DOCSLIB.ORG

Artillery Tutorial

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Artillery Tutorial FOR TRAINING USE ONLY TST-204 Self-Propelled Artillery Weapon (SPAW) Artillery Tutorial Introduction The following is a brief tutorial on artillery nomenclature and operation, to assist you in understanding the TST-204 exercise material. The purpose is not to make you artillery testers, but to give you just enough background information so you recognize key elements of the SPAW system and its operation, and so you don’t get distracted by unfamiliar terms. This tutorial is organized into four main areas to cover the basics of artillery gun types, artillery operation, gunnery fundamentals, and artillery organization. The explanations and definitions in this tutorial come from various sources, with the majority of the information from the Army Field Manual (FM) 6-40 “Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for Field Artillery Manual Cannon Gunnery”. The student is encouraged to use official current guidance for more detailed information; or prior to real-world operation or test and evaluation of artillery systems. Army FM 6-40 provides a concise statement of the mission of Field Artillery – “The mission of the Field Artillery is to destroy, neutralize, or suppress the enemy by cannon, rocket, and missile fires and to help integrate all fire support assets into combined arms operations.” The SPAW system provides cannon fire to accomplish its portion of the field artillery mission. The term “cannon” is a general term used when referring to artillery. It refers to an artillery gun or a howitzer, which are defined below. Artillery Gun Types Artillery generally refers to large-caliber weaponry that are operated by a crew, as opposed to small arms or weaponry carried and fired by individual troops. Types of artillery include: Guns – Which fires at a high muzzle velocity through relatively long barrels and with a flat trajectory. Examples would be antiaircraft or antitank guns. Howitzers – Artillery weapons that have relatively short barrels, lower muzzle velocities, and more parabolic trajectories. Mortars – Generally small tactical munitions fired from short tubes. Mortars are fired with a high trajectory and have a relatively short range. FOR TRAINING USE ONLY Figure 1: Typical Trajectories (Field Manual 6-40) Artillery is usually ranked as light, medium, or heavy. Light refers to projectiles up to 105mm for close support of ground troops, medium at 106 – 155mm for bombardment, and heavy, with projectiles over 155mm for attacking rear installations. Artillery is also classified according to the method of ground transportation, either towed or self-propelled. Towed artillery is mounted on carriages and is designed to be towed behind other vehicles. Self-propelled artillery is mounted on tracked vehicles, and can move between firing positions under its’ own power. Towed artillery is generally lighter than self-propelled, but obviously requires a separate vehicle to tow it. Self-propelled artillery can be quicker to reposition to a new firing position. Artillery Gunnery Fundamentals There are some fundamental principles involved in operating artillery. The following are five basic requirements for achieving accurate artillery fire. The five basic requirements are: a. Target Location and Size. Establishing the range from the artillery weapons to the target requires accurate and timely detection, identification, and location of ground targets. Determining the appropriate time and type of attack requires that the target size (radius or other dimensions), makeup (i.e., troops, vehicles, bunker, etc), and the direction and speed of movement be considered. b. Firing Unit Location. Accurate aiming to the target requires accurately knowing artillery firing unit locations. There are different ways to determine the firing unit location, such as Global Positioning System (GPS) or site surveys. In addition to determining an accurate location for the firing unit, each howitzer in the firing unit must also be precisely positioned to make sure each projectile goes exactly where it was intended. One term that is prevalent in almost all weapon firing discussions is a mill radian – usually referred to as a “mil.” A mil is a measure of angle. Using a circle of 360 degrees does not provide enough precision, therefore artillery computations assume a complete circle is broken into 6400 mils. Pointing a howitzer requires two angle commands (given in mils): azimuth (horizontal direction FOR TRAINING USE ONLY measured from north) and elevation (vertical angle measured from level). In a practical sense, one mil of elevation or azimuth works out to be a change of one meter at a range of 1000 meters. c. Weapon and Ammunition Information. The actual performance of the weapon is measured by the weapon muzzle velocity (velocity with which the projectile leaves the muzzle of the tube) for a projectile-propellant combination. The firing battery can measure the achieved muzzle velocity of a weapon and correct it for nonstandard projectile weight and propellant temperature. A howitzer can fire different types of projectiles, depending upon the target, and each projectile can be fired with different propellant loads. The combinations can put different stresses on the artillery piece, which must be factored into the design, operation, and maintenance of the artillery system. (See the discussion on error sources below for additional details on common weapon and ammunition issues affecting cannon performance.) d. Meteorological Information. The effects of weather on the projectile in flight must be considered, and firing data must compensate for those effects. e. Computational Procedures. The computation of firing data must be accurate. Manual and automated techniques are designed to achieve accurate and timely delivery of fire. If these five requirements are met, the firing battery will be able to deliver accurate and timely fires in