DOCSLIB.ORG

Development of Lightweight Sharpies in NSW 1975 to 1985

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Development of Lightweight Sharpies in NSW 1975 to 1985 By Rolf Lunsmann, May 2007 The ten year period from 1975 to 1985 saw rapid and dramatic technological development in the Sharpie class. Known in 1975 as the Australian Lightweight Sharpie and firmly established as one of Australia’s most prominent and popular restricted development classes, the boats changed over that period from being exclusively plywood hulls with soft rigs to largely a fleet of full composite construction hulls with high tension, fully adjustable rigs, very similar to the boats that we see sailing today. The many individual changes and developments that led to the transformation came from the strong, competitive fleets that were sailed in all the States and Territories of Australia. Many significant developments were Crescendo VII (N35) winning the Nationals for NSW for the generated in South Australia where Robin first time in 1966 in the hands of Robert Thompson, Ian Haselgrove, the most prolific boatbuilder in the Peden and Chris Buckingham. (Photo uncredited) class, worked with the local fleet on the progressive development of glass hulled timber decked boats and in Tasmania where many of new rigging control systems emerged, but it was New South Wales that first saw much of the innovation and many of the breakthroughs in hull and spar development. The article attempts to chronicle some of those developments. The predominant thinking among top Sharpie sailors in NSW in the mid 1970s was heavily influenced by the success Mark Peelgrane had achieved in winning three consecutive National Championships between 1971 and 1973. Peelgrane had sailed a plywood boat Eleanor Rigby (N35). Eleanor Rigby had been built in 1966 and in its first season, sailing as Crescendo V11 and steered by Robert Thompson, with builder Ian Peden and Chris Buckingham as crew, had won the Nationals for NSW for the first time. These four major victories developed a near cult status for the boat and NSW Grant Simmer at the helm of Ship of Fools in Perth 1977. (Photo Australian Sailing) sailors desperately sought out similar hulls. Despite development of the first practical fibreglass Sharpie in 1975 by Robin (Macka) Haselgrove in South Australia, in NSW, backyards and garages were being searched for old Peden hulls to be restored for racing. A number of top skippers managed to find the prized Peden hulls and raced them with success. Edgar Roe won the Nationals in 1974 in Roeboat (N42) and in 1976 in Ostara (N35), Julian Golding finished second in 1976 in the University of NSW boat Mach 1 (N38) and then took on a remarkable dual 470/Sharpie campaign in Perth in 1977 in Upyz II (N39). Even into the late 1970s Peden hulls dominated the top end of the NSW fleet. Phil Durham acquired Tantivy (N37) from Sydney University, Graham Wallace with Geoff and Penny Dilworth purchased Mach 1 (N38) from University of NSW, Stuart Sommerville acquired Roeboat and renamed it Ophelia, Tony Love purchased Ralph House’s boat Houseboat (N50) and renamed it Hot Tip. In Canberra Ken Farrell was sailing Cheetah (N41) fast enough to win the NSW State Championship in 1980. The most successful of these Peden restorations was that of Grant Simmer who rebuilt N56 as Ship of Fools and sailed the boat to two National Championship victories in Perth in 1977 with Geoff Grover and Don Buckley and Sydney in 1979 with Geoff Grover and Greg Johns. Their sails were from Lee Sails, cut by sheethand Geoff Grover including the new, larger symmetric spinnakers that were introduced to the class in 1977. By the time of the Sydney nationals in 1979 there were still many of these ply boats, now up to 13 year old, with the old double digit, state based sail numbers, sailing competitively along side new ply and new fibreglass hulls carrying the new national sail numbers by then up to over 580. In 1978 Andrew Hun from Tasmania created technological breakthrough for the Sharpie class with his boat Dynamo Hum (T597) which won the Nationals held at Largs Bay in South Australia. Dynamo Hum was not only a fibreglass hull but also used the added stiffness of the hull construction to carry high rig tensions to tighten the forestay and reduce forestay sag. High rig tensions were not possible in the older ply boats. In response, two Sydney sailors Julian Golding and Geoff Comfort, working independently, each developed new fibreglass hulls that could take high rig tensions. Their boats for the 1978/79 season were documented by Bob Ross in his Australian Sailing article in 1 Andrew Hun’s Dynamo Hum represented a major November 1978. breakthrough when it won the Nationals at Largs Bay in 1978. (Photo Uncredited Australian Sailing) Golding’s boat, built with Mark Philips from Dinghy