DOCSLIB.ORG

Performance Based Navigation (PBN)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Performance Based Navigation (PBN) Presented to: ICAO PBN Workshop for Air Traffic Controllers Michael Watkins, Senior Air Traffic Representative – Asia/Pacific 13-15 June 2017, Beijing, China Overview • Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) • Performance Based Navigation (PBN) • Real World Examples • Stakeholders in the PBN Procedure Development Process • Aircraft Equipage • Area Navigation (RNAV) Departures (SID) • Optimized Profile Descents (OPD) • Flight Management Systems (FMS) • PBN/RNAV Reference Materials Next Generation Air Transportation System - NextGen Integrates new and existing technologies, policies and procedures to enhance safety, save fuel, and reduce delays to deliver a more reliable travel experience. SAVES FUEL NextGen Benefits Reduced Environmental Impact NextGen will reduce aviation’s environmental footprint through a combination of enhanced air traffic procedures, and other measures to make continual improvements. The efficiencies that reduce delays also save fuel and reduce emissions. A key component of NextGen is Performance Based Navigation (PBN) Performance Based Navigation (PBN) History of PBN 2003 2004 2006 2009 2012 • Industry requests the establishment of an RNAV/RNP Program at FAA- RTCA Spring Forum 2002 • FAA Administrator issued a policy statement committing FAA to aggressively pursue the implementation of RNAV and RNP in the National Airspace System - July 22, 2002 • Roadmap initiatives incorporated into NextGen Implementation Plan and FAA Enterprise Architecture - 2008/2009 • NextGen Implementation Plan – March 2012 Performance Based Navigation (PBN) • Navigation based on specified system performance requirements for aircraft operating on an air traffic route, instrument approach procedure, or in a designated airspace. • Potential for aircraft to demonstrate requirements compliance through a mix of capabilities, rather than only specific equipment. PBN makes key distinctions between RNAV and RNP RNAV vs RNP RNAV NO ALERT TO PILOT Route Width Route Centerline RNP ALERT TO PILOT Route Width Route Centerline RNAV/RNP Accuracy Values (Not to be confused with separation standards) Oceanic and remote continental airspace is currently served by two navigation applications, RNAV 10 and RNP 4. En-Route airspace in the U.S. is designated RNAV 2 8 NM Route Width/ RNAV 2 Protected Airspace Terminal airspace is designated RNAV 1 4 NM Route Width/ RNAV 1 Protected Airspace RNP Approach specifications require a standard navigation accuracy of RNP 1 in the initial, intermediate and missed segments and RNP 0.3 in the final RF Leg (Curved) segment. Performance Based Navigation: A Key Building Block of NextGen Conventional RNAV RNP Narrower Waypoints protected areas Current Ground- Based Seamless NAVAIDs Vertical Path Curved Paths Limited Design Increased Airspace Optimized Flexibility Efficiency Use of Airspace What Do Waypoints Do? • Waypoints specify a geographic location in terms of latitude and longitude used for route definition, or as a reporting point. • A waypoint may be used to indicate changes in: – Speed – Altitude – Direction Types of Waypoints Distance of Turn Anticipation (DTA) Fly-by Fly-over PBN Implementation RNAV 2 RNAV 1 Q Routes & RNAV 1 RNAV and RNP AR SIDs T Routes STARs (RNP 0.1-0.3) Approaches An integrated procedures concept will provide a framework for integration of PBN initiatives from departure to approach (including en route). Integration of Procedures Applications for De-confliction, Optimization and Benefits Segregate traffic flows Between arrival/departure and transition operations Between primary and satellite airport operations Between city pairs Benefits of PBN RNAV or RNP procedure implementation can provide benefits in one or more of the following areas: Safety Throughput Efficiency Access Environment Benefits of PBN Safety • More accurate and reliable lateral and vertical paths. • Enables reduced obstacle clearance criteria Allows new three-dimensional guided arrival, approach and departure procedures • Enhances consistency of traffic flow. • Reduces the risk of communication errors. Benefits of PBN Throughput • Reduced delays at airports and in crowded airspace through: Procedurally de-conflicted arrival and departure routes Parallel routes Additional ingress/egress points around busy terminal areas Improved flight rerouting capabilities Development of closely spaced procedures for more efficient use of airspace De-conflicting adjacent airport flows Benefits of PBN Efficiency • Enhanced reliability, repeatability, and predictability of operations increases air traffic throughput. More precise arrival, approach, and departure procedures reduce track dispersion and facilitate smoother traffic flows Less restrictive climb and descent gradients