DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix D Cultural Resources Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix D Cultural Resources Assessment APPENDIX D CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT REPORT Page intentionally left blank CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT REPORT MOONLITE LANES APARTMENTS PROJECT 2780 EL CAMINO REAL CITY OF SANTA CLARA, SANTA CLARA COUNTY FOR CIRCLEPOINT 40 A/B South First Street San Jose, CA 95113 ATTN: Ms. Audrey M. Zagazeta Project Director BY BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 1933 Davis Street, Suite 210 San Leandro, CA 94577 AUGUST 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 1-2 2.1 LOCATION 1 2.2 DESCRIPTION 1-2 2.3 AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS (APE) 2 3.0 REGULATORY CONTEXT 2-7 3.1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2-3 3.2 CITY OF SANTA CLARA 3-7 4.0 METHDOLOGY 7-8 5.0 BACKGROUND CONTEXT 8-18 5.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 8-9 5.2 NATIVE AMERICAN 10-13 5.2A Prehistoric 10-12 5.2B Ethnographic 13 5.3 HISTORIC ERA 13-18 5.3A Hispanic Period 14 5.3B American Period 15-17 5.4 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SENSITIVITY 17-18 6.0 PRE-FIELD IDENTIFICATION EFFORT 18 6.1 RECORDS SEARCH RESULTS 18 6.1A Recorded Sites and/or Reported Sites 18 6.1B Compliance Reports 18 6.2 LISTED HISTORIC PROPERTIES 18 7.0 INDIVIDUALS, GROUP AND AGENCY PARTICIPATION 18-19 8.0 FIELD INVENTORY 19 9.0 BUILT ENVIRONMENT REVIEW 19-21 10.0 FINDINGS 21-22 11.0 CULTURAL RESOURCE IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 22-25 11.1 DEFINITION OF IMPACTS 29-24 11.2 MITIGATION MEASURES 24-25 12.0 REFERENCES CITED AND CONSULTED 26-35 ATTACHMENTS FIGURES FIGURE 1 General Project Location FIGURE 2 Project Location (USGS San Jose West, Calif. 1980) FIGURE 3 Aerial View of Project Area FORMS FORM 1 DPR 523 Primary Form with Building, Structure and Object Record - AMF Moonlite Lanes Bowling, 2780 El Camino Real, Santa Clara by Ward Hill. August 2015. CORRESPONDENCE LETTER Request to Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for Review of Sacred Lands Inventory LETTER NAHC Response LETTERS Request to Native Americans Identified by the NAHC CHRIS/NWIC SEARCH RESULTS SEARCH 1 File No. 14-1747 dated 7/02/2015 (No Confidential Information) 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Cultural Resources Assessment Report (CRAR) for the proposed Moonlite Lanes Apartments, 2780 El Camino Real, City of Santa Clara, Santa Clara County provides the results of a records search conducted by the California Historical Resources Information System, Northwest Information Center (CHRIS/NWIC); a limited literature review; Native American Heritage Commission consultation; an architectural field review of the existing building; and, a discussion of potential impacts and proposed mitigation measures. An archaeological field review was not undertaken due to the developed nature of the parcel and the lack of native soil exposures. The intent of this CRAR was to determine if significant cultural resources under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) could be affected by the proposed project. 2.0 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 2.1 LOCATION [Figs. 1-3] The approximate 2.88 acre project is occupied by the AMF Moonlite Lanes, a bowling alley located at 2780 El Camino Real approximately 540 feet south of the southeast corner of the intersection of El Camino Real and Kiely Boulevard, City of Santa Clara (APN 290-16-018). The project parcel is separated by a driveway/alley from the Moonlite Shopping Center to the north, residential development to the south and east, and Kiely Boulevard to the west. The west side of the project parcel is about opposite between Butte Street and Fresno Avenue as they terminate on the west side of Kiely Boulevard. The eastern boundary of the project parcel is formed by Hampton Knoll Drive, a private street, and the west end of Moonlite Place. The northern end of Crowley Avenue terminates about mid-way along the southern boundary of the project parcel (Google Earth 2015; PII Environmental 2015:4, 31-32 [APN map]; United States Geological Survey [hereafter USGS], San Jose West, Calif. 1980, 7.5' quadrangle topographic map, Township 7 South, Range 1 West (T 7S R 1W), NW ¼ of SE ¼ of Section 4). 