DOCSLIB.ORG

BASE STRUCTURE REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2010 BASELINE (A Summary of Dod's Real Property Inventory)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BASE STRUCTURE REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2010 BASELINE (A Summary of Dod's Real Property Inventory) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE STRUCTURE REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2010 BASELINE (A Summary of DoD's Real Property Inventory) OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (INSTALLATIONS & ENVIRONMENT) Department of Defense Base Structure Report FY 2010 Baseline I. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... DoD-2 II. Content and Organization ................................................................................................................................................. DoD-3 III. Data Sources, Reporting Criteria, and Definitions ........................................................................................................... DoD-5 IV. Portfolio Summary ............................................................................................................................................................... DoD-9 Buildings Portfolio ............................................................................................................................................................. DoD-12 Structures Portfolio ........................................................................................................................................................... DoD-16 Linear Structures Portfolio ............................................................................................................................................... DoD-19 Land Portfolio .................................................................................................................................................................... DoD-21 State Army National Guard Portfolio .............................................................................................................................. DoD-22 BRAC 2005 ......................................................................................................................................................................... DoD-24 V. Summary of Changes ......................................................................................................................................................... DoD-25 VI. Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................................................... DoD-25 VII. Site Size Summaries ........................................................................................................................................................... DoD-26 VIII. Total DoD Inventory .......................................................................................................................................................... DoD-36 IX. Individual Service Inventories .......................................................................................................................................... DoD-96 Army ................................................................................................................................................................................ ARMY-1 Navy ...................................................................................................................................................................................NAVY-1 Air Force ................................................................................................................................................................ AIR FORCE-1 Marine Corps .................................................................................................................................................................. USMC-1 Washington Headquarters Services ................................................................................................................................. WHS-1 X. State/Territories Army National Guard Inventory ....................................................................................................... STATE-1 Acronyms…..............................................................................................................................................................................Appendix A Cover: Largest sites in the continental United States, by Plant Replacement Value (PRV) Army Navy Air Force Marines Washington Headquarters Services DoD - 1 Department of Defense Base Structure Report FY 2010 Baseline I. Introduction The Department manages a global real property portfolio consisting of more than 539,000 facilities (buildings, structures, and linear structures) located on nearly 5,000 sites covering over 28 million acres. The Base Structure Report (BSR) – FY 2010 Baseline represents a consolidated summary of the DoD’s real property inventory (RPI) as reflected in Military Departments’ and Washington Headquarters Services’ (WHS) native real property databases as of September 30, 2009. The annual reporting of real property assets (facilities and land) to the Secretary of Defense is in accordance with title 10, U.S. Code, section 2721, “Real Property Records.” As established by Executive Order 13327, each year the Department of Defense (DoD) submits real property data at the constructed asset level to the General Services Administration (GSA) for the Federal Real Property Profile (FRPP). The Executive Order states “The policy of the United States is to promote efficient and economical use of America's real property assets and to assure management accountability for implementing federal real property management reforms.” A major initiative within DoD is the implementation of the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) 2005 recommendations which are due to be completed by September of 2011. In meeting the BRAC implementation requirements, we are reorganizing our real property infrastructure to more efficiently