DOCSLIB.ORG

The Rock Garden 138 Garden Rock The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

January 2017 THE ROCK GARDEN 138 THE ROCK GARDEN 1 – 138 XXXV Part Volume Fritillaria imperialis. For copyright reasons, electronic members may only view the original cover image at https://www.royalcollection.org.uk/collection/924280/narcissus- radiiflorus-narcissus-poeticus-crown-imperial-fritillaria January 2017 Postal Subscriptions from 1st October, 2016 Postal subscriptions are payable annually by October and provide membership of the SRGC until 30th September of the following year. Subscription Rates UK Overseas Grrrr & TTTlrlmaaa WTllliia HHlidTyy Single annual £18 £23 Junior £3 £7 (under 18 on 1st Oct) Family £21 £25 (Two adults and up to two children under 18 on 1st Oct) Three year subscriptions are available at three times the above annual rates. Renewals for three year subscriptions may only be made at the end of the three year period. All subscription payments to the club must be made in GB Pounds Sterling. Cheques should be made payable to ‘The Scottish Rock Garden Club’ and must be drawn on a UK bank. Subscription payments may be made through the post by Visa or Mastercard providing the following information is sent: The long number on the card The name of the cardholder as shown on the card The card expiry date The cv2 3 digit number (from back of the card) The cardholder’s signature. Visa, Mastercard and Paypal subscription payments may also be made via the secure order form on the Club’s website at www.srgc.net No card details whatsoever are retained by the Club after the transaction, whether sent by post or through the web site. Applications for postal membership and subscription payments should be sent to: Subscription Secretary 10 Quarry Avenue Acklington Morpeth Northumberland NE65 9BZ United Kingdom Telephone: 07986 849364 Email: [email protected] Electronic subscriptions Electronic subscriptions are available at £10 per year to individuals, valid from the date of payment. Payment may only be made via the web site using Paypal. No printed material is sent for such memberships. All journals and documents are made available for download from www.srgc.net as pdf files. Any seed exchange charges will be payable at the time of ordering via the web site. Further information about this For our brochure, or more information, call our wildlife travel experts form of membership is available only at www.srgc.net (and not from the Subscription Secretary). 01962 733051 www.naturetrek.co.uk Naturetrek, Mingledown Barn, Wolf’s Lane, Chawton, Hampshire GU34 3HJ The Rock Garden The Journal of the Scottish Rock Garden Club January 2017 Number 138 Cover: Crown imperial, narcissi and auriculas; this image appears by special permission of the Royal Collection Trust / © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2016; its reference is RCIN 924280 1 The Art Of The Garden – Vanessa Remington 12 In the Footsteps of John W Blanchard 12 – Matthew Topsfield 130 The SRGC at Gardening Scotland, 2016 – Stan da Prato 134 My Garden 34 – Gert Hoek 142 North-west Turkey in the Spring – David Millward 42 64 A Very Simplified Guide to Plant Naming – Mala Janes 68 50 Years Ago: Rhododendrons for the 70 Small Garden – Phyllis Warren, Richard Green & Mike Thornley 70 Making a Three Metre Trough – Jan Tholhuijsen 74 74 Celebrating 75 Years of the Edinburgh Show – David Millward 92 1 4 Snowdrop Day 1 29 Club News 1 5 Grantown Summer Event 92 Show Reports 1 6 Discussion Weekend 2017 119 Scottish Joint 8 Book Reviews Rock Awards 92 © The Scottish Rock Garden Club, 2017 Printed by Wyke Printers, Hull. www.wyke-printers.co.uk ISSN 0265-5500 www.srgc.net THE ROCK GARDEN is published twice yearly by the Scottish Rock Garden Club on 31st January and 31st July Anton Edwards The Editor welcomes articles, photographs and Duguid’s Wark illustrations on any aspects of alpine and rock Manse Road garden plants and their cultivation. Authors are encouraged to submit material electronically Caputh but articles may also be submitted in Perthshire manuscript. Digital images are particularly PH1 4JH welcome; high quality prints or drawings may 01738 710774 also be submitted. [email protected] The normal deadlines for contributions are 1st November for the January issue and 1st April for the July issue. These dates also apply for material for the Yearbook and Show Schedules. Journals usually arrive in February and August. Please contact the Subscriptions Secretary in case of non-arrival (see inside front cover). Enquiries about advertising should be made to: David Nicholson 7 Carter Road Ivybridge Devon PL21 0RX 01752 896307 [email protected] IndividualUse this QR copies Code are for available our site www.srgc.net from: Glassford Sprunt 17 Claremont Drive Bridge of Allan Stirlingshire FK9Please 4EE use the link to Amazon at the bottom of our web pages so as to earn commission money for the Tel. 01786 833607 (evenings only) SRGC at no cost