DOCSLIB.ORG

The Female Anuran Reproductive System in Relation to Reproductive Mode''

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

I I THE FEIV1ALE ANURAN REPRODUCT I VE SYSTEIVI IN RELATION TO REPRODUCTIVE tvl0DE by PHILIPPA HORTON B.Sc. (Hons) i I i I Department of Zooì ogY ), Uni vers'ity of Adel ai de f I I A thesis submitted to the Unj r:;itY of Adelaide for the degree of uuctor of PhilosoPhY SEPTEMBER 1984 Qza-vq-aateel L- 6 - .16 TABLE OF CONTENTS page I SUI\ßIARY 1V DECLARATION v ACKNOI{LEDGEMENTS I. INTRODUCTION (a) Background and Ains 1 ti) Reproductive diversity in the Anura 7 (ii) Published data on the fenale anuran reProductive sYsten 2 (iii) Ains of this studY 10 I2 (b) Anuran ReProductive Modes II. TIATERIALS, METHODS AND TERMINOLOGY 23 (a) Specirnens (b) Size of SPecimens 23 2S (c) Eggs (d) Size of Eggs 2S 26 (e) Nunber of Eggs (f) Volume of Eggs Per OvarY 27 (g) Oviducts, and Oviduct Length and Convolutions 27 (h) Oviduct Width 28 29 (i) Ovisacs (j) Disposition of Ovisacs: Histologícal Procedures 30 (k) Ontogenetic Material 30 (1) Processing of Ontogenetic Material 31 (n) Urinary Ducts 37 (n) Statistical AnalYses 32 page III. RESULTS (a) Reproductive Modes 33 (b) Snout-vent Length 33 (c) Eggs 37 (i) Egg diameter 37 - Comparison of egg dianeters bettr'een modes 37 - Conelation of egg dianeter with SVL 4I (ii) Ovarian conPlement 4l - Cornparison of ovarian complements between rnodes 41 - Correlation of ovarian complenent with SVL 42 - Correlation of ovarian complement with egg di arneter 42 (iii) ComPlement volume 43 (iv) Egg Pignentation 43 (v) Egg jellY caPsules 43 (d) 0varies 4S (i) The anuran ovary, general description 45 (ii) Number of lobes of the ovary 45 - Intraspecific variability in lobe number 46 - Comparison of lobe nurnbers between modes 46 - Correlation of lobe numbers with SVL 50 - Correlation of lobe nunbers with egg dianeter 50 (iii) Differentiation of gonads 51 (iv) Ovarian asYnrnetry 52 (e) 0viducts 55 (i) The anuran oviduct, general description 55 (ii) Convolutions of the paz's conuoLuta 56 - Correlation between number of convolutions and oviduct length 56 - Intraspecific variation in nunbers of convolutions 57 - Conparison of numbers of convolutions between modes 59 - Correlation of nunbers of convolutions with SVL 63 - Correlation of numbers of convolutions with egg diameter 63 page (iii) Ontogeny of the Pars conùoLuta 63 (iv) Diarneter of the pars coru)oLuta jn transverse section 64 - Intraspecific variation in oviduct width 64 - Comparison of oviduct widths between rnodes 65 - Correlation of oviduct width with SVL 65 - Correlation of oviduct width wíth egg dia¡neter 65 - Correlation of oviduct width with numbers of convo 1ut i ons 66 (v) The pars conuoluta in foan-nesting species 66 (vi) Fusion of the ovisacs 67 - Correlation with reproductive rnode 68 - Ovisac fusion in an ontogenetic series of Pseudophnyne bibroni 68 (vii) Occlusion of the ovisacs 73 (viii) The urinogenital sinus 74 IV. DISCUSSION (a) Snout-vent Length 78 79 (b) Eggs (i) Egg dianeter 79 (ii) Ovarian cornPlement 80 (iii) Egg Pignentation 83 (iv) Egg je1lY caPsules 84 (c) Ovaries 85 ii) Morphological variation in vertebrate ovaries 85 (ii) Lobing of anuran ovaries 86 (iii) Ovarian asYmnetry 90 (d) Oviducts 92 (i) Oviducal nodifications 92 (ii) Convolutions of the oviduct 94 (iii) oviduct width 98 (iv) The oviduct in foam-nesting species 100 (v) The ovisac 103 (1) Degree of fusion 103 (2) Occlusion frorn the cloaca 107 page (3) Disposition of the ovisacs and urinary ducts 108 (4) The urinogenital sinus 110 (e)SystematiclmplicationsofReproductiveMorphology It2 (f) predictive and comparative value of Reproductive Morphol ogY 174 APPENDICES Appendix I - specimens Examined in the course of This StudY 118 Appendix II - Precocious Reproduction in the Australian Frog Línmodynaste s tasmaniensi s 127 Appendix III - Reproductive systen. ch.7 in "The Gastric Brooding Frogrr 728 Appendix IV - The Fema1e Reproductive Systen of the Australian Gastric Brooding Frog Rheobatrachus siLus (Anura: Leptodactylidae) t29 130 BIBLIOGRAPHY 1 SUMMARY A¡urans display considerable morphological diversity in the female reprocluctive system, and a great variety of reproductive rnodes ' In this study I defined the relationships between interspecific norphological 'r¡ariation and reproductive modes anong L08 species' Associations between reproductive rnode and morphology must be related to the natule of the spawn, therefore I constructed a classifi- cation of rnodes based on egg dianeter and the degree of embryonic dependence on stored yolk, to facilitate conparison with rnorphology: l,lode I - eggs with little yolk' larvae aquatic and feeding I'lode II - eggs containing moderate yotk TeseIVe, only late 1arva1 stages feeding Mode III - eggs containing large yolk reserve which nourishes embryo or larva throughout development lrlode IV - viviparity (not considered here, because the eggs contain little yolk, therefore reproductive morphology is not influenced by the same pararneters as in sPecies of Modes I - III) ' In defining egg characteristics for each mode, r observed the following features: 1) unpignented eggs in species which oviposit away frorn sunlight, and a significant trend towards loss of pigrnentation frorn I'lode I to III; 1l length in 2) egg diameter (a) is positively correlated with snout-vent speciesoflrlodesllandlllbutnotl,and(b)incrcasessignifi- cantly from Mode I to III; 3) ovarian complement (a) is positively coI.related with snout-rrent length within a mode, and (b) decreases significantly fron lt{ode I to III; 4) a negative correlation between egg diarneter and ovarian complement; 5) for a given snout-vent length, ovarian complement volume remains sinilar regardless of rnode' I investigated the nature of morphological variation and the ontogeny of the reproductive systern. Those features which exhibited significant interspecific variation, together with correlations with reproductive mode, were as follows: 1) the nurnber of ovarian Lobes is positivel'y correlated with snout-vent length and decreases from Mode I to III. These correlations reflect changes in surface area of ovarian epithelium (larger in larger species, srnaller for a smaller number of larger eggs)' which is achieved by changes in the number of lobes; 2) ovarian as)4runetry, which occurs in Rheobatrachus siLus, was not observed in other species, and therefore appears to be unrelated to reproductive mode as defined here; 3) the nurnber of convolutions of the pæs conÐoLuta of the oviduct is proportional to the length of that region, and is positively correlated with snout-vent length in lrlodes I and III but not in Mode Il.ItiSnegativelycorrelatedwitheggdiameter,andsignifi- cantly smaller in Modes II and III than in I'lode I. These correla- tions probably reflect changes in surface aTea of secretory oviduct wal1, achieved by altering oviduct length, in species with different 111 egg diameters and/or ovalian complelnents, which therefore rcquire different quantities of oviduct secretions; 4) oviduct width (an indicator of hmen diameter) is positively correlatedwitheggdiarneter,andissignificantlylargerin eggs of lr{odes II and III than in l.{ode I, thus enabling the large N{odes II and III specì-es to traverse the oviduct; 5) in foam-nesting species the posterior-rnost convolutions aÏe greatlyenlargedandthereforeprobablySecretemucusforfoan production; 6) the ovisacs remain separate, or unite posteriorly' or are com- pletelyunited.SeparateovisacsaÏepresentonlyinspecieswith srnall eggs, and there is a significant trend towards fusion from Mode I to III; fusion rnay reduce the risk of large eggs inpacting during oviPosition. Thereisnoapparentcorre].ationofanypatternofreproductive rnodifications norphology with taxonomic status. sinilar rnorphological have evolved in unrelated species which share the same reproductive environmental mode, presumably in response to srrnilar physiological and pressures. ].v. DECLARATION award of any This thesis contains no rnaterial accepted for the other degree or diplorna in this or any other university' no naterial To the best of ny knowledge this thesis contains previously published or written by another person' except when due reference is nade in the text ' Shouldthisthesisbeacceptedfortheawardofahigherdegree, and loan' I consent to it being nade available for photocopying PHILIPPA HORTON ACKNOl,'lLEDGEMENTS MydeepestglatitudeisextendedtomySupelvisot,l.lichaelJ.Tyler, whowasalwaysreadytoanswerquestions,rekindleenthusiasm,discuss ideasrellcouragepublicationofcornpletedwork'andconstructively criticisedraftsandmanuscripts'Forhisguidance'inspiration' tolerance and hunour I give many thanks' two colleagues Much assistance and guidance was also given by ny MargaretDaviesandTornBurton;theirinterestandcheerfulnessalso added greatly to enjoyment of my research' FortheloanofspecimenslamgratefultoCaliforniaAcadenyof (Miss A'G'C' Sciences (Dr R.C. Drewes), Blitish Museum (Natural History) Grandison),southAustralianl,,Iuseunr(MrM.J.Tyler),l{esternAustralian Museurn(DrG.Storr),andtoKeithMcDonald.Prof.J.D.Lynchvery of ELeutherodactyLus' kindly provided me with specimens of several species TomBurtongenerouslynadeavailablemanyofhismicrohylidspecirnens, Australian naterial and I was fortunate to be able to use much northern co]lectedbyMichaelCappo.MrPaulBennof''MinnanuTra''FishFarm, from property' other Balhannah, gave rne permission to collect frogs his John Reynolds and material was given to me by Jane Moller, Janet Pedler, my thanks' Michael Thompson. To all these people I extend Manyotherpeoplehelpedindiversewayswi.thnyproject,andlwish Chris Mi11er and to express rny gratitude
Recommended publications
  • Return Rates of Male Hylid Frogs Litoria Genimaculata, L. Nannotis, L

