DOCSLIB.ORG

Cooperation Across Timescales Between and Hebbian and Homeostatic Plasticity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cooperation Across Timescales Between and Hebbian and Homeostatic Plasticity This position paper has not been peer reviewed or edited. It will be finalized, reviewed and edited after the Royal Society meeting on ‘Integrating Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity’ (April 2016). Cooperation across timescales between and Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity Friedemann Zenke1 and Wulfram Gerstner2 April 13, 2016 1) Dept. of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 2) Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne EPFL Abstract We review a body of theoretical and experimental research on the interactions of homeostatic and Hebbian plasticity, starting from a puzzling observation: While homeostasis of synapses found in experiments is slow, homeostasis of synapses in most mathematical models is rapid, or even instantaneous. Even worse, most existing plasticity models cannot maintain stability in simulated networks with the slow homeostatic plasticity reported in experiments. To solve this paradox, we suggest that there are both fast and slow forms of homeostatic plasticity with distinct functional roles. While fast homeostatic control mechanisms interacting with Hebbian plasticity render synaptic plasticity intrinsically stable, slower forms of homeostatic plasticity are important for fine-tuning neural circuits. Taken together we suggest that learning and memory relies on an intricate interplay of diverse plasticity mechanisms on different timescales which jointly ensure stability and plasticity of neural circuits. Introduction DRAFT Homeostasis refers to a group of physiological processes at different spatial and temporal scales that help to maintain the body, its organs, the brain, or even individual neurons in the brain in a target regime where they function optimally. A well-known example is the homeostatic regulation of body temperature in mammals, maintained at about 37 degrees Celsius independent of weather condition and air temperature. In neuroscience, homeostasis or homeostatic plasticity often refers to the homeostatic control of neural firing rates. In a classic experiment, cultured neurons that normally fire at, say 5Hz, change their firing rate after a modulation of the chemical conditions in the culture, but eventually return to their target rate of 5Hz during the following 24 hours (Turrigiano and Nelson, 2000). Thus, the experimentally best-studied form of synaptic homeostasis happens on a slow timescale of hours or days. This slow form of synaptic homeostasis manifests itself as a 1 rescaling of the strength of all synapses onto the same neuron by a fixed fraction, for instance 0.78, a phenomenon called “synaptic scaling” (Turrigiano et al., 1998). Mathematical models of neural networks also make use of homeostatic regulation to avoid run- away of the strength of synaptic weights or over-excitation of large parts of a neural network. In many mathematical models, homeostasis of synaptic weights is idealized by an explicit normalization of weights: if the weight (or efficacy) of one synaptic connection increases, weights of other connections onto the same neuron are algorithmically decreased so as to keep the total input in the target regime (Miller and MacKay, 1994). Algorithmic normalization of synaptic strength can be interpreted as an extremely fast homeostatic regulation mechanism. At a first glance, the result of multiplicative normalization (Miller and MacKay, 1994) is identical to “synaptic scaling” introduced above. Yet, it is fundamentally different from the experimentally studied form of synaptic homeostasis mentioned above, because of the vastly different timescales. While rescaling in the model is instantaneous, in biology the effects of synaptic scaling manifest themselves only after hours. Interestingly, researchers who have tested slow forms of homeostasis in mathematical models of plastic neural networks failed to stabilize the network activity. Thus, we are confronted with a dilemma: Theorists need fast synaptic homeostasis while ex- perimentalist have found homeostasis that is much slower. In this review we try