Sports, featured a fibreglass foam sandwich hull, with an innovative single moulding for the centrecase, centrecase support and front bulkhead. On the original boat, Heart of Glass the hull was finished with ply decks but later boats that season featured the first foam sandwich fibreglass decks on Sharpies making them the first all fibreglass boats in the class’s history. The 1 Ross, B., Australian Sailing, Yaffa Publishing, Sydney, November 1978, p28 hull mould had been produced by the NSW Sharpie Association a few years earlier in an attempt to develop an early solid glass Sharpie. Julian Golding’s first fibreglass hull featured a Julian Golding’s first fibreglass sharpie with single moulding for centrecase, frames and Needlespar mast and Seahorse sails in 1978. bulkhead. (Photo Bob Ross). (Photo Bob Ross). Golding, who was campaigning both a 470 and the Sharpie, started importing Parker 470 hulls from the UK, along with, Needlespar masts and Seahorse sails. He found in the Needlespar range, a section that worked well as a very flexible Sharpie mast. The Needlespars featured a specially tapered separate top section, produced through a sink drawing process, which was then bonded into the main tube, a practice that was new to Australia. The main tubes were typically 60mm diameter with 1.8mm walls and 2.3mm walls in the tips. They proved to be fast and popular. The first Comfort fibreglass Sharpie had an Stuart Sommerville used one of the flexible infamous “crew killer” alloy space-frame. Needlespars on Ophelia when he finished second to (Photo Bob Ross). Grant Simmer in the Perth nationals of 1977 showing great windward speed in the process. He also managed to demonstrate the fragility of the spar bending one in one of the windier heats. Comfort’s first boat, also built for the 1978/79 season was more radical. The hull was constructed in foam sandwich from the same NSW Association mould but the deck was aluminium and the boat featured distinctive “crew killer”, square section, aluminium framing to support the centrecase and rig loads. Christened Thirty Knuckle Shuffle (N607), it initially sported a very small section mast but this was soon replaced with a more conventional section. Julian Golding at the helm of N691 Goldilocks and the Free Wares (Photo Bob Ross) Neither of these two boats proved instant winners. Golding worked to progressively develop a full production all fibreglass boat with a number being built over the next couple of seasons, N621 for Sydney University and N623 for Gerry Clarke, Punk (N659) for Steve Gosling and Million Dollar Bill (N661) for Bill Haughton. A Night at the Opera (N693) was also built as a shell and centrecase for Ross Tilsed who finished the boat off with a ply deck of his own. There may have been others. At the Hobart nationals in 1980 Golding’s own boat Rock Lobster (N660), showed outstanding speed but misadventure, breakages and misfortune left them well down the final placings. A year later, the last of the Golding Sharpies, Goldilocks and the Free Wares (N691), sailed by Golding with Steve Quigley and Will Finlay finished in the top ten at the Port Melbourne nationals in the highest nationals placing for one of these all glass hulls. For the same nationals series Geoff Comfort’s boat had been fully rebuilt with the aluminium deck replaced with a more conventional foam sandwich glass deck and the boat fully re-fitted and re- rigged. The boat was re-named Forty Knuckle Shuffle to mark the added involvement of Phil Durham in its development. With Durham steering, Comfort on the sheet and Al Soars up front, the boat performed creditably at Port Melbourne without being truly competitive. The Port Melbourne nationals in 1980-81 marked a turning point for the NSW Sharpie fleet. Apart from Golding the NSW Sharpie fleet performed dismally with the next highest place being Steve Gosling who placed in the 20s. In response a number of crews made a determined, collective decision to improve their performance. This involved new boats, a new sail development program and most radically, a change in sailing venue. The long standing home of Sharpie sailing in Sydney had been Mosman Amateur Sailing Club but the Club’s racing area on Sydney Harbour had become progressively more crowded with yachts, ferries and 18ft skiffs on a Saturday afternoon. So much so that in the view of many of the Sharpie sailors it did not allow reasonable tight tactical racing and boat development. A group of crews within the fleet went searching for a new venue that could offer more open water, less disrupted breeze and less traffic. They settled on Sutherland Shire Sailing Club (SSSC) at Kurnell on the south-eastern corner of Botany Bay where they started a Sharpie division at the commencement of the 1981/82 season.
Recommended publications
  • The Junk Rig Glossary (JRG) Version 20 APR 2016

