APH Fall 2020 Issue All
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Department of Defense Office of the Secretary
Monday, May 16, 2005 Part LXII Department of Defense Office of the Secretary Base Closures and Realignments (BRAC); Notice VerDate jul<14>2003 10:07 May 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\16MYN2.SGM 16MYN2 28030 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 93 / Monday, May 16, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Headquarters U.S. Army Forces Budget/Funding, Contracting, Command (FORSCOM), and the Cataloging, Requisition Processing, Office of the Secretary Headquarters U.S. Army Reserve Customer Services, Item Management, Command (USARC) to Pope Air Force Stock Control, Weapon System Base Closures and Realignments Base, NC. Relocate the Headquarters 3rd Secondary Item Support, Requirements (BRAC) U.S. Army to Shaw Air Force Base, SC. Determination, Integrated Materiel AGENCY: Department of Defense. Relocate the Installation Management Management Technical Support ACTION: Notice of Recommended Base Agency Southeastern Region Inventory Control Point functions for Closures and Realignments. Headquarters and the U.S. Army Consumable Items to Defense Supply Network Enterprise Technology Center Columbus, OH, and reestablish SUMMARY: The Secretary of Defense is Command (NETCOM) Southeastern them as Defense Logistics Agency authorized to recommend military Region Headquarters to Fort Eustis, VA. Inventory Control Point functions; installations inside the United States for Relocate the Army Contracting Agency relocate the procurement management closure and realignment in accordance Southern Region Headquarters to Fort and related support functions for Depot with Section 2914(a) of the Defense Base Sam Houston. Level Reparables to Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, and designate them as Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, as Operational Army (IGPBS) amended (Pub. -
Expressions of Legislative Sentiment Recognizing
MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from electronic originals (may include minor formatting differences from printed original) Senate Legislative Record One Hundred and Twenty-Sixth Legislature State of Maine Daily Edition First Regular Session December 5, 2012 - July 9, 2013 First Special Session August 29, 2013 Second Regular Session January 8, 2014 - May 1, 2014 First Confirmation Session July 31, 2014 Second Confirmation Session September 30, 2014 pages 1 - 2435 SENATE LEGISLATIVE RECORD Senate Legislative Sentiment Appendix Cheryl DiCara, of Brunswick, on her retirement from the extend our appreciation to Mr. Seitzinger for his commitment to Department of Health and Human Services after 29 years of the citizens of Augusta and congratulate him on his receiving this service. During her career at the department, Ms. DiCara award; (SLS 7) provided direction and leadership for state initiatives concerning The Family Violence Project, of Augusta, which is the the prevention of injury and suicide. She helped to establish recipient of the 2012 Kennebec Valley Chamber of Commerce Maine as a national leader in the effort to prevent youth suicide Community Service Award. The Family Violence Project provides and has been fundamental in uniting public and private entities to support and services for survivors of domestic violence in assist in this important work. We send our appreciation to Ms. Kennebec County and Somerset County. Under the leadership of DiCara for her dedicated service and commitment to and Deborah Shephard, the Family Violence Project each year compassion for the people of Maine, and we extend our handles 4,000 calls and nearly 3,000 face to face visits with congratulations and best wishes to her on her retirement; (SLS 1) victims at its 3 outreach offices and provides 5,000 nights of Wild Oats Bakery and Cafe, of Brunswick, on its being safety for victims at its shelters. -
US Army Reserve-Puerto Rico 1St MSC Gazette
