DOCSLIB.ORG

FORT NIOBRARA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE River Recreation Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FORT NIOBRARA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE River Recreation Management Plan U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Fort Niobrara National Wildlife Refuge HC 14, Box 67 Valentine, Nebraska 69201 FORT NIOBRARA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE River Recreation Management Plan January 2005 FORT NIOBRARA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE River Recreation Management Plan Approval U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 6 _______________________ ________________ r e b u H e c y o RDate Refuge Manager Fort Niobrara/Valentine/Seier NWR Complex ______________________________ ____________________ Dave Wiseman Date Refuge Supervisor ______________________________ ____________________ e p u h S n oR Date Regional Chief 2 Table of Contents SUMMARY...................................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 8 1.1. Purpose of Plan..............................................................................................................................................8 1.2. Need for Plan .................................................................................................................................................8 1.3. Legal and Policy Guidance ...........................................................................................................................9 National Wildlife Refuge System ...........................................................................................................................9 Fort Niobrara National Wildlife Refuge .............................................................................................................10 Relevant Policy......................................................................................................................................................12 1.4. Refuge Mission, Goals and Objectives.......................................................................................................12 CHAPTER 2. PLANNING PROCESS.......................................................................... 14 2.1. Description of Planning Process.................................................................................................................14 2.2. Comprehensive Conservation Plan............................................................................................................14 2.3. Research and Other Information...............................................................................................................14 Standards of Quality for River Use within the Fort Niobrara Wilderness Area ............................................15 Management Guidance to Address Unacceptable Recreation Impacts on the Niobrara National Scenic River within the Fort Niobrara Wilderness, Nebraska .....................................................................................15 Impacts of River Recreation on Birds at Fort Niobrara National Wildlife Refuge: 2000-2002.....................15 Visitor Use Trends on the Niobrara National Scenic River: 1993-2001...........................................................16 Mixing metaphors: a community based vision for the Niobrara National Scenic River ................................18 Other Information ................................................................................................................................................18 2.4. Public Involvement......................................................................................................................................19 2.5. Issues.............................................................................................................................................................20 Refuge Purposes / Responsibilities ......................................................................................................................20 Visitor Experience.................................................................................................................................................20 Commercial Outfitting .........................................................................................................................................20 User Fee .................................................................................................................................................................20 Facilities/Access.....................................................................................................................................................20 Regulations ............................................................................................................................................................21 Economic and Environmental Consequences.....................................................................................................21 Planning Process & Future Management ...........................................................................................................21 CHAPTER 3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ................................................................ 22 3.1 Geographic/Ecosystem Setting ...................................................................................................................22 3.2 Natural Resources .......................................................................................................................................22 Topography/Geology/Soils ...................................................................................................................................22 3 Water Resources ...................................................................................................................................................23 Plants......................................................................................................................................................................23 Wildlife...................................................................................................................................................................24 Threatened and Endangered Species ..................................................................................................................26 3.3. Special Designations ....................................................................................................................................26 Fort Niobrara Wilderness Area...........................................................................................................................26 Niobrara National Scenic River...........................................................................................................................27 3.4 Cultural and Paleontological Resources....................................................................................................27 3.5 Public Use.....................................................................................................................................................28 General...................................................................................................................................................................28 Wildlife-Dependent River Recreation.................................................................................................................28 3.6 Socio-Economics ..........................................................................................................................................33 CHAPTER 4. MANAGEMENT DIRECTION ................................................................. 35 4.1. Refuge Purposes / Responsibilities.............................................................................................................35 River Stretch Open to Recreational Use .............................................................................................................35 Annual and Daily River Recreational Use Levels ..............................................................................................35 Specified Times of Day for Wildlife and/or Recreation.....................................................................................36 Minimize Impact to Wildlife, Plants, and Habitats............................................................................................36 Monitoring and Research.....................................................................................................................................36 4.2 Visitor Experience ......................................................................................................................................36 Allocation of Annual Use between Private Floaters and Outfitters..................................................................36 Spectrum of Opportunities (Wilderness Solitude to Recreational) ..................................................................36 Vessel Type and Group Size.................................................................................................................................37 Interpretation and Environmental Education....................................................................................................37 4.3. Commercial Outfitting................................................................................................................................37 River Outfitting Opportunity, Requirements and Selection .............................................................................37 Special Use Permit ................................................................................................................................................38
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions
    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Through the Buffalo Grass: a Lakota Story Cycle Paul A
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Paul Johnsgard Collection Papers in the Biological Sciences 2008 Wind Through the Buffalo Grass: A Lakota Story Cycle Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/johnsgard Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, Other Languages, Societies, and Cultures Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "Wind Through the Buffalo Grass: A Lakota Story Cycle" (2008). Paul Johnsgard Collection. 51. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/johnsgard/51 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Paul Johnsgard Collection by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Fiction I Historical History I Native Ameri("an Wind Through the Buffalo Grass: A Lakota Story Cycle is a narrative history of the Pine Ridge Lakota tribe of South Dakota, following its history from 1850 to the present day through actual historical events and through the stories of four fictional Lakota children, each related by descent and separated from one another by two generations. The ecology of the Pine Ridge region, especially its mammalian and avian wildlife, is woven into the stories of the children. 111ustrated by the author, the book includes drawings of Pine Ridge wildlife, regional maps, and Native American pictorial art. Appendices include a listing of important Lakota words, and checklists of mammals and breeding birds of the region. Dr. Paul A. Johnsgard is foundation professor of biological sciences emeritus of the University of Nebraska-lincoln.
