FINLAND LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2020 1 - Implementation Overview
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
LSSIP 2020 - FINLAND LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2020 1 - Implementation Overview Document Title LSSIP Year 2020 for Finland Info Centre Reference 20/12/22/62 Date of Edition 31/03/2021 LSSIP Focal Point Jouko RANTA - [email protected] Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom LSSIP Contact Person Luca DELL’ORTO – [email protected] EUROCONTROL/NMD/INF/PAS LSSIP Support Team [email protected] Status Released Intended for EUROCONTROL Stakeholders Available in https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Reference Documents LSSIP Documents https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Master Plan Level 3 – Plan https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Edition 2020 implementation-plan-level-3 Master Plan Level 3 – Report https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Year 2020 implementation-report-level-3 European ATM Portal https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor National AIP https://www.ais.fi/en Performance Plan https://www.traficom.fi/en/transport/aviation/air-navigation-services-and- airspace LSSIP Year 2020 Finland Released Issue APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2020 document and the signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect the commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 (Implementation View) – Edition 2020. Stakeholder / Name Position Signature and date Organisation Finnish Transport and Deputy Director- Communications Jarkko SAARIMÄKI General Agency Traficom Fintraffic Air CEO of Fintraffic Air Navigation Services Raine LUOJUS Navigation Services Ltd Ltd Finnish Military Kim JUHALA Director of MAA Aviation Authority CEO of Finavia Finavia Corporation Kimmo MÄKI Corporation Finnish Director Meteorological Juhana HYRKKÄNEN Accountable Manager Institute LSSIP Year 2020 Finland Released Issue TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 12 1. National ATM Environment .......................................................... 13 Geographical Scope .............................................................................................. 13 National Stakeholders .......................................................................................... 15 2. Traffic and Capacity ...................................................................... 22 Evolution of traffic in Finland .............................................................................. 22 ACC Helsinki .......................................................................................................... 23 3. Implementation Projects .............................................................. 26 National projects .................................................................................................. 26 FAB projects .......................................................................................................... 26 Multinational projects .......................................................................................... 27 4. Cooperation activities ................................................................... 28 FAB Co-ordination ................................................................................................ 28 Multinational cooperation initiatives.................................................................. 28 5. Implementation Objectives Progress ............................................ 30 State View: Overall Objective Implementation Progress .................................. 30 Objective Progress per SESAR Essential Operational Changes.......................... 31 ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress ................................................................. 37 Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ................................................... 42 6. Annexes ........................................................................................ 61 A. Specialists involved in the ATM implementation reporting for Finland ........... 61 B. National stakeholders organisation charts ......................................................... 62 C. Implementation Objectives’ links with other plans ........................................... 67 D. SESAR Solutions implemented in a voluntary way............................................. 72 E. Surveillance (SUR)................................................................................................. 73 F. Glossary of abbreviations .................................................................................... 74 LSSIP Year 2020 Finland Released Issue Executive Summary National ATM Context Member State of: Main national stakeholders: - Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom – the civil aviation regulatory body and NSA ; - Fintraffic Air Navigation Services Ltd – the main ATS-provider in Finland; - Finavia Corporation – the main airport operator in Finland; - Finnish Meteorological Institute – designated MET provider; - City of Mikkeli – operator in Mikkeli airport (EFMI) and AFIS provider; - Seinäjoki Airport Ltd. – operator in Seinäjoki airport (EFSI) and AFIS provider; - Lappeenranta Airport Ltd. – operator in Lappeenranta airport (EFLP); - Military Aviation Authority (MAA) – the military regulatory body; - Air Force Command Finland; - Safety Investigation Authority (SIA). Main airport covered by LSSIP: Helsinki-Vantaa (EFHK) LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 1 Released Issue Traffic and Capacity -59% 2020 2020 Helsinki ACC 0.00 2019-2020 Finland is part of: The North European Functional Airspace Block Number of national projects: N/A (Projects mainly concentrated on ESSIP- and PCP Objectives) Number of FAB projects: 1 (FINEST) Number of multinational projects: 1 (Borealis Free Route Airspace, ) Summary of 2020 developments: Due to the decrease in staff availability caused by the Covid-19 actions and the response to traffic change, the projects could not be promoted as normal. Most of the ESSIP-objectives and PCP families are on time or completed. No major changes in organisational structures within national stakeholders during 2020. From the beginning of November, Finnish Meteorological Institute started sending weather messages also in digital IWXXM format, by using AMHS line. LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 2 Released Issue Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline (Pre-SESAR and SESAR1 non- PCP) and the PCP elements. It shows the average implementation progress for all objectives grouped by SESAR Phases, excluding those for which the State is outside the applicability area as defined on a yearly basis in the European ATM Master Plan (Level 3) 2020, i.e. disregarding the declared “NOT APPLICABLE” LSSIP progress status. The SESAR 1 (non-PCP) progress in the graphics below for this State is based on the following objectives: AOP 14, AOP15, AOP16, AOP18, ATC02.9, ATC18, ATC19, ATC20, NAV12 and COM11.2. Pre-SESAR Phase 2000 2030 88% SESAR 1 (PCP only) 2011 2025 42% SESAR 1 (non-PCP) 2013 2030 17% LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 3 Released Issue Progress per SESAR Essential Operational Changes and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Essential Operational Changes, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per EOC, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph. ATM 82 % Interconnected Network 32 % Airport and TMA 96 % performance 0 % 0 % CNS 82 % Infrastructure 40 % and Services 40 % Digital AIM and 28 % MET Services Fully Dynamic 100 % and Optimised 0 % Airspace 50 % Multimodal Mobility and 0 % integration of all Airspace Users Trajectory Based 100 % Operations 65 % Virtualisation of Service Provision 0 % 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Pre-SESAR Phase SESAR 1 (non-PCP) SESAR 1 (PCP only) LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 4 Released Issue ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Blocks. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter 5.3 – ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress. Block 0 2000 2030 89% Block 1 2009 2030 43% Block 2 2013 2030 10% Block 3 2018 2025 1% LSSIP Year 2020 Finland 5 Released Issue ATM Deployment Outlook State Objectives Deployed in 2019 - 2020 - Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) ITY-FMTP - 100 % progress By 2021 By 2022 By 2023 By 2024+ - Enhanced STCA with - Electronic Terrain and - Multi-Sector Planning - Information Exchanges down-linked parameters Obstacle Data (eTOD) En-route - 1P2T using the SWIM Yellow TI via Mode S EHS INF07 - 16 % progress ATC18 - 00 % progress Profile ATC20 - 30 % progress - Aircraft Identification INF08.1 - 01 % progress - Voice over Internet ITY-ACID - 75 % progress - 8,33 kHz Air-Ground Protocol (VoIP) in En- - Harmonise Operational Voice Channel Spacing Route Air Traffic (OAT) and below FL195 COM11.1 - 40 % progress General Air Traffic (GAT) ITY-AGVCS2 - 72 % - Short Term ATFCM Handling progress Measures (STAM) - Phase AOM13.1 - 65 % progress - ATS IFR