to yourself. [email protected] Permission to reproduce photographs or articles may be sought from the editor or the author. Photographs are usually by authors unless otherwise stated. Those marked are supported by the Danner bequest. Contact may also be made through the club website: www.srgc.net Alexander Marshal and Issue 138: The Art Of The Garden The Cover Vanessa Remington he work of Alexander Marshal (c. 1620-82) is commemorated in the Royal Collection Trust’s exhibition entitled Painting Paradise: The Art Tof The Garden at The Queen’s Gallery, Palace of Holyroodhouse, Edinburgh until 26 February 2017. Marshal produced the only surviving example of a seventeenth-century English flower-book (or ‘florilegium’). His great work, painstakingly completed over at least three decades, amounts to a personal archive, for Marshal was not a professional artist but a well-connected gentleman-amateur with a passionate interest in plants. In 1653, Marshal was offered and refused 300 pieces of gold for his flower- book, which became his lifetime’s work. He left as his legacy an exquisite visual record of the plants in cultivation in some of the most important and exciting gardens of his generation. Marshal maintained two gardens of his own, one in Islington, North London, and the other in Northamptonshire, For copyright reasons, possibly at Castle Ashby, electronic members may only view this image the seat of James Compton, at 3rd Earl of Northampton https://www.royalcollection.org.uk/ (1622-81). But it was collection/924344/spiderwort-tradescantia- from the gardens of his virginiana-l-with-an-unnamed-snail-family- friends John Tradescant helicidae the Younger (1608-62) at Lambeth in London, and Henry Compton, Bishop of London (1631/2-1713) at Fulham Palace, that he must have drawn the richest inspiration for his volume of watercolours. The earliest record of Spiderwort (Tradescantia virginiana), a snail, an unidentified rose called ‘the Ragatte Rose’, Nigella hispanica and Love-in-a-mist, double form). (Royal Collection Trust / © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2016) The Art Of The Garden 1 Marshal shows him living in Lambeth with John Tradescant the Younger in 1641, and he is known to have completed a flower-book for his friend, depicting ‘the choicest Flowers and Plants’ in the South London garden. One of the folios on display in Edinburgh (RCIN 924344) shows one of John Tradescant the Elder’s introductions from Virginia. Spiderwort (Tradescantia virginiana) was grown in England for the first time by the elder Tradescant, although it had been known in Europe since the previous century. Marshal included pink- and purple-flowering specimens, combined in an informal arrangement on the same sheet, with two other new introductions: Spanish Love-in-a-mist (Nigella hispanica), first described at Droxford, near Petersfield, Hampshire in 1621 by the botanist John Goodyear (c. 1592-1664); and a double form of Love-in- a-mist (Nigella damascena ‘Flore Pleno’), which was already growing in English gardens by 1578. Although native species such as the Sweet Briar (Rosa rubiginosa) or Common Milkwort (Polygala vulgaris) appear in Marshal’s flower-book, it is the new varieties beloved by seventeenth-century florists and plant- hunters that dominate his work. Among its pages are included 60 tulips, 60 carnations and 38 auriculas, reflecting the particular fascination that these exotic new species held for Marshal and his contemporaries. Side- by-side in Edinburgh are two folios which depict highly-prized auriculas. The first folio (RCIN 924280) shows two diminutive examples beneath a towering Crown Imperial (Fritillaria imperialis - see the cover of this issue). The Crown Imperial was introduced to Vienna from Constantinople in 1576 and was named after the imperial gardens where it was first grown. On the second sheet are fourteen stems of the naturally occurring Auricula hybrid. The example in the top left-hand corner shows a rare double- striped flower. The Reverend Samuel Gilbert, writing in The Florist’s Vade Mecum (1682), called two similar double-striped auriculas ‘the two choicest rarities in Flora’s cabinet’. Many of the flowers shown on this sheet have either notched or pointed petals and are thrum-eyed. Only four have pin-eyed tubes. The leaves also vary, with most being either dentate or slightly serrate. Possibly the most remarkable of any of Marshal’s paintings is the unnamed tulip on folio 36 (RCIN 924303) of Marshal’s flower-book. It demonstrates the particular interest of seventeenth-century plantsmen in an attribute of the tulip that was not fully understood at the time but which was ruthlessly pursued by plant connoisseurs – the ‘flamed’ appearance of the petals which took on intricate striped patterns. The phenomenon is caused by a virus spread by aphids, and plants endowed with this feature were valued even more highly than the norm.
Recommended publications
  • Nomenclatura De Narcissus L

