Corporation Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Corporation Report ! Given By U. S. SUPT. OFLOCUAIENTS t 3^ THE UNITED STATES STRATEGIC BOMBING SURVEY if Tachikawa Aircraft Company (Tachikawa Hikoki K K) CORPORATION REPORT NO. X (Airframes) AIRCRAFT DIVISION February 1947 THE UNITED STATES STRATEGIC BOMBING SURVEY Tachikawa Aircraft Company ( Tachikawa Hikoki K K ) CORPORATION REPORT NO. X (Airframes) AIRCRAFT DIVISION Dates of Survey 20-24 November 1945 Date of Publication February 1947 ~'~J i*r3^ ( . U 1^ tfi I. WPERtNTENDEKT OF'OOC APR. 8 1947 This report was written primarily for the use of the United States Strategic Bombing Survey in the preparation of further reports of a more comprehensive nature. Any conclusions or opinions expressed in this report must be considered as limited to the specific material covered and as subject to further interpretation in the light of further studies conducted by the Survey. u : FOREWORD The United States Strategic Bombing Sur- civilians, 350 officers, and 500 enli-sted men. The vey was established by the Secretary of War on military segment of the organization was drawn 3 November 1944, pursuant to a directive from from the Army to the extent of 60 percent, and the late President Roosevelt. Its mission was to from the Navy to the extent of 40 percent. Both conduct an impartial and expert study of the the Army and the Navy gave the Survey all pos- effects of our aerial attack on Germany, to be sible assistance in furnishing men, supplies, used in connection with air attacks on Japan transport, and infoi-mation. The Survey oper- and to establish a basis for evaluating the im- ated from headquarters established in Tokyo portance and potentialities of air power as an early in September 1945, with subheadquarters instrument of military strategy for planning in Nagoya, Osaka, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki, the future development of the United States and with mobile teams operating in other parts armed forces and for determining future eco- of Japan, the islands of the Pacific, and the nomic policies with respect to the national Asiatic mainland. defense. A summary report and some 200 sup- It was possible to reconstruct much of war- porting reports containing the findings of the time Japanese military planning and execution, Survey in Germany have been published. engagement by engagement, and campaign by In 15 August 1945. President Truman re- campaign, and to secure reasonably accurate quested that the Survey conduct a similar study statistics on Japan's economy and war produc- tion, of the effects of all types of air attack in the plant by plant, and industry by industry. In war against Japan, submitting reports in dupli- addition, studies were conducted on Japan's over-all cate to the Secretary of War and to the Secre- strategic plans and the background of her tary of the Navy. The officers of the Survey entry into the war, the internal discussions during its Japanese phase were and negotiations leading to her acceptance of unconditional surrender, the course of health Franklin D'Olier, Chairman. and morale among the civilian population, the Paul H. Nitze, Henry C. Alexander, Vice effectiveness of the Japanese civilian defense or- Chairmen. ganization, and the effects of the atomic bombs. Harry L. Bowman, Separate reports will be issued covering each phase of J. Kenneth Galbraith, the study. Rensis Likert, The Survey interrogated more than 700 Japa- nese Frank A. McNamee, Jr., military, government, and industrial offi- cials. It Fred Searls, Jr., also recovered and translated many doc- Monroe E. Spaght, uments which not only have been useful to the Dr. Lewis R. Thompson, Survey, but also will furnish data valuable for Theodore P. Wright, Directors. other studies. Arrangements have been made to Walter Wilds, Secretary. turn over the Survey's files to the Central Intelli- gence Group, through which they will be avail- The Survey's complement provided for 300 able for further examination and distribution. m TABLE OF CONTENTS Page The Corporation and Its Importance in the Aircraft Industry The Air Attacks : 7 Production Statistics 12 Evaluation of Preattack Intelligence 20 Appendices : A—Tachikawa Plant Layout Facing page 22 B—Okayama Plant Layout 23 C—Kofu Plant Layout Facing page 24 D—Production 1929-40 25 E—Bomb Plot of Attack 17 February 1945 1. Facing page 26 F—Bomb Plot of Attack 4 April 1945 2. Facing page 26 G—Bomb Plot of Attack 24 April 1945 3. Facing page 26 H—Damage Plot of IB Attack 2 August 1945 4. Facing page 26 I—Air Attack Defense Map 5. Facing page 26 J—Production 1941-45 .