DOCSLIB.ORG

The Role of Macrophytes in Wetland Ecosystems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Role of Macrophytes in Wetland Ecosystems Invited Review Paper J. Ecol. Field Biol. 34(4): 333-345, 2011 Journal of Ecology and Field Biology The role of macrophytes in wetland ecosystems Eliška Rejmánková* Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 956 16, USA Abstract Aquatic macrophytes, often also called hydrophytes, are key components of aquatic and wetland ecosystems. This re- view is to briefly summarizes various macrophyte classifications, and covers numerous aspects of macrophytes’ role in wetland ecosystems, namely in nutrient cycling. The most widely accepted macrophyte classification differentiates be- tween freely floating macrophytes and those attached to the substrate, with the attached, or rooted macrophytes further divided into three categories: floating-leaved, submerged and emergent. Biogeochemical processes in the water column and sediments are to a large extent influenced by the type of macrophytes. Macrophytes vary in their biomass produc- tion, capability to recycle nutrients, and impacts on the rhizosphere by release of oxygen and organic carbon, as well as their capability to serve as a conduit for methane. With increasing eutrophication, the species diversity of wetland mac- rophytes generally declines, and the speciose communities are being replaced by monoculture-forming strong competi- tors. A similar situation often happens with invasive species. The roles of macrophytes and sediment microorganisms in wetland ecosystems are closely connected and should be studied simultaneously rather than in isolation. Key words: eutrophication, habitat, invasive species, macrophyte, methane, nitrogen, phosphorus, resorption, wetland INTRODUCTION Aquatic macrophytes, often also called hydrophytes, for their direct contributions to human societies by pro- are key components of aquatic and wetland ecosystems. viding food, biomass, and building materials (Costanza et As primary producers, they are at the base of herbivorous al. 1997, Engelhardt and Ritchie 2001, Egertson et al. 2004, and detritivorous food chains, providing food to inver- Bornette and Puijalon 2011). tebrates, fish and birds, and organic carbon for bacteria. Good knowledge of the functions of aquatic macro- Their stems, roots and leaves serve as a substrate for pe- phytes in wetlands and shallow lake ecosystems is critical riphyton, and a shelter for numerous invertebrates and for understanding the basic ecosystem processes. It is also different stages of fish, amphibians and reptiles (Timms important for numerous applied issues such as wetland and Moss 1984, Dvořák 1996). Biogeochemical processes restoration, wastewater treatment, and management of in the water column and sediments are to a large extent invasive species (Lavoie 2010, Casanova 2011). influenced by the presence/absence and a type of mac- The goal of this review is to briefly summarize various rophytes, and macrophytes can also have a profound im- macrophyte classifications, and cover in more details nu- pact on water movement and sediment dynamics in wa- merous aspects of the macrophytes’ role in aquatic and ter bodies. Some macrophytes are of major importance wetland ecosystems. Open Access http://dx.doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2011.044 Received 24 October 2011, Accepted 25 October 2011 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative *Corresponding Author Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, E-mail: [email protected] distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work Tel: +1-530-752-5433 is properly cited. pISSN: 1975-020X eISSN: 2093-4521 Copyright © The Ecological Society of Korea 333 http://jefb.org J. Ecol. Field Biol. 34(4): 333-345, 2011 DEFINITION AND CLASSIFICATION Ludwigia spp., Myriophyllum aquaticum, Hydrocotyle spp., Nasturtium aquaticum, Alternanthera phyloxeroi- The diverse and heterogeneous group of macrophytes des) (Rejmánková 1992). has posed a challenge for definition and classification. “Floating-leaved macrophytes” represented by genera Macrophytes can be loosely defined as all forms of mac- such as Nymphaea, Victoria, or Brasenia, typically occur roscopic