with shorter and more predictable ground tracks Benefits of PBN Access • Obstacle clearance and environmental constraints can be better accommodated through the application of optimized flight tracks. • Reduced obstacle clearance criteria and more accurate path keeping can allow improved three- dimensional guided arrival, approach and departure procedures at airports (lower minima). Benefits of PBN Environment • Fuel efficiencies and reduced emissions can be achieved through: Reduced ground delays resulting from the increased efficiency of departure flows Improved flight profiles • Flight tracks can be designed to avoid noise- sensitive areas. Integrated Procedure Development En Route Terminal Integrated STAR and SID procedures More efficient routing Optimal operation of primary and Reduced delays with increased satellite airports without Multiple Q routes for better throughput, predictability and interference utilization of available airspace flexibility of the system More efficient management of Seamless integration of TRACON flows via additional Direct routes between TRACON and En Route ingress/egress waypoints busy city/TRACON pairs domains Reduction in bottlenecks and Fuel efficient delay propagation routing Reduced overall noise and emissions 21 PBN Real World Examples Atlanta (ATL) Departure BEFORE RNAV Procedures Before and After • Approximately 94% of daily departures are RNAV-capable. • More departure lanes and exit points to the en route airspace. Capacity gain of 9-12 departures AFTER RNAV per hour • Repeatable and predictable paths. • Benefits: Increased throughput Reduced departure delays $30M annual benefit Post-RNAV Implementation ATL Communications Reduced up to: • 40% for Departure Controller with RNAV SID • 50% for Approach Controller with RNAV STARs Dallas/Fort Worth Pre Implementation Straight-out International (DFW) Conventional Departure Operations • RNAV enabled diverging Line-up s departures at DFW. queues • Diverging departures allow for the application of same runway Conventional separation standards reducing Departures inter-departure times. Post Diverging Implementation RNAV • Increase in departure capacity. Departure 11 to 20 additional operations per hour Operations 45% reduction in delay during peak Aircraft in s demand #1 position Increased departure capacity results in approximately $8.5M to $12.9M in delay savings per year. RNAV Departures Stakeholders in the PBN Procedure Development Process • PBN Policy and Support Procedure Proponents Group • Aviation System Standards National • Flight Standards Initiatives • Aircraft Certification Lead Operators • Lead Operator • ATC Facilities Airports and/or • Service Center Air Traffic Facilities Ops Support Group Environmental Office Safety Management Office Industry User Groups • Airport Authority Aircraft Equipage B-737 Cockpit MODE CONTROL UNIT (MCU) PRIMARY FLIGHT DISPLAY (PFD) MULTI FUNCTION DISPLAY (MFD) CONTROL DISPLAY UNIT (CDU) Airbus 380 Cockpit Flight Management System (FMS) • All FMS contain a navigation database, the elements from which the flight plan is constructed. These databases are defined via the ARINC 424 standard and are normally updated every 28 days. • FMS capabilities are an integral part of RNAV/RNP procedures. RNP • A defining characteristic of RNP operations is the ability of the aircraft to monitor the navigation performance and inform the crew if the required aircraft performance is not met during an operation. • This on-board monitoring and alerting capability enhances the pilot’s situational awareness and can enable reduced obstacle clearance. RNAV SID RNAV SID Benefits • Shorter and more predictable ground tracks • Reduced frequency congestion • Repeatable flight paths Radar Vector SID SIDs That Use Radar Vectors to Join RNAV Routes • RNAV operations offer significant advantages in establishing routes for departures. • Radar vectoring affords flexibility of routing and allows an aircraft to attain sufficient altitude/distance to achieve a satisfactory navigation solution prior to using RNAV. Air Traffic (AT) may use radar vectors to pre-position departing aircraft prior to authorizing RNAV. Optimized Profile Descent (OPD) RNAV STAR Optimized Profile Descent (OPD) • A descent profile procedure normally associated with a published STAR. – It starts at Top of Descent and, to the extent possible, comprises idle power descents that minimize thrust required to remain on the vertical path. – The termination point may be on an instrument approach procedure to allow for a continuous descent from the STAR to the runway, or at a point in space that allows for radar vectoring. • OPDs are designed to allow use of aircraft automation and piloting techniques to maximize fuel efficiency and minimize environmental impact.
Recommended publications
  • RNAV Instrument Approach Procedures (IAP's) and the New Charting Format

