Decapoda: Astacidea)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Decapoda: Astacidea) Edith Cowan University Research Online ECU Publications Post 2013 2015 Multiple Drivers of Decline In The Global Status Of Freshwater Crayfish (Decapoda: Astacidea) Nadia I. Richman Monika Bohm Susan Adams Fernando Alvarez Elizabeth A. Bergey See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013 Part of the Biodiversity Commons 10.1098/rstb.2014.0060 Richman, N. I., Böhm, M., Adams, S. B., Alvarez, F., Bergey, E. A., Bunn, J. J. S., . Collen, B. (2015). Multiple drivers of decline in the global status of freshwater crayfish (Decapoda: Astacidea) (Vol. 370). Available here This Journal Article is posted at Research Online. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013/594 Authors Nadia I. Richman, Monika Bohm, Susan Adams, Fernando Alvarez, Elizabeth A. Bergey, John J.S. Bunn, Quinton Burnham, Jay Cordeiro, Jason Coughran, Keith A. Crandall, Kathryn L. Dawkins, Robert J. DiStefano, Niall E. Doran, Lennart Edsman, Arnold G. Eversole, Leopold Fureder, James M. Furse, Francessa Gherardi, Premek Hamr, David M. Holdich, Pierre Horwitz, Kerrylyn Johnston, Clive M. Jones, Julia P.G. Jones, Robert L. Jones, Thomas G. Jones, Tadashi Kawai, Susan Lawler, Marilu Lopez-Mejia, Rebecca M. Miller, Carlos Pedraza-Lara, Julian D. Reynolds, Alastair M.M. Richardson, Mark B. Schiltz, Guenter A. Schuster, Peter J. Sibley, Catherine Souty-Grosset, Christopher A. Taylor, Roger F. Thoma, Jerry Walls, Todd S. Walsh, and Ben Collen This journal article is available at Research Online: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013/594 Downloaded from http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on September 12, 2017 Multiple drivers of decline in the global status of freshwater crayfish (Decapoda: rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org Astacidea) Nadia I. Richman1,2, Monika Bo¨hm1, Susan B. Adams3, Fernando Alvarez4, 5 6 6 7 Research Elizabeth A. Bergey , John J. S. Bunn , Quinton Burnham , Jay Cordeiro , Jason Coughran6,8, Keith A. Crandall9,10, Kathryn L. Dawkins11, Robert Cite this article: Richman NI et al. 2015 J. DiStefano12, Niall E. Doran13, Lennart Edsman14, Arnold G. Eversole15, Multiple drivers of decline in the global status Leopold Fu¨reder16, James M. Furse17, Francesca Gherardi18,†, Premek Hamr19, of freshwater crayfish (Decapoda: Astacidea). 20 6 21,22 23 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 370: 20140060. David M. Holdich , Pierre Horwitz , Kerrylyn Johnston , Clive M. Jones , http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0060 Julia P. G. Jones2, Robert L. Jones24, Thomas G. Jones25, Tadashi Kawai26, Susan Lawler27, Marilu Lo´pez-Mejı´a28, Rebecca M. Miller29, Carlos Pedraza- One contribution of 17 to a discussion meeting Lara30, Julian D. Reynolds31, Alastair M. M. Richardson32, Mark B. Schultz33, issue ‘Phylogeny, extinction and conservation’. Guenter A. Schuster34, Peter J. Sibley35, Catherine Souty-Grosset36, Christopher Subject Areas: A. Taylor37, Roger F. Thoma38, Jerry Walls39, Todd S. Walsh40 and Ben Collen41 ecology, evolution 1Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London NW1 4RY, UK 2School of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK Keywords: 3USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Center for Bottomland Hardwoods Research, 1000 Front St., extinction risk, crayfish, IUCN Red List, Oxford, MS 38655-4915, USA 4Coleccio´n Nacional de Crusta´ceos, Instituto de Biologı´a, Universidad Nacional Auto´noma de Me´xico, threatened, freshwater biodiversity Apartado Postal 70-153, Me´xico 04510 DF, Me´xico 5Oklahoma Biological Survey and Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA 6 Author for correspondence: School of Natural Sciences, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia Nadia I. Richman 7Northeast Natural History and Supply, 24 North Grove St., Middleboro, MA 02346, USA e-mail: [email protected] 8Jagabar Environmental, PO Box 634, Duncraig, Western Australia 6023, Australia 9Computational Biology Institute, George Washington University, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA 10Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013, USA 11Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Queensland 4222, Australia 12Missouri Department of Conservation, 3500 East Gans Road, Columbia, MO 65201, USA 13Bookend Trust and the School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, PO Box 310, Sandy Bay, Tasmania 7006, Australia 14Institute of Freshwater Research, Department of Aquatic Resources, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 178 93 Drottningholm, Sweden 15School of Agricultural, Forestry and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA 16River Ecology and Conservation, Institute of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstrasse 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria 17Griffith School of Environment and the Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Queensland 4222, Australia 18Dipartimento di Biologia, Universita` degli Studi di Firenze, via Romana 17, 50125 Firenze, Italy 19Upper Canada College, 200 Lonsdale Road, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4V 1W6 20Crayfish Survey and Research, Peak Ecology Limited, Arden House, Deepdale Business Park, Bakewell, †We dedicate this paper to Francesca, our Derbyshire DE45 1GT, UK 21Environmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, 90 South St., Murdoch, co-author and friend, who sadly passed away Western Australia 6150, Australia in February 2013. She was an outstanding 22Marine and Freshwater Research Laboratory, Murdoch University, 90 South St., Murdoch, scientist and made a significant contribution to Western Australia 6150, Australia 23James Cook University, School of Marine and Tropical Biology, PO Box 6811, Cairns, Queensland 4870, Australia the field of invasive species biology. She is 24Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks, Museum of Natural Science, 2148 Riverside Drive, dearly missed. Jackson, MS 39202-1353, USA & 2015 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. Downloaded from http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on September 12, 2017 25Department of Integrated Science and Technology, Marshall University, of valuable services, including fisheries, domestic and commer- 2 1 John Marshall Drive, Huntington, WV 25755, USA cial water supply, carbon sequestration and energy; however, a 26 rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org Wakkanai Fisheries Institute, 4-5-15 Suehiro, Wakkanai, 097-0001 Hokkaido, Japan rapidly growing human population has increased the demand 27 Department of Environmental Management and Ecology, La Trobe University, on freshwater resources leading to a freshwater biodiversity Wodonga, Victoria 3690, Australia crisis [2]. While knowledge on the conservation status and dis- 28Evolutionary Biology and Population Genetics Laboratory, Universidad de Quintana tribution of freshwater taxa is disparate relative to terrestrial Roo, Unidad Acade´mica Cozumel, Av. Andre´s Quintana Roo con Calle 110s/n, Frente a Col. San Gervasio, Cozumel 77600, Q. Roo, Me´xico species [3], there is growing evidence that freshwater taxa 29International Union for Conservation of Nature, Global Ecosystem Management (i.e. crabs, dragonflies, fish and molluscs) are at greater risk of Programme, 219c Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK extinction than terrestrial vertebrates (i.e. mammals, reptiles 30Universidad Nacional Auto´noma de Me´xico, Facultad de Medicina, Circuito Interior, or birds) [3–9]. Given the disproportionately high biodiversity Ciudad Universitaria, Av. Universidad 3000, CP 04510. Universidad Nacional Auto´noma harboured in freshwater ecosystems, knowledge on the distri- de Me´xico, Instituto de Biologı´a, tercer circuito s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoaca´n, bution and conservation status of freshwater species will be Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B Me´xico DF CP 04510, Me´xico essential for monitoring targets set by the Convention on Bio- 31 Trinity College Dublin, 115 Weirview Drive, Stillorgan, Co. Dublin, Ireland logical Diversity [3]. For example, Target 6 aims to ensure that 32 School of Biology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, ‘all fish and invertebrate stocks and aquatic plants are managed Australia and harvested sustainably by 2020’, Target 11 is to conserve 33Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, 17% of inland water by 2020 and Target 12 requires that by 30 Flemington Road, Parkville, 3010 Victoria, Australia 370 34305 Boone Way, Richmond, KY 40475, USA 2020 ‘the extinction of known threatened species has been pre- 35Environment Agency, Wessex Area, Rivers House, East Quay, Bridgwater TA6 4YS, UK vented and their conservation status, particularly of those most : 20140060 36Laboratoire Ecologie et Biologie des Interactions, Universite´ de Poitiers, Equipe in decline, has been improved and sustained’ [10]. Ecologie Evolution Symbiose, UMR CNRS 7267, Poitiers Cedex, France Limited resources available for conservation require 37Prairie Research Institute, Illinois Natural History Survey, 1816 S. Oak, Champaign, practitioners to prioritize areas for action. Selection of priority IL 61820, USA areas requires knowledge on the distribution and conservation 38Midwest Biodiversity
Recommended publications
  • FINAL REPORT Distribution and Habitat of the Tennessee