    The Junk Rig Glossary (JRG) Version 20 APR 2016

    The Junk Rig Glossary (JRG) Version 20 APR 2016 Welcome to the Junk Rig Glossary! The Junk Rig Glossary (JRG) is a Member Project of the Junk Rig Association, initiated by Bruce Weller who, as a then new member, found that he needed a junk 'dictionary’. The aim is to create a comprehensive and fully inclusive glossary of all terms pertaining to junk rig, its implementation and characteristics. It is intended to benefit all who are interested in junk rig, its history and on-going development. A goal of the JRG Project is to encourage a standard vocabulary to assist clarity of expression and understanding. Thus, where competing terms are in common use, one has generally been selected as standard (please see Glossary Conventions: Standard Versus Non-Standard Terms, below) This is in no way intended to impugn non-standard terms or those who favour them. Standard usage is voluntary, and such designations are wide open to review and change. Where possible, terminology established by Hasler and McLeod in Practical Junk Rig has been preferred. Where innovators have developed a planform and associated rigging, their terminology for innovative features is preferred. Otherwise, standards are educed, insofar as possible, from common usage in other publications and online discussion. Your participation in JRG content is warmly welcomed. Comments, suggestions and/or corrections may be submitted to [email protected], or via related fora. Thank you for using this resource! The Editors: Dave Zeiger Bruce Weller Lesley Verbrugge Shemaya Laurel Contents Some sections are not yet completed. ∙ Common Terms ∙ Common Junk Rigs ∙ Handy references Common Acronyms Formulae and Ratios Fabric materials Rope materials ∙ ∙ Glossary Conventions Participation and Feedback Standard vs.
  • USS CONSTELLATION Page 4 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    USS CONSTELLATION Page 4 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 USS CONSTELLATION Page 4 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form Summary The USS Constellation’s career in naval service spanned one hundred years: from commissioning on July 28, 1855 at Norfolk Navy Yard, Virginia to final decommissioning on February 4, 1955 at Boston, Massachusetts. (She was moved to Baltimore, Maryland in the summer of 1955.) During that century this sailing sloop-of-war, sometimes termed a “corvette,” was nationally significant for its ante-bellum service, particularly for its role in the effort to end the foreign slave trade. It is also nationally significant as a major resource in the mid-19th century United States Navy representing a technological turning point in the history of U.S. naval architecture. In addition, the USS Constellation is significant for its Civil War activities, its late 19th century missions, and for its unique contribution to international relations both at the close of the 19th century and during World War II. At one time it was believed that Constellation was a 1797 ship contemporary to the frigate Constitution moored in Boston. This led to a long-standing controversy over the actual identity of the Constellation. Maritime scholars long ago reached consensus that the vessel currently moored in Baltimore is the 1850s U.S. navy sloop-of-war, not the earlier 1797 frigate. Describe Present and Historic Physical Appearance. The USS Constellation, now preserved at Baltimore, Maryland, was built at the navy yard at Norfolk, Virginia.
  • The Sharpie –A Personal View 2009

