DOCSLIB.ORG

What's in the Net?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What's in the Net? WHAT’S IN THE NET? Using camera technology to monitor, and support mitigation of, wildlife bycatch in fisheries This report was funded through a partnership between WWF and Sky Ocean Rescue Contents Report delivered by Seascope Fisheries Research 19 Cromwell Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................... 6 York, UK, YO11 2DR RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................10 BACKGROUND OF REM IN FISHERIES ........................................12 Recommended Citation REVIEW OF MONITORING APPROACHES - Course, G.P., Pierre, J., and Howell, TECHNOLOGY AND COSTS ...................................................15 B.K., 2020. What’s in the Net? Using camera technology to monitor, and OVERVIEW OF CURRENT WORLDWIDE support mitigation of, wildlife bycatch REM PROGRAMMES AND PROJECTS .......................................28 in fisheries. Published by WWF. STAKEHOLDERS ..............................................................38 Acknowledgments CASE STUDY EXAMPLES .....................................................44 The authors would like to thank all the suppliers of REM equipment that BEST PRACTICE REM FOR ETP MANAGEMENT ............................68 kindly provided details and costs of their systems. We would especially like CONCLUSION ..................................................................76 to thank Howard McElderry and Jason Bryan of Archipelago Marine Research RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................82 for supplying images and advice; Brian Cowan of Anchorlab for allowing us to REFERENCES ..................................................................84 use his diagram and providing details of their system; and Javier de la Cal of ANNEXES ......................................................................93 Satlink for advice on the deployment of the SeaTube system on pelagic vessels and Gonzalo Legorburu Marcos of Digital Observers for details on the Ghanaian REM programme. A special thank you to Lotte Kindt-Larsen of DTU for her assistance in obtaining images from the Danish REM fleet and her review of the Danish case study and Claire van der Geest of AFMA for providing details and review of the Australian case studies. Information on machine learning from G. Tuck, R. Little, S. Fitzgerald and B. Moore is Publishing office also much appreciated. WWF UK The Living Planet Centre Brewery Road Woking Surrey GU21 4LL Design by Heedi Design WWF, 28 rue Mauverney, 1196 Gland, Switzerland. Tel. +41 22 364 9111 CH-550.0.128.920-7 WWF® and World Wide Fund for Nature® trademarks and ©1986 Panda Symbol are owned by WWF-World Wide Fund For Nature (formerly World Wildlife Fund). All rights reserved. For contact details and further information, please visit our international website at www.panda.org Cover photography: © Martin Abel / DOC WWF INTERNATIONAL 2020: WHAT’S IN THE NET? USING CAMERA TECHNOLOGY TO MONITOR, AND SUPPORT MITIGATION OF, WILDLIFE BYCATCH IN FISHERIES 3 Foreword by John Tanzer Oceans Practice Lead, WWF International A healthy ocean is essential to all life on our blue planet. But today, the ocean’s health is precarious, which is why WWF is working around the world with partners from community groups to UN agencies, businesses to watchdog groups, to secure ocean recovery. The UN Intergovernmental Report on Biodiversity As well as heavy machinery and overhead highlighted that commercial fishing has been the moving equipment, there is the issue of a biggest cause of marine biodiversity loss in the working on an unpredictable moving platform, last 50 years. As well as the impacts of fishing often in dangerous seas. Crews can be hostile if on target species, fishing vessels often – either there are perceived or real conflicts of interest unintentionally, or on purpose and illegally – catch between observer data and fisher livelihoods. species they are not interested in, or are prohibited If vessels are at sea for long periods, observers from taking and selling. It’s called “bycatch.” may feel isolated and unsupported. Accidents, injury, intimidation, abuse and unexplained These non-target bycatch species can be almost deaths have been reported in some monitoring anything that lives in or near the ocean: fish, programmes around the world. seabirds, marine mammals, turtles, sharks – including many endangered, threatened or REM presents a cost effective and low risk protected species. Sadly, bycatch is the main solution to support the work of human driver of decline and threat of extinction in a observers, and significantly expand independent number of endangered or critically endangered monitoring across fleets where there is no marine species, and staggering statistics estimate monitoring. This report looks at the many that every year fisheries bycatch kills: 720,000 benefits REM with cameras has to offer fisheries seabirds, 300,000 whales and dolphins, 345,000 management, which include cost savings, ability A HEALTHY OCEAN seals and sealions, over 250,000 turtles, and more to scale up and improved accuracy