Surgeon Captain Sheldon F Dudley and the Person to Person Spread of Brucellosis by Inhalation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Surgeon Captain Sheldon F Dudley and the Person to Person Spread of Brucellosis by Inhalation J Royal Naval Medical Service 2010, 96.3 185-187 History Surgeon Captain Sheldon F Dudley and the person to person spread of brucellosis by inhalation H V Wyatt Abstract at the culture tubes.’(3). When I worked in a Analysis of brucellosis epidemics in ships of hospital laboratory in 1954, staff opened the the Mediterranean fleet in the nineteenth petri- dishes to sniff cultures grown on the century are most easily explained by aerosol agar, as some bacteria can be recognised by transmission in grossly overcrowded, hot and their distinctive odours. The dangers of this humid confined spaces. practice are now recognised. In 1931 Captain Dudley RN proposed that brucellosis could be Introduction transmitted by droplet infection. Brucellosis may well be the disease most easily acquired in the laboratory. Almost all workers Brucellosis in the Mediterranean Fleet with the bacteria have been infected and almost Surgeon Captain Sheldon F. Dudley RN, all veterinarians who have had contact with Professor of Pathology at the RN Medical susceptible animals have high titres of College at Greenwich, gave the 1931 Milroy antibodies against the bacteria. The members of lectures which were printed in the Lancet . The the Mediterranean Fever Commission (MFC) in third lecture was on brucellosis (Undulant fever) Malta all had episodes of ill-health, but whether in the 19th century, but this paper has probably this was from the bacterial cultures or from been overlooked and forgotten. He traced the goats’ milk is not clear. Captain Hughes was in outbreaks of brucellosis in ships of the Malta from 1890 until he was invalided to Britain Mediterranean fleet in the later half of the 19th with brucellosis in 1896. In the preface to his century when they had been at sea for many classic book on the disease, he recorded that his weeks. In 1882 two ship epidemics accounted wife and two sisters had also contracted the for 42 % of the fleet cases. One of these ships disease(1). He recommended goats’ milk for was HMS Superb which had 136 cases, 77 of army hospital patients with brucellosis. Captain whom were invalided home and one died, Dudley RN commented that in the navy in the ‘typical undulant fever figures’. The Medical 19th C ‘fresh milk was essentially a wardroom Officer gave the spatial distribution of the cases: luxury; the men did not get milk on board, and ‘The ratings in the Superb slept on three probably rarely drank goats’ milk ashore..… decks. The flying deck was a kind of huge shelf officers were more frequently infected with brucella than men.’(2). This was probably the Deck Ventilation No. ratings % fever case for army officers too. Flying worst, lowest cubic 140 29 In the 1950s Francois Jacob joined the space per man other members of the Institute on the annual Lower 196 17 pilgrimage to Pasteur’s crypt. Among the Battery better and relatively 250 10 ‘Pastorians … was the one to whom all France spacious sent microbes that were hard to characterize, and who made his diagnosis by smell, sniffing Table: Fever on HMS Superb . 185 Surgeon Captain Sheldon F Dudley and the spread of brucellosis by inhalation 186 cutting part of the lower deck horizontally in two.’ from the space above. All the ports as well as the small round scuttles were kept closed Strange Epidemics at night.’ Further details followed . His graph of illnesses in the Mediterranean Dudley concluded ‘that it would seem that Fleet showed that peaks of fevers frequently in this environment Br melitensis had acquired coincided with those of rheumatism. For the power of spreading by droplet infection… individual ships, there were also ‘strange … this unusual form of pneumonic undulant epidemics’ where there were coincident peaks fever became temporarily able to spread by of rheumatism and pulmonary disease. He droplet infection in the relatively spacious noted that ‘The naval commentator of the 1856 wards of the Malta Naval hospital [at Bighi]’. report writes that “the prevalence of fever in the [HMS] Hannibal for a period of two years Aerosol From a Monkey can only be ascribed to the successive Aerosol infection had been suggested by an transmission of the disease by infection from incident in Malta during the researches into one set of men to another” . Dudley noted transmission of the disease by the MFC. that cases before 1897 (when diagnosis of Captain Kennedy RAMC noted that ‘One of the Mediterranean Fever was first used) were monkeys had become very knowing and learnt often described as ‘phthisis or inflammation of to shut his nostrils when