LSSIP 2020 - FINLAND LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2020 1 - Implementation Overview
Document Title LSSIP Year 2020 for Finland
Info Centre Reference 20/12/22/62 Date of Edition 31/03/2021 LSSIP Focal Point Jouko RANTA - [email protected] Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom LSSIP Contact Person Luca DELL’ORTO – [email protected] EUROCONTROL/NMD/INF/PAS LSSIP Support Team [email protected] Status Released Intended for EUROCONTROL Stakeholders Available in https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring
Reference Documents
LSSIP Documents https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Master Plan Level 3 – Plan https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Edition 2020 implementation-plan-level-3 Master Plan Level 3 – Report https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Year 2020 implementation-report-level-3 European ATM Portal https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor National AIP https://www.ais.fi/en Performance Plan https://www.traficom.fi/en/transport/aviation/air-navigation-services-and- airspace
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland Released Issue
APPROVAL SHEET
The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2020 document and the signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect the commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 (Implementation View) – Edition 2020.
Stakeholder / Name Position Signature and date Organisation
Finnish Transport and Deputy Director- Communications Jarkko SAARIMÄKI General Agency Traficom
Fintraffic Air CEO of Fintraffic Air Navigation Services Raine LUOJUS Navigation Services Ltd Ltd
Finnish Military Kim JUHALA Director of MAA Aviation Authority
CEO of Finavia Finavia Corporation Kimmo MÄKI Corporation
Finnish Director Meteorological Juhana HYRKKÄNEN Accountable Manager Institute
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland Released Issue
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary ...... 1 Introduction ...... 12 1. National ATM Environment ...... 13 Geographical Scope ...... 13 National Stakeholders ...... 15 2. Traffic and Capacity ...... 22 Evolution of traffic in Finland ...... 22 ACC Helsinki ...... 23 3. Implementation Projects ...... 26 National projects ...... 26 FAB projects ...... 26 Multinational projects ...... 27 4. Cooperation activities ...... 28 FAB Co-ordination ...... 28 Multinational cooperation initiatives...... 28 5. Implementation Objectives Progress ...... 30 State View: Overall Objective Implementation Progress ...... 30 Objective Progress per SESAR Essential Operational Changes...... 31 ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress ...... 37 Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ...... 42 6. Annexes ...... 61 A. Specialists involved in the ATM implementation reporting for Finland ...... 61 B. National stakeholders organisation charts ...... 62 C. Implementation Objectives’ links with other plans ...... 67 D. SESAR Solutions implemented in a voluntary way...... 72 E. Surveillance (SUR)...... 73 F. Glossary of abbreviations ...... 74
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland Released Issue
Executive Summary
National ATM Context
Member State of:
Main national stakeholders: - Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom – the civil aviation regulatory body and NSA ; - Fintraffic Air Navigation Services Ltd – the main ATS-provider in Finland; - Finavia Corporation – the main airport operator in Finland; - Finnish Meteorological Institute – designated MET provider; - City of Mikkeli – operator in Mikkeli airport (EFMI) and AFIS provider; - Seinäjoki Airport Ltd. – operator in Seinäjoki airport (EFSI) and AFIS provider; - Lappeenranta Airport Ltd. – operator in Lappeenranta airport (EFLP); - Military Aviation Authority (MAA) – the military regulatory body; - Air Force Command Finland; - Safety Investigation Authority (SIA).
Main airport covered by LSSIP: Helsinki-Vantaa (EFHK)
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 1 Released Issue Traffic and Capacity
-59% 2020 2020
Helsinki ACC
0.00 2019-2020
Finland is part of:
The North European Functional Airspace Block
Number of national projects: N/A (Projects mainly concentrated on ESSIP- and PCP Objectives) Number of FAB projects: 1 (FINEST) Number of multinational projects: 1 (Borealis Free Route Airspace, )
Summary of 2020 developments: Due to the decrease in staff availability caused by the Covid-19 actions and the response to traffic change, the projects could not be promoted as normal. Most of the ESSIP-objectives and PCP families are on time or completed. No major changes in organisational structures within national stakeholders during 2020. From the beginning of November, Finnish Meteorological Institute started sending weather messages also in digital IWXXM format, by using AMHS line.
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 2 Released Issue Progress per SESAR Phase
The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline (Pre-SESAR and SESAR1 non- PCP) and the PCP elements. It shows the average implementation progress for all objectives grouped by SESAR Phases, excluding those for which the State is outside the applicability area as defined on a yearly basis in the European ATM Master Plan (Level 3) 2020, i.e. disregarding the declared “NOT APPLICABLE” LSSIP progress status. The SESAR 1 (non-PCP) progress in the graphics below for this State is based on the following objectives: AOP 14, AOP15, AOP16, AOP18, ATC02.9, ATC18, ATC19, ATC20, NAV12 and COM11.2.
Pre-SESAR Phase 2000 2030
88%
SESAR 1 (PCP only) 2011 2025
42%
SESAR 1 (non-PCP) 2013 2030
17%
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 3 Released Issue Progress per SESAR Essential Operational Changes and Phase
The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Essential Operational Changes, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per EOC, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph.
ATM 82 % Interconnected Network 32 %
Airport and TMA 96 % performance 0 % 0 %
CNS 82 % Infrastructure 40 % and Services 40 %
Digital AIM and 28 % MET Services
Fully Dynamic 100 % and Optimised 0 % Airspace 50 %
Multimodal Mobility and 0 % integration of all Airspace Users Trajectory Based 100 % Operations 65 %
Virtualisation of Service Provision 0 %
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Pre-SESAR Phase SESAR 1 (non-PCP) SESAR 1 (PCP only)
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 4 Released Issue ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation
The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Blocks. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter 5.3 – ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress.
Block 0 2000 2030
89%
Block 1 2009 2030
43%
Block 2 2013 2030
10%
Block 3 2018 2025
1%
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 5 Released Issue ATM Deployment Outlook
State Objectives
Deployed in 2019 - 2020 - Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) ITY-FMTP - 100 % progress
By 2021 By 2022 By 2023 By 2024+
- Enhanced STCA with - Electronic Terrain and - Multi-Sector Planning - Information Exchanges down-linked parameters Obstacle Data (eTOD) En-route - 1P2T using the SWIM Yellow TI via Mode S EHS INF07 - 16 % progress ATC18 - 00 % progress Profile ATC20 - 30 % progress - Aircraft Identification INF08.1 - 01 % progress - Voice over Internet ITY-ACID - 75 % progress - 8,33 kHz Air-Ground Protocol (VoIP) in En- - Harmonise Operational Voice Channel Spacing Route Air Traffic (OAT) and below FL195 COM11.1 - 40 % progress General Air Traffic (GAT) ITY-AGVCS2 - 72 % - Short Term ATFCM Handling progress Measures (STAM) - Phase AOM13.1 - 65 % progress - ATS IFR Routes for 2 Rotorcraft Operations FCM04.2 - 10 % progress NAV12 - 00 % progress - Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in Airport/Terminal COM11.2 - 40 % progress - Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information ITY-ADQ - 40 % progress - Management of Pre- defined Airspace Configurations AOM19.4 - 10 % progress - Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring ATC12.1 - 78 % progress - ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA (AFUA) AOM19.1 - 53 % progress - Interactive Rolling NOP FCM05 - 40 % progress - Migrate from AFTN to AMHS COM10 - 78 % progress
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 6 Released Issue - Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing AOM19.3 - 58 % progress - Traffic Complexity Assessment FCM06 - 10 % progress - ASM Management of Real-Time Airspace Data AOM19.2 - 52 % progress - RNP Approach Procedures to instrument RWY NAV10 - 70 % progress - RNAV 1 in TMA Operations NAV03.1 - 81 % progress
Airport Objectives - Helsinki Vantaa Airport
Deployed in 2019 - 2020 - Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) ENV03 - 100 % progress
By 2021 By 2022 By 2023 By 2024+
- Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) ENV01 - 82 % progress
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 7 Released Issue Airport Objectives - KEMI-TORNIO
Deployed in 2019 - 2020 None
By 2021 By 2022 By 2023 By 2024+
- Remote Tower Services AOP14 - 00 % progress
Airport Objectives - VAASA
Deployed in 2019 - 2020 None
By 2021 By 2022 By 2023 By 2024+
- Enhanced traffic situational awareness and airport safety nets for the vehicle drivers AOP15 - 00 % progress
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 8 Released Issue Overall situation of Implementation Objectives
Progress Main Objectives Topic at the end Status 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 >2025 of 2020 AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General 65% Late Air Traffic (GAT) Handling AOM19.1 ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA (AFUA) 53% Ongoing * AOM19.2 ASM Management of Real-Time Airspace Data 52% Ongoing * AOM19.3 Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM 58% Ongoing * Information Sharing AOM19.4 Management of Pre-defined Airspace Configurations 10% Ongoing * AOM21.1 Direct Routing 0% Not Applicable AOM21.2 Free Route Airspace 100% Completed * AOP04.1(EFHK) Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control 100% Completed * System A-SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) AOP04.2(EFHK) Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control 100% Completed * System (A-SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) AOP05(EFHK) Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) 100% Completed * AOP10(EFHK) Time-Based Separation 0% Not * Applicable AOP11(EFHK) Initial Airport Operations Plan 0% Not * Applicable AOP12(EFHK) Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting 0% Not * ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Applicable Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) AOP13(EFHK) Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface 0% Not * Movement Planning and Routing Applicable AOP14(EFKE) Remote Tower Services 0% Planned 2030 AOP15(EFVA) Enhanced traffic situational awareness and airport 0% Planned 2030 safety nets for the vehicle drivers AOP16(EFHK) Guidance assistance through airfield ground lighting 0% Not yet 2030 planned
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 9 Released Issue Progress Main Objectives Topic at the end Status 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 >2025 of 2020 AOP17(EFHK) Provision/integration of departure planning 0% Not 2030 information to NMOC Applicable AOP18(EFHK) Runway Status Lights (RWSL) 0% Not yet 2030 planned ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term 100% Completed Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 for en-route operations ATC02.8 Ground-Based Safety Nets 100% Completed * ATC02.9 Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs 100% Completed * ATC07.1(EFHK) AMAN Tools and Procedures 100% Completed * ATC12.1 Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution 78% Ongoing * Support Information and Conformance Monitoring ATC15.1 Information Exchange with En-route in Support of 100% Completed AMAN ATC15.2 Arrival Management Extended to En-route Airspace 0% Not * Applicable ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 100% Completed ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to 100% Completed * Controller during Coordination and Transfer ATC18 Multi-Sector Planning En-route - 1P2T 0% Planned 2030 ATC19 Enhanced AMAN-DMAN integration 0% Not yet 2030 planned ATC20 Enhanced STCA with down-linked parameters via 30% Ongoing 2030 Mode S EHS COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS 78% Late COM11.1 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in En-Route 40% Ongoing * COM11.2 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in 40% Ongoing * Airport/Terminal COM12 New Pan-European Network Service (NewPENS) 100% Completed * ENV01(EFHK) Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) 82% Ongoing * ENV02(EFHK) Airport Collaborative Environmental Management 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(EFHK) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management 100% Completed services
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 10 Released Issue Progress Main Objectives Topic at the end Status 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 >2025 of 2020 FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning 100% Completed * FCM04.2 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) - Phase 2 10% Ongoing * FCM05 Interactive Rolling NOP 40% Ongoing * FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment 10% Ongoing * INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) 16% Late INF08.1 Information Exchanges using the SWIM Yellow TI 1% Ongoing * Profile ITY-ACID Aircraft Identification 75% Late * ITY-ADQ Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical 40% Late Information ITY-AGDL Initial ATC Air-Ground Data Link Services 100% Completed * ITY-AGVCS2 8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Channel Spacing below 72% Completed * FL195 ITY-COTR Implementation of ground-ground automated co- 100% Completed ordination processes ITY-FMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) 100% Completed ITY-SPI Surveillance Performance and Interoperability 100% Completed * NAV03.1 RNAV 1 in TMA Operations 81% Ongoing 2030 NAV03.2 RNP 1 in TMA Operations 0% Not yet * planned NAV10 RNP Approach Procedures to instrument RWY 70% Ongoing * NAV12 ATS IFR Routes for Rotorcraft Operations 0% Planned 2030 SAF11 Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway 100% Completed Excursions
LEGEND: * Full Operational Capability (FOC) date The Planned Implementation Date as reported in the LSSIP DB for each objective
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 11 Released Issue
Introduction
The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3)/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2020, together with plans for the next years.
Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, it gives an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units and the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP;
Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It also presents the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity, taking into account the current aviation situation caused by the COVID19 crisis;
Chapter 3 provides the main Implementation Projects (at national, FAB and multinational level) which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. The Level 1 document covers a high-level list of the projects showing the applicable links. All other details like description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas provided by the State per each project are available in the Level 2 document;
Chapter 4 deals with other cooperation activities beyond Implementation Projects. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation, as well as all other multinational initiatives, which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned;
Chapter 5 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Essential Operational Change and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition, it provides the high-level information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.
The Level 1 document is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders (REG, ASP, MIL and APO) to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition 2020. In addition, it covers a detailed description of the Implementation Projects for the State as extracted from the LSSIP DataBase.
The information contained in Chapter 5 – Implementation Objectives Progress is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 12 Released Issue
1. National ATM Environment
Geographical Scope
International Membership
Finland is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:
Organisation Since ECAC 1955 EUROCONTROL 2001 European Union 1995 EASA 2006 ICAO 1949 NATO - - ITU 1920 EDA 2004
Geographical description of the FIR(s)
The geographical scope of this document addresses the Helsinki FIR (EFIN).
Helsinki FIR is surrounded by FIRs of 4 States: Norway, Sweden, Estonia and Russia.
In order to achieve some of the objectives of the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan (a.k.a. the ESSIP Plan), Helsinki ACC co-ordinates actions with a number of foreign adjacent ACCs.
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 13 Released Issue
Airspace Classification and Organisation
On 27 November 2003, ICAO airspace Class C was implemented above FL 95 and the upper limit of controlled airspace was raised to FL660. AIP Finland is available at: https://www.ais.fi/en
ATC Units
The ATC units in the Finnish airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following:
ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks En-route TMA Helsinki ACC 14 EFIN (EFIN) Helsinki APP 4 EFIN
Note: The number of sectors as indicated in this table is the number of technically existing sectors; some of those sectors are operationally used in combined sector formats.
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 14 Released Issue
National Stakeholders
The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Finland are the following: - Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom – the civil aviation regulatory body and NSA; - Fintraffic Air Navigation Services Ltd – the main ATS-provider in Finland; - Finavia Corporation – the main airport operator in Finland; - Finnish Meteorological Institute – designated MET provider; - City of Mikkeli – operator in Mikkeli airport (EFMI) and AFIS provider; - Seinäjoki Airport Ltd. – operator in Seinäjoki airport (EFSI) and AFIS provider; - Lappeenranta Airport Ltd. – operator in Lappeenranta airport (EFLP); - Military Aviation Authority (MAA) – the military regulatory body; - Air Force Command Finland; - Safety Investigation Authority (SIA).
Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below.
Council of State
Prime Minister’s Ministry of Transport Ministry of Justice Ministry of Defence Office and Communications
Finnish Transport Safety Investigation Defence Command Air Force Command Finavia Corporation and Communications Authority Finland Finland Agency
Fintraffic Air Navigation Services Military Aviation Ltd Authority
Finnish Meteorological Institute (METSP)
City of Mikkeli Lappeenranta Seinäjoki Airport (Mikkeli Airport Airport ANSP)
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 15 Released Issue
Civil Regulator(s)
General Information
Civil Aviation in Finland is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport and Communications. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below.
Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis Rule-making Parliament of Finland, Constitution of Finland (731/1999) Ministry of Transport and Aviation Act (864/2014) Communications, Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom Safety Oversight Finnish Transport and Aviation Act (864/2014) Communications Agency Traficom (NSA) Enforcement actions in case of Finnish Transport and Aviation Act (864/2014), Criminal Code (39/1889) non-compliance with safety Communications Agency regulatory requirements Traficom Airspace Government of Finland, Aviation Act (864/2014) Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom Economic Finnish Transport and Aviation Act (864/2014) Communications Agency Traficom Environment Environmental permit Permit authority according to Environmental Protection authority Act 527/2014 and Environmental protection decree Finnish Transport and 713/2014 grants environmental permits for airports. Communications Agency Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom Traficom has regulatory power in some environmental issues according to Aviation Act (864/2014). Security Finnish Transport and Aviation Act (864/2014) and Act on the Finnish Communications Agency Transport and Communications Agency (935/2018) Traficom Accident investigation Safety Investigation Safety Investigation Act (525/2011) Authority
Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom, the CAA Finland, is further detailed in the following sections.
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 16 Released Issue FINNISH CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY
The Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom carry out the civil aviation regulatory tasks. It is an independent agency operating under the Ministry of Transport and Communications (MoTC) and is organisationally separated from the Air Navigation Service Providers.
Annual Report published: N Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom doesn’t publish an annual report.
The Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom is the National Supervisory Authority (NSA) in Finland. https://www.traficom.fi/en/ The current organisation chart is given in Annexes.
Fintraffic Air Navigation Services Ltd
Service provided
Fintraffic Air Navigation Services Ltd
Governance: Limited liability company Ownership: 100 % State owned Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en-route Y ATC approach Y ATC Aerodrome(s) Y AIS Y CNS Y MET N ATCO training Y Others Y ANS technical services Additional information: Provision of services in N other State(s): Annual Report published: N Will be published later in 2021
Fintraffic Air Navigation Services Ltd website can be found at: https://www.fintraffic.fi/en/ans
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 17 Released Issue ATC Systems in use
Main ANSP part of any technology alliance1 -
FDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: THALES AS Upgrade2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? EFIN 2015, EFHK 2015 Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? The present Thales TopSky ATM-system is under continuous development. ATC Unit EFIN ACC, EFHK TWR/APP, smaller TWR/APP and TWR systems at 22 sites.
SDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: THALES AS Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? EFIN 2017, EFHK 2017 Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? The present Thales TopSky ATM-system is under continuous development. ATC Unit EFIN ACC, EFHK TWR/APP, smaller TWR/APP and TWR systems at 22 sites.
Airports
General information
Finavia Corporation is the main airport operator in Finland, responsible for maintaining 21 airports, of which 18 are involved in regular traffic. Finavia Corporation is 100 % state owned enterprise. Helsinki Airport is the primary airport and the only one being co-ordinated and covered by the LSSIP. Due to Covid-19, 11 of Finavia airports were closed for several months in the summer of 2020. In addition, there are three non-state-owned airports in Finland not managed by Finavia (Lappeenranta, Mikkeli and Seinäjoki).
Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP
Referring to the List of Airports in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2020 – Annex 2, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those Objectives.
According to these criteria, the airport covered in this LSSIP is Helsinki-Vantaa airport.
The EUROCONTROL Public Airport Corner also provides information for Helsinki-Vantaa airport: https://ext.eurocontrol.int/airport_corner_public/EFHK
1 Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 18 Released Issue Military Authorities
The Military Authorities in Finland are composed of: - Defence Command Finland; - Air Force Command Finland; - Navy Command Finland; - Army Command Finland; - Military Aviation Authority (MAA). They are supervised by the ministry of Defence. Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below. The Military Aviation Authority (MAA) carries out its assigned tasks as decreed in the Aviation Act. The MAA is responsible for the safety and monitoring of military aviation and for other tasks that are within the prerogatives of a military aviation authority e.g. certification of military aircraft and equipment, and participation in decision making progress concerning airspace management. Finland has an integrated civil-military ATM system without permanently segregated military airspace. Segregation of airspace for military use is done on basis of actual needs. Information on the application of FUA is provided at the end of this chapter. The current organisation chart is given in Annexes.