    RNAV Instrument Approach Procedures (IAP's) and the New Charting Format

    Effective: Until Further Notice Area Navigation Systems Area Navigation (RNAV)/Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) Instrument Approach Procedures (IAP’s) and the New Charting Format. [REVISED 1/5/00] PURPOSE. Instrument procedures in the first half of the 21st century will be based on satellite navigation, also known as Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). Within the United States, the Global Positioning System (GPS), the Wide Area Augmentation system (WAAS), and the Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS) will comprise the primary components of the GNSS. Air navigation is increasingly dependent upon RNAV systems - as exemplified by Flight Management System (FMS) and Global Positioning System (GPS) avionics. These systems navigate with reference to geographic positions called “waypoints” (WP) specified in latitude/longitude rather than to/from a specific ground-based navigation aid. Reliance on RNAV systems for approach and departure operations will increase as new systems such as WAAS are developed and deployed. To foster and support full and optimal integration of RNAV into the National Airspace System (NAS), the FAA has developed a new procedure type for RNAV IAP’s. This Notice serves to inform the flying public of the new concepts being implemented with the RNAV IAP’s. OPERATIONS. In order to avoid unnecessary duplication and proliferation of instrument approach charts, Jeppesen will publish approach minimums for unaugmented GPS and WAAS (when operational) on the same chart. In addition, approach minimums will be established and published for LNAV/ VNAV - a new type of RNAV instrument approach with lateral and vertical navigation. The approach chart will be titled "RNAV RWY XX." The chart may contain as many as four columns of approach minimums: GLS; LNAV/VNAV; LNAV; and CIRCLING.
  • Using an Autothrottle to Compare Techniques for Saving Fuel on A

    Using an Autothrottle to Compare Techniques for Saving Fuel on A

    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2010 Using an autothrottle ot compare techniques for saving fuel on a regional jet aircraft Rebecca Marie Johnson Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Johnson, Rebecca Marie, "Using an autothrottle ot compare techniques for saving fuel on a regional jet aircraft" (2010). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 11358. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/11358 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Using an autothrottle to compare techniques for saving fuel on A regional jet aircraft by Rebecca Marie Johnson A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Electrical Engineering Program of Study Committee: Umesh Vaidya, Major Professor Qingze Zou Baskar Ganapathayasubramanian Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2010 Copyright c Rebecca Marie Johnson, 2010. All rights reserved. ii DEDICATION I gratefully acknowledge everyone who contributed to the successful completion of this research. Bill Piche, my supervisor at Rockwell Collins, was supportive from day one, as were many of my colleagues. I also appreciate the efforts of my thesis committee, Drs. Umesh Vaidya, Qingze Zou, and Baskar Ganapathayasubramanian. I would also like to thank Dr.
  • Ac 120-67 3/18/97

    Ac 120-67 3/18/97

    Advisory u.s. Department ofTransportation Federal Aviation Circular Ad.nnlstratlon Subject: CRITERIA FOR OPERATIONAL Date: 3/18/97 AC No: 120-67 APPROVAL OF AUTO FLIGHT Initiated By: AFS-400 Change: GUIDANCE SYSTEMS 1. PURPOSE. This advisory circular (AC) states an acceptable means, but not the only means, for obtaining operational approval of the initial engagement or use of an Auto Flight Guidance System (AFGS) under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 121, section 121.579(d); part 125, section 125.329(e); and part 135, section 135.93(e) for the takeoff and initial climb phase of flight. 2. APPLICABILITY. The criteria contained in this AC are applicable to operators using commercial turbojet and turboprop aircraft holding Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) operating authority issued under SPAR 38-2 and 14 CFR parts 119, 121, 125, and 135. The FAA may approve the AFGS operation for the operators under these parts, where necessary, by amending the applicant's operations specifications (OPSPECS). 3. BACKGROUND. The purpose of this AC is to take advantage of technological improvements in the operational capabilities of autopilot systems, particularly at lower altitudes. This AC complements a rule change that would allow the use of an autopilot, certificated and operationally approved by the FAA, at altitudes less than 500 feet above ground level in the vertical plane and in accordance with sections 121.189 and 135.367, in the lateral plane. 4. DEFINITIONS. a. Airplane Flight Manual (AFM). A document (under 14 CFR part 25, section 25.1581) which is used to obtain an FAA type certificate.
  • Performance-Based Navigation (PBN)

    Performance-Based Navigation (PBN)