__ 27 THE CORPORATION AND ITS IMPORTANCE IN THE AIRCRAFT INDUSTRY Introduction The Tachikawa Aircraft Co., Ltd. (Tachi- kawa Hikoki K K), which in 1944 produced approximately nine percent of Japanese air- craft, owned and operated three plants located at Tachikawa, Okayama and Kofu (Figure 1). (See insert on following page.) There was a total of about 3,600,000 sq. ft. of fioor space under roof, most of which was at Tachikawa, the third largest airframe plant in Japan. The company was founded in 1924. The first recorded production was one reconnaissance 88 in January 1929 in a small building on the southwest side of Tachikawa airfield. The rate of production on this plane varied from one to ten planes per month until mid-1932 when fighter 91 was added to bring total produc- tion in 1933 to 115. The relatively small size of the plant was shown by a total floor area in 1935 of 131,475 sq. ft. During 1940, production had grown to 1,000 planes a year (Appendix D) . This was after the great expansion program of that year, which added 1,650,280 sq. ft, to the plant area. Fur- ther additions brought the total area up to 3,131,800 sq. ft. (Table 1). Table 1 —Tachikawa Plan! Expansions Year Tachikawa Aircraft Co., Ltd. There was close contact with the MiUtary l-ij^ure 2.—Organization Chart, President .— Saburo Ando Division and later with the Air- Aeronautical Managing Director Masago Asakawa craft Division of the Munitions Ministry. There Tachikawa Plant is no record of direct financial aid having been Director Takashi Fujimoto - Moriyuki Nakagwa given to the corporation, but Director Fujimoto Assistant General Aflfairs Sigeo Kuriowa of the Tachikawa plant stated that the govern- Financial „ - Toshio Kawasaki Masaki ment directed banks to make loans for purposes Labor - Nobuyoshi - - Kikuo Tsuchiya of expansion. Material — Subcontractors -— Takeshi Hashida Control .....MinoruChiba Okayama Plant Organization and Operation Director...- .— - - .Kazuo Tsutsumi Subdirector Ryokichi Saburo Ando was the president of the Tachi- Production Hitoshi Nakamura kawa Aircraft Co., Ltd. ; Masago Asakwa was Kofu Plant Shiro Yoshiwara the managing director. The company had three Director Production.. Shoji Nomura divisions ; Tachikawa, directed by Takashi Assistant.— ..Motosuke Yoshiwada Fujimoto; Okayama, directed by Kazuo Tsut- The Sunagawa, or northern, section of Tachi- sumi, and Kofu, directed by Shiro Koshiwara kawa was the assembly part of the plant. Here (Figure 2). In the main, the Tachikawa plant were set up the Oscar and Hickory produc- furnished the engineering and technical staffs tion lines, and tooling up for Patsy was in for the corporation. process when the war ended (Figure 3). Oscar EIHAUST PIPES SOB *SS£Mai.T TflWIS PUIMBWO SHOP FVS£L*5E tSSEIiaLr S OCPE SHOP SUB assEMSL' SHEtHCTaL SHOP sscMBL. swy FiycwcsHOP Soe aSSEwBH MJC" SHOP-STpTu MOUSE FWttL ASSEMBLY FLfcrwg su ^TJTpnw S SXETIJETAt 5^ FWai. flSSe>WL' CONSTRUCTION LEGEND W WOOD CONSTRUCTDN S-CTECL FUME C ffEWOOCED CONCRETE ; ST;;jlTtGiC SO* TACMKAWA AIRCRAFT CO 704696—47—2 final assembly had four lines with 25 machines The Tachikawa plant went on a two-shift shifts work- on each line. Ideal assembly time was 10 days basis 1 March 1944. The were ten plant but actual time was 10 to 14 days. Hickory ing hours with one rest hour each. The inoperative from 0530 to 0730 each day. had two lines with 10 machines on each line. was That procedure affected 76 percent of the direct Ideal assembly time was 10 days and actual employees. At Kofu and Okayama, and at time was 10 to 12 days. Two-line production for Tachikawa prior to 1 March 1944, the single Patsy was planned with tooling undertaken, shift 0800 to 1800, with a noon rest hour, was but never was put into effect. Okayama and used. Kofu were not developed beyond the "job shop" At Tachikawa students and soldiers were stage. used from