Geothermal Developm in Ieland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geothermal Developm in Ieland Geothermal Policy Options and Instruments for Ukraine Based on Icelandic and International Geothermal Experience Report Prepared for the Ministry for Foreign Affairs in Iceland April 2016 Geothermal Policy Options and Instruments for Ukraine Based on Icelandic and International Geothermal Experience Report Prepared for the Ministry for Foreign Affairs in Iceland Orkustofnun, National Energy Authority Iceland April 2016 Publisher: Orkustofnun, Grensásvegi 9, 108 Reykjavík Tel: 569 6000, Fax, 568 8896 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.nea.is/ Editors: Baldur Pétursson, Jónas Ketilsson. Cooperation Team: Guðni A. Jóhannesson, Alicja Wiktoria Stoklosa, Jón Ragnar Guðmundsson, Sveinbjörn Björnsson, María Guðmundsdóttir, Erla Björk Þorgeirsdóttir, Kristján Geirsson, Skúli Thoroddsen, Rakel Jensdóttir, Hanna Björg Konráðsdóttir, Ingimar G. Haraldsson, Lúðvík S. Georgsson, Þorvaldur Bragason, Anna Lilja Oddsdóttir, Linda Georgsdóttir, Jón Ásgeir Haukdal, Kristinn Einarsson, Benedikt Guðmundsson, Sigurður Ingi Friðleifsson, Jakob Björnsson, Harpa Þórunn Pétursdóttir, Erna R. Bragadóttir and Petra S. Sveinsdóttir. Geothermal Policy Options and Instruments for the Ukraine, is published on the Orkustofnun website and printed in limited copies. OS-2016-01 ISBN 978-9979-68-380-3 Material may be reproduced from the Report, but an acknowledgement of source is kindly requested. April 2016 2 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 8 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................... 10 I. GLOBAL GEOTHERMAL EXPERIENCE ...................................................................................... 16 1. DEVELOPMENT OF THE GEOTHERMAL SECTOR WORLDWIDE .............................................. 16 1.1. OVERVIEW AND CHALLENGES OF THE GEOTHERMAL SECTOR .......................................................... 16 1.2. RENEWABLE / GEOTHERMAL POLICY – OPTIONS AND INSTRUMENTS ................................................ 18 1.3. SUPPORT FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION ....................................................... 21 1.3.1. Operational Support ............................................................................................................ 21 1.3.2. Financial Support ................................................................................................................. 22 2. DEVELOPMENT, COMPETITIVENESS AND RISKS OF GEOTHERMAL PROJECTS................. 25 2.1. RISK AND FINANCING OF GEOTHERMAL PROJECTS ......................................................................... 25 2.2. COMPETITIVENESS OF GEOTHERMAL TECHNOLOGY – COMPARISON ................................................ 26 2.3. COST AND STRUCTURE OF GEOTHERMAL PROJECTS ...................................................................... 27 2.4. GEOTHERMAL DISTRICT HEATING .................................................................................................. 28 2.4.1. Cost Structure of Geothermal District Heating .................................................................... 28 2.4.2. Policy towards Geothermal District Heating in Europe ....................................................... 30 2.4.3. Legal, Financial and Cost Structure of Geothermal District Heating Projects ..................... 32 2.4.4. Global Price Comparison of Geothermal District Heating ................................................... 35 2.4.5. The Geothermal Global Market Structure ........................................................................... 36 2.4.6. Demo I - Business Model for Geothermal District Heating and Gas ................................... 37 2.4.7. Demo II - Business Model for Geothermal District Heating and Gas .................................. 41 3. INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCING OF GEOTHERMAL PROJECTS ............. 47 3.1. INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT MODELS OF GEOTHERMAL PROJECTS ............................................ 47 3.2. INTERNATIONAL FINANCING MODELS OF GEOTHERMAL PROJECTS................................................... 47 3.2.1. Financing Options for Different Project Phases .................................................................. 48 3.2.2. Geothermal Development Assistance – Global Lessons Learned ...................................... 49 II. GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN UKRAINE ........................................ 50 4. UKRAINIAN GEOTHERMAL CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES .......................................... 50 4.1. UKRAINE NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY ACTION PLAN, TO 2020 .................................................. 50 4.1.1. Policy Overview ................................................................................................................... 50 4.1.2. Geothermal Energy ............................................................................................................ 