support of the ground troops. If the five requirements for accurate predicted fire cannot be met, changes can be made to compensate for nonstandard conditions. Sources of Error The five basic requirements provide for accurate artillery fire. Now let’s briefly address factors which can make it difficult to meet the requirements and hence adversely affect the accuracy of fire. The first major source of error is in the initial set-up and aiming of each artillery piece. If the howitzer is set up on perfectly level ground, then the error would be primarily from errors in location or misalignment of the zero point in azimuth. Since it is difficult to find perfectly level ground, then the set-up would also need to consider the slope of the terrain. Up or down slopes along the line of fire can introduce elevation errors. Slopes to the right or left of the line of fire, introduce leaning errors called “cant.” Cant causes errors in both azimuth and elevation. Artillery weapons must have an ability to correct for less than perfect site conditions, and they can compensate with mechanical means to level the weapon, and/or through corrections in the firing computations. If the artillery piece is properly sited, then the next major source of errors comes from unintended variations in firing the howitzer. Since muzzle velocity is the parameter usually measured to determine performance of the howitzer, FOR TRAINING USE ONLY anything that affects muzzle velocity becomes a potential error source. Nonstandard muzzle velocity is expressed as a variation (plus or minus so many meters per second) from the accepted standard. This figure illustrates how a tube’s standard muzzle velocity (m/s-meters per second) can vary from round to round depending on how the tube is cleaned. Some of the primary factors affecting muzzle velocity are: • Tolerances in new weapons. All new cannons of a given caliber and model will not necessarily develop the same muzzle velocity. Calibration of all cannons allows the firing unit to compensate for small variations in the manufacture of cannon tubes and the resulting variation in developed muzzle velocity. Once determined, the muzzle velocity variation caused by inconsistencies in tube manufacture remains constant and is valid for the life of the tube. • Tube wear. Continued firing of the cannon wears away portions of the bore by the actions of hot gases and chemicals and movement of the projectile within the tube. These erosive actions are more pronounced when higher charges are fired. The greater the tube wear, the more the muzzle velocity decreases. Normal wear can be minimized by careful selection of the charge and by proper cleaning of both the tube and the ammunition. • Propellant and projectile temperatures. Any combustible material burns more rapidly when heated before ignition. When a propellant burns more rapidly than would be expected under standard conditions, the muzzle velocity will be greater than standard and the projectile will travel farther. FOR TRAINING USE ONLY The time and type of exposure to the weather result in temperature variations from round to round and within the firing unit. • Moisture content of propellant. Since the moisture content cannot be measured or corrected for, the propellant must be provided maximum protection from the elements and from improper handling. • Weight of the projectile. In general terms, a heavier-than-standard projectile normally experiences a decrease in muzzle velocity. A lighter- than-standard projectile generally experiences an increase in velocity. • Coppering. When a projectile is fired, a thin film of material is left within the bore and is known as coppering. The amount of copper deposited varies with velocity. Firing higher charges increases the amount of copper deposited on the bore surfaces, whereas firing lower charges reduces the effects of coppering. Excessive coppering causes erratic velocity performance and must be removed by ordnance personnel. • Tube conditioning. The temperature of the tube has a direct bearing on the developed muzzle velocity. A cold tube offers a different resistance to projectile movement and is less susceptible to coppering, even at high velocities. In general, a cold tube yields more range dispersion; a hot tube, less range dispersion.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 16Th Infantry Division 47Th Field Artillery Camp Kearny, California Private John Leslie Banner
    16th Infantry Division 47th Field Artillery Camp Kearny, California Private John Leslie Banner John Leslie Banner, a son of Samuel Banner and Ellen Radford Banner, was born on November 5, 1896 in Upton, Utah. He was the tenth of eleven children in the family of seven girls and four boys. He entered the army on September 3, 1918 and was assigned to Camp Kearny, California where he was training in the field artillery. While training, he became ill with influenza and developed pneumonia. The military contacted his Mother and she traveled to Camp Kearny to be at his side when he died. Just before he died, he told his mother, “Tell the folks not to feel bad. I am one out of thousands”. He died on December 6, 1918. A military funeral was held at Camp Kearny before his body was shipped home. Funeral services were held at the Coalville, Utah cemetery and he was buried there. At the time of his death, he was survived by his parents, four sisters and two brothers: Mary Ellen, Elizabeth Ann, Lydia, Cora Leone, Samuel, and William Henry. He was preceded in death by three sisters and one brother: Frances Alice, Lydia May, Mabel, and Benjamin. During World War I, the 16th Division was renamed the 37th Infantry Division. The formation of another division designated as the 16th Division occurred in 1918 and was stationed at Camp Kearny, California. It never went overseas and it was one of several divisions in WWI that did not select an insignia. The Army has not designated a new division as the 16th since it was demobilized in March 1919..