April 1944 until August 1945. Their Total number of employees expanded rapidly peak employment was in January and February from 9,000 in January 1941 to the peak of 31,- 1945 when 2,600 students and 150 soldiers 1944. At that time 30,500 were at 000 in May were employed. the newly opened Oka- Tachikawa and 500 at The number of man-hours worked by direct of those at yama plant. Approximately 5,000 laborers at Tachikawa reached a maximum of Tachikawa were being trained for Okayama 5,100,000 in April 1944 when men were being and Kofu production. At the close of produc- trained for employment at Okayama and Kofu 1945, Tachikawa employed 13,750 tion, August (Figure 7) . Okayama actually was in operation (Figure 4); Okayama 3,280 (Figure 5), and at that time but only 120,000 man hours were Kofu 2,170 (Figure 6). The big drop at Tachi- worked that month. As man-hours decreased at kawa was due to the transfer of 10,000 work- Tachikawa they increased at Okayama, reach- men to subcontractors. ing a maximum of 607,000 in June 1945 (Fig- 32 30 28 2S r" .
Recommended publications
  • Download (1450Kb)
    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES *** ** ** **** * Brussels, 19.03.1997 COM(97) l32 final 971 Oll3 (ACC) Proposal for a COUNCll.. REGULATION <EC> on aid (o certain shipyards under restructuring and amending Council Regulation 3094/95 (presented by the Commission) ...... -.:.... Introduction As stated in Council Regulation (EC) No. 1904/96 the relevant rules of the Seventh Cowl.<:ij Directive on aid to sbipbui1ding (90/684/EEC, further ea1led "the Directive") remain applica.ble pending the entry into force of the OBCD Sbipbui1cling Agreemerlt and until 31 December 1997 at the latest. · Under the Directive operating aid granted to shipyards, including contract-related production aid (whether direct or indirect)is .subject to a CODIOIOJl maximum lid eciJigg.-The QAly opmti.D& aid exempted from this ceiling are credit tacllities complying with the 1981 OECP Understanding on Export Credits for Sbips (Article 4.6) and aid granted as developnent assistance to developing countries (Article 4.7). · As regards investment aids the Directive reqllir.es that these UW$t be ·linked to a restnlCI".Wipg plan whicll does not involve any increase in the yard's .~.capacity or which nwst be directly linked to a correspondins irreversible reduction incapacity of other yards in the Member State .concerned. The prime yon<lit.ion for closure aid is that the resulting capacity reduction is of a genuine and irreversible nature. Apart from these general rules the Directive provided also for a llUII1ber of time- li.mited derogations for eertain ~ states which are now expired. However, in a nurilber of cases the targets of the underlying resttu<:turing programmes could not be achieved in the expected time frame or new developments on the markets require further measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of the Istanbul Process 16/18 for Combating Intolerance And
    2019 JAPAN SUMMARY REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS EVENT SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 3 PLENARY SESSIONS ................................................................................................................................. 7 LAUNCHING THE 2019 G20 INTERFAITH FORUM.......................................................................... 7 FORMAL FORUM INAUGURATION – WORKING FOR PEACE, PEOPLE, AND PLANET: CHALLENGES TO THE G20 ............................................................................................................... 14 WHY WE CAN HOPE: PEACE, PEOPLE, AND PLANET ................................................................. 14 ACTION AGENDAS: TESTING IDEAS WITH EXPERIENCE FROM FIELD REALITIES ........... 15 IDEAS TO ACTION .............................................................................................................................. 26 TOWARDS 2020 .................................................................................................................................... 35 CLOSING PLENARY ............................................................................................................................ 42 PEACE WORKING SESSIONS ................................................................................................................ 53 FROM VILE TO VIOLENCE: FREEDOM OF RELIGION & BELIEF & PEACEBUILDING ......... 53 THE DIPLOMACY OF RELIGIOUS PEACEBUILDING ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Blitz and Its Legacy
