Architectural Styles in Spain.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Aynemateriality, Crafting, and Scale in Renaissance
Materiality, Crafting, and Scale in Renaissancealin Architecture a ayne Alina Payne Materiality, Crafting, and Scale in Renaissance Architecture1 Alina Payne 1. This article draws from a series of lectures given at the INHA and EPHE, Paris in June 2008 and will form a part of my upcoming book on the Materiality of Architecture in the Renaissance.Iam On the whole twentieth-century Renaissance architectural scholarship has paid grateful to Sabine Frommel who first gave me the little attention to architecture’s dialogue with the other arts, in particular with opportunity to address this material by inviting 2 me to Paris, and to Maria Loh and Patricia Rubin sculpture and the so-called minor arts. The fact that architects were also for inviting me to develop this argument further. painters, sculptors, decorators, and designers of festivals and entries, as well I am also grateful to David Kim, Maria Loh, and as makers of a multitude of objects from luxury items to machines, clocks, the anonymous reviewers who offered very useful measuring and lifting instruments, in many different materials has also comments to an earlier draft. dropped out of attention. Indeed, broadly involved in the world of objects – 2. Among the last publications to take a holistic large and small, painted or drawn, carved or poured – architects were view of Renaissance architecture was Julius Baum, Baukunst und dekorative Plastik der fru¨heren highly conversant with a variety of artistic media that raise the question as to Renaissance in Italien (J. Hoffman: Stuttgart, what these experiences contributed to the making of buildings. For example, 1926). -
En Torno a Juan De Herrera Y La Arquitectura
EN TORNO A JUAN DE HERRERA Y LA ARQUITECTURA por Agustín Bustamante García Después del ingente esfuerzo llevado a cabo por Iñiguez Almech sobre el problema de Herrera y El Escorial, el proceso de edificación de la gran fábrica quedaba dilucidado, pero seguía en pie el arduo problema de las obras de Madrid de Felipe II, Hace veintiséis años, el ilustre estudioso publicó un largo artículo sobre las reformas del Madrid de Felipe II en el que se veía de alguna forma la sombra de Herrera, fundamentalmente en la Plaza Mayor, pero el problema quedaba en pie y el mismo Iñiguez obraba con cautela ante la cuestión ^ Se conoce por los testimonios exhumados de diferentes archivos, que en la época de Felipe II se acometió con ambición una vasta reforma del que hoy se denomina Madrid de los Austrias, pero ¿quién era el cerebro de obra de tal envergadura? En 1952, Amando Portábales Pichel publica un libro donde pone en entredicho la labor arquitectónica de Herrera ^ y la base mas firme de la intervención del arquitecto real en Madrid que se basa en el Puente Nuevo de la Segoviana y Puerta de Guadalajara documental- mente parece que no es suyo. Desde esa fecha se entra en un punto muerto. Siguiendo la pista del arquitecto vallisoletano Juan de Nates y sus vin culaciones con Madrid, hemos encontrado un «corpus» documental que permite replantearnos de nuevo la situación de las reformas de Madrid y dejar claro el lugar de Herrera en ellas. El 19 de abril de 1586, en la villa de Madrid, «el sr. -
The Architectural Style of Bay Pines VAMC
The Architectural Style of Bay Pines VAMC Lauren Webb July 2011 The architectural style of the original buildings at Bay Pines VA Medical Center is most often described as “Mediterranean Revival,” “Neo-Baroque,” or—somewhat rarely—“Churrigueresque.” However, with the shortage of similar buildings in the surrounding area and the chronological distance between the facility’s 1933 construction and Baroque’s popularity in the 17th and 18th centuries, it is often wondered how such a style came to be chosen for Bay Pines. This paper is an attempt to first, briefly explain the Baroque and Churrigueresque styles in Spain and Spanish America, second, outline the renewal of Spanish-inspired architecture in North American during the early 20th century, and finally, indicate some of the characteristics in the original buildings which mark Bay Pines as a Spanish Baroque- inspired building. The Spanish Baroque and Churrigueresque The Baroque style can be succinctly