the dust was being the lungs’. Phthisis was used to describe the blown in by means of a rubber bag. One day progressive wasting disease, especially of the attendant [RAMC] instead of using the pulmonary tuberculosis: since the use of rubber squirt put his mouth to the tube antibiotics it is no longer used. intending to blow it in himself. Unfortunately HMS St. Jean D’Acre and Cressy both for him, the monkey blew first ! A fortnight to suffered ‘the same peculiar disease’. In the 3 weeks later he was sent to hospital with an former ship, 416 out of 880 men suffered attack of fever. Whether the infection was from the pulmonary illness while the latter had really contracted by him in this way cannot be 285 cases with 102 ‘were definitely diagnosed absolutely decided, but he himself blames the “phthisis” and 117 “cachexia pulmonis”; 112 dust’(4). of these were invalided home but only six died’. ‘The cases from both ships quickly Later Career recovered on their return to England – a Sheldon Dudley (1884 – 1956) became characteristic of the pulmonary complications Surgeon Vice Admiral, Medical Director-General of Malta fever seen in more recent times’. of the Royal Naval 1941 - 1945. He was made HMS London recorded 54 pulmonary KCB and OBE and was elected Fellow of the cases, 12 of which were “phthisis” : this Royal Society in 1941(5). He was given many epidemic was attributed to bad ventilation honours both here and abroad and won many between decks. Dudley then reprinted the prizes for his researches. ‘Dudley’s work at description of the lower deck in her sister ship Greenwich can with justice be claimed to have the St Jean D’Acre : made possible the success of the national ‘All the ship’s company amounting to campaign for diphtheria immunization’. In his about 930 men…slept on this deck. The retirement he wrote two books, The four hammock hooks were placed ordinarily at pillars of wisdom and Our national ill-health only 14 inches apart – less than the average service . breadth of the mens’ shoulders; consequently while in harbour when no Discussion watch was required at night and all hands had Dudley wrote three special reports for the turned in, they formed a compact mass close Medical Research Council including The beneath the beams, the only air available for spread of droplet infection in semi-isolated respiration being above them, that beneath communities in 1926. His analysis of the the hammocks being almost entirely shut out droplet infection of brucellosis was therefore 187 J Royal Naval Medical Service 2010, Vol 96.3 part of a general study. From the naval health Droplet infection between humans seems very reports of the 19th century he concluded that unlikely in ordinary circumstances, but prior to 1856 there had been little or perhaps conditions in detention camps and prisons in no brucellosis in the Mediterranean Fleet. The many countries make it a real risk even in first recognition of the disease was in the these times. ships carrying invalided soldiers from the Crimea to Malta. He explained that the ship References epidemics were caused by droplet infection, 1. Hughes ML. Mediterranean, Malta or Undulant quoting broncho-pneumonia and signs in the Fever. MacMillan 1897, p 232. lungs as a common complication of ordinary 2. Dudley SF. Some lessons of the distribution of brucellosis, which simulates phthisis with infectious disease in the Royal Navy. Lecture III. remarkable accuracy. He quoted that ‘ Br. The history of undulant fever in the Royal Navy. melitensis had been recovered from the Lancet 1931; 1: 683-691. sputum of patients resembling clinical phthisis 3. Jacob F. The statue within . An autobiography. which was seen in an epidemic of undulant Unwin Hyman Ltd, London. 1988 (see p 245-246). fever at Naples’. 4. Wyatt HV. Dr. James Crawford Kennedy RAMC Dudley was a notable Professor of and the sexual transmission of brucellosis. Pathology and a perceptive naval surgeon: his JRAMC in press. analysis of those far off epidemics was far 5. Obituaries of Sheldon Dudley, BMJ 1956; 1; 1113 sighted, but unheeded. These and other and 1177. arguments make his explanation of droplet 6. Olle-Goig JE, Canela-Soler J. An outbreak of infection accurate and convincing. Recent Brucella Melitensis infection by airborne epidemics confirm that inhalation brucellosis transmission among laboratory workers. Am J happens. For instance, airborne transmission Pub Health 1987; 77: 335-338. of bacteria caused an outbreak of brucellosis among laboratory workers in Spain in 19826(6). H V Wyatt, PhD FSB Visiting Lecturer in Philosophy, School of Philosophy,, (formerly Honorary Research Fellow in Public Health Medicine), University of Leeds. Leeds LS2 9JT Address for correspondance: 1 Hollyshaw Terrace, Leeds, LS15 7BG, Tel: 0113 264 6679.