    Return Rates of Male Hylid Frogs Litoria Genimaculata, L. Nannotis, L

    Vol. 11: 183–188, 2010 ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH Published online April 16 doi: 10.3354/esr00253 Endang Species Res OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Return rates of male hylid frogs Litoria genimaculata, L. nannotis, L. rheocola and Nyctimystes dayi after toe-tipping Andrea D. Phillott1, 2,*, Keith R. McDonald1, 3, Lee F. Skerratt1, 2 1Amphibian Disease Ecology Group and 2School of Public Health, Tropical Medicine and Rehabilitation Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia 3Threatened Species Branch, Department of Environment and Resource Management, PO Box 975, Atherton, Queensland 4883, Australia ABSTRACT: Toe-tipping is a commonly used procedure for mark-recapture studies of frogs, although it has been criticised for its potential influence on frog behaviour, site fidelity and mortality. We com- pared 24 h return rates of newly toe-tipped frogs to those previously toe-tipped and found no evi- dence of a stress response reflected by avoidance behaviour for 3 species: Litoria genimaculata, L. rheocola and Nyctimystes dayi. L. nannotis was the only studied species to demonstrate a greater reaction to toe-tipping than handling alone; however, return rates (65%) in the 1 to 3 mo after mark- ing were the highest of any species, showing that the reaction did not endure. The comparatively milder short-term response to toe-tipping in N. dayi (24% return rate) may have been caused by the species’ reduced opportunity for breeding. Intermediate-term return rates were relatively high for 2 species, L. nannotis and L. genimaculata, given their natural history, suggesting there were no major adverse effects of toe-tipping. Longer-term adverse effects could not be ruled out for L.
  • Effects of Emerging Infectious Diseases on Amphibians: a Review of Experimental Studies

