Sea Ice Extent May Have Forced Emperor Penguins Into Refugia During the Last Glacial Maximum

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sea Ice Extent May Have Forced Emperor Penguins Into Refugia During the Last Glacial Maximum Global Change Biology (2015), doi: 10.1111/gcb.12882 Too much of a good thing: sea ice extent may have forced emperor penguins into refugia during the last glacial maximum JANE L. YOUNGER1,2*, GEMMA V. CLUCAS3,4*, GERALD KOOYMAN5 , † BARBARA WIENECKE6 , ALEX D. ROGERS4 ,PHILIPN.TRATHAN7 ,TOMHART4 and † KAREN J. MILLER8,9 1Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart 7001 Tas., Australia, 2Australian School of Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University, 2 Technology Place, Sydney 2109 NSW, Australia, 3Ocean and Earth Sciences, University of Southampton Waterfront Campus, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK, 4Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK, 5Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, San Diego CA, USA, 6Australian Antarctic Division, 203 Channel Highway, Kingston 7050 Tas., Australia, 7British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK, 8Australian Institute of Marine Science, The UWA Oceans Institute, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia, 9School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 5, Hobart 7001 Tas., Australia Abstract The relationship between population structure and demographic history is critical to understanding microevolution and for predicting the resilience of species to environmental change. Using mitochondrial DNA from extant colonies and radiocarbon-dated subfossils, we present the first microevolutionary analysis of emperor penguins (Aptenodytes forsteri) and show their population trends throughout the last glacial maximum (LGM, 19.5–16 kya) and during the subsequent period of warming and sea ice retreat. We found evidence for three mitochondrial clades within emperor penguins, suggesting that they were isolated within three glacial refugia during the LGM. One of these clades has remained largely isolated within the Ross Sea, while the two other clades have intermixed around the coast of Antarc- tica from Adelie Land to the Weddell Sea. The differentiation of the Ross Sea population has been preserved despite rapid population growth and opportunities for migration. Low effective population sizes during the LGM, followed by a rapid expansion around the beginning of the Holocene, suggest that an optimum set of sea ice conditions exist for emperor penguins, corresponding to available foraging area. Keywords: Antarctica, Aptenodytes forsteri, climate change ecology, molecular ecology, paleoecology, phylogeography, polynya, Ross Sea Received 24 July 2014; revised version received 13 November 2014 and accepted 30 December 2014 shifts, fluctuations in abundance, species extinctions, Introduction and also in the formation of genetically distinct popula- Genetic data from both modern and subfossil samples, tions (Hewitt, 1996). As climate change and habitat deg- paleoecological niche modeling, and fossil evidence radation potentially take us into the 6th mass extinction have become vital tools for reconstructing demographic (Barnosky et al., 2011), it is critical that we understand histories (e.g., woolly mammoths (Mammuthus primige- how species have coped with change in the past to be nius) (Nogues-Bravo et al., 2008) and lions (Panthera leo) able to assess their likely responses and resilience to (Barnett et al., 2014)). Indeed, such studies have shown future climate change (Hoelzel, 2010). that species’ patterns of genetic diversity and distribu- Emperor penguins (Aptenodytes forsteri) are an iconic tion have varied dramatically under different climatic Antarctic species whose population genetic structure regimes (Carstens & Richards, 2007). Climatic shifts has not been studied to date. We know little about dis- have been one of the major drivers of species’ range persal among colonies or how historical climate change may have affected their range and abundance. Thus, Correspondence: Jane Younger, tel. +61 439 869 364, we have limited capacity to predict how these birds e-mail: [email protected]; Gemma Clucas, tel. +44 1865 may fare in the future. Projections for continent-wide 281991, e-mail: [email protected] declines of emperor penguins have been made based *These authors have contributed equally to the manuscript and are on the demographic responses of the Pointe Geologie joint first and corresponding authors. † These authors have contributed equally to the manuscript and are colony to changes in sea ice conditions (Barbraud & joint last authors. Weimerskirch, 2001; Jenouvrier et al., 2009, 2012, 2014; © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 1 2 J. L. YOUNGER et al. Ainley et al., 2010). However, decadal monitoring data emperor penguins may also have to contend with are only available for this single site out of 46 known altered prey availability and face new threats from pre- emperor penguin colonies; as such, the climate change dators as changing conditions differentially affect spe- responses of emperor penguins across their entire dis- cies at other trophic levels (Trathan et al., 2011). tribution and over millennial timescales are currently During the last glacial maximum (LGM, 19.5–16 kya), unknown (Ainley et al., 2010). the winter sea ice extent was approximately double the Emperor penguins are highly reliant on sea ice present-day values, and seasonal variation in sea ice throughout most of their breeding cycle, and mating and extent is thought to have been greater (Gersonde et al., incubation takes place on land-fast sea ice in most of the 2005). It is unclear how this would have affected known colonies (Fretwell et al., 2012, 2014). During the emperor penguins. Thatje et al. (2008) suggested that breeding season, emperor penguins feed on prey that is they may have migrated with the sea ice to lower lati- also sea ice dependent (Gales et al., 1990). Significant tudes, staying within energetic migration thresholds of areas of open water exist year-round within the Antarc- the ice edge, and could have maintained breeding pop- tic sea ice zone in the form of leads and polynyas (Zwal- ulations around Antarctica by foraging in the marginal ly et al., 1985 and references therein). These areas are ice zone at the sea ice edge. Alternatively, they could often important in providing emperor penguins access have remained associated with polynyas. Sediment to their underwater foraging habitat when the fast ice cores suggest the existence of LGM polynyas in several extends far from their colonies (Dewasmes et al., 1980). locations, including the northwestern Ross Sea, the Polynya formation is driven by either upwelling of cir- southeastern Weddell Sea off Dronning Maud Land, cumpolar deep water or by the outflow of katabatic and the northwestern Weddell Sea (Mackensen et al., winds that push sea ice away from the coastline (Martin, 1994; Brambati et al., 2002; Thatje et al., 2008; Smith 2001). Polynyas are associated with enhanced primary et al., 2010). In either case, reductions in overall primary production, as the reduction in sea ice volume facilitates productivity within what is today’s seasonal sea ice an earlier spring melting of sea ice and a coincident ear- zone (Domack et al., 1998; Kohfeld et al., 2005) would lier start in photosynthetic primary productivity (Martin, likely have been detrimental to emperor penguin popu- 2001). Some polynyas are permanent features of the sea lations (Ainley et al., 2010). ice zone and create areas of hyperproductivity, such as Little is known about the level of natal philopatry or the Ross Sea polynya (Smith & Gordon, 1997), while migration among emperor penguin colonies. Under- most are smaller and ephemeral features depending on standing philopatry is particularly important in light of wind stresses and currents. population models that suggest that emperor penguins Changes in the extent and duration of sea ice around may be declining as a result of local climatic shifts (Je- Antarctica show highly regionalized trends with some nouvrier et al., 2009, 2014). High emigration rates are areas increasing or remaining stable while others are conceivable among emperor penguin colonies; satellite decreasing (Zwally et al., 2002; Vaughan et al., 2013); tracking has shown that they travel thousands of kilo- this has an effect on the population dynamics of meters on their juvenile journeys, often passing other emperor penguins as both positive and negative sea ice colonies (e.g., Kooyman et al., 1996; Wienecke et al., anomalies can result in negative population growth 2010; Thiebot et al., 2013). Generally, philopatry is high rates at the local scale (Massom et al., 2009; Ainley et al., among penguins (Saraux et al., 2011; Dehnhard et al., 2010; Barbraud et al., 2011; Jenouvrier et al., 2014). 2014), but population structure is absent in many spe- Despite uncertainties over the rate and extent of ice loss cies (e.g., Chinstrap penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica) that will occur around Antarctica, all climate models (Clucas et al., 2014)) as even low levels of migration can project a reduction in the extent and duration of Ant- be sufficient to homogenize populations (Hartl & Clark, arctic sea ice by the end of the century (Collins et al., 1997). 2013). As sea ice declines, we might expect emperor We analysed the population structure among eight penguins to be disadvantaged by a lack of breeding extant emperor penguin colonies (Fig. 1) using mito- habitat (Jenouvrier et al., 2014), unless they have the chondrial DNA sequences and inferred population tra- capacity to alter their preferred choice of breeding site