    The Sharpie –A Personal View 2009

    The Sharpie –A Personal View 2009 THE SHARPIE - A PERSONAL VIEW BY MIKE WALLER This article was originally published in Australian Amateur Boat Builder Magazine * * * * * To say that all flat bottomed boats are Sharpies is to say that all animals with four legs are horses. The statement simply does not hold water. It is true that most sharpies have flat bottoms, but the Sharpie is a unique design style which evolved over a specific period of history to fill a particular need, and to which certain well defined rules of design apply. The initial statement also denies the individuality of a multitude of other distinct hull ‘types’ such as the many and varied dory hull forms, skiffs, punts and hunting boats, and ‘near flat bottomed’ boats such as skipjacks, (not all Sharpies have absolutely flat bottoms, for that matter,) which developed in tandem with the Sharpie. A common misconception is that the Sharpie originated in Europe. It is true that many flat bottomed boats have existed in Europe over the years, notably the ‘Metre Sharpies’, but to say that the Sharpie evolved in Europe would make such great figures as Howard Chapelle, the well known maritime historian, turn in his grave. While there will always be differing opinions, the accepted history of the traditional Sharpie as we know it, is that it evolved on the eastern seaboard of the United States of America in the Oyster fisheries of Connecticut. It is largely down to the efforts of Howard Chapelle, who spent a lifetime documenting the development of the simple working boats of the United States, that we can credit most of our current knowledge of the rules and characteristics which define the traditional Sharpie as a distinct vessel style.
  • Student Health Insurance Plan Faqs

    Student Health Insurance Plan Faqs

    Student Health Insurance Plan FAQs Table of Contents Student Health Insurance Plan (SHIP) Overview 1 Student Health Services (SHS) 3 Considering SHIP 5 SHIP Options: Basic and Plus 7 Waiving SHIP 8 Affordable Care Act (ACA) 9 Graduate Student Information: For Trainee Stipends 10 Recipients and Research Assistants, Research Fellows, Teaching Assistants, and Teaching Fellows Student Health Insurance Plan (SHIP) Overview Q: What is the Student Health Insurance Plan (SHIP)? A: SHIP is Boston University’s insurance plan for students, offered through Aetna, a large national health insurer. Q: Who is eligible for SHIP? A: Most students who attend Boston University are eligible for SHIP. Q: Am I automatically enrolled in SHIP? A: Full-time, three-quarter time, and international undergraduate and graduate students are automatically enrolled in SHIP Basic coverage. Part-time students in degree- granting programs will need to enroll. Students on campuses other than the Charles River Campus may be automatically enrolled in the Plus option; consult your program administrator for details. Post-Doctoral Fellows are eligible to voluntarily enroll in the plan. Please contact the Post-Doctoral Professional Development and Post-Doctoral Affairs Office at [email protected] to obtain an enrollment application. Q: Can I waive SHIP coverage? A: Depending on your insurance, you may be able to waive SHIP coverage if you have other coverage that meets ACA requirements. See the Affordable Care Act (ACA) section of this FAQs document to learn more about ACA requirements. Page 1 2021/22 Student Health Insurance Plan FAQs The chart below indicates which student types may waive their SHIP coverageand under what circumstances this waiver is permitted.
  • SHALLOW BOATS; DEEP ADVENTURES! Since 1984

    SHALLOW BOATS; DEEP ADVENTURES! Since 1984

    Since 1984 SHALLOW BOATS; DEEP ADVENTURES! 1 SHOAL DRAFT STABILITY, SIMPLICITY, SPEED AND SAFETY. I’m here to talk about a belief in and a passion for shoal-draft boats, particularly the development of the Round Bottomed Sharpie. I started sailing in centreboard dinghies and that excitement has returned with these boats. As you’ll see these 2 boats have become known as Presto Boats. NEW HAVEN OYSTER- TONGING SHARPIE By definition a Sharpie is a flat-bottomed boat and a New Haven oyster-tonging sharpie looked like this. They were easy to build with their box shape & simple rigs but the boat is an ingenious piece of function and efficiency. The stern is round so the tongs don’t snag on transom corners; the freeboard is low so it’s easy to swing the tongs on board and the long centreboard trunk stops the oysters from shifting SEA OF ABACO 3 under sail. NEW HAVEN SHARPIE RIG The unstayed masts rotate through 360 degrees so the oystermen would sail to windward of the oyster beds and let the sails stream out over the bow while drifting over the beds tonging away. The sails are self-tending and self-vanged so handling is very easy. The boats are fast when loaded so you can get the oysters fresh to market. Oyster bars in big cities were the Starbucks of the late 1800s. You’d pop in for a ½ dozen as a pick-me-up. 4 On the right is an Outward Bound 30 to our design. With our contemporary Sharpies we’ve retained the principles of the traditional rig; it works as well today as it did in the 1800s.
  • Coast Guard Cutter Seamanship Manual