aquatic vegetation visible by naked eye. This is at water depths from ~0.5 to 3 m, they have long petioles in contrast to microphytes, i.e., microscopic forms of with leaves adapted to mechanical stress and reproduc- aquatic plants, such as planktonic and periphytic algae. tive organs floating or aerial. The fact that macrophytes live in aquatic environments, “Submersed macrophytes” (Chara, Elodea, Cabomba, at least seasonally, makes them different from terrestrial Utricularia, Myriophyllum) are most adapted to the live plants that don’t tolerate flooded environments. The in aquatic environment. The depth distribution of an- macrophytes include taxonomically very diverse repre- giosperms is limited to about 10 m, the representatives sentatives: macroalgae (e.g., Chara and Nitella), mosses of other taxonomic groups occur at all depths within the and liverworts (e.g., Sphagnum and Riccia), and vascu- photic zone. They often have elongated, ribbon-like or lar plants. Vascular plants represent the largest group of dissected leaves, and aerial, floating or (rarely) submersed macrophytes including aquatic ferns (Azolla, Salvinia), reproductive organs. Gymnosperms (rare) and Angiosperms, both mono- and “Freely floating macrophytes” Eichhornia( , Lemna, Sal- dicots. Altogether, aquatic macrophytes are represented vinia) often have highly reduced morphology and duck- in seven plant divisions: Cyanobacteria, Chlorophyta, weeds (former Lemnaceae, now Araceae) are the smallest Rhodophyta, Xanthophyta, Bryophyta, Pteridophyta and angiosperm with the whole plant in genus Wolfia being Spermatophyta, consisting of at least 41 orders and 103 only about 1 mm across (Sculthorpe 1967). Their leaves families (for details see Chambers et al. 2008). It is impor- and reproductive organs are aerial and/or floating and tant to keep in mind that the evolution of angiosperms since they are not rooted in the sediments, their nutrient proceeded in terrestrial environments and when some of absorption completely from water. them returned to aquatic environment they had to evolve Besides the Hutchinson’s ecological classification of various adaptations. macrophytes, several authors attempted to classify mac- There are a number of classical treaties on aquatic rophytes into functional types (Boutin and Keddy 1993, macrophytes (Gessner 1955, Sculthorpe 1967, Hutchin- Brock and Casanova 1997, Weiher et al. 1998). Plant func- son 1975, Cook 1996) some of them presenting quite elab- tional types can be defined as sets of plants exhibiting orated classification schemes (Hejný 1960, Den Hartog similar responses to environmental conditions and hav- and Segal 1964). Hutchinson (1975) attempted to consoli- ing similar effects on the dominant ecosystem processes date various life-form based classifications (grouped by (Diaz and Cabido 1997, Lavorel et al. 1997). Grouping the relation of plants to water level and substratum) and plants based on their functional traits became increas- growth-form based classifications (grouped by structural ingly important when the need for understanding the similarity and relations to the physical environment) into link between plant species richness and ecosystem func- a unified “ecological” classification. Although his product tioning has emerged as one of the central questions in is quite detailed, its main four categories remain the most ecology during the past decade (Bouchard et al. 2007). A widely accepted macrophyte classification until today simplification from species to functional groups is also (Wetzel 1975, Denny 1985). It differentiates between freely attractive for predictive modeling of vegetation respons- floating macrophytes and those attached to the substrate, es to human-induced changes in the environment, e.g., with the attached, or rooted macrophytes further divided climate change (Nygaard and Ejrnaes 2004). However, into three categories: floating-leaved, submerged and despite different classification schemes and terminolo- emergent. Brief description of the 4 categories follows: gies there is no single commonly accepted functional “Emergent macrophytes” typically occur in the upper type classification useful for all studies whether they are littoral zone at a depth of about 1-1.5 