    What Is PBN? Evolution to PBN Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) is comprised Current Ground NAVAIDs RNAV RNP Federal Aviation of Area Navigation (RNAV) and Required Navigation Waypoints Administration Performance (RNP) and describes an aircraft’s capa- Seamless Vertical bility to navigate using performance standards. Path What Is RNAV? “Curved” Paths RNAV enables aircraft to fly on any desired flight path within the coverage of ground- or spaced-based navigation aids, within the limits of the capability of Limited Design Increased Airspace Highly Optimized the self-contained systems, or a combination of both Flexibility Efficiency Use of Airspace Performance-Based capabilities. RNAV aircraft have better access and flexibility for point-to-point operations. Navigation (PBN) Resources What Is OPD? FAA RNAV/RNP Group Web Site Optimized Profile Descent (OPD) is designed to http://faa.gov/ato?k=pbn reduce fuel consumption, emissions, and noise dur- ing descent by allowing pilots to set aircraft engines FAA Next Generation Air Transportation System near idle throttle while they descend. OPDs use the http://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/nextgen capabilities of the aircraft Flight Management System to fly a continuous, descending path without level seg- ICAO PBN Programme Office ments. Where possible, we are implementing OPDs www.icao.int/pbn with RNAV to make them environmentally-friendly or “green.” Contact us at: [email protected] What Is RNP? RNP is RNAV with the addition of an onboard perfor- mance monitoring and alerting capability. A defining characteristic of RNP operations is the ability of the aircraft navigation system to monitor the navigation performance it achieves and inform the crew if the requirement is not met during an operation.
  • Chapter: 4. Approaches

    Chapter: 4. Approaches

    Chapter 4 Approaches Introduction This chapter discusses general planning and conduct of instrument approaches by pilots operating under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) Parts 91,121, 125, and 135. The operations specifications (OpSpecs), standard operating procedures (SOPs), and any other FAA- approved documents for each commercial operator are the final authorities for individual authorizations and limitations as they relate to instrument approaches. While coverage of the various authorizations and approach limitations for all operators is beyond the scope of this chapter, an attempt is made to give examples from generic manuals where it is appropriate. 4-1 Approach Planning within the framework of each specific air carrier’s OpSpecs, or Part 91. Depending on speed of the aircraft, availability of weather information, and the complexity of the approach procedure Weather Considerations or special terrain avoidance procedures for the airport of intended landing, the in-flight planning phase of an Weather conditions at the field of intended landing dictate instrument approach can begin as far as 100-200 NM from whether flight crews need to plan for an instrument the destination. Some of the approach planning should approach and, in many cases, determine which approaches be accomplished during preflight. In general, there are can be used, or if an approach can even be attempted. The five steps that most operators incorporate into their flight gathering of weather information should be one of the first standards manuals for the in-flight planning phase of an steps taken during the approach-planning phase. Although instrument approach: there are many possible types of weather information, the primary concerns for approach decision-making are • Gathering weather information, field conditions, windspeed, wind direction, ceiling, visibility, altimeter and Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs) for the airport of setting, temperature, and field conditions.
  • ICAO Version Finale

    ICAO Version Finale

    Thales Presentation > ICAO NGAP Symposium March 2010 Francis ARCHAMBAULT – Director, Marketing and Product Policy Benoît THUBERT – Advance Project Design Authority Aerospace Agenda THALES Avionics system development in recent History AIRBUS, BOMBARDIER, GULFSTREAM, ATR, EMBRAER, SUKHOI Interactive Cockpit Display Systems, Flight Management Systems, Integrated Modular Avionics, Electronic Flight Controls Computers, Head-Up Displays, Enhanced Vision Systems, IFE. THALES Innovation NEW TECHNOLOGIES Flight Deck Innovation Strategy, Global Environment – Thales actions & major Industry initiatives, R&D and emerging technologies – some considerations, Avionics evolving Business Model, New generation of flight crew & new approach to develop flight deck, Competency and training methods, Bridging the gap between pilots and systems, New interaction languages, Helping pilots to handle complexity. March 2010 March THALES Training Technologies 2 This document is the property of Thales Group and may not be copi ed or communicated without written consent of Thales > Thales Recent Avionics developments Aerospace Thales - intelligence onboard Connectivity - SATCOM Integrated Modular Avionics Cockpit Display + HUD + EVS Electrical Power Flight Guidance Generation / Conversion Flight Management Communication, Navigation, Surveillance Flight Controls Utilities: Braking Steering Fuel Engine Controls In-Flight Entertainment Systems Doors & Slides Cabin lighting March 2010 March Integrated Maintenance Cabin interiors floor to floor 4 This document
  • Chapter: 2. En Route Operations