    THE BLITZ AND ITS LEGACY 3 – 4 SEPTEMBER 2010 PORTLAND HALL, LITTLE TITCHFIELD STREET, LONDON W1W 7UW ABSTRACTS Conference organised by Dr Mark Clapson, University of Westminster Professor Peter Larkham, Birmingham City University (Re)planning the Metropolis: Process and Product in the Post-War London David Adams and Peter J Larkham Birmingham City University [email protected] [email protected] London, by far the UK’s largest city, was both its worst-damaged city during the Second World War and also was clearly suffering from significant pre-war social, economic and physical problems. As in many places, the wartime damage was seized upon as the opportunity to replan, sometimes radically, at all scales from the City core to the county and region. The hierarchy of plans thus produced, especially those by Abercrombie, is often celebrated as ‘models’, cited as being highly influential in shaping post-war planning thought and practice, and innovative. But much critical attention has also focused on the proposed physical product, especially the seductively-illustrated but flawed beaux-arts street layouts of the Royal Academy plans. Reconstruction-era replanning has been the focus of much attention over the past two decades, and it is appropriate now to re-consider the London experience in the light of our more detailed knowledge of processes and plans elsewhere in the UK. This paper therefore evaluates the London plan hierarchy in terms of process, using new biographical work on some of the authors together with archival research; product, examining exactly what was proposed, and the extent to which the different plans and different levels in the spatial planning hierarchy were integrated; and impact, particularly in terms of how concepts developed (or perhaps more accurately promoted) in the London plans influenced subsequent plans and planning in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Old Path of Shipbuilding Onto the New Path of Offshore Wind Energy? the Case of Northern Germany
    Paper to be presented at the DRUID 2011 on INNOVATION, STRATEGY, and STRUCTURE - Organizations, Institutions, Systems and Regions at Copenhagen Business School, Denmark, June 15-17, 2011 From the old path of shipbuilding onto the new path of offshore wind energy? The case of northern Germany Dirk Fornahl Bremen Centre for Regional and Innovation Economics [email protected] Abstract Wind energy-related employment has been surging recently in Germany: it rose from 9,200 in 1997 to 90,000 in 2007 and is estimated to be 112,000 in 2020. The industry particularly emerged in coastal, northern Germany. Recently big hopes are particularly set on the offshore wind energy industry. Two recently discussed evolutionary concepts explain the emergence of new industries, such as wind energy, in space in different ways: the windows of locational opportunity concept stresses the locational freedom in the earliest stages of industrial development, whereas path creation emphasises the role of existing industrial development paths, such as shipbuilding, from which new paths, such as wind energy, emerge. The paper aims at analysing whether the new path of offshore wind energy emerged out of existing paths, mainly shipbuilding, in the five states of coastal Germany. It concludes that shipbuilding only indirectly affected the emergence of the new development path of offshore the wind energy industry in northern Germany. Jelcodes:R58,L64 From the old path of shipbuilding onto the new path of offshore wind energy? The case of northern Germany Abstract Wind energy-related employment has been surging recently in Germany: it rose from 9,200 in 1997 to 90,000 in 2007 and is estimated to be 112,000 in 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. FIRE AWAY Toward the End of World War II, the Allied Forces