Regulatory role
Regulatory framework and rule-making
OAT GAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed N/A national legal provisions? by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: Level of such legal provision: N/A 1) Finnish Aviation Act
2) Aviation Regulation-series (issued by FCAA, incl. Rules of the Air) 3) Military Aviation Regulations (issued by MAA, e.g.regulations on Air Traffic Services for military aviation) 4) Military Aviation Regulations (issued by FINAF; e.g. prerogatives) Authority signing such legal provision: Authority signing such legal provision: N/A 1) Parliament/Head of State (President)
2) Director General of FCAA (DGCA Finland) 3) Director of MAA 4) Commander of Finnish Air Force These provisions cover: These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT OAT/GAT Co-ordination Y OAT/GAT Co-ordination ATCO Training Y ATCO Training ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing ANSP Certification Y ANSP Certification ANSP Supervision Y ANSP Supervision
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 19 Released Issue Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability Aircrew Licensing Y Additional Information: The Finnish Aviation Act is binding Additional Information: for all civil and military aviation in Finland. Based on the Aviation Act the MAA has the right to supplement aviation regulations with official directives to such an extent that is permitted by the applicable regulations. Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: about these provisions: National AIP N National AIP National Military AIP N National Military AIP EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP Other: Other:
Oversight
OAT GAT National oversight body for OAT: NSA NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: N/A
Service Provision role
OAT GAT Services Provided: Services Provided: En-Route N Civil ANSP (ANS Finland) En-Route N Approach/TMA N Civil ANSP (ANS Finland) Approach/TMA N Airfield/TWR/GND N Civil ANSP (ANS Finland) Airfield/TWR/GND N AIS N Civil ANSP (ANS Finland) AIS N MET N Finnish Meteorological Institute MET N SAR N Civil ANSP (ANS Finland) SAR N The Military assists civil ARSC on request TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS N Other: Other: N Additional Information: Additional Information: No GAT services provided by the Military
Military ANSP providing GAT N/A If YES, since: Duration of the services SES certified. Certificate: Certificate issued by: If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations?
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 20 Released Issue User role
IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT fly
If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing Within specific corridors only Within the regular (GAT) national route network Under radar control Within a special OAT route system Under radar advisory service
If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Provision of ATC in UHF CNS exemptions: RVSM 8.33 Mode S ACAS Others: Few Instrument Approach Procedures only for military aviation.
Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)
Military in Finland applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y FUA Level 1 implemented: Y FUA Level 2 implemented: Y FUA Level 3 implemented: Y
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 21 Released Issue 2. Traffic and Capacity
Evolution of traffic in Finland
Finland - Annual IFR Movements 300000 Finland - Distribution (Ref. year 2019)
250000 International Dep/Arr 60%
200000
150000 IFR flights
100000 IFR movements - Actuals IFR movements - Scenario 2 IFR movements - Scenario 1 50000 Overflights IFR movements - Scenario 3 22% Domestic flights 18% 0 2016 A 2017 A 2018 A 2019 A 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F 2024 F A = Actual
F = Forecast
EUROCONTROL Five-Year Forecast 2020-2024
IFR flights yearly growth 2017 A 2018 A 2019 A 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F 2024 F
Sc1 -58.9% 68.8% 20.5% 8.0% 6.5% Finland Sc2 6.4% 7.7% 0.8% -59.8% 16.1% 44.0% 14.1% 12.4% Sc3 -60.0% 13.4% 17.7% 15.3% 12.0% Sc1 -55.1% 61.9% 21.9% 8.9% 6.8% ECAC Sc2 4.0% 3.8% 0.8% -56.4% 16.6% 41.9% 14.1% 12.2% Sc3 -56.6% 14.5% 17.5% 14.8% 11.6%
2020
Traffic in Finland decreased by 59% in 2020 compared to 2019.
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 22 Released Issue ACC Helsinki
Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2016-2024
EFINACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
800 1.0
0.9 700
0.8 600 0.7
500 0.6
400 0.5 IFR flightsIFR (Daily Average)
0.4 300 Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) 0.3 200 0.2
100 0.1
0 0.0 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Peak Day Traffic 590 646 657 675 661 Summer Traffic 451 483 528 545 151 Yearly Traffic 451 486 533 546 234 Summer Traffic Forecast 368 450 487 513 Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 performance
Traffic evolution (2020 vs 2019) En-route Delay (min. per flight) Helsinki ACC Actual Traffic All reasons
Year -57% 0.00
Summer -72% 0.00
Summer 2020 performance assessment The average delay per flight was zero in Summer 2020.
Operational actions Achieved Comments Removal of ATS routes Yes LARA implementation No Postponed to June 2021 DAPS, OLDI update with ULLL FIR (Transfer messages) Yes DAPS expected February 2021 WAM area A, Mode-S, PENS network No WAM and Mode S expected February 2021
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 23 Released Issue Planning Period – Summer 2021
2021 Summer Capacity Plan
Free Route Airspace Airspace Management Removal of TSA areas (TRA concept). Re-design of MIL daily operational areas. LARA June Advanced FUA 2021
Airport & TMA Network Integration
Cooperative Traffic Management
Airspace
Procedures
Staffing
Technical VCS update to VoIP, WAM, DAPS and Mode S Capacity Significant Events
Additional information
EFINCTA - May-October - Weekdays 5
4
3
2
1
0 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00
Nb sectors (std) Nb sectors (max)
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 24 Released Issue EFINCTA - May-October - Saturdays 5
4
3
2
1
0 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00
Nb sectors (std) Nb sectors (max)
EFINCTA - May-October - Sundays 5
4
3
2
1
0 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00
Nb sectors (std) Nb sectors (max)
Summer 2021 Outlook No capacity issues are foreseen for Helsinki ACC in Summer 2021.
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 25 Released Issue 3. Implementation Projects The tables below presents the high-level information about the main projects currently ongoing in Finland. The details of each project are available in Chapter 2 of the Level 2 - Detailed Implementation Status document.
National projects
Name of project Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Links
N/A
FAB projects
Name of project Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Links
SMS Harmonisation Fintraffic ANS, 2016-2021 Work in progress Link to EU IR: Avinor, EANS, LGS 373/2017
CNS Infrastructure Fintraffic ANS, 2018-2021 Work in progress FAB project rationalisation: Avinor, EANS, LGS Executing the PBN Implementation Plans
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 26 Released Issue
Multinational projects
Name of project Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Links
Borealis FRA ANS Finland, Avinor, 2015-2024 Work in progress AOM21.2 (Level 3) Implementation EANS, IAA, Isavia, LFV, (Part 2) LGS, NATS, Naviair, EUROCONTROL
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 27 Released Issue 4. Cooperation activities
FAB Co-ordination
FINEST
FINEST is a bilateral cooperation programme between Estonia EANS and Fintraffic ANS. responding to the demands of increased air traffic and Single European Sky requirements, EANS and Fintraffic ANS have decided to further strengthen their cooperation
The objective of the FINEST programme is a consistent, dynamic, cost-efficient and competitive cross-border Air Navigation Service (ANS) provision for the benefit of airspace users.
Both ANSPs are using similar but independent Thales TopSky system and In order to achieve the goals of FINEST, a joint Flight Data Processing System is required and under development.
Multinational cooperation initiatives
BOREALIS
Free Route Airspace (FRA) is one of the top priorities for airspace users within Europe and will mark a major step towards the Single European Sky (SES). The implementation of FRA allows airspace users to plan and fly their preferred route across the entire airspace managed by Borealis members saving time, fuel and money. It is a key element of ATM Functionality 3 (AF3 – Flexible Airspace Management and Free Route) defined in the Pilot Common Project for SESAR Deployment as well Common Project 1, regulation taking effect February 2021 and replacing & extending the Pilot Common Project.
Formed in 2012, the Borealis Alliance is an Alliance of the Air Navigation Service Providers of nine North European countries: Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Ireland, Latvia, Norway, Sweden and UK, six of which are EU Member States.
The Borealis is undertaking a programme to implement FRA across northern Europe, stretching from the eastern boundary of the North Atlantic to the western boundary of Russian airspace in the North of Europe. The nine members of the Borealis Alliance controlled before the COVID-19 more than 10,000 flights a day, that’s over 3.8 million flights a year, across 12.5 million km2 of North European airspace. That was 38% of all flights in Europe.
NAMCON (Northern Europe Aviation Meteorology Consortium)
National Meteorological Services (NMS) of Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway and Sweden, as the designated MET service providers for aeronautical meteorological forecasts, launched the NAMCON co-operation in 2011 and these equal partners have worked actively together to support SES targets. The consortium co-operates with NEFAB and DK-SE FAB.
NAMCON’s mission since the beginning has been to improve efficiency, reliability and access to aviation weather products and services for airspace users in Northern Europe.
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 28 Released Issue Co-operation inside NAMCON includes e.g. cross-border joint production, shared production systems, harmonized MET products and OPS manuals and consolidated work on research and development to fulfill future user needs. Joint NAMCON work is also ongoing regarding compliance matters.
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 29 Released Issue 5. Implementation Objectives Progress
State View: Overall Objective Implementation Progress
The graph below shows progress for all Implementation Objectives (applicable and not applicable to the State).