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Dakota, Nakota, Lakota Life (Worksheets)
    Dakota, Nakota, Lakota Life South Dakota State Historical Society Education Kit Dakota, Nakota, Lakota Life (Worksheets) Background Information: About 8.3% of South Dakotans hold dual citizenship. Most of the 64,000 American Indians living in South Dakota are members of the Lakota, Nakota and Dakota Nation (also known as the 1 Great Sioux Nation) as well as Americans. Lakota histories are passed from generation to generation through storytelling. One story tells about the Lakota coming to the plains to live and becoming Oceti Sakowin, the Seven Council Fires. The story begins when the Lakota lived in a land by a large lake where they ate fish and were warm and happy. A man appeared, and told them to travel northward. The Lakota obeyed, and began the journey north. On their way they got cold, and the sun was too weak to cook their food. Two young men had a vision, and following its instructions, they gathered dry grasses and struck two flint stones together, creating a spark and making fire. There were seven groups of relatives traveling together. Each group took some of the fire, and used it to build their own fire, around which they would gather. 2 As a result, they became known as the Seven Council Fires, or Oceti Sakowin. During the mid-17th century, nearly all the Sioux people lived near Mille Lacs, Minnesota.3 Pressured by the Chippewas, they moved west out of northern Minnesota in clan groups by the early 18th century.4 The three tribes spoke the same general language, but each developed dialects or variations, which also became their known name.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri River Valley in North Eastern Nebraska
    Water-Supply Paper No. 2 15 f A, Economic Geology, 96 n I B, Descriptive Geology, 118 owm] M, General Hydrographic Investigations, 25 [ 0, Underground Waters, 71 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR GEOLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES OF A PORTION OF THE MISSOURI RIVER VALLEY IN NORTH EASTERN NEBRASKA BY GK E. WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1908 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction___________________ Topography ___________________ Descriptive geology _____ Stratigraphy ____________ Structure__________________ Description of the rocks____ Cretaceous system ___ Dakota sandstone __ Benton group______ 10 Graueros shale_ 11 Greenhorn limestone 11 Carlile shale_ 12 Niobrara formation 13 Pierre shale_______ 15 Tertiary system________ 18 Arikaree formation- 18 Pliocene deposits_ 19 Quaternary system_____ 20 Glacial drift_______ 20 Loess ________. 20 Alluvium______. 21 Dune sand_________ 22 Economic geology______________ 22 Mineral resources__________ 22 Brick clay ____________ 22 Sand and gravel_______ 22 Building stone_________ 22 Cement rock________ 23 Coal ____________. 2-i Peat __________________ 2-1 Volcanic ash___________ 24 Water resources- __________ 25 General statement _____ 25 Surface waters ________ 25 Streams___________ 25 Springs _______. 20 Underground waters _ 27 Shallow wells _____ 27 Artesian wells_____ 28 Artesian conditions ___________________ 28. Chemical composition of artesian water- 28 Pressure _______________ _ 29 Temperature of artesian water________ 30 Construction and care of
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Dakota, Nakota, Lakota Life South Dakota State Historical Society Education Kit Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Goals and Materials 2 Photograph List 3-4 Books and CDs in the Kit 5 Music CDs and DVD in the Kit 6 Erasing Native American Stereotypes 7-8 Teacher Resource 9-18 Bibliography 19-20 Worksheets Word Find 21 Word Find Key 22 Crossword Puzzle 23 Crossword Puzzle Key 24 Word Scramble 25 Word Scramble Key 26 Activities Reading an Object 27-28 Object Identification Sheet 29-35 Trek to Wind Cave 36-37 South Dakota Coordinates Worksheet 38 Comparing Families 39-40 Comparing Families Worksheet 41 What Does the Photo Show? 42-43 Beadwork Designs 44-45 Beadwork Designs Worksheet 46 Beadwork Designs Key 47 Lazy Stitch Beading 48-49 Lazy Stitch Beading Instructions / Pattern 50-51 What Do You Get From a Buffalo? 52-53 Buffalo Uses Worksheet 54 Pin the Parts on the Buffalo 55-56 Pin the Parts on the Buffalo Worksheet 57 Pin the Parts on the Buffalo Worksheet Key 58 Pin the Parts on the Buffalo Outline & Key 59-60 Create a Ledger Drawing 61-62 Examples of Ledger Drawings 63-66 Traditional & Contemporary: Comparing Drum 67-68 Groups Come Dance With Us: Identifying Powwow Dance 69-72 Styles 1 Dakota, Nakota, Lakota Life South Dakota State Historical Society Education Kit Goals and Materials Goals Kit users will: explore the history and culture of the Dakota, Nakota and Lakota people understand the changes brought about by the shift from buffalo hunting to reservation life appreciate that the Dakota, Nakota and Lakota culture is not something
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Small Vessel General Permit
    ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PUBLIC NOTICE The United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois has requested a determination from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources if their Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) are consistent with the enforceable policies of the Illinois Coastal Management Program (ICMP). VGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non-recreational vessels greater than or equal to 79 ft. in length. sVGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non- recreational vessels less than 79 ft. in length. VGP and sVGP can be viewed in their entirety at the ICMP web site http://www.dnr.illinois.gov/cmp/Pages/CMPFederalConsistencyRegister.aspx Inquiries concerning this request may be directed to Jim Casey of the Department’s Chicago Office at (312) 793-5947 or [email protected]. You are invited to send written comments regarding this consistency request to the Michael A. Bilandic Building, 160 N. LaSalle Street, Suite S-703, Chicago, Illinois 60601. All comments claiming the proposed actions would not meet federal consistency must cite the state law or laws and how they would be violated. All comments must be received by July 19, 2012. Proposed Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) SMALL VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS LESS THAN 79 FEET (sVGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended (33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic & Social Values of Recreational Floating on The
    Economic & Social Values of Recreational Floating on the Niobrara National Scenic River Final Report July 2009 Prepared by: Steven Shultz, PhD University of Nebraska at Omaha ([email protected]) Niobrara National Scenic River Floaters (Photos by S. Schneider, NPS; L. Hutchinson, NGPC; and S. Shultz, UNO) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this Research Provided by The Nebraska Game and Parks Commission and the Nebraska Environmental Trust University of Nebraska Research Assistants and Editorial Support Drew Kessler and Magally Martinez, University of Nebraska‐Lincoln Andrew Bauer and Jackie Lynch, University of Nebraska at Omaha Institutions/Agencies that Provided Invaluable Advice and/or Assistance Cherry County UNL‐Extension Service The Niobrara Council The National Park Service Smith Falls State Park and Valentine State Fish Hatchery The Nebraska University Water Center The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Fort Niobrara National Wildlife Refuge) Niobrara National Scenic River Outfitters Who Permitted Access to Their Parking Areas and/or Campgrounds (for Visitor Surveys) Graham Canoe Outfitters; Rocky Ford Outfitters; Dryland Aquatics; Brewers Canoers and Tubes; Sunnybrook Camp, Sharps Outfitters; Rock Barn Outfitters; Stan’s Landing Disclaimer Much appreciation is extended to the above funding agencies, research assistants, and collaborators. However, all statements and/or any potential errors and omissions are the sole responsibility of the author. Author Contact Information Steven Shultz, PhD Economics Department, College of Business Administration, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, 68132 Phone: 402‐554‐2810 Email: [email protected] i TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary iii List of Figures iv List of Tables v 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Purpose and Objectives 3 1.3 Prior Studies 3 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Cherry County, Nebraskaâ•Žs Cattle
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research, History, Department of Department of History 11-1998 Cattle, Environment, and Economic Change: A History of Cherry County, Nebraska’s Cattle Industry, from Earliest Times to 1940 Gail Lorna DiDonato University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/historydiss Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Meat Science Commons, and the United States History Commons DiDonato, Gail Lorna, "Cattle, Environment, and Economic Change: A History of Cherry County, Nebraska’s Cattle ndusI try, from Earliest Times to 1940" (1998). Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research, Department of History. 78. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/historydiss/78 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research, Department of History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. CATTLE, ENVIRONMENT, AND ECONOMIC CHANGE: A HISTORY OF CHERRY COUNTY, NEBRASKA’S CATTLE INDUSTRY, FROM EARLIEST TIMES TO 1940 by Gail Loma DiDonato A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Major: History Under the Supervision of Professor John Wunder and Professor Benjamin Rader Lincoln, Nebraska November, 1998 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. DM! Number: 9917827 Copyright 1999 by DiDonato, Gail Loraa All rights reserved. UMI Microform 9917827 Copyright 1999, by UMI Company. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • UTO Grants to SD 1928 to 2016