    4. FIRE AWAY Toward the end of World War II, the Allied Forces shifted tactics from the relatively ineffective high-altitude precision bombing of military targets to low-altitude firebombing of urban areas. This new form of bombing involved dropping a combination of high-explosive bombs to break windows and incendiary bombs to start fires. Over the span of eleven days in the summer of 1943, British and American forces bombed Hamburg, Germany, multiple times in a campaign codenamed “Operation Gomorrah.” During the night of 27 July, a combination of weather conditions and concentrated bombing produced a firestorm that sucked all the oxygen out of the lower atmosphere, produced winds up to 150 mph and temperatures around 1,500ºF, and towered over 1,000 feet into the sky. No one had predicted a firestorm as a possible side-effect of the bombing. Over the course of Operation Gomorrah, the bombing and subsequent firestorm killed over 40,000 people, according an article about the operation in Air Force Magazine, 2007. The Allies conducted a similar campaign against Dresden, Germany, during three days in February 1945, while the German army was retreating from all fronts. Previous bombing raids had been conducted against the railroad classification yards in Dresden, but this campaign targeted the inner city. On the morning of 14 February, the bombing produced a firestorm similar to the one in Hamburg, with temperatures reaching 2,700ºF. German sources have the number of people killed ranging between 25,000 and 35,000. The actual number was probably closer to 45,000, according to an article called “Firebombing (Germany & Japan),” by Conrad C.
    [Show full text]
  • REFERENCE LIST Referencelist Surface Vessels 2017 Rev.05.Xlsx Page 2 of 10
    REFERENCE LIST Referencelist Surface vessels 2017 Rev.05.xlsx Page 2 of 10 No. Country Ship type Ship name Ship class Shipyard Year HVAC System HVAC CBRN Protection WaterChilled Plant Provision Cooling Plant Firefighting 1 Frigate El Moudamir MEKO A-200 TKMS 2016/17 X X X X X Algeria 2 Frigate Erradii MEKO A-200 TKMS 2016 X X X X X Tenix Defence System 3 Frigate Perth MEKO 200 2006 X X X X Williamstown Australia Tenix Defence System 4 Frigate Toowoomba MEKO 200 2005 X X X X Williamstown Tenix Defence System 5 Frigate Ballarat MEKO 200 2004 X X X X Williamstown Tenix Defence System 6 Frigate Parramatta MEKO 200 2003 X X X X Williamstown Tenix Defence System 7 Frigate Stuart MEKO 200 2002 X X X X Williamstown Tenix Defence System 8 Frigate Warramunga MEKO 200 2001 X X X X Williamstown Transfield 9 Frigate Arunta MEKO 200 1998 X X X X Williamstown Transfield 10 Frigate Anzac MEKO 200 1996 X X X X Williamstown Daewoo 11 Frigate F25 2000 X X Okpo Bangladesh 12 Peenewerft 13 Patrol forces Gravataí 12 Grajaú Class 2000 X X X Germany Brazil Peenewerft 14 Patrol forces Guaratuba 12 Grajaú Class 1999 X X X Germany Peenewerft 15 Patrol forces Gurupi 12 Grajaú Class 1996 X X X X Germany Peenewerft 16 Patrol forces Guajará 12 Grajaú Class 1995 X X X X Germany Referencelist Surface vessels 2017 Rev.05.xlsx Page 3 of 10 No. Country Ship type Ship name Ship class Shipyard Year HVAC System HVAC CBRN Protection WaterChilled Plant Provision Cooling Plant Firefighting Peenewerft 17 Patrol forces Guaporé 12 Grajaú Class 1995 X X X X Germany Brazil Peenewerft
    [Show full text]
  • Schlüssel Zur Welt
    IPW WORKING PAPER Institut für Politikwissenschaft Universität Bremen Sebastian Möller, Timo Gentes, Moritz Gohlke, Jan Jathe, Franziska Jung, Katherina Kenanidou, Luca Orlando (Hrsg.) Schlüssel zur Welt - Die bremischen Häfen in der Globalen Politischen Ökonomie #1 Inhaltsverzeichnis Vorwort der Senatorin für Wissenschaft und Häfen............................................................ 1 Vorwort der Studiendekanin des Fachbereichs Sozialwissenschaften ............................... 2 Vorwort der Geschäftsführerin des Instituts für Politikwissenschaft ................................ 3 1. Einleitung: Das Hafenseminar als lokale Spurensuche .................................................. 4 Sebastian Möller, Timo Gentes, Moritz Gohlke, Jan Jathe, Franziska Jung, Katherina Kenanidou & Luca Orlando Teil 1: Hafengeschichte 2. Bremische Hafengeschichte(n) & Hafennarrative ......................................................... 9 Sebastian Möller 3. Die Geschichte des Norddeutschen Lloyd ................................................................... 14 Katherina Kenanidou 4. Die bremische Container-Story.................................................................................... 18 Moritz Gohlke & Jan Jathe 5. Häfen als außerschulische Lernorte ............................................................................. 22 Jule Rump, Maike Bockwoldt & Jonas Brinkmann Teil 2: Welthandel & Schifffahrt 6. Aktuelle Trends in der Politischen Ökonomie des Welthandels ................................. 27 Sebastian Botzem 7.