    Nomenclatura De Narcissus L

    Nomenclatura de Amaryllidaceae J. St.-Hil. Amaryllidaceae J. St.-Hil., Expos. Fam. Nat. 1: 134 (1805) [nom. cons.], validated by a description in French. Nombres que aparecen en las observaciones Amaryllis belladonna L., Sp. Pl.: 293 (1753), en las observaciones de la fam. Amaryllidaceae iberica Flora 1 Nomenclatura de Galanthus L. Galanthus L., Sp. Pl.: 288 (1753) T.: G. nivalis L. Galanthus nivalis L., Sp. Pl.: 288 (1753) Ind. Loc.- “Habitat as radices Alpium Veronae, Tridenti, Viennae” [lectótipo designado por A.P. Davis in Regnum Veg. 127: 48 (1993): LINN 409.1] {} = Galanthus fontii Sennen, Pl. Espagne 1915, n.º 2851 (1915-1916), in sched., nom. nud. iberica Flora 2 Nomenclatura de Lapiedra Lag. Lapiedra Lag. in Gen. Sp. Pl.: [14] (1816) T.: L. martinezii Lag. Lapiedra martinezii Lag. in Gen. Sp. Pl.: [14] (1816) Ind. Loc.- “Hab. ad saxorum rimas subhumidas, in monte Arcis Saguntinae, prope Sanctuarium de la Fuen Santa juxta Algezares oppidum in Murciae Regno, atque non procul á Malacensi urbe legit acerrimus Naturae scrutator D. Felix Haenseler” [neótipo designado por R. Gonzalo & al. in Candollea 63: 206 (2008): MA 731958] ≡ Crinum martinezii (Lag.) Spreng., Syst. Veg. 2: 56 (1825) Nombres necesarios para el índice Crinum L., Sp. Pl.: 291 (1753) iberica Flora 3 Nomenclatura de Leucojum L. Leucojum L., Sp. Pl.: 289 (1753) LT.: L. vernum L. [cf. Hitchock, Prop. Brit. Bot. 144 (1929)] Leucojum aestivum L., Syst. Nat. ed. 10: 975 (1759) Ind. Loc.- “Habitat in Pannonia, Hetruria, Monspelii” [sec. L., Sp. Pl. ed. 2: 414 (1762)] ≡ Leucojum aestivum subsp. aestivum L., Syst. Nat. ed.
  • New Plantings in the Arboretum the YEAR in REVIEW

