2014 ALP Appendix A-Glossary of Terms
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
FAA) Privacy Impact Assessment Service Availability Prediction Tool (SAPT)
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administraiton (FAA) Privacy Impact Assessment Service Availability Prediction Tool (SAPT) Responsible Official David E. Gray Program Manager [email protected] Approving Official Claire W. Barrett Chief Privacy & Information Asset Officer Office of the Chief Information Officer [email protected] 0 U.S. Department of Transportation Executive Summary On May 28, 2010, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) published the Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) final rule mandating that aircraft flying in certain controlled airspace be equipped with ADS-B Out capability not later than January 1, 2020.1 In turn, the FAA developed the Service Availability Prediction Tool (SAPT) to assist pilots, dispatchers, and commercial operators in checking their predicted navigation and surveillance availability before a flight as well as handle requests for Air Traffic Control (ATC) authorization pursuant to 14 CFR § 91.225(g). The SAPT has three main components: Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM) SAPT, Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) SAPT, and ADS-B Deviation Authorization Pre-Flight Tool (ADAPT). This Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) was developed pursuant to Section 208 of the E-Government Act of 2002 because the SAPT includes a web-based capability to collect and manage Personally Identifiable Information (PII) captured from aircraft operators to facilitate the automated handling of ATC authorization requests and FAA’s responses. What is a Privacy Impact Assessment? The Privacy Act of 1974 articulates concepts for how the federal government should treat individuals and their information and imposes duties upon federal agencies regarding the collection, use, dissemination, and maintenance of personally identifiable information (PII). -
Aviation Definitions
Aviation Definitions: A Air Carrier - A commercial airline with published schedules operating at least five round trips per week. Airport Layout Plan (ALP) - The official, FAA approved map of an airport's facilities Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC)- A facility providing air traffic control to aircraft on an IFR flight plan within controlled airspace and principally during the enroute phase of flight. Air Taxi - An aircraft certificated for commercial service available for hire on demand. Air Traffic Control (ATC)- The control of aircraft traffic, in the vicinity of airports from control towers, and in the airways between airports from control centers Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT)- A central operations tower in the terminal air traffic control system with an associated IFR room if radar equipped, using air/ground communications and/or radar, visual signaling and other devices to provide safe, expeditious movement of air traffic. Altitude MSL - Aircraft altitude measured in feet above mean sea level. Approach Lighting System (ALS) - Radiating light beams guiding pilots to the extended centerline of the runway on final approach and landing. Approach Lights - High intensity lights located along the approach path at the end of an instrument runway. Approach lights aid the pilot in the transition from instrument flight conditions to visual conditions at the end of an instrument approach. Arrival - The act of landing at an airport. Arrival Procedure - A series of directions from air traffic control, using fixes and procedures, to guide an aircraft from the enroute environment to an airport for landing. Arrival Stream - A flow of aircraft following similar arrival procedures. -
Instrument Standard Operating Procedures
INSTRUMENT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES INTRODUCTION PRE-FLIGHT ACTIONS BASIC INSTRUMENT MANEUVERS UNUSUAL ATTITUDE RECOVERY HOLDING PROCEDURES INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION AND THEORY .......................................................................................................... 1 PRE-FLIGHT ACTIONS ........................................................................................................................ 3 IMC WEATHER ................................................................................................................................... 3 PRE-FLIGHT INSTRUMENT CHECKS ......................................................................................... 3 BASIC INSTRUMENT MANEUVERS ................................................................................................... 6 STRAIGHT AND LEVEL FLIGHT (SLF) ......................................................................................... 6 CHANGES OF AIRSPEEDS .......................................................................................................... 8 CONSTANT AIRSPEED CLIMBS AND DESCENTS ..................................................................... 9 CONSTANT RATE CLIMBS AND DESCENTS ............................................................................ 10 TIMED TURNS TO MAGNETIC COMPASS HEADINGS ............................................................ 12 MAGNETIC COMPASS TURNS ................................................................................................. -
NORWAY LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2020 1 - Implementation Overview