Recommended publications
  • 'The Admiralty War Staff and Its Influence on the Conduct of The
    ‘The Admiralty War Staff and its influence on the conduct of the naval between 1914 and 1918.’ Nicholas Duncan Black University College University of London. Ph.D. Thesis. 2005. UMI Number: U592637 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U592637 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 CONTENTS Page Abstract 4 Acknowledgements 5 Abbreviations 6 Introduction 9 Chapter 1. 23 The Admiralty War Staff, 1912-1918. An analysis of the personnel. Chapter 2. 55 The establishment of the War Staff, and its work before the outbreak of war in August 1914. Chapter 3. 78 The Churchill-Battenberg Regime, August-October 1914. Chapter 4. 103 The Churchill-Fisher Regime, October 1914 - May 1915. Chapter 5. 130 The Balfour-Jackson Regime, May 1915 - November 1916. Figure 5.1: Range of battle outcomes based on differing uses of the 5BS and 3BCS 156 Chapter 6: 167 The Jellicoe Era, November 1916 - December 1917. Chapter 7. 206 The Geddes-Wemyss Regime, December 1917 - November 1918 Conclusion 226 Appendices 236 Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BATTLE of COPENHAGEN SHIPS of the LINE (Guns)
    THE BATTLE OF COPENHAGEN 2nd. April 1801 THE BRITISH FLEET SHIPS of the LINE (Guns) Elephant (74)* Captain Thomas Foley Captain Thomas Hardy (as volunteer) Defiance (74) Captain Richard Retallick Edgar (74) Captain George Murray Monarch (74) Captain James Mosse Bellona (74) Captain Thomas Thompson Ganges(74) Captain Thomas Fremantle Russell (74) Captain William Cuming Agamemnon (64) Captain Robert Fancourt Ardent (64) Captain Thomas Bertie Polyphemus (64) Captain John Lawford Glatton (50) Captain William Bligh Isis (50) Captain James Walker FRIGATES Amazon (38) Captain Henry Riou Desiree (36) Captain Henry Inman Blanche (36) Captain Graham Hammond Alcmene (32) Captain Samuel Sutton Jamaica (24) Captain Jonas Rose SLOOPS Arrow (12) Commander William Rose Dart (12) Commander John Devonshire BRIGS Cruiser (18) Commander James Brisbane Harpy (18) Commander William Birchall BOMB SHIPS Discovery Commander John Conn Explosion Commander John Martin Hecla Commander Richard Hatherill Sulphur Commander Hender Witter Terror Commander Samuel Rowley Volcano Commander James Watson Zebra Commander Edward Clay FIRE SHIPS Zephyr Commander Clotworthy Upton Otter Commander George McKinley THE COMMANDERS Admiral Sir Hyde Parker Commander­in­Chief, Baltic Fleet. HMS London (not engaged) Vice Admiral Lord Nelson KB Second in Command, Baltic Fleet Commanded the Fleet Action at Copenhagen HMS Elephant Rear Admiral Thomas Graves Third in Command, Baltic Fleet Second in Command at the Fleet Action HMS Defiance Notes: Captains Foley, Hardy, and Thompson had served under Nelson at The Battle of The Nile, 1st. August 1798. Captain William Bligh had resumed service following his acquittal by Court Martial over the Bounty mutiny. Contemporary Reports of the Battle of Copenhagen Foreword by Michael Bruff The following extracts from the Naval Chronicle for 1801 relate to the lead­up to the battle, the engagement itself, and its aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • Captain Burges Watson, C.V.O., R.N. Oct
    No. Service: Rank: Names & Service Information: Supporting Information: 24. 4th 27th Captain Burges Watson, C.V.O., R.N. Oct. Nov. B. 24 Sept 1846, St Nicholas, 1st Son of Rundle Burges Watson R.N. (B. 1809- 1896 1899 Warwick, Warwickshire, England. Alphington, Devon D. 5 July 1860). Who was, in D. 21 Sept 1902 died on Malta of turn eldest son of Captain Joshua Rowley pneumonia (aged 55). Watson (1772-1810) Rundle Burges Watson Mason R.N., died 5 Jul 1806 (while serving as 27 1 Oct 1859 Entered Naval Service aged Nov 1899 Superintendent of Sheerness Dockyard). 1895 13 years. Burges’s mother was Helen (1820-Bathampton April 1861 Census shows Burges Somerset, England.). Watson as a Naval Cadet, aged 14, Issue: 3 children, 1 boy, 2 girls. Ryde, Isle of White. 