    0 FINAL REPORT Distribution and Habitat of the Tennessee Bottlebrush Crayfish, Barbicambarus simmonsi ILLINOIS NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY PRAIRIE RESEARCH INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN 1816 S. OAK CHAMPAIGN, IL 61820 INHS TECHNICAL REPORT 2014(19) BY Andrew J. Stites Illinois Natural History Survey 1816 S. Oak Champaign, IL 61820 Christopher A. Taylor, Ph. D. Illinois Natural History Survey 1816 S. Oak Champaign, IL 61820 PREPARED FOR: Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation William R. Snodgrass Tennessee Tower 312 Rosa L. Parks Ave Nashville, TN 37243 20 July 2014 1 Introduction Crayfish are large aquatic invertebrates that have significant affects upon aquatic ecosystems and often comprise a large portion of an aquatic systems biomass (Taylor and Soucek 2010). Crayfish are good indicators of ecosystem health because they serve vital roles within aquatic systems, such as that of a primary consumer breaking down plants, woody debris and detritus into fine particulate organic matter (Parkyn and others 2001). In addition, crayfish can function as scavengers and predators of fish and invertebrates (Momot 1995; Taylor and Soucek 2010; Thomas and Taylor 2013). Finally, crayfish also have the capability to significantly alter their habitats via vegetation reduction and substrate disturbance (Momot 1995). The genus Barbicambarus was comprised of one known species, B. cornutus, until 2010 when B. simmonsi (Fig. 1) was described (Taylor and Schuster 2010). The crayfish in this genus are characterized by having densely setose antennae, a larger than average body size, and a strongly dorsoventrally flattened carapace (Taylor and Schuster 2010). B. cornutus can be found within the Green River basin in Kentucky and Tennessee and occurs most commonly under large flat boulders along creek margins where there is current (Taylor and Schuster 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Wild About Learning
    WILD ABOUT LEARNING An Interdisciplinary Unit Fostering Discovery Learning Written on a 4th grade reading level, Wild Discoveries: Wacky New Animals, is perfect for every kid who loves wacky animals! With engaging full-color photos throughout, the book draws readers right into the animal action! Wild Discoveries features newly discovered species from around the world--such as the Shocking Pink Dragon and the Green Bomber. These wacky species are organized by region with fun facts about each one's amazing abilities and traits. The book concludes with a special section featuring new species discovered by kids! Heather L. Montgomery writes about science and nature for kids. Her subject matter ranges from snake tongues to snail poop. Heather is an award-winning teacher who uses yuck appeal to engage young minds. During a typical school visit, petrified parts and tree guts inspire reluctant writers and encourage scientific thinking. Heather has a B.S. in Biology and a M.S. in Environmental Education. When she is not writing, you can find her painting her face with mud at the McDowell Environmental Center where she is the Education Coordinator. Heather resides on the Tennessee/Alabama border. Learn more about her ten books at www.HeatherLMontgomery.com. Dear Teachers, Photo by Sonya Sones As I wrote Wild Discoveries: Wacky New Animals, I was astounded by how much I learned. As expected, I learned amazing facts about animals and the process of scientifically describing new species, but my knowledge also grew in subjects such as geography, math and language arts. I have developed this unit to share that learning growth with children.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Tolerance Values for Kentucky Crayfishes
    Development of Tolerance Values for Kentucky Crayfishes Kentucky Environmental and Public Protection Cabinet Department for Environmental Protection Division of Water Water Quality Branch Watershed Management Branch 2004 Cover photograph description: Cambarus dubius, Morgan County, Kentucky Suggested Citation: Peake, D.R., G.J. Pond, and S.E. McMurray. 2004. Development of tolerance values for Kentucky crayfishes. Kentucky Environmental and Public Protection Cabinet, Department for Environmental Protection, Division of Water, Frankfort. The Environmental and Public Protection Cabinet (EPPC) does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, or disability. The EPPC will provide, on request, reasonable accommodations including auxiliary aids and services necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in all services, programs and activities. To request materials in an alternative format, contact the Kentucky Division of Water, 14 Reilly Road, Frankfort, KY, 40601 or call (502) 564-3410. Hearing and speech-impaired persons can contact the agency by using the Kentucky Relay Service, a toll-free telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD). For voice to TDD, call 800-648- 6057. For TDD to voice, call 800-648-6056. Funding for this project was provided in part by a grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) to the Kentucky Division of Water, Nonpoint Source Section, as authorized by the Clean Water Act Amendments of 1987, §319(h) Nonpoint Source Implementation Grant # C9994861-01. Mention of trade names or commercial products, if any, does not constitute endorsement. This document was printed on recycled paper. Development of Tolerance Values for Kentucky Crayfishes By Daniel R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hoosier- Shawnee Ecological Assessment Area