defined as “a style of artistic expression prevalent especially in the 17th century that is marked by use of complex forms, bold ornamentation, and the juxtaposition of contrasting elements.” But the beauty of these contrasting elements can be traced over centuries, particularly for the Spanish Baroque, through the evolution of design and the input of various cultures living in and interacting with Spain over that time. Much of the ornamentation of the Spanish Baroque can be traced as far back as the twelfth century, when Moorish and Arabesque design dominated the architectural scene, often referred to as the Mudéjar style. During the time of relative peace between Muslims, Christians, and Jews in Spain— the Convivencia—these Arabic designs were incorporated into synagogues and cathedrals, along with mosques. -
Renaissance Architecture History of Architecture
Renaissance Architecture History of Architecture No’man Bayaty Introduction • The Renaissance movement was a grand scale movement in art, literature sculpture and architecture. • The time in which it spread between 15th century and 17th century, was a time of movement in philosophy, science and other ideas. • At this time Europe was made of many small states united or trying to get united under larger kingdoms. • The Italian cities were independent, each with its special culture. • The Holy Roman Empire was quite weak, and the so were the Popes. • Local cultures were rising, so were local national states. • Europe lost Constantinople in 1453 A. D. but got all of Spain back. Introduction • Scientific achievements were getting more realistic, getting away from the mystical and superstitious ideas of the medieval ages. • The Christian reformation led by Martin Luther in 1517 A.D. added more division to the already divided Europe. • Galileo (1564 – 1642 A. D.) proved the earth was not the center of the universe, but a small dot in a grand solar system. • Three inventions had a great influence, gunpowder, printing and the marine compass. Introduction Introduction • Renaissance started in Italy. • The Gothic architecture never got a firm hold in Italy. • Many things aided the Italians to start the Renaissance, the resentment to Gothic, the discovery of new classical ruins and the presence of great Roman structures. • The movement in art and sculpture started a century before architecture. • The movement was not a gradual development from the Gothic, like the Gothic did from Romanesque, but was a bit more sudden and more like a conscious choice by artists and architects. -
Romanesque Renaissance – Introduction
Romanesque Renaissance – Introduction Konrad Ottenheym ‘Look at this majestic building with all its columns, and now you can imagine how many slaves these Roman emperors must have used to build it!’, I heard a tourist guide explaining to his group on the Piazza Venezia in Rome in 2016, as he pointed to the imposing marble monument to Vittorio Emanuele II. The Altare della Patria, symbol of the unified Italian kingdom of the nineteenth cen- tury, is in fact barely a century old, having been built in 1895–1911.1 Apparently, even in our time it is not always easy to make out the refined differences be- tween genuine ancient Roman architecture and later works of art which were meant to create a visual connection with the glorious past. Erroneous dating of old buildings, interpreting them as far older than they actually are, has hap- pened in all centuries. From the fifteenth century onwards, antiquarians, humanist scholars, ar- chitects and artists, striving for a revival of the architectural forms and prin- ciples of Ancient Rome, investigated respectable ruins and age-old buildings in order to look for useful models and sources of inspiration. They too, oc- casionally misinterpreted younger buildings as proofs of majestic Roman or other ancient glory. This especially was assumed for buildings that were con- sciously inspired by ancient Roman architecture, such as the buildings of the Carolingian, Ottonian and Stauffer emperors. But even if the correct age of a certain building was known (Charlemagne’s Palatine Chapel in Aachen, for example), buildings from c. 800–1200 were sometimes regarded as ‘Antique’ architecture, since the concept of ‘Antiquity’ was far more stretched than our modern periodisation allows. -