    Effects of Emerging Infectious Diseases on Amphibians: a Review of Experimental Studies

    diversity Review Effects of Emerging Infectious Diseases on Amphibians: A Review of Experimental Studies Andrew R. Blaustein 1,*, Jenny Urbina 2 ID , Paul W. Snyder 1, Emily Reynolds 2 ID , Trang Dang 1 ID , Jason T. Hoverman 3 ID , Barbara Han 4 ID , Deanna H. Olson 5 ID , Catherine Searle 6 ID and Natalie M. Hambalek 1 1 Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; [email protected] (P.W.S.); [email protected] (T.D.); [email protected] (N.M.H.) 2 Environmental Sciences Graduate Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; [email protected] (J.U.); [email protected] (E.R.) 3 Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; [email protected] 4 Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, New York, NY 12545, USA; [email protected] 5 US Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; [email protected] 6 Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence [email protected]; Tel.: +1-541-737-5356 Received: 25 May 2018; Accepted: 27 July 2018; Published: 4 August 2018 Abstract: Numerous factors are contributing to the loss of biodiversity. These include complex effects of multiple abiotic and biotic stressors that may drive population losses. These losses are especially illustrated by amphibians, whose populations are declining worldwide. The causes of amphibian population declines are multifaceted and context-dependent. One major factor affecting amphibian populations is emerging infectious disease. Several pathogens and their associated diseases are especially significant contributors to amphibian population declines.
  • Freshwater Fishes

    Freshwater Fishes

    WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE state oF BIODIVERSITY 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction 2 Chapter 2 Methods 17 Chapter 3 Freshwater fishes 18 Chapter 4 Amphibians 36 Chapter 5 Reptiles 55 Chapter 6 Mammals 75 Chapter 7 Avifauna 89 Chapter 8 Flora & Vegetation 112 Chapter 9 Land and Protected Areas 139 Chapter 10 Status of River Health 159 Cover page photographs by Andrew Turner (CapeNature), Roger Bills (SAIAB) & Wicus Leeuwner. ISBN 978-0-620-39289-1 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES 2 Western Cape Province State of Biodiversity 2007 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Andrew Turner [email protected] 1 “We live at a historic moment, a time in which the world’s biological diversity is being rapidly destroyed. The present geological period has more species than any other, yet the current rate of extinction of species is greater now than at any time in the past. Ecosystems and communities are being degraded and destroyed, and species are being driven to extinction. The species that persist are losing genetic variation as the number of individuals in populations shrinks, unique populations and subspecies are destroyed, and remaining populations become increasingly isolated from one another. The cause of this loss of biological diversity at all levels is the range of human activity that alters and destroys natural habitats to suit human needs.” (Primack, 2002). CapeNature launched its State of Biodiversity Programme (SoBP) to assess and monitor the state of biodiversity in the Western Cape in 1999. This programme delivered its first report in 2002 and these reports are updated every five years. The current report (2007) reports on the changes to the state of vertebrate biodiversity and land under conservation usage.
  • Fauna of Australia 2A