    United States Department of Agriculture The Hoosier- Forest Service Shawnee Ecological North Central Assessment Research Station General Frank R. Thompson, III, Editor Technical Report NC-244 Thompson, Frank R., III, ed 2004. The Hoosier-Shawnee Ecological Assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-244. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station. 267 p. This report is a scientific assessment of the characteristic composition, structure, and processes of ecosystems in the southern one-third of Illinois and Indiana and a small part of western Kentucky. It includes chapters on ecological sections and soils, water resources, forest, plants and communities, aquatic animals, terrestrial animals, forest diseases and pests, and exotic animals. The information presented provides a context for land and resource management planning on the Hoosier and Shawnee National Forests. ––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Key Words: crayfish, current conditions, communities, exotics, fish, forests, Hoosier National Forest, mussels, plants, Shawnee National Forest, soils, water resources, wildlife. Cover photograph: Camel Rock in Garden of the Gods Recreation Area, with Shawnee Hills and Garden of the Gods Wilderness in the back- ground, Shawnee National Forest, Illinois. Contents Preface....................................................................................................................... II North Central Research Station USDA Forest Service Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chattooga River Crayfish (Cambarus Scotti)
    Comprehensive Report Species - Cambarus scotti Page 1 of7 ~ NatureServe UEXPLORER Soarch About the Dat{i About Us " Contact Us Halp «Previous I Next» View Glossary Cambarus scottl- Hobbs, 1981 Coogle Chattooga River Crayfish Search for Images on Google Related ITIS Name(s): Cambarus scolfiHobbs, 1981 (TSN 97403) Unique Identifier: ELEMENT_GLOBAL,2.115192 Element Code: ICMAL07740 Informal Taxonomy: Animals, Invertebrates - Crustaceans - Crayfishes Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus Animalia Crustacea Malacostraca Decapoda Cambaridae Cambarus Genus Size: D- Medium to large genus (21+ species) Check Ihis box 10 expand all reporl seclions: 0 Concept Hefercnce Concept Reference: Hobbs, Horton. H. Jr. 1989. An l!iuslrated Checklist of the American crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidae, Cambaridae & Parastacidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 480. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, D. C. 236 pp. Concept Reference Code: B89HOBOI GAUS Name Used in Concept Reference: Cambarus scotti -~om;Glvalion ::>Iaiw; NaluroServe Stalus Global Sialus: G3 Global Sialus Lasl Reviewed: 01Jul2009 Global Status Last Changed: 15Jun2000 Rounded Global Slatus: G3 - Vulnerable Reasons: This species only occurs in nine iocalities along Ihe Coosa River basin (extent <5000 sq. km). II has nol been found in any other stream systems and is thought to be endemic to this river. However, there is information major threats which may be having an impact on this species, but it has been described as abundant at some sites where it occurs; especially sites where it
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat, Distribution, and Diet of the Tennessee Bottlebrush Crayfish (Barbicambarus Simmonsi)
    HABITAT, DISTRIBUTION, AND DIET OF THE TENNESSEE BOTTLEBRUSH CRAYFISH (BARBICAMBARUS SIMMONSI) BY ANDREW JOSEPH STITES THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2014 Urbana, Illinois Master’s Committee: Adjunct Assistant Professor Christopher A. Taylor Associate Professor Cory Suski Adjunct Assistant Professor Michael Dreslik ABSTRACT In order to effectively manage and conserve species, it is essential to have a basic understanding of their ecology. Unfortunately, such information is unavailable for most crayfish species, including the two members of the genus Barbicambarus. To obtain ecological data I conducted surveys for Barbicambarus simmonsi within the Shoal Creek drainage in Lawrence County, Tennessee and Lauderdale County, Alabama from Summer 2013-Spring 2014. The objectives of the first part of my study were to determine distribution, habitat use, and site occupancy of the Tennessee Bottlebrush Crayfish, Barbicambarus simmonsi. The distribution was increased from 3 to 14 sites across Shoal Creek. Habitat use modeling did not yield significant results, but observations indicate large flat boulders as utilized habitat. Flow was the most important covariate when determining site occupancy, but this should be interpreted with some caution, as it does not match field observations. The objectives of the second part of my study were to determine trophic position and diet of B. simmonsi and B. cornutus using stable isotope analysis and gut content analysis, and determine if there was correlation between carapace length and trophic position for each species. Crayfish for the analysis were collected during the fall of 2012 and the spring of 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Refinement of the Basin-Wide Index of Biotic Integrity for Non-Tidal Streams and Wadeable Rivers in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