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in International Arms Transfers, 2020 3
    SIPRI Fact Sheet March 2021 TRENDS IN INTERNATIONAL KEY FACTS w The volume of international ARMS TRANSFERS, 2020 transfers of major arms in 2016–20 was 0.5 per cent lower than in 2011–15 and 12 per cent pieter d. wezeman, alexandra kuimova and higher than in 2006–10. siemon t. wezeman w The five largest arms exporters in 2016–20 were the The volume of international transfers of major arms in 2016–20 was United States, Russia, France, 0.5 per cent lower than in 2011–15 and 12 per cent higher than in 2006–10 Germany and China. Together, they accounted for 76 per cent of (see figure 1).1 The five largest arms exporters in 2016–20 were the United all exports of major arms in States, Russia, France, Germany and China (see table 1). The five largest 2016–20. arms importers were Saudi Arabia, India, Egypt, Australia and China w In 2016–20 US arms exports (see table 2). Between 2011–15 and 2016–20 there were increases in arms accounted for 37 per cent of the transfers to the Middle East (25 per cent) and to Europe (12 per cent), while global total and were 15 per cent there were decreases in the transfers to Africa (–13 per cent), the Americas higher than in 2011–15. (–43 per cent), and Asia and Oceania (–8.3 per cent). w Russian arms exports From 15 March 2021 SIPRI’s open-access Arms Transfers Database decreased by 22 per cent includes updated data on transfers of major arms for 1950–2020, which between 2011–15 and 2016–20.
    [Show full text]
  • The Night Operation on the Passchendaele Ridge, 2Nd December 1917
    Centre for First World War Studies A Moonlight Massacre: The Night Operation on the Passchendaele Ridge, 2nd December 1917 by Michael Stephen LoCicero Thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of History and Cultures College of Arts & Law June 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The Third Battle of Ypres was officially terminated by Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig with the opening of the Battle of Cambrai on 20 November 1917. Nevertheless, a comparatively unknown set-piece attack – the only large-scale night operation carried out on the Flanders front during the campaign – was launched twelve days later on 2 December. This thesis, a necessary corrective to published campaign narratives of what has become popularly known as „Passchendaele‟, examines the course of events from the mid-November decision to sanction further offensive activity in the vicinity of Passchendaele village to the barren operational outcome that forced British GHQ to halt the attack within ten hours of Zero. A litany of unfortunate decisions and circumstances contributed to the profitless result.