    Fauna of Australia 2A

    FAUNA of AUSTRALIA 9. FAMILY MICROHYLIDAE Thomas C. Burton 1 9. FAMILY MICROHYLIDAE Pl 1.3. Cophixalus ornatus (Microhylidae): usually found in leaf litter, this tiny frog is endemic to the wet tropics of northern Queensland. [H. Cogger] 2 9. FAMILY MICROHYLIDAE DEFINITION AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION The Microhylidae is a family of firmisternal frogs, which have broad sacral diapophyses, one or more transverse folds on the surface of the roof of the mouth, and a unique slip to the abdominal musculature, the m. rectus abdominis pars anteroflecta (Burton 1980). All but one of the Australian microhylids are small (snout to vent length less than 35 mm), and all have procoelous vertebrae, are toothless and smooth-bodied, with transverse grooves on the tips of their variously expanded digits. The terminal phalanges of fingers and toes of all Australian microhylids are T-shaped or Y-shaped (Pl. 1.3) with transverse grooves. The Microhylidae consists of eight subfamilies, of which two, the Asterophryinae and Genyophryninae, occur in the Australopapuan region. Only the Genyophryninae occurs in Australia, represented by Cophixalus (11 species) and Sphenophryne (five species). Two newly discovered species of Cophixalus await description (Tyler 1989a). As both genera are also represented in New Guinea, information available from New Guinean species is included in this chapter to remedy deficiencies in knowledge of the Australian fauna. HISTORY OF DISCOVERY The Australian microhylids generally are small, cryptic and tropical, and so it was not until 100 years after European settlement that the first species, Cophixalus ornatus, was collected, in 1888 (Fry 1912). As the microhylids are much more prominent and diverse in New Guinea than in Australia, Australian specimens have been referred to New Guinean species from the time of the early descriptions by Fry (1915), whilst revisions by Parker (1934) and Loveridge (1935) minimised the extent of endemism in Australia.
  • (Pyxicephalidae: Nothophryne) for Northern Mozambique Inselbergs

    (Pyxicephalidae: Nothophryne) for Northern Mozambique Inselbergs

    African Journal of Herpetology ISSN: 2156-4574 (Print) 2153-3660 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ther20 New species of Mongrel Frogs (Pyxicephalidae: Nothophryne) for northern Mozambique inselbergs Werner Conradie, Gabriela B. Bittencourt-Silva, Harith M. Farooq, Simon P. Loader, Michele Menegon & Krystal A. Tolley To cite this article: Werner Conradie, Gabriela B. Bittencourt-Silva, Harith M. Farooq, Simon P. Loader, Michele Menegon & Krystal A. Tolley (2018): New species of Mongrel Frogs (Pyxicephalidae: Nothophryne) for northern Mozambique inselbergs, African Journal of Herpetology, DOI: 10.1080/21564574.2017.1376714 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/21564574.2017.1376714 View supplementary material Published online: 22 Feb 2018. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ther20 AFRICAN JOURNAL OF HERPETOLOGY, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1080/21564574.2017.1376714 New species of Mongrel Frogs (Pyxicephalidae: Nothophryne) for northern Mozambique inselbergs Werner Conradie a,b, Gabriela B. Bittencourt-Silva c, Harith M. Farooq d,e,f, Simon P. Loader g, Michele Menegon h and Krystal A. Tolley i,j aPort Elizabeth Museum (Bayworld), Marine Drive, Humewood 6013, South Africa; bSchool of Natural Resource Management, George Campus, Nelson Mandela University, George 6530, South Africa; cDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, Basel
  • Evolution of Oviductal Gestation in Amphibians MARVALEE H