of science than 1.1 million tonnes of sharks and rays. used to manage and mitigate wildlife bycatch. It also highlights staff welfare as a benefit, whereby While these bycatch estimates show the need for REM can improve transparency and safety for urgent action to bring the death toll down, action human observers on vessels and in doing so, is too often hampered by significant scientific reduce the risk of injury, abuse or even fatality IS ESSENTIAL TO uncertainty around the true impact of fishing on witnessed in human observer programmes. our ocean, due to very low levels of independent monitoring. This is why WWF is advocating The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the for greater accountability and transparency critical importance of building sustainable, from fishing fleets and calling on governments, healthy natural systems and resilient supply ALL LIFE ON OUR managers and industry to adopt the most effective, chains, and we feel confident that REM with value-for-money tools for monitoring fishing cameras can contribute to these efforts. REM activities at sea, collecting data and assuring best with cameras and sensors represents a practice and compliance. transparent, cost-effective, proportionate and risk-based approach to improving monitoring of A number of fisheries around the world are fisheries. The comprehensive and verifiable data BLUE PLANET. recognised as being high risk for bycatch and, provided by REM can facilitate the transformation ideally, these should have 100% observer coverage. of fisheries across our oceans by unlocking the However, fishery observers work in some of the multiple benefits that flow from sustainable and harshest and most dangerous work environments transparent fisheries management, while also known. potentially saving lives at sea. WWF INTERNATIONAL 2020: WHAT’S IN THE NET? USING CAMERA TECHNOLOGY TO MONITOR, AND SUPPORT MITIGATION OF, WILDLIFE BYCATCH IN FISHERIES 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sustainable fisheries management is vital for the livelihoods and wellbeing of people all around the world, and for the health and survival of marine ecosystems and species. Remote Electronic Monitoring with cameras (REM) of fisheries is a powerful tool to underpin sustainable fisheries management. This report explores how REM can be used to address the particular issue of unintentional killing of Endangered, Threatened and Protected (ETP) species in commercial fishing, which we term “ETP bycatch.” It outlines the benefits of REM for bycatch monitoring and mitigation and provides an overview of where REM has been used in relation to ETP bycatch around the world to date. It provides five case studies and identifies best practice elements of implementation, and applies these to two hypothetical fisheries of different scale and scope. Finally, it offers advice on accelerating the adoption of REM and recommendations for the adoption of REM as a key element of sustainable fisheries management. WWF INTERNATIONAL 2020: WHAT’S IN THE NET? USING CAMERA TECHNOLOGY TO MONITOR, AND SUPPORT MITIGATION OF, WILDLIFE BYCATCH IN FISHERIES 7 Best practice elements of REM Accelerating the implementation adoption of REM EXECUTIVE In-depth analysis of case studies of The benefits of REM for monitoring REM implementation in a range of and managing ETP species fisheries fisheries around the world reveals interactions are clear. The essential certain steps and processes that question then becomes – how do we significantly improve the chance of encourage and accelerate the adoption REM project success. of REM across fisheries globally? The SUMMARY report identifies that adoption of REM These include: could be accelerated and incentivised by: • Feasibility / pilot study conducted that tests specific objectives • Developing and enabling incentives The value of REM for ETP bycatch monitoring • REM in place operationally to including market drivers ARTIFICIALLY address clear objectives • Making REM a regulatory INTELLIGENT ETP bycatch is a significant issue globally. Every year, it is estimated that fisheries • Roles, responsibilities, and requirement and imbedding it as a SOFTWARE IS bycatch kills: 720,000 Seabirds, 300,000 whales and dolphins, 345,000 seals and operational requirements, systems mainstream operational monitoring sealions, over 250,000 turtles, 120,000 sea snakes (in one fishery alone), 1,135,000 and processes are documented (in method for ETP interactions DRIVING COST tonnes of sharks and rays,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Evaluation of Cetacean Bycatch in UK Fisheries: Problems and Solutions