to answer the following questions: Why do we need rapid forms of homeostatic synaptic plasticity? How fast does a rapid homeostatic mechanism have to be, hours, minutes, seconds or less? Furthermore, what are the functional consequences of fast homeostatic control? Can the combination of fast homeostasis with Hebbian learning lead to stable memory formation? And finally, if rapid homeostasis is a requirement, what is the role of slower forms of homeostatic plasticity? Conceptually, automatic control of a technical system is designed to keep the system in the regime where it works well, which is called the “working point” or the “set point” of the system. Analogously, homeostatic regulation of synapses is important to maintain the neural networks of the brain in a regime where they function well. However, in specific situations our brain needs to change. For example, when we exit the subway at an unknown station, when we are confronted with a new theoretical concept,DRAFT or when we learn how to play tennis, we need to memorize the novel environment, the new concept, or the unusual movement that we previously did not know or master. In these situations, the neural networks in the brain must be able to develop an additional desired “set point”, ideally without loosing the older ones. In neuroscience it is widely accepted that learning observed in humans or animals at the be- havioral level corresponds, at the level of neural networks, to changes in the synaptic connections between neurons (Morris et al., 1986; Martin et al., 2000). Thus, learning requires synapses to change. A strong form of synaptic homeostasis, however, keeps neurons and synapses always in the “old” regime, i.e. the one before learning occurred. In other words, strong homeostasis prevents learning. A weak or slow form of homeostasis, on the other hand, may not be sufficient to control the changes induced by memory formation. Before we can solve the riddle of stability during mem- 2 ory formation, and before we can answer the above questions, we need to classify known forms of synaptic plasticity. Classification of Synaptic Plasticity Synaptic plasticity, can be classified using different criteria. We consider three of these: Functional relevance, synaptic specificity, and timescale of effect duration. (i) Classification by potential function: Memory formation or homeostasis Functionally, synaptic plasticity can be classified as useful either for homeostatic regulation or for memory formation and action learning. Many experiments on synaptic plasticity were based on Hebb’s postulate which suggests that synaptic changes, caused by the joint activity of pre- and postsynaptic neurons, should be useful for the formation of memories (Hebb, 1949). Inspired by Hebb’s postulate, classical stimulation protocols for long-term potentiation (Bliss and Lomo, 1973; Malenka and Nicoll, 1999; Lisman, 2003), long-term depression (Lynch et al., 1977; Levy and Stew- ard, 1983), or spike-timing dependent plasticity (Markram et al., 1997; Bi and Poo, 1998; Sjöström et al., 2001), combine the activation of a presynaptic neuron, or a presynaptic pathway, with an activation, depolarization, or chemical manipulation of the postsynaptic neurons, to induce synaptic changes. In parallel, theoreticians have developed synaptic plasticity rules (Willshaw and Von Der Mals- burg, 1976; Bienenstock et al., 1982; Kempter et al., 1999; Song et al., 2000; Pfister and Gerstner, 2006; Clopath and Gerstner, 2010; Brito and Gerstner, 2016; Shouval et al., 2002; Graupner and Brunel, 2012), in part inspired by experimental data. Generically, in plasticity rules of computa- tional neuroscience the change of a synapse from a presynaptic neuron j to a neuron i is described as d w = F (w ; post ; pre ) (1) dt ij ij i j where wij is the momentary “weight” of a synaptic connection, posti describes the state of the postsynaptic neuron (e.g. its membraneDRAFT potential, calcium concentration, spike times, or firing rate) and prej is the activity of the presynaptic neuron (Brown et al., 1991; Morrison et al., 2008; Gerstner et al., 2014). A network of synaptic connections with weights consistent with Hebb’s postulate can form associative memory models (Willshaw et al., 1969; Little and Shaw, 1978; Hopfield, 1982; Amit