    Evolution of Oviductal Gestation in Amphibians MARVALEE H

    THE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY 266394-413 (1993) Evolution of Oviductal Gestation in Amphibians MARVALEE H. WAKE Department of Integrative Biology and Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California,Berkeley, California 94720 ABSTRACT Oviductal retention of developing embryos, with provision for maternal nutrition after yolk is exhausted (viviparity) and maintenance through metamorphosis, has evolved indepen- dently in each of the three living orders of amphibians, the Anura (frogs and toads), the Urodela (salamanders and newts), and the Gymnophiona (caecilians). In anurans and urodeles obligate vivi- parity is very rare (less than 1%of species); a few additional species retain the developing young, but nutrition is yolk-dependent (ovoviviparity) and, at least in salamanders, the young may be born be- fore metamorphosis is complete. However, in caecilians probably the majority of the approximately 170 species are viviparous, and none are ovoviviparous. All of the amphibians that retain their young oviductally practice internal fertilization; the mechanism is cloaca1 apposition in frogs, spermato- phore reception in salamanders, and intromission in caecilians. Internal fertilization is a necessary but not sufficient exaptation (sensu Gould and Vrba: Paleobiology 8:4-15, ’82) for viviparity. The sala- manders and all but one of the frogs that are oviductal developers live at high altitudes and are subject to rigorous climatic variables; hence, it has been suggested that cold might be a “selection pressure” for the evolution of egg retention. However, one frog and all the live-bearing caecilians are tropical low to middle elevation inhabitants, so factors other than cold are implicated in the evolu- tion of live-bearing.
  • Nectophrynoides Tornieri (Anura: Bufonidae) in the Amani Nature Reserve, Tanzania“

    Nectophrynoides Tornieri (Anura: Bufonidae) in the Amani Nature Reserve, Tanzania“

    DIPLOMARBEIT Titel der Diplomarbeit „The „push-up“ as a calling posture in Nectophrynoides tornieri (Anura: Bufonidae) in the Amani Nature Reserve, Tanzania“ Verfasserin Iris Starnberger angestrebter akademischer Grad Magistra der Naturwissenschaften (Mag.rer.nat.) Wien, 2011 Studienkennzahl lt. A 439 Studienblatt: Studienrichtung lt. Diplomstudium Zoologie (Stzw) UniStG Studienblatt: Betreuerin / Betreuer: Ao. Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Walter Hödl Für meine Eltern und meine Schwester Sonja, die mich immer liebevoll unterstützt und ermutigt haben. 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................4 MATERIALS AND METHODS.......................................................................................................................8 STUDY SITE ......................................................................................................................................................................... 8 EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN ................................................................................................................................................... 8 HABITAT FEATURES....................................................................................................................................................... 10 DATA ANALYSIS .............................................................................................................................................................
  • Amphibiaweb's Illustrated Amphibians of the Earth

    Amphibiaweb's Illustrated Amphibians of the Earth

    AmphibiaWeb's Illustrated Amphibians of the Earth Created and Illustrated by the 2020-2021 AmphibiaWeb URAP Team: Alice Drozd, Arjun Mehta, Ash Reining, Kira Wiesinger, and Ann T. Chang This introduction to amphibians was written by University of California, Berkeley AmphibiaWeb Undergraduate Research Apprentices for people who love amphibians. Thank you to the many AmphibiaWeb apprentices over the last 21 years for their efforts. Edited by members of the AmphibiaWeb Steering Committee CC BY-NC-SA 2 Dedicated in loving memory of David B. Wake Founding Director of AmphibiaWeb (8 June 1936 - 29 April 2021) Dave Wake was a dedicated amphibian biologist who mentored and educated countless people. With the launch of AmphibiaWeb in 2000, Dave sought to bring the conservation science and basic fact-based biology of all amphibians to a single place where everyone could access the information freely. Until his last day, David remained a tirelessly dedicated scientist and ally of the amphibians of the world. 3 Table of Contents What are Amphibians? Their Characteristics ...................................................................................... 7 Orders of Amphibians.................................................................................... 7 Where are Amphibians? Where are Amphibians? ............................................................................... 9 What are Bioregions? ..................................................................................10 Conservation of Amphibians Why Save Amphibians? .............................................................................
  • The Impact of Anchored Phylogenomics and Taxon Sampling on Phylogenetic Inference in Narrow-Mouthed Frogs (Anura, Microhylidae)

