DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 31/Tuesday, February 17, 1998

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 31/Tuesday, February 17, 1998 7764 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 31 / Tuesday, February 17, 1998 / Notices Agency: Corporation for National and Wage Committee, 4000 Defense and correspondence during the Community Service. Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301±4000. preparation of the EA will be considered Title: Applicant Medical Prescreening Dated: February 10, 1998. in preparation of the EIS, as will Form. L.M. Bynum, comments received by the Air Force OMB Number: 3045±0025. during this scoping period. To ensure Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Agency Number: None. Officer, Department of Defense. the Air Force has sufficient time to Affected Public: 18±24 year old [FR Doc. 98±3784 Filed 2±13±98; 8:45 am] consider public input in the preparation AmeriCorps*NCCC applicants. of the Draft EIS, comments should be BILLING CODE 5000±04±M Total Respondents: Approximately submitted to the address below by 2,500. March 20, 1998: Frequency: One time per selected DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HQ AFCEE/ECR applicant. ATTN: Ms. Julia Cantrell, 3207 North Average Time Per Response: .5 hours Department of the Air Force Road, Brooks Air Force Base, TX Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1,250 78235±5363 hours. Notice of Intent To Prepare Barbara A. Carmichael, Environmental Impact Statement on Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): 0. Alternate Air Force Federal Register Liaison Total Burden Cost (operating/ the Proposal to Release Federal Funds Officer. to the University of New Mexico to maintenance): 0. [FR Doc. 98±3906 Filed 2±13±98; 8:45 am] Construct Enchanted Skies Park and Comments submitted in response to BILLING CODE 3910±01±P this notice will be summarized and/or Observatory, Near Grants, NM included in the request for Office of The United States Air Force (Air Management and Budget approval of the Force) will prepare an Environmental DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE information collection request; they will Impact Statement (EIS) to assess the also become a matter of public record. potential environmental impacts of the Department of the Air Force Dated: February 10, 1998. Air Force's decision to issue Department Air Force Institute of Technology Kenneth L. Klothen, of Defense (DoD) grant funds to the Subcommittee of the Air University General Counsel. University of New Mexico to construct Board of Visitors; Notice of Meeting [FR Doc. 98±3891 Filed 2±13±98; 8:45 am] an astronomical observatory on Horace BILLING CODE 6050±28±P Mesa, near Grants. The Air Force The Air Force Institute of Technology initiated an Environmental Assessment Subcommittee of the Air University (EA) in May 1997 to analyze this Board of Visitors will hold an open proposal. Preliminary results from the meeting on March 15±17, 1998, with the DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EA indicated the potential for first business session beginning at 8:30 Office of the Secretary of Defense significant impacts to cultural resources. a.m. in the Commandant's Conference In accordance with the National Room, Building 125, Wright-Patterson Department of Defense Wage Environmental Policy Act, the Air Force Air Force Base (AFB), Ohio (5 seats Committee; Notice of Closed Meetings will continue the analysis of this available). proposal through the preparation of an The purpose of the meeting is to give Pursuant to the provisions of section EIS. The EIS will be used by the Air the board an opportunity to review Air 10 of Public Law 92±463, the Federal Force in considering whether, and Force Institute of Technology's Advisory Committee Act, notice is under what conditions, to approve the educational programs and to present to hereby given that closed meetings of the release of federal funds to construct the the Commandant a report of their Department of Defense Wage Committee observatory on Horace Mesa and to findings and recommendations will be held on March 3, 1998; March document the Air Force's decision in a concerning these programs. 