    [Show full text]
  • US Bombing Strategy, the Destruction of Japanese Cities & the American
    Volume 5 | Issue 5 | Article ID 2414 | May 02, 2007 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus A Forgotten Holocaust: US Bombing Strategy, the Destruction of Japanese Cities & the American Way of War from World War II to Iraq Mark Selden A Forgotten Holocaust: US Bombing have these experiences shaped the Strategy, the Destruction of Japanese American way of war over six decades in Cities and the American Way of War which the United States has been a major from World War II to Iraq [*] actor in important wars? The issues have particular salience in an epoch whose Mark Selden central international discourse centers on terror and the War on Terror, one in World War II was a landmark in the which the terror inflicted on development and deployment ofnoncombatants by the major powers is technologies of mass destructionfrequently neglected. associated with air power, notably the Strategic Bombing and International B-29 bomber, napalm and the atomic Law bomb. An estimated 50 to 70 million people lay dead in its wake. In a sharp Bombs had been dropped from the air as reversal of the pattern of World War I early as 1849 on Venice (from balloons) and of most earlier wars, a substantial and 1911 in Libya (from planes). majority of the dead were noncombatants. [1] The air war, which reached peak intensity with the area bombing, including atomic bombing, of major European and Japanese cities in its final year, had a devastating impact on noncombatant populations. What is the logic and what have been the consequences—for its victims, for subsequent global patterns of warfare and for international law—of new technologies of mass destruction and their application associated with the rise of air power and bombing technology in World War II and after? Above all, how 1 5 | 5 | 0 APJ | JF however, proved extraordinarily elusive then and since.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipping Made in Hamburg
    Shipping made in Hamburg The history of the Hapag-Lloyd AG THE HISTORY OF THE HAPAG-LLOYD AG Historical Context By the middle of the 19th Century the industrial revolution has caused the disap- pearance of many crafts in Europe, fewer and fewer workers are now required. In a first process of globalization transport links are developing at great speed. For the first time, railways are enabling even ordinary citizens to move their place of residen- ce, while the first steamships are being tested in overseas trades. A great wave of emigration to the United States is just starting. “Speak up! Why are you moving away?” asks the poet Ferdinand Freiligrath in the ballad “The emigrants” that became something of a hymn for a German national mo- vement. The answer is simple: Because they can no longer stand life at home. Until 1918, stress and political repression cause millions of Europeans, among them many Germans, especially, to make off for the New World to look for new opportunities, a new life. Germany is splintered into backward princedoms under absolute rule. Mass poverty prevails and the lower orders are emigrating in swarms. That suits the rulers only too well, since a ticket to America produces a solution to all social problems. Any troublemaker can be sent across the big pond. The residents of entire almshouses are collectively despatched on voyage. New York is soon complaining about hordes of German beggars. The dangers of emigration are just as unlimited as the hoped-for opportunities in the USA. Most of the emigrants are literally without any experience, have never left their place of birth, and before the paradise they dream of, comes a hell.