    UTO GRANTS TO Diocese of South Dakota 1928 - 2016 Year Amount Diocese Companion Diocese Cause 1928 $1,500.00 South Dakota Little Eagle: To build a chapel. 1931 $1,500.00 South Dakota Little Eagle: To build a chapel. Springfield: To provide funds for a school building, dining room, kitchen, 1958 $100,000.00 South Dakota utility and social areas, and a heating plant for St. Mary's School. Indian Field: To repair and renovate parish halls, rectories. and staff 1964 $76,000.00 South Dakota residences (21 structures). Advance Planning Project: To support two years of intensive planning for new styles, structure, and programs for the Missionary District of South 1969 $50,000.00 South Dakota Dakota. Niobara Advance Planning: To help create an overall strategy for the Indian ministries in the diocese including clergy placement, 1971 $45,000.00 South Dakota programming, and defining of objectives. Soldier Creek: Grace Church - To contribute toward the cost of building a new church with a child care center, Headstart program, and community 1973 $8,000.00 South Dakota hall. Browns Valley Guild Hall: To provide funds toward a meeting 1974 $5,000.00 South Dakota space/building for the community. Guild Hall Ideal: To provide funds for a new building for church and 1974 $6,800.00 South Dakota community use. 1974 $5,000.00 South Dakota Little Eagle: To fund foundation repairs for a church. 1975 $8,000.00 South Dakota Little Oak Creek: To build a new church for Good Shepherd Church. 1975 $13,000.00 South Dakota Batesland: To build St.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Niobrara National Wildlife Refuge Valentine, Nebraska
    Fort Niobrara National Wildlife Refuge Valentine, Nebraska Annual Narrative Report Calendar Year 2001 Fort Niobrara-Valentine NWR Complex Valentine, Nebraska Annual Narrative Report Calendar Year 2001 Refuge Manager Date Refuge Supervisor Review Date Regional Office Approval Date 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS B. Climatic Conditions ........................................................................... 8 D. Planning .............................................................................................. 8 D.2. Management Plan ......................................................................................................... 8 2.a. Wilderness Stewardship Plan .................................................................................. 8 D.S. Research and Investigations ........................................................................................ 8 D.5.a. Recreational Impacts on Avian Assemblages in the Niobrara River Corridor, Fort Niobrara NWR ..•.......................................................................................................... 9 D.5.b. Bison Chemical Immobilization Study: Effects of Varying Antagonist Regimens on Recovery from Carfentanil-Xylazine Anesthesia ......................................................... 10 D.5.c. Comparison of Bison Weights for Department of Interior Herds . .................... 10 D.5.d. Genetic Parameters of the Bison Herd on Fort Niobrara NationaJ Wildlife Refuge .....•....••...........•.....................................................................•.....
    [Show full text]
  • The President Oe the United States Transmitting
    93d Congress, 2d Session ........... House Document No. 93-403 PROPOSED ADDITIONS TO THE NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM COMMUNICATION FROM THE PRESIDENT OE THE UNITED STATES TRANSMITTING PROPOSALS FOR THIRTY-SEVEN ADDITIONS TO THE NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM AND DEFERRAL OF ACTION ON FIVE AREAS SUITABLE FOR INCLUSION IN THE SYSTEM, AND RECOMMENDATIONS AGAINST THE INCLUSION OF FOUR OTHER AREAS STUDIED, PURSUANT TO SECTION 3 OF THE WILDER- NESS ACT OF 1964 [16 USC 1132] PART 24 FORT NOIBRARA WILDERNESS NEBRASKA DECEMBER 4, 1974.— Referred to the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs and ordered to be printed with illustrations. U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1974 42 797 O THE WHITE HOUSE WAS HIN GTO N December 4, 1974 Dear Mr. Speaker: Pursuant to the Wilderness Act of September 3, 1964, I am pleased to transmit herewith proposals for thirty-seven additions to the National Wilderness Preservation System. As described in the Wilderness Message that I am con- currently sending to the Congress today, the proposed new wilderness areas cover a total of over nine million primeval acres. In addition, the Secretary of the Interior has recommended that Congressional action on five other areas which include surface lands suitable for wilderness be deferred for the reasons set forth below: A. Three areas which are open to mining might be needed in the future to provide vital minerals for the Nation, but these areas have not been adequately surveyed for mineral deposits. The areas are the Kofa Game Range, Arizona; Charles Sheldon Antelope Range, Nevada and Oregon; and, Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Range, Montana.
    [Show full text]