    AN EVALUATION OF CETACEAN BYCATCH IN UK FISHERIES: PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS A report to WDC and HSI Russell Leaper | February 2021 1 SUMMARY Cetacean bycatch has been a serious and persistent welfare and conservation issue in UK waters for many years. The most recent estimates indicate that over 1000 cetaceans are killed each year in UK fisheries. The species most affected are harbour porpoise, common dolphin, minke and humpback whale, but all cetaceans in UK waters are vulnerable. The level of suffering for mammals that become entangled in fishing gear has been described as ‘one of the grossest abuses of wild animal sensibility in the modern world’. Although potential solutions exist, the mitigation efforts to date have only achieved small reductions in the numbers of animals that are killed. The Fisheries Act 2020 commits the UK to minimise and, where possible, eliminate bycatch of sensitive species. The Act does not include details of how to achieve this, but requires reconsideration of fisheries management and practices, the phasing out of some gears, and a change of approach from strategies previously pursued. While gill nets are recognised as the highest risk gear category globally for cetacean bycatch, there are also serious bycatch problems associated with trawl fisheries and with creel fisheries using pots and traps. The different characteristics of these gear types and the types and size of vessels involved, require different approaches to bycatch monitoring and mitigation. Acoustic deterrent devices (ADDs), such as ‘pingers’, have been shown to be effective at reducing harbour porpoise bycatch in gill nets, but the reduction achieved so far has been small, they may cause unwanted disturbance or displacement, and they may not be effective for other species.
    [Show full text]
  • SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES and RESPONSIBLE AQUACULTURE: a Guide for USAID Staff and Partners
    SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES AND RESPONSIBLE AQUACULTURE: A Guide for USAID Staff and Partners June 2013 ABOUT THIS GUIDE GOAL This guide provides basic information on how to design programs to reform capture fisheries (also referred to as “wild” fisheries) and aquaculture sectors to ensure sound and effective development, environmental sustainability, economic profitability, and social responsibility. To achieve these objectives, this document focuses on ways to reduce the threats to biodiversity and ecosystem productivity through improved governance and more integrated planning and management practices. In the face of food insecurity, global climate change, and increasing population pressures, it is imperative that development programs help to maintain ecosystem resilience and the multiple goods and services that ecosystems provide. Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem functions are central to maintaining ecosystem integrity, health, and productivity. The intent of the guide is not to suggest that fisheries and aquaculture are interchangeable: these sectors are unique although linked. The world cannot afford to neglect global fisheries and expect aquaculture to fill that void. Global food security will not be achievable without reversing the decline of fisheries, restoring fisheries productivity, and moving towards more environmentally friendly and responsible aquaculture. There is a need for reform in both fisheries and aquaculture to reduce their environmental and social impacts. USAID’s experience has shown that well-designed programs can reform capture fisheries management, reducing threats to biodiversity while leading to increased productivity, incomes, and livelihoods. Agency programs have focused on an ecosystem-based approach to management in conjunction with improved governance, secure tenure and access to resources, and the application of modern management practices.
    [Show full text]
  • FAO Fisheries & Aquaculture
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Fisheries and for a world without hunger Aquaculture Department Fishing Techniques Midwater Pair Trawling Main Components Aquatic species Target Species Semi-pelagic/demersal species Atlantic herring European pilchard(=Sardine) Seabream Hake Seabass European sprat Target Species Pelagic species Gear types: Midwater pair trawls Midwater pair trawls It has similar characteristics as midwater trawls used with otter boards. Vessel types: Pair trawlers In the wet-fish trawler the fish is kept in the hold in the fresh/"wet" condition. Characteristics Midwater pair trawling Species Environment Midwater pair trawling can be effective in different situations: when fish are aggregated into large dense shoals and when (at another season or time of the day or according to physiological status) fishes are regularly distributed within a given water layer. In addition to the difference it makes whether the FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department fish are aggregated in a small volume or spread within a large one, fish may swim (and avoid the net) at different speeds according to its own physiological status and/or other external conditions. As a result, in addition to the fish which is targeted, other different conditions will affect the design and size of the midwater trawl, as well as the towing speed. Fishing Gear A midwater pair trawl has roughly similar design as other midwater trawls. Midwater pair trawls might, however, be designed to have a more rectangular opening than ordinary midwater otter trawls. Midwater pair trawls might be rigged with two towing warps from each vessel or alternatively with one towing warp from each vessel and a bridle arrangement.