    [Show full text]
  • Bombed, 128, 142, 160; Surrenders, 153 Aarhus: and an Air Attack, 209
    Index compiled by the author Aachen: bombed, 128, 142, 160; surrenders, 153 Armed Forces of the Committee for the Liberation of the Aarhus: and an air attack, 209 Peoples of Russia (VS-KONR): 176 Abbeville: 160 Armenians: 230 Abdul Kalam, A P.J.: quoted, 226 Arnhem: 163, 207, 210, 214 Abyssinia (Ethiopia): 16, 116, 206, 213, 222; war dead, Arromanches: 150, 151, 222 257 Ascension Island: 121 Acasta (destroyer): 131 Aschaffenburg: bombed, 167 ‘Ace of the Deep’: 91 ‘Asia Women’s Fund’: to make reparations, 200 Adam, Ken: 210 Assam: 192, 218, 244 Adenauer, Konrad: 240 Athens: 33, 34, 98, 107, 109; Churchill in, 220; liberated, Admiral Graf Spee: 5 162 Admiral Hipper: 83 Atlantic Charter: 220, 221 Admiral Scheer: 28, 83 Atlantic Ferry Organisation (ATFERO): 29 Adriatica (Displaced Persons’ (DP) camp): 238 Atlantic Ocean: 51, 52, 70, 74, 119, 120 Afric Star (merchant ship): sunk, 30 atom bomb: 134, 198, 222; dropped, 201, 202 African-American soldiers: in action, 168, 211 atrocities against civilians: 35, 40, 57, 59, 61, 79, 98, 100, Agent Zigzag: 117 101, 102, 103, 105, 106, 112, 156, 173, 192, 229, Akashi: bombed, 193 233 Alamein: 80, 109, 213, 226 Attlee, Clement: and Dresden, 175 Alaska-Canada (Alcan) Highway: 82 Attu Island: 82 Albania: 16, 33, 162, 209, 229, 230; war dead, 256 Aung San, General: leads resistance, 192 Albanian volunteers with the SS: 73 Auschwitz: 88, 90, 91, 101, 103, 109; deportations to, Alderney Island: 224 107, 158; revolt in, 108, 218; escapees from, and a Aleutian Islands: 56, 63, 82 bombing request, 158; evacuated,
    [Show full text]
  • Die Geschichte Des U-Boot-Bunkers „Valentin
    Marc Buggeln Der Bau des U-Boots-Bunker „Valentin“, der Einsatz von Zwangsarbeitern und die Beteiligung der Bevölkerung∗ ∗ Beim vorliegenden Text handelt es sich um eine stark erweiterte und aktualisierte Fassung meines Beitrages “Der Bunker Valentin. Zur Geschichte des Baus und des Lagersystems”, der in der Broschüre der Landeszentrale für politische Bildung in Bremen 2002 erschien. Marc Buggeln:Der Bau des U-Boots Bunker “Valentin”... 2 Den wichtigsten Grund für die Absicht der Kriegsmarine, U-Boot-Bunker in Deutschland zu bauen, bildete die zunehmende alliierte Lufthoheit, die zu immer zielgenaueren Angriffen auch auf die deutsche Werftindustrie führte. Nachdem 1942 bereits kleinere Bunker bei den Werften in Kiel und Hamburg entstanden waren, setzten Ende 1942 Überlegungen ein, auch bei den Bremer Werften U-Boot-Bunker zu schaffen.1 Vorgesehen für das Vorhaben waren die zum Krupp-Konzern gehörende Werft der Deschimag AG Weser und die zum Thyssen- Konzern gehörende Bremer Vulkan-Werft. Während