m, their root and rhi- concerned with wetland or terrestrial plants (Sieben et al. zome systems are often adapted to permanently anaero- 2010). It seems that plant functional groups are being de bic sediments and they have aerial reproductive organs. novo defined for each individual study depending on the This group includes rather diverse types of plants that can study aims (Rejmánková et al. 2011). be further categorized into two groups: 1) erect emergents Previous assessments of macrophyte diversity between (e.g., Typha, Phragmites) and 2) creeping emergents (e.g., temperate and tropical regions indicated that the rich- http://dx.doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2011.044 334 The role of macrophytes in wetland ecosystems ROLE: SUN ENERGY PRIMARY PRODUCTION CO2 uptake H2O O2 Nutrient uptake (resorption) PHOTOSYNTHESIS Transpiration RESPIRATION O2 release CO2 Org. C exudates Conduit for gases DECOMPOSITION CH4 Nutrient release Rhizosphere related processes N, P Enzyme production HABITAT N, P ORGANIC MATER O2 C CH4 Fig. 2. Examples of annual aboveground
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Otanewainuku ED (Report Prepared on 13 August 2013)
    1 NZFRI collection wish list for Otanewainuku ED (Report prepared on 13 August 2013) Fern Ally Isolepis cernua Lycopodiaceae Isolepis inundata Lycopodium fastigiatum Isolepis marginata Lycopodium scariosum Isolepis pottsii Psilotaceae Isolepis prolifera Tmesipteris lanceolata Lepidosperma australe Lepidosperma laterale Gymnosperm Schoenoplectus pungens Cupressaceae Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani Chamaecyparis lawsoniana Schoenus apogon Cupressus macrocarpa Schoenus tendo Pinaceae Uncinia filiformis Pinus contorta Uncinia gracilenta Pinus patula Uncinia rupestris Pinus pinaster Uncinia scabra Pinus ponderosa Hemerocallidaceae Pinus radiata Dianella nigra Pinus strobus Phormium cookianum subsp. hookeri Podocarpaceae Phormium tenax Podocarpus totara var. totara Iridaceae Prumnopitys taxifolia Crocosmia xcrocosmiiflora Libertia grandiflora Monocotyledon Libertia ixioides Agapanthaceae Watsonia bulbillifera Agapanthus praecox Juncaceae Alliaceae Juncus articulatus Allium triquetrum Juncus australis Araceae Juncus conglomeratus Alocasia brisbanensis Juncus distegus Arum italicum Juncus edgariae Lemna minor Juncus effusus var. effusus Zantedeschia aethiopica Juncus sarophorus Arecaceae Juncus tenuis var. tenuis Rhopalostylis sapida Luzula congesta Asparagaceae Luzula multiflora Asparagus aethiopicus Luzula picta var. limosa Asparagus asparagoides Orchidaceae Cordyline australis x banksii Acianthus sinclairii Cordyline banksii x pumilio Aporostylis bifolia Asteliaceae Corunastylis nuda Collospermum microspermum Diplodium alobulum Commelinaceae
    [Show full text]
  • Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • EA App. K Veg Management
    DRAFT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN EXTENSION OF SAND QUARRY CLEARY BROS (BOMBO) GERROA A report prepared by KEVIN MILLS & ASSOCIATES PTY LIMITED SEPTEMBER 2006 06/04/2 DRAFT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN EXTENSION OF SAND QUARRY CLEARY BROS (BOMBO) GERROA a report prepared by KEVIN MILLS & ASSOCIATES ECOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 114 NORTH CURRAMORE ROAD JAMBEROO NSW 2533 ABN 346 816 238 93 for CLEARY BROS (BOMBO) PTY LIMITED PO BOX 210 PORT KEMBLA NSW 2505 September 2006 06/04/2 Kevin Mills & Associates Pty Limited ACN 003 441 610 as trustee for Kevin Mills & Associates Trust COPYRIGHT © Kevin Mills & Associates 2006 All intellectual property and copyright reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, 1968, no part of this report may be reproduced, transmitted, stored in a retrieval system or updated in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without written permission. Enquiries should be addressed to Kevin Mills & Associates. Kevin Mills & Associates Draft Vegetation Management Plan i Cleary Bros (Bombo) Quarry, Gerroa VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN EXTENSION OF SAND QUARRY CLEARY BROS (BOMBO) GERROA CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 2 THE PROJECT AREA .......................................................................................... 1 3 EXISTING VEGETATION AND HABITATS.........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Extinction of Mutualistic Species – an Analysis of Ornithophilous Angiosperms in New Zealand
    DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES CO-EXTINCTION OF MUTUALISTIC SPECIES An analysis of ornithophilous angiosperms in New Zealand Sandra Palmqvist Degree project for Master of Science (120 hec) with a major in Environmental Science ES2500 Examination Course in Environmental Science, 30 hec Second cycle Semester/year: Spring 2021 Supervisor: Søren Faurby - Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences Examiner: Johan Uddling - Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences “Tui. Adult feeding on flax nectar, showing pollen rubbing onto forehead. Dunedin, December 2008. Image © Craig McKenzie by Craig McKenzie.” http://nzbirdsonline.org.nz/sites/all/files/1200543Tui2.jpg Table of Contents Abstract: Co-extinction of mutualistic species – An analysis of ornithophilous angiosperms in New Zealand ..................................................................................................... 1 Populärvetenskaplig sammanfattning: Samutrotning av mutualistiska arter – En analys av fågelpollinerade angiospermer i New Zealand ................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 2. Material and methods ............................................................................................................... 7 2.1 List of plant species, flower colours and conservation status ....................................... 7 2.1.1 Flower Colours .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Fitzroy River Infrastructure Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    Not government policy Commercial in confidence Appendix 1. Vascular plant species recorded from the Lower Dawson River study area. Nomenclature according to Henderson (2002). ACANTHACEAE ARECACEAE Brunoniella australis Livistona decipiens Cabbage palm Dipteracanthus australasicus subsp. australasicus Pseuderanthemum variabile Love Flower ASCLEPIADACEAE *Asclepias curassavica Redhead cottonbush ADIANTACEAE *Cryptostegia grandiflora Rubbervine Cheilanthes sieberi Rock Fern *Gomphocarpus physocarpus Balloonbush Marsdenia viridiflora AIZOACEAE Sarcostemma viminale subsp brunonianum Caustic vine Tetragonia tetragonioides box burr Zaleya galericulata subsp. galericulata ASTERACEAE *Ageratum houstonianum Blue billygoat weed AMARANTHACEAE Bracteantha bracteata Achyranthes aspera Chaff flower *Bidens pilosa Coblers peg Alternanthera denticulata Lesser joyweed Calotis cuneata Blue burr daisy Alternanthera nana Hairy joyweed Cassinia laevis Coughbush Alternanthera nodiflora Centipeda minima var. minima Amaranthus interruptus Chrysocephalum apiculatum Yellow buttons Amaranthus viridus Green amaranth *Cirsium vulgare Spear thistle *Gomphrena celosioides Gomphrena *Conyza canadiensis Fleabane Nyssanthes diffusa Barb wire weed Cyanthillium cinereum Veronia *Emilia sonchifolia Emilia AMARYLLIDACEAE *Lactuca serriola Prickly lettuce Crinum flaccidum Murray lily Olearia sp *Parthenium hysterophorus Parthenium ANACARDIACEAE Pluchea dioscoridis Pleiogynium timorense Burdekin plum Pterocaulon redolens Toothed ragwort Pterocaulon serrulatum *Senecio lautus
    [Show full text]
  • Species List
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Rangelands, Western Australia
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • EA App. I 2005 Flora-Fauna
    OVERVIEW OF THE FLORA AND FAUNA CLEARY BROS (BOMBO) PROPERTY AT GERROA A report prepared by KEVIN MILLS & ASSOCIATES PTY LIMITED FEBRUARY 2005 05/02 OVERVIEW OF THE FLORA AND FAUNA CLEARY BROS (BOMBO) PROPERTY AT GERROA a report prepared by KEVIN MILLS & ASSOCIATES ECOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 114 NORTH CURRAMORE ROAD JAMBEROO NSW 2533 ABN 346 816 238 93 for CLEARY BROS (BOMBO) PTY LIMITED P. O. BOX 210 PORT KEMBLA NSW 2505 February 2005 05/02 Kevin Mills & Associates Pty Limited ACN 003 441 610 as trustee for Kevin Mills & Associates Trust COPYRIGHT © Kevin Mills & Associates 2005 All intellectual property and copyright reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, 1968, no part of this