Recommended publications
  • Amanda Bay, Ingrid Christensen Coast, Princess Elizabeth Land, East Antarctica
    MEASURE 3 - ANNEX Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 169 AMANDA BAY, INGRID CHRISTENSEN COAST, PRINCESS ELIZABETH LAND, EAST ANTARCTICA Introduction Amanda Bay is located on the Ingrid Christensen Coast of Princess Elizabeth Land, East Antarctica at 69°15' S, 76°49’59.9" E. (Map A). The Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA) is designated to protect the breeding colony of several thousand pairs of emperor penguins annually resident in the south-west corner of Amanda Bay, while providing for continued collection of valuable long- term research and monitoring data and comparative studies with colonies elsewhere in East Antarctica. Only two other emperor penguin colonies along the extensive East Antarctic coastline are protected within ASPAs (ASPA 120, Point Géologie Archipelago and ASPA 167 Haswell Island). Amanda Bay is more easily accessed, from vessels or by vehicle from research stations in the Larsemann Hills and Vestfold Hills, than many other emperor penguin colonies in East Antarctica. This accessibility is advantageous for research purposes, but also creates the potential for human disturbance of the birds. The Antarctic coastline in the vicinity of Amanda Bay was first sighted and named the Ingrid Christensen Coast by Captain Mikkelsen in command of the Norwegian ship Thorshavn on 20 February 1935. Oblique aerial photographs of the coastline were taken by the Lars Christensen expedition in 1937 and by the US Operation Highjump in 1947 for reconnaissance purposes. In the 1954/55 summer, the Australian National Antarctic Research Expedition (ANARE) on the Kista Dan explored the waters of Prydz Bay, and the first recorded landing in the area was made by a sledging party led by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Status Assessment Emperor Penguin (Aptenodytes Fosteri)
    SPECIES STATUS ASSESSMENT EMPEROR PENGUIN (APTENODYTES FOSTERI) Emperor penguin chicks being socialized by male parents at Auster Rookery, 2008. Photo Credit: Gary Miller, Australian Antarctic Program. Version 1.0 December 2020 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services Program Branch of Delisting and Foreign Species Falls Church, Virginia Acknowledgements: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Penguins are flightless birds that are highly adapted for the marine environment. The emperor penguin (Aptenodytes forsteri) is the tallest and heaviest of all living penguin species. Emperors are near the top of the Southern Ocean’s food chain and primarily consume Antarctic silverfish, Antarctic krill, and squid. They are excellent swimmers and can dive to great depths. The average life span of emperor penguin in the wild is 15 to 20 years. Emperor penguins currently breed at 61 colonies located around Antarctica, with the largest colonies in the Ross Sea and Weddell Sea. The total population size is estimated at approximately 270,000–280,000 breeding pairs or 625,000–650,000 total birds. Emperor penguin depends upon stable fast ice throughout their 8–9 month breeding season to complete the rearing of its single chick. They are the only warm-blooded Antarctic species that breeds during the austral winter and therefore uniquely adapted to its environment. Breeding colonies mainly occur on fast ice, close to the coast or closely offshore, and amongst closely packed grounded icebergs that prevent ice breaking out during the breeding season and provide shelter from the wind. Sea ice extent in the Southern Ocean has undergone considerable inter-annual variability over the last 40 years, although with much greater inter-annual variability in the five sectors than for the Southern Ocean as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 78/Tuesday, April 23, 2019/Rules
    Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations 16791 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require Agricultural commodities, Pesticides SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The any special considerations under and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, as Executive Order 12898, entitled requirements. amended (‘‘ACA’’) (16 U.S.C. 2401, et ‘‘Federal Actions to Address Dated: April 12, 2019. seq.) implements the Protocol on Environmental Justice in Minority Environmental Protection to the Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., Populations and Low-Income Antarctic Treaty (‘‘the Protocol’’). Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. Annex V contains provisions for the 1994). Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is protection of specially designated areas Since tolerances and exemptions that amended as follows: specially managed areas and historic are established on the basis of a petition sites and monuments. Section 2405 of under FFDCA section 408(d), such as PART 180—[AMENDED] title 16 of the ACA directs the Director the tolerance exemption in this action, of the National Science Foundation to ■ do not require the issuance of a 1. The authority citation for part 180 issue such regulations as are necessary proposed rule, the requirements of the continues to read as follows: and appropriate to implement Annex V Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. to the Protocol. et seq.) do not apply. ■ 2. Add § 180.1365 to subpart D to read The Antarctic Treaty Parties, which This action directly regulates growers, as follows: includes the United States, periodically food processors, food handlers, and food adopt measures to establish, consolidate retailers, not States or tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Seabird Colonies As Relevant Sources of Pollutants in Antarctic Ecosystems: Part 1 - Trace Elements C.V.Z
    Seabird colonies as relevant sources of pollutants in Antarctic ecosystems: Part 1 - Trace elements C.V.Z. Cipro, P. Bustamante, M.V. Petry, R.C. Montone To cite this version: C.V.Z. Cipro, P. Bustamante, M.V. Petry, R.C. Montone. Seabird colonies as relevant sources of pollutants in Antarctic ecosystems: Part 1 - Trace elements. Chemosphere, Elsevier, 2018, 204, pp.535-547. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.048. hal-02014986 HAL Id: hal-02014986 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02014986 Submitted on 4 Mar 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Seabird colonies as relevant sources of pollutants in Antarctic ecosystems: Part 1 - Trace elements Cipro, C.V.Z. 1,2*, Bustamante, P.2, Petry, M.V.3 and Montone, R.C.1 1 Laboratório de Química Orgânica Marinha, Instituto Oceanográfico (LabQOM), Universidade de São Paulo, Praça do Oceanográfico n° 191, 05508-120 São Paulo, SP, Brazil 2 Littoral Environnement et Sociétés (LIENSs), UMR 7266, CNRS-Université de La Rochelle, 2 rue Olympe de Gouges 17042 La Rochelle Cedex 01, France 3 Laboratório de Ornitologia e Animais Marinhos, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, Av.
    [Show full text]
  • National Science Foundation § 670.29
    National Science Foundation § 670.29 the unique natural ecological system ASPA 115 Lagotellerie Island, Mar- in that area; and guerite Bay, Graham Land (c) Where a management plan exists, ASPA 116 New College Valley, information demonstrating the consist- Caughley Beach, Cape Bird, Ross Is- ency of the proposed actions with the land management plan. ASPA 117 Avian Island, Marguerite Bay, Antarctic Peninsula § 670.29 Designation of Antarctic Spe- ASPA 118 Summit of Mount Mel- cially Protected Areas, Specially bourne, Victoria Land Managed Areas and Historic Sites ASPA 119 Davis Valley and Forlidas and Monuments. Pond, Dufek Massif, Pensacola Moun- (a) The following areas have been tains designated by the Antarctic Treaty ASPA 120 Pointe-Geologie Parties for special protection and are Archipelego, Terre Adelie hereby designated as Antarctic Spe- ASPA 121 Cape Royds, Ross Island cially Protected Areas (ASPA). The ASPA 122 Arrival Heights, Hut Point Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, as Peninsula, Ross Island amended, prohibits, unless authorized ASPA 123 Barwick and Balham Val- by a permit, any person from entering leys, Southern Victoria Land or engaging in activities within an ASPA 124 Cape Crozier, Ross Island ASPA. Detailed maps and descriptions ASPA 125 Fildes Peninsula, King of the sites and complete management George Island (25 de Mayo) plans can be obtained from the Na- ASPA 126 Byers Peninsula, Living- tional Science Foundation, Office of ston Island, South Shetland Islands Polar Programs, National Science ASPA 127 Haswell Island Foundation, Room 755, 4201 Wilson ASPA 128 Western shore of Admiralty Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230. Bay, King George Island, South Shet- ASPA 101 Taylor Rookery, Mac.