7; [12%]
4; [7%] Completed 22; [39%] Ongoing
5; [9%] Planned Late
4; [7%] Not yet planned Not Applicable
15; [26%]
Summary of the implementation of the objectives
Finland is late in implementing Objectives AOM13.1, COM10, INF07, ITY-ACID and ITY-ADQ. Regarding AOM13.1, implementation is planned for the year 2021. Regarding COM10, basic AMHS was implemented in 2010 but delays involved in various project phases for extended AMHS have delayed full implementation; full implementation is expected to take place by the end of 2021. Regarding INF07, a project group consisting of all relevant stakeholders has been established to create the National TOD Policy and implementation programme. Drafting of implementation programme is in progress. Regarding ITY-ACID, the operational use of ACID is planned to happen countrywide step- by-step by the end of 2022 when the WAM and Mode-S sensors will cover entire Helsinki FIR. Regarding ITYADQ, implementation of most of the requirements of this objective have been postponed until the end of 2021. Requirement to Implement all data requirements is for seen to be challenging to meet.
Other applicable objects are planned to be implemented according to the FOC dates.
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 30 Released Issue Objective Progress per SESAR Essential Operational Changes
Legend:
100% = Objective completed = Implementation Objective timeline (to FOC date)
## % = Expected completion / % Progress = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline
<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS 78 %
COM11.1 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in En- 40 % Route
COM11.2 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in 40 % Airport/Terminal
ITY-ACID Aircraft Identification 75 %
ITY-AGDL Initial ATC Air-Ground Data Link Services 100 %
ITY-AGVCS2 8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Channel Spacing 72 % below FL195
ITY-SPI Surveillance Performance and 100 % Interoperability
NAV10 RNP Approach Procedures to instrument 70 % RWY
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 31 Released Issue <17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and 65 % General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling
COM12 New Pan-European Network Service 100 % (NewPENS)
FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning 100 %
FCM04.2 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) - 10 % Phase 2
FCM05 Interactive Rolling NOP 40 %
FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment 10 %
INF08.1 Information Exchanges using the SWIM 1 % Yellow TI Profile
<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) 16 %
ITY-ADQ Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and 40 % Aeronautical Information
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 32 Released Issue <17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
AOP14 Remote Tower Services
EFKE - KEMI-TORNIO 0 %
<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
AOP04.1 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A-SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1)
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport 100 %
AOP04.2 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2)
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport 100 %
AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A- CDM)
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport 100 %
AOP15 Enhanced traffic situational awareness and airport safety nets for the vehicle drivers
EFVA - VAASA 0 %
AOP16 Guidance assistance through airfield ground lighting
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport 0 %
AOP18 Runway Status Lights (RWSL)
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport 0 %
ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport 100 %
ATC19 Enhanced AMAN-DMAN integration 0 %
ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO)
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport 82 %
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 33 Released Issue ENV02 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport 100 %
ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO)
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport 100 %
NAV03.1 RNAV 1 in TMA Operations 81 %
NAV03.2 RNP 1 in TMA Operations 0 %
SAF11 Improve Runway Safety by Preventing 100 % Runway Excursions
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 34 Released Issue <17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
AOM19.1 ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced 53 % FUA (AFUA)
AOM19.2 ASM Management of Real-Time Airspace 52 % Data
AOM19.3 Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM 58 % Information Sharing
AOM19.4 Management of Pre-defined Airspace 10 % Configurations
ATC12.1 Automated Support for Conflict Detection, 78 % Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring
ATC15.1 Information Exchange with En-route in 100 % Support of AMAN
ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance 100 % to Controller during Coordination and Transfer
ATC18 Multi-Sector Planning En-route - 1P2T 0 %
ITY-FMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol 100 % (FMTP)
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 35 Released Issue <17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
ATC02.8 Ground-Based Safety Nets 100 %
ATC02.9 Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs 100 %
ATC20 Enhanced STCA with down-linked 30 % parameters via Mode S EHS
<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
NAV12 ATS IFR Routes for Rotorcraft Operations 0 %
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 36 Released Issue ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress
The following tables show, for each of the ASBU Elements belonging to a particular ASBU Thread and Block, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle.
These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2020 declared statuses and progress of the relevant implementation objectives in accordance with the initial mapping between ATM Master Plan Level 3 and new ICAO GANP 6th Edition (2019), as reflected in the Implementation Plan 2020. A comprehensive analysis performed as part of the ongoing ICAO EURGANT Project Team activity may result in updating the mapping following EASPG approval.
Legend:
= Completed (during 2020 or before) = Missing planning date = Progress achieved in 2020 = Not applicable
ACAS
<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
ACAS-B1/1 ACAS Improvements 100 %
ACDM
<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
ACDM-B0/2 Integration with ATM Network function 100 %
AMET
<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
AMET-B2/4 Meteorological information service in SWIM 100 % 1.0 %
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 37 Released Issue APTA
<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
APTA-B0/1 PBN Approaches (with basic capabilities) 100 % 70.0 % APTA-B0/2 PBN SID and STAR procedures (with basic 100 % capabilities) 81.0 % APTA-B0/4 CDO (Basic) 100 % 82.0 % APTA-B0/5 CCO (Basic) 100 %
APTA-B0/6 PBN Helicopter Point in Space (PinS) 100% Operations 0.0 % APTA-B1/1 PBN Approaches (with advanced 100 % capabilities) 70.0 % APTA-B1/2 PBN SID and STAR procedures (with No Plan advanced capabilities)
ASUR
<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
ASUR-B0/1 Automatic Dependent Surveillance 100 % Broadcast (ADS-B)
ASUR-B0/3 Cooperative Surveillance Radar Downlink of 100 % Aircraft Parameters (SSR-DAPS)
COMI
<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
COMI-B0/4 VHF Data Link (VDL) Mode 2 Basic 100 %
COMI-B0/7 ATS Message Handling System (AMHS) 100 % 78.0 % COMI-B1/1 Ground-Ground Aeronautical 100 % Telecommunication Network/Internet Protocol Suite (ATN/IPS)
COMI-B1/2 VHF Data Link (VDL) Mode 2 Multi- 100 % Frequency
COMI-B2/1 Air-Ground ATN/IPS 100 % 40.0 %
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 38 Released Issue DAIM
<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
DAIM-B1/3 Provision of digital terrain data sets 100 % 16.0 % DAIM-B1/4 Provision of digital obstacle data sets 100 % 16.0 % DAIM-B2/1 Dissemination of aeronautical information in 100 % a SWIM environment 1.0 %
FICE
<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
FICE-B0/1 Automated basic inter facility data exchange 100 % (AIDC)
FRTO
<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
FRTO-B0/2 Airspace planning and Flexible Use of 100 % Airspace (FUA) 53.0 % FRTO-B1/1 Free Route Airspace (FRA) 100 %
FRTO-B1/3 Advanced Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) and 100 % management of real time airspace data 55.0 % FRTO-B1/4 Dynamic sectorization 100 % 10.0 % FRTO-B1/5 Enhanced Conflict Detection Tools and 100 % Conformance Monitoring 78.0 % FRTO-B1/6 Multi-Sector Planning 100 % 0.0 %
NAVS
<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
NAVS-B0/2 Satellite Based Augmentation Systems 100 % (SBAS) 70.0 %
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 39 Released Issue NOPS
<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
NOPS-B0/2 Collaborative Network Flight Updates 100 %
NOPS-B0/4 Initial Airport/ATFM slots and A-CDM 100 % Network Interface
NOPS-B1/1 Short Term ATFM measures 100 % 10.0 % NOPS-B1/2 Enhanced Network Operations Planning 100 % 40.0 % NOPS-B1/4 Dynamic Traffic Complexity Management 100 % 10.0 % NOPS-B1/5 Full integration of airspace management 100 % with air traffic flow management 55.0 % NOPS-B1/6 Initial Dynamic Airspace configurations 100 % 10.0 %
RATS
<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
RATS-B1/1 Remotely Operated Aerodrome Air Traffic 100 % Services 0.0 %
RSEQ
<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
RSEQ-B0/1 Arrival Management 100 %
RSEQ-B0/2 Departure Management 100 %
RSEQ-B2/1 Integration of arrival and departure No Plan management
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 40 Released Issue SNET
<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
SNET-B0/1 Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) 100 %
SNET-B0/2 Minimum Safe Altitude Warning (MSAW) 100 %
SNET-B0/3 Area Proximity Warning (APW) 100 %
SNET-B0/4 Approach Path Monitoring (APM) 100 %
SNET-B1/1 Enhanced STCA with aircraft parameters 100 % 30.0 % SNET-B1/2 Enhanced STCA in complex TMAs 100 %
SURF
<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
SURF-B0/2 Comprehensive situational awareness of 100 % surface operations
SURF-B0/3 Initial ATCO alerting service for surface 100 % operations
SURF-B1/1 Advanced features using visual aids to No Plan support traffic management during ground operations
SURF-B2/2 Comprehensive vehicle driver situational No Plan awareness on the airport surface
SURF-B2/3 Conflict alerting for pilots for runway No Plan operations
SWIM
<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27
SWIM-B3/1 Air/Ground SWIM for safety critical 100 % information 1.0 %
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 41 Released Issue Detailed Objectives Implementation progress
Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: Completed Not yet planned Ongoing Not Applicable Planned Missing Data Late
Main Objectives
Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling AOM13.1 Timescales: 65% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 - Implementation is planned after the Aviation Act is updated. 31/12/2022 REG (By:12/2018) Aviation act revised in November 2014. Conformance Late analysis as a part of EUROAT implementation has been completed. FCAA - 40% EUROAT implementation and publication of Country 31/12/2022 Chapter can take place after the division of responsibilities as defined by the Aviation Act has been updated. Aviation law update in progress. Military Implementation will require changes to regulations Late - 40% Authority and/or legislation in co-operation with FCAA. 31/12/2022 ASP (By:12/2018) Implementation and training of staff planned for the Late ANS Finland year 2021, waiting for State airspace legislation up-date - 43% 31/12/2021 during 2021. MIL (By:12/2018) Military Implementation will require changes to regulations Completed - 100% Authority and/or legislation possibly in co-operation with FCAA. 31/12/2015
ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA (AFUA) Timescales: AOM19.1 53% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - Existing tool will be replaced by LARA and PRISMIL by 30/03/2021 30/06/2021 ASP (By:01/2022) Existing tool will be replaced by LARA and PRISMIL by Ongoing ANS Finland - 53% 30/03/2021 30/06/2021
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 42 Released Issue ASM Management of Real-Time Airspace Data Timescales: AOM19.2 52% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - LARA & PRISMIL connection to TopSky ATC-system planned by 30/03/2021 FOC 30/06/2021 ASP (By:01/2022) LARA & PRISMIL connection to TopSky ATC-system Ongoing ANS Finland - 52% planned by 30/03/2021 FOC 30/06/2021
Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing Timescales: AOM19.3 58% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - LARA connection to TopSky ATC-system and full MIL-connectivity planned by 30/06/2021, 30/06/2021 enabling AOM19.3 requirements before required FOC date 01/01/2022. ASP (By:01/2022) LARA connection to TopSky ATC-system and full MIL- Ongoing ANS Finland connectivity planned by 30/06/2021, enabling AOM19.3 - 58% 30/06/2021 requirements
Management of Pre-defined Airspace Configurations Timescales: AOM19.4 10% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - Heading for FOC 31/12/2021 31/12/2021 ASP (By:01/2022) Ongoing ANS Finland Heading for FOC 31/12/2021 - 10% 31/12/2021
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 43 Released Issue Free Route Airspace Timescales: AOM21.2 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - NEFAB wide continuous FRA 7/24 was implemented 12th Nov 2015, in the Finnish airspace covering airspace from FL095 to FL660. 12/11/2015 Further North European multi FAB FRA Borealis was 2020 under final construction. ASP (By:01/2022) Borealis FRA Completed Implementa tion (Part 2) / Borealis FRA Part 2, Phase 1 / Borealis FRA Part 2, NEFAB wide continuous FRA 7/24 was implemented Phase 2 / 12th Nov 2015, in the Finnish airspace covering airspace Borealis ANS Finland from FL095 to FL660. Free Route 100% 12/11/2015 Further North European multi FAB FRA Borealis was Airspace 2020 under final construction. (Part 1) / NEFAB FRA / NEFAB Target Concept / NEFRA Phase 1 / NEFRA Phase 2
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A-SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) AOP04.1 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 01/01/2021 EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport A-SMGCS Level 1 implemented in 2011. 31/03/2011 REG (By:12/2010) Completed FCAA A-SMGCS Level 1 implemented in 2011. - 100% 31/03/2011 ASP (By:01/2021) A-SMGCS Level 1 implemented in 2011. Currently EFHK Completed has got A-SMGCS Level 2 with 3 SMR-s and Mode S ANS Finland - 100% Multilateration System. Systems fulfill agreed 31/03/2011 performance specifications and are in operational use APO (By:01/2021) HELSINKI- Completed VANTAA A-SMGCS Level 1 implemented in 2011. - 100% 31/03/2011 Airport
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 44 Released Issue Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A- SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) AOP04.2 100% Completed Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 01/01/2021 EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport Helsinki-Vantaa Airport A-SMGCS-system fulfills ETSI EN 303 213-1 v1.1.1 and ETSI EN 303 213-1 v1.2.1 specifications being A-SMGCS Level 2 compatible. That includes also runway incursion 15/01/2018 and monitoring logic which were completed and operational in mid Jan 2018 ASP (By:01/2021) Helsinki-Vantaa Airport A-SMGCS-system fulfills ETSI EN Completed 303 213-1 v1.1.1 and ETSI EN 303 213-1 v1.2.1 ANS Finland specifications being A-SMGCS Level 2 compatible. That - 100% 15/01/2018 includes also runway incursion and monitoring logic which were completed and operational in mid Jan 2018 APO (By:01/2021) The equipment installed is a Mode S-based vehicle Completed transponder with GPS-receiver. HELSINKI- Helsinki-Vantaa Airport A-SMGCS-system fulfills ETSI EN VANTAA 303 213-1 v1.1.1 and ETSI EN 303 213-1 v1.2.1 - 100% 30/06/2010 Airport specifications being A-SMGCS Level 2 compatible. That includes also runway incursion and monitoring logic which were completed and operational in mid Jan 2018
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Timescales: AOP05 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 01/01/2021 EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport CDM was implemented at Helsinki-Vantaa in 2012 31/12/2012 ASP (By:01/2021) Completed ANS Finland CDM was implemented at Helsinki-Vantaa in 2012 - 100% 31/12/2012 APO (By:01/2021) HELSINKI- Completed VANTAA CDM was implemented in 2012. - 100% 31/12/2012 Airport
Time-Based Separation Not AOP10 Timescales: 0% Applicable - not applicable - EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Not applicable - REG (By:01/2024) Not FCAA - - 0% Applicable - ASP (By:01/2024) Not ANS Finland - - 0% Applicable -
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 45 Released Issue Initial Airport Operations Plan Not AOP11 Timescales: 0% Applicable - not applicable - EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Not applicable - ASP (By:01/2021) Not ANS Finland - - 0% Applicable - APO (By:01/2021) HELSINKI- Not VANTAA - - 0% Applicable Airport -
Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers Not AOP12 (CMAC) 0% Applicable Timescales: - not applicable - EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Not applicable - ASP (By:01/2021) Not ANS Finland - - 0% Applicable - APO (By:01/2021) HELSINKI- Not VANTAA - - 0% Applicable Airport -
Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing Not AOP13 0% Timescales: Applicable - not applicable - EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) EFHK is a non PCP airport - REG (By:01/2024) Not Applicability Area: FCAA - 0% Applicable 25 PCP Airports - ASP (By:01/2024) Not ANS Finland - - 0% Applicable -
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 46 Released Issue Ground-Based Safety Nets Timescales: ATC02.8 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - Ground systems upgraded to support the APW function. MSAW processing is included in operational systems (EUROCAT). 31/10/2012 APM was implemented in 2012. ASP (By:01/2022) Ground systems upgraded to support the APW function. Completed MSAW processing is included in operational systems ANS Finland - 100% (EUROCAT). 31/10/2012 APM was implemented in 2012.
Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs Timescales: ATC02.9 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 - STCA in use for several years, plans for major changes not foreseen in near future but 01/01/1999 continuous tuning is done in order to enhance the function ASP (By:12/2020) Completed ANS Finland - - 100% 01/01/1999
AMAN Tools and Procedures Timescales: ATC07.1 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 01/01/2020 EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport Several versions of arrival Management Tools have been implemented in ACC and APP. 30/11/2005 ASP (By:01/2020) Initial arrival management tool functionality is Completed completed since 1999 for Tampere ACC and Helsinki APP, using same equipment (MAESTRO) as in ANS Finland - 100% Copenhagen / Malmo. In 2005, an integrated Arrival 30/11/2005 Manager functionality has been implemented within the adjacent Helsinki / Tallinn TMAs.
Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring ATC12.1 Timescales: 78% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - Original ATC12 Completed, additional ATC12.1 functionality planned and project ongoing 31/12/2021 according to the ESSIP object, taking into account NEFAB and NEFRA FRA-airspace needs. ASP (By:01/2022) Original ATC12 Completed, additional ATC12.1 Ongoing functionality planned and project ongoing according to ANS Finland - 78% the ESSIP object, taking into account NEFAB and NEFRA 31/12/2021 FRA-airspace needs.
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 47 Released Issue Information Exchange with En-route in Support of AMAN Timescales: ATC15.1 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2019 - Completed in the year 2000, this feature is included in the Helsinki-Vantaa Maestro system. 31/12/2000 ASP (By:12/2019) Completed in the year 2000, this feature is included in Completed ANS Finland - 100% the Helsinki-Vantaa Maestro system. 31/12/2000
Arrival Management Extended to En-route Airspace
Not ATC15.2 (Outside Applicability Area) 0% Applicable Timescales: - not applicable - - There is no such airport in Finland which would require extended AMAN for surrounding ACC(s). Finland FIR belongs in the affected airspace from the point of Stockholm Arlanda airport. No - initiative has been raised by Arlanda towards Finland FIR and thus Finland has no plan for this issue. ASP (By:01/2024) There is no such airport in Finland which would require Not extended AMAN for surrounding ACC(s). Applicable Finland FIR belongs in the affected airspace from the ANS Finland - 0% point of Stockholm Arlanda airport. No initiative has - been raised by Arlanda towards Finland FIR and thus Finland has no plan for this issue.
Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer ATC17 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - Fully completed and operational between Finland-Estonia 6/2014 30/06/2014 ASP (By:01/2022) Fully completed and operational between Finland- Completed ANS Finland - 100% Estonia 6/2014 30/06/2014
Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: COM10 78% Late Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 - Basic AMHS was implemented in 2010, extended AMHS is under construction, FoC planned to 31/03/2021 be Q1/2021 ASP (By:12/2018) Basic AMHS was implemented in 2010, extended AMHS Late ANS Finland - 78% is under construction, FoC planned to be Q1/2021 31/03/2021
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 48 Released Issue Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in En-Route Timescales: COM11.1 40% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - This objective is expected to be implemented within the given time frame though schedule- risks has been risen due to commercial complaints against selected manufacturer and a new 30/05/2021 tendering process is now needed ASP (By:01/2022) This objective is expected to be implemented by Ongoing ANS Finland - 40% Q3/2021 30/05/2021
Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in Airport/Terminal Timescales: COM11.2 40% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 - - 31/05/2021 ASP (By:12/2023) Planned FoC 31.12.2023 for all airports, however, Ongoing ANS Finland - 40% Helsinki-Vantaa airport FoC 30/08/2021. 31/05/2021
New Pan-European Network Service (NewPENS) Timescales: COM12 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability (33 ANSPs): 01/01/2025 - - 31/12/2019 ASP (By:01/2025) All connections except EAD has been connected through Completed ANS Finland NewPENS. EAD planned Q1/2020, so the task is - 100% 31/12/2019 classified as completed. APO (By:01/2025) HELSINKI- Not VANTAA ANS Finland is representing Helsinki-Vantaa Airport. - 0% Applicable Airport -
Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: ENV01 82% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport The CDA procedures are in use. Their usage is continuously monitored by the Environmental 31/12/2022 Unit of Finavia. ASP (By:12/2023) The CDA procedures are in use. Their usage is Ongoing ANS Finland continuously monitored by the Environmental Unit of - 78% 31/12/2022 Finavia. APO (By:12/2023) HELSINKI- The CDA procedures are in use. Their usage is Completed VANTAA continuously monitored by the Environmental Unit of - 100% 31/12/2009 Airport Finavia.