    Coast Guard Cutter Seamanship Manual

    U.S. Department of Homeland Security United States Coast Guard COAST GUARD CUTTER SEAMANSHIP MANUAL COMDTINST M3120.9 November 2020 Commandant US Coast Guard Stop 7324 United States Coast Guard 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave SE Washington, DC 20593-7324 Staff Symbol: (CG-751) Phone: (202) 372-2330 COMDTINST M3120.9 04 NOV 2020 COMMANDANT INSTRUCTION M3120.9 Subj: COAST GUARD CUTTER SEAMANSHIP MANUAL Ref: (a) Risk Management (RM), COMDTINST 3500.3 (series) (b) Rescue and Survival Systems Manual, COMDTINST M10470.10 (series) (c) Cutter Organization Manual, COMDTINST M5400.16 (series) (d) Naval Engineering Manual, COMDTINST M9000.6 (series) (e) Naval Ships' Technical Manual (NSTM), Wire and Fiber Rope and Rigging, Chapter 613 (f) Naval Ships’ Technical Manual (NSTM), Mooring and Towing, Chapter 582 (g) Cutter Anchoring Operations Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTP), CGTTP 3-91.19 (h) Cutter Training and Qualification Manual, COMDTINST M3502.4 (series) (i) Shipboard Side Launch and Recovery Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTP), CGTTP 3-91.25 (series) (j) Shipboard Launch and Recovery: WMSL 418’ Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTP), CGTTP 3-91.7 (series) (k) Naval Ships’ Technical Manual (NSTM), Boats and Small Craft, Chapter 583 (l) Naval Ship’s Technical Manual (NSTM), Cranes, Chapter 589 (m) Cutter Astern Fueling at Sea (AFAS) Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTP), CGTTP 3-91.20 (n) Helicopter Hoisting for Non-Flight Deck Vessels, Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTP), CGTTP 3-91.26 (o) Flight Manual USCG Series
  • Evidence from Ancient Indian Art

    Evidence from Ancient Indian Art

    Antiquity of Sailing Ships of the IndianOcean: Evidence from ancient Indian art Dr. Alok Tripathi Underwater Archaeology Wing Archaeological Survey of India ndia has an exceptionally varied and rich art heritage. Varieties of themes depicted in art throw light on various aspects of human history. A number of ships, including sailing ships, have been found depicted in ancient Indian art in the form of terracotta models, Ibas-reliefs, seals, sealing and plaques, paintings on pots and walls, sculptural panels, represen- tation on coins, etc. These representations of ships are in different art media and are widely spread in time, from prehistoric period to the recent past, and space. Such representations in art reveal useful information about the use of sails and development of sailing ships through the ages. The ancient Indian art tradition was not confined to India but also spread as far as Southeast Asia. A systematic study of these representations may help to reconstruct the long maritime history in the Indian Ocean. Although, archaeological explorations and excavations conducted in India so far have not yielded many ancient boats or ships, some of the excavated structures have been identified as evidence of maritime activities during the ancient period. In the absence of sufficient archae- ological evidence it is difficult to reconstruct the long maritime history of the subcontinent having the most prominent position in the Indian Ocean. Systematic study of archaeological evidence, literary references and the study of ancient representations may contribute signifi- cantly to the understanding of the evolution and development of shipping and shipbuilding technology. Representations of ships and boats in Indian art also provide a continuous histo- ry of shipping in India from the Mesolithic to the recent period.(1) Some of the depictions exhibit the actual picture of ships of those days.
  • Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress

    Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress

    Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress September 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL32665 Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The current and planned size and composition of the Navy, the annual rate of Navy ship procurement, the prospective affordability of the Navy’s shipbuilding plans, and the capacity of the U.S. shipbuilding industry to execute the Navy’s shipbuilding plans have been oversight matters for the congressional defense committees for many years. In December 2016, the Navy released a force-structure goal that calls for achieving and maintaining a fleet of 355 ships of certain types and numbers. The 355-ship goal was made U.S. policy by Section 1025 of the FY2018 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 2810/P.L. 115- 91 of December 12, 2017). The Navy and the Department of Defense (DOD) have been working since 2019 to develop a successor for the 355-ship force-level goal. The new goal is expected to introduce a new, more distributed fleet architecture featuring a smaller proportion of larger ships, a larger proportion of smaller ships, and a new third tier of large unmanned vehicles (UVs). On June 17, 2021, the Navy released a long-range Navy shipbuilding document that presents the Biden Administration’s emerging successor to the 355-ship force-level goal. The document calls for a Navy with a more distributed fleet architecture, including 321 to 372 manned ships and 77 to 140 large UVs. A September 2021 Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report estimates that the fleet envisioned in the document would cost an average of between $25.3 billion and $32.7 billion per year in constant FY2021 dollars to procure.
  • U.S. Navy Ships-Of-The-Line

    U.S. Navy Ships-Of-The-Line

    U.S. Navy – Ships-of-the-line A Frigate vs A Ship-of-the-Line: What’s the difference? FRIGATE: A vessel of war which is: 1) “ship” rigged, i.e. – with at least three masts (fore, main, & mizzen) & each mast carries the horizontal yards from which the principle sails are set; 2) this “ship-rigged vessel of war” is a FRIGATE because it has one covered, principle gun deck – USS Constitution is therefore a FRIGATE by class (illus. left) SHIP-OF-THE-LINE: A vessel of war which is: 1) “ship” rigged (see above); 2) this “ship-rigged vessel of war” is a SHIP-OF-THE-LINE because it has two or more covered gun decks – HMS Victory is therefore a SHIP-OF-THE-LINE by class (illus. right) HMS Victory (1765); 100+ guns; 820 officers Constitution preparing to battle Guerriere, & crew; oldest commissioned warship in the M.F. Corne, 1812 – PEM Coll. world, permanently dry docked in England Pg. 1 NMM Coll. An Act, 2 January 1813 – for the construction of the U.S. Navy’s first Ships-of-the-line USS Independence was the first ship-of-the-line launched for the USN from the Boston (Charlestown) Navy Yard on 22 June 1814: While rated for 74-guns, Independence was armed with 87 guns when she was launched. USS Washington was launched at the Portsmouth Navy Yard, 1 October 1814 USS Pennsylvania – largest sailing warship built for the USN USS Pennsylvania – rated for 136 guns on three covered gun decks + guns on her upper (spar) deck – the largest sailing warship ever built.
  • The Cost of the Navy's New Frigate

    The Cost of the Navy's New Frigate

    OCTOBER 2020 The Cost of the Navy’s New Frigate On April 30, 2020, the Navy awarded Fincantieri Several factors support the Navy’s estimate: Marinette Marine a contract to build the Navy’s new sur- face combatant, a guided missile frigate long designated • The FFG(X) is based on a design that has been in as FFG(X).1 The contract guarantees that Fincantieri will production for many years. build the lead ship (the first ship designed for a class) and gives the Navy options to build as many as nine addi- • Little if any new technology is being developed for it. tional ships. In this report, the Congressional Budget Office examines the potential costs if the Navy exercises • The contractor is an experienced builder of small all of those options. surface combatants. • CBO estimates the cost of the 10 FFG(X) ships • An independent estimate within the Department of would be $12.3 billion in 2020 (inflation-adjusted) Defense (DoD) was lower than the Navy’s estimate. dollars, about $1.2 billion per ship, on the basis of its own weight-based cost model. That amount is Other factors suggest the Navy’s estimate is too low: 40 percent more than the Navy’s estimate. • The costs of all surface combatants since 1970, as • The Navy estimates that the 10 ships would measured per thousand tons, were higher. cost $8.7 billion in 2020 dollars, an average of $870 million per ship. • Historically the Navy has almost always underestimated the cost of the lead ship, and a more • If the Navy’s estimate turns out to be accurate, expensive lead ship generally results in higher costs the FFG(X) would be the least expensive surface for the follow-on ships.
  • The MARINER's MIRROR the JOURNAL of ~Ht ~Ocitt~ for ~Autical ~Tstarch