53 4.1.3 Implementations Priorities .................................................................................................... 53 4.2. GEOTHERMAL POTENTIAL IN EUROPE............................................................................................. 55 4.2.1. Heat Production from Geothermal sources in European Union .......................................... 55 4.3. GEOTHERMAL CONDITIONS IN UKRAINE .......................................................................................... 56 4.3.1. Overview of Geothermal Potential Resources in Ukraine ................................................... 57 4.3.2. Development Forecast of Geothermal Capacities in Ukraine ............................................. 59 4.3.3. Assessment Results of Potential Geothermal Resources in Ukraine ................................. 61 4.3.4. Priority Development of Geothermal Resources in Ukraine ................................................ 62 4.4. THE USE OF GEOTHERMAL AND MINERAL WATERS IN THE AREA OF UKRAINIAN CARPATHIANS ........... 63 4.4.1. The use of Geothermal Waters in Carpathian Ukraine ....................................................... 63 4.4.2. The use of Geothermal Waters for Heating Purposes in Ukraine ....................................... 64 4.4.3. The use of Geothermal Waters in Ukraine - Electricity Production ..................................... 65 4.4.4. Prospective Areas of use of Geothermal Energy in Carpathian Ukraine ............................ 66 4.4.5 Geothermal Projects in Carpathians .................................................................................... 67 3 4.4.6. Prospective Areas of use of Geothermal Energy in Zakarpattia Region ............................. 69 4.4.7. Prospective Areas of use of Geothermal Energy in L’viv Region ....................................... 70 4.5. THE CIS-CARPATHIAN DEPRESSION .............................................................................................. 71 4.5.1. Cis-Carpathian ..................................................................................................................... 71 4.6. ADDITIONAL AREA OF INTEREST FOR GEOTHERMAL DISTRICT HEATING ........................................... 74 4.7. SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL AREA FOR GEOTHERMAL DISTRICT HEATING IN WEST UKRAINE ................ 76 4.7.1. Potential Area for Geothermal District Heating in West Ukraine ......................................... 76 4.7.2. The Authorities have made Progress in Reforming the Inefficient Energy Sector .............. 82 4.7.3. Legislative base of Geothermal Energy in Ukraine ............................................................. 82 4.8. THE DISTRICT HEATING SYSTEM IN UKRAINE .................................................................................. 83 4.8.1. Modernization of the District Heating Systems in Ukraine .................................................. 83 4.8.2. What Needs to Happen Next ............................................................................................... 85 4.8.3 What Can the International Financial Institutions Do to Help? ............................................ 87 4.9. COMPETITIVENESS OF THE GEOTHERMAL SECTOR IN UKRAINE........................................................ 88 4.9.1. Opportunities and Policy Options ........................................................................................ 89 4.9.2. Demo – Example of possible Geothermal District Heating Project in Eastern Europe ....... 90 4.10. OPPORTUNITIES AND POLICY OPTIONS FOR UKRAINE ................................................................... 91 4.10.1. Proposal - Two Steps, 1. Pre-Feasibility Study and 2. Project Implementation ................ 92 4.10.2. Proposal – Step 1 - Pre- Feasibility Study of Geothermal District Heating in Ukraine ...... 93 III. GEOTHERMAL DEVELOPMENT AND EXPERIENCE IN ICELAND ......................................... 95 5. GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES IN ICELAND ................................................................................... 95 5.1. THE NATURE OF GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES .................................................................................. 95 5.2. THE NATURE OF OW-TEMPERATURE SYSTEMS ...............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Private Sector Development Policy Handbook
    PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT POLICY HANDBOOK Attracting Investment in Renewable Energy in Ukraine - SECTOR COMPETITIVENESS STRATEGY FOR UKRAINE PHASE II - NOVEMBER 2012 The OECD Eastern Europe and South Caucasus Initiative Launched in April 2009, the OECD Eastern Europe and South Caucasus Initiative is part of the OECD Eurasia Competitiveness Programme, which aims to contribute to economic growth in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine. Its objective is to share with the governments of the region the knowledge, experience and good practices of OECD countries to create a sound business climate for investment, enhance productivity and support entrepreneurship, develop the private sector, and build knowledge-based economies to render its sectors more competitive and attractive to foreign investment. Its approach comprises both a regional policy dimension, which entails peer dialogue and capacity building, and a country-specific aspect supporting the implementation of a number of prioritised reforms. A sector analysis is also included, covering the formulation of targeted policies and strategies requested at the industry level. Within the framework of the programme, public authorities, the private sector and civil society in these countries have been engaged in a dialogue and collaboration process to support policy actions and identify the key barriers to sectoral competitiveness. The participation of all the stakeholders in the reform process, including foreign investors, is considered to be crucial for guaranteeing the effectiveness and transparency of the recommended policies. 2 Foreword Since 2009, the OECD Eurasia Competitiveness Programme has supported the Government of Ukraine in advancing national economic reform through its “Sector Competitiveness Strategy for Ukraine” project. This handbook contains the conclusions of the second phase of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • (Ukrainian-Polish) Oikonymy from the Perspective of Typological Studies in Onomastics
    Science and Education a New Dimension. Philology, IV(18), Issue: 80, 2016 www.seanewdim.com Slavic Regional (Ukrainian-Polish) Oikonymy from the Perspective of Typological Studies in Onomastics Ya. Redkva* Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Paper received 2016.01.27; Revised 2016.01.30; Accepted for publication 2016.02.20. Abstract. In the present study the author proposes new theoretical and methodological approaches to study of Western Ukrainian and Eastern Polish oikonymic systems. The author proposes three major onomastic methods: comparative-typological, comparative- historical, and descriptive. Specific derivational types of place names of the area in the specified time span are analysed in the paper. Important conclusions about cultural-historical, ethno-linguistic, and physical-geographical realia that had an impact on the evolution of the Ukrainian and Polish peoples, common territory of their living are drawn in the study. Keywords: place name, toponym, oikonym, typological onomastics, oikonymic system, Slavic onomastics, historical onomastics. At present we have analyses about productive develop- about realia of separate countries and epochs, about types ment of comparative typological studies of non-cognate of landscape, and the social significance of notions re- language toponymic systems, in particular Ukrainian and flected in lexical stems of the names. The linguistic char- American, German, French [1], [2], Ukrainian and Ger- acter of the typological study of oikonymic systems ex- man [3], and Ukrainian and Rumanian [4], [5]. trapolates into a wide circle of extralinguistic ties, pro- But, alas, at present there are practically no monographic moting and singling out onymic systems from common typological studies of cognate toponymical systems, such linguistic ones, and uniting oikonymic vocabulary on the as toponymical systems of Ukrainian and Polish Lan- basis of its extralinguistic focus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Progress Report on G7 Energy Sector Support for Ukraine
    The Progress Report on G7 Energy Sector Support for Ukraine Foreword The Energy Ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the EU Commissioner for Energy met in Rome in May 2014. They discussed ways to strengthen collective energy security and issued the Rome Energy Security Initiative, which provided for a number of immediate actions to be taken. On the basis of this initiative, Italy compiled “Rome G7 Energy Initiative for Energy Security Implementation Report” and submitted to the Hamburg G7 Energy Ministerial Meeting in May 2015. At the Hamburg meeting in May 2015, G7 Energy Ministers discussed progress since the meeting in Rome in strengthening collective energy security and decided on a further initiative to effectively improve sustainable energy security of G7 countries and beyond, taking into account recent market developments. In the G7 Hamburg Initiative for Sustainable Energy Security, G7 Energy Ministers declared concrete joint actions with non-G7 countries to further strengthen sustainable energy security. In the G7 Elmau Summit Communiqué published in June 2015, the G7 leaders welcomed the Hamburg Initiative and announced their commitment to continue to support vulnerable countries, including Ukraine, in its efforts to reform and liberalize energy systems and aimed to further diversify its energy mix, fuels, energy sources and routes. This paper aims to report to the G7 Energy Ministers about the outcomes of support for Ukraine by G7 member countries, EU and the IEA after the “Rome G7 Energy Initiative for Energy Security Implementation Report”. Given that our support for reforming and liberalizing energy systems in most vulnerable countries including Ukraine, is one of the concrete actions described in the Hamburg G7 Initiative, this paper organizes the current state and progress of reforming Ukraine’s energy system and identifies unsolved issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Market and Policy Outlook for Renewable Energy in Europe and the CIS