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 49 Released Issue Collaborative Flight Planning Timescales: FCM03 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - Functionality installed and available BUT problems so far at NM within automatically processing and firmly specifying the use of AFP-messages in the Free Route Airspace environment causes that full FoC implementation of collaborative flight planning is estimated to take place not before year 2021. 31/12/2012
Though all functionality has been installed according to spec, the interoperability between Thales TopSky and NM system has not been achieved due to complicated FRA operations environment, not fully covered at NM. ASP (By:01/2022) Functionality installed and available BUT problems so far Completed at NM within automatically processing and firmly specifying the use of AFP-messages in the Free Route Airspace environment causes that full FoC implementation of collaborative flight planning is ANS Finland estimated to take place not before year 2021. - 100% 31/12/2012
Though all functionality has been installed according to spec, the interoperability between Thales TopSky and NM system has not been achieved due to complicated FRA operations environment, not fully covered at NM.
Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) - Phase 2 Timescales: FCM04.2 10% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - STAM2 will be based on NM services. Implementation possible only if NM support is available. 31/12/2021 ASP (By:01/2022) STAM2 will be based on NM services. Implementation Ongoing ANS Finland - 10% possible only if NM support is available. 31/12/2021
Interactive Rolling NOP Timescales: FCM05 40% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - Project exist to implement the interactive rolling NOP. INEA funding is under progress, within 31/12/2021 the scope of SESAR Deployment Programme 2015. ASP (By:01/2022) Plans exist to implement the rolling NOP. Intention is to Ongoing ANS Finland implement the full integration of AOP with the NOP by - 10% 31/12/2021 31/12/2021 APO (By:01/2022) HELSINKI- Plans exist to implement the rolling NOP. Intention is to Ongoing VANTAA implement the full integration of AOP with the NOP by - 70% 31/12/2021 Airport 31/12/2021
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 50 Released Issue Traffic Complexity Assessment Timescales: FCM06 10% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - Planned according to objective FOC. 31/12/2021 ASP (By:01/2022) Ongoing ANS Finland Negotiations ongoing with system provider. - 10% 31/12/2021
Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) Timescales: INF07 16% Late Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 01/01/2019 - Planning in progress. The objective is expected to be completed by the end of 2021. 31/12/2022 REG (By:01/2019) A project group consisting of all relevant stakeholders Late has been established to create the National TOD Policy FCAA - 23% and implementation programme. Drafting of 31/12/2022 implementation programme is in progress. ASP (By:01/2019) Late ANS Finland Waiting for national TOD policy to be finalized. - 10% 31/12/2021 APO (By:01/2019) Project is in progress. Late The roadmap will be done after the New Finnish HELSINKI- Aeronautical Spatial Information management model VANTAA will be published. - 10% 27/01/2022 Airport Finavia will comply with the Finnish Aeronautical Spatial Information management model to be in use by the end of 2021.
Information Exchanges using the SWIM Yellow TI Profile Timescales: INF08.1 1% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 01/01/2025 - Planned FOC by 31/12/2024 31/12/2024 ASP (By:01/2025) Planned ANS Finland Planned FOC by 31/12/2024 - 0% 31/12/2024 Finnish Ongoing Meteorologi Planned FOC by 31/12/2024 - 10% 31/12/2024 cal Institute MIL (By:01/2025) Not Military MIL has no ANSP/AIS -role. - 0% Applicable Authority - APO (By:01/2025) HELSINKI- Planned VANTAA Planned FOC by 31/12/2024 - 0% 31/12/2024 Airport
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 51 Released Issue Aircraft Identification Timescales: ITY-ACID 75% Late Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020 - ACID capability is technically ready for ATM system TopSky (DAPs, Downlink Aircraft Parameters). Operational use of DAPs is pending due to missing Mode S surveillance sensors. Project(s) to achieve country wide Mode S surveillance coverage is in progress. Coverage is achieved via Mode S radars and WAM systems. 30/06/2022 First WAM system (southwest of Finland) and four upgraded Mode S radars will be commissioned during Q2/2021 providing Mode S surveillance to most of the Finland FIR. Remaining coverage will be achieved with a WAM system covering the northern Finland (estimated commissioning Q2/2022). ASP (By:01/2020) ACID capability is technically ready for ATM system Late TopSky (DAPs, Downlink Aircraft Parameters). Operational use of DAPs is pending due to missing Mode S surveillance sensors. Project(s) to achieve country wide Mode S surveillance coverage is in progress. Coverage is achieved via Mode S radars and WAM systems. ANS Finland - 75% 30/06/2022 First WAM system (southwest of Finland) and four upgraded Mode S radars will be commissioned during Q2/2021 providing Mode S surveillance to most of the Finland FIR. Remaining coverage will be achieved with a WAM system covering the northern Finland (estimated commissioning Q2/2022).
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 52 Released Issue Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information Timescales: Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: ITY-ADQ 40% Late 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017 - Most of the requirements of this objective have been postponed until forecasted FoC 12/2021. Requirement to Implement all data requirements is for seen to be challenging to meet. It 31/12/2021 requires actions from data originators, which are not completely under control of ANSP. Based on the other state experience it takes 4-5 years. REG (By:06/2017) The requirements of this objective have been extremely Late FCAA challenging to meet, it is estimated that implementation - 62% 31/12/2021 will not take place until 12/2021. ASP (By:06/2017) ANS Finland has started FAIMS project, covering the ITY- Late ADQ requirements, planned implementation by Q3/2021. System fulfills ADQ requirements for aeronautical ANS Finland - 53% information management and production of AIP. It also 31/08/2021 provides data origination tools for other parties. However, the other parties are not directly involved in the FAIMS project. APO (By:06/2017) Finavia has started new project to meet the Late requirements. HELSINKI- Finavia’s new project will meet the requirements to VANTAA implement data quality, evidence, origination, process, - 10% 31/12/2021 Airport error reporting and rectification requirements. Finavia is planning to meet requirements inside airport boundaries terrain and obstacles.
Initial ATC Air-Ground Data Link Services Timescales: ITY-AGDL Entry into force: 06/02/2009 100% Completed ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020 - Both, SITA and ARINC networks and CSP-services are in place, tested and in operational use 01/01/2019 (ARINC in December 2020) REG (By:02/2018) ANS Finland has informed 24.11.2017 delays to SESAR Completed Deployment Manager (SDM) concerning the installation FCAA delays. Relevant information in the national - 100% 31/12/2018 aeronautical information publication will be published by ANS Finland. ASP (By:02/2018) Both, SITA and ARINC networks and CSP-services are in Completed ANS Finland place, tested and in operational use (ARINC in December - 100% 31/12/2018 2020) MIL (By:01/2019) Military 25% of transport-type State aircraft have been Completed - 100% Authority equipped. No intention/plan for further updates. 01/01/2019
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 53 Released Issue 8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 Timescales: Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 ITY-AGVCS2 72% Completed Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020 - Finland has notified the European Commission of temporary derogations from Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1079/2012 on 12.12.2016. The Finnish Transport Safety 31/12/2027 Agency grants exemptions from the requirements in Articles 4(5) 31.12.2027, 5(4) 1.1.2028 and 6(10) 31.12.2028. Approval of derogations from commission by letter received 08/08/2018. REG (By:12/2018) The requirements have been implemented within the Completed FCAA - 100% timeframe of the notification to the EC. 31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2018) ITY-AGVCS2: 8,33 kHz radio-ready 100 % at Q1/2019, Completed ANS Finland - 78% FOC gradually by 12/2027 as granted by Regulator. 31/12/2027 MIL (By:12/2020) Military All aircraft that will be in use after implementation date Completed - 100% Authority are equipped with 8,33kHz radios. 31/12/2017 APO (By:12/2018) HELSINKI- Late ITY-AGVCS2: 8,33 kHz radio-ready 100 % at Q1/2019, VANTAA - 5% FOC gradually by 12/2027 as granted by Regulator. 31/12/2027 Airport
Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 ITY-FMTP 100% Completed All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014 - - 30/03/2020 ASP (By:12/2014) Completed ANS Finland - - 100% 30/03/2020 MIL (By:12/2014) Not Military Integrated civil-military airspace. Military has no service - 0% Applicable Authority provision role in Finnish aviation. -
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 54 Released Issue Surveillance Performance and Interoperability Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 ITY-SPI 100% Completed EHS and ADS-B Out in transport-type State aircraft : 07/12/2020 ELS in transport-type State aircraft : 07/12/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/12/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/12/2020 - The existing surveillance chain has been operational for years and the safety assessment have been completed. All REG and ASP SloAs are completed. Remaining SloAs will be completed 31/12/2018 within the timeframe of the regulation. REG (By:02/2015) The existing surveillance chain has been operational for Completed FCAA - 100% years and the safety assessment have been completed. 31/12/2014 ASP (By:02/2015) The existing surveillance chain has been operational for Completed ANS Finland - 100% years and the safety assessment have been completed. 31/12/2014 MIL (By:12/2020) MIL has no role in ANSP/surveillance capability issues. Completed Military All transport type aircraft have MODE S and ADS-B OUT - 100% Authority 31/12/2018 -capabilities.