    The MARINER's MIRROR the JOURNAL of ~Ht ~Ocitt~ for ~Autical ~Tstarch

    The MARINER'S MIRROR THE JOURNAL OF ~ht ~ocitt~ for ~autical ~tstarch. Antiquities. Bibliography. Folklore. Organisation. Architecture. Biography. History. Technology. Art. Equipment. Laws and Customs. &c., &c. Vol. III., No. 3· March, 1913. CONTENTS FOR MARCH, 1913. PAGE PAGE I. TWO FIFTEENTH CENTURY 4· A SHIP OF HANS BURGKMAIR. FISHING VESSELS. BY R. BY H. H. BRINDLEY • • 8I MORTON NANCE • • . 65 5. DocuMENTS, "THE MARINER's 2. NOTES ON NAVAL NOVELISTS. MIRROUR" (concluded.) CON· BY OLAF HARTELIE •• 7I TRIBUTED BY D. B. SMITH. 8S J. SOME PECULIAR SWEDISH 6. PuBLICATIONS RECEIVED . 86 COAST-DEFENCE VESSELS 7• WORDS AND PHRASES . 87 OF THE PERIOD I]62-I8o8 (concluded.) BY REAR­ 8. NOTES . • 89 ADMIRAL J. HAGG, ROYAL 9· ANSWERS .. 9I SwEDISH NAVY •• 77 IO. QUERIES .. 94 SOME OLD-TIME SHIP PICTURES. III. TWO FIFTEENTH CENTURY FISHING VESSELS. BY R. MORTON NANCE. WRITING in his Glossaire Nautique, concerning various ancient pictures of ships of unnamed types that had come under his observation, Jal describes one, not illustrated by him, in terms equivalent to these:- "The work of the engraver, Israel van Meicken (end of the 15th century) includes a ship of handsome appearance; of middling tonnage ; decked ; and bearing aft a small castle that has astern two of a species of turret. Her rounded bow has a stem that rises up with a strong curve inboard. Above the hawseholes and to starboard of the stem is placed the bowsprit, at the end 66 SOME OLD·TIME SHIP PICTURES. of which is fixed a staff terminating in an object that we have seen in no other vessel, and that we can liken only to a many­ rayed monstrance.
  • Visby-Class Corvettes VISBY-CLASS CORVETTES

    Visby-Class Corvettes VISBY-CLASS CORVETTES

    Visby-class corvettes VISBY-CLASS CORVETTES Visby-class corvettes Virtually invisible in all signature bands, the innovative and powerful Visby-class corvettes from Saab continues to set the world benchmark for littoral fighting ships. Stealth, shallow draught, speed and fighting power makes Visby-class corvette a truly formidable surface combatant in the littoral arena. Visby-class corvette is a flexible surface combatant, designed for a wide range of roles: anti-surface warfare (ASuW), anti-submarine warfare (ASW), mine countermeasures (MCM), patrol and much more. Gone are the days when the mere firepower of a ship was sufficient for its own protection. The concept today is action before – or even without – being detected. All-carbon fibre The all-composite carbon-fibre sandwich hull and superstructure allows the 650-ton Visby- class corvette the same payload capacity as that of a steel ship. At the same the carbon-fibre Visby-class corvette’s all-composite carbon- means that the Visby-class corvette has at least fibre hull and superstructure is not only lighter a 50% reduction in displacement compared with than steel, but also comparable for fire resistance a steel ship. and ballistic properties, and superior to steel for Resulting combat advantages are: higher speed vulnerability to blast and underwater explosions. for the same power as conventional metal ship of In terms of life cycle costs, the carbon-fibre com- the same dimensions, as well as greater manoeu- posite is entirely superior to steel and aluminium vrability and shallower draught – both important for fatigue. And the superior corrosion resistance tactical considerations in littoral waters.