and effectively support our military forces, increase operational readiness, and facilitate new business processes. The BSR – FY 2010 provides a comprehensive listing of all sites owned or managed by DoD (inclusion criteria provided in Section III of this report). A site is defined in DoD as a specific geographic location where the DoD owns or manages land, buildings, structures, or linear structures. Sites are assigned to military installations. An installation is commonly referred to as a base, camp, post, station, yard, center, homeport facility for any ship or other activity under the jurisdiction, custody, or control of DoD. A Portfolio Summary of DoD and State Army National Guard real property sites and real property assets (buildings, structures, linear structures, and land) is provided in Section IV of this report. Other pertinent information such as component and the name of the nearest city is also included in each listing. For any questions concerning this report, please send an email message to: [email protected]. Electronic copies are available at http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs under Publications > Reports. DoD - 2 Department of Defense Base Structure Report FY 2010 Baseline II. Content and Organization This report is organized as follows: • Section IV – Provides a portfolio summary of DoD assets and Army State National Guard assets • Section VII – Provides a summary of the sizes of sites in the DoD portfolio • Section VIII – Provides summary statistics for sites in the DoD inventory. • Section IX – Provides summary statistics for sites for each Military Department and WHS • Section X – Provides summary statistics for sites in the Army National Guard portfolio that are managed by the States and Territories. The summary statistics in Sections VIII thru Section X provides information on sites to include the site name, the component (Active, Guard, or Reserve), BRAC identification code, the name of the nearest city, the number of buildings by legal interest, number of acres, the Plant Replacement Value (PRV) in $ millions, and the authorized personnel counts (military, civilian, and other where the information was available). Other personnel include non-appropriated employees, government contractors, or foreign nationals. Based on information supplied by the Army, the Army National Guard sites and assets are divided between the DoD portfolio (Section VIII - DoD Inventory and Section IX - Army Inventory) and the State portfolio (Section X - State / Territories Army National Guard Inventory) sections of the report. Section IV includes an overall summary of the State Army National Guard assets. The sites and assets for the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and WHS are included in the DoD portfolio and in the corresponding component portfolio. As compared to the BSR – FY 2009 Baseline, the total number of DoD sites decreased by 580 sites. This change is mainly due to the method used to distinguish DoD and State Army National Guard sites. Plant Replacement Value (PRV) represents the cost to design and replace an existing facility using current construction standards and codes. The total PRV for DoD facilities changes from year to year as a result of a combination of factors. The majority of changes this year are due to economic factors, not to changes in the DoD inventory of facilities. For example, over 90 percent of the PRV changes between the previous BSR Baseline of 2009 and this BSR baseline can be attributed to an increase in construction costs, represented in the PRV formula as replacement unit cost. Those industry-driven costs increased an average of 6 percent for the types of facilities DoD owns
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Office of the Secretary
    Monday, May 16, 2005 Part LXII Department of Defense Office of the Secretary Base Closures and Realignments (BRAC); Notice VerDate jul<14>2003 10:07 May 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\16MYN2.SGM 16MYN2 28030 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 93 / Monday, May 16, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Headquarters U.S. Army Forces Budget/Funding, Contracting, Command (FORSCOM), and the Cataloging, Requisition Processing, Office of the Secretary Headquarters U.S. Army Reserve Customer Services, Item Management, Command (USARC) to Pope Air Force Stock Control, Weapon System Base Closures and Realignments Base, NC. Relocate the Headquarters 3rd Secondary Item Support, Requirements (BRAC) U.S. Army to Shaw Air Force Base, SC. Determination, Integrated Materiel AGENCY: Department of Defense. Relocate the Installation Management Management Technical Support ACTION: Notice of Recommended Base Agency Southeastern Region Inventory Control Point functions for Closures and Realignments. Headquarters and the U.S. Army Consumable Items to Defense Supply Network Enterprise Technology Center Columbus, OH, and reestablish SUMMARY: The Secretary of Defense is Command (NETCOM) Southeastern them as Defense Logistics Agency authorized to recommend military Region Headquarters to Fort Eustis, VA. Inventory Control Point functions; installations inside the United States for Relocate the Army Contracting Agency relocate the procurement management closure and realignment in accordance Southern Region Headquarters to Fort and related support functions for Depot with Section 2914(a) of the Defense Base Sam Houston. Level Reparables to Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, and designate them as Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, as Operational Army (IGPBS) amended (Pub.
    [Show full text]
  • Expressions of Legislative Sentiment Recognizing
    MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from electronic originals (may include minor formatting differences from printed original) Senate Legislative Record One Hundred and Twenty-Sixth Legislature State of Maine Daily Edition First Regular Session December 5, 2012 - July 9, 2013 First Special Session August 29, 2013 Second Regular Session January 8, 2014 - May 1, 2014 First Confirmation Session July 31, 2014 Second Confirmation Session September 30, 2014 pages 1 - 2435 SENATE LEGISLATIVE RECORD Senate Legislative Sentiment Appendix Cheryl DiCara, of Brunswick, on her retirement from the extend our appreciation to Mr. Seitzinger for his commitment to Department of Health and Human Services after 29 years of the citizens of Augusta and congratulate him on his receiving this service. During her career at the department, Ms. DiCara award; (SLS 7) provided direction and leadership for state initiatives concerning The Family Violence Project, of Augusta, which is the the prevention of injury and suicide. She helped to establish recipient of the 2012 Kennebec Valley Chamber of Commerce Maine as a national leader in the effort to prevent youth suicide Community Service Award. The Family Violence Project provides and has been fundamental in uniting public and private entities to support and services for survivors of domestic violence in assist in this important work. We send our appreciation to Ms. Kennebec County and Somerset County. Under the leadership of DiCara for her dedicated service and commitment to and Deborah Shephard, the Family Violence Project each year compassion for the people of Maine, and we extend our handles 4,000 calls and nearly 3,000 face to face visits with congratulations and best wishes to her on her retirement; (SLS 1) victims at its 3 outreach offices and provides 5,000 nights of Wild Oats Bakery and Cafe, of Brunswick, on its being safety for victims at its shelters.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices Study 2014
    Military Installation and Mission Support Best Practices (25 States / 20 Communities) Prepared for: Florida Defense Support Task Force (FDSTF) Submitted: December 23, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... iii BEST PRACTICES REPORT Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 1 States/ Communities ........................................................................................................... 1 Project Participants ............................................................................................................. 2 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 2 Sources ................................................................................................................................ 3 Findings ............................................................................................................................... 4 STATES 1. Florida .............................................................................................................................. 18 2. Alabama ............................................................................................................................ 26 3. Alaska ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CMSAF Visits Schriever
    COLORADO SPRINGS MILITARY NEWSPAPER GROUP Thursday, March 12, 2015 www.csmng.com Vol. 9 No. 10 Did you know? CMSAF visits Schriever Did you know Schriever Air Force Base is hosting TEDxSchriever in May? The TEDxSchriever team will be hosting a Get To Know TED lunch 11 a.m. to noon Friday at the Building 300 auditorium. The team will be in the auditorium to give information about attending TEDxSchriever, announce the speakers and pho- tography contest. Everyone is invited to attend. Base Briefs Wing holds Chief Cole’s retirement ceremony The 50th Space Wing is hosting the retirement ceremony of Chief Master Sgt. Lavon Coles, the wing’s com- mand chief. The event is 3 p.m. May 1 at the Peterson Air Force Base club. For more information or to RSVP, visit https://einvitations.afit.edu/inv/anim. cfm?i=232338&k=0062400A785F or U.S. Air Force photo/Tech. Sgt. Nicholas B. Ontiveros contact Master Sgt. Teri Freeman. Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force James A. Cody speaks with Airmen during an all-call Friday at Schriever Air Force Base, Colo. Cody also answered their questions and recognized their contributions to the U.S. Air Force during his two-day visit. Pikes Peak Top 3 taking scholarship applications The Pikes Peak Top 3 is currently taking applications for the first quar- ter Enlisted Education Grant Incentive Former Airman sentenced to 18 years in drunken-driving death tells story Program. Please encourage any worthy airman basics to technical sergeants For his first duty station, Wyatt was as- who are enrolled in college courses this signed to the 673rd Communications quarter to apply.
    [Show full text]
  • First Sergeants Launch Schriever's First Food Pantry
    COLORADO SPRING S MILITARY NEW S PAPER GROUP Thursday, July 7, 2011 www.csmng.com Vol. 5 No. 27 Did you know? CC hosts last call By Jennifer Thibault 50th Space Wing Public Affairs On his 680th day in command, Col. Wayne Monteith, 50th Space Wing commander, held his last commander’s call in the base fitness center here. The intent of the call was to update members on the wing’s operations, highlighted by each of the three groups’ senior leaders. Col. John Shaw, 50th Operations U.S. Air Force photo/Master Sgt. Scott Reed Group commander, touted recent op- erations achievements and milestones, Did you know the dental clinic here has specifically the success of the combat walk-in hours? If a patient is experiencing flex exercise and DSCS anomaly reso- pain or has any issues or concerns, they lution procedures and more gener- can call to set up a next-day appointment ally the role our satellites played in or walk-in between the hours of 9:30 and recent humanitarian efforts around 10:30 a.m. For more information call the the world. dental clinic at 567-5065. Next, Lt. Col. John Giles, 50th Network Operations Group deputy commander, explained the group’s op- Base Briefs erations where space and cyber collide. He highlighted the group’s mission as Gym closes for 310 SW call well as that of its 14 geographically The gym in the main fitness cen- separated units. ter will be closed from 3 p.m. Friday The mission support group to noon Saturday in support of the rounded out the updates.