RNAV 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: NAV03.1 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 81% Ongoing One SID and STAR per instrument RWY, where established: 25/01/2024 All SIDs and STARs per instrument RWY, where established: 06/06/2030 - RNAV 1 SIDs and STARs procedures have been implemented in most airports in Helsinki FIR. 30/06/2021 REG (By:06/2030) Traficom published national navigation and surveillance Ongoing strategy 2019-2030, which include PBN. ANSP is FCAA currently preparing PBN-transition plan and - 10% 30/06/2021 implementation plan. Target date for authority approval of the PBN-transition plan is end of June 2021. ASP (By:06/2030) All published TMA RNAV SID and RNAV STAR procedures Ongoing are according to RNAV 1 ANS Finland - 91% DME/DME or GNSS for Helsinki-Vantaa TMA, GNSS only 30/06/2021 for others
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 55 Released Issue RNP 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: Start: 07/08/2018 Not yet NAV03.2 0% All SIDs and STARs per instrument RWY, at PCP airports: 25/01/2024 planned One SID and STAR per instrument RWY, where established: 25/01/2024 All SIDs and STARs per instrument RWY, where established: 06/06/2030 - - - REG (By:06/2030) Not yet FCAA - - 0% planned - ASP (By:06/2030) Not yet ANS Finland Planned but FoC date is not known. - 0% planned -
RNP Approach Procedures to instrument RWY Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Instrument RWY ends without precision approach in EU SES States, at NAV10 Non-PCP airports: 03/12/2020 70% Ongoing Instrument RWY ends served by precision approach (including PCP airports): 25/01/2024 Instrument RWY ends without precision approach in EU SES States, at PCP airports: 25/01/2024 - - 31/12/2021 REG (By:01/2024) Finland applies criteria published by EASA. Specifically, Ongoing AMC 20-26 and AMC 20-27. Traficom published national navigation and surveillance strategy 2019-2030, which FCAA include PBN. ANSP is currently preparing PBN-transition - 55% 30/06/2021 plan and implementation plan. Target date for authority approval of the PBN-transition plan is end of November 2020. ASP (By:01/2024) 83% of RWYs served by precision approach (LNAV, Ongoing ANS Finland - 75% LNAV/VNAV and LPV). 100 % by 31/12/2021 31/12/2021
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 56 Released Issue ATS IFR Routes for Rotorcraft Operations Timescales: Rotorcraft RNP0.3, RNP1 or RNAV1 ATS routes above FL150, where established.: 03/12/2020 One rotorcraft RNP0.3, RNP01 or RNAV1 SID and STAR per instrument NAV12 0% Planned RWY, where established.: 25/01/2024 Rotorcraft RNP0.3, RNP1 or RNAV1 ATS routes below FL150, where established.: 25/01/2024 All rotorcraft RNP0.3, RNP01 or RNAV1 SIDs and STARs per instrument RWY, where established.: 06/06/2030 - National planning should start by Q4/2020 06/06/2030 REG (By:06/2030) Planned FCAA - - 0% 31/12/2024 ASP (By:06/2030) Planned ANS Finland - - 0% 06/06/2030
Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions Timescales: SAF11 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018 - Finland is compliant with the relevant parts of EAPPRE. 31/12/2015 REG (By:01/2018) The appropriate parts of the European Action Plan for Completed FCAA the Prevention of Runway Excursions have been - 100% 31/12/2015 implemented utilising the Finnish Aviation Safety Plan. ASP (By:12/2014) Completed ANS Finland Requirements fulfilled during 2014. - 100% 31/12/2014 APO (By:12/2014) MIL has no service provision/APO role. Applicable Completed Military measures of the action plan concerning aircraft - 100% Authority 31/12/2014 operators have been implemented. HELSINKI- Completed VANTAA Requirements fulfilled during 2014. - 100% 31/12/2014 Airport
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 57 Released Issue Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring
Direct Routing
Not AOM21.1 (Outside Applicability Area) 0% Applicable Timescales: - not applicable - - NEFAB wide continues FRA 7/24 was implemented 12th Nov 2015, in the Finnish airspace - covering airspace from FL95 to FL660. ASP (By:12/2017) Not ANS Finland - - 0% Applicable -
Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 for en-route operations ATC02.2 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013 - Implemented in 2012. 30/04/2012 ASP (By:01/2013) Completed ANS Finland Implemented in 2012 - 100% 30/04/2012
Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: ATC16 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 - The requirements stemming from Regulation (EU) No 1332/2011 of 16 December 2011 laying down common airspace 31/12/2015 usage requirements and operating procedures for airborne collision avoidance have been implemented in Finland. REG (By:12/2015) Completed FCAA All REG SloA's are completed. - 100% 31/12/2015 ASP (By:03/2012) Training completed in 2012. ACAS performance Completed ANS Finland - 100% monitoring has been in place since 2008. 31/05/2012 MIL (By:12/2015) Transport type -aircraft equipped with TCAS II 7.0 or Completed Military TCAS I. No update planned. ACAS II functionalities are - 100% Authority 31/03/2012 trained during flight cadets training for tactical aircraft.
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 58 Released Issue Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: FCM01 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006 - Objective has been completed. 30/11/2010 ASP (By:07/2014) Completed ANS Finland Completed 2010 - 100% 30/11/2010
Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes Timescales: Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and ITY-COTR initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 100% Completed For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 - The system requirements derived from the regulations 1032/2006 and 30/2009 are expected to 30/12/2012 be finalized within the timeframe of the regulations. ASP (By:12/2012) Planned according to the regulations (1032/2006, Completed ANS Finland - 100% 29/2009 and 30/2009). 30/12/2012 MIL (By:12/2012) Not Military Integrated civil-military airspace. Military has no service - 0% Applicable Authority provision role in Finnish aviation. -
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 59 Released Issue Local Objectives
Remote Tower Services AOP14 0% Planned Applicability and timescale: Local EFKE - KEMI-TORNIO The development and planning phase of Multiple Remote Operated Towers for several aerodromes ATS has been conducted. Further steps will be based on decisions made by airport 31/12/2023 operator, KEMI-TORNIO airport is mentioned as an example.
Enhanced traffic situational awareness and airport safety nets for the AOP15 vehicle drivers 0% Planned Applicability and timescale: Local EFVA - VAASA EFVA is only an example and this item will be implemented to several or all network airports in 31/12/2024 Finland. One version is on test in Vaasa Airport.
Guidance assistance through airfield ground lighting Not yet AOP16 0% Applicability and timescale: Local planned EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport On consideration, but no plan yet. -
Provision/integration of departure planning information to NMOC Not AOP17 % Applicability and timescale: Local Applicable EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport Level 2 A-CDM completed 2012. -
Runway Status Lights (RWSL) Not yet AOP18 0% Applicability and timescale: Local planned EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport On consideration, but not yet planned. -
Multi-Sector Planning En-route - 1P2T ATC18 0% Planned Applicability and timescale: Local - Under investigation, feasibility study ongoing whether a project should be initiated 31/12/2023
Enhanced AMAN-DMAN integration Not yet ATC19 0% Applicability and timescale: Local planned - No actual plan so far -
Enhanced STCA with down-linked parameters via Mode S EHS ATC20 30% Ongoing Applicability and timescale: Local - WAM area A will be operational Q2/2021, B and C areas by Q1/2022. 31/12/2021 Local MSSRs are being upgraded with mode-S capability by 06/2021
Airport Collaborative Environmental Management ENV02 100% Completed Applicability and timescale: Local EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport Finavia's co-operation with operators is continuous. Procedures are planned according to 31/12/2012 environmental etc. demands.
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) ENV03 100% Completed Applicability and timescale: Local EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport Approximately 70% of departures are CCO 31/12/2020
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 60 Released Issue 6. Annexes
A. Specialists involved in the ATM implementation reporting for Finland
LSSIP Co-ordination
LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name
LSSIP National Focal Point Finnish Transport and Jouko RANTA Communications Agency Traficom LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA Finnish Transport and Jouko RANTA Communications Agency Traficom LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP Fintraffic Air Navigation Pekka VIRTANEN and Iiro Services Ltd KESKIVÄLI LSSIP Focal Point for Airport Finavia Corporation Heikki ISOMAA LSSIP Focal Point for Military Military Aviation Authority Heikki KUORELAHTI and Timo VÄHÄMÄKI LSSIP Focal Point for MET SP Finnish Meteorological Institute Lea SAUKKONEN and Terhi NIKKANEN
Other Focal Points Organisation Name
Focal Point for NETSYS Fintraffic Air Navigation Jari TOIVONEN Services Ltd EASA - EPAS Focal Point Finnish Transport and Heli KOIVU Communications Agency Traficom EDA Focal Point Air Force Command Finland Janne MÄYRÄ Performance Focal Point Finnish Transport and Päivi PALOKANGAS Communications Agency Traficom ICAO Focal Point Finnish Transport and Jani LUIRO Communications Agency Traficom SDM Focal Point Fintraffic Air Navigation Pekka VIRTANEN Services Ltd Focal Point for SUR Fintraffic Air Navigation Tero Alastalo Services Ltd
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 61 Released Issue B. National stakeholders organisation charts
Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 62 Released Issue Finavia Corporation
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 63 Released Issue
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 64 Released Issue Fintraffic Air Navigation Services Ltd
Annual meeting of shareholders
Board
CEO
Safety and Compliance
Operational Supporting planning and Technical planning functions operative ATC-units and operations
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 65 Released Issue Finnish Meteorological Institute
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 66 Released Issue C. Implementation Objectives’ links with other plans
The table below (extracted from the MPL3 Progress Plan 2020) shows for each implementation objective, the mapping of the L3 implementation Objectives to the corresponding SESAR Essential Operational Changes, the SESAR Solutions, the Deployment Program families, the ICAO ASBU, the EASA EPAS, the Network Strategy Plan, the Airspace Architecture Study Transition Plan (AAS TP) Milestones and the SESAR Key Features.