    [Show full text]
  • Hauling up Solutions
    HAULING UP SOLUTIONS REDUCING CETACEAN BYCATCH IN UK FISHERIES WORKSHOP REPORT HAULING UP SOLUTIONS REPORT 1 CONTENTS CONTENTS 1 SECTION ONE: SUMMARY 2 SECTION TWO: BACKGROUND 6 SECTION THREE: INTRODUCTION TO THE ISSUE 10 SECTION FOUR: MONITORING 14 SECTION FIVE: MITIGATION 17 SECTION SIX: RECOMMENDATIONS 26 SECTION SEVEN: NEXT STEPS 28 SECTION EIGHT: STAY IN TOUCH & GLOSSARY 30 ANNEX: REFERENCES, WORKSHOP PRESENTERS REPORT CITATION Tindall, C., Hetherington, S., Bell, C., Deaville, R., Barker, J., Borrow, K., Oakley, M., Bendall, V., Engelhard, G. (Eds) (2019) Hauling Up Solutions: Reducing Cetacean Bycatch in UK Fisheries. Final Workshop Report. 31 pp. www.cefas.co.uk/cetacean-by-catch-workshop. CHATHAM HOUSE RULE This report gives a summary of a participatory workshop on cetacean bycatch held at the Zoological Society of London (ZSL) on 12-13 March 2019 held under the Chatham House Rule. As a result, no comments are affiliated to any individual or organisation apart from direct quotes, for which permission was sought. i HAULING UP SOLUTIONS REPORT SECTION ONE SUMMARY Accidental capture in fishing gear (bycatch) is one of the greatest threats faced globally by cetaceans (whales, dolphins and porpoises) and has contributed to the decline and extinction of some populations and species1. Cetacean bycatch is problematic as it represents a welfare issue for individuals caught which is of public concern; an economic cost to fishermen owing to the time taken to clear and repair damaged gear, and the subsequent lost catch; an issue of safety for fishermen when clearing nets; as well as a potential conservation concern for some species or populations.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTRY SECTION United States Fishery Products
    Validity date from COUNTRY United States 22/01/2021 00499 SECTION Fishery products Date of publication 28/07/2007 List in force Approval number Name City Regions Activities Remark Date of request 1000025102 GET SEAFOOD, INC. Winter Haven Florida PP 08/04/2013 1000025909 Fagan Alligator Products, Inc. Dade City Florida PP 1000084596 Sea-Trek Enterprises, Inc. East Greenwich Rhode Island PP O! 10/07/2008 1000112376 Pontchartrain Blue Crab Slidell Louisiana PP 14/04/2010 1000113172 Fishermen's Ice & Bait, Inc. Madeira Beach Florida PP 1000113708 Beck's Smokery Pompano Beach Florida PP 1000113902 Colorado Boxed Beef Co. Port Everglades Florida CS 16/11/2011 1000114005 D & D Seafood Corporation Marathon Florida PP 1000114027 BAMA SEA PRODUCTS St. Petersburg Florida PP 1000114048 Moon's Seafood Company W. Melbourne Florida PP O! 1000114049 Glanbia Performance Nutrition (Manufacturing), Inc., Florida Sunrise Florida PP 13/10/2017 Facility 1000114069 Placeres & Sons Seafood Hialeah Florida PP 1000114070 Webb's Seafood, Inc. Youngstown Florida PP 14/10/2009 1000114156 Cox's Wholesale Seafood, Inc. Tampa Florida PP 1000114170 Kings Seafood, Inc. Port Orange Florida PP 1 / 59 List in force Approval number Name City Regions Activities Remark Date of request 1000114326 Optimus, Inc. Dba Marky's Miami Florida PP 1000115645 AMERIQUAL FOODS LLC Evansville Indiana PP 06/02/2019 1000115810 Henriksen Fisheries, Inc Sister Bay Wisconsin PP 1000117125 RB Manufacturing LLC Salt Lake City Utah PP 08/01/2015 1000120312 Stauber Performance Ingredients, Inc. Florida New York PP 08/08/2019 1000120556 Plenus Group, Inc. Lowell Massachusetts PP 06/05/2008 1000120753 GARBO LOBSTER LLC Groton Connecticut PP 17/10/2016 1000121950 True World Foods, NY LLC Elizabeth New Jersey PP Aq 1000122358 Lamonica Fine Foods, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure-Function Relationship of the Lung of the Australian Sea Lion Neophoca Cinerea