    Chapter: 2. En Route Operations

    Chapter 2 En Route Operations Introduction The en route phase of flight is defined as that segment of flight from the termination point of a departure procedure to the origination point of an arrival procedure. The procedures employed in the en route phase of flight are governed by a set of specific flight standards established by 14 CFR [Figure 2-1], FAA Order 8260.3, and related publications. These standards establish courses to be flown, obstacle clearance criteria, minimum altitudes, navigation performance, and communications requirements. 2-1 fly along the centerline when on a Federal airway or, on routes other than Federal airways, along the direct course between NAVAIDs or fixes defining the route. The regulation allows maneuvering to pass well clear of other air traffic or, if in visual meteorogical conditions (VMC), to clear the flightpath both before and during climb or descent. Airways Airway routing occurs along pre-defined pathways called airways. [Figure 2-2] Airways can be thought of as three- dimensional highways for aircraft. In most land areas of the world, aircraft are required to fly airways between the departure and destination airports. The rules governing airway routing, Standard Instrument Departures (SID) and Standard Terminal Arrival (STAR), are published flight procedures that cover altitude, airspeed, and requirements for entering and leaving the airway. Most airways are eight nautical miles (14 kilometers) wide, and the airway Figure 2-1. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 14 Aeronautics and Space. flight levels keep aircraft separated by at least 500 vertical En Route Navigation feet from aircraft on the flight level above and below when operating under VFR.
  • Accessibility to In-Flight Entertainment for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Passengers Michael A

    Accessibility to In-Flight Entertainment for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Passengers Michael A

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Southern Methodist University Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 77 | Issue 1 Article 3 2012 Propelling Aviation to New Heights: Accessibility to In-Flight Entertainment for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Passengers Michael A. Schwartz Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Michael A. Schwartz, Propelling Aviation to New Heights: Accessibility to In-Flight Entertainment for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Passengers, 77 J. Air L. & Com. 151 (2012) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol77/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. PROPELLING AVIATION TO NEW HEIGHTS: ACCESSIBILITY TO IN-FLIGHT ENTERTAINMENT FOR DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING PASSENGERS MICHAEL A. SCHWARTZ* TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................... 151 I. INTRODUCTION .................................. 152 II. AIR CARRIER ACCESS ACT OF 1986 ............. 157 III. COURTS DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE A PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION ............................... 162 IV. THE LACK OF CONGRESSIONAL ACTION ...... 165 V. THE DOT'S INACTION REGARDING IFE CAPTIONING ...................................... 166 VI. THE IRONY: ACCESSIBLE IN-FLIGHT ENTERTAINMENT IS AVAILABLE NOW ......... 171 VII. A CALL TO ACTION .............................. 174 ABSTRACT In-flight entertainment has been available for over forty-five years but to this day remains without captions or subtitles, thus depriving deaf and hard of hearing passengers of access to this service.
  • Accessibility to In-Flight Entertainment for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Passengers Michael A

    Accessibility to In-Flight Entertainment for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Passengers Michael A

    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 77 | Issue 1 Article 3 2012 Propelling Aviation to New Heights: Accessibility to In-Flight Entertainment for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Passengers Michael A. Schwartz Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Michael A. Schwartz, Propelling Aviation to New Heights: Accessibility to In-Flight Entertainment for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Passengers, 77 J. Air L. & Com. 151 (2012) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol77/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. PROPELLING AVIATION TO NEW HEIGHTS: ACCESSIBILITY TO IN-FLIGHT ENTERTAINMENT FOR DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING PASSENGERS MICHAEL A. SCHWARTZ* TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................... 151 I. INTRODUCTION .................................. 152 II. AIR CARRIER ACCESS ACT OF 1986 ............. 157 III. COURTS DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE A PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION ............................... 162 IV. THE LACK OF CONGRESSIONAL ACTION ...... 165 V. THE DOT'S INACTION REGARDING IFE CAPTIONING ...................................... 166 VI. THE IRONY: ACCESSIBLE IN-FLIGHT ENTERTAINMENT IS AVAILABLE NOW ......... 171 VII. A CALL TO ACTION .............................. 174 ABSTRACT In-flight entertainment has been available for over forty-five years but to this day remains without captions or subtitles, thus depriving deaf and hard of hearing passengers of access to this service. The Air Carrier Access Act of 1986 (ACAA) and imple- menting regulations do not require captioning of in-flight en- tertainment, and Congress, the airline industry, and the U.S.
  • The GE 2584 CDU Series Provides a Control Display Interface to the Flight Management System and Other Avionics Subsystems