LSSIP 2020 - NORWAY LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2020 1 - Implementation Overview Document Title LSSIP Year 2020 for Norway Info Centre Reference 20/12/22/79 Date of Edition 07/04/2021 LSSIP Focal Point Peder BJORNESET - [email protected] Luftfartstilsynet (CAA-Norway) LSSIP Contact Person Luca DELL’ORTO – [email protected] EUROCONTROL/NMD/INF/PAS LSSIP Support Team [email protected] Status Released Intended for EUROCONTROL Stakeholders Available in https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Reference Documents LSSIP Documents https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Master Plan Level 3 – Plan https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Edition 2020 implementation-plan-level-3 Master Plan Level 3 – Report https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Year 2020 implementation-report-level-3 European ATM Portal https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor National AIP https://avinor.no/en/ais/aipnorway/ FAB Performance Plan https://www.nefab.eu/docs# LSSIP Year 2020 Norway Released Issue APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2020 document and the signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect the commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 (Implementation View) – Edition 2020. Stakeholder / Name Position Signature and date Organisation -
RNAV Instrument Approach Procedures (IAP's) and the New Charting Format
Effective: Until Further Notice Area Navigation Systems Area Navigation (RNAV)/Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) Instrument Approach Procedures (IAP’s) and the New Charting Format. [REVISED 1/5/00] PURPOSE. Instrument procedures in the first half of the 21st century will be based on satellite navigation, also known as Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). Within the United States, the Global Positioning System (GPS), the Wide Area Augmentation system (WAAS), and the Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS) will comprise the primary components of the GNSS. Air navigation is increasingly dependent upon RNAV systems - as exemplified by Flight Management System (FMS) and Global Positioning System (GPS) avionics. These systems navigate with reference to geographic positions called “waypoints” (WP) specified in latitude/longitude rather than to/from a specific ground-based navigation aid. Reliance on RNAV systems for approach and departure operations will increase as new systems such as WAAS are developed and deployed. To foster and support full and optimal integration of RNAV into the National Airspace System (NAS), the FAA has developed a new procedure type for RNAV IAP’s. This Notice serves to inform the flying public of the new concepts being implemented with the RNAV IAP’s. OPERATIONS. In order to avoid unnecessary duplication and proliferation of instrument approach charts, Jeppesen will publish approach minimums for unaugmented GPS and WAAS (when operational) on the same chart. In addition, approach minimums will be established and published for LNAV/ VNAV - a new type of RNAV instrument approach with lateral and vertical navigation. The approach chart will be titled "RNAV RWY XX." The chart may contain as many as four columns of approach minimums: GLS; LNAV/VNAV; LNAV; and CIRCLING. -
Flight Inspection History Written by Scott Thompson - Sacramento Flight Inspection Office (May 2008)
Flight Inspection History Written by Scott Thompson - Sacramento Flight Inspection Office (May 2008) Through the brief but brilliant span of aviation history, the United States has been at the leading edge of advancing technology, from airframe and engines to navigation aids and avionics. One key component of American aviation progress has always been the airway and navigation system that today makes all-weather transcontinental flight unremarkable and routine. From the initial, tentative efforts aimed at supporting the infant air mail service of the early 1920s and the establishment of the airline industry in the 1930s and 1940s, air navigation later guided aviation into the jet age and now looks to satellite technology for direction. Today, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) provides, as one of many services, the management and maintenance of the American airway system. A little-seen but still important element of that maintenance process is airborne flight inspection. Flight inspection has long been a vital part of providing a safe air transportation system. The concept is almost as old as the airways themselves. The first flight inspectors flew war surplus open-cockpit biplanes, bouncing around with airmail pilots and watching over a steadily growing airway system predicated on airway light beacons to provide navigational guidance. The advent of radio navigation brought an increased importance to the flight inspector, as his was the only platform that could evaluate the radio transmitters from where they were used: in the air. With the development of the Instrument Landing System (ILS) and the Very High Frequency Omni-directional Range (VOR), flight inspection became an essential element to verify the accuracy of the system. -
TCAS II) by Personnel Involved in the Implementation and Operation of TCAS II