    [Show full text]
  • Tm 9-3305 Technical Manual Principles of Artillery Weapons Headquarters
    Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com TM 9-3305 TECHNICAL MANUAL PRINCIPLES OF ARTILLERY WEAPONS HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 4 MAY 1981 Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com *TM 9-3305 Technical Manual HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY No. 9-3305 Washington, DC, 4 May 1981 PRINCIPLES OF ARTILLERY WEAPONS REPORTING ERRORS AND RECOMMENDING IMPROVEMENTS You can help improve this manual. If you find any mistakes or if you know of a way to improve the procedures, please let us know. Mail your letter, DA Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms), or DA Form 2028-2, located in the back of this manual, direct to: Commander, US Army Armament Materiel Readiness Command, ATTN: DRSAR-MAS, Rock Island, IL 61299. A reply will be furnished to you. Para Page PART ONE. GENERAL CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1-1 1-1 2. HISTORY OF DEVELOPMENT Section I. General ....................................................................................................................... 2-1 2-1 II. Development of United States Cannon Artillery......................................................... 2-8 2-5 III. Development of Rockets and Guided Missiles ......................................................... 2-11 2-21 CHAPTER 3. CLASSIFICATION OF CURRENT FIELD ARTILLERY WEAPONS Section I. General ....................................................................................................................... 3-1 3-1
    [Show full text]
  • Shipwreck Cannons Gwen Wright
    Season 6, Episode 9: Shipwreck Cannons Gwen Wright: Our first story investigates a maritime mystery washed up on an Oregon beach. 1846: tensions between the U.S. and Britain are approaching a boiling point. All eyes are focused on the disputed border between the U.S. and the British colonial territory of Canada. At stake is ownership of the enormous riches of some 300,000 square miles of the Pacific Northwest. The U.S. needs reconnaissance, and dispatches an armed naval vessel – the USS Shark . But that September disaster strikes; the Shark wrecks and sinks at the treacherous mouth of the Columbia River. More than a century and a half later, fourteen-year-old Miranda Petrone, from Tualatin, Oregon, thinks she may have found a piece of this historic ship. Miranda: Me and my dad were walking along the beach. And I saw this big thing with rust. And I’m like, hey dad, come here. Gwen: I’m Gwen Wright, nice to meet you. So I heard you found something pretty interesting around here. Miranda: Yeah. Gwen: What was it? Miranda: We found a cannon. Gwen: Now, are you sure it was a cannon? Miranda: Well, not at first. Me and my dad were walking along the beach. Then there was this big black rocky thing so I went up a little closer and eventually saw rust. I thought, rocks aren't supposed to have rust. And so, I called my dad over. He came and checked it out. He's like, huh, maybe it's a cannon. He was just joking though.
    [Show full text]
  • American Armies and Battlefields in Europe
    Chapter v1 THE AMERICAN BATTLEFIELDS NORTH OF PARIS chapter gives brief accounts of areas and to all of the American ceme- all American fighting whi ch oc- teries and monuments. This route is Thiscurred on the battle front north of recommended for those who desire to Paris and complete information concern- make an extended automobile tour in the ing the American military cemeteries and region. Starting from Paris, it can be monuments in that general region. The completely covered in four days, allowing military operations which are treated are plenty of time to stop on the way. those of the American lst, 27th, 30th, The accounts of the different operations 33d, 37th, 80th and 91st Divisions and and the descriptions of the American the 6th and 11 th Engineer Regiments. cemeteries and monuments are given in Because of the great distances apart of the order they are reached when following So uthern Encr ance to cb e St. Quentin Can al Tunnel, Near Bellicourc, October 1, 1918 the areas where this fighting occurred no the suggested route. For tbis reason they itinerary is given. Every operation is do not appear in chronological order. described, however, by a brief account Many American units otber tban those illustrated by a sketch. The account and mentioned in this chapter, sucb as avia- sketch together give sufficient information tion, tank, medical, engineer and infantry, to enable the tourist to plan a trip through served behind this part of the front. Their any particular American combat area. services have not been recorded, however, The general map on the next page as the space limitations of tbis chapter indicates a route wbich takes the tourist required that it be limited to those Amer- either int o or cl ose to all of tbese combat ican organizations which actually engaged (371) 372 THE AMERICAN B ATTLEFIELD S NO R TH O F PARIS Suggested Tour of American Battlefields North of Paris __ Miles Ghent ( î 37th and 91st Divisions, Ypres-Lys '"offensive, October 30-November 11, 1918 \ ( N \ 1 80th Division, Somme 1918 Albert 33d Division.