et al., 1985; Amit and Brunel, 1997), also called attractor neural networks (Amit, 1989). However, in all the cited theoretical studies, learning is supposed to have happened somewhere in the past, while the retrieval of previously learned memories is studied under the assumption of fixed synaptic weights. The reason is that a simple implementation of Hebb’s postulate for memory formation is not sufficient to achieve stable learning (Rochester et al., 1956). Without clever homeostatic control of synaptic plasticity, neural networks with a Hebbian rule always move to an undesired state where all synapses go to their maximally allowed values and 3 all neurons fire beyond control — or to the other extreme where all activity dies out. Therefore, homeostasis in the sense of keeping the network in a desired regime, is a second and necessary function of synaptic plasticity. Candidate plasticity mechanisms for the homeostatic regulation of network function by synaptic plasticity include slow synaptic scaling (Turrigiano et al., 1998; Turrigiano and Nelson, 2000), rapid renormalization of weights (Miller and MacKay, 1994), or other mechanisms discussed below (Zenke et al., 2013, 2015; Chistiakova et al., 2015); but also synaptic plasticity of inhibitory interneurons
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rab3a As a Modulator of Homeostatic Synaptic Plasticity
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2014 Rab3A as a Modulator of Homeostatic Synaptic Plasticity Andrew G. Koesters Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering Commons Repository Citation Koesters, Andrew G., "Rab3A as a Modulator of Homeostatic Synaptic Plasticity" (2014). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 1246. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/1246 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RAB3A AS A MODULATOR OF HOMEOSTATIC SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By ANDREW G. KOESTERS B.A., Miami University, 2004 2014 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL August 22, 2014 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE DISSERTATION PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Andrew G. Koesters ENTITLED Rab3A as a Modulator of Homeostatic Synaptic Plasticity BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Doctor of Philosophy. Kathrin Engisch, Ph.D. Dissertation Director Mill W. Miller, Ph.D. Director, Biomedical Sciences Ph.D. Program Committee on Final Examination Robert E. W. Fyffe, Ph.D. Vice President for Research Dean of the Graduate School Mark Rich, M.D./Ph.D. David Ladle, Ph.D. F. Javier Alvarez-Leefmans, M.D./Ph.D. Lynn Hartzler, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Disruption of NMDA Receptor Function Prevents Normal Experience
    Research Articles: Development/Plasticity/Repair Disruption of NMDA receptor function prevents normal experience-dependent homeostatic synaptic plasticity in mouse primary visual cortex https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2117-18.2019 Cite as: J. Neurosci 2019; 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2117-18.2019 Received: 16 August 2018 Revised: 7 August 2019 Accepted: 8 August 2019 This Early Release article has been peer-reviewed and accepted, but has not been through the composition and copyediting processes. The final version may differ slightly in style or formatting and will contain links to any extended data. Alerts: Sign up at www.jneurosci.org/alerts to receive customized email alerts when the fully formatted version of this article is published. Copyright © 2019 the authors Rodriguez et al. 1 Disruption of NMDA receptor function prevents normal experience-dependent homeostatic 2 synaptic plasticity in mouse primary visual cortex 3 4 Gabriela Rodriguez1,4, Lukas Mesik2,3, Ming Gao2,5, Samuel Parkins1, Rinki Saha2,6, 5 and Hey-Kyoung Lee1,2,3 6 7 8 1. Cell Molecular Developmental Biology and Biophysics (CMDB) Graduate Program, 9 Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 10 2. Department of Neuroscience, Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 11 MD 21218 12 3. Kavli Neuroscience Discovery Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 13 21218 14 4. Current address: Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience, Jupiter, FL 33458 15 5. Current address: Division of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Pheonix, AZ 16 85013 17 6. Current address: Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY10032 18 19 Abbreviated title: NMDARs in homeostatic synaptic plasticity of V1 20 21 Corresponding Author: Hey-Kyoung Lee, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuronal Dynamics