10, 1998; March 17, 1998; March 24, Record of Decision. For further information on this 1998; and March 31, 1998, at 10:00 a.m. The University of New Mexico has meeting, contact Ms. Beverly Houtz, in Room A105, The Nash Building, 1400 proposed to use the grant funds to build Directorate of Plans and Operations, Air Key Boulevard, Rosslyn, Virginia. the Enchanted Skies Park and Force Institute of Technology, Wright- Under the provisions of section 10(d) Observatory near Grants, NM. This Patterson AFB, Ohio, 45433±7765 (937) of Public Law 92±463, the Department proposal involves the construction and 255±5760. of Defense has determined that the operation of an astronomical research Barbara A. Carmichael, meetings meet the criteria to close site with a publicly accessible park that Alternate Air Force Federal Register Liaison meetings to the public because the includes educational opportunities and Officer. matters to be considered are related to amateur viewing facilities. The project [FR Doc. 98±3907 Filed 2±13±98; 8:45 am] internal rules and practices of the would consist of a Visitor's Center, BILLING CODE 3910±01±P Department of Defense and the detailed Technical Center and amateur viewing wage data to be considered were area. The building and structures would obtained from officials of private occupy approximately 250 acres of land DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE establishments with a guarantee that the on Horace Mesa with interconnected data will be held in confidence. transportation corridors for hiking, Department of the Navy However, members of the public who walking, delivery/maintenance, and may wish to do so are invited to submit tram/trolley traffic. Improvements to Record of Decision for the Installation material in writing to the chairman state owned access roads would also be and Operation of a Relocatable Over concerning matters believed to be required. the Horizon Radar (ROTHR) System in deserving of the Committee's attention. The scoping period for the Enchanted Puerto Rico Additional information concerning Skies Park and Observatory will extend AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD. the meetings may be obtained by writing through March 20, 1998. Written and ACTION: Notice of record of decision. to the Chairman, Department of Defense oral comments received from meetings Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 31 / Tuesday, February 17, 1998 / Notices 7765 SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared in two versions, English and announces its decision to install and for Construction and Operation of a Spanish, and distributed to over 200 operate a ROTHR System in Puerto ROTHR, Puerto Rico was published in government agencies, groups, and Rico. the Federal Register on May 25, 1994. individuals. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. That notice described briefly the A public hearing was held on March Linda Blount, Atlantic Division Naval proposed action, requirements for a 15, 1997 in Juana Diaz, with HeÂctor Facilities Engineering Command (Code transmitter site and a receiver site, and Russe Martinez, Esq., President of the 2032LB), 1510 Gilbert Street, Norfolk, alternative site locations identified for Puerto Rico EQB, serving as Hearing VA 23511±2699, telephone (757) 322± the transmitter on Vieques (Playa Officer. During the public hearing forty 4892. Grande, Camp Garcia Airfield, and people spoke. The public comment period was open for the receipt of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of Camp Garcia East) and for the receiver in southwest Puerto Rico (Lajas A and comments until March 31, 1997. Forty- the entire Record of Decision is nine letters from agencies, provided as follows: Lajas B). Public scoping meetings were announced in English and Spanish in organizations, and individual concerned The Department of the Navy (Navy), citizens were received by the Navy pursuant to Section 102 (2) (c) of the local newspapers and in direct mailouts. Following these notifications, two pertaining to the ROTHR project. National Environmental Policy Act of Issues raised at the public hearings 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq., scoping meetings were held as follows: • June 9, 1994 from 7:30 pm to 9:30 and submitted in writing were and the regulations of the Council on pm at the Community Center in La addressed in a Final EIS (FEIS). The Environmental Quality (CEQ) that Parguera, Lajas, PR; and FEIS was filed with EPA on September implement NEPA procedures, 40 CFR • June 11, 1994 from 10:30 am to 1:00 19, 1997 and a Notice of Availability Parts 1500±1508, hereby announces its pm at the Municipal Assembly Hall in was published in the Federal Register decision to install and operate a ROTHR Vieques, PR. on September 26, 1997. The document System in Puerto Rico. A total of ten individuals provided was prepared in two versions, English The ROTHR system is a high comments at the scoping meetings and and Spanish, and distributed to over frequency radar that provides over-the- three letters were received. 200 government agencies, groups, and horizon detection and tracking of On July 18, 1995, the Draft individuals. The public comment period aircraft over a wide geographic area. Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was open for the receipt of new Each complete ROTHR system is for the ROTHR project was issued, and comments until October 27, 1997. A composed of three major subsystems: on July 24, 1995 a Notice of Availability total of eight written comments were the transmitter, receiver, and operation was published in the Federal Register. received on the FEIS. control center (OCC). The transmitter The document was prepared in two Alternatives will be installed at a site on the versions, English and Spanish, and southwestern coast of Vieques, Puerto distributed to 118 parties including NEPA requires the Navy to evaluate a Rico, north of the Laguna Playa Grande. government agencies, groups, and reasonable range of alternatives. The receiver will be installed at a site individuals.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Department of Defense Office of the Secretary
    Monday, May 16, 2005 Part LXII Department of Defense Office of the Secretary Base Closures and Realignments (BRAC); Notice VerDate jul<14>2003 10:07 May 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\16MYN2.SGM 16MYN2 28030 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 93 / Monday, May 16, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Headquarters U.S. Army Forces Budget/Funding, Contracting, Command (FORSCOM), and the Cataloging, Requisition Processing, Office of the Secretary Headquarters U.S. Army Reserve Customer Services, Item Management, Command (USARC) to Pope Air Force Stock Control, Weapon System Base Closures and Realignments Base, NC. Relocate the Headquarters 3rd Secondary Item Support, Requirements (BRAC) U.S. Army to Shaw Air Force Base, SC. Determination, Integrated Materiel AGENCY: Department of Defense. Relocate the Installation Management Management Technical Support ACTION: Notice of Recommended Base Agency Southeastern Region Inventory Control Point functions for Closures and Realignments. Headquarters and the U.S. Army Consumable Items to Defense Supply Network Enterprise Technology Center Columbus, OH, and reestablish SUMMARY: The Secretary of Defense is Command (NETCOM) Southeastern them as Defense Logistics Agency authorized to recommend military Region Headquarters to Fort Eustis, VA. Inventory Control Point functions; installations inside the United States for Relocate the Army Contracting Agency relocate the procurement management closure and realignment in accordance Southern Region Headquarters to Fort and related support functions for Depot with Section 2914(a) of the Defense Base Sam Houston. Level Reparables to Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, and designate them as Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, as Operational Army (IGPBS) amended (Pub.
    [Show full text]
  • Expressions of Legislative Sentiment Recognizing
    MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from electronic originals (may include minor formatting differences from printed original) Senate Legislative Record One Hundred and Twenty-Sixth Legislature State of Maine Daily Edition First Regular Session December 5, 2012 - July 9, 2013 First Special Session August 29, 2013 Second Regular Session January 8, 2014 - May 1, 2014 First Confirmation Session July 31, 2014 Second Confirmation Session September 30, 2014 pages 1 - 2435 SENATE LEGISLATIVE RECORD Senate Legislative Sentiment Appendix Cheryl DiCara, of Brunswick, on her retirement from the extend our appreciation to Mr. Seitzinger for his commitment to Department of Health and Human Services after 29 years of the citizens of Augusta and congratulate him on his receiving this service. During her career at the department, Ms. DiCara award; (SLS 7) provided direction and leadership for state initiatives concerning The Family Violence Project, of Augusta, which is the the prevention of injury and suicide. She helped to establish recipient of the 2012 Kennebec Valley Chamber of Commerce Maine as a national leader in the effort to prevent youth suicide Community Service Award. The Family Violence Project provides and has been fundamental in uniting public and private entities to support and services for survivors of domestic violence in assist in this important work. We send our appreciation to Ms. Kennebec County and Somerset County. Under the leadership of DiCara for her dedicated service and commitment to and Deborah Shephard, the Family Violence Project each year compassion for the people of Maine, and we extend our handles 4,000 calls and nearly 3,000 face to face visits with congratulations and best wishes to her on her retirement; (SLS 1) victims at its 3 outreach offices and provides 5,000 nights of Wild Oats Bakery and Cafe, of Brunswick, on its being safety for victims at its shelters.