Preface This booklet provides the background for a better understanding of the Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS II) by personnel involved in the implementation and operation of TCAS II. This booklet is an update of the TCAS II Version 7.0 manual published in 2000 by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). It describes changes to the CAS logic introduced by Version 7.1 and updates the information on requirements for use of TCAS II and operational experience. Version 7.1 logic changes will improve TCAS Resolution Advisory (RA) sense reversal logic in vertical chase situations. In addition all “Adjust Vertical Speed, Adjust” RAs are converted to “Level-Off, Level-Off” RAs to make it more clear that a reduction in vertical rate is required. The Minimum Operational Performance Standards (MOPS) for TCAS II Version 7.1 were approved in June 2008 and Version 7.1 units are expected to be operating by 2010-2011. Version 6.04a and 7.0 units are also expected to continue operating for the foreseeable future where authorized. 2 Preface................................................................................................................................. 2 The TCAS Solution............................................................................................................. 5 Early Collision Avoidance Systems................................................................................ 5 TCAS II Development .................................................................................................... 6 Initial -
Wisconsin Navigational Aids System Plan, 2000
-op" is \ WISCONSIN 00/ H NAVIGATIONAL AIDS SYSTEM PLAN: 2000 I; a ! ii! Mil .1 ! 3 I NOVEMBER 1990 WlSCONSlN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATlON The preparation of this document was financed in part through a grant from the Federal Aviation Administration under the Air port lmprovement Program as provided in the Airport and Air ways lmprovement Act of 1981 , as amended. Author: Steven R. Coons, WisDOT Division of Planning and Budget Production Editors: Barbara K. Roe, WisDOT Office of Public Affairs James G. Kraft, WisDOT Graphics - Audio/Visual Technical Committee: Tomas Thomas.WisDOT Bureau of Aeronautics Daniel Finkelmeyer, WisDOT Bureau of Aeronautics Mark Pfundheller, WisDOT Bureau of Aeronautics Keith Richardson, WisDOT Bureau of Aeronautics Douglas Dalton, Bureau of System Planning Franco Marcos, Bureau of System Planning WISCONSIN NAVIGATIONAL AIDS SYSTEM PLAN: 2000 WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NOVEMBER 1990 Table of Contents Page Executive Summary l Introduction 1 Section 1 - Technology Evaluation 3 Navigational Aids 3 Visual Landing Aids 5 The Future of Aeronautical Navigational Aids 7 Section 2 - Existing System of Navigational and Visual Landing Aids in Wisconsin 12 Section 3 - Planning Criteria and Recommendations 30 Planning Criteria 30 Recommendations 32 Section 4 - Financing and Prioritizing Recommended lmprovements 48 Recommended NAVAlD lmprovement Costs and Funding Sources 48 Appendix A - List of Acronyms 55 Appendix B - The Wisconsin AWOS System Plan: Benefits, Criteria and Prioritizations 56 Appendix C - Selected References 61 Executive Summary Benefits of Aviation Airports, aviation and industries associated with aviation have a profound effect on the economic health and development of communities throughout the state. Aviation enhances the quality of life in Wisconsin by providing access to all parts of the world. -
Performance Improvement Methods for Terrain Database Integrity
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT METHODS FOR TERRAIN DATABASE INTEGRITY MONITORS AND TERRAIN REFERENCED NAVIGATION A thesis presented to the Faculty of the Fritz J. and Dolores H. Russ College of Engineering and Technology of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science Ananth Kalyan Vadlamani March 2004 This thesis entitled PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT METHODS FOR TERRAIN DATABASE INTEGRITY MONITORS AND TERRAIN REFERENCED NAVIGATION BY ANANTH KALYAN VADLAMANI has been approved for the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and the Russ College of Engineering and Technology by Maarten Uijt de Haag Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science R. Dennis Irwin Dean, Russ College of Engineering and Technology VADLAMANI, ANANTH K. M.S. March 2004. Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Performance Improvement Methods for Terrain Database Integrity Monitors and Terrain Referenced Navigation (115pp.) Director of Thesis: Maarten Uijt de Haag Terrain database integrity monitors and terrain-referenced navigation systems are based on performing a comparison between stored terrain elevations with data from airborne sensors like radar altimeters, inertial measurement units, GPS receivers etc. This thesis introduces the concept of a spatial terrain database integrity monitor and discusses methods to improve its performance. Furthermore, this thesis discusses an improvement of the terrain-referenced aircraft position estimation for aircraft navigation using only the information from downward-looking sensors and terrain databases, and not the information from the inertial measurement unit. Vertical and horizontal failures of the terrain database are characterized. Time and frequency domain techniques such as the Kalman filter, the autocorrelation function and spectral estimation are designed to evaluate the performance of the proposed integrity monitor and position estimator performance using flight test data from Eagle/Vail, CO, Juneau, AK, Asheville, NC and Albany, OH. -
Instrument Rating ‒ Airplane Airman Certification Standards