    Week 7 – part 7: Helping Humans 7.1 What is a good neuron model? - Models and data 7.2 AdEx model Neuronal Dynamics: - Firing patterns and analysis Computational Neuroscience 7.3 Spike Response Model (SRM) of Single Neurons - Integral formulation 7.4 Generalized Linear Model (GLM) Week 7 – Optimizing Neuron Models - Adding noise to the SRM For Coding and Decoding 7.5 Parameter Estimation - Quadratic and convex optimization Wulfram Gerstner 7.6. Modeling in vitro data EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland - how long lasts the effect of a spike? 7.7. Helping Humans Week 7 – part 7: Helping Humans 7.1 What is a good neuron model? - Models and data 7.2 AdEx model - Firing patterns and analysis 7.3 Spike Response Model (SRM) - Integral formulation 7.4 Generalized Linear Model (GLM) - Adding noise to the SRM 7.5 Parameter Estimation - Quadratic and convex optimization 7.6. Modeling in vitro data - how long lasts the effect of a spike? 7.7. Helping Humans Neuronal Dynamics – Review: Models and Data -Predict spike times -Predict subthreshold voltage -Easy to interpret (not a ‘black box’) -Variety of phenomena -Systematic: ‘optimize’ parameters BUT so far limited to in vitro Neuronal Dynamics – 7.7 Systems neuroscience, in vivo Now: extracellular recordings visual cortex A) Predict spike times, given stimulus B) Predict subthreshold voltage C) Easy to interpret (not a ‘black box’) Model of ‘Encoding’ D) Flexible enough to account for a variety of phenomena E) Systematic procedure to ‘optimize’ parameters Neuronal Dynamics – 7.7 Estimation of receptive fields Estimation of spatial (and temporal) receptive fields ut() k I u LNP =+∑ kKk− rest firing intensity ρϑ()tfutt= ( ()− ()) Neuronal Dynamics – 7.7 Estimation of Receptive Fields visual LNP = stimulus Linear-Nonlinear-Poisson Special case of GLM= Generalized Linear Model GLM for prediction of retinal ganglion ON cell activity Pillow et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Hebbian Learning and Spiking Neurons
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E VOLUME 59, NUMBER 4 APRIL 1999 Hebbian learning and spiking neurons Richard Kempter* Physik Department, Technische Universita¨tMu¨nchen, D-85747 Garching bei Mu¨nchen, Germany Wulfram Gerstner† Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Center of Neuromimetic Systems, EPFL-DI, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland J. Leo van Hemmen‡ Physik Department, Technische Universita¨tMu¨nchen, D-85747 Garching bei Mu¨nchen, Germany ~Received 6 August 1998; revised manuscript received 23 November 1998! A correlation-based ~‘‘Hebbian’’! learning rule at a spike level with millisecond resolution is formulated, mathematically analyzed, and compared with learning in a firing-rate description. The relative timing of presynaptic and postsynaptic spikes influences synaptic weights via an asymmetric ‘‘learning window.’’ A differential equation for the learning dynamics is derived under the assumption that the time scales of learning and neuronal spike dynamics can be separated. The differential equation is solved for a Poissonian neuron model with stochastic spike arrival. It is shown that correlations between input and output spikes tend to stabilize structure formation. With an appropriate choice of parameters, learning leads to an intrinsic normal- ization of the average weight and the output firing rate. Noise generates diffusion-like spreading of synaptic weights. @S1063-651X~99!02804-4# PACS number~s!: 87.19.La, 87.19.La, 05.65.1b, 87.18.Sn I. INTRODUCTION In contrast to the standard rate models of Hebbian learn- ing, we introduce and analyze a learning rule where synaptic Correlation-based or ‘‘Hebbian’’ learning @1# is thought modifications are driven by the temporal correlations be- to be an important mechanism for the tuning of neuronal tween presynaptic and postsynaptic spikes.