    Investment_UNDP_COVER 05/05/14 10:44 Page 1 Empowered lives. Resilient nations. Market and Policy Outlook for Renewable Energy in Europe and the CIS Empowered lives. Resilient nations. UNDP Europe and the CIS Bratislava Regional Centre Grosslingova 35 811 09 Bratislava Slovak Republic Tel.: +421 2 5933 7111 Fax: +421 2 5933 7450 http://europeandcis.undp.org UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME DEVELOPMENT NATIONS UNITED Market and Policy Outlook for Renewable Energy in Europe and the CIS UNDP partners with people at all levels of society to help build nations that can withstand crisis, and drive and sustain the kind of growth that improves the quality of life for everyone. On the ground in more than 170 countries and territories, we offer global perspective and local insight to help empower lives and build resilient nations. May 014 Empowered lives. Resilient nations. copyright © united nations development Programme. all rights reserved. this publication does not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the united nations, including undP, or un Member States, nor do the boundaries and names shown on maps imply official endorsement by the united nations. Author: christoph S. Henrich UNDP reviewers and contributors: Martin krause, John o’brien, daniela carrington, Marina olshanskaya and oliver waissbein. Citation: united nations development Programme (undP), 014: Market and Policy outlook for renewable energy in europe and the ciS ISBN: 978-9-9509-87-7 Editor: tom woodhatch Cover Page Photo Credits: undP europe and the ciS flickr Photo gallery (Montenegro, croatia, albania, kazakhstan, bosnia and Herzegovina, uzbekistan) Design: Valeur s.r.o. Acknowledgments: the author would like to thank John o’brien for his valued technical guidance and continual support.
    [Show full text]
  • And Geothermal Power in Iceland a Study Trip
    2007:10 TECHNICAL REPORT Hydro- and geothermal power in Iceland A study trip Ltu and Vattenfall visit Landsvirkjun May 1-5, 2007 Isabel Jantzer Luleå University of Technology Department of Civil, Mining and Environmental Engineering Division of Mining and Geotechnical Engineering 2007:10|: 102-1536|: - -- 07⁄10 -- Hydro- and geothermal power in Iceland A study trip Ltu and Vattenfall visit Landsvirkjun May 1 – 5, 2007 Iceland is currently constructing the largest hydropower dam in Europe, Kárahnjúkar. There are not many possibilities to visit such construction sites, as the opportunity to expand hydropower is often restricted because of environmental or regional regulations limitations. However, the study trip, which was primarily designed for the visitors from Vattenfall, gave a broad insight in the countries geology, energy resources and production, as well as industrial development in general. This report gives an overview of the trip, summarizes information and presents pictures and images. I want to thank Vattenfall as organization, as well as a large number of individuals at Vattenfall, for giving me the opportunity for participation. Further, I want to express my sincere gratitude to the Swedish Hydropower Center, i.e. Svensk Vattenkraft Centrum SVC, Luleå University of Technology, and individuals at Elforsk for providing me the possibility to take part in this excursion. It has been of great value for me as a young person with deep interest in dam design and construction and provided me with invaluable insights. Luleå, May 2007 Isabel Jantzer Agenda During three days we had the possibility to travel over the country: After the first day in Reykjavik, we flew to Egilstadir in the north eastern part of the country, from where we drove to the Kárahnjúkar dam site and visited the Alcoa aluminium smelter at Reydarfjördur Fjardaál afterwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Autumn 1997 of Proportional Representation for a Term of Four Years
    The Economy of Iceland CENTRAL BANK OF ICELAND The Economy of Iceland October 1997 Published semi-annually by the International Department of the Central Bank of Iceland, 150 Reykjavík, Iceland ISSN 1024 - 0039 REPUBLIC OF ICELAND People Population.......................................269,735 (December 1, 1996) Capital.............................................Reykjavík, 105,487 (December 1, 1996) Language........................................Icelandic; belongs to the Nordic group of Germanic languages Religion...........................................Evangelical Lutheran (95%) Life expectancy...............................Females: 81 years , Males: 75 years Governmental System Government ....................................Constitutional republic Suffrage ..........................................Universal, over 18 years of age Legislature ......................................Alþingi (Althing); 63 members Election term...................................Four years Economy Monetary unit ..................................Króna (plural: krónur); currency code: ISK Gross domestic product..................487 billion krónur (US$ 7.3 billion) in 1996 International trade...........................Exports 36% and imports 36% of GDP in 1996 Per capita GDP...............................1,760 thousand krónur (US$ 26.900) in 1996 Land Geographic size..............................103,000 km2 (39,768 mi2) Highest point...................................2,119 m (6,952 ft) Exclusive economic zone ...............200 nautical miles (758,000 km2