1st Mission Support Command - U. S. Army Reserve-Puerto Rico 1st MSC Gazette Vol. No. 6 Issue 6 SUMMER 2015 “Ready, Resilient, Relevant” ON THE COVER: 1ST MSC MORTUARY AFFAIRS UNITS PREPARE TO RESPOND FUTURE LEADERS 10-11 GRADUATE WLC 271st HRC DETACHMENT 4-5 DEPLOYS TO THE MIDDLE EAST www.facebook.com/1stmsc 1st Mission Support Command - U. S. Army Reserve-Puerto Rico 1st MSC Gazette Vol. No. 6 Issue 6 “Ready, Resilient, 1st MSC Gazette Contents Relevant!” Brig. Gen. José R. Burgos Commander Page Page Col. Irene M. Zoppi Deputy Commander 271st Deployment Annual Training 4-5 18-19 Maj. Ruth Castro Pubblic Affair Officer Sgt. 1st Class Lymari Sanchez Page Page Public Affairs NCOIC 6-7 Family Events 20-21 Change of Command The 1st MSC Gazette is an authorized publication printed IAW AR-360-1 in the interest of Soldiers, civilians and Families Page of the 1st MSC. Opinions expressed are those of the 8-9 Promotion / Retirement Ceremonies individuals and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U. S. government. Department of the Army or its agencies. All photos are property of the U.S. Army, Page unless otherwise credited. 1st MSC Gazette is published by the 1st 10-11 Future Leaders G raduate MSC Headquarters located at 353 Wilson Road, Fort Buchanan, PR 00934-4608 E-mail submission to the 1st MSC Public Affairs Officer Page at 12-13 Armed Forces Day FIND US AT: [email protected] 1st MSC Phone Numbers Commander 787-707-4928 Page 1stmsc Deputy Commander 787-707-4944 / Safety Specialist 787-707-4182 Personnel 787-707-4164 14-15 398th FI Det. -
HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES Annette M
1964 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD -HOUSE 5529 In removing it, he dramatized, to my mind, can. They fought with an unrelenting cour it should also end there. They voted in the the coming of age of both this country and age in the economic, political, and mmtary United States with an eye to the effect on the Irish in it. He was the symbol of the battles of the country. They would not give the freedom of Ireland, and in so doing they immigrant--a symbol not exclusively reserved an inch. They were despised and rejected broadened the scope of American polltical for the Irish. and discriminated against, but they did not thinking. I think that Leonard Patrick O'Connor make this an occasion for wa111ng, but only Wibberley in a summation of his book, "The fought the harder. "The slums did not hold them. The mines Coming of the Green," tells us the Irish con "They did not desert their faith, once so did not break them. They were not lost tribution not only to America, but to the unpopular, in order to gain acceptance. Nor building roads and canals in the wilderness. world: did they forget their homeland, for though They were not defeated at the foot of Marye's "The Irish immigrants did what every for they believed that freedom began with the Heights. eign group must do to win the name Ameri- American coastline, they saw no reason why "It was a grand battle, indeed." H.R. 8280. An act for the relief of Mrs. jected by the House last week twists HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Annette M. -
Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 42/Thursday, March 3, 2016
11212 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2016 / Notices TABLE 2—CONCENTRATION LIMITS OF CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS THAT ARE HAZARDOUS AT LESS THAN 0.001 Mg/L— Continued Concentration Concentration Health based limit at the reduction Chemical constituent Waste code limit wellhead factor (mg/L) (mg/L) ) (Note 2) (C/C0 2-Methylpyridine ............................................. U191 ............................................................... 2.0 × 10¥3 1,000 2.0 × 10¥6 3-Methylpyridine ............................................. Note 2 ............................................................. 1.0 × 10¥6 1,000 1.0 × 10¥9 Nickel .............................................................. F006 ............................................................... 0.001 100 1.0 × 10¥5 Nicotinonitrile .................................................. Note 2 ............................................................. 6.0 × 10¥6 6,000 1.0 × 10¥9 Nitrilotiracetonitrile .......................................... Note 2 ............................................................. 1.0 × 10¥6 1,000 1.0 × 10¥9 Nitrobenzene .................................................. U169 ............................................................... 1.8 × 10¥2 100 1.8 × 10¥4 Oleic acid ........................................................ Note 2 ............................................................. 1.0 × 10¥6 1,000 1.0 × 10¥9 Oleoylsarconsinate ......................................... Note 2 ............................................................ -