    [Show full text]
  • US Army Reserve-Puerto Rico 1St MSC Gazette
    1st Mission Support Command - U. S. Army Reserve-Puerto Rico 1st MSC Gazette Vol. No. 6 Issue 6 SUMMER 2015 “Ready, Resilient, Relevant” ON THE COVER: 1ST MSC MORTUARY AFFAIRS UNITS PREPARE TO RESPOND FUTURE LEADERS 10-11 GRADUATE WLC 271st HRC DETACHMENT 4-5 DEPLOYS TO THE MIDDLE EAST www.facebook.com/1stmsc 1st Mission Support Command - U. S. Army Reserve-Puerto Rico 1st MSC Gazette Vol. No. 6 Issue 6 “Ready, Resilient, 1st MSC Gazette Contents Relevant!” Brig. Gen. José R. Burgos Commander Page Page Col. Irene M. Zoppi Deputy Commander 271st Deployment Annual Training 4-5 18-19 Maj. Ruth Castro Pubblic Affair Officer Sgt. 1st Class Lymari Sanchez Page Page Public Affairs NCOIC 6-7 Family Events 20-21 Change of Command The 1st MSC Gazette is an authorized publication printed IAW AR-360-1 in the interest of Soldiers, civilians and Families Page of the 1st MSC. Opinions expressed are those of the 8-9 Promotion / Retirement Ceremonies individuals and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U. S. government. Department of the Army or its agencies. All photos are property of the U.S. Army, Page unless otherwise credited. 1st MSC Gazette is published by the 1st 10-11 Future Leaders G raduate MSC Headquarters located at 353 Wilson Road, Fort Buchanan, PR 00934-4608 E-mail submission to the 1st MSC Public Affairs Officer Page at 12-13 Armed Forces Day FIND US AT: [email protected] 1st MSC Phone Numbers Commander 787-707-4928 Page 1stmsc Deputy Commander 787-707-4944 / Safety Specialist 787-707-4182 Personnel 787-707-4164 14-15 398th FI Det.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES Annette M
    1964 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD -HOUSE 5529 In removing it, he dramatized, to my mind, can. They fought with an unrelenting cour­ it should also end there. They voted in the the coming of age of both this country and age in the economic, political, and mmtary United States with an eye to the effect on the Irish in it. He was the symbol of the battles of the country. They would not give the freedom of Ireland, and in so doing they immigrant--a symbol not exclusively reserved an inch. They were despised and rejected broadened the scope of American polltical for the Irish. and discriminated against, but they did not thinking. I think that Leonard Patrick O'Connor make this an occasion for wa111ng, but only Wibberley in a summation of his book, "The fought the harder. "The slums did not hold them. The mines Coming of the Green," tells us the Irish con­ "They did not desert their faith, once so did not break them. They were not lost tribution not only to America, but to the unpopular, in order to gain acceptance. Nor building roads and canals in the wilderness. world: did they forget their homeland, for though They were not defeated at the foot of Marye's "The Irish immigrants did what every for­ they believed that freedom began with the Heights. eign group must do to win the name Ameri- American coastline, they saw no reason why "It was a grand battle, indeed." H.R. 8280. An act for the relief of Mrs. jected by the House last week twists HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Annette M.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 42/Thursday, March 3, 2016
    11212 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2016 / Notices TABLE 2—CONCENTRATION LIMITS OF CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS THAT ARE HAZARDOUS AT LESS THAN 0.001 Mg/L— Continued Concentration Concentration Health based limit at the reduction Chemical constituent Waste code limit wellhead factor (mg/L) (mg/L) ) (Note 2) (C/C0 2-Methylpyridine ............................................. U191 ............................................................... 2.0 × 10¥3 1,000 2.0 × 10¥6 3-Methylpyridine ............................................. Note 2 ............................................................. 1.0 × 10¥6 1,000 1.0 × 10¥9 Nickel .............................................................. F006 ............................................................... 0.001 100 1.0 × 10¥5 Nicotinonitrile .................................................. Note 2 ............................................................. 