The Architecture of the Italian Renaissance
•••••••• ••• •• • .. • ••••---• • • - • • ••••••• •• ••••••••• • •• ••• ••• •• • •••• .... ••• .. .. • .. •• • • .. ••••••••••••••• .. eo__,_.. _ ••,., .... • • •••••• ..... •••••• .. ••••• •-.• . PETER MlJRRAY . 0 • •-•• • • • •• • • • • • •• 0 ., • • • ...... ... • • , .,.._, • • , - _,._•- •• • •OH • • • u • o H ·o ,o ,.,,,. • . , ........,__ I- .,- --, - Bo&ton Public ~ BoeMft; MA 02111 The Architecture of the Italian Renaissance ... ... .. \ .- "' ~ - .· .., , #!ft . l . ,."- , .• ~ I' .; ... ..__ \ ... : ,. , ' l '~,, , . \ f I • ' L , , I ,, ~ ', • • L • '. • , I - I 11 •. -... \' I • ' j I • , • t l ' ·n I ' ' . • • \• \\i• _I >-. ' • - - . -, - •• ·- .J .. '- - ... ¥4 "- '"' I Pcrc1·'· , . The co11I 1~, bv, Glacou10 t l t.:• lla l'on.1 ,111d 1 ll01nc\ S t 1, XX \)O l)on1c111c. o Ponrnna. • The Architecture of the Italian Renaissance New Revised Edition Peter Murray 202 illustrations Schocken Books · New York • For M.D. H~ Teacher and Prie11d For the seamd edillo11 .I ltrwe f(!U,riucu cerurir, passtJgts-,wwbly thOS<' on St Ptter's awl 011 Pnlladfo~ clmrdses---mul I lr,rvl' takeu rhe t>pportrmil)' to itJcorporate m'1U)1 corrt·ctfons suggeSLed to nu.• byfriet1ds mu! re11iewers. T'he publishers lwvc allowed mr to ddd several nt•w illusrra,fons, and I slumld like 10 rltank .1\ Ir A,firlwd I Vlu,.e/trJOr h,'s /Jelp wft/J rhe~e. 711f 1,pporrrm,ty /t,,s 11/so bee,r ft1ke,; Jo rrv,se rhe Biblfogmpl,y. Fc>r t/Jis third edUfor, many r,l(lre s1m1II cluu~J!eS lwvi: been m"de a,,_d the Biblio,~raphy has (IJICt more hN!tl extet1si11ely revised dtul brought up to date berause there has l,een mt e,wrmc>uJ incretlJl' ;,, i111eres1 in lt.1lim, ,1rrhi1ea1JrP sittr<• 1963,. wlte-,r 11,is book was firs, publi$hed. It sh<>uld be 110/NI that I haw consistc11tl)' used t/1cj<>rm, 1./251JO and 1./25-30 to 111e,w,.firs1, 'at some poiHI betwt.·en 1-125 nnd 1430', .md, .stamd, 'begi,miug ilJ 1425 and rnding in 14.10'. -
Th E a G a K H a N P Ro G R a M F O R Is La M Ic a R C H
THE AGA KHAN PROGRAM FOR ISLAMIC ARCHITECTURE 8issue AKPIA AKTC Established in 1979, the Aga Khan Pro- Buildings and public spaces are grams for Islamic Architecture (AKPIA) at physical manifestations of culture in Harvard University and at the Massa- societies both past and present. They chusetts Institute of Technology are sup- represent human endeavors that can ported by endowments for instruction, enhance the quality of life, foster self- akpia research, and student aid from His High- understanding and community values, THE AGA KHANTRUST FOR CULTURE ness the Aga Khan. AKPIA is dedicated to and expand opportunities for economic aktc the study of Islamic architecture, urban- and social development into the 2 0 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 ism, visual culture, and conservation, in future. The Aga Khan Trust for Culture an effort to respond to the cultural and (AKTC) is an integral part of the Aga features: educational needs of a diverse constitu- Khan Development Network (AKDN), Harvard HAA ency drawn from all over the world. a family of institutions created by His Activities p. 2 Highness the Aga Khan with distinct yet People p. 8 Along with the focus on improving the complementary mandates to improve teaching of Islamic art and architecture the welfare and prospects of people Harvard GSD Activities p. 20 and setting a standard of excellence in in countries of the developing world, People p. 27 professional research, AKPIA also con- particularly in Asia and Africa. tinually strives to promote visibility of MIT Activities p. 33 the pan-Islamic cultural heritage. Though their spheres of activity and People p. -
De Juan De Herrera, Y La Idea De El Escorial Juan José Lahuerta