    [Show full text]
  • The Utilization of Artillery and Mortars As Infantry Support Weapons in the Chaco War
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 6-1965 The Utilization of Artillery and Mortars as Infantry Support Weapons in the Chaco War Charles John Goodall Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Goodall, Charles John, "The Utilization of Artillery and Mortars as Infantry Support Weapons in the Chaco War" (1965). Master's Theses. 3907. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3907 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE UTILIZATION OF ARTILLERY AND MORTARS AS INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS IN THE CHACO WAR by Charles John Goodall A thesis presented to the Faculty of the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Arts Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan June, 1965 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his appreciation for the co-operation of the following agencies and research facilities in gathering materials and providing technical advice in the production of this thesis: The University of Texas Library, Austin, Texas. The University of North Carolina Library, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. The University of Florida Library, Gainesville, Florida. Duke University Library, Durham, North Carolina. The University of California Library, Los Angeles, California The United States Army War College, Ft. Leavenworth, Kansas. The United States Army Ordnance School, Ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore Defense Artillery Force
    49 PUEiFACE * This document is one of a series prepared under instructions from the Supreme Cormmander for the Allied Powers to the Japanese Governrien-t (SCAPIN No. 126, 12 Oct 19'45). The series covers not only the operations of the Japanese armed forces during World War- II but also their operations in China and M4anchuria which preceded the world conflict. The original studies were written by former officers of the Japanese Army and Navy under the supervision of the Historical Rrecords Section of the First (Army) and Second (Navy) Demobilization Bureaus of the Japanese Govern aent. The manuscripts were translated by the ilitary Intelligence Service Group, G2, Headcuarters, Far East Commiiand. 1 tensive editing has ,been ac- colmplished by the Foreign Iistories Division of the Office of the Military History Officer, Headquarters, United States Aynj Japan. Monograph No. 68 is a report made 'by Lt Col. Tadataka Nu na- guchi of Army Technical: Ieadquarters and aij. Katsuji Akiyana of the Army Heavy Artillery.. School of an' inspection tour of Singapore and Java between Mj4arch and May 1;42. It covers the condition of the fortresses and weapons on those islands; an estimate of the nixiiber of weapons, since at that time a complete count had not been accomplished, and recowmendations in regard to their use and dis- posal. As the oasic manuscript fromil which this st~idy was prepared was particularly poor and filled. with. obvious errors, Lti. Col. NJumagu- chi, now a civilian in Tokyo, and Maj . Akiyama, now a colonel with the Japanese Self lDefense Force, have been interviewed on.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Building a Rattan Weapon for SCA Youth Combat by Mistress Arianna of Wynthrope Baronial Youth Combat Marshall, Barony-Marche O
    Building a Rattan Weapon for SCA Youth Combat By Mistress Arianna of Wynthrope Baronial Youth Combat Marshall, Barony-Marche of the Debatable Lands This article demonstrates one way to make rattan weapons for SCA Youth Combat Division 2 and 3 fighters. It is not the only way, but weapons made this way have passed inspection by Kingdom and Society level Youth Combat Marshals and proven to be durable and functional. You will need the following supplies and equipment: • A piece of rattan between ¾” and 1” in diameter and appropriate in length for the weapon you wish to make. Weapon length should be proportional to the fighter. Great weapons have the following maximum length limitations: • Spear - 7.5’ • Pole-arms - 6’ - The striking edge shall not exceed 1/3 of the weapons total length. • Great sword - 6’ - No more than 18" haft (hilt). • 1” inner diameter pipe foam that is at least 3/8” thick and long enough for the desired weapon • Closed cell camp foam, any thickness from ¼” to ¾” • A roll of duct tape • A roll of electrical tape in a contrasting color to the duct tape • Scissors • A utility knife • For single-handed weapons, a shoelace or other cord for a lanyard • A ruler 1 STEP 1 – Making sure your rattan is properly sized Using a ruler, verify that your rattan is at least ¾” and no more than 1” in diameter. If it is too large, use a plane or draw knife to shave it down, then sand the entire shaft. If it is less than ¾” in diameter, do not use that piece of rattan.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Arms-Individual Weapons