    [Show full text]
  • Thematic Handbook No. 7 SUPPORT of SOCIAL and CULTURAL INTEGRATION
    CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME POLAND-BELARUS-UKRAINE 2007-2013 Thematic handbook no. 7 SUPPORT OF SOCIAL AND CULTURAL INTEGRATION EUROPEAN UNION INTRODUCTION 2 SUPPORT OF SOCIAL AND CULTURAL INTEGRATION Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 2. POLISH EASTERN BORDER – NEW HISTORIC PHENOMENON 3. POLISH-UKRAINIAN-BELARUSIAN CROSS-BORDER REGION 4. PROJECT AREA-CHARACTERISTICS 5. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE REGULAR PROJECTS 6. IMPACT OF THE REGULAR PROJECTS ON A REGIONAL SCALE 7. RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS 8. SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION ocial and cultural integration are very current and important issues that should be considered both at national, regional and local levels and from different perspectives S in the area of the European Union. In the research on civil society and relationship of civil societies in the EU, social integration is treated as a special perspective value, without which it would be difficult to talk about the success of the European, political, economic and social project. Social integration, as one of the fundamental concepts of functionalism, means "the rela- tionship between parts of the system, whereby they operate so that, on the one hand, they could prevent the disintegration of the system and maintain its stability together, and on the other co-occur while maintaining its functioning as a whole"1. As G. Firlit-Fesnak notes, "apart from sociological perspective, in many social sciences the term is often used more loosely, as a synonym for social consensus, obtained from the relationship between different social actors, based on clear rules (conditions) allowing the involvement of various social groups in larger social communities”2. Generally speaking, it can be said that social integration is a process that has been defined in terms of sociology and other social sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Framework and National Policy for Geothermal Development in Iceland
    Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2015 Melbourne, Australia, 19-25 April 2015 Legal Framework and National Policy for Geothermal Development in Iceland Jonas Ketilsson, Harpa Th. Petursdottir, Skuli Thoroddsen, Anna L. Oddsdottir, Erna R. Bragadottir, Maria Gudmundsdottir, Gudni A. Johannesson Orkustofnun, Grensasvegi 9, IS-108 Reykjavik, Iceland Corresponding author: [email protected] Keywords: Legal, law, energy, regulatory, official, monitoring, geothermal, statistics, policy, Master Plan, Iceland, Europe. ABSTRACT In this paper, a description is given of the national policy, legal framework, official monitoring and accumulation of geothermal energy statistics in Iceland in a global context. The legal framework and amendments to the energy legal framework since 2010 will be reviewed. In particular the effect of Act for the Master Plan for the Utilization and Protection of Energy Resources no. 48/2011 which sets up the legal framework for the Master Plan which has been in preparation since 1999, where geothermal and hydro resources are categorized to be exploited, protected or further researched. It is the policy of the Government of Iceland to increase the utilization of energy resources and hence governmental support was increased for new geothermal based heat utilities by 50% even though 9 out of 10 households are heated with geothermal energy. The Icelandic National Renewable Energy Action Plan was published in year 2012 in accordance with Directive 2009/28/EC which outlines the strategy for 2020 and goals of geothermal utilization. In accordance with the plan, electricity generation from geothermal sources is estimated to increase by 12% from 5.2 TWh in year 2014 to 5.8 TWh in year 2020 and geothermal heat use from 28.1 PJ in year 2014 to 34 PJ in year 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Security and Identity: Iceland