5 Jul 1866 Naval Cadet Burges 20 Sept 1882 - Married to Marie Thérèse Watson was promoted to Watson (nee Fischer) B. 1856 New Zealand, D. Mate/Sub Lieutenant. Nov 27, 1918 (62 yrs.) London, Middlesex, 5 Sep 1866 Sub Lieutenant Burges England. Watson Promoted to the rank of Lieutenant. Marriage Notice: The Sydney Morning Herald Jun 1867-Jan 1869 Lieutenant (New South Wales: 1842 - 1954) Thu 5 Oct 1882 Burges Watson posted to H.M.S. Page 13 Family Notices: WATSON—FISCHER— “Arethusa”, a wooden 4th Rate, Sept. 20, by Rev. T. Kemmis, Burges Watson, to launched as a sailing vessel of the Marie Thérèse Fischer. Constance class from Pembroke Registration Number Groom's Surname Groom's Royal Dockyard 20 Jun 1849. Her Given Name(s) Bride's Last Name at Time of builder’s measure was 2132 tons Marriage Bride's Given Name(s) District with a displacement of 3832 tons, 2700/1882 WATSON BURGES FISCHER MARIE I armed with 50 guns.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dispatch of Rear-Admiral Thomas Graves to America in 1780 David
    A Strategy of Detachments: The Dispatch of Rear-Admiral Thomas Graves to America in 1780 David Syrett Le professeur Syrett offre une critique de ce qu'il nomme la « stratégie des détachements » du conseil de l'Amirauté pendant la guerre d'indépendance américaine. Cet article établit la chronologie de l'envoi de l'amiral Sir Thomas Graves vers l'Amérique, en 1780, de la décision d'envoyer un escadron jusqu 'à l'arrivée de celui-ci à New York. Les délais de son départ forment un bon exemple de « friction en temps de guerre ». Syrett met l'accent sur le fait que les décisions prises à Londres l'étaient toujours en réaction au renseignement plutôt que d'être des initiatives. In the American War, unlike in the other maritime conflicts of the eighteenth century, the British followed mostly a strategy of detachments.' In the Seven Years' and French Revolutionary Wars, a strategy of blockade was employed and attempts were made to bottle up enemy naval forces in European seas. By contrast in the American War squadrons of warships were dispatched across the Atlantic in pursuit of enemy forces proceeding to the Western Hemisphere. Beginning in 1778, when Byron with a squadron of warships chased the French admiral Comte d'Estaing, first to America and then on to the West Indies, down to the Saints campaign of 1782,2 British naval strategy, for the most part, consisted of reacting to French and Spanish initiatives by sending British warships across the Atlantic to counter the movements of enemy squadrons of warships. While the application of such a strategy could prove challenging, its effectiveness could be even more tenuous.
    [Show full text]
  • Captain Charles John Balfour, R.N. Mar 1896 B
    No. Service: Rank: Names & Service Information: Supporting Information: 23. 21st Oct. Captain Charles John Balfour, R.N. Mar 1896 B. 3 Oct 1841, Ventnor, Isle of Believed son of Charles Anthony Balfour and 1895 White, Hampshire, England – D. Charlotte Balfour, baptised on the 5 Nov 1841 in 19 Jan 1902, Ealing, Middlesex. Milbrook, Hampshire, England. (aged 61 years). Buried: South Ealing Cemetery, Middlesex, Mason 23 27 Nov London, England. Mar 1896 1895 12 Oct 1854-1 Mar 1856 Charles 1869 Oct-Dec: Marriage of Charles John Balfour John Balfour joined her Majesty's to Constance Marian Brooke (B. Oct 1844, service as a naval cadet, aged 13 Ilfracombe, Devon, England. D. 10 Nov 1910, years, on board H.M.S. “Calcutta” Chichester, Chester, England. Buried. 15 Nov 84 guns, a Teak timber 2nd rate 1910, Ealing & Old Brentford Cemetery [with vessel, launched: Bombay 14 Mar husband Charles John Balfour]). Marriage held 1831. She actively served in the in Exeter, Devon. China war 1856. She carried a complement of 435 officers and Issue: men; 60 boys; 150 marines, when 1. Margaret Edith Balfour (B. 1870, Southsea, operational. She had been paid Hampshire, England) off in 1842 at Plymouth and then 2. Constance M.E. Balfour (B. 1871, Southsea, recommissioned at Devonport Hampshire, England) and utilised as a training and 3. Frances M.L.S. Balfour (B. 1876, Middlesex, gunnery ship. She was of 2299 London, England) tons and finally disposed of in 1908. 2 Mar 1856-25 Aug 1856 Naval Cadet Charles John Balfour re- attached to H.M.S. “London” 90 gun, as a Naval Cadet.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Accidents 1945-1988, Neptune Papers No. 3