    New Plantings in the Arboretum the YEAR in REVIEW

    Four new have been Four new Yoshino cherry trees have Yoshinobeen planted along planted Azalea Way. cherry trees along Azalea New Plantings in the Arboretum THE YEAR IN REVIEW T EX T B Y R AY L A R SON P HO T OS B Y N IA ll D UNNE n the five years that I have been curator, 2018 was the most active in terms of new plantings in the Arboretum. A majority of these centered around the new Arboretum Loop Trail and adjacent areas, many of which were enhanced, rehabilitated and Iaugmented. We also made improvements to a few other collection and garden areas with individual and smaller plantings. Following is a summary of some of the more noticeable new plantings you might encounter during your next visit. Winter 2019 v 3 Arboretum Entrance Perhaps the most obvious major planting occurred in March, just north of the Graham Visitors Center, with the creation of a new, large bed at the southeast corner of the intersection of Arboretum Drive and Foster Island Road. This intersection changed a lot as part of the Loop Trail construction—with the addition of new curbs and crosswalks—and we wanted to create a fitting entrance to the Arboretum at its north end. The new planting was also intended to alleviate some of the soil compaction and social trails that had developed on the east side of Arboretum Drive during trail construction. What’s more, we wanted to encourage pedes- trians to use the new gravel trail on the west side of the Drive to connect from the lower parking lots to the Visitors Center—rather than walk in the road.
  • NATIVE PLANT FIELD GUIDE Revised March 2012

    NATIVE PLANT FIELD GUIDE Revised March 2012

    NATIVE PLANT FIELD GUIDE Revised March 2012 Hansen's Northwest Native Plant Database www.nwplants.com Foreword Once upon a time, there was a very kind older gentleman who loved native plants. He lived in the Pacific northwest, so plants from this area were his focus. As a young lad, his grandfather showed him flowers and bushes and trees, the sweet taste of huckleberries and strawberries, the smell of Giant Sequoias, Incense Cedars, Junipers, pines and fir trees. He saw hummingbirds poking Honeysuckles and Columbines. He wandered the woods and discovered trillium. When he grew up, he still loved native plants--they were his passion. He built a garden of natives and then built a nursery so he could grow lots of plants and teach gardeners about them. He knew that alien plants and hybrids did not usually live peacefully with natives. In fact, most of them are fierce enemies, not well behaved, indeed, they crowd out and overtake natives. He wanted to share his information so he built a website. It had a front page, a page of plants on sale, and a page on how to plant natives. But he wanted more, lots more. So he asked for help. I volunteered and he began describing what he wanted his website to do, what it should look like, what it should say. He shared with me his dream of making his website so full of information, so inspiring, so educational that it would be the most important source of native plant lore on the internet, serving the entire world.
  • Planting Schemes Advice Note 2021

    Planting Schemes Advice Note 2021

    Natural Environment Team East Dorset Environment Partnership Dorset Biodiversity Appraisal Protocol Advice Note Planting scheme recommendations Introduction This advice note was written with the East Dorset Environment Partnership and is intended primarily to assist ecological consultants and developers when submitting Biodiversity Plans (BPs) and Landscape & Ecological Management Plans (LEMPs) to DC NET for review under the Dorset Biodiversity Appraisal Protocol (DBAP) by describing how to maximise the biodiversity potential of good planting schemes designed to deliver multiple benefits and contribute to achieving biodiversity net gain. Making the most of existing habitats strengthened through strong eco-tones; sound planting composition; connectivity to ecological networks within and beyond site boundaries and appropriate on-going management are all fundamental elements of an outstanding planting scheme. Submitted planting schemes for developments should seek to offer biodiversity benefit and comply with Dorset Council’s Pollinators Action Plan and Green Infrastructure Strategies. Schemes should demonstrate how they will contribute to addressing the Climate & Ecological Emergency Strategy (Draft 2020). Currently, many schemes appear to be generic designs that do not take account of local conditions and are based on widely available and low-cost shrubs; many of which are invasive, potentially invasive or nuisance plants known as ‘garden thugs’. This is of particular concern where new sites for development are on the rural fringe and pose a significant risk of spreading damaging alien plant species into the wider countryside and sensitive semi-natural habitats. Recent published work by the Royal Horticultural Society (RHS) and others has focussed on lists of plants that attract pollinators rather than broader biodiversity considerations.
  • Conserving Europe's Threatened Plants