    [Show full text]
  • Connectivity Reflects Coding: a Model of Voltage-‐Based Spike-‐ Timing-‐Dependent-‐P
    Connectivity reflects Coding: A Model of Voltage-based Spike- Timing-Dependent-Plasticity with Homeostasis Claudia Clopath, Lars Büsing*, Eleni Vasilaki, Wulfram Gerstner Laboratory of Computational Neuroscience Brain-Mind Institute and School of Computer and Communication Sciences Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne 1015 Lausanne EPFL, Switzerland * permanent address: Institut für Grundlagen der Informationsverarbeitung, TU Graz, Austria Abstract Electrophysiological connectivity patterns in cortex often show a few strong connections, sometimes bidirectional, in a sea of weak connections. In order to explain these connectivity patterns, we use a model of Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity where synaptic changes depend on presynaptic spike arrival and the postsynaptic membrane potential, filtered with two different time constants. The model describes several nonlinear effects in STDP experiments, as well as the voltage dependence of plasticity. We show that in a simulated recurrent network of spiking neurons our plasticity rule leads not only to development of localized receptive fields, but also to connectivity patterns that reflect the neural code: for temporal coding paradigms with spatio-temporal input correlations, strong connections are predominantly unidirectional, whereas they are bidirectional under rate coded input with spatial correlations only. Thus variable connectivity patterns in the brain could reflect different coding principles across brain areas; moreover simulations suggest that plasticity is surprisingly fast. Keywords: Synaptic plasticity, STDP, LTP, LTD, Voltage, Spike Introduction Experience-dependent changes in receptive fields1-2 or in learned behavior relate to changes in synaptic strength. Electrophysiological measurements of functional connectivity patterns in slices of neural tissue3-4 or anatomical connectivity measures5 can only present a snapshot of the momentary connectivity -- which may change over time6.
    [Show full text]
  • Homeostatic Synaptic Plasticity: Local and Global Mechanisms for Stabilizing Neuronal Function
    Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 25, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Homeostatic Synaptic Plasticity: Local and Global Mechanisms for Stabilizing Neuronal Function Gina Turrigiano Department of Biology and Center for Behavioral Genomics, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02493 Correspondence: [email protected] Neural circuits must maintain stable function in the face of many plastic challenges, includ- ing changes in synapse number and strength, during learning and development. Recent work has shown that these destabilizing influences are counterbalanced by homeostatic plasticity mechanisms that act to stabilize neuronal and circuit activity. One such mechanism is syn- aptic scaling, which allows neurons to detect changes in their own firing rates through a set of calcium-dependent sensors that then regulate receptor trafficking to increase or decrease the accumulation of glutamate receptors at synaptic sites. Additional homeostatic mechanisms may allow local changes in synaptic activation to generate local synaptic adaptations, and network-wide changes in activity to generate network-wide adjustments in the balance between excitation and inhibition. The signaling pathways underlying these various forms of homeostatic plasticity are currently under intense scrutiny, and although dozens of mol- ecular pathways have now been implicated in homeostatic plasticity, a clear picture of how homeostatic feedback is structured at the molecular level has not yet emerged. On a functional level, neuronal networks likely use this complex set of regulatory mechanisms to achieve homeostasis over a wide range of temporal and spatial scales. ore than 50 years ago, Walter Cannon eter that is subject to homeostatic regulation. Mmarveled that “somehow the unstable During development billions of neurons wire stuff of which we are composed has learned themselves up into complex networks and man- the trick of maintaining stability” (Cannon age to reach a state where they can generate— 1932).