report may be reproduced, transmitted, stored in a retrieval system or updated in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without written permission. Enquiries should be addressed to Kevin Mills & Associates. Front cover: Panorama of the typical vegetation in the investigation area at Gerroa. This includes Swamp Oak Forest, channels lined with native wetland vegetation and extensive areas of grazing land. Kevin Mills & Associates Flora and Fauna Overview i Cleary Bros (Bombo) Property, Gerroa OVERVIEW OF THE FLORA AND FAUNA CLEARY BROS (BOMBO) PROPERTY AT GERROA CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................1 1.1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Garlon 360 Trial for the Control of Wetland Weeds
    Garlon® 360 trial for the control of wetland weeds SCIENCE FOR CONSERVATION 311 Garlon® 360 trial for the control of wetland weeds Paul Champion, Trevor James, Nicholas Singers and Kerry Bodmin SCIENCE FOR CONSERVATION 311 Published by Publishing Team Department of Conservation PO Box 10420, The Terrace Wellington 6143, New Zealand Cover: Regrowth under treated (dead) willows 2 years after treatment with Garlon® 360. Photo: Paul Champion. Science for Conservation is a scientific monograph series presenting research funded by New Zealand Department of Conservation (DOC). Manuscripts are internally and externally peer-reviewed; resulting publications are considered part of the formal international scientific literature. This report is available from the departmental website in pdf form. Titles are listed in our catalogue on the website, refer www.doc.govt.nz under Publications, then Science & technical. © Copyright September 2011, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 1177–9241 (web PDF) ISBN 978–0–478–14912–8 (web PDF) This report was prepared for publication by the Publishing Team; editing and layout by Lynette Clelland. Publication was approved by the General Manager, Research and Development Group, Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand. In the interest of forest conservation, we support paperless electronic publishing. CONTENTS Abstract 5 1. Introduction 6 2. Management of wetland and aquatic weeds with herbicides: a review of literature relevant to New Zealand 7 2.1 Herbicides used to control wetland and aquatic weeds in New Zealand 7 2.2 Triclopyr TEA 8 2.2.1 Control of woody species 8 2.2.2 Control of purple loosestrife 9 2.2.3 Control of sprawling emergent, floating-leaved and free- floating aquatic weeds 9 2.2.4 Control of submerged aquatic weeds 10 2.2.5 Tolerant species 10 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Cover Page of ERMP
    9 Existing environment—aquatic flora and fauna The proposed development allows for all rivers, streams and natural wetlands in the Project Area to be contained within conservation areas, and to be isolated from land development. This chapter describes the flora and fauna associated with surface water features within and near the Project Area. Other chapters of relevance are Chapter 5, which describes the existing and potential changes to the hydrology and water quality of these surface water features; Chapter 6, which describes the existing and potential groundwater scenarios, and effects that changes in groundwater may have on surface water; and Chapter 10, which describes the conservation strategy for the Project, potential impacts from development, and proposed management measures. 9.1 OVERVIEW Relative to other areas of Australia there is limited literature available on the aquatic systems of the Kimberley region. Lane and McComb (1988) described the wetlands of the region in broad ecological terms, and Benson (1997) identified the wetlands within the Project Area. Molluscs have been studied by Wilson and Stoddart (1979); fish have been investigated by Allen (1982), Hutchins (1981) and Larson (1995, 1996, 1999); and waterbirds have been studied by Jaensch (1994). A marine biological survey of the eastern Kimberley has been undertaken by the Western Australian Museum and the University of Western Australia (Walker et al. 1996). As described by Lane and McComb (1988), the types of natural wetland found in the Kimberley region include: · perennial or intermittent rivers (mostly freshwater); · estuaries subject to large seasonal changes in salinity brought about by the balance between seasonal intrusion of marine water, evaporation, rainfall and river discharge; · ephemeral wetlands on rock outcrops; · seasonal lakes and associated swamps.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation of the Holsworthy Military Area