    The Impact of Anchored Phylogenomics and Taxon Sampling on Phylogenetic Inference in Narrow-Mouthed Frogs (Anura, Microhylidae)

    Cladistics Cladistics (2015) 1–28 10.1111/cla.12118 The impact of anchored phylogenomics and taxon sampling on phylogenetic inference in narrow-mouthed frogs (Anura, Microhylidae) Pedro L.V. Pelosoa,b,*, Darrel R. Frosta, Stephen J. Richardsc, Miguel T. Rodriguesd, Stephen Donnellane, Masafumi Matsuif, Cristopher J. Raxworthya, S.D. Bijug, Emily Moriarty Lemmonh, Alan R. Lemmoni and Ward C. Wheelerj aDivision of Vertebrate Zoology (Herpetology), American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA; bRichard Gilder Graduate School, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA; cHerpetology Department, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; dDepartamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociencias,^ Universidade de Sao~ Paulo, Rua do Matao,~ Trav. 14, n 321, Cidade Universitaria, Caixa Postal 11461, CEP 05422-970, Sao~ Paulo, Sao~ Paulo, Brazil; eCentre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; fGraduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan; gSystematics Lab, Department of Environmental Studies, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India; hDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA; iDepartment of Scientific Computing, Florida State University, Dirac Science Library, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4120, USA; jDivision of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA Accepted 4 February 2015 Abstract Despite considerable progress in unravelling the phylogenetic relationships of microhylid frogs, relationships among subfami- lies remain largely unstable and many genera are not demonstrably monophyletic.
  • An Action Plan for Darwin's Frogs Brings Key Stakeholders Together

    An Action Plan for Darwin's Frogs Brings Key Stakeholders Together

    A flagship for Austral temperate forest conservation: an action plan for Darwin's frogs brings key stakeholders together C LAUDIO A ZAT,ANDRÉS V ALENZUELA-SÁNCHEZ,SOLEDAD D ELGADO A NDREW A. CUNNINGHAM,MARIO A LVARADO-RYBAK,JOHARA B OURKE R AÚL B RIONES,OSVALDO C ABEZA,CAMILA C ASTRO-CARRASCO,ANDRES C HARRIER C LAUDIO C ORREA,MARTHA L. CRUMP,CÉSAR C. CUEVAS,MARIANO DE LA M AZA S ANDRA D ÍAZ-VIDAL,EDGARDO F LORES,GEMMA H ARDING,ESTEBAN O. LAVILLA M ARCO A. MENDEZ,FRANK O BERWEMMER,JUAN C ARLOS O RTIZ,HERNÁN P ASTORE A LEXANDRA P EÑAFIEL-RICAURTE,LEONORA R OJAS-SALINAS J OSÉ M ANUEL S ERRANO,MAXIMILIANO A. SEPÚLVEDA,VERÓNICA T OLEDO C ARMEN Ú BEDA,DAVID E. URIBE-RIVERA,CATALINA V ALDIVIA S ALLY W REN and A RIADNE A NGULO Abstract Darwin’sfrogsRhinoderma darwinii and Rhino- the Austral temperate forests of Chile and Argentina. This derma rufum are the only known species of amphibians recommendation forms part of the vision of the Bination- in which males brood their offspring in their vocal sacs. We al Conservation Strategy for Darwin’sFrogs,whichwas propose these frogs as flagship species for the conservation of launched in . The strategy is a conservation initiative CLAUDIO AZAT* (Corresponding author, orcid.org/0000-0001-9201-7886), EDGARDO FLORES* Fundación Nahuelbuta Natural, Cañete, Chile MARIO ALVARADO-RYBAK*, ALEXANDRA PEÑAFIEL-RICAURTE* and CATALINA VALDIVIA GEMMA HARDING* Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Sustainability Research Centre, Life Sciences Faculty, Universidad Andres Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK Bello, Republica 440, Santiago, Chile.
  • Spatial Ecology of the Giant Burrowing Frog (Heleioporus Australiacus): Implications for Conservation Prescriptions