    [Show full text]
  • Neural Coding and Integrate-And-Fire Model
    motor Introduction to computationalneuroscience. cortex Doctoral school Oct-Nov 2006 association visual cortex cortex to motor Wulfram Gerstner output http://diwww.epfl.ch/w3mantra/ Computational Neuroscience 10 000 neurons Signal: 3 km wires action potential (spike) 1mm behavior behavior action potential neurons signals computational model molecules ion channels Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne, EPFL Laboratory of Computational Neuroscience, LCN, CH 1015 Lausanne Hodgkin-Huxley type models Integrate-and-fire type models Spike emission j i u i J Spike reception -70mV action potential Na+ K+ -spikes are events Ca2+ -threshold Ions/proteins -spike/reset/refractoriness 1 Models of synaptic Plasticity Computational Neuroscience pre post i Synapse j behavior Neurons synapses computational model molecules ion channels Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, EPFL Laboratory of Computational Neuroscience, LCN, CH 1015 Lausanne Introduction to computationalneuroscience Background: What is brain-style computation? Lecture 1: Passive membrane and Integrate-and-Fire model Brain Computer Lecture 2: Hodgkin-Huxley models (detailed models) Lecture 3: Two-dimensional models (FitzHugh Nagumo) Lecture 4: synaptic plasticity Lecture 5: noise, network dynamics, associative memory Wulfram Gerstner http://diwww.epfl.ch/w3mantra/ Systems for computing and information processing Systems for computing and information processing Brain Computer Brain Computer memory Tasks: CPU slow Mathematical fast æ7p ö input 5cosç ÷ è 5 ø Distributed architecture
    [Show full text]
  • Eligibility Traces and Three-Factor Rules of Synaptic Plasticity
    Technische Universität München ENB Elite Master Program Neuroengineering (MSNE) Invited Presentation Prof. Dr. Wulfram Gerstner Ecole polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Eligibility traces and three-factor rules of synaptic plasticity Abstract: Hebbian plasticity combines two factors: presynaptic activity must occur together with some postsynaptic variable (spikes, voltage deflection, calcium elevation ...). In three-factor learning rules the combi- nation of the two Hebbian factors is not sufficient, but leaves a trace at the synapses (eligibility trace) which decays over a few seconds; only if a third factor (neuromodulator signal) is present, either simultaneously or within a short a delay, the actual change of the synapse via long-term plasticity is triggered. After a review of classic theories and recent evidence of plasticity traces from plasticity experiments in rodents, I will discuss two studies from my own lab: the first one is a modeling study of reward-based learning with spiking neurons using an actor-critic architecture; the second one is a joint theory-experimental study showing evidence for eligibility traces in human behavior and pupillometry. Extensions from reward-based learning to surprise-based learning will be indicated. Biography: Wulfram Gerstner is Director of the Laboratory of Computational Neuroscience LCN at the EPFL. He studied physics at the universities of Tubingen and Munich and received a PhD from the Technical University of Munich. His re- search in computational neuroscience concentrates on models of spiking neurons and spike-timing dependent plasticity, on the problem of neuronal coding in single neurons and populations, as well as on the role of spatial representation for naviga- tion of rat-like autonomous agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Burst-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity Can Coordinate Learning in Hierarchical Circuits
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.30.015511; this version posted September 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 2 Burst-dependent synaptic plasticity can coordinate learning in 3 hierarchical circuits 4 1 2,3 4 5,6,7,8 5 Alexandre Payeur • Jordan Guerguiev • Friedemann Zenke Blake A. Richards ⇤• and Richard 1,9, 6 Naud ⇤• 7 1 uOttawa Brain and Mind Institute, Centre for Neural Dynamics, Department of 8 Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada 9 2 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON, 10 Canada 11 3 Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada 12 4 Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland 13 5 Mila, Montr´eal, QC, Canada 14 6 Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montr´eal, QC, Canada 15 7 School of Computer Science, McGill University, Montr´eal, QC, Canada 16 8 Learning in Machines and Brains Program, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, 17 Toronto, ON, Canada 18 9 Department of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada 19 Corresponding authors, email: [email protected], [email protected] ⇤ 20 Equal contributions • 21 Abstract 22 Synaptic plasticity is believed to be a key physiological mechanism for learning. It is well-established that 23 it depends on pre and postsynaptic activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Receptor 1 and 2 Mediate Homeostatic Synaptic Plasticity of Denervated Mouse Dentate Granule Cells