ARQUITECTURA El "Séptimo diseño", de Juan de Herrera, y la idea de El Escorial Juan José Lahuerta •l •. - ·- ,. Juan de H errera. Proyecto para la fachada del templo de El Escorial. Calcada del original por El Escorial. Patio de los R eyes y fa chada del A . R uíz de Arcaute, 1936. templo. odemos iniciar nuestra compren en la fachada principal o de arcos en los cual se acordarán con seguridad cuales sión de El· Escorial observando claustrillos, los sistemas de pilastras y quiera mutaciones que se hicieren" (4). P atentamente aquella que es toda semicolumnas, los capiteles, los esta bl a Y d igo q ue tal cosa ocurre en el dibujo vía su mejor ilustración: la estampa del mentos, las decenas ele chimeneas y bu porque sólo en él, en razón ele su cuali séptimo de los diseños que Francisco de hardas en los tejados, comproba ndo la dad universal, puede comprobarse la to Mora y el mismo Juan de Herrera reali perfección con la que la menor moldu tal simetría del edificio y, al m ismo tiem zaron de la obra, y que Petrus Perret ra, el más leve cambio ele material se ha po, las mutaciones que esa si me tría asu grabó en 1587. cuyo título es SCENO hecho presente. me: así la aparición de la cubierta de la GRAPHIA TOTIVS FABRICAE S. Pero no sólo eso. gra n escalera ocultando parte del claus LAVRENTII IN ESCORIAL! ( 1). Tambi én lo es el ir descubriendo có• tro de los evangelistas; la diferen te com En primer lugar porque ella es, efecti mo el diseñ o se ha mostrado fi el a la posición de claustros y patios a ambos vamente, escenografía, es decir, una total realidad ele la construcción incluso en lados del templo; la aparición de las y perfecta delineación perspectiva del ob aquellos lugares en los que podemos balaustradas que coronan las naves con jeto Escorial y, por tanto, junto con el comprobar, en la obra realizada, modifi las q ue se divide en tres el gran patio resto de las láminas, el más original do caciones res pecto a los iniciales deseos cuadrado del palacio .. -
Architecture). Italian Renaissance Architect Based Their Theories and Practices on Classical Roman Example. the Renais
John - )Architecture). Italian Renaissance architect based their theories and practices on Classical Roman example. The Renaissance revival of Classical Rome was as important in architecture as it was in literature. A pilgrimage to Rome to study the ancient buildings and ruins, especially the Coliseum and Pantheon, was considered essential to an an architect’s training. Classical orders and architectural elements such as columns, pilasters, pediments, entablatures, arches, and domes form the vocabulary of Renaissance buildings. Vitruvius’s writing on architecture also influenced the Renaissance definition of beauty in architecture. As a classical world, Renaissance architecture is characterized by harmonious form, mathematical proportion, and a unit of measurement based on the human scale. During the Renaissance, architects trained as humanist helped raised the statues of their profession from skilled labor to artist. They hope to create structures that would both appeal to both emotion and reason. Three key figures in Renaissance architecture were Filippo Brunelleschi, Leon Battista Alberti, and Andrea Palladio. (Brunelleschi) Filippo Brunelleschi (1377–1446) is widely considered the first Renaissance architect. Trained as a goldsmith in his native city of Florence, Brunelleschi soon turned his interests to architecture, traveling to Rome to study ancient buildings. Among his greatest accomplishments is the engineering of the dome of Florence Cathedral (Santa Maria del Fiore also known as the Duomo). He was also the first since antiquity to use the classical orders Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian in a consistent and appropriate manner. (Literature) In the early Renaissance, especially in Italy, much of the focus was on translating and studying classic works from Latin and Greek. -
El Doctus Artifex En El Entorno De Felipe 11: Institucionalizaci~Nde La Ciencia, Bibl,Iofilia Y Ascenso Social
EL DOCTUS ARTIFEX EN EL ENTORNO DE FELIPE 11: INSTITUCIONALIZACI~NDE LA CIENCIA, BIBL,IOFILIA Y ASCENSO SOCIAL RAMOX SOLERI FABREGAT Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona RESUMEN Al servicio de Felipe 11 aparecen por primera vez en España los profesionales mechnicos (ingenieros, arquitectos, pintores) con formación literaria. Sus bibliotecas muestran sus estrategias de ascenso social, a pesar de la decadencia científica española. RESUM:El Doctus Artifex en l'entorn de Felip II: institucionalització de la ciencia, bibliofilia i ascens social Al servei de Felip 11 apareixen per primera vegada a Espanya els professionals mechics (ingeniers, arquitectes, pintors) amb formació literaria. Les seves biblioteques mostren les seves estrategies d'ascens social, malgrat la decadencia científica espanyola. SUMMARY:The Doctus Artifex in