der Bunker der Deschimag direkt am Werftgelände entstehen sollte,2 entschied man sich bei dem für den Vulkan geplanten Bunker für eine Verlegung des Baus nach Farge, ca. 10km weserabwärts von der Werft.3 Für den Bau der beiden Bunker richtete das Oberkommando der Kriegsmarine (OKM) ge- meinsam mit dem Reichsministerium für Bewaffnung und Munition (RMBuM)4 die Oberbau- leitung U-Weser (Unterweser) ein. Mit der Leitung wurde Marineoberbaurat Edo Meiners be- auftragt. In einer Besprechung beim OKM wurde er am 18. Dezember 1942 über seine neue Funktion und seine Aufgaben unterrichtet.5 Der Großteil des Personals wurde von der Marine gestellt. Die zentrale Steuerung unterstand aber dem RMBuM, Abteilung Rüstungsausbau, weil die U-Boot-Bunker mit in das gleichzeitig anlaufende Truppenbunker-Programm aufge- nommen wurden, welches als Sondermaßnahme dem Ministerium zugeordnet worden war.
    [Show full text]
  • Geschichte Der AG „Weser“
    in den Räumen des Arbeitervereins „Use Akschen“ im Untergeschoss des LICHTHAUSES, 28237 Bremen, Hermann-Prüser-Str. 4 Geschichte der AG „Weser“ 1843 Am 8.November wurde auf der ehemaligen Stephani-Kirchweide die Stahlbaufirma Waltjen & Leonhard gegründet. Zunächst wurden dort Heizungen, Brücken und andere Eisenteile von ca 500 Beschäftigten gebaut. 1846 nannte man die Firma in Waltjen & Co um. Es folgte der Bau der ersten Helling und der Bau von stählernen Baggerschiffen und Schuten. 1847 Fertigstellung des ersten Passagier-Seitenraddampfers „Roland“ für die Flussfahrt im Auftrag der B. G. Schünemann A.G mit der Bau-Nr. 1. 1851 stellte Carsten Waltjen die eisernen Schwimmtore für die Schleuse des Neuen Hafens von Bremerhaven her. 1857 Fertigstellung des zweiten Passagier-Seitenraddampfers „Werra“ für die Flussfahrt im Auftrag des Norddeutschen Lloyd (NDL) 1865 Fertigstellung des ersten seetüchtigen Passagierdampfers „Nordsee“ (46,94 m x 6,71 m) im Auftrag des Norddeutschen Lloyd 1871 Fertigstellung des ersten Spierentorpedobootes „I“ im Auftrag der Kaiserlichen Marine 1872 wurde die Firma unter Beteiligung von Bremer Kaufleuten und Reedern in die Actien-Gesellschaft "Weser" umgewandelt. Die neue Firmenleitung steigerte die Rüstungsproduktion bis 1905 auf einen Anteil von 50%. Die AG “Weser“ kam bis 1901 auf eine Beschäftigtenzahl von ca 1500. 1905 zog die AG „Weser“ mit ca 500 Beschäftigten nach Gröpelingen auf ein neues Gelände um, das seit 1886 im Zuge der Weserbegradigung durch Franzius entstanden war. 1908 Fertigstellung des Großkreuzers „Gneisenau“ im Auftrag der Kaiserlichen Marine mit der Bau-Nr. 144, ca 4000 Beschäftigte 1910 ca 2000 Beschäftigte 1911 Fertigstellung des Frachtdampfers "Arnfried" für die Hamburg-Bremer Afrika-Linie.
    [Show full text]