    290 Small Arms–Individual Weapons INVESTMENT COMPONENT Modernization thousand M14 EBRs were assembled be mounted on the shotgun. The bolt • 1QFY09: Materiel release and full- at TACOM Lifecycle Management handle is mountable on either side for rate production decision Recapitalization Command at Rock Island Arsenal in ambidextrous handling. • 3QFY09: First unit equipped response to Operational Need Statements M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun Maintenance requesting a longer range capability. The MASS enables Soldiers to transition System: The upgraded weapons are currently in between lethal and less-than-lethal fires • 4QFY09: Limited user test and MISSION service with select Army units. and adds the capability of a separate evaluation with MP units Enables warfighters and small units to shotgun without carrying a second • 2QFY10: Low-rate initial production engage targets with lethal fire to defeat The M320 Grenade Launcher is the weapon. Additional features include a approved or deter adversaries. replacement to all M203 series grenade box magazine, flip-up sights, and an • 4QFY10: First article testing launchers on M16 Rifles and M4 extendable stand-off device for door complete DESCRIPTION Carbines. A modular system, it attaches breaching. The M4 Carbine replaces the M16 series under the barrel of the rifle or carbine PROJECTED ACTIVITIES Rifles in all Brigade Combat Teams, and can convert to a stand-alone weapon. SYSTEM INTERDEPENDENCIES M4 Carbine: Division Headquarters, and other The M320 improves on current grenade None • Continue: M4 production, deliveries, selected units. It is 1.4 pounds lighter launchers with an integral day/night and fielding and more portable than the M16 series of sighting system and improved safety PROGRAM STATUS M14 EBR: rifles.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development and Design of Bronze Ordnance, Sixteenth
    The Development and Design of Bronze Ordnance, Sixteenth through Nineteenth Centuries by Chuck Meide The College of William & Mary November 2002 The Development and Design of Bronze Ordnance, Sixteenth through Nineteenth Centuries Introduction 1 Evolution, 16th-19th Centuries 1 Typology 1 Bronze vs. Iron 8 Decline of Bronze Ordnance 10 Morphology 13 Nomenclature 13 Decoration 25 Composition 30 Conclusion 31 References 33 Introduction “Ordnance is the most accurate and acceptable generic term which embraces all those weapons of war which use an explosive charge to propel a missile in the direction of the enemy, and which are larger than those which can be used as personal arms” (Hughes 1969: 1). The technical development and unreserved application of cannon (a term which in its modern sense encompasses all of the types mentioned below) played a key role in European expansion and colonial hegemony (cf. Cipolla 1965). Ordnance remains, therefore, are of great interest to archaeologists studying this process, or that of technological change in general. In addition, ordnance—and especially bronze as opposed to iron pieces—usually proves the most diagnostic artifacts found on a shipwreck or military site. This study is an overview of the history of the development, design, and manufacture of bronze muzzle-loading ordnance, which were widely used by the world’s military forces from the 16th to mid-19th centuries. Discussion is limited for the most part to guns (what are usually termed cannon), but also to mortars, howitzers, and to a lesser degree types such as the carronade and swivel gun. Evolution, 16th-19th Centuries Typology Cannon of the 16th century inherited a medieval system of naming and classification.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinker Emporium Tinker Emporium Vol. Firearms Vol. 7
    Tinker Emporium Vol. 7 Firearms Introduction : This file contains ten homebrew firearms (based on real world) , each presented with a unique description and a colored picture. Separate pictures in better resolution are included in the download for sake of creating handouts, etc. by Revlis M. Template Created by William Tian DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D& D, Wizards of the Coast, Forgotten Realms, the dragon ampersand, Player’s Handbook, Monster Manual, Dungeon Master’s Guide, D&D Adventurers League, all other Wizards of the Coast product names, and their respective logos are trademarks of Wizards of the Co ast in the USA and other countries. All characters and their distinctive likenesses are property of Wizards of the Coast. This material is protected under the copyright laws of the United States of America. Any re production or unauthorized use of the mater ial or artwork contained herein is prohibited without the express written permission of Wizards of the Coast. ©2018 Wizards of the Coast LLC, PO Box 707, Renton, WA 98057 -0707, USA. Manufactured by Hasbro SA, Rue Emile-Boéchat 31, 2800 Delémont, CH. Represented by Hasbro Europe, 4 SampleThe Square, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB11 1ET, file Not for resale. Permission granted to print or photocopy this document for personal use only . T.E. Firearms 1 Firearms Fire L ance Introduction and Points of Interest Firearm, 5 lb, Two-handed, (2d4) Bludgeoning, Ranged (15/30), Reload, Blaze Rod What are Firearms in D&D Firearms by definition are barreled ranged weapons that inflict damage by launching projectiles. In the world of D&D the firearms are created with the use of rare metals and alchemical discoveries.
    [Show full text]