    Conserving Europe's Threatened Plants

    Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation By Suzanne Sharrock and Meirion Jones May 2009 Recommended citation: Sharrock, S. and Jones, M., 2009. Conserving Europe’s threatened plants: Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Richmond, UK ISBN 978-1-905164-30-1 Published by Botanic Gardens Conservation International Descanso House, 199 Kew Road, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3BW, UK Design: John Morgan, [email protected] Acknowledgements The work of establishing a consolidated list of threatened Photo credits European plants was first initiated by Hugh Synge who developed the original database on which this report is based. All images are credited to BGCI with the exceptions of: We are most grateful to Hugh for providing this database to page 5, Nikos Krigas; page 8. Christophe Libert; page 10, BGCI and advising on further development of the list. The Pawel Kos; page 12 (upper), Nikos Krigas; page 14: James exacting task of inputting data from national Red Lists was Hitchmough; page 16 (lower), Jože Bavcon; page 17 (upper), carried out by Chris Cockel and without his dedicated work, the Nkos Krigas; page 20 (upper), Anca Sarbu; page 21, Nikos list would not have been completed. Thank you for your efforts Krigas; page 22 (upper) Simon Williams; page 22 (lower), RBG Chris. We are grateful to all the members of the European Kew; page 23 (upper), Jo Packet; page 23 (lower), Sandrine Botanic Gardens Consortium and other colleagues from Europe Godefroid; page 24 (upper) Jože Bavcon; page 24 (lower), Frank who provided essential advice, guidance and supplementary Scumacher; page 25 (upper) Michael Burkart; page 25, (lower) information on the species included in the database.
  • Index Seminum Et Sporarum Quae Hortus Botanicus Universitatis Biarmiensis Pro Mutua Commutatione Offert

    Index Seminum Et Sporarum Quae Hortus Botanicus Universitatis Biarmiensis Pro Mutua Commutatione Offert

    INDEX SEMINUM ET SPORARUM QUAE HORTUS BOTANICUS UNIVERSITATIS BIARMIENSIS PRO MUTUA COMMUTATIONE OFFERT Salix recurvigemmata A.K. Skvortsov f. variegata Schumikh., O.E. Epanch. & I.V. Belyaeva Biarmiae 2020 Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Perm State National Research University», A.G. Genkel Botanical Garden ______________________________________________________________________________________ СПИСОК СЕМЯН И СПОР, ПРЕДЛАГАЕМЫХ ДЛЯ ОБМЕНА БОТАНИЧЕСКИМ САДОМ ИМЕНИ А.Г. ГЕНКЕЛЯ ПЕРМСКОГО ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОГО НАЦИОНАЛЬНОГО ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА Syringa vulgaris L. ‘Красавица Москвы’ Пермь 2020 Index Seminum 2020 2 Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Perm State National Research University», A.G. Genkel Botanical Garden ______________________________________________________________________________________ Дорогие коллеги! Ботанический сад Пермского государственного национального исследовательского университета был создан в 1922 г. по инициативе и под руководством проф. А.Г. Генкеля. Здесь работали известные ученые – ботаники Д.А. Сабинин, В.И. Баранов, Е.А. Павский, внесшие своими исследованиями большой вклад в развитие биологических наук на Урале. В настоящее время Ботанический сад имени А.Г. Генкеля входит в состав регионального Совета ботанических садов Урала и Поволжья, Совет ботанических садов России, имеет статус научного учреждения и особо охраняемой природной территории. Основными научными направлениями работы являются: интродукция и акклиматизация растений,
  • Of Plant Diseases in South Carolina