Brac Commission Findings and Recommendations Department of the Army
BRAC COMMISSION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Note: The recommendations appear in this report in the exact same order, and using the exact same titles, as they appeared in the Department of Defense report submitted May 13, 2005. Paragraphs titled “Secretary of Defense Recommendations,” and “Secretary of Defense Justification” are from the May 13, 2005, report submitted by the Secretary to the BRAC Commission. Where bases not originally listed by DoD have been “added” by the Commission, they will appear at the end of the relevant Report section. FORT WAINWRIGHT, ALASKA RECOMMENDATION # 1 (ARMY 5) ONE-TIME COST: $0.05M ANNUAL RECURRING COSTS/(SAVINGS): ($0.05M) 20-YEAR NET PRESENT VALUE: ($0.7M) PAYBACK PERIOD: 2 YEARS SECRETARY OF DEFENSE RECOMMENDATION Realign Fort Wainwright, AK, by relocating the Cold Regions Test Center (CRTC) headquarters from Fort Wainwright, AK, to Fort Greely, AK. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE JUSTIFICATION This recommendation relocates CRTC headquarters to Fort Greely to improve efficiency of operations and personnel safety. Sufficient capacity exists at Fort Greely. This would not affect Force Structure. This recommendation relocates headquarters closer to the CRTC’s test mission execution on the Bolio Lake Range Complex. This complex, although realigned under Fort Wainwright in BRAC 95, is only 10 miles south of Fort Greely but 100 miles from Fort Wainwright’s cantonment area. This action would improve interoperability and reduce costs by permitting personnel to live closer to their primary work site, thus avoiding a 200-mile round trip between quarters and work sites. It also decreases the risks associated with the required year-round travel in extreme weather conditions and results in more efficient and cost effective monitoring and control of arctic testing of transformational systems. -
166 Public Law 86-500-.June 8, 1960 [74 Stat
166 PUBLIC LAW 86-500-.JUNE 8, 1960 [74 STAT. Public Law 86-500 June 8. 1960 AN ACT [H» R. 10777] To authorize certain construction at military installation!^, and for other pnriwses. He it enacted hy the Hemite and House of Representatives of the 8tfiction^'Acf°^ I'raited States of America in Congress assemoJed, I960. TITLE I ''^^^* SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con- \'erting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, including site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, and equip ment, for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES I'ECHNICAL SERVICES FACILITIES (Ordnance Corps) Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: Training facilities, medical facilities, and utilities, $6,221,000. Benicia Arsenal, California: Utilities, $337,000. Blue Grass Ordnance Depot, Kentucky: Utilities and ground improvements, $353,000. Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey: Research, development, and test facilities, $850,000. Pueblo Ordnance Depot, Colorado: Operational facilities, $369,000. Redstone Arsenal, Alabama: Community facilities and utilities, $1,000,000. Umatilla Ordnance Depot, Oregon: Utilities and ground improve ments, $319,000. Watertow^n Arsenal, Massachusetts: Research, development, and test facilities, $1,849,000. White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico: Operational facilities and utilities, $1,2'33,000. (Quartermaster Corps) Fort Lee, Virginia: Administrative facilities and utilities, $577,000. Atlanta General Depot, Georgia: Maintenance facilities, $365,000. New Cumberland General Depot, Pennsylvania: Operational facili ties, $89,000. Richmond Quartermaster Depot, Virginia: Administrative facili ties, $478,000. Sharpe General Depot, California: Maintenance facilities, $218,000. (Chemical Corps) Army Chemical Center, Maryland: Operational facilities and com munity facilities, $843,000. -