2.2 DESCRIPTION The site is currently occupied by the AMF Moonlite Lanes complex, surrounding asphalt concrete parking lots and landscaped areas with primarily small shrubs and mature trees (Cornerstone Earth Group [CEG] 2015:3). The Prometheus Real Estate Group, Inc. plans to redevelop the approximate 2.88 acre site with an apartment complex with a total of 158 units consisting of 4-story, at-grade residential structures with a central 5-level parking structure with a total of 260 spaces with one level of parking below grade. Main access would be from Kiely Boulevard at the northwest corner of the project with fire access at the northeast corner from the alley along the north side of the parcel. The project also includes landscaping and other improvements necessary for site development (CEG 2015:1) The 2010-2015 Land Use Diagram in the City of Santa Clara 2010-2035 General Plan designates the project site for Regional Mixed Use in Phase I: 2010-2015 and Phase II: 2015- 2025, and Phase III: 2025-2035. The construction of the proposed project will implement Phase 2 III of the General Plan within the El Camino Real Focus Area (2035) (SC/PD 2010:5-21, Fig. 5.2-1, 5-23, Fig. 5.2-3, 2010:5-43, Fig. 5.4-1). 2.3 AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS (APE) The Area of Potential Effects (APE) includes all areas where direct or indirect impacts may occur within the development parcels. The horizontal and vertical Area of Potential Effects (APE) consists of the maximum area of surface and subsurface disturbance with anticipated excavation depths of at least 15 feet below the present ground surface for the one level of subterranean parking and existing and project-related utilities. 3.0 REGULATORY CONTEXT Cultural resources include prehistoric and historic archaeological sites, districts, and objects; standing historic structures, buildings, districts, and objects; and locations of important historic events or sites of traditional and/or cultural importance to various groups. The analysis of cultural resources can provide valuable information on the cultural heritage of both local and regional populations. Cultural resources may be determined significant or potentially significant in terms of national, state, or local criteria either individually or in combination. Resource evaluation criteria are determined by the compliance requirements of a specific project. 3.1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA This report has been prepared to meet applicable California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Historic Preservation Goals and Policies of the City of Santa Clara’s General Plan for historic properties (cultural resources) which require the identification and evaluation of cultural resources that could be affected by the project. The California Register of Historical Resources (Public Resources Code Section 5024.1) is a listing of those properties that are to be protected from substantial adverse change, and it includes properties that are listed, or have been formally determined to be eligible for listing in, the National Register of Historic Places, State Historical Landmarks, and eligible Points of Historical Interest. A historical resource may be listed in the California Register of Historical Resources if it meets one or more of the following criteria: It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States; It is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history; It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values; or, It has yielded or has the potential to yield information important in the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. 3 Historical Resources Public Resources Code Section 21084.1 stipulates that any resource listed in, or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, is presumed to be historically or culturally significant. Resources listed in a local historic register or deemed significant in a historical resource survey (as provided under Public Resources Code Section 5024.1g) are presumed historically or culturally significant unless the preponderance of evidence demonstrates they are not. A resource that is not listed in or determined to be eligible for listing in the Public Resources Code, not included in a local register or historic resources, or not deemed significant in a historical resource survey may nonetheless be historically significant (Public Resources Code Section 21084.1). This provision is intended to give the Lead Agency discretion to determine that a resource of historic significance exists where none had been identified before and to apply the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21084.1 to properties that have not previously been formally recognized as historic. The California Environmental Quality Act equates a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource with a significant effect on the environment (Public Resources Code Section 21084.1) and defines substantial adverse change as demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration that would impair historical significance (Public Resources Code Section 5020.1). Archaeological Resources Where a project may adversely affect a unique archaeological resource, Public Resources Code Section 21083.2 requires the Lead Agency to treat that effect as a significant environmental effect. When an archaeological resource is listed in or is eligible to be listed in the California Register of Historical Resources, Public Resources Code Section 21084.1 requires that any substantial adverse effect to that resource be considered a significant environmental effect. Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2 and 21084.1 operate independently to ensure that potential effects on archaeological resources are considered as part of a project's environmental analysis.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historical Resource Evaluation
    ATTACHMENT 2 LPC 11-05-15 Page 1 of 44 HISTORICAL RESOURCE EVALUATION 2556 TELEGRAPH AVENUE BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA TIM KELLEY CONSULTING, LLC HISTORICAL RESOURCES 2912 DIAMOND STREET #330 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94131 415.337-5824 [email protected] ATTACHMENT 2 LPC 11-05-15 HISTORICAL RESOURCE EVALUATION 2556 TELEGRAPH AVENUE BERKELEY, CALIFORNIAPage 2 of 44 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Tim Kelley Consulting (TKC) was engaged to conduct an Historical Resource Evaluation (HRE) for 2556 Telegraph Avenue, a steel frame brick faced commercial building constructed circa 1946, with a 1962 addition, in Berkeley’s LeConte neighborhood. TKC conducted a field survey, background research of public records, and a literature and map review to evaluate the subject property according to the significance criteria for the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) and the City of Berkeley’s Landmarks Preservation Ordinance. Subsequent sections of this report present the detailed results of TKC’s research. Based on that research, TKC concludes that 2556 Telegraph is not eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, nor does it appear eligible for listing as a City Landmark, Structure of Merit, or contributor to an identified historic district. Accordingly, 2556 Telegraph does not appear to be a historical resource for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act. REV 2. MARCH 2015 TIM KELLEY CONSULTING -1- ATTACHMENT 2 LPC 11-05-15 HISTORICAL RESOURCE EVALUATION 2556 TELEGRAPH AVENUE BERKELEY, CALIFORNIAPage 3 of 44 II. METHODS A records search, literature review, archival research, consultation, field survey, and eligibility evaluation were conducted for this study. Each task is described below.
    [Show full text]
  • Berkeley Architectural Heritage Society Oral History Project ELLA
    Berkeley Architectural Heritage Society Oral History Project ELLA (BARROWS) HAGAR 'Mediterranean~Stvle'in'fheeBerkelev Hills 245 Stonewall Road Berkeley, California 94705 Architect: WILLIAEi IURSTER Completed in 1928 in Holabird Garber Park and other subdivisions JOHN GARBER ESTATE Kellersberger's Plot No. 77 Interviewer Rosemary Levenson 261 Stonewall Road Berkeley, CA 94705 Regional Oral History Office Berkeley Architectural The Bancroft Library Heritage Society University of California P.O. Box 7066 Berkeley, California 94720 Landscape Station Berkeley, California 94707 TABLE OF CONTENTS--Ella (Barrows) Hagar Mediterranean Style in the Berkeley Hills FRONTISPIECE INTERVIEW HISTORY i AGENDA iii SAMPLE CONTRACT iv BERKELEY ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE ASSOCIATION QUESTIONNAIRE v Choosing a Lot Architects and Architectural Styles Early Houses on Upper Stonewall Road Berkeley Address and Oakland Taxes The Garber Family John Garber Park and the City of Berkeley Quarry Cars and Steep Streets The Stonewall Community Annual Christmas Pageant A Closed Right of Way and Old Fish Ranch Road The John Roosevelts on Stonewall Road Levensons Move Next Door INDEX INTERVIEW HISTORY Ella Hagar's recollections of the development of the upper part of Stone- wall Road were recorded as a pilot oral history project for the Berkeley Architectural Heritage Association. The impetus was the interviewer's curiosity about the history of her own neighborhood. B.A.H.A.'s encouragement led to the completion of the project. We hope that others will also be encouraged to record the reminiscences of their knowledgeable neighbors and friends and thus preserve memories of the early history of Berkeley's buildings and neighborhoods that would otherwise be lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resource Evaluation the Former Joseph C. Laney
    HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION FOR THE FORMER JOSEPH C. LANEY TECHNICAL & TRADE INSTITUTE 314 E. 10TH STREET OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR PMC BY KELLEY & VERPLANCK HISTORICAL RESOURCES CONSULTING, LLC April 19, 2010 KELLEY & VERPLANCK HISTORICAL RESOURCES CONSULTING 2912 DIAMOND STREET #330, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94131 415.337.5824 // WWW.KVPCONSULTING.COM Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 1 II. METHODOLOGY............................................................................................................ 1 III. EXISTING HISTORIC STATUS ....................................................................................... 2 IV. ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION .................................................................................. 3 V. HISTORIC CONTEXT(S) ............................................................................................... 13 VI. EVALUATION FOR SIGNIFICANCE ............................................................................. 27 VII. CONCLUSION............................................................................................................ 30 VIII. BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................ 32 Historic Resource Evaluation Joseph C. Laney Technical & Trade Institute Oakland, California I. Introduction This Historic Resource Evaluation (HRE) was prepared in April 2010 by Kelley & VerPlanck Historical
    [Show full text]
  • GO Uptown Gateway to Oakland Uptown 2016 TIGER Grant Application
    GO Uptown Gateway to Oakland Uptown 2016 TIGER Grant Application Lead Applicant San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Tranist (BART) District Supporting Applicant City of Oakland, California Contact Information Val Menotti Chief Planning and Development Officer BART Planning and Devleopment 300 Lakeside Dr., 21st Floor Oakland, CA 94612 [email protected] (510) 287-4794 Project Type Urban, Transit, Complete Streets Project Cost $28.6 million TIGER 2016 Funds Requested $6.3 million TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PROJECT INTRODUCTION AND DESCRIPTION 2 2. PROJECT LOCATION 6 2.1. Area Characteristics 6 2.2. Project Location Transportation Connections 6 3. PROJECT PARTIES 9 4. GRANT FUNDS AND SOURCES/USES OF PROJECT FUNDS 10 4.1. Capital Sources of Funds 10 4.2. Capital Uses of Funds 10 4.3. Summary of Operating Sources and Uses of Funds 12 5. SELECTION CRITERIA 12 5.1. Primary Selection Criteria 12 5.2. Secondary Criteria 23 6. BCA RESULTS 24 7. PROJECT READINESS 25 7.1. Technical Feasibility 25 7.2. Financial Feasibility 25 7.3. Project Schedule 26 7.4. Required Approvals 26 8. FEDERAL WAGE RATE CERTIFICATION 27 APPENDICES Appendix I Benefit-Cost Analysis Appendix II Letters of Support Appendix III Evidence of Proposition 1B Funding Commitment TIGER 2016 Grant Application: GO Uptown 1. PROJECT INTRODUCTION AND DESCRIPTION The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) is a critical component to the region’s economy. Each weekday, the BART heavy rail system carries over 430,000 passengers to jobs, education and training, healthcare, and other destinations over a 93 square mile service area.
    [Show full text]
  • 51 West 28Th Street Building, Tin Pan Alley
    DESIGNATION REPORT 51 West 28th Street Building, Tin Pan Alley Landmarks Preservation Designation Report Designation List 516 Commission 51 West 28th Street LP-2628 December 10, 2019 DESIGNATION REPORT 51 West 28th Street Building, Tin Pan Alley LOCATION Borough of Manhattan 51 West 28th Street LANDMARK TYPE Individual SIGNIFICANCE Built c.1852 as an Italianate-style row house, 49 West 28th Street was the site of numerous musicians’ and sheet music publishers’ offices in the 1890s-1900s, part of a block known as “Tin Pan Alley.” Landmarks Preservation Designation Report Designation List 516 Commission 51 West 28th Street LP-2628 December 10, 2019 47, 49, 51, 53, and 55 West 28th Street, December 2019 LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS Lisa Kersavage, Executive Director Sarah Carroll, Chair Mark Silberman, General Counsel Frederick Bland, Vice Chair Timothy Frye, Director of Special Projects and Diana Chapin Strategic Planning Wellington Chen Kate Lemos McHale, Director of Research Michael Devonshire Cory Herrala, Director of Preservation Michael Goldblum John Gustafsson REPORT BY Anne Holford-Smith Sarah Moses, Research Department Everardo Jefferson Jeanne Lutfy Adi Shamir-Baron EDITED BY Kate Lemos McHale PHOTOGRAPHS BY Sarah Moses Landmarks Preservation Designation Report Designation List 516 Commission 51 West 28th Street LP-2628 December 10, 2019 3 of 50 Table of Contents 5 Testimony at the Public Hearing 6 Editorial Note 8 Summary 10 Building Description 11 History and Significance of Tin Pan Alley 11 Early Site History