    [Show full text]
  • US Army Reserve-Puerto Rico 1St MSC Gazette
    1st Mission Support Command - U. S. Army Reserve-Puerto Rico 1st MSC Gazette Vol. No. 6 Issue 6 SUMMER 2015 “Ready, Resilient, Relevant” ON THE COVER: 1ST MSC MORTUARY AFFAIRS UNITS PREPARE TO RESPOND FUTURE LEADERS 10-11 GRADUATE WLC 271st HRC DETACHMENT 4-5 DEPLOYS TO THE MIDDLE EAST www.facebook.com/1stmsc 1st Mission Support Command - U. S. Army Reserve-Puerto Rico 1st MSC Gazette Vol. No. 6 Issue 6 “Ready, Resilient, 1st MSC Gazette Contents Relevant!” Brig. Gen. José R. Burgos Commander Page Page Col. Irene M. Zoppi Deputy Commander 271st Deployment Annual Training 4-5 18-19 Maj. Ruth Castro Pubblic Affair Officer Sgt. 1st Class Lymari Sanchez Page Page Public Affairs NCOIC 6-7 Family Events 20-21 Change of Command The 1st MSC Gazette is an authorized publication printed IAW AR-360-1 in the interest of Soldiers, civilians and Families Page of the 1st MSC. Opinions expressed are those of the 8-9 Promotion / Retirement Ceremonies individuals and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U. S. government. Department of the Army or its agencies. All photos are property of the U.S. Army, Page unless otherwise credited. 1st MSC Gazette is published by the 1st 10-11 Future Leaders G raduate MSC Headquarters located at 353 Wilson Road, Fort Buchanan, PR 00934-4608 E-mail submission to the 1st MSC Public Affairs Officer Page at 12-13 Armed Forces Day FIND US AT: [email protected] 1st MSC Phone Numbers Commander 787-707-4928 Page 1stmsc Deputy Commander 787-707-4944 / Safety Specialist 787-707-4182 Personnel 787-707-4164 14-15 398th FI Det.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES Annette M
    1964 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD -HOUSE 5529 In removing it, he dramatized, to my mind, can. They fought with an unrelenting cour­ it should also end there. They voted in the the coming of age of both this country and age in the economic, political, and mmtary United States with an eye to the effect on the Irish in it. He was the symbol of the battles of the country. They would not give the freedom of Ireland, and in so doing they immigrant--a symbol not exclusively reserved an inch. They were despised and rejected broadened the scope of American polltical for the Irish. and discriminated against, but they did not thinking. I think that Leonard Patrick O'Connor make this an occasion for wa111ng, but only Wibberley in a summation of his book, "The fought the harder. "The slums did not hold them. The mines Coming of the Green," tells us the Irish con­ "They did not desert their faith, once so did not break them. They were not lost tribution not only to America, but to the unpopular, in order to gain acceptance. Nor building roads and canals in the wilderness. world: did they forget their homeland, for though They were not defeated at the foot of Marye's "The Irish immigrants did what every for­ they believed that freedom began with the Heights. eign group must do to win the name Ameri- American coastline, they saw no reason why "It was a grand battle, indeed." H.R. 8280. An act for the relief of Mrs. jected by the House last week twists HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Annette M.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Range Remembers at Schriever 9/11 Ceremony
    COLORADO SPRINGS MILITARY NEWSPAPER GROUP Thursday, September 14, 2017 www.csmng.com Vol. 11 No. 37 Did you know? Front Range remembers at 70th Air Force Birthday Schriever 9/11 ceremony REVEILLE AND RETREAT By Airman 1st Class William Tracy 50th Space Wing Public Affairs Did you know in honor of the 70th Front Range community members gathered Air Force Birthday, Monday, Sept. 18, at Schriever to honor the victims of 9/11 during the 50th Space Wing will hold reveille the Pikes Peak 9/11 commemoration ceremony and retreat? A traditional cake cutting ‘A Community Remembers’ Sept. 11. will follow retreat in the Building 210 This year Schriever hosted the ceremony, atrium. Attendance is not mandatory which rotates among different locations across but all are welcome to join, uniform the Front Range. is UOD. Service members across all branches and prominent local community members, includ- ing Colorado Springs Police Department and Base Briefs Colorado Springs and Cimarron Hill’s Fire Department personnel — as well as state and Spouses are invited to municipal government leaders, attended the events marked with event. “When you look at the number of civic leaders THIS WEEK who came out, when you look at the military members who came from other bases outside of EAP Orientation briefing Schriever, it really shows what a strong military There will be an online Employee community we have,” said Lt. Col. Nate Harris, Assistance Program Orientation brief- 50th Space Wing director of staff and event or- ing in the Wing Conference Room 11 ganizer. “They all showed that support joining a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Cradle of Airpower an Illustrated History of Maxwell Air Force Base 1918–2018