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT – AUSTRALIAN ANTARCTIC PROGRAM AVIATION OPERATIONS 2020-2025 Draft Released for Public Comment
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT – AUSTRALIAN ANTARCTIC PROGRAM AVIATION OPERATIONS 2020-2025 draft released for public comment This document should be cited as: Commonwealth of Australia (2020). Environmental Impact Assessment – Australian Antarctic Program Aviation Operations 2020-2025 – draft released for public comment. Australian Antarctic Division, Kingston. © Commonwealth of Australia 2020 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to. Disclaimer The contents of this document have been compiled using a range of source materials and were valid as at the time of its preparation. The Australian Government is not liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of the document. Cover photos from L to R: groomed runway surface, Globemaster C17 at Wilkins Aerodrome, fuel drum stockpile at Davis, Airbus landing at Wilkins Aerodrome Prepared by: Dr Sandra Potter on behalf of: Mr Robb Clifton Operations Manager Australian Antarctic Division Kingston 7050 Australia 2 Contents Overview 7 1. Background 9 1.1 Australian Antarctic Program aviation 9 1.2 Previous assessments of aviation activities 10 1.3 Scope of this environmental impact assessment 11 1.4 Consultation and decision outcomes 12 2. Details of the proposed activity and its need 13 2.1 Introduction 13 2.2 Inter-continental flights 13 2.3 Air-drop operations 14 2.4 Air-to-air refuelling operations 14 2.5 Operation of Wilkins Aerodrome 15 2.6 Intra-continental fixed-wing operations 17 2.7 Operation of ski landing areas 18 2.8 Helicopter operations 18 2.9 Fuel storage and use 19 2.10 Aviation activities at other sites 20 2.11 Unmanned aerial systems 20 2.12 Facility decommissioning 21 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Dispersal Processes on the Global Dynamics of Emperor
    Appendices: Influence of dispersal processes on the global dynamics of Emperor penguin, a species threatened by climate change. Contents A Information about the known colonies of the emperor penguin in Antarctica. 2 B Description of the metapopulation model 5 B.1 Construction of the reproduction matrix F .......................5 B.2 The dispersal model . .9 C Global sensitivity analysis 13 D Baby models 15 D.1 Case 1 and 2: dispersion to the good patch is not always optimal . 15 D.1.1 Description of local and global dynamics . 15 D.1.2 Close to the equilibrium: analytical results. 16 D.1.3 Far away from the equilibrium: numerical results. 18 D.2 Case 3: Random dispersion between poor quality habitats . 20 D.3 Implications of theoretical results for the emperor penguin . 21 E Local and regional population dynamics 23 E.1 Population size of each colony . 23 E.2 Regional population size . 26 F Isolating the colonies on the Ross Sea 31 G Random departure and random search dispersal 34 1 A Information about the known colonies of the emperor penguin in Antarctica. Table 1: Information about the known colonies of the emperor penguin in Antarctica, modified from Fretwell et al. (2012) { see the figure A.1 for a spatial repartition of the known colonies in Antarctica. # is the index of the colony used in our figures; BE is the best estimate of the observed number of breeding pairs in 2009 used in our model simulations. # name longitude latitude BE 2009 1 Snowhill -57.44 -64.52 2164 2 Dolleman -60.43 -70.61 1620 3 Smith -60.83 -74.37 4018 4 Gould -47.68
    [Show full text]
  • The Emperor Penguin - Vulnerable to Projected Rates of Warming and Sea Ice Loss ⁎ Philip N
    Biological Conservation xxx (xxxx) xxxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Review The emperor penguin - Vulnerable to projected rates of warming and sea ice loss ⁎ Philip N. Trathana, , Barbara Wieneckeb, Christophe Barbraudc, Stéphanie Jenouvrierc,d, Gerald Kooymane, Céline Le Bohecf,g, David G. Ainleyh, André Anceli,j, Daniel P. Zitterbartk,l, Steven L. Chownm, Michelle LaRuen, Robin Cristofario, Jane Youngerp, Gemma Clucasq, Charles-André Bostc, Jennifer A. Brownr, Harriet J. Gilletta, Peter T. Fretwella a British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB30ET, UK b Australian Antarctic Division, 203 Channel Highway, Tasmania 7050, Australia c Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR 7372, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 79360 Villiers en Bois, France d Biology Department, MS-50, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA e Scholander Hall, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, 9500 Gilman Drive 0204, La Jolla, CA 92093-0204, USA f Département d'Écologie, Physiologie, et Éthologie, Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien (IPHC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unite Mixte de Recherche 7178, 23 rue Becquerel, 67087 Strasbourg Cedex 02, France g Scientific Centre of Monaco, Polar Biology Department, 8 Quai Antoine 1er, 98000, Monaco h H.T. Harvey and Associates Ecological Consultants, Los Gatos, California, CA 95032, USA i Université de Strasbourg, IPHC, 23 rue Becquerel, 67087 Strasbourg, France j CNRS, UMR7178, 67087 Strasbourg, France k Applied Ocean Physics and Engineering, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA l Department of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Henkestrasse 91, 91052 Erlangen, Germany m School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia n University of Minnesota, Minneapolis and St.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport of Nutrients and Contaminants from Ocean to Island by Emperor Penguins from Amanda Bay, East Antarctic
    Science of the Total Environment 468–469 (2014) 578–583 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Science of the Total Environment journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scitotenv Transport of nutrients and contaminants from ocean to island by emperor penguins from Amanda Bay, East Antarctic Tao Huang, Liguang Sun ⁎, Yuhong Wang, Zhuding Chu, Xianyan Qin, Lianjiao Yang Institute of Polar Environment, School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China HIGHLIGHTS • Emperor penguins transfer nutrients and contaminants from ocean to island and lake or pond system. • Stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes in determining sources of organic matters in lake sediments • Differences in biotransfer efficiency between emperor and Pygoscelis penguins article info abstract Article history: Penguins play important roles in the biogeochemical cycle between Antarctic Ocean and land ecosystems. The Received 13 June 2013 roles of emperor penguin Aptenodytes forsteri, however, are usually ignored because emperor penguin breeds Received in revised form 26 August 2013 in fast sea ice. In this study, we collected two sediment profiles (EPI and PI) from the N island near a large emper- Accepted 26 August 2013 or penguin colony at Amanda Bay, East Antarctic and performed stable isotope and element analyses. The organic Available online xxxx C/N ratios and carbon and nitrogen isotopes suggested an autochthonous source of organic materials for the sed- δ13 − ‰ δ15 ‰ Editor: Frank Riget iments of EPI (C/N = 10.21 ± 0.28, n =17; C= 13.48 ± 0.50 , N = 8.35 ± 0.55 , n =4)andan allochthonous source of marine-derived organic materials for the sediments of PI (C/N = 6.15 ± 0.08, 13 15 Keywords: δ C=−26.85 ± 0.11‰, δ N = 21.21 ± 2.02‰, n = 20).
    [Show full text]
  • Larsemann Hills, East Antarctica Antarctic Specially Managed Area Management Plan
    Measure 15 (2014) Annex Larsemann Hills, East Antarctica Antarctic Specially Managed Area Management Plan 1. Introduction The Larsemann Hills are an ice-free area of approximately 40 km2 and the southernmost coastal ‘oasis’ in the Prydz Bay region of East Antarctica. Coastal ice-free areas are rare in Antarctica and as such the Larsemann Hills region is environmentally, scientifically and logistically significant. In 2007 the Larsemann Hills were designated an Antarctic Specially Managed Area (ASMA) in response to a joint nomination by Australia, China, India, Romania and the Russian Federation. The primary reason for designation was to promote coordination and cooperation by Parties in the planning and conduct of activities in the region – with the view to achieving greater environmental protection outcomes. The original management plan for Larsemann Hills ASMA No. 6 was adopted under Measure 2 (2007). The first review of the plan was completed in 2013. 