    Refinement of the Basin-Wide Index of Biotic Integrity for Non-Tidal Streams and Wadeable Rivers in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed APPENDICES Appendix A: Taxonomic Classification Appendix B: Taxonomic Attributes Appendix C: Taxonomic Standardization Appendix D: Rarefaction Appendix E: Biological Metric Descriptions Appendix F: Abiotic Parameters for Evaluating Stream Environment Appendix G: Stream Classification Appendix H: HUC12 Watershed Characteristics in Bioregions Appendix I: Index Methodologies Appendix J: Scoring Methodologies Appendix K: Index Performance, Accuracy, and Precision Appendix L: Narrative Ratings and Maps of Index Scores Appendix M: Potential Biases in the Regional Index Ratings Appendix Citations Appendix A: Taxonomic Classification All taxa reported in Chessie BIBI database were assigned the appropriate Phylum, Subphylum, Class, Subclass, Order, Suborder, Family, Subfamily, Tribe, and Genus when applicable. A portion of the taxa reported were reported under an invalid name according to the ITIS database. These taxa were subsequently changed to the taxonomic name deemed valid by ITIS. Table A-1. The taxonomic hierarchy of stream macroinvertebrate taxa included in the Chesapeake Bay non-tidal database.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation
    CONSERVATION ecapod crustaceans in the families Astacidae, recreational and commercial bait fisheries, and serve as a Cambaridae, and Parastacidae, commonly known profitable and popular food resource. Crayfishes often make as crayfishes or crawfishes, are native inhabitants up a large proportion of the biomass produced in aquatic of freshwater ecosystems on every continent systems (Rabeni 1992; Griffith et al. 1994). In streams, sport except Africa and Antarctica. Although nearly worldwide fishes such as sunfishes and basses (family Centrarchidae) in distribution, crayfishes exhibit the highest diversity in may consume up to two-thirds of the annual production of North America north of Mexico with 338 recognized taxa crayfishes, and as such, crayfishes often comprise critical (308 species and 30 subspecies). Mirroring continental pat- food resources for these fishes (Probst et al. 1984; Roell and terns of freshwater fishes (Warren and Burr 1994) and fresh- Orth 1993). Crayfishes also contribute to the maintenance of water mussels (J. D. Williams et al. 1993), the southeastern food webs by processing vegetation and leaf litter (Huryn United States harbors the highest number of crayfish species. and Wallace 1987; Griffith et al. 1994), which increases avail- Crayfishes are a significant component of aquatic ecosys- ability of nutrients and organic matter to other organisms. tems. They facilitate important ecological processes, sustain In some rivers, bait fisheries for crayfishes constitute an Christopher A. Taylor and Melvin L. Warren, Jr. are cochairs of the Crayfish Subcommittee of the AFS Endangered Species Committee. They can be contacted at the Illinois Natural History Survey, Center for Biodiversity, 607 E. Peabody Drive, Champaign, IL 61820, and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Crayfishes (Class Malacostraca) Overview the Freshwater Crayfishes (Order Decapoda) Are One of the Better Known Crustacean Grou
    Crayfishes (Class Malacostraca) Overview The freshwater crayfishes (Order Decapoda) are one of the better known crustacean groups in Kentucky. Worldwide, freshwater crayfishes are represented by over 640 species (Crandall and Buhay 2008) with the southeastern United States being one of the epicenters of diversity. Three hundred sixty species are represented in the United States (Taylor et al. 2007). All of Kentucky’s crayfish fauna falls into the family Cambaridae and is represented by the genera Barbicambarus, Cambarus, Cambarellus, Fallicambarus, Orconectes, and Procambarus. Kentucky is home to one of the richer freshwater crayfish faunas in North America with 54 species, with some of those species still under taxonomic review and others potentially awaiting discovery. Seven species are endemic to the state of Kentucky (Cambarus batchi – Bluegrass Crayfish, Orconectes margorectus – Livingston Crayfish, Orconectes bisectus ¬– Crittenden Crayfish, Orconectes jeffersoni – Louisville Crayfish, Orconectes rafinesquei – Rough River Crayfish, Orconectes tricuspis – Western Highland Crayfish, Orconectes packardi – Appalachian Cave Crayfish). The most comprehensive treatments of Kentucky’s crayfish fauna includes Rhoades (1944) and Taylor and Schuster (2005). Modification