FAA-S-ACS-8B (with Change 1) U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Instrument Rating ‒ Airplane Airman Certification Standards June 2018 Flight Standards Service Washington, DC 20591 Acknowledgments The U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Office of Safety Standards, Regulatory Support Division, Airman Testing Branch, P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125 developed this Airman Certification Standards (ACS) document with the assistance of the aviation community. The FAA gratefully acknowledges the valuable support from the many individuals and organizations who contributed their time and expertise to assist in this endeavor. Availability This ACS is available for download from www.faa.gov. Please send comments regarding this document using the following link to the Airman Testing Branch Mailbox. Material in FAA-S-ACS-8B will be effective June 11, 2018. All previous editions of the Instrument Rating – Airplane Airman Certification Standards will be obsolete as of this date for airplane applicants. i Foreword The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has published the Instrument Rating – Airplane Airman Certification Standards (ACS) document to communicate the aeronautical knowledge, risk management, and flight proficiency standards for the instrument rating in the airplane category, single-engine land and sea; and multiengine land and sea classes. This ACS incorporates and supersedes FAA-S-ACS-8A Instrument Rating – Airplane Airman Certification Standards. The FAA views the ACS as the foundation of its transition to a more integrated and systematic approach to airman certification. The ACS is part of the Safety Management System (SMS) framework that the FAA uses to mitigate risks associated with airman certification training and testing. -
AEN-88: the Global Positioning System
AEN-88 The Global Positioning System Tim Stombaugh, Doug McLaren, and Ben Koostra Introduction cies. The civilian access (C/A) code is transmitted on L1 and is The Global Positioning System (GPS) is quickly becoming freely available to any user. The precise (P) code is transmitted part of the fabric of everyday life. Beyond recreational activities on L1 and L2. This code is scrambled and can be used only by such as boating and backpacking, GPS receivers are becoming a the U.S. military and other authorized users. very important tool to such industries as agriculture, transporta- tion, and surveying. Very soon, every cell phone will incorporate Using Triangulation GPS technology to aid fi rst responders in answering emergency To calculate a position, a GPS receiver uses a principle called calls. triangulation. Triangulation is a method for determining a posi- GPS is a satellite-based radio navigation system. Users any- tion based on the distance from other points or objects that have where on the surface of the earth (or in space around the earth) known locations. In the case of GPS, the location of each satellite with a GPS receiver can determine their geographic position is accurately known. A GPS receiver measures its distance from in latitude (north-south), longitude (east-west), and elevation. each satellite in view above the horizon. Latitude and longitude are usually given in units of degrees To illustrate the concept of triangulation, consider one satel- (sometimes delineated to degrees, minutes, and seconds); eleva- lite that is at a precisely known location (Figure 1). If a GPS tion is usually given in distance units above a reference such as receiver can determine its distance from that satellite, it will have mean sea level or the geoid, which is a model of the shape of the narrowed its location to somewhere on a sphere that distance earth. -
FSF ALAR Briefing Note 3.2 -- Altitude Deviations
Flight Safety Foundation Approach-and-landing Accident Reduction Tool Kit FSF ALAR Briefing Note 3.2 — Altitude Deviations Altitude deviations may result in substantial loss of aircraft • The pilot-system interface: vertical separation or horizontal separation, which could cause – Altimeter setting, use of autopilot, monitoring of a midair collision. instruments and displays; or, Maneuvers to avoid other aircraft often result in injuries to • The pilot-controller interface: passengers, flight crewmembers and, particularly, to cabin crewmembers. – Communication loop (i.e., the confirmation/ correction process). Statistical Data Altitude deviations occur usually as the result of one or more of the following conditions: An analysis by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and by USAir (now US Airways) of altitude-deviation events1 • The controller assigns an incorrect altitude or reassigns showed that: a flight level after the pilot was cleared to an altitude; • Approximately 70 percent of altitude deviations were the • Pilot-controller communication breakdown — mainly result of a breakdown in pilot-controller communication; readback/hearback errors such as the following: and, – Controller transmits an incorrect altitude, the pilot • Nearly 40 percent of altitude deviations resulted when does not read back the altitude and the controller does air traffic control (ATC) assigned 10,000 feet and the not challenge the absence of a readback; flight crew set 11,000 feet in the selected-altitude – Pilot reads back an incorrect altitude, but the window, or when ATC assigned 11,000 feet and the flight controller does not hear the erroneous readback and crew set 10,000 feet in the selected-altitude window. does not correct the pilot’s readback; or, Defining Altitude Deviations – Pilot accepts an altitude clearance intended for another aircraft (confusion of call signs); An altitude deviation is a deviation from the assigned altitude • Pilot receives, understands and reads back the correct (or flight level) equal to or greater than 300 feet.