    Spatial Ecology of the Giant Burrowing Frog (Heleioporus Australiacus): Implications for Conservation Prescriptions

    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Science - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health January 2008 Spatial ecology of the giant burrowing frog (Heleioporus australiacus): implications for conservation prescriptions Trent D. Penman University of Wollongong, [email protected] F Lemckert M J Mahony Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/scipapers Part of the Life Sciences Commons, Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Penman, Trent D.; Lemckert, F; and Mahony, M J: Spatial ecology of the giant burrowing frog (Heleioporus australiacus): implications for conservation prescriptions 2008, 179-186. https://ro.uow.edu.au/scipapers/724 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Spatial ecology of the giant burrowing frog (Heleioporus australiacus): implications for conservation prescriptions Abstract Management of threatened anurans requires an understanding of a species’ behaviour and habitat requirements in both the breeding and non-breeding environments. The giant burrowing frog (Heleioporus australiacus) is a threatened species in south-eastern Australia. Little is known about its habitat requirements, creating difficulties in vde eloping management strategies for the species.Weradio-tracked 33 individual H. australiacus in order to determine their habitat use and behaviour. Data from 33 frogs followed for between 5 and 599 days show that individuals spend little time near (<15 >m) their breeding sites (mean 4.7 days for males and 6.3 days for females annually). Most time is spent in distinct non- breeding activity areas 20–250m from the breeding sites.
  • Bulletin Zoölogisch Museum

    Bulletin Zoölogisch Museum

    Bulletin Zoölogisch Museum UNIVERSITEIT VAN AMSTERDAM Vol. 14 No. 8 1995 Revised catalogue of the type specimens of Recent Amphibians and Reptiles in the “Zoölogisch Museum” University of Amsterdam the Netherlands L. van Tuijl INTRODUCTION This is a revision of the catalogue issued in 1966 Reptilia: Ablepharus boutonii furcata (syntype), (Daan & Hillenius) of type specimens of amphibians Ablepharus burnetti (2 syntypes), Gehyra interstitialis and reptiles in the collections of the ”Zoologisch (holotype), Lygosoma florense (2 syntypes), Museum Amsterdam” (ZMA), also named: Institute Lygosoma minutum rotundirostrum (syntype), for Systematics and Population Biology, of the Lygosoma mivarti obscurum (6 syntypes) Lygosoma University of Amsterdam.These include 51 holotypes, verreauxii biunguimaculata (3 syntypes). 1 neotype, 20 lectotypes, 84 syntypes, 63 paralecto- types, 187 paratypes; only the type specimens in ZMA collection are recorded. Curators of the Amphibia / Reptilia collection of the In many cases, type specimens have been sent to ZMA, (Zoologisch Museum Amsterdam) were: Prof. other museums: AMS, BMNH, EHT, FMNH, MCZ, Max (C. W.) Weber from 1883 to 1922, Dr. P. N. van NMBA, NMW, RMNH, UNSM, and ZSM. Kampen from 1900 to 1905, Dr. Nelly (P. J.) de Rooy The following type specimens are missing in the ZMA from 1907 to 1922, Prof. L. F. de Beaufort from 1922 collection: to 1949, and Dr. D. Hillenius from 1954 to 1987. At Amphibia: Chaperina basipalmata (syntype), Choe- the moment the collections are curated by the author rophryne proboscidea (holotype), Dyscophina volzi (2 with assistance of Dr. H. Nijssen. paralectotypes), Metopostira macra (holotype), Whenever possible, the remaining type specimens Nectophryne sumatrana (2 paralectotypes), Rana in other collections are mentioned.