    893 Vegetation of the Holsworthy Military Area Kristine French, Belinda Pellow and Meredith Henderson French, K., Pellow, B. and Henderson, M1. (Janet Cosh Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522. 1Current address — Biodiversity Survey and Research Division, NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, PO Box 1967, Hurstville, NSW 2220. Address for correspondence: Kristine French, Dept of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522. email: [email protected]) Vegetation of the Holsworthy Military Area. Cunninghamia 6(4): 893–940 Vegetation in the Holsworthy Military Area located 35 km south-west of Sydney (33°59'S 150°57'E) in the Campbelltown and Liverpool local government areas was surveyed and mapped. The data were analysed using multivariate techniques to identify significantly different floristic groups that identified distinct communities. Eight vegetation communities were identified, four on infertile sandstones and four on more fertile shales and alluviums. On more fertile soils, Melaleuca Thickets, Plateau Forest on Shale, Shale/Sandstone Transition Forests and Riparian Scrub were distinguished. On infertile soils, Gully Forest, Sandstone Woodland, Woodland/Heath Complex and Sedgelands were distinguished. We identified sets of species that characterise each community either because they are unique or because they contribute significantly to the separation of the vegetation community from other similar communities. The Holsworthy Military Area contains relatively undisturbed vegetation with low weed invasion. It is a good representation of continuous vegetation that occurs on the transition between the Woronora Plateau and the Cumberland Plain. The Plateau Forest on Shale is considered to be Cumberland Plains Woodland and together with the Shale/Sandstone Transition Forest, are endangered ecological communities under the NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics, Phylogeny and Biogeography of Juncaginaceae
    Systematics, phylogeny and biogeography of Juncaginaceae Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades „Doktor der Naturwissenschaften“ am Fachbereich Biologie der Johannes Gutenberg‐Universität Mainz Sabine von Mering geb. in Erfurt Mainz, Juni 2013 Dekan: 1. Berichterstatter: 2. Berichterstatter: Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: Triglochin maritima L. Saltmarsh in Denmark (Photo: SvM). “For there are some plants which cannot live except in wet; and again these are distinguished from one another by their fondness for different kinds of wetness; so that some grow in marshes, others in lakes, others in rivers, others even in the sea […]. Some are water plants to the extent of being submerged, while some project a little from the water; of some again the roots and a small part of the stem are under the water, but the rest of the body is altogether above it.” Theophrastus (370‐c. 285 B.C.) on aquatic plants in Enquiry into Plants (Historia Plantarum) TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1: Phylogeny, systematics, and recircumscription of Juncaginaceae – a cosmopolitan wetland family 7 CHAPTER 2: Phylogeny, biogeography and evolution of Triglochin L. (Juncaginaceae) – morphological diversification is linked to habitat shifts rather than to genetic diversification 25 CHAPTER 3: Revision of the Mediterranean and southern African Triglochin bulbosa complex (Juncaginaceae) 51 CHAPTER 4: Tetroncium and its only species T. magellanicum (Juncaginaceae): distribution, ecology and lectotypification 91 CHAPTER 5: Morphology of Maundia supports its isolated phylogenetic position in the early‐divergent monocot order Alismatales 103 CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK 141 REFERENCES 143 APPENDICES 169 Appendix 1. List of accession (Chapter 1) Appendix 2. Voucher information (Chapter 2) Appendix 3.
    [Show full text]