the Court of Philip II of Spain: the institucionalization ofscience, bibliography and social promotion The mechanic professionals (engineers, architects, painters) with literary training appear in Spain for the first time at the service of Philip 11. Their libraries show their social ascent strategies, despite the Spanish scientific decadence. La enseñanza tecnológica Quizá ninguna rémora pesó más en el desarrollo de la ciencia moderna que el viejo prejuicio en favor de las actividades intelectuales y en contra de las mecánicas. Las enseiianzas tecnológicas no tenían lugar en las universidades españolas del siglo XVI, y las ciencias del mundo natural (a excepción de la medicina) apenas atra,ían al alumnado.' La anatomía era casi la única disciplina que podía interesar a los artistas: el orfebre y escultor Juan de Arfe (De varia cornmensuración para la esculptura y architectura, Sevilla, 1585) asegura haber asistido a disecciones (en la universidad de Salamanca. -
Baroque Architecture Through a Century of Art Historiography and Politics
From ‘bad’ to ‘good’: Baroque architecture through a century of art historiography and politics Review of: Evonne Levy, Baroque and the Political Language of Formalism (1845-1945): Burckhardt, Wölfflin, Gurlitt, Brinckmann, Sedlmayr, 400 pp., 42 ills, Basel: Schwabe, 2015. € 68, ISBN 978-3-7965-3396-9 Marco M. Mascolo Among the theoretical patterns that shaped art history between the nineteenth and twentieth century, formalism has undoubtedly a central place, with the turning point of Heinrich Wölfflin’s publication of the Kunstgeschichtliche Grundbegriffe (Principles of Art History) in 1915, which offered practical tools to interpret works of art on the basis of the historical forms of sight.1 One of the crucial contributions of early twentieth-century German formalist scholars was the creation of the conditions to reconcile modernity with the Baroque. Directing her attention to the architectural historiography of the Baroque from 1845 to 1945, Evonne Levy points out that ‘political circumstances pressed those who studied the history of art to compare that epoch [i.e. the seventeenth century] to their own’.2 The temporal frame defines a century that had, at its beginning, Jacob Burckhardt’s entry ‘Jesuitenstil’ for the ninth edition of the Conversations-Lexikon3 (chapter one) and, at its end, the downfall of Hitler’s Third Reich, with the consequent scrutiny on methods compromised with the National Socialist regime, as in the case of art-historical works of Albert Erick Brinckmann (chapter four) and the Austrian Hans Sedlmayr (chapter five).4 In the middle, the book follows the ideas of two of the most important baroquists of the first half of the twentieth century: Heinrich Wölfflin (chapter two) and Cornelius Gurlitt (chapter three). -
The Royal Monastery of San Lorenzo De El Escorial
The Royal Monastery of San Lorenzo de El Escorial The Royal Monastery of San Lorenzo de El Escorial was built by Philip II in the 16th century and served as a royal palace, monastery and necropolis for numerous Spanish kings. The “El Escorial” is one of the most important visitor sites in Spain. Philip II wished to commemorate the Spanish victory in the battle of St. Quentin, fought on August 10th 1557 on St. Lawrence’s day. As Philip II was devoted to this Saint he decided to build the monastery as a royal pantheon. The king decided to found a religious institution to house the pantheon of his entire dynasty, together with a place of worship, a royal palace, a community of Hieronymite monks, a seminary and a library. The Monastery took twenty-one years to be built (from 1563 to 1584). In the beginning the work was directed by Juan Bautista de Toledo, but following Toledo’s premature death in 1567, his pupil Juan de Herrera began to excel as supervisor of the works. Herrera took over the direction and changed it somewhat into his own personal style. THE ROYAL MAUSOLEUM Philip II wanted to build a crypt below the High Altar, destined for a Royal Pantheon. But he died before his wish was accomplished, and it was his son, Philip III, who fulfilled his father’s desire. Works started in 1617 under the direction of the architect Juan Gómez de Mora. On his death, the work was already well advanced but the project remained unfinished for twenty-two years.