    -- Neptune Papers -- Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945 - 1988 by William M. Arkin and Joshua Handler Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. June 1989 Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945-1988 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nuclear Weapons Accidents......................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Reactor Accidents ........................................................................................................... 7 Submarine Accidents .................................................................................................................... 9 Dangers of Routine Naval Operations....................................................................................... 12 Chronology of Naval Accidents: 1945 - 1988........................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Sources and Acknowledgements........................................................................ 73 Appendix B: U.S. Ship Type Abbreviations ............................................................................ 76 Table 1: Number of Ships by Type Involved in Accidents, 1945 - 1988................................ 78 Table 2: Naval Accidents by Type
    [Show full text]
  • Midshipmen and Quarterdeck Boys in the Royal Navy, 1793-1815 Samantha A
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2006 Playing at command: midshipmen and quarterdeck boys in the Royal Navy, 1793-1815 Samantha A. Cavell Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Cavell, Samantha A., "Playing at command: midshipmen and quarterdeck boys in the Royal Navy, 1793-1815" (2006). LSU Master's Theses. 2356. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2356 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PLAYING AT COMMAND: MIDSHIPMEN AND QUARTERDECK BOYS IN THE ROYAL NAVY, 1793-1815 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of History by Samantha A. Cavell Bachelor of Business, Queensland University of Technology, 1990 Brisbane, Australia May 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables . iv Abstract . v Introduction . 1 Two Critical Events for the Georgian Navy . 4 Testing Social Theories Using the Royal Navy Model . 8 Identifying the Quarterdeck Boy . 16 The Midshipman’s Lot. 21 Part I – Selecting Young Gentlemen for Sea Service Noble Rot . 27 Changing Selection . 28 Sobriety, Diligence, and Qualifications - The Ideal Young Gentleman . 34 Connections, Interest, and Patronage .
    [Show full text]
  • HMS London Paying Off Newsletter
    Captain J Garnier MVO FIL (RN) HMS London entering Portsmouth FOREWORD BY CAPTAIN J GARNIER MVO FIL (RN) It will be a sad day for all of us when HMS LONDON pays off in Portsmouth on return from the Caribbean. This fine ship has enjoyed a distinguished career since 1963, and our sadness will be shared by all those who served in previous commissions. We should not, however, allow our regret to dim our memories of the excellent spirit that has always prevailed onboard throughout the life of the ship, and particularly over the last two years. We have been faced with many challenges and I hope that all of you will share my great pride at our achievements. Both operationally and professionally we have reached a very high standard, and the obvious success of our goodwill visits will have contributed significantly to the diplomatic efforts of our national representatives. This has entailed a lot of hard work by everybody, and I have been continually impressed by the outstanding good humour and enthusiasm with which each new task was undertaken. Nor should we forget our families, without whose warm and unflagging support HMS LONDON would not have been such a happy and efficient ship. I am most grateful to the Editors of this booklet for their hard work in providing such an excellent souvenir of a most memorable last commission, and I wish you and your families the best of good fortune in the future. - - INTRODUCTION The aim of this Newsletter is to mark the end of the present HMS LONDON's life.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms International 300 N
    INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. Wliile the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo­ graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy.