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)- receptor 1 and 2 mediate homeostatic synaptic plasticity of Received: 04 March 2015 Accepted: 06 July 2015 denervated mouse dentate granule Published: 06 August 2015 cells Denise Becker†, Thomas Deller & Andreas Vlachos Neurological diseases are often accompanied by neuronal cell death and subsequent deafferentation of connected brain regions. To study functional changes after denervation we generated entorhino- hippocampal slice cultures, transected the entorhinal pathway, and denervated dentate granule cells in vitro. Our previous work revealed that partially denervated neurons respond to the loss of input with a compensatory, i.e., homeostatic, increase in their excitatory synaptic strength. TNFα maintains this denervation-induced homeostatic strengthening of excitatory synapses. Here, we used pharmacological approaches and mouse genetics to assess the role of TNF-receptor 1 and 2 in lesion-induced excitatory synaptic strengthening. Our experiments disclose that both TNF-receptors are involved in the regulation of denervation-induced synaptic plasticity. In line with this result TNF-receptor 1 and 2 mRNA-levels were upregulated after deafferentation in vitro. These findings implicate TNF-receptor signaling cascades in the regulation of homeostatic plasticity of denervated networks and suggest an important role for TNFα-signaling in the course of neurological diseases accompanied by deafferentation. Homeostatic control of cortical excitability, connectivity and plasticity is considered essential for normal brain function1–3. Work from the past years has unraveled a wealth of information on compensatory mechanisms acting in the brain to keep the activity in neuronal networks within a physiological range4. Among the best studied mechanisms is homeostatic synaptic plasticity5–8, which adjusts synaptic strength to changes in network activity in a compensatory manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Robust Rhythmogenesis Via Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.23.217026; this version posted March 31, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Robust Rhythmogenesis via Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity Gabi Socolovsky1, 2, ∗ and Maoz Shamir1, 2, 3 1Department of Physics, Faculty of Natural Sciences, 2Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, 3Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er-Sheva, Israel (Dated: March 31, 2021) Rhythmic activity has been observed in numerous animal species ranging from insects to humans, and in relation to a wide range of cognitive tasks. Various experimental and theoretical studies have investigated rhythmic activity. The theoretical efforts have mainly been focused on the neuronal dynamics, under the assumption that network connectivity satisfies certain fine-tuning conditions required to generate oscillations. However, it remains unclear how this fine tuning is achieved. Here we investigated the hypothesis that spike timing dependent plasticity (STDP) can provide the underlying mechanism for tuning synaptic connectivity to generate rhythmic activity. We addressed this question in a modeling study. We examined STDP dynamics in the framework of a network of excitatory and inhibitory neuronal populations that has been suggested to underlie the generation of oscillations in the gamma range. Mean field Fokker Planck equations for the synaptic weights dynamics are derived in the limit of slow learning. We drew on this approximation to determine which types of STDP rules drive the system to exhibit rhythmic activity, and demonstrate how the parameters that characterize the plasticity rule govern the rhythmic activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Biologically Plausible Gradient Descent by Jordan
    Towards biologically plausible gradient descent by Jordan Guerguiev A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Cell and Systems Biology University of Toronto c Copyright 2021 by Jordan Guerguiev Abstract Towards biologically plausible gradient descent Jordan Guerguiev Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Cell and Systems Biology University of Toronto 2021 Synaptic plasticity is the primary physiological mechanism underlying learning in the brain. It is de- pendent on pre- and post-synaptic neuronal activities, and can be mediated by neuromodulatory signals. However, to date, computational models of learning that are based on pre- and post-synaptic activity and/or global neuromodulatory reward signals for plasticity have not been able to learn complex tasks that animals are capable of. In the machine learning field, neural network models with many layers of computations trained using gradient descent have been highly successful in learning difficult tasks with near-human level performance. To date, it remains unclear how gradient descent could be implemented in neural circuits with many layers of synaptic connections. The overarching goal of this thesis is to develop theories for how the unique properties of neurons can be leveraged to enable gradient descent in deep circuits and allow them to learn complex tasks. The work in this thesis is divided into three projects. The first project demonstrates that networks of cortical pyramidal neurons, which have segregated apical dendrites and exhibit bursting behavior driven by dendritic plateau potentials, can in theory leverage these physiological properties to approximate gradient descent through multiple layers of synaptic connections.
    [Show full text]