    The Structure-Function Relationship of the Lung of the Australian Sea Liont Neophoc e clnerea by Anthony Nicholson B.V.Sc. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhY' Department of PathologY' UniversitY of Adelaide February 1984 Frontispiece: Group of four adull female Australian sea lions basking in the sun at Seal Bay, Kangaroo Island. ËF:æ: oo',,, 'å¡ -*-d, l--- --a - .¡* É--- .-\tb.<¡- <} b' \ .ltl '' 4 qÙ CONTENTS Page List of Figures X List of Tables xi Abstract XIV Declaration XV Acknowledge m ents I I. Introduction Chapter \ I I.I Classification of Marine Mammals I I.2', Distribution of Australian Pinnipeds 2 I.3 Diving CaPabilitY 3 PhYsiologY 1.4 Diving 4 Cardiovascular SYstem ' l'.4.I B I.4.2 OxYgen Stores 1l L.4.3 BiochemicalAdaPtations L3 I.4.4 PulmonarYFunction I.4.5 Effects oi Incteased Hydrostatic Pressure T6 l-8 1.5 SummarY and Aims 20 Chapter 2. Materials and Methods 20 ?.I Specimen Collection 2I 2.2 Lung Fixation 2I 2.3 Lung Votume Determination 22 2.4 Parasite Collection and Incubation 22 2.5 M icroscoPY 22 2.5.I Light MicroscoPY Electron Microscopy 23 2..5.2 Trãnsmission 23 2.5.3 Scanning ElectronMicroscopy 25 Chapter 5. Norm al ResPiratorY Structure 25 t.r Introduction 25 Mam maI Respiratory System 3.2 Terrestrial 25 1.2.I MacroscoPtc 27 3.2.2 MicroscoPic 27 SYstem 3.3 Pinniped ResPiratorY 27 3.3.I MacroscoPic 28 3.3.2 MicroscoPic 3I 3.4 Results 3I 1.4.L MacroscoPic 32 3.4.2 MicroscoPic 7B 3.5 Discussion 7B 3.5.I MacroscoPtc 79 3.5.2 MicroscoPic 92 3.6 SummarY IV Page Chapter 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Thailand's Shrimp Culture Growing
    Foreign Fishery Developments BURMA ':.. VIET­ ,' . .' NAM LAOS .............. Thailand's Shrimp ...... Culture Growing THAI LAND ,... ~samut Sangkhram :. ~amut Sakorn Pond cultivation ofblacktigerprawns, khlaarea. Songkhla's National Institute '. \ \ Bangkok........· Penaeus monodon, has brought sweep­ ofCoastal Aquaculture (NICA) has pro­ , ••~ Samut prokan ing economic change over the last2 years vided the technological foundation for the to the coastal areas of Songkhla and establishment of shrimp culture in this Nakhon Si Thammarat on the Malaysian area. Since 1982, NICA has operated a Peninsula (Fig. 1). Large, vertically inte­ large shrimp hatchery where wild brood grated aquaculture companies and small­ stock are reared on high-quality feeds in .... Gulf of () VIET­ scale rice farmers alike have invested optimum water temperature and salinity NAM heavily in the transformation of paddy conditions. The initial buyers ofNICA' s Thailand fields into semi-intensive ponds for shrimp postlarvae (pI) were small-scale Nakhon Si Thammarat shrimp raising. Theyhave alsodeveloped shrimp farmers surrounding Songkhla • Hua Sai Songkhla an impressive infrastructure ofelectrical Lake. .. Hot Yai and water supplies, feeder roads, shrimp Andaman hatcheries, shrimp nurseries, feed mills, Background Sea cold storage, and processing plants. Thailand's shrimp culture industry is Located within an hour's drive ofSong­ the fastest growing in Southeast Asia. In khla's new deep-waterport, the burgeon­ only 5 years, Thailand has outstripped its Figure 1.-Thailand and its major shrimp ing shrimp industry will have direct competitors to become the region's num­ culture area. access to international markets. Despite ber one producer. Thai shrimp harvests a price slump since May 1989, expansion in 1988 reached 55,000 metric tons (t), onall fronts-production, processingand a 320 percent increase over the 13,000 t marketing-continues at a feverish pace.