    [Show full text]
  • The BG News September 25, 1975
    Bowling Green State University ScholarWorks@BGSU BG News (Student Newspaper) University Publications 9-25-1975 The BG News September 25, 1975 Bowling Green State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/bg-news Recommended Citation Bowling Green State University, "The BG News September 25, 1975" (1975). BG News (Student Newspaper). 3142. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/bg-news/3142 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Publications at ScholarWorks@BGSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in BG News (Student Newspaper) by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@BGSU. By Cindy Smercina "We also hope to be able to get school. We in turn give them tuition Hospitals are phasing out their Staff Reporter more funding for the school," he and some of our subsidies. nursing school programs because a continued. "In five years we have "But we fully recognize the hospital can't afford what we can." Approval for the creation of a grown from a small nursing nursing faculty as our own. We School of Nursing in the College of program to one that has the status don't want them to feel like second HE ESTIMATED the cost of i he Health and Community Services of a School of Nursing. We've given class citizens," emphasized Dr. nursing program's instructional was granted by the Board of the School of Nursing more Balogh. Nursing staff members can staff alone to be nearly 5500,000 Trustees last month.
    [Show full text]
  • Top of Page Interview Information--Different Title
    Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California EARL T. WATKINS: JAZZ DRUMMER AND UNION OFFICIAL Interviews conducted by Caroline Crawford in 2003 Copyright © 2011 by The Regents of the University of California Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral History is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is bound with photographs and illustrative materials and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ********************************* All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and Earl Watkins, dated September 30, 2003. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley. Excerpts up to 1000 words from this interview may be quoted for publication without seeking permission as long as the use is non-commercial and properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • ZAB NOD Template
    L ANDMARKS P RES ERV A T I O N C OMMISSION Notice of Decision DATE OF COMMISSION DECISION: December 3, 2015 DATE NOTICE MAILED: December 8, 2015 APPEAL PERIOD EXPIRATION: January 26, 2016 EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION (Barring Appeal or Certification): January 27, 20161 2777 Shattuck Avenue Landmark Initiation Application (LMIN#2015-0002) for consideration of City of Berkeley, Landmark designation for the former Berkeley Bowl building, located at 2777 Shattuck Avenue. The Landmarks Preservation Commission of the City of Berkeley, after conducting a public hearing, APPROVED the following designation: DESIGNATION: Landmark Structure of Merit APPLICANT: Steve Finacom, 2308 Russell Street, Berkeley, CA 94705 ZONING DISTRICT: C-SA South Area Commercial, R-2, Restricted Multiple-Family Residential ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS: The initiation qualifies for a Categorical Exemption under Sections 15061 of the Public Resources Code, Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as an activity which does not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. The application materials for this project are available online at: http://www.cityofberkeley.info/zoningapplications 1 Pursuant to BMC Section 1.04.070, if the close of the appeal period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the appeal period expires the following business day. Pursuant to BMC Section 3.24.190, the City Council may “certify” any decision of the LPC for review, within fifteen days from the mailing of the NOD. Such certification
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-04-21 APP PCKT 2556 Telegraph.Pdf