    The GE 2584 CDU Series Provides a Control Display Interface to the Flight Management System and Other Avionics Subsystems

    The GE 2584 CDU series provides a control display interface to the flight management system and other avionics subsystems. GE Aviation 2584 CDU series includes The CDU software can be updated via Features: CDU and ARINC 739A compatible MCDU a standard ARINC 615 Airborne Data • Full Color LCD Display offerings. The CDUs are designed for high Loader to accommodate modifications • Multifunction Capability utility and broad functionality, and can to the Operation Flight Program (OFP). act as interface unit to support various GE’s CDUs feature a Liquid Crystal Display • ARINC 615 Data Loader compatible aircraft applications. The CDU is standard (LCD) and is ARINC 739 compatible with • Communicates with multiple production on Boeing 737 Commercial graphical interface growth capability. FMCs and additional ports for and Business Jets, KC-46 Pegasus The CDU receives and presents color text communications with other Transport and Tanker Aircraft, and the commands. systems such as ACARS P-8A Poseidon Multi-Mission Maritime • ARINC 739/429 compatible Aircraft. A touchscreen version of the CDU • Highly reliable, compact design is under development to support a flexible • Designed for ease of growth to interface for advanced applications. accommodate new features The broad utility of the CDU permits • Alternate backup navigation applications as a control display unit for the Flight Management System, ACARS, Digital Flight Recorder or SATCOM. The unit communicates using ARINC 739 protocol over an ARINC 429 bus. As an option the CDU can provide backup navigation radio tuning, EFIS control and interfaces and/or backup navigation with Global Positioning System (GPS) or Inertial Reference System (IRS).
  • Hawker 800XP Pro Line 21 Airplane Flight Manual SECTION 2 LIMITATIONS Table of Contents Page

    Hawker 800XP Pro Line 21 Airplane Flight Manual SECTION 2 LIMITATIONS Table of Contents Page

    Hawker 800XP Pro Line 21 Airplane Flight Manual SECTION 2 LIMITATIONS Table of Contents Page KINDS OF OPERATION.................................................................................... 3 WEIGHT LIMITATIONS ..................................................................................... 3 PERFORMANCE LIMITATIONS ....................................................................... 3 Take-off Weight........................................................................................... 3 Landing Weight .......................................................................................... 3 Take-off Field Length .................................................................................. 4 OPERATIONAL LIMITATIONS.......................................................................... 4 Altitude ........................................................................................................ 4 Maximum Permissible Altitude .................................................................... 4 Air Temperature .......................................................................................... 4 Wind Component ........................................................................................ 4 Runway Slope ............................................................................................. 5 Airplane Configurations............................................................................... 5 COMPARTMENT LOADING LIMITATIONS ...................................................... 5
  • Category 7—Page 1

    Category 7—Page 1

    Commerce Control List Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 Category 7—page 1 CATEGORY 7 - NAVIGATION AND accelerometers that are “specially AVIONICS designed” and developed as Measurement While Drilling (MWD) sensors for use in downhole well service applications. A. “END ITEMS,” “EQUIPMENT,” Related Definitions: N/A “ACCESSORIES,” “ATTACHMENTS,” Items: “PARTS,” “COMPONENTS,” AND “SYSTEMS” a. Linear accelerometers having any of the following: N.B.1: For automatic pilots for underwater a.1. Specified to function at linear vehicles, see Category 8. For radar, see acceleration levels less than or equal to 15 g and Category 6. having any of the following: a.1.a. A “bias” “stability” of less 7A001 Accelerometers as follows (see List of (better) than 130 micro g with respect to a fixed Items Controlled) and “specially designed” calibration value over a period of one year; or “components” therefor. a.1.b. A “scale factor” “stability” of less License Requirements (better) than 130 ppm with respect to a fixed calibration value over a period of one year; Reason for Control: NS, MT, AT a.2. Specified to function at linear Country acceleration levels exceeding 15 g but less than Chart (See or equal to 100 g and having all of the following: Control(s) Supp. No. 1 to part 738) a.2.a. A “bias” “repeatability” of less NS applies to entire entry NS Column 1 (better) than 1,250 micro g over a period of one MT applies to commodities MT Column year; and that meet or exceed the 1 parameters of 7A101. a.2.b. A “scale factor” “repeatability” AT applies to entire entry AT Column 1 of less (better) than 1,250 ppm over a period of one year; or List Based License Exceptions (See Part 740 for a description of all license exceptions) a.3.