EOC Level 3 Implementation Objectives SESAR Sol. DP family ICAO ASBUs EPAS NSP AAS TP KF
ATC21-Composite surveillance ADS- ASUR-B0/1 RMT.0679 SO8/3 #114 - - EAI B/WAM ASUR-B0/2 RMT.0519 SO8/4 COM10 - Migration from AFTN to - - COMI B0/7 - - - EAI AMHS COM11.1 - Voice over Internet 3.1.4 - COMI B2/1 - SO8/4 AM-1.3 EAI Protocol (VoIP) in En-Route 3.2.1 COM11.2 - Voice over Internet - - COMI B2/1 - SO8/4 - EAI Protocol (VoIP) in Airport/Terminal
ITY-ACID - Aircraft identification - - - - SO8/2 - EAI 6.1.1 ITY-AGDL - Initial ATC air-ground data COMI B0/4 SO4/1 - 6.1.3 RMT.0524 AM-1.1 EAI link services COMI B1/2 SO8/3 6.1.4 ITY-AGVCS2 – 8.33 kHz Air-Ground - - - - SO8/1 - EAI Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 ITY-SPI - Surveillance performance ASUR B0/1 RMT.0679 SO8/3 - - - EAI and interoperability ASUR B0/3 RMT.0519 SO8/4 APTA B0/1 APTA NAV10 - RNP Approach Procedures 1.2.1 RMT.0639 #103 B1/1 SO6/5 - AATS to instrument RWY 1.2.2 RMT.0445 NAVS B0/2 NAV11 - Precision Approach using #55 - NAVS B1/1 - - - HPO GBAS CAT II/III based on GPS L1 AOM13.1 - Harmonise OAT and GAT - - - - SO6/2 - OANS handling AOP11 - Initial Airport Operations #21 2.1.4 NOPS B1/3 - SO6/2 - HPAO Plan
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 67 Released Issue AOP17 – Provision/integration of DPI #61 - NOPS B0/4 - - - HPAO to NMOC SO2/3 5.1.2 SO2/4 COM12 - NewPENS - COMI B1/1 - - EAI 5.2.1 SO8/3 SO8/4 SO4/2 FCM03 - Collaborative flight planning - 4.2.3 NOPS B0/2 - SO5/1 AM-1.14 OANS SO5/6 SO4/3 FCM04.2 - STAM phase 2 #17 4.1.2 NOPS B1/1 - AM-1.11 OANS SO5/4 SO2/1 4.2.2 SO2/2 FCM05 - Interactive rolling NOP #20, #21 NOPS B1/2 - AM-1.12 OANS 4.2.4 SO2/3 SO2/4 FCM06 - Traffic Complexity SO4/3 #19 4.4.2 NOPS B1/4 - AM-1.13 OANS Assessment SO5/4 FCM09 - Enhanced ATFM Slot #56 - NOPS B1/7 - SO6/1 - OANS swapping 5.1.3, 5.1.4, SO2/4 5.2.1, 5.2.2, AMET B2/4 INF08.1 - Information Exchanges SO2/5 #35, #46 5.2.3, 5.3.1, DAIM B2/1 - AM-1.5 EAI using the SWIM Yellow TI Profile SO5/2 5.4.1, 5.5.1, SWIM B3/1 SO5/5 5.6.1 5.1.3, 5.1.4, INF08.2 - Information Exchanges #28, SWIM B3/1, TBO SO5/2SO5 5.2.1, 5.2.2, - AM-9.1 EAI using the SWIM Blue TI Profile #46 B3/1 /5 5.2.3, 5.6.2 INF07 - Electronic Terrain and DAIM B1/4 RMT.0703 - 1.2.2 SO2/5 - EAI Obstacle Data (e-TOD) DAIM B1/4 RMT.0722 DAIM B1/7, AMET INF09 - Digital Integrated Briefing #34 - SO2/5 - EAI B1/4 ITY-ADQ - Ensure quality of RMT.0722 aeronautical data and aeronautical - 1.2.2 - SO2/5 - EAI RMT.0477 information
------
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 68 Released Issue #12, #71, AOP14 – Remote Tower Services - RATS B1/1 RMT.0624 - - HPAO #52, #13 AOP04.1 - A-SMGCS Surveillance #70 2.2.1 SURF B0/2 MST.029 SO6/6 - HPAO (former Level 1) AOP04.2 - A-SMGCS RMCA (former - 2.2.1 SURF B0/3 MST.029 SO6/6 - HPAO Level 2) ACDM B0/2 2.1.1 AOP05 - Airport CDM #106 NOPS B0/4 - SO6/4 - HPAO 2.1.3 RSEQ B0/2 AOP10 - Time Based Separation #64 2.3.1 WAKE B2/7 - SO6/5 - HPAO AOP12 - Improve RWY and Airfield 2.1.2 safety with CATC detection and #02 SURF B1/3 MST.029 SP6/6 - HPAO 2.5.1 CMAC AOP13 - Automated assistance to #22 Controller for Surface Movement 2.4.1 SURF B1/4 MST.029 SO6/6 - HPAO #53 planning and routing AOP15 - Safety Nets for vehicle #04 - SURF B2/2 MST.029 - - HPAO drivers AOP16 - Guidance assistance through #47 - SURF B1/1 MST.029 - - HPAO airfield lighting
AOP18 - Runway Status Lights #01 - SURF B2/2 MST.029 - - HPAO
ATC07.1 - Arrival management tools - 1.1.1 RSEQ B0/1 - SO4/1 - AATS
ATC19 - Enhanced AMAN-DMAN SO6/5 #54 - RSEQ B2/1 - - AATS integration SO4/1 ENV01 – Continuous Descent - - APTA B0/4 - SO6/5 - AATS Operations ENV02 – Airport Collaborative ------HPAO Environmental Management ENV03 – Continuous Climb - - APTA B0/5 - SO6/5 - AATS Operations RMT.0639 NAV03.1 – RNAV1 in TMA Operations #62 - APTA B0/2 SO6/5 - AATS RMT.0445
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 69 Released Issue 1.2.3 RMT.0639 NAV03.2 – RNP1 in TMA Operations #09, #51 APTA B1/2 SO6/5 - AATS 1.2.4 RMT.0445 MST.007 SAF11 - Improve runway safety by - - - RMT.0570 - - HPAO preventing runway excursions RMT.0703 AOM19.1 - ASM tools to support A- SO3/2 #31 3.1.1 FRTO B0/2 - AM-1.8 OANS FUA SO3/3 AOM19.2 - ASM management of real- FRTO B1/3 SO3/2 #31 3.1.2 - AM-1.8 OANS time airspace data NOPS B1/5 SO3/3 AOM19.3 - Full rolling ASM/ATFCM NOPS B1/5 SO3/2 #31 3.1.3 - AM-1.8 OANS process and ASM information sharing FRTO B1/3 SO3/3 AOM19.4 – Management of Pre- NOPS B1/6 SO3/2 #31 3.1.4 - - OANS defined Airspace Configurations FRTO B1/4 SO3/3 AM-1.6 3.2.1 SO3/1 AOM21.2 - Free Route Airspace #33, #66 FRTO B1/1 - AM-1.10 AATS 3.2.4 SO3/4 AM-5.1 SO3/1 AM-1.15 ATC12.1 - MONA, TCT and MTCD #27, #104 3.2.1 FRTO B1/5 - AATS SO4/1 AM-5.1 ATC15.1 - Initial extension of AMAN - 1.1.2 - - SO4/1 - AATS to En-route ATC15.2 - Extension of AMAN to En- RSEQ B1/1 #05 1.1.2 - SO4/1 AM-1.3 AATS route NOPS B1/8 ATC17 - Electronic Dialog supporting SO3/1 - 3.2.1 - - AM-1.3 AATS COTR SO4/1 ATC18 - Multi Sector Planning En- AM-4.3 #63 - FRTO B1/6 - SO4/1 AATS route – 1P2T AM-5.1 ITY-FMTP - Apply a common flight - - - - SO8/3 AM-1.3 EAI message transfer protocol (FMTP) SNET B0/1 SNET B0/2 ATC02.8 - Ground based safety nets - 3.2.1 - SO4/1 - AATS SNET B0/3 SNET B0/4 ATC02.9 - Enhanced STCA for TMAs #60 - SNET B1/2 MST.030 SO4/1 - AATS
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 70 Released Issue ATC20 – Enhanced STCA with DAP via #60 - SNET B1/1 - SO7/2 - AATS Mode S EHS NAV12 – ATS IFR Routes for #113 - APTA B0/6 MST.031 SO6/5 - AATS Rotorcraft Operations
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 71 Released Issue D. SESAR Solutions implemented in a voluntary way3
This Annex is not published in the LSSIP Level 1, but is available in the LSSIP Level 2, which can be made available upon request to Focal Point and/or Contact Person.
The implementation of SESAR Solutions is presently in hold due to limited resources available, caused by the COVID- 19 pandemic.
3 Referred as ‘Non-committed’ SESAR solutions in the MP L3 Report.
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 72 Released Issue E. Surveillance (SUR)
This Annex is not published in the LSSIP Level 1, but is available in the LSSIP Level 2, which can be made available upon request to Focal Point and/or Contact Person.
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 73 Released Issue F. Glossary of abbreviations
This Annex mainly shows the abbreviations that are specific to the LSSIP Document for Finland. Other general abbreviations are in the Acronyms and Abbreviations document in: https://www.eurocontrol.int/airial/
Term Description AF ATM Functionality FT Fast Track PCP Pilot Common Project PDP Preliminary Deployment Programme NEFAB North European Functional Airspace Block NEFRA North European Free Route Airspace NSA National Supervisory Authority S-AF Sub ATM Functionality SIA Safety Investigation Authority SNAB Strategic Nordic Military ATM Board
LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 74 Released Issue