    Of Plant Diseases in South Carolina

    Plant Common Name Index to INDEX OF PLANT DISEASES IN SOUTH CAROLINA James H. Blake, Ed.D., Meg Williamson, M.S., Kathy Ellingson, M.S. Common Name Family Genus/Species Page Abelia, Glossy CAPRIFOLIACEAE Abelia grandiflora 31 African Bush Daisy ASTERACEAE Euryops chrysanthemoides 19 African Daisy ASTERACEAE Arctotis sp. 16 African Lily AMARYLLIDACEAE Agapanthus sp. 5 African Marigold ASTERACEAE Tagetes erecta 21 African Violet GESNERIACEAE Saintpaulia sp. 56 Alfalfa FABACEAE Medicago sativa 49 Algerian Ivy ARALIACEAE Hedera canariensis 13 Almond ROSACEAE Prunus sp. 100 Aloe LILIACEAE Aloe sp. 64 Aloe Vera LILIACEAE Aloe barbadensis 64 Alternanthera AMARANTHACEAE Alternanthera sp. 5 Althaea MALVACEAE Althaea sp. 70 Alyssum BRASSICACEAE Lobularia sp. 29 Amaryllis AMARYLLIDACEAE Amaryllis sp. 6 American Beech FAGACEAE Fagus grandifolia 52 American Boxwood BUXACEAE Buxus sempervirens 29 American Holly AQUIFOLIACEAE Ilex opaca 10 American Mountain Ash OLEACEAE Sorbus americana 74 Anacyclus ASTERACEAE Anacyclus sp. 16 Anemone, Japanese RANUNCULACEAE Anemone hupehensis 93 Anise Hyssop LAMIACEAE Agastache foeniculum 60 Anise Tree ILLICIACEAE Illicium sp. 58 Annual Bluegrass POACEAE Poa annua 86 Annual Clary Sage LAMIACEAE Salvia viridis 63 Annual Vinca APOCYNACEAE Catharanthus roseus 7 Annual Vinca APOCYNACEAE Catharanthus sp. 7 Anthurium ARACEAE Anthurium sp. 11 Apple ROSACEAE Malus sp. 96 Apple, Common ROSACEAE Malus sylvestris pumila 96 Apricot ROSACEAE Prunus armeniaca 98 Aralia ARALIACEAE Aralia sp. 12 Aralia Ivy ARALIACEAE x Fatshedera sp. 12 Aralia, Ming ARALIACEAE Polyscias fruticosa 14 Arborvitae CUPRESSACEAE Thuja occidentalis 41 Arborvitae sp. CUPRESSACEAE Thuja sp. 41 Armandii Clematis RANUNCULACEAE Clematis armandii 93 Aromi Azalea EBENACEAE Rhododendron x aromi 44 Aromi Azalea EBENACEAE Rhododendron x aromi 44 Artemisia ASTERACEAE Artemisia schmidtiana 16 Artichoke ASTERACEAE Cynara scolymus 15 Arugula BRASSICACEAE Arugula sp.
  • New Crop Report Dianthus Repens

    New Crop Report Dianthus Repens

    New Crop Report Dianthus repens Alissa Matara Taxonomy . Scientific name: Dianthus repens . Family: Caryophyllaceae . Synonyms: None . Common names: Northern Pink, Boreal Carnation Geographic Distribution . Continents: Asia, Europe, North America . Countries: Siberia, Soviet Far East, China, East Europe (Russia), Canada (Yukon Territory), United States (Alaska) . Latitudinal Ranges: 70°-60° N . Altitude: 10-1400 m . Tendency to naturalize or become invasive: Unknown North American Geographic Distribution General Climatic Conditions . An arctic-alpine species which occupies cold, steppe habitats in temperate regions Native Habitat . Grow in rock outcrops, meadows at the forest edge, mountain slopes, riverbanks and steppes. Taxonomic Description . Growth Habit: Forb/Herb . Root System: Fibrous . Leaves: sheath 1-2mm, 1-2 times as long as stem diameter, blade lance-linear to oblong or linear, 1-4.5 cm, green, margins glabrous . Flower: calx, 10-14 mm; glabrous, lobes triangular, 2-4 mm; petals pink to pink-purple Taxonomic Description . Season of Bloom: Mid- Summer . Uses: Used by local Chinese for medicinal purposes, ornamental Varieties/Cultivars on the Market . Dianthus has been referenced back to the 16th century . Dianthus alpinus . Introduced in 1759 . From the Austrian Alps . Has been bred for numerous varieties . ‘Joan’s Blood’ . Dianthus barbatus . Original Sweet William . One of the oldest species grown in Britain, 1573 . From lower mountain meadows in Europe . ‘Heart Attack’ . Dianthus chinensis . From the hills and Mountains of East Asia . Introduced to Britain over 300 yrs. Ago and brought to America with the colonists . ‘Raspberry Parfait’ . Dianthus deltoides . Inhabits Europe and Asia . Free-Flowering . ‘Brilliancy’ Propagation . Seed Primarily . Seed Dormancy: None . Germination Temps/Duration: 1-3 month germination as seed is wild and germinates un-uniformly at 16-18° C.
  • Plant Genus/Species Name Index to INDEX of PLANT DISEASES IN

