Radar Detection: Creating an Invisible Plane Art & Design, History, Science Credits Cover Painting by Year 5 pupils at Minehead Middle School. Photograph credit Caroline Barnes. Top Trump cards >> Crusader Miller, David – An Illustrated Guide to World War II Tanks and Fighting Vehicles, 1981 CRUSADER MARK III - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ACrusader_tank_III.jpg http://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/gb/Cruiser-MkVI_Crusader.php >> Stuart M3 Image - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AM3-Stuart-Fort-Knox-1.jpg >> Sherman Image - “M4 Sherman tank - Flickr - Joost J. Bakker IJmuiden” by Joost J. Bakker - M4 Sherman tank. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/ File:M4_Sherman_tank_-_Flickr_-_Joost_J._Bakker_IJmuiden.jpg#/media/File:M4_Sherman_ tank_-_Flickr_-_Joost_J._Bakker_IJmuiden.jpg Miller, David – An Illustrated Guide to World War II Tanks and Fighting Vehicles, 1981 >> Churchill Infantry Tank Image: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/42/Tanks_and_Afvs_of_the_British_ Army_1939-45_KID1265.jpg Activity 2 Legend reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Warfare in a Mature Precision-Strike Regime
    MARITIME WARFARE IN A MATURE PRECISION-STRIKE REGIME ANDREW F. KREPINEVICH 2014 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA) is an independent, non- partisan policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking and debate about national security strategy and investment options. CSBA’s analysis focuses on key questions related to existing and emerging threats to U.S. national security, and its goal is to enable policymakers to make informed decisions on matters of strategy, security policy, and resource allocation. © 2014 Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. All rights reserved. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Andrew Krepinevich is President of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. He assumed this position in 1993, following a 21-year career in the U.S. Army. Dr. Krepinevich has served in the Department of Defense’s Office of Net Assessment, and on the personal staff of three secretaries of defense. He has also served as a member of the National Defense Panel, the Defense Science Board Task Force on Joint Experimentation, the Joint Forces Command Advisory Board, and the Defense Policy Board. He currently serves on the Chief of Naval Operations' (CNO's) Advisory Board and on the Army Special Operations Command's Advisory Board. Dr. Krepinevich frequently contributes to print and broadcast media. He has lectured before a wide range of professional and academic audiences, and has served as a consultant on mil- itary affairs for many senior government officials, including several secretaries of defense, the CIA’s National Intelligence Council, and all four military services.
    [Show full text]
  • {PDF} French Tanks of the Great War: Development, Tactics And
    FRENCH TANKS OF THE GREAT WAR: DEVELOPMENT, TACTICS AND OPERATIONS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Dr. Tim Gale | 256 pages | 05 Aug 2016 | Pen & Sword Books Ltd | 9781473823501 | English | South Yorkshire, United Kingdom French Tanks of the Great War: Development, Tactics and Operations PDF Book It was utilised as far away as in China, during the Chinese Civil wars, and versions of the tank were used both against and by the Japanese during the invasion of China. Namespaces Article Talk. The story will be fascinating reading for anyone who is interested in the Great War, the French army, military innovation and the history of armored warfare. English French German Italian Spanish. The Saint-Chamond tanks, first deployed on 5 May, proved to be so badly designed that they were unable to cross the first line of German trenches. The last 35 new battle tanks were in ordered by Cyprus and the last new variant vehicles, a batch of twenty GCTs, in by France. Chlorine gas attacked the eyes and respiratory system; mustard gas did the same but also caused blistering on any exposed skin. In December , the influential Colonel Estienne made the Supreme Command very enthusiastic about the idea of creating an armoured force based on these vehicles; strong Army support for tanks would be a constant during the decades to come. De Gaulle used it to delegitimize cooperation with the Vichy regime. Submarines could strike unseen from beneath the waves with torpedoes but also surfaced to use their deck gun. Continue Shopping View Basket. The resulting disorder and breakdown of most of its S 35s rendered this unit, the most powerful of all Allied divisions, impotent; it was defeated by the German 5th Panzerdivision on 17 May.
    [Show full text]
  • Increasing Small Arms Lethality in Afghanistan: Taking Back the Infantry Half-Kilometer
    Increasing Small Arms Lethality in Afghanistan: Taking Back the Infantry Half-Kilometer A Monograph By Major Thomas P. Ehrhart United States Army School of Advanced Military Studies United States Army Command and General Staff College Fort Leavenworth, Kansas AY 2009 Approved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202- 4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) 30-11-2009 SAMS Monograph January 2009 - December 2009 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER Increasing small arms lethality in Afghanistan: Taking back the infantry half- 5b. GRANT NUMBER kilometer 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER MAJ Thomas P Ehrhart, United States Army 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Accidents 1945-1988, Neptune Papers No. 3
    -- Neptune Papers -- Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945 - 1988 by William M. Arkin and Joshua Handler Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. June 1989 Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945-1988 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nuclear Weapons Accidents......................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Reactor Accidents ........................................................................................................... 7 Submarine Accidents .................................................................................................................... 9 Dangers of Routine Naval Operations....................................................................................... 12 Chronology of Naval Accidents: 1945 - 1988........................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Sources and Acknowledgements........................................................................ 73 Appendix B: U.S. Ship Type Abbreviations ............................................................................ 76 Table 1: Number of Ships by Type Involved in Accidents, 1945 - 1988................................ 78 Table 2: Naval Accidents by Type
    [Show full text]
  • How the Us Must Respond to China And
    AMERICAN SEA POWER AND GREAT POWER COMPETITION: HOW THE U.S. MUST RESPOND TO CHINA AND RUSSIA'S GROWING NAVAL CAPABILITY by Richard V. C. Busick A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Government Baltimore, Maryland May 2020 © 2020 Richard Busick All Rights Reserved Abstract American sea power has diminished significantly since the end of the Cold War. The loss of sea power relative to rising great power competitors risks the ability of the United States to adequately advance or defend its national interests in war or in peace. The current rise of China as a sea power and resurgence of Russia as a growing undersea naval threat pose new challenges for the U.S. Navy. The purpose of this research was to determine if the Navy was prepared to meet this challenge and if not, to identify deficiencies and make recommendations for improvement. This research was conducted using a historical case study approach in which several eras were reviewed and analyzed for their lessons on sealift and naval power and their implications for today. World War II, the Tanker War of the 1980s, and the British Falkland Islands campaign were studied in regard to their implication on sealift and maritime logistics. World War II, the latter part of the Cold War, and the era of the Global War on Terror were then studied for lesson related to naval combat power. The study concluded that the United States was not prepared for the challenges of great power competition.
    [Show full text]