    2556 Telegraph Avenue April 16, 2015 Applicant Statement Applicant: Telegraph/Blake LLC 2342 Shattuck Ave. #171 Berkeley, CA 94704 This proposed project is a 7-story mixed-use residential and retail development. The ground floor will be activated by a prominent retail storefront fronting Telegraph Avenue. A residential lobby/lounge will be located along the Blake Street frontage. This lobby/lounge will serve as the principal entrance to all of the residential units in the building, two live/work units and a bike storage room with one space for each unit. The alleyway on the west side of the site (Chilton Alley) will provide access to a quiet rear yard serving as the secondary entrance to the bike storage room, the second live/work unit and the buildings maintenance office/storage room. Above the podium we propose 6 levels of housing, with 13 units per floor on the first 5 floors and 11 units on the 6th floor with a total of 76 units. A typical floor will have 6 studio, 4 one bedroom and 3 two bedroom units. All units will be provided with an in-unit washer/dryer, one bathroom and a kitchenette. The rear yard will provide the interior bedrooms and studios with ample natural light and ventilation along with a landscaped open space that will receive 5+ hours of afternoon sunlight. The roof deck will provide additional open space for residents and be accessed by the elevator and both stairways. The rooftop open space will include a variety of seating, shading, planting and other amenities, along with sweeping views of the bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Oakland Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board
    Oakland Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board OAKLAND LANDMARK, S-7/S20 PRESERVATION COMBINING ZONE, AND HERITAGE PROPERTY APPLICATION FORM ================================================================================= This form is for use in requesting the City of Oakland pursuant to its Zoning Regulations to establish a landmark, landmark site, or Heritage Property or to rezone one or more properties to the S-7 or S-20 Preservation Combining Zone. 1. IDENTIFICATION A. Historic Name: ____Grand Alley Cafe____________________________________________ B. and/or Common Name: _______The Alley_________________________________________ 2. ADDRESS/LOCATION Street and number: _____3325 Grand Avenue (3321-27)________________ Zip Code: ____94610_____ 3. CLASSIFICATION A. Category D. Present Use (P) and Historic Use (H) ____District ____Agriculture ____Museum _X _Building(s) P, H Commercial ____Park ____Structure ____Educational P, H Private Residence (upstairs) ____Site P, H Entertainment ____Religious ____Object ____Government ____Scientific ____Industrial ____Transportation B. Status ____Military ____Other (Specify): _X _Occupied ____Unoccupied ____Work in progress E. Number of Resources within Property Contributing Non-contributing C. Accessible __1_ ____buildings ____Yes: restricted ____ ____sites _X _Yes: unrestricted ____ ____structures ____No ____ ____objects ____ ____Total F. Application for: ____City Landmark ____ S-7 District _X _Heritage Property ____ S-20 District The Alley, 3325 Grand Avenue - 2 - FORM LPAB-4 4. OWNER OF PROPERTY
    [Show full text]
  • C.3 Stormwater Technical Guidance
    C.3 Stormwater Technical Guidance October 31, 2017 MEMBER AGENCIES: A handbook for Alameda Albany developers, Berkeley Dublin builders and Emeryville project Fremont Hayward applicants Livermore Newark Oakland Version 6 Piedmont Pleasanton San Leandro Union City County of Alameda Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Zone 7 Water Agency C.3 STORMWATER TECHNICAL GUIDANCE Errata and Edits to Version 6 All errata listed are effective immediately, including those not yet corrected in the applicable sections of the C.3 Stormwater Technical Guidance. The following errata have been corrected in the online version of the manual: Errata Section of C.3 Technical Date Errata Guidance Completed 1 Added the following bullet point under the headings of 4.5.1 4/4/18 “Planting New Interceptor Trees” and “Preserving Existing Interceptor Trees”: . An interceptor tree must be located in the same Drainage Management Area (DMA) to which the interceptor tree credit is assigned. 2 Updated the ACCWP weblink for documents related to Appendix K 4/20/18 biotreatment soil specifications, included the Biotreatment Soil Mix Specification Verification Checklist, as follows: . www.cleanwaterprogram.org/index.php/c3-guidance- table.html ERRATA AND EDITS C.3 STORMWATER TECHNICAL GUIDANCE Local Contacts Please contact the local agency with any questions regarding requirements specific to the local jurisdiction, using contact information provided below. Alameda (City): Public Works Department, 510.747.7930 Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District: 510.670.5543 339 Elmhurst Street, 1st Floor, Permit Center, Hayward, CA 94544 Albany: Community Development and Environmental Resources Department 1000 San Pablo Avenue, Albany, CA 94706.
    [Show full text]