Military Construction, Family Housing, and Base Realignment and Closure Program
CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS (C-1) Department of Defense Budget Fiscal Year 2021 Feb 2020 Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) Preface The C-1 is provided annually to the DoD oversight committees of the Congress coincident with the transmittal of the President's Budget. This document is also provided to Office of Assistance Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs) for use by non-DoD activities, and is available to the public on the Internet at http://comptroller.defense.gov/ Office of the Under Secretary Defense (Comptroller) Department of Defense Preparation of the C-1 cost the Department of Defense a total of approximately $38,000 in FY 2020. i UNCLASSIFIED THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK UNCLASSIFIED TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary State and Country Listing Page FY 2019 Summary by Appropriation………......…………...........................SUMMARY 1-3 Summary by Location and Purpose................................................ 4-13 Summary by State and Country...................................................... 14-15 Summary by State and Country by Component............................. 16-21 FY 2020 Summary by Appropriation………......………............................... 22-24 Summary by Location and Purpose................................................ 25-34 Summary by State and Country...................................................... 35-36 Summary by State and Country by Component............................. 37-41 FY 2021 Summary by Appropriation………......………............................... 42-43 Summary by Location and Purpose............................................... -
1 Las Bases E Instalaciones Militares De Estados Unidos
LAS BASES E INSTALACIONES MILITARES DE ESTADOS UNIDOS EN PUERTO RICO Y SU IMPACTO EN LA SOCIEDAD PUERTORRIQUEÑA Héctor R. Feliciano Ramos Puerto Rico fue descubierto por Cristóbal Colón durante su segundo viaje a América en 1493. Sin embargo, fue necesario esperar 15 años ya que fue en 1508-1509 cuando se inició la colonización española por Juan Ponce de León, quien, por sus características estratégicas, le dio el nombre de Puerto Rico a la que hoy se conoce como Bahía de San Juan. La presencia española duró hasta 1898 cuando Estados Unidos invadió el país como parte de las operaciones de la Guerra Hispano-Cubana-Estadounidense. En esos 390 años España convirtió a Puerto Rico en una de las principales piezas defensivas de su imperio americano en el Caribe. Evidencia de ello son las grandes fortificaciones militares y las murallas del viejo San Juan. El 25 de julio de 1898 —en medio de la Guerra Hispano-Americana— se inició la invasión estadounidense de Puerto Rico y con muy poca resistencia la operación militar concluyó el 12 de agosto de ese año con un triunfo arrollador del ejército de Estados Unidos1. La rapidez de las acciones militares y la ocupación del país, la tecnología y los usos y costumbres que los estadounidenses introdujeron en Puerto Rico deslumbraron a los puertorriqueños de aquella época2. Con la ocupación y el triunfo militar norteamericano de 1898, además de la milicia y la marina, hacía Puerto Rico se movilizó un ejército de diversos sectores de los Estados Unidos que vieron al país caribeño como una oportunidad de adelantar sus intereses particulares. -
“Victory Starts Here” Published in the Interest of the 108Th Training