of habitats, sedimentation, and dams are serious threats to freshwater crayfishes. A larger threat that has not yet impacted Kentucky is the introduction and establishment of non- native crayfishes. Several studies have shown the displacement of native species by more aggressive or opportunistic non-native species (Capelli 1982; Taylor and Redmer 1996; Hill and Lodge 1999). Many introductions are suspected to be from fisherman dumping their purchased live crayfish into the stream at the end of the day. Nationally, about 48% of crayfish species are of conservation concern (ranging from Vulnerable to Endangered); over a third (37%) of the Kentucky fauna falls into this category (KSNPC, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Natural Heritage Program Rare Species Observations for Tennessee Counties 2009
    Tennessee Natural Heritage Program Rare Species Observations For Tennessee Counties This document provides lists of rare species known to occur within each of Tennessee's counties. If you are viewing the list in its original digital format and you have an internet connection, you may click the scientific names to search the NatureServe Explorer Encyclopedia of Life for more detailed species information. The following lists were last updated in July 2009 and are based on rare species observations stored in the Tennessee Natural Heritage Biotics Database maintained by the TDEC Natural Heritage Program. For definitions of ranks and protective status, or for instructions on obtaining a site specific project review, please visit our website: http://state.tn.us/environment/na/data.shtml If you need assistance using the lists or interpreting data, feel free to contact us: Natural Heritage Program Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation 7th Floor L&C Annex 401 Church Street Nashville, Tennessee 37243 (615) 532-0431 The lists provided are intended for use as planning tools. Because many areas of the state have not been searched for rare species, the lists should not be used to determine the absence of rare species. The lists are best used in conjunction with field visits to identify the types of rare species habitat that may be present at a given location. For projects that are located near county boundaries or are in areas of the state that have been under-surveyed (particularly in western Tennessee), we recommend that you check rare species lists for adjacent counties or watersheds as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Crayfish News Volume 41 Issue 2: Page 1 Dear IAA Members Dauricus
    Summer Issue July 2019 Volume 41, Issue 2 p-ISSN: 1023-8174 (print) e-ISSN: 2150-9239 (online) Inside this issue Cover Story 1 President’s Corner 2 Meeting 3 announcements Short articles 5 Big Brother is watching - perhaps thankfully in 5 this case? A Record-sized Barbicambarus 6 cornutus Antique specimen of the Japanese crayfish 7 Cambaroides Japonicus Figure 1. Male specimen of Austropotamobius bihariensis. Literature of Interest 9 to Astacologists Recently, a new species of Austropotamobius were described as a new species of crayfish, was described in Europe. How could this named Austropotamobius bihariensis, after the species have remained hidden for such a long region of Biharia where the species is endemic. IAA online time, in a high research-activity area like The diagnostic morphological features are the Europe? lack of denticulation on the lower edge of the The highly divergent populations of the new antennal scale, a significantly shorter bell- crayfish species found in the Apuseni shaped rostrum, and fewer tubercles on the Mountains, Romania, were estimated to have palms of the chelae than its relatives split 15 million years ago from the Dinarides (Pârvulescu, 2019). and evolved in isolation due to the tectonic Historically, the populations of A. bihariensis north-eastern movement of the Tisza-Dacia were ascribed as A. torrentium, with no mega-unit (including the Apuseni Mountains) consideration that they might be different through the Pannonian Basin during the subspecies based on morphology (e.g., Băcescu, Miocene (Pârvulescu et al., 2019). Supported by 1967, Holdich et al., 2006). These populations morphological evidence, these populations (Continued on page5 ) Crayfish News Volume 41 Issue 2: Page 1 Dear IAA members dauricus.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dictionary of Non-Scientific Names of Freshwater Crayfishes (Astacoidea and Parastacoidea), Including Other Words and Phrases Incorporating Crayfish Names
    £\ A Dictionary of Non-Scientific Names of Freshwater Crayfishes (Astacoidea and Parastacoidea), Including Other Words and Phrases Incorporating Crayfish Names V5 C.W. HART, JR. SWF- SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ANTHROPOLOGY • NUMBER 38 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Folklife Studies Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world of science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]