    Cradle of Airpower An Illustrated History of Maxwell Air Force Base 1918–2018 Jerome A. Ennels Sr. Robert B. Kane Silvano A. Wueschner Air University Press Curtis E. LeMay Center for Doctrine Development and Education Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Chief of Staff, US Air Force Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Gen David L. Goldfein Names: Ennels, Jerome A., 1950– author. | Kane, Robert B., 1951– author. | Commander, Air Education and Training Wueschner, Silvano A. (Silvano Alfons), 1950– author. | Air University (U.S.). Press, Command publisher. Lt Gen Steven L. Kwast Title: Cradle of aerospace education : an illustrated history of Maxwell Air Force Base, 1918- 2018 / Jerome A. Ennels, Robert B. Kane, Silvano A. Wueschner. Commander and President, Air University Other titles: Illustrated history of Maxwell Air Force Base, 1918–2018 Lt Gen Anthony J. Cotton Description: First edition. | Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama : Air University Press, 2018. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Commander, Curtis E. LeMay Center for Identifiers: LCCN 2018047340 | ISBN 9781585662852 Doctrine Development and Education Subjects: LCSH: Maxwell Air Force Base (Ala.)—History. | Air bases—Alabama— Maj Gen Michael D. Rothstein Montgomery County—History. | Air power—United States—History. | Military education—United States—History. | Air University (U.S.)—History. | United States. Air Director, Air University Press Force—History. Dr. Ernest Allan Rockwell Classification: LCC UG634.5.M35 E55 2018 | DDC 358.4/17/0976147–dc23 | SUDOC D 301.26/6:M 45/3 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018047340 Project Editor Donna Budjenska Cover Art, Book Design, and Illustrations Daniel Armstrong Composition and Prepress Production Nedra Looney Published by Air University Press in October 2018 Print Preparation and Distribution Diane Clark Air University Press 600 Chennault Circle, Bldg.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 42/Thursday, March 3, 2016
    11212 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2016 / Notices TABLE 2—CONCENTRATION LIMITS OF CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS THAT ARE HAZARDOUS AT LESS THAN 0.001 Mg/L— Continued Concentration Concentration Health based limit at the reduction Chemical constituent Waste code limit wellhead factor (mg/L) (mg/L) ) (Note 2) (C/C0 2-Methylpyridine ............................................. U191 ............................................................... 2.0 × 10¥3 1,000 2.0 × 10¥6 3-Methylpyridine ............................................. Note 2 ............................................................. 1.0 × 10¥6 1,000 1.0 × 10¥9 Nickel .............................................................. F006 ............................................................... 0.001 100 1.0 × 10¥5 Nicotinonitrile .................................................. Note 2 ............................................................. 6.0 × 10¥6 6,000 1.0 × 10¥9 Nitrilotiracetonitrile .......................................... Note 2 ............................................................. 1.0 × 10¥6 1,000 1.0 × 10¥9 Nitrobenzene .................................................. U169 ............................................................... 1.8 × 10¥2 100 1.8 × 10¥4 Oleic acid ........................................................ Note 2 ............................................................. 1.0 × 10¥6 1,000 1.0 × 10¥9 Oleoylsarconsinate ......................................... Note 2 ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brac Commission Findings and Recommendations Department of the Army
    BRAC COMMISSION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Note: The recommendations appear in this report in the exact same order, and using the exact same titles, as they appeared in the Department of Defense report submitted May 13, 2005. Paragraphs titled “Secretary of Defense Recommendations,” and “Secretary of Defense Justification” are from the May 13, 2005, report submitted by the Secretary to the BRAC Commission. Where bases not originally listed by DoD have been “added” by the Commission, they will appear at the end of the relevant Report section. FORT WAINWRIGHT, ALASKA RECOMMENDATION # 1 (ARMY 5) ONE-TIME COST: $0.05M ANNUAL RECURRING COSTS/(SAVINGS): ($0.05M) 20-YEAR NET PRESENT VALUE: ($0.7M) PAYBACK PERIOD: 2 YEARS SECRETARY OF DEFENSE RECOMMENDATION Realign Fort Wainwright, AK, by relocating the Cold Regions Test Center (CRTC) headquarters from Fort Wainwright, AK, to Fort Greely, AK. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE JUSTIFICATION This recommendation relocates CRTC headquarters to Fort Greely to improve efficiency of operations and personnel safety. Sufficient capacity exists at Fort Greely. This would not affect Force Structure. This recommendation relocates headquarters closer to the CRTC’s test mission execution on the Bolio Lake Range Complex. This complex, although realigned under Fort Wainwright in BRAC 95, is only 10 miles south of Fort Greely but 100 miles from Fort Wainwright’s cantonment area. This action would improve interoperability and reduce costs by permitting personnel to live closer to their primary work site, thus avoiding a 200-mile round trip between quarters and work sites. It also decreases the risks associated with the required year-round travel in extreme weather conditions and results in more efficient and cost effective monitoring and control of arctic testing of transformational systems.
    [Show full text]