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA's Description of the U.S Commercial Fisheries Including The
    6.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PELAGIC LONGLINE FISHERY FOR ATLANTIC HMS The HMS FMP provides a thorough description of the U.S. fisheries for Atlantic HMS, including sectors of the pelagic longline fishery. Below is specific information regarding the catch of pelagic longline fishermen in the Gulf of Mexico and off the Southeast coast of the United States. For more detailed information on the fishery, please refer to the HMS FMP. 6.1 Pelagic Longline Gear The U.S. pelagic longline fishery for Atlantic HMS primarily targets swordfish, yellowfin tuna, or bigeye tuna in various areas and seasons. Secondary target species include dolphin, albacore tuna, pelagic sharks including mako, thresher, and porbeagle sharks, as well as several species of large coastal sharks. Although this gear can be modified (i.e., depth of set, hook type, etc.) to target either swordfish, tunas, or sharks, like other hook and line fisheries, it is a multispecies fishery. These fisheries are opportunistic, switching gear style and making subtle changes to the fishing configuration to target the best available economic opportunity of each individual trip. Longline gear sometimes attracts and hooks non-target finfish with no commercial value, as well as species that cannot be retained by commercial fishermen, such as billfish. Pelagic longline gear is composed of several parts. See Figure 6.1. Figure 6.1. Typical U.S. pelagic longline gear. Source: Arocha, 1997. When targeting swordfish, the lines generally are deployed at sunset and hauled in at sunrise to take advantage of the nocturnal near-surface feeding habits of swordfish. In general, longlines targeting tunas are set in the morning, deeper in the water column, and hauled in the evening.
    [Show full text]
  • 56. Otariidae and Phocidae
    FAUNA of AUSTRALIA 56. OTARIIDAE AND PHOCIDAE JUDITH E. KING 1 Australian Sea-lion–Neophoca cinerea [G. Ross] Southern Elephant Seal–Mirounga leonina [G. Ross] Ross Seal, with pup–Ommatophoca rossii [J. Libke] Australian Sea-lion–Neophoca cinerea [G. Ross] Weddell Seal–Leptonychotes weddellii [P. Shaughnessy] New Zealand Fur-seal–Arctocephalus forsteri [G. Ross] Crab-eater Seal–Lobodon carcinophagus [P. Shaughnessy] 56. OTARIIDAE AND PHOCIDAE DEFINITION AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION Pinnipeds are aquatic carnivores. They differ from other mammals in their streamlined shape, reduction of pinnae and adaptation of both fore and hind feet to form flippers. In the skull, the orbits are enlarged, the lacrimal bones are absent or indistinct and there are never more than three upper and two lower incisors. The cheek teeth are nearly homodont and some conditions of the ear that are very distinctive (Repenning 1972). Both superfamilies of pinnipeds, Phocoidea and Otarioidea, are represented in Australian waters by a number of species (Table 56.1). The various superfamilies and families may be distinguished by important and/or easily observed characters (Table 56.2). King (1983b) provided more detailed lists and references. These and other differences between the above two groups are not regarded as being of great significance, especially as an undoubted fur seal (Australian Fur-seal Arctocephalus pusillus) is as big as some of the sea lions and has some characters of the skull, teeth and behaviour which are rather more like sea lions (Repenning, Peterson & Hubbs 1971; Warneke & Shaughnessy 1985). The Phocoidea includes the single Family Phocidae – the ‘true seals’, distinguished from the Otariidae by the absence of a pinna and by the position of the hind flippers (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • US Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan—Pacific Region