    FOOD SECURITY AND IDENTITY: ICELAND A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts by Gina Marie Butrico August, 2013 Thesis written by Gina Butrico A.A.S., Middlesex County College, 2009 B.A., Kent State University, 2011 M.A., Kent State University, 2013 Approved by ___________________________________, Advisor Dr. David H. Kaplan, Ph.D. ___________________________________, Chair, Department of Geography Dr. Mandy Munro-Stasiuk, Ph.D. ___________________________________, Associate Dean for Graduate Affairs, Raymond A. Craig, Ph.D. College of Arts and Sciences ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ..........................................................................................................v List of Tables ....................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ ix Chapter I. Introduction .................................................................................................1 Food Security in Iceland ..............................................................................3 Food Identity in Iceland ...............................................................................5 Site Selection ...............................................................................................6 Food Geography...........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine
    Syracuse University SURFACE Religion College of Arts and Sciences 2005 Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine Samuel D. Gruber United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/rel Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Gruber, Samuel D., "Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine" (2005). Full list of publications from School of Architecture. Paper 94. http://surface.syr.edu/arc/94 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religion by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel
    [Show full text]
  • Природнi Лiси Українських Карпат Natural Forests Of
    Фонд Всесвітній фонд Міхаеля Зуккова природи Michael Succow World Wide Fund Foundation for Nature ПрироднI лIси Українських карПат NATURAL FORESTS OF UKRAINIAN CARPATHIANS карти і атласи львів-2018 УДК 911.2:581.9(477:292.452) Природні ліси Українських Карпат / Ред. А. Смалійчук та У. Гребенер – Львів: Карти і Атласи, 2018. – 104 с. A. Smaliychuk & U. Gräbener (Eds) 2018. Natural forests of Ukrainian Carpathians. Carty i Atlasy, Lviv. 104 p. (in Ukrainian). Автори текстів: Улі Гребенер, Ганс Дітер Кнапп, Богдан Проць, Анатолій Смалійчук, Роман Волосянчук. Автори фотографій: Михайло Богомаз, Гартмут Мюллер, Маттіас Шікгофер, Володимир Савчин, Андрій Юзик, Олександр Ярош, Роман Лазарович, Анатолій Смалійчук, Василь Покиньчереда. Детальніше див. на сторінці 103. Карти: Анатолій Смалійчук Дизайн: Ігор Дикий Редактори: Анатолій Смалійчук, Улі Гребенер Наукові рецензенти: проф., д-р Ганс Дітер Кнапп, к.с.-г.н., доц. Микола Чернявський, к.б.н., с.н.с. Богдан Проць Text authors: Uli Gräbener, Hans Dieter Knapp, Bohdan Prots, Anatoliy Smaliychuk, Roman Volosyanchuk. Picture authors: Mykhailo Bogomaz, Hartmut Müller, Matthias Schickhofer, Volodymyr Savchyn, Andriy Yuzyk, Oleksandr Yarosh, Roman Lazarovich, Anatoliy Smaliychuk, Vasyl Pokynchereda. For more details see page 103. Maps: Anatoliy Smaliychuk Design: Ihor Dykyi Editors: Anatoliy Smaliychuk, Uli Gräbener Scientific eviewr ers: Prof. Dr. Hans Dieter Knapp, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mykola Chernyavskyi, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Bohdan Prots Фінансова підтримка проекту здійснюється Федеральним міністерством навколишнього се- редовища, охорони природи та безпеки ядерних реакторів (BMU) в рамках Програми консуль- таційної допомоги для охорони навколишнього середовища (AAP) в країнах Центральної та Східної Європи, Кавказу та Центральної Азії, а також в інших країнах, розташованих по сусідству з Європейським Союзом.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices I
    Appendices I. Archival Sources Archival research for this monograph was conducted in Lviv, the former capital of Galicia, in 1983. To orient myself in the rich archival holdings of this city, I benefitted from the unpublished manuscript of Patricia K. Grimsted's forthcoming guide to Soviet Ukrainian archives and manuscript repositories' as well as from a number of published works.' Plans to use archives in Ternopil and Ivano-Frankivsk were frustrated, as was the plan to use the manuscript collection of the Institute of Literature of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR (in Kiev). Work in the Austrian archives in 1982 did not uncover sources of direct relevance to the subject of this monograph, but the Viennese archives remain an important and little-explored repository of historical documentation on Galician history. The richest collection of unpublished sources on the history of Galicia during the Austrian period is located in the Central State Historical Archives of the Ukrainian SSR in Lviv (U Tsentrainyi derzhavnyi istorychnyi arkhiv URSR u rn. Lvovi; abbre- viated as TsDIAL). The Central Archives have inherited the papers of various Galician government institutions and major civic organizations. Unfortunately, there is no published guide to these archives, although a number of articles describe aspects of their holdings.' The papers of the Presidium of the Galician Viceroy's Office (U Haiytske narnisnytstvo, rn. Lviv. Prezydiia) are contained in TsDIAL, fond 146, opysy 4-8 (and presumably others). Particularly valuable for this study were documents dealing with the publication and confiscation of political brochures and periodicals, including , Patricia K.
    [Show full text]