    [Show full text]
  • MB1/T Mountbatten Papers: Personal and Naval Papers of Prince Louis of Battenberg, First Marquis of Milford Haven
    1 MB1/T Mountbatten Papers: Personal and naval papers of Prince Louis of Battenberg, first Marquis of Milford Haven MB1/T1-10 Personal and naval papers of Prince Louis of Battenberg, first Marquis of Milford Haven, (numbers 1-62), 1886-1911 MB1/T1 Naval papers (1-12), 1886-94: (1) Folder entitled "Milford Haven August 1886" containing printed memoranda on "Combined naval and military operations, Milford Haven, 1886" and manuscript notes by Commander Prince Louis of Battenberg on the operations, during which he was acting as an umpire, 1886 (2) Manuscript letter from the Admiralty to Vice Admiral Sir Anthony Hoskins, CINC, Mediterranean, expressing their approbation of Commander Prince Louis of Battenberg's report on Fort Izzedin, Sude Point, Crete, 9 July 1890 (3) Manuscript letter from the Admiralty to Vice Admiral Hoskins, expressing their approbation of Commander Prince Louis of Battenberg's report on the Italian possessions at Massowah, 16 February 1891 (4) Manuscript memorandum by Vice Admiral Sir George Tryon, CINC, Mediterranean, expressing his appreciation of Commander Prince Louis of Battenberg's work during his cruise on the Algerian and Tuscan coast, 12 October 1891 (5) Manuscript letter from the Admiralty to Vice Admiral Tryon, expressing their appreciation of Commander Prince Louis of Battenberg's report on the coasts of Algeria and Tunis, 27 October 1891 (6) Manuscript letter from the Admiralty to Vice Admiral Tryon, expressing their satisfaction at the favourable report of inspection of HMS SCOUT, 28 January 1892 (7) Typescript
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Navy Exhibit
    Royal Navy Concession Rate Letters ROYAL NAVY CONCESSION RATE LETTERS 1795 – 1903 Large Gold & Grand Award Collection 1 Royal Navy Concession Rate Letters INTRODUCING GERALD JAMES ELLOTT 2 Royal Navy Concession Rate Letters Gerald James Ellott, MNZM, RDP, FRPSNZ Gerald is one of New Zealand's leading philatelist and postal historian. By profession he is a Chartered Architect having designed schools in England and working for the NZ Ministry of Works and the Education Department since 1955, and has had his own practice in Auckland for over 50 years, specializing in Education Buildings. Gerald started collecting postage stamps at the tender age of seven and has been passionate about the hobby ever since. Involved with organized philately since coming to New Zealand, he served on the Council of the NZ Philatelic Federation for 32 years, and is still active in their Judging Seminars. He has been awarded the NZ Federation Award of Merit and Award of Honour as well as the coveted Award of Philatelic Excellence. In 1980 Gerald was Chairman of the very successful International Stamp Exhibition, “Zeapex '80” held in Auckland and to date the Zeapex Philatelic Trust has distributed over $500,000.00 to the philatelic fraternity in NZ. Currently a life member of the Royal Philatelic Society of NZ and a past President, he has received all their honours including the Centennial Medal, the Rhodes and Collins Awards. Having started his foray into competitive exhibitions, a Silver Bronze medal for 32 sheets of Chalons, at Sipex (Washington) in 1966, a medal which he treasures as one of the most important, he has formed at least four major collections, two of which have both been in the FIP Championship Class, one of which was awarded the Grand Prix National of the NZ 1990 FIP International Exhibition held in Auckland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gulf War Than Had Been Deployed Since World War II, the Gulf War Involved Few Tests of the Unique Capabilities of Seapower
    GW-10 Naval and Amphibious Forces October 15, 1994 Page 860 Chapter Ten: Naval And Amphibious Forces While Seapower played a dominant role in enforcing the UN sanctions and embargo during Desert Shield, it played a largely supportive role in Desert Shield. In spite of the fact that the Coalition deployed more seapower during the Gulf War than had been deployed since World War II, the Gulf War involved few tests of the unique capabilities of seapower. In many areas, lessons are more the exception than the rule. Naval airpower played an important role in supporting the Coalition air campaign, but the unique capabilities of sea- based and amphibious air power were only exploited in missions against a weak Iraqi Navy. Sea control and the campaign against Iraqi naval forces presented only a limited challenge because the Iraqi Navy was so small, and the Coalition's amphibious capabilities were not used in combat. While the Gulf War demonstrated the importance of low cost systems like naval mines and countermine capabilities, the countermine campaign is difficult to analyze because Iraq was allowed to mine coastal waters without opposition during Desert Shield. Naval gunfire supported several Coalition land actions, but its value was never fully exploited because the Coalition had such a high degree of air supremacy, and Iraq was forced to retreat for other reasons. This makes it difficult to draw broad lessons about the role of sea power in contingencies involving major surface actions, sea-air-missile encounters, and actual amphibious landings. at the same time, naval forces did illustrate As a result, the Gulf War's lessons apply more to the details of actual operations than broad doctrinal and operational issues.
    [Show full text]