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan Conservation Seabird Pacific Region U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan—Pacific Region 120 0’0"E 140 0’0"E 160 0’0"E 180 0’0" 160 0’0"W 140 0’0"W 120 0’0"W 100 0’0"W RUSSIA CANADA 0’0"N 0’0"N 50 50 WA CHINA US Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Region OR ID AN NV JAP CA H A 0’0"N I W 0’0"N 30 S A 30 N L I ort I Main Hawaiian Islands Commonwealth of the hwe A stern A (see inset below) Northern Mariana Islands Haw N aiian Isla D N nds S P a c i f i c Wake Atoll S ND ANA O c e a n LA RI IS Johnston Atoll MA Guam L I 0’0"N 0’0"N N 10 10 Kingman Reef E Palmyra Atoll I S 160 0’0"W 158 0’0"W 156 0’0"W L Howland Island Equator A M a i n H a w a i i a n I s l a n d s Baker Island Jarvis N P H O E N I X D IN D Island Kauai S 0’0"N ONE 0’0"N I S L A N D S 22 SI 22 A PAPUA NEW Niihau Oahu GUINEA Molokai Maui 0’0"S Lanai 0’0"S 10 AMERICAN P a c i f i c 10 Kahoolawe SAMOA O c e a n Hawaii 0’0"N 0’0"N 20 FIJI 20 AUSTRALIA 0 200 Miles 0 2,000 ES - OTS/FR Miles September 2003 160 0’0"W 158 0’0"W 156 0’0"W (800) 244-WILD http://www.fws.gov Information U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Seafood Watch Seafood Report
    Seafood Watch Seafood Report Sharks and Dogfish With a focus on: Blacktip shark (Carcharhinus limbatus) Common thresher shark (Alopias vulpinus) Dusky smoothhound/smooth dogfish (Mustelus canis) Sandbar shark (Carcharhinus plumbeus) Shortfin mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchus) Spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) © Monterey Bay Aquarium Final Report December 21, 2005 Stock Status Update June 9, 2011 Santi Roberts Fisheries Research Analyst Monterey Bay Aquarium SeafoodWatch® Sharks & DogfishReport June 9, 2010 About Seafood Watch® and the Seafood Reports Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch® program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch® defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. Seafood Watch® makes its science-based recommendations available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from the Internet (seafoodwatch.org) or obtained from the Seafood Watch® program by emailing [email protected]. The program’s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservation issues and empower seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans. Each sustainability recommendation on the regional pocket guides is supported by a Seafood Report. Each report synthesizes and analyzes the most current ecological, fisheries and ecosystem science on a species, then evaluates this information against the program’s conservation ethic to arrive at a recommendation of “Best Choices,” “Good Alternatives,” or “Avoid.” The detailed evaluation methodology is available upon request. In producing the Seafood Reports, Seafood Watch® seeks out research published in academic, peer-reviewed journals whenever possible.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Thresher Shark, Alopias Vulpinus
    4 Thresher Shark, Alopias vulpinus Thresher shark, Alopias vulpinus. Photo credit: Dale Sweetnam. History of the Fishery The common thresher shark, Alopias vulpinus, is the most common commercially landed shark in California. They are primarily caught using large mesh drift gill nets and hook and line gear, but are also caught incidentally with small mesh gill nets and harpoon. Prior to 1977, all sharks were reported in one market category and not separated by species, and it is assumed threshers were caught as bycatch in gears at levels similar or greater than today. The first significant fishery for thresher sharks began the late 1970s to early 1980s when drift gill net fishers began to target them close to the southern California coastline. The fishery expanded rapidly and, because of overfishing concerns, the California Department of Fish and Game (Department) as mandated by the State Legislature began an observer program, monitored landings and implemented a logbook program. A limited entry permit program for drift gill net gear was initiated in 1982, with permits issued to fishers rather than boats to prevent false inflation in value. The drift gill net fishery for thresher sharks peaked in 1981 when 113 Status of the Fisheries Report 2008 4-1 drift gill net boats landed nearly 600 tons (544 metric tons). However, total landings using all gears were highest the following year with a total of more than 1700 tons (1542 metric tons) taken by all gears (Figure 4-1). 2000 1500 1000 Landings (short tons) (short Landings 500 0 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 Year Figure 4-1.
    [Show full text]