6.0 × 10¥6 6,000 1.0 × 10¥9 Nitrilotiracetonitrile .......................................... Note 2 ............................................................. 1.0 × 10¥6 1,000 1.0 × 10¥9 Nitrobenzene .................................................. U169 ............................................................... 1.8 × 10¥2 100 1.8 × 10¥4 Oleic acid ........................................................ Note 2 ............................................................. 1.0 × 10¥6 1,000 1.0 × 10¥9 Oleoylsarconsinate ......................................... Note 2 ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brac Commission Findings and Recommendations Department of the Army
    BRAC COMMISSION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Note: The recommendations appear in this report in the exact same order, and using the exact same titles, as they appeared in the Department of Defense report submitted May 13, 2005. Paragraphs titled “Secretary of Defense Recommendations,” and “Secretary of Defense Justification” are from the May 13, 2005, report submitted by the Secretary to the BRAC Commission. Where bases not originally listed by DoD have been “added” by the Commission, they will appear at the end of the relevant Report section. FORT WAINWRIGHT, ALASKA RECOMMENDATION # 1 (ARMY 5) ONE-TIME COST: $0.05M ANNUAL RECURRING COSTS/(SAVINGS): ($0.05M) 20-YEAR NET PRESENT VALUE: ($0.7M) PAYBACK PERIOD: 2 YEARS SECRETARY OF DEFENSE RECOMMENDATION Realign Fort Wainwright, AK, by relocating the Cold Regions Test Center (CRTC) headquarters from Fort Wainwright, AK, to Fort Greely, AK. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE JUSTIFICATION This recommendation relocates CRTC headquarters to Fort Greely to improve efficiency of operations and personnel safety. Sufficient capacity exists at Fort Greely. This would not affect Force Structure. This recommendation relocates headquarters closer to the CRTC’s test mission execution on the Bolio Lake Range Complex. This complex, although realigned under Fort Wainwright in BRAC 95, is only 10 miles south of Fort Greely but 100 miles from Fort Wainwright’s cantonment area. This action would improve interoperability and reduce costs by permitting personnel to live closer to their primary work site, thus avoiding a 200-mile round trip between quarters and work sites. It also decreases the risks associated with the required year-round travel in extreme weather conditions and results in more efficient and cost effective monitoring and control of arctic testing of transformational systems.
    [Show full text]
  • 166 Public Law 86-500-.June 8, 1960 [74 Stat
    166 PUBLIC LAW 86-500-.JUNE 8, 1960 [74 STAT. Public Law 86-500 June 8. 1960 AN ACT [H» R. 10777] To authorize certain construction at military installation!^, and for other pnriwses. He it enacted hy the Hemite and House of Representatives of the 8tfiction^'Acf°^ I'raited States of America in Congress assemoJed, I960. TITLE I ''^^^* SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con- \'erting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, including site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, and equip­ ment, for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES I'ECHNICAL SERVICES FACILITIES (Ordnance Corps) Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: Training facilities, medical facilities, and utilities, $6,221,000. Benicia Arsenal, California: Utilities, $337,000. Blue Grass Ordnance Depot, Kentucky: Utilities and ground improvements, $353,000. Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey: Research, development, and test facilities, $850,000. Pueblo Ordnance Depot, Colorado: Operational facilities, $369,000. Redstone Arsenal, Alabama: Community facilities and utilities, $1,000,000. Umatilla Ordnance Depot, Oregon: Utilities and ground improve­ ments, $319,000. Watertow^n Arsenal, Massachusetts: Research, development, and test facilities, $1,849,000. White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico: Operational facilities and utilities, $1,2'33,000. (Quartermaster Corps) Fort Lee, Virginia: Administrative facilities and utilities, $577,000. Atlanta General Depot, Georgia: Maintenance facilities, $365,000. New Cumberland General Depot, Pennsylvania: Operational facili­ ties, $89,000. Richmond Quartermaster Depot, Virginia: Administrative facili­ ties, $478,000. Sharpe General Depot, California: Maintenance facilities, $218,000. (Chemical Corps) Army Chemical Center, Maryland: Operational facilities and com­ munity facilities, $843,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Construction, Family Housing, and Base Realignment and Closure Program
    CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS (C-1) Department of Defense Budget Fiscal Year 2021 Feb 2020 Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) Preface The C-1 is provided annually to the DoD oversight committees of the Congress coincident with the transmittal of the President's Budget. This document is also provided to Office of Assistance Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs) for use by non-DoD activities, and is available to the public on the Internet at http://comptroller.defense.gov/ Office of the Under Secretary Defense (Comptroller) Department of Defense Preparation of the C-1 cost the Department of Defense a total of approximately $38,000 in FY 2020. i UNCLASSIFIED THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK UNCLASSIFIED TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary State and Country Listing Page FY 2019 Summary by Appropriation………......…………...........................SUMMARY 1-3 Summary by Location and Purpose................................................ 4-13 Summary by State and Country...................................................... 14-15 Summary by State and Country by Component............................. 16-21 FY 2020 Summary by Appropriation………......………............................... 22-24 Summary by Location and Purpose................................................ 25-34 Summary by State and Country...................................................... 35-36 Summary by State and Country by Component............................. 37-41 FY 2021 Summary by Appropriation………......………............................... 42-43 Summary by Location and Purpose...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Las Bases E Instalaciones Militares De Estados Unidos
    LAS BASES E INSTALACIONES MILITARES DE ESTADOS UNIDOS EN PUERTO RICO Y SU IMPACTO EN LA SOCIEDAD PUERTORRIQUEÑA Héctor R. Feliciano Ramos Puerto Rico fue descubierto por Cristóbal Colón durante su segundo viaje a América en 1493. Sin embargo, fue necesario esperar 15 años ya que fue en 1508-1509 cuando se inició la colonización española por Juan Ponce de León, quien, por sus características estratégicas, le dio el nombre de Puerto Rico a la que hoy se conoce como Bahía de San Juan. La presencia española duró hasta 1898 cuando Estados Unidos invadió el país como parte de las operaciones de la Guerra Hispano-Cubana-Estadounidense. En esos 390 años España convirtió a Puerto Rico en una de las principales piezas defensivas de su imperio americano en el Caribe. Evidencia de ello son las grandes fortificaciones militares y las murallas del viejo San Juan. El 25 de julio de 1898 —en medio de la Guerra Hispano-Americana— se inició la invasión estadounidense de Puerto Rico y con muy poca resistencia la operación militar concluyó el 12 de agosto de ese año con un triunfo arrollador del ejército de Estados Unidos1. La rapidez de las acciones militares y la ocupación del país, la tecnología y los usos y costumbres que los estadounidenses introdujeron en Puerto Rico deslumbraron a los puertorriqueños de aquella época2. Con la ocupación y el triunfo militar norteamericano de 1898, además de la milicia y la marina, hacía Puerto Rico se movilizó un ejército de diversos sectores de los Estados Unidos que vieron al país caribeño como una oportunidad de adelantar sus intereses particulares.
    [Show full text]
  • “Victory Starts Here” Published in the Interest of the 108Th Training