1.1 Geography The Larsemann Hills are located approximately halfway between the Vestfold Hills and the Amery Ice Shelf on the south-eastern coast of Prydz Bay, Princess Elizabeth Land, East Antarctica (69o30’S, 76o19’58”E) (Map A). The ice-free area consists of two major peninsulas (Stornes and Broknes), four minor peninsulas, and approximately 130 near-shore islands. The eastern-most peninsula, Broknes, is further divided into western and eastern components by Nella Fjord. The closest significant ice-free areas are the Bølingen Islands (69o31’58”S, 75o42’E) 25 km to the south-west and the Rauer Islands (68 o50’59”S, 77o49’58”E) 60 km to the north-east.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 23/Friday, February 3
    Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 23 / Friday, February 3, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 5403 Applicable State Name of non-regulatory SIP revision geographic area submittal date EPA approval date Additional explanation ******* Documents Incorporated by Reference (9 VAC Statewide ..................... 5/25/11 2/3/12 [Insert page Addition of paragraphs 5–20–21, Section E.1.a.(1)). number where the (1)(a) and (1)(u). The document begins]. citations of all other paragraphs are re- vised. ******* [FR Doc. 2012–2334 Filed 2–2–12; 8:45 am] managed area (ASMA 7) and five principles underlying and requirements BILLING CODE 6560–50–P historical sites and monuments in of E.O. 12988 are not implicated. Antarctica (HSM 83–87). Federalism and Consultation and Public Participation NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Coordination With Indian Tribal The addition of these areas and sites Governments 45 CFR Part 670 merely reflects decisions already made by the Antarctic Treaty Parties at The Foundation has considered this Conservation of Antarctic Animals and various international ATCM meetings. final rule under the requirements of E.O. Plants Because these amendments involve a 13132 on federalism and has determined that the final rule conforms AGENCY: National Science Foundation. foreign affairs function, the provisions with the federalism principles set out in ACTION: Final rule. of Executive Order 12866 and the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. this E.O.; will not impose any SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Antarctic 553), requiring notice of proposed compliance costs on the States; and will Conservation Act of 1978, The National rulemaking, opportunity for public not have substantial direct effects on the Science Foundation (NSF) is amending participation, and delay in effective States, the relationship between the its regulations to reflect newly date, are inapplicable.
    [Show full text]
  • Jaarlijkse Bekendmaking Van De Lijst Van De Beschermde
    MONITEUR BELGE — 12.12.2017 − Ed. 2 — BELGISCH STAATSBLAD 110771 FEDERALE OVERHEIDSDIENST VOLKSGEZONDHEID, VEILIGHEID VAN DE VOEDSELKETEN EN LEEFMILIEU [C − 2017/31818] Jaarlijkse bekendmaking van de lijst van de beschermde gebieden en gerangschikte plaatsen en monumenten bedoelt in artikel 13, § 4, van de wet van 21 juli 2017 betreffende de milieubescherming en de regulering van de activiteiten op Antarctica onder de rechtsbe- voegdheid van België 1. Beschermde gebieden A. Speciaal beheerde Antarctische gebied (ASMA) N° Nom — Naam 1 Admiralty Bay, King George Island 2 McMurdo Dry Valleys, Southern Victoria Land 4 Deception Island 5 Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, South Pole 6 Larsemann Hills, East Antarctica 7 Southwest Anvers Island and Palmer Basin B. Zone spécialement protégéedel’Antarctique (ASPA) B. Speciaal beschermd Antarctisch gebied (ASPA) N° Nom — Naam 101 Taylor Rookery, Mac Robertson Land -2017 2 102 Rookery Islands, Holme Bay, Mac Robertson Land 1 - 103 Ardery Island and Odbert Island, Budd Coast, Wilkes Land, East Antarctica 2 1 104 Sabrina Island, Balleny Islands 105 Beaufort Island, McMurdo Sound, Ross Sea dd 106 Cape Hallett, Northern Victoria Land, Ross Sea 107 Emperor Island, Dion Islands, Marguerite Bay, Antarctic Peninsula 108 Green Island, Berthelot Islands, Antarctic Peninsula 109 Moe Island, South Orkney Islands 110 Lynch Island, South Orkney Islands 111 Southern Powell Island and adjacent islands, South Orkney Islands 112 Coppermine Peninsula, Robert Island, South Shetland Islands lgisch Staatsblad 113 Litchfield
    [Show full text]