    Plant Genus/Species Name Index to INDEX of PLANT DISEASES IN

    Plant Genus/Species Name Index to INDEX OF PLANT DISEASES IN SOUTH CAROLINA James H. Blake, Ed.D., Meg Williamson, M.S., Kathy Ellingson, M.S. Genus/Species Common Name Family Page Abelia grandiflora Abelia, Glossy CAPRIFOLIACEAE 31 Abelia grandiflora Glossy Abelia CAPRIFOLIACEAE 31 Abelmoschus esculentus Okra MALVACEAE 69 Abies sp. Fir PINACEAE 77 Abutilon sp. Flowering Maple MALVACEAE 69 Acer japonicum Japanese Maple (Japonicum) ACERACEAE 2 Acer japonicum Maple, Japanese ACERACEAE 2 Acer negundo Box Elder ACERACEAE 2 Acer negundo Elder, Box ACERACEAE 2 Acer palmatum Japanese Maple (Palmatum) ACERACEAE 2 Acer palmatum Maple, Cutleaf Japanese ACERACEAE 2 Acer palmatum Maple, Japanese ACERACEAE 2 Acer palmatum ‘Sango-kaku’ Maple, "Sango-kaku" Coral Bark ACERACEAE 2 Acer palmatum ‘Sango-kaku’ Sango-kaku Maple, Coral Bark ACERACEAE 2 Acer platanoides Maple, Norway ACERACEAE 2 Acer platanoides Norway Maple ACERACEAE 2 Acer pseudoplatanus Maple, Sycamore ACERACEAE 2 Acer pseudoplatanus Sycamore Maple ACERACEAE 2 Acer rubrum Maple, Red ACERACEAE 3 Acer rubrum Red Maple ACERACEAE 3 Acer saccharinum Maple, Silver ACERACEAE 3 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple ACERACEAE 3 Acer saccharum Maple, Sugar ACERACEAE 3 Acer saccharum Sugar Maple ACERACEAE 3 Acer saccharum subsp. Nigrum Black Maple ACERACEAE 3 Acer saccharum subsp. Nigrum Maple, Black ACERACEAE 3 Acer sp. Maple ACERACEAE 3 Acer x freemanii Freeman’s Maple ACERACEAE 3 Acer x freemanii Maple, Freeman’s ACERACEAE 3 Achillea sp. Yarrow ASTERACEAE 15 Achimenes sp. Japanese Pansy GESNERIACEAE 56 Aconitum sp. Monkshood RANUNCULACEAE 93 Acorus gramineus Grassy-leaved Sweet Flag ARACEAE 11 Acorus sp. Sweet Flag ARACEAE 11 Actinidia chinensis Kiwi ACTINIDIACEAE 4 Adenium sp.
  • South American Cacti in Time and Space: Studies on the Diversification of the Tribe Cereeae, with Particular Focus on Subtribe Trichocereinae (Cactaceae)

    South American Cacti in Time and Space: Studies on the Diversification of the Tribe Cereeae, with Particular Focus on Subtribe Trichocereinae (Cactaceae)

    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2013 South American Cacti in time and space: studies on the diversification of the tribe Cereeae, with particular focus on subtribe Trichocereinae (Cactaceae) Lendel, Anita Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-93287 Dissertation Published Version Originally published at: Lendel, Anita. South American Cacti in time and space: studies on the diversification of the tribe Cereeae, with particular focus on subtribe Trichocereinae (Cactaceae). 2013, University of Zurich, Faculty of Science. South American Cacti in Time and Space: Studies on the Diversification of the Tribe Cereeae, with Particular Focus on Subtribe Trichocereinae (Cactaceae) _________________________________________________________________________________ Dissertation zur Erlangung der naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorwürde (Dr.sc.nat.) vorgelegt der Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Zürich von Anita Lendel aus Kroatien Promotionskomitee: Prof. Dr. H. Peter Linder (Vorsitz) PD. Dr. Reto Nyffeler Prof. Dr. Elena Conti Zürich, 2013 Table of Contents Acknowledgments 1 Introduction 3 Chapter 1. Phylogenetics and taxonomy of the tribe Cereeae s.l., with particular focus 15 on the subtribe Trichocereinae (Cactaceae – Cactoideae) Chapter 2. Floral evolution in the South American tribe Cereeae s.l. (Cactaceae: 53 Cactoideae): Pollination syndromes in a comparative phylogenetic context Chapter 3. Contemporaneous and recent radiations of the world’s major succulent 86 plant lineages Chapter 4. Tackling the molecular dating paradox: underestimated pitfalls and best 121 strategies when fossils are scarce Outlook and Future Research 207 Curriculum Vitae 209 Summary 211 Zusammenfassung 213 Acknowledgments I really believe that no one can go through the process of doing a PhD and come out without being changed at a very profound level.
  • Lenka Kočková