    THE “Victory Starts Here” Published in the interest of the 108th Training Command • Vol 35.1 Spring 2011 THE GRIFFON • Spring 2011 • 3 FFromrom thethe CommandingCommanding GGeneral...eneral... Happy New Year by the end of 2011. In Afghanistan, DoD and the Military Services have sionals should read. the decision of the way ahead will asked for 60 days for a deliberate There are a number of changes occur this summer on the future of planning process to implement. that that affect us in the training forces there. It will be conditions DoD has also asked the Army to re- community. Command Sgt. Maj. based. This will have an impact on duce its current force structure by Payne addresses a few of these in the NATO Training Mission and 49,000 soldiers in the coming years his article. Consolidation of the forces 108th have on the ground on base of 569,400. The Army’s end Drill Sergeant School at Ft. Jack- (Task Force Scorpion). These are strength is currently at its highest son, S.C., reduced Regional Training the trainers for the Afghan National level since the early 1990’s. Center missions, the ANA mission Army and National Police in the Ka- With the Long War on Terror that I mentioned above and all the bul Military Training Center, Afghan now in its ninth year, the Army as a myriad of changes that are occur- Defense University, Branch Schools, profession is pausing to take a hard ring in the Initial Military Training and Regional Training Centers. look at itself to refl ect on where world are just a few.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Mexico
    12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1819 20 21 22 23 24 25 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : United States Army )RUW/HDYHQZRUWK ' 1*76(WKDQ$OOHQ5DQJH& %UDGOH\,$3 ' *ULVVRP$5%««««««««««««««« ' 0RRG\$)%««««««««««««««««««« * 7UDYLV6\VWHP$QQH[( 'DQGDQ*XDP 1$93+,%$6(/LWWOH&UHHN ( 161RUIRON ( ( : : : : : : $EHUGHHQ3URYLQJ*URXQG ' )RUW/HH ( 17&DQG)RUW,UZLQ ) %UDQG\ZLQH*OREHFRP$QQH[ ( *XOISRUW%LOR[L5HJLRQDO$LUSRUW«««««««««« * 0RXQWDLQ+RPH$)%««««««««««««««« & 7UXD[$1*% & 'L[LH7DUJHW5DQJH + 1$93+,%$6(6HDO6LGH* 163HDUO+DUERU+DZDLL $QQLVWRQ$UP\'HSRW ) )RUW/HRQDUG:RRG ( 2UG0LOLWDU\&RPPXQLW\ ( %URRNV$)% + +DDUS5HVHDUFK6WDWLRQ«««««««««««« $ODVND 0XNLOWHR'HIHQVH)XHO6XSSRUW3RLQW«««««««« % 7XFVRQ,$3* (OL]DEHWK5LYHU&KDQQHO( 1$93026630WQ9LHZ( 16$$QQDSROLV ' 1$5/%DUURZ&DPS7U DU %DGJHU$$3 & )RUW/HVOH\-0F1DLU ( 3DUNV5HVHUYH)RUFHV7UDLQLQJ$UHD ( %XFNOH\$)% ' +DQFRFN)LHOG«««««««««««««««««« & 0\UWOH%HDFK$)%«««««««««««««««« ) 7XOVD,$3 ( (VWHUR%D\)XHO&RPSOH[) 1$93523LWWVILHOG & 16$$QQDSROLV&KHVDSHDNH%D\'HWDFK ( % 3R 56 56 LRQ %ODFN5DSLGV7UDLQLQJ$UHD $ODVND )RUW/HZLV % 3HGULFNWRZQ6XSSRUW)DFLOLW\««««««« ' %XFNOH\$QQH[ ' +DQVFRP$)%««««««««««««««««& 1$60RIIHWW)LHOG««««««««««««««««« ( 7\QGDOO$)%* (ZD +DZDLL 1$968%$6(.LQJV%D\* 16$$WKHQV ) LQW%DUURZ/556 O\65 56 G5 WDW A /RQH /5 VODQ 6 %ORVVRP3RLQW5HVHDUFK)DFLOLW\( )RUW0F&OHOODQ$51*7UDLQLQJ&HQWHU ) 3LFDWLQQ\$UVHQDO' %XUOLQJWRQ,$3««««««««««««««««««& +DUGZRRG:HDSRQV5DQJH«««««««««««« & 1DVKYLOOH,$3«««««««««««««««««« ( 86$)$FDGHP\ ( )RUW$GDPV' 1$968%$6(1HZ/RQGRQ' 16$&UDQH
    [Show full text]
  • APH Fall 2020 Issue All
    FALL 2020 - Volume 67, Number 3 WWW.AFHISTORY.ORG know the past .....Shape the Future The Air Force Historical Foundation Founded on May 27, 1953 by Gen Carl A. “Tooey” Spaatz MEMBERSHIP BENEFITS and other air power pioneers, the Air Force Historical All members receive our exciting and informative Foundation (AFHF) is a nonprofi t tax exempt organization. Air Power History Journal, either electronically or It is dedicated to the preservation, perpetuation and on paper, covering: all aspects of aerospace history appropriate publication of the history and traditions of American aviation, with emphasis on the U.S. Air Force, its • Chronicles the great campaigns and predecessor organizations, and the men and women whose the great leaders lives and dreams were devoted to fl ight. The Foundation • Eyewitness accounts and historical articles serves all components of the United States Air Force— Active, Reserve and Air National Guard. • In depth resources to museums and activities, to keep members connected to the latest and AFHF strives to make available to the public and greatest events. today’s government planners and decision makers information that is relevant and informative about Preserve the legacy, stay connected: all aspects of air and space power. By doing so, the • Membership helps preserve the legacy of current Foundation hopes to assure the nation profi ts from past and future US air force personnel. experiences as it helps keep the U.S. Air Force the most modern and effective military force in the world. • Provides reliable and accurate accounts of historical events. The Foundation’s four primary activities include a quarterly journal Air Power History, a book program, a • Establish connections between generations.
    [Show full text]