THE “Victory Starts Here” Published in the interest of the 108th Training Command • Vol 35.1 Spring 2011 THE GRIFFON • Spring 2011 • 3 FFromrom thethe CommandingCommanding GGeneral...eneral... Happy New Year by the end of 2011. In Afghanistan, DoD and the Military Services have sionals should read. the decision of the way ahead will asked for 60 days for a deliberate There are a number of changes occur this summer on the future of planning process to implement. that that affect us in the training forces there. It will be conditions DoD has also asked the Army to re- community. Command Sgt. Maj. based. This will have an impact on duce its current force structure by Payne addresses a few of these in the NATO Training Mission and 49,000 soldiers in the coming years his article. Consolidation of the forces 108th have on the ground on base of 569,400. The Army’s end Drill Sergeant School at Ft. Jack- (Task Force Scorpion). These are strength is currently at its highest son, S.C., reduced Regional Training the trainers for the Afghan National level since the early 1990’s. Center missions, the ANA mission Army and National Police in the Ka- With the Long War on Terror that I mentioned above and all the bul Military Training Center, Afghan now in its ninth year, the Army as a myriad of changes that are occur- Defense University, Branch Schools, profession is pausing to take a hard ring in the Initial Military Training and Regional Training Centers. look at itself to refl ect on where world are just a few. -
Canada Mexico
12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1819 20 21 22 23 24 25 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : United States Army )RUW/HDYHQZRUWK ' 1*76(WKDQ$OOHQ5DQJH& %UDGOH\,$3 ' *ULVVRP$5%««««««««««««««« ' 0RRG\$)%««««««««««««««««««« * 7UDYLV6\VWHP$QQH[( 'DQGDQ*XDP 1$93+,%$6(/LWWOH&UHHN ( 161RUIRON ( ( : : : : : : $EHUGHHQ3URYLQJ*URXQG ' )RUW/HH ( 17&DQG)RUW,UZLQ ) %UDQG\ZLQH*OREHFRP$QQH[ ( *XOISRUW%LOR[L5HJLRQDO$LUSRUW«««««««««« * 0RXQWDLQ+RPH$)%««««««««««««««« & 7UXD[$1*% & 'L[LH7DUJHW5DQJH + 1$93+,%$6(6HDO6LGH* 163HDUO+DUERU+DZDLL $QQLVWRQ$UP\'HSRW ) )RUW/HRQDUG:RRG ( 2UG0LOLWDU\&RPPXQLW\ ( %URRNV$)% + +DDUS5HVHDUFK6WDWLRQ«««««««««««« $ODVND 0XNLOWHR'HIHQVH)XHO6XSSRUW3RLQW«««««««« % 7XFVRQ,$3* (OL]DEHWK5LYHU&KDQQHO( 1$93026630WQ9LHZ( 16$$QQDSROLV ' 1$5/%DUURZ&DPS7U DU %DGJHU$$3 & )RUW/HVOH\-0F1DLU ( 3DUNV5HVHUYH)RUFHV7UDLQLQJ$UHD ( %XFNOH\$)% ' +DQFRFN)LHOG«««««««««««««««««« & 0\UWOH%HDFK$)%«««««««««««««««« ) 7XOVD,$3 ( (VWHUR%D\)XHO&RPSOH[) 1$93523LWWVILHOG & 16$$QQDSROLV&KHVDSHDNH%D\'HWDFK ( % 3R 56 56 LRQ %ODFN5DSLGV7UDLQLQJ$UHD $ODVND )RUW/HZLV % 3HGULFNWRZQ6XSSRUW)DFLOLW\««««««« ' %XFNOH\$QQH[ ' +DQVFRP$)%««««««««««««««««& 1$60RIIHWW)LHOG««««««««««««««««« ( 7\QGDOO$)%* (ZD +DZDLL 1$968%$6(.LQJV%D\* 16$$WKHQV ) LQW%DUURZ/556 O\65 56 G5 WDW A /RQH /5 VODQ 6 %ORVVRP3RLQW5HVHDUFK)DFLOLW\( )RUW0F&OHOODQ$51*7UDLQLQJ&HQWHU ) 3LFDWLQQ\$UVHQDO' %XUOLQJWRQ,$3««««««««««««««««««& +DUGZRRG:HDSRQV5DQJH«««««««««««« & 1DVKYLOOH,$3«««««««««««««««««« ( 86$)$FDGHP\ ( )RUW$GDPV' 1$968%$6(1HZ/RQGRQ' 16$&UDQH -
Introduction to the United States Air Force
Introduction to the United States Air Force B. CHANCE SALTZMAN, Capt, USAF and THOMAS R. SEARLE Airpower Research Institute, College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education, and Air University Press Maxwell AFB, Alabama 2001 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author, and do not necessarily rep- resent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. ii Foreword The initial concept of the Introduction to the United States Air Force was to facilitate the process of learning how the US Air Force became what it is today: The most powerful mil- itary force in the history of the world. And as our Air Force continues to grow, so will this “primer.” I wish to thank Tom Searle at CADRE for giving me the opportunity to help him update this introduction from an “end-user” point of view. This revised edition will take the student up to the twenty-first century by including some recent operations, aircraft, and sig- nificant personalities that were not included in the 1999 edition. Additionally, the 1999 edi- tion included separate sections on significant operations and personalities but in this revised edition operations and personalities have been merged and organized chronologically to better match the needs of AS200. The original organization of the section on aerospace craft has been retained to show the unique developments of each of the different types of plat- forms. For ROTC AS200 instructors: This book is intended to supplement The Concise History of the United States Air Force which is currently being used in the AS200 curriculum.