    Lenka Kočková

    MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA PŘÍRODOVĚDECKÁ FAKULTA ÚSTAV BOTANIKY A ZOOLOGIE Velikost genomu a poměr bazí v genomu v čeledi Ranunculaceae Diplomová práce Lenka Kočková Vedoucí práce: Doc. RNDr. Petr Bureš, Ph. D. Brno 2012 Bibliografický záznam Autor: Bc. Lenka Kočková Přírodovědecká fakulta, Masarykova univerzita, Ústav botaniky a zoologie Název práce: Velikost genomu a poměr bazí v genomu v čeledi Ranunculaceae Studijní program: Biologie Studijní obor: Systematická biologie a ekologie (Botanika) Vedoucí práce: Doc. RNDr. Petr Bureš, Ph. D. Akademický rok: 2011/2012 Počet stran: 104 Klíčová slova: Ranunculaceae, průtoková cytometrie, PI/DAPI, DNA obsah, velikost genomu, GC obsah, zastoupení bazí, velikost průduchů, Pignattiho indikační hodnoty Bibliographic Entry Author: Bc. Lenka Kočková Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Department of Botany and Zoology Title of Thesis: Genome size and genomic base composition in Ranunculaceae Programme: Biology Field of Study: Systematic Biology and Ecology (Botany) Supervisor: Doc. RNDr. Petr Bureš, Ph. D. Academic Year: 2011/2012 Number of Pages: 104 Keywords: Ranunculaceae, flow cytometry, PI/DAPI, DNA content, genome size, GC content, base composition, stomatal size, Pignatti‘s indicator values Abstrakt Pomocí průtokové cytometrie byla změřena velikost genomu a AT/GC genomový poměr u 135 druhů z čeledi Ranunculaceae. U druhů byla naměřena délka a šířka průduchů a z literatury byly získány údaje o počtu chromozomů a ekologii druhů. Velikost genomu se v rámci čeledi liší 63-krát. Nejmenší genom byl naměřen u Aquilegia canadensis (2C = 0,75 pg), největší u Ranunculus lingua (2C = 47,93 pg). Mezi dvěma hlavními podčeleděmi Ranunculoideae a Thalictroideae je ve velikosti genomu markantní rozdíl (2C = 2,48 – 47,94 pg a 0,75 – 4,04 pg).
  • Special Status Vascular Plant Surveys and Habitat Modeling in Yosemite National Park, 2003–2004

    Special Status Vascular Plant Surveys and Habitat Modeling in Yosemite National Park, 2003–2004

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Special Status Vascular Plant Surveys and Habitat Modeling in Yosemite National Park, 2003–2004 Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SIEN/NRTR—2010/389 ON THE COVER USGS and NPS joint survey for Tompkins’ sedge (Carex tompkinsii), south side Merced River, El Portal, Mariposa County, California (upper left); Yosemite onion (Allium yosemitense) (upper right); Yosemite lewisia (Lewisia disepala) (lower left); habitat model for mountain lady’s slipper (Cypripedium montanum) in Yosemite National Park, California (lower right). Photographs by: Peggy E. Moore. Special Status Vascular Plant Surveys and Habitat Modeling in Yosemite National Park, 2003–2004 Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SIEN/NRTR—2010/389 Peggy E. Moore, Alison E. L. Colwell, and Charlotte L. Coulter U.S. Geological Survey Western Ecological Research Center 5083 Foresta Road El Portal, California 95318 October 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations.