Environmental Monitoring Report
# Annual Safeguard Monitoring Report March 2019
UZB: Horticulture Value Chain Development Project
Prepared by Sayfullo Gaibullaev and Diana Rakhimova (UZIAFSA) for the Agency for implementation of projects in the field of agroindustry and food security (UZAIFSA) and the Asian Development Bank.
ANNUAL SAFEGUARD MONITORING REPORT
Project Number: 3471-UZB (SF) Reporting period: January – December 2018
Republic of Uzbekistan: Horticulture Value Chain Development Project (FТnanced by tСe ADB’s ordТnary capТtal resources)
Prepared by: Sayfullo Gaibullaev, Rakhimova Diana, (UZAIFSA) Tashkent, Uzbekistan
For: ADB
Agency for implementation of projects in the field of agroindustry and food security (UZAIFSA)
Endorsed by: Bakhtiyor Kamalov (Deputy Director General of UZAIFSA)
This environmental monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. ABBREVIATIONS
ADB – Asian Development Bank CAR – Capital adequacy ratio CBU – Central Bank of Uzbekistan ESMS – Environmental and social management system MAWR – Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources MOF – Ministry of Finance PFI – Participating financial institution PIU – Project implementation unit PMO – Project management office RRA – Rural Restructuring Agency SEE – State Environmental Expertise EIS – Environmental Impact Statement NBU _ National Bank of Uzbekistan SLA _ Subsidiary Loan Agreement UZAIFSA _ Agency for implementation of projects in the field of agroindustry and food security Table of Contents Part I Introduction ...... 4 1.1. Short description of the program...... 4 1.2. Summary of activities and project progress during the previous 12 months ...... 4 Part II Environmental issues ...... 9 2.1. Environmental issues in the previous 12 months...... 9 2.2. Explanations of instances in which environmental standards or guidelines were exceeded or environmental incidents happened ...... 10 2.3. Recommendations are required to show how any exceedances will be prevented in the future ...... 11 Part III: Compliance with ADB’s Social Protection Requirements and ADB’s Prohibited Investment Activities List ...... 12 3.1. A brief description of the taken measures ...... 13 Part IV: ESMS operations (for PFIs which are financing B-category subprojects) ...... 13 4.1. A brief description of the effectiveness of the ESMS within 12 months...... 13 4.2. Specific data on the following activities is recommended ...... 14 5.1. Conclusions...... 15 5.2. Action plan for the next reporting period ...... 15 Annexes ...... 17 Annex 2: Site photographs ...... 24 Annex 3: Terms of reference (ToR) Annex 4: ESMS reports
Part I Introduction
1.1. Short description of the program The project supports the government strategy in horticulture value chain development through increasing outreach of participating financial institutions (PFI) to horticulture farmers and entrepreneurs in all in twelve regions nationwide and the Republic of Karakalpakistan. It improved access to market-based bank finance for farmers, agro-processing enterprises, owners and operators of cold storage facilities, trading and logistics service suppliers involved in the horticulture value chain. The project helped increase farm productivity, processing and storage capacity, and reduced post-harvest losses through upgrading and setting up intensive orchards, modern and efficient greenhouses, processing, storage and refrigeration facilities. In this turn, it promoted long- term economic and environmental sustainability, and enhanced profitability for farmers and agribusiness enterprises.
1.2. Summary of activities and project progress during the previous 12 months. According to the Loan Agreement and project agreements, eight participating financial institutions (PFIs) as well as National Bank of Uzbekistan, Asaka Bank, Uzpromstroybank, Ipak Yuli Bank, Ipoteka Bank, Hamkorbank, Turon Bank and Davr Bank were selected to participate in the project. Out of the total loan proceed of USD 154 million, USD 151 million was allocated for the credit line and USD 3 million was earmarked for project management and implementation support. In fact, as of January 1, 2019 USD 152.2 million (or 98.8% of the loan amount) has been released from Loan 3471-UZB, including USD 151.4 million to PFIs for sub-loan financing, and USD 0.761 million to RRA for project management and implementation.
Allocations and withdrawals of credit line were done by PFIs as shown in the table below:
Table 1: Summary of activities and project progress during 12 months
Allocated Withdrawn % from (in PFIs (in million allocated № million USD) ammount USD) 1 NBU 50.6 50.6 100.0 2 Asaka bank 46.7 46.7 100.0 3 Uzpromstroybank 15.0 15.0 100.0 4 Ipoteka bank 11.0 11.0 100.0 5 Ipak Yuli bank 10.0 10.0 100.0 6 Turonbank 10.0 10.0 100.0 7 Hamkorbank 5.0 5.0 100.0 8 Davr bank 3.0 3.0 100.0 Total 151.4 151.4 100.0
162 subprojects were financed during the entire project period, while in the reporting period - there were 38 subprojects financed. All subprojects underwent preliminary environmental screening by the PFIs strictly following the Environmental and social management system (ESMS) procedures of which 157 are classified as "B" and the remaining 5 subprojects are classified as "C" according to the legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan in the field of environmental protection and ADB's requirement.
Table 2: Financed sub-loans in this reporting period
ESMS Number of sub-loans by environmental № PFIs approval categories date B C Total 1 JSICB «Ipak ВulТ» 24.05.2017 1 - 1 2 PJSCB «DAVR BANK» 15.05.2017 1 - 1 3 JSCB «Turonbank» 25.05.2017 - - 4 JSCB «Hamkorbank» 29.05.2017 6 2 8 5 JSCB «Asaka bank» 30.05.2017 - - - 6 JSCMB «Ipoteka bank» 25.05.2017 1 - 1 7 National Bank of Uzbekistan for Foreign 26.05.2017 18 - 18 Economic Activities 8 JSCB «Uzpromstroybank» 30.05.2017 9 - 9 Total 36 2 38
As of December 2018, a preliminary estimate indicates that the project has helped to establish 3,369 hectares (ha) of intensive orchards and 137 ha of water- and energy-saving greenhouses; increased refrigerated storage capacity by 68,200 tons (on the basis of one-off single load capacity), post-harvest processing capacity by 122,091 tons, and packaging material manufacture of 14 million square meters; and procured 179 units of agricultural machinery. Summary table of activities of Created capacity from disbursed subproject during the reporting period is given in the Table 3.
Table 3. Created capacity from disbursed subproject
№ Type of investment Unit of measure Capacity 1 Modern refrigeration storage Ton 68,200 2 Intense garden Hectare 3,369 3 Processing of horticulture complexes Ton 122,091 4 Modern greenhouse complexes Hectare 137 5 Manufacture of packing Sq.meter 14 million 6 Agriculture machinery and other Pcs. 179
According to paragraph (l) of Section 6.01 of the Subsidiary loan agreement, (SLA) PFIs are provided annual reports on the effectiveness of implementation of environmental and social measures. Tables 4 and 5 indicat summaries of extended subloans using ADB funds within the Horticulture Value Chain Development Project (HVCDP).
Table 4: Quantity of the total portfolio of innovations for the modernization of gardening by subcomponents : Number of Subprojects Purchase of Modern Processing of Modern № PFIs Intense Manufacture of agricultural refrigeration horticulture greenhouse Total garden packaging machinery storage products complexes and transport 1 NBU 20 2 10 15 2 49 2 Asaka bank 13 3 5 16 37 3 UzPSB 9 2 8 1 20 4 Ipoteka bank 9 1 3 6 1 20 5 Ipak Yuli bank 3 1 1 4 9 6 Turon bank 2 2 2 1 7 7 Hamkorbank 7 5 1 3 17 8 Davr bank 1 2 1 3 Total 63 12 25 56 2 4 162
Table 5 Breakdown of Subprojects by Region (as of December 2018) Processing of Refrigerated Intensive Horticultural Greenhouse Storage Orchard Products Complex Others Total
Value Value Value Value Value Value Region No ($ m) No ($ m) No ($ m) No ($ m) No ($ m) No ($ m) Karakalpakstan 3 0,705 2 1,119 5 1,823 Andijan 4 0,998 1 0,691 4 1,831 3 3,657 12 7,177 Bukhara 4 1,137 1 0,037 1 1,100 9 6,470 15 8,743 Jizzah 1 2,521 1 3,098 1 0,411 2 1,178 5 7,208 Kashkadarya 7 3,389 2 1,540 1 0,500 10 5,429 Navoi 6 8,703 6 8,703 Namangan 3 0,756 1 0,466 2 6,448 1 0,960 7 8,629 Samarkand 6 1,462 4 9,228 5 6,119 7 4,653 22 21,462 Sirdarya 1 1,411 1 0,220 6 14,568 8 16,199 Surkhandarya 12 4,971 3 8,333 3 1,410 1 0,495 19 15,209 Tashkent 3 1,618 3 3,587 4 6,734 8 11,460 3 6,186 21 29,585 Fergana 15 5,900 1 3,700 4 4,420 20 14,020 Khorezm 3 0,824 2 1,268 6 4,364 11 6,455 Total* 62 25.690 11 17.106 24 36.164 59 64.502 5 7.181 161 150.643 m = million, No = number. * Totals may not add precisely because of rounding. Source: Rural Restructuring Agency.
The establishment of modern energy- and water-saving greenhouses accounts for 6.8% of the number and 11.4% of the total value of subloans, processing of horticultural products accounts for 14.9% of the number and 24.0% of the value of subloans, and refrigerated storage accounts for 38.5% of the number and 17.1% of subloans value. There is a broad distribution across the all regions. The largest concentration in terms of subproject numbers is in Samarkand (22 subprojects), Tashkent (21 subprojects), and Fergana (20 subprojects). In subloan value terms, Tashkent ($29.6 million), Samarkand ($21.5 million), and Sirdarya ($16.2 million) are the largest regions (are the regions with the highest amount). Overall, the average subloan size is (equal to) $0.935 million. By region, average loan sizes vary from $0.365 million in Karakalpakstan to $2.025 million in Sirdarya. By subproject category, average subloan sizes range from $0.414 million for refrigerated storage to $2.060 million for Agricultural machinery and other. A map of financed projects in regions of the Republic of Uzbekistan is dedicated in the picture 1 below.
For each sub-project, a State Environmental Expertise (SEE) was carried out on the basis of a draft EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) and obtained an approval of the Environmental Conclusions of the State Committee for Ecology and Environmental Protection. Control over observance of the requirements of environmental legislation at the enterprises of each sub-project is assigned to the regional department for ecology and environmental protection (depending on which region and district the particular subproject belongs to). During the monitoring, the PFIs check that each sub borrower meets the requirements of the ESMS in accordance with the national regulations and requirements of ADB.
Monitoring and reporting of the implementation of safeguards requirements and procedures wТtСТn tСe establТsСed ESMS are prepared by PFIs. TСe PFIs’ quarterly progress reports Тnclude status of compliance with safeguards covenants. The PFIs submit to RRA (the EA) annual ES performance reports (Appendix 8 of the ESMS in Report and Recommendations to the President of ADB (RRP) lТnked document 12) by tСe end of January every year. Based on tСe PFIs’ annual reports, Rural Restructuring Agency (RRA) submits to ADB annual Safeguard Monitoring reports (Appendix 9 of the ESMS) by mid-February of the following calendar.
1.3 Project organization and environmental management team, including organizational relationships with PFIs, sub-borrowers etc.
7. During the reporting period, the organizational structure had some changes. A project management office (PMO) has been set up under the existing organization of Rural Restructuring Agency. According to the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of UzbekТstan dated 21.11.2018 №940, tСe Agency for ТmplementatТon of projects Тn tСe fТeld of agroindustry and food security was established (UZAIFSA) on the base of RRA. The PMO is provided with highly qualified staff and operational costs and it is responsible for monitoring the project implementation, including training, capacity development, and providing technical support to PFIs. In order to save the cost of engaging a large team of consultants for project management and to ensure efficient utilization of the loan fund allocated to project management (estimated at USD 3.0 million). PMO staff included in-house UZAIFSA specialists.
At the same time each PFI has established a project implementation unit (PIU) under its existing structure to oversee the implementation of the credit line activities at the respective PFI.
Figure 1: Project Organization Chart
Loan Agreement between ADB and MOF MOF and RRA
CWRD RRA
obligations to monitor implementation of PFI relending
During implementation PFIs submit to ADB through RRA: quarterly progress report; Project Agreements Statement of Utilization of Funds; annual reports on safeguards compliance
Asaka Bank, Davr Bank, Hamkorbank Ipak Yuli Bank, Ipoteka Bank,
accreditation)
ADB = Asian Development Bank; CWER = Environment, Natural Resources, and Agriculture Division of Central and West Asia Department of ADB; CWRD = Central and West Asia Department of ADB; MOF = Ministry of Finance; PFI = participating financial institution; PIU = project implementation unit; PMO = project management office; and RRA = Rural Restructuring Agency.
All PFIs have an assigned manager of environmental and social measures at full employment responsible for the preparation of annual reports on the environmental and social efficiency of ESMS. Environmental Management team for the project during this reporting period is shown in Table 6.
Table 6: Environmental Management Team for the Project Name Org Position Contact (email and/or tel.)
Gaybullaev Sayfullo RRA Environmental [email protected] Expert (part time) +998 90 933 3588
Diana Rakhimova RRA Environmental [email protected] Expert +998 99 8989099 (part time)
Dinara JSICB «Ipak ВulТ» ESMS Coordinator [email protected] Nurmukhamedova +998 (71) 140 6943
Gayrat Mahmudov PJSCB «DAVR BANK» ESMS Coordinator [email protected] +998(90) 909 0223
Abdurazakhov JSCB «Turonbank» Deputy of the Head [email protected] Alisher of Division +998 (71) 202 0101 Coordinator of the ESMS
Avazbek Fazliev JSCB «Hamkorbank» Head of sector for [email protected] environmental +998 (90) 253 0690 assessment and monitoring.
Mamajanov JSCB «Asaka bank» Head of Department (78) 120 82 96 [email protected]
Sherzod Boltaev JSCMB «Ipoteka bank» Head of Department [email protected] +9989(71) 150 8930
Aziz Aslanov National Bank of Coordinator of the [email protected] Uzbekistan for Foreign ESMS +9989(71) 234 1117 Economic Activities
Gapparov JSCB Coordinator of the [email protected] «Uzpromstroybank» ESMS +998 93 5953395
A PFI is responsible for conducting proper pre-investment inspection on prospective subborrowers Тn accordance wТtС tСe PFI’s prevaТlТng credТt and rТsk management polТcТes and procedures, and following appropriate commercial banking criteria together with past and ongoing environmental performance . In case if such inspection was not undertaken or is not undertaken in with appropriate level of rigor, the subborrower may be required to immediately repay to the PFI any disbursed funds and the PFI to repay such funds to MOF, in accordance with the terms of the SLA.
Part II Environmental issues
2.1. Environmental issues in the previous 12 months.
During the reporting period, the monitoring of subprojects was carried out by the UZAIFSA and PFI specialists who were specially trained and instructed in the framework of monitoring compliance of the Environmental Plan, labor and safety measures. The frequency of monitoring during conventional monitoring is as a rule, at least once every 6 months for projects with category "B". All inspections are documented in written form (Annex 8, template 3 with images supported - if necessary). All discrepancies observed in the past reporting period during the visit in 2018, have been significantly improved.
No major problems were identified during preparation, before and during construction. Household and sanitary standards for workers are currently being implemented or are being built, mainly in accordance with the standards and norms of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
Some non-compliance was observed during UZAIFSA site visits. Among them: untimely disposal of wastes from construction sites, not using of PPE by workers, non-satisfactory sanitarian conditions for dining facilities, solid and liquid waste, spills, garbage etc. After being notified, all non-compliances were eliminated.
Photographs of the site monitoring are given in Annex 2
No cases of non-compliances of requirements have been identified.
The nature and scale of impact on the environment is insignificant and cannot lead the quality of the environment to negative changes. 2.2. Explanations of instances in which environmental standards or guidelines were exceeded or environmental incidents happened
During the visits to the projects with refrigeration units in May of 2018, there were identified minor non-compliances, as: unsafe storage freon, garbage in cesspools, safety breach associated with the equipment of working personnel:
LLC “Kungrad Vek Stroy”- insignificant irregularities were revealed as: unsafe storage of freon, garbage in cesspools, rules for warehousing and storage of building materials were not complied with. LLC "Alisher Kipchak" - there was a smell from the activity on the territory. LLC "Mirzakhmedov Ravshan" - non-satisfactory sanitarian conditions for dining facilities, and garbage in the cesspool. The beneficiary was obliged to clean the pit as soon as possible.
During the visits to greenhouses in June of 2018, it was observed:
"Nukus Universal Base" LLC – a household garbage was observed in the project area. "Mangit Invest Plus" LLC - it was observed that there was no personal protective equipment when using fertilizer. Warehouses needed more thorough cleaning. Disruption of safety related to personnel equipment. In order to manage pesticides properly, the beneficiary was obliged to hire an agronomist soon. LLC "Sarbon Asl Savdo" - the company was scheduled on a contractual basis to use services for destruction of insects and plant diseases. In this connection, a warehouse construction for the storage of agrochemicals was not planned. The service on pesticide and herbicide management will be outsourced by beneficiary. Certified company will provide services in the use of pesticides, transportation and disposal. They were recommended to present a copy of the contract.
While visiting the sub-project on an ТntensТve garden, Тt was observed: “BaСt Imkon cСorvasТ” LLC: not organТzed storage of agrocСemТstry Тmproper СandlТng wСen usТng mТneral fertilizers and storage conditions of fertilizer. In this regard, the beneficiary undertook to hire a plant protection agronomist. The duties of the agronomist include working with chemicals for the destruction of pests, fungal diseases, pesticides, and the application of mineral fertilizers, compliance with safety regulations while working with agricultural chemistry, as well as the coordination with environmental and local authorities. The nature and scale of the environmental impact of all the above non-compliances are insignificant and cannot lead to negative changes in the quality of the environment. Recommendations for solving the above environmental problems are indicated in the paragraph 2.3. Prior to the implementation of any type of activity in the field of horticulture production, ESMS manager of eacС certaТn PFI’s Тnformed one by one all benefТcТarТes of tСe sub-projects on environmental and technical safety requirements. During the reporting period, any other issues related to noise and vibration, water and air quality have not been identified. There were no any accidents or emergency situation except a minor disruption. Complaints from nearby residential populations were not received. Environmental inspections are carried out by specialists of the district department for ecology and environmental safeguard in accordance with committee's internal environmental monitoring program. During the monitoring, the PFIs also checked the current environmental state of the sub-projects.
2.3. Recommendations are required to show how any exceedances will be prevented in the future.
Suggested recommendations for identified deficiencies in the sub-projects described above:
- improve the work on monitoring environmental protection and safety at construction sites and training workers and own personnel on environmental aspects, as well as conducting basic monitoring in accordance with the ZVOS.
- correct all the shortcomings and irregularities made during the work, tidy up collective protective equipment, clean the proper areas of rubbish, provide all workers with personal protective equipment, organize medical kits, equip electrical equipment and fire boards, organize safety and health nooks.
Keep all floors clean in the premises and prevent fertilizer from being carried by people or machines outside the project site Store each fertilizer in a separate container in a folding room or in a fixed place. The personnel must complete relevant training session or instruction.
Integrated methods of pest control with the rational use of both chemical and non-chemical methods of control.
It was also recommended to carry out activities aimed at ensuring the readiness of the object to actions to prevent, localize and eliminate the consequences of accidents or emergencies.
There were instructions, recommendations given to ensure healthy, and safety use of pesticides:
Wearing recommended protective clothing (long-sleeved shirt and trousers, socks, boots and gloves) in order to reduce exposure or skin contact;
• Chemically resistant shoes and gloves; • Use of safety glasses; • Use of approved respirators; • Stand on the windward side when using pesticides; • Avoid contact of food with pesticides; • When pouring pesticides, keep the container below eye level to prevent eye contact; • After handling pesticides, wash hands thoroughly with soap before eating or drinking;
It was clarified that timely disposal of waste, prevention of littering in the territory of projected objects will prevent negative impact on natural resources: soil, underground horizon. Part III: Compliance with ADB’s Social Protection Requirements and ADB’s Prohibited Investment Activities List
3.1 Provide assessment on these two sets of requirements.
ADB's requirements for social protection were met. According to the list of prohibited types of investment activities, a preliminary environmental screenings of social and safeguard measures were carried out. During of the project implementation, PFI specialists conducted a preliminary analysis (screening) of each sub-project with respect to social safeguard measures. “Among PFI’s experТence of rejectТon to fТnance several projects (project belongs to category B, however, the client did not present the required documents (state expert opinion, etc.); the client asked for funding the project of a poultry farm with more than 40 thousand hens,etc.) there is also experience rejection of the projects proceeding from the ADB’s ProСТbТted Investment ActТvТtТes LТst, for example, tСe clТent carrТes out actТvТtТes for the sale of alcohol. Prior to approval, subprojects were screened according to the following questions:
Involuntary Resettlement Impact Checklist
Screening Questions Yes No Remarks
If yes, exclude from 1. Will there be land acquisition using eminent domain law? financing
2. Will there be permanent or temporary loss of shelter and If yes, exclude from residential land due to land acquisition? financing.
3. Will there be permanent or temporary loss of agricultural If yes, exclude from and other productive assets due to land acquisition? financing.
4. Will there be losses of crops, trees, and fixed assets due to If yes, exclude from land acquisition? financing.
5. Will there be permanent or temporary loss of businesses or If yes, exclude from enterprises due to land acquisition? financing.
6. Will there be permanent or temporary loss of income If yes, exclude from sources and means of livelihoods due to land acquisition? financing.
7. If land or private property is purchased through negotiated If yes, exclude from settlement or willing buyer-willing seller, will it result in the financing. permanent or temporary removal or displacement of renters, or leaseholders?
8. If land or private property is purchased through negotiated If yes, exclude from settlement or willing buyer-willing seller, will it result in the financing. permanent or temporary removal or displacement of informal land-users (people without legal rights on the land) or squatters?
9. Will the project involve any permanent or temporary If yes, exclude from restrictions in land use or access to legally designated parks financing. or protected areas and cause people or any community to lose access to natural resources, traditional habitats, communal land, or communal facilities? 10. Will the project use government land or any public land or If yes, exclude from property, which will require the permanent or temporary financing. removal of informal occupants or users (residential or economic)?
During the preliminary monitoring at the sub-project areas, all the above questions were answered (NO) confirming the absence of impact caused to Involuntary Resettlement, which in turn does not hamper the financing of sub-projects.
PFIs specialists discussed, explained and clarified to the subprojects owners of all the requirements for the environmental and social safeguard that they should comply with during the implementation of the subproject.
3.1. A brief description of the taken measures.
During the monitoring conducted by the RRA in October-November 2018, it was noted that the corrective measures recommended in May 2018 were almost completely implemented. On the current visit, no significant environmental impacts have been detected.
Below are the measures taken by beneficiaries in order to eliminate the inconsistencies identified during the visit in May 2018.
LLC “MangТt Invest Plus” workers are provТded wТtС workwear, sСoes and gloves.
LLC “Nukus unТversal Base” and LLC “MТrzakСmedov RavsСan” Тncreased tСe number of garbage bins for waste collection and garbage, as well as the frequency of area cleaning.
LLC “AlТsСer KТpcСak” – spoilt vegetables are stored in closed containers to prevent unpleasant odors.
During the reporting period, incidents and accidents were not observed in the projects areas.
Part IV: ESMS operations (for PFIs which are financing B-category subprojects)
4.1. A brief description of the effectiveness of the ESMS within 12 months.
According to paragraph 5 of Schedule 2 in Loan agreement between Republic of Uzbekistan and ADB dated 03.03.2017, no withdrawal shall be made from the Loan account for a PFI for the purposes of any qualified subprojects until such PFI has established the ESMS in a manner satisfactory to ADB and has appointed designated staff who is capable and adequately trained in fully implementing the ESMS.
For each sub-project, a State Environmental Expertise (SEE) was carried out on the basis of a draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and obtained approval Environmental Conclusions of the State Committee for Ecology and Environmental Protection. Control over observance of the requirements of environmental legislation at the enterprises of each sub-project is assigned to the regional department for ecology and environmental protection (depending on which region and district the particular subproject belongs to).
During the monitoring, the PFIs check that each sub borrower meets the requirements of the ESMS in accordance with the national regulations and requirements of ADB. During the project implementation period, none of PFIs did face to significant environmental problems for each sub-project. There were no any exceedances in the frame of established norms for the current subprojects.
ADB's requirements for social protection were met. According to the list of prohibited types of investment activities, a preliminary screening of social safeguard measures were carried out. All requirements are implemented based on the documents of the ESMS. Implementation of corrective actions was not required.
Guided by the agreement on refinancing of part of the ADB loan, Article VI, Section 6.01, paragraph (l) of the PFIs provided annual reports on the effectiveness of implementation of environmental and social measures. In this report, information should be provided by PFIs and responsible persons for the implementation of the ESMS. At the end of January 2018 and the beginning of February 2019, all PFIs provided to RRA annual reports on the effectiveness of environmental and social measures implementation. Based on the analysis of the submitted reports, it can be seen that the process of subprojects review and approval was carried out in accordance with the national legal and normative acts of the Republic of Uzbekistan. The risk categorization was implemented on the base of the screening for the presence of environmental and social risks under the legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan and ADB requirements. All suprojects with category "B" passed pre-investment monitoring. Monitoring of environmental safeguard and social issues in the framework of sub loans was implemented particularly on a quarterly basis by the Bank staff. No issues related to social safeguard measures (land acquisition, individuals/commercials displacement, loss of income/livelihood) were observed. No cases of non-compliance of requirements have been identified.
Capacity building activities In order to increase the capacity, training sessions were organized in the framework of the project: - a seminar of ADB consultant Irakly Kavidadze (February 17, 2018); -a seminar of the Rural Restructuring Agency on environmental management for commercial banks (certificate of February 26, 2018) and other short-term seminars (trainings). - on April 19-21, 2018, ADB organТzed a “TraТnТng SemТnar and RegТonal ExcСange on MonТtorТng the Implementation of Environmental Safeguard Measures. TS 8663-Sustainable Environmental Management Projects in Central and West Asia" in Georgia. The workshop was aimed at environmental officers of project implementation teams (PIUs). Two members of RRA staff participated in this workshop. -presentatТon for PFI’s on tСe ТmplementatТon of envТronmental management and socТal Тssues was conducted by ADB Technical consultant Armine Yedigaryan, (December 10, 2018);
However, due to tСe PFIs’ staff turnover, Тt Тs necessary to conduct traТnТng for PFI Credit Specialists who consider the ADB sub-loan. Since sometimes there are difficulties in determining to which category of environmental risk the project belongs.
4.2. Specific data on the following activities is recommended
Site inspections and audits – to summarize the number and type of site visits.
Monitoring was carried out on a quarterly basis during a year. Audits by the banks were conducted in March, June, November and December of the reporting period, and the RRA implemented it in March, June, November, December. Totally 137 financed sub projects have been inspected out of 162. Monitoring of remained and newly financed projects will be conducted in the next reporting period. Prior to the implementation of any type of activity in the field of horticulture production, all beneficiaries of subprojects were aware of environmental and technical safety requirements. To the present day, problems related to noise and vibration, water and air quality have not been identified. There were no any accidents or emergency situation. During the monitoring, the PFIs also checked the current environmental state of the sub- projects.
Noncompliance case. Some non-compliance was observed during site visits. Among them: untimely disposal of wastes from construction sites, not using of PPE by workers, non-satisfactory sanitarian conditions for dining facilities, solid and liquid waste, spills, garbage etc. After being notified, all non-compliances were eliminated. Each subproject was provided with the recommendations on methods of storing waste and observing safety regulations. . Corrective action plans. No corrective action plans were required
Consultation and complaints. Prior to the financing of each subproject, the PFI specialist consulted the beneficiaries about the environmental and social requirements of ADB. In this, regard no complaint was received.
Part V: Conclusion and action plan 5.1. Conclusions.
The annual report on the monitoring of safeguard measures of the project provided information on the implementation of the project in the field of development of the value chain in the horticulture sector. Based on the PFI data, it can be concluded that the project helped to increase the productivity of farming activities, increase the processing and storage capacity and reduce post-harvest losses due to the implementation and improvement of intensive gardening practices, modern and efficient greenhouses and processing, storage and refrigeration capacities. PFIs have expanded the coverage of farmers and enterprises, during the implementation of the project, 162 subprojects were financed during 24 months. Each sub-project was carried out by SEE on the basis of the developed draft EIS and agreed Environmental Conclusions of the State Committee for Ecology and Environmental Protection. During the project implementation period, within 24 months, PFI did not faced to significant environmental problems for each sub-project.
PFIs provided annual reports to RRA on the effectiveness of environmental and social measures. It should also be noted that while preparing the annual reports of the PFI, there were some difficulties related to environmental issues. The reason for this was the frequent changes of the responsible staff within the PFIs.
Thus, compliance with the policies and procedures of the ESMS will lead to long-term of economic and environmental sustainability and increased profitability for farmers and agribusinesses.
5.2. Action plan for the next reporting period.
Compliance of the PFIs to project agreement covenants is monitored through periodic ADB review missions, quarterly progress reports by the PFIs, random spot checks of subloan documents, and review of the PFIs' audited financial statements. An environmental specialist hired by the PMO (based in RRA) will help monitor PFIs’ training and carry out monitoring site visits, also assist to PFIs in the implementation of ESMS, including the preparation of Annual Environmental and Social (ES) performance reports of the PFIs and ensure on-time completion of the annual report on ESMS. If necessary, will assist to PFIs and beneficiaries of environmental and social issues. See the table 7 below. In the framework of project implementation, training sessions on environmental awareness will be provided for PFIs. In order to conduct the trainings consulting company will be hired. The Terms of Reference for the consultant was prepared and approved by ADB on 11.09.2018. The hired consultant will conduct a two-day seminar in 13 regions, namely, 26 training sessions in accordance with the approved schedule. Please see the annex (3) of ToR . During ADB mission on December 5-11, 2018 RRA proposed to make updates on existing Procurement Plan and on December 19, 2018 RRA sent updated Procurement plan for ADB’s review and approval. Training sessions are planning to be held on Q2-3 2019.
Table 7: The monitoring action plan of the RRA Environmental Specialist
№ Region
March March April May June July August September October November December 1 Karakalpakistan Republic 2 Khorezm 3 Bukhara 4 Navoiy 5 Kashkadarya 6 Surkhandarya 7 Namangan 8 Andijan 9 Fergana 10 Samarkand 11 Jizzakh 12 Syrdarya 13 Tashkent region
RRA specialists, will carry out monitoring according to the ESMS during the next reporting period January 2019 – February 2020. Annexes Annual ESMS performance reports by PFIs. Please see the Annex (4) Table 8: Information on all loans Any outsta Safeguard nding category envir onme
ntal
and
IR
and Type of Value IP Sub- Tenor loan of issues project of Industry (large exposur durin using Name of Sub-project loan Sector corporate/ e g ADB (mont SME/trade (thousa repor funds hs) Env IR IP finance) nd US$) ting (yes/no) perio d and action s taken to addre ss the issues JSICB «Ipak Yuli»
LTD "Asl Tabiat Bog'lari" SME 119 3 600,0 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes
2 690,60 Intensive LTD "ECO AGRO CHROMOS" SME 48 B C N/A No Yes 5 garden
"HOJI GADOYBOY OTA" SME 116 1 500,0 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes FARMING ENTERPRISE
"BAYTQO`RGON-ARIPOV Refrigerated SME 49 991,25 B C N/A No Yes XAITVOY" а и и store Equipment for processing 47 495,0 "MAX POWER" LTD SME of agriculture B C N/A No Yes products (drying) 55 195,545 Greenhouse LTD UZAGROTEK GROUP SME B C N/A No Yes Refrigerated 58 181,0 SAGDIYANA FORM LTD SME store B C N/A No Yes
Refrigerated MUATTAROVLAR 58 146,6 SME store B C N/A No Yes MAHSULOTLARI Х Х А
"HOJI GADOYBOY OTA" SME 84 999 989 Gardening B C N/A No Yes FARMING ENTERPRISE
OOO " JAXON IDEAL SERVICE SME 60 180 000 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes " PJSCB «DAVR BANK» Small Processing of "BULUNGUR-SANDVIK" LLC 1 383,0 Business 60 agricultural B C N/A No Yes JV products Small 334,946. "ROYAL ROSES" LLC Business 37 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes 5 Small "ORGANIK GREEN FOOD" 116000, Business 60 Greenhouse B C N/A NO Yes LLC 0 JSCB «Turonbank» Long term "Sarbon Asl Savdo" LTD. 72 440 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes credit Long term 84 393 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes “TОxМСorvКsОrvТs” LTD. credit Commercial firm of manufacturing Long 60 490 Cold storage B C N/A No Yes “SСurМСТ MОbОl” termcredit Long term “NuroboН” LTD. 60 2000 Cold storage B C N/A No Yes credit Processing of Long - 84 312 agricultural B C N/A No Yes “EAST WEST SURXON“LTD. termcredit products Processing of Long term 120 3400 agricultural B C N/A No Yes “O'ZMATBAA TA'MINOT“LTD. credit products Purchase of Long term 120 5000 farm C C N/A No Yes “AGROVER“ LTD. credit machinery JSCB «Hamkorbank»
“Nukus UnТvОrsКl BКгКsТ” LTD SME 84 641,5 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes Intensive SME 60 691,0 B C N/A No Yes “BКxt Imkon RТvoУ CСorvКsТ” ПКrm garden Processing of “AnНТУon-Un” LTD SME 84 250,0 agricultural B C N/A No Yes products
“RukСsСКboН AРro SКСovКt” LTD SME 72 350,0 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes
“NКvoТв AгТвК TrКns SОrvТs” PE SME 120 150,0 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes
“TОmТr TulКРКn BoРlКrТ” ПКrm SME 84 99,6 Cold storage B C N/A No Yes
“UstК SКlТmСoУТ” PE SME 84 200,0 Cold storage B C N/A No Yes
“FursКt MКСorКt” PE SME 120 232,7 Cold storage B C N/A No Yes Intensive SME 84 36,6 B C N/A No Yes «BoqТ SКrвon» LTD garden Processing of «AbНumКlТk BКrКkК SКvНo» LTD SME 84 124,3 agricultural B C N/A No Yes products «SСКmКtov Brok TrОвН» LTD SME 60 247,2 Cold storage B C N/A No Yes «BКrКkК MОvК SКnoКt SОrvТs» LTD Intensive SME 84 289,0 B C N/A No Yes garden «Sulton Bobo» ПКrm Purchase of SME 60 135,0 farm C N/A No Yes machinery «AРroОlТt PКrkОnt» LTD Intensive SME 84 836,0 B C N/A No Yes garden «YonКrТq DКvr IstТqbolТ» LTD Intensive SME 60 60,0 C N/A No Yes garden «BОst ButtОr ProНuМtТon» LTD SME 120 69,0 Cold storage B C N/A No Yes JSCB «Asaka bank» Long term LLC «MКnРТt InvОst Plвs» 60 477,0 Greenhouse В C N/A No Yes credit Dried Long term 84 494,2 agricultural C N/A No Yes PE «PoвtuР' BКrkКmol QurТlТsС» credit В products Dried Long term 84 446,4 agricultural C N/A No Yes LLC «BКrkКmol AvloН QКlqonТ» credit В products Dried Long term 84 100,0 agricultural C N/A No Yes LLC «Asl MОvК InvОst» credit В products Dried Long term 84 650,0 agricultural C N/A No Yes PE «BunвoН sОrvТs lвuks» credit В products Long term 60 1 502,2 Greenhouse C N/A No Yes LCC «SКbo HКmkor» credit В Dried «AnНТУon Оxport КnН Тmport busТnОss Long term 60 316,4 agricultural C N/A No Yes credit В solutТons» products Long term Greenhouse 60 1 998,8 C N/A No Yes LLC «JonНor QurТlТsС InvОst» credit and cold store В Long term 60 450,0 Greenhouse C N/A No Yes LLC «EltОk Eksk lвuгТv» credit В FКrm EnrОprТsО «UktКm Buston Long term 84 450,0 Greenhouse В C N/A No Yes SКxovКtТ» credit The Long term production of LLC «GКlК RТvОr» 60 1 100,0 В C N/A No Yes credit concentrated grape juice Long term 84 2 000,0 Greenhouse C N/A No Yes LLC «GrКnН BukСКrК КРro» credit В Long term 250,0 Greenhouse C N/A No Yes LLC «KonРrОs BКrКkК AРro» credit 60 В Long 60 960,0 Greenhouse C N/A No Yes LLC «Mo’УТгК КРro sОrvТМО» termcredit В Long term 60 180,0 Greenhouse C N/A No Yes LLC «KОlКУКk tК’mТr sКvНo sОrvТМО» credit В Dried Long term 60 280,0 agricultural C N/A No Yes «BotТr IsКОv» FКrm EntОrpТsО credit В products Long 84 700,0 Greenhouse C N/A No Yes LLC «ApplО UnТvОrsКl SОrvТМО» termcredit В Long term «OМСТlov JКvoxТr Uгum BoР» FКrm 60 386,0 Greenhouse C N/A No Yes Enterpise credit В LLC «SКmКrkКnН TОmТr BОton Long term 60 546,4 Greenhouse В C N/A No Yes KonstruktsТвК» credit Dried «UrРut ElОktro SОrvТМО» FКrm Long 84 225,6 agricultural C N/A No Yes Enterpise termcredit В products Long term 60 580,0 Greenhouse C N/A No Yes LLC «SСoСУКСon Bobur BoРlКrТ» credit В Dried Long term 84 1 810,0 agricultural C N/A no Yes «IntОnsТv РolН ПruТt» FКrm EntОrpТsО credit В products Long 60 5 000,0 Greenhouse C N/A No Yes PE LLC «SТrНКrТnskТв BОrОР» termcredit В Long term 60 5 000,0 Greenhouse C N/A No Yes LLC «MТrгКoboН UnТvОrsКl TrКНО» credit В Long term 84 1 000,0 Greenhouse C N/A No Yes LLC «XoУТ BoСoНТrСon otК» credit В Dried Long 60 325,0 agricultural C N/A No Yes LLC «Nulu FКвг Imkon» termcredit В products Dried Long term 84 5 000,0 agricultural C N/A No Yes «SurСon obТ СКвot» FКrm EntОrpТsО credit В products Long term «EгРulТk SКrТ AРro» FКrm EntОrpТsО 60 1 970,0 Greenhouse В C N/A No Yes credit Long Intensive 60 897,0 C N/A No Yes LLC «RТv MКkon» termcredit garden В Dried Long term 60 493,0 agricultural C N/A No Yes LLC «MuС PlКst SОrvТМО» credit В products Dried FКmТlв ОntОrprТsО «NoНТrК DТвor Long term 60 150,0 agricultural C N/A No Yes credit В MОvКlКrТ» products Dried Long 84 3 167,9 agricultural C N/A No Yes LLC «ZТmnТв SКН» termcredit В products Dried Long term 60 390,0 agricultural C N/A No Yes LLC «CСoНКk SКrНor ПКrm sОrvТs» credit В products Dried Long term 60 118,0 agricultural C N/A No Yes LLC «YoгКvon MКrvКrТНТ» credit В products Long 60 1 092,8 Greenhouse C N/A No Yes LLC «AlТ KusСМСТ AРro Оxport» termcredit В Long term Intensive 120 4 750,0 C N/A No Yes LLC «SКР AРro» credit garden В Long Intensive 120 1 924,0 C N/A No Yes LLC «SКР AРro BulunР'ur» termcredit garden В JSCMB «Ipoteka bank» Agricultural JV "Nisi Multifruits Trade" SME 60 667 C N/A No Yes processing В "Dilrabo-94" LLC SME 60 156,2 Cold storages В C N/A No Yes "Jamshid Javohir Agrotexservis" SME 60 450 Greenhouse C N/A No Yes LLC В «NAVOIYAGRO» LLC SME 84 1500 Greenhouse В C N/A No Yes "Suvon Omonturdi" PE SME 60 200 Cold storages В C N/A No Yes "FКrovon TОrmТг CСorvК» LLC SME 60 250 Cold storages В C N/A No Yes Dryer fruits "Dil shams qamar" LLC SME 60 265,9 and В C N/A No Yes vegetables «OгoНbОk -SОrvТs» LLC SME 60 390 Greenhouse В C N/A No Yes Intensive SME 84 992,6 C N/A No Yes "MКrokКnН КРro ТnvОst» FКrmТnР garden В "Pastdarg'om Erkin Sabzavotlari" SME 60 1000 Greenhouse В C N/A No Yes Farming "Platina Parnik Servis" LLC SME 60 500 Greenhouse В C N/A No Yes "TASHKENT TRUST TRADE" LLC SME 48 250 Cold storages В C N/A No Yes "Qiziriq ximiyaviy ugit" LLC SME 60 244,7 Cold storages В C N/A No Yes Greenhouse «PERFECT LOGISTICS» LLC SME 60 1090,8 and cold В C N/A No Yes storages Production of SME 60 948,5 C N/A No Yes «MТllОr GrКnН KКpТtКl» PE beverages В Manufacture “RКvsСКn YoНТk ProНuМtТon” LLC SME 60 500,3 carton boxes В C N/A No Yes for fruits «MТrгКСКmНОov RКvsСКn» PE SME 60 250 Cold storages В C N/A No Yes "Turkiston Mirishkorlari" LLC SME 60 376,8 Cold storages В C N/A No Yes "Yogdu Fayz bogdorchilik" Farming SME 60 798,5 Cold storages В C N/A No Yes “FКвгlТ Omon”LLC SME 60 168,7 Cold storage В C N/A No Yes National Bank of Uzbekistan for Foreign Economic Activities Muhammad Mironshoh LTD SME 60 760 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes Processing of Agro Feed LTD SME 72 3 386 agricultural B C N/A No Yes products Processing of Agro Processing Group LTD SME 72 4 656 agricultural B C N/A No Yes products JE LLC OLCHAZOR IMPEX SME 60 1 988 Cold storages B C N/A No Yes Processing of Musaffo Iqlim Service LLC SME 60 1 992 agricultural B C N/A No Yes products LLC KRISTALL-FUYUN SME 60 698 Cold storages B C N/A No Yes INDUSTRIES CHASHMA TOMCHI LTD SME 60 598,5 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes AZIZ AGRO IMKON SANOAT SME 60 579,8 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes HAZORBOG SHIRIN SME 60 198 Cold storages B C N/A No Yes MEVALARI LTD SHAHRUZA DIYOR NAVOIY SME 60 498 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes LTD GABO LTD SME 60 165 Cold storages B C N/A No Yes Ozodbek Azamatbek FE SME 60 120 Cold storages B C N/A No Yes Alisher Qipshaq LTD SME 60 306,40 Cold storages B C N/A No Yes 199,8 Kungrad Vek Story LTD SME 60 Cold storages B C N/A No Yes M GULOM LTD SME 60 198,5 Cold storages B C N/A No Yes TOMATO PLANT INVEST LLC SME 60 1 280 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes Askarov Narimon FARMING SME 60 546,4 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes ENTERPRISE Navbahor Fayz Export LTD SME 84 340,0 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes BAXT HARAKAT MEVALARI SME 60 620,3 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes LTD Processing of agricultural JIZZAKH LEADER FOOD LTD SME 60 780,0 B C N/A No Yes products and cold storages Processing of TASHABUS DO'RMON SME 60 267,7 agricultural B C N/A No Yes FARMING ENTERPRISE products PISKENT PARRANDA LTD SME 60 2 320 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes Sharq Yulduz Fayz LTD SME 60 1 095,0 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes Sunday Busniess Group LTD SME 60 1 210,0 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes Intensive Zomin Meva Logistika LTD SME 60 5 000,0 garden and B C N/A No Yes Cold storages Processing of Mushtari Oqdaryo LTD SME 60 3 181,0 agricultural B C N/A No Yes products Shirin Agro Nur LTD SME 60 567,8 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes Processing of agricultural Farma Servis LTD SME 60 932,8 B C N/A No Yes products and Cold storages Refrigeration Eshnazar Invest LTD SME 60 210 C C N/A No Yes truck Processing of Master Global Plus LTD SME 60 4 878,1 agricultural B C N/A No Yes products Intensive Toshkentvino kombinati SME 60 685,9 C N/A No Yes garden Fresh Fruits Export LTD SME 60 635 Cold storages B C N/A No Yes “DТвorbОk ZКmonbОk”LLC SME 60 254,9 Cold storages B C N/A No Yes а а ELIT KARTON BOKS SME 500,0 а а и C C N/A NO Yes . Agricultural "TOSHKENTVANO " SME 60 685,9 machinery C C N/A NO Yes technology “MAKS BUILDING INDUSTRY” SME 60 415,0 Cold storage B C N/A NO Yes AZIMJON NURIDDIN SAVDO SME 60 123,0 Cold storage B C N/A NO Yes SERVIS LLC SME Processing N/A ARAMATI BAGDADA PE 60 600 and storing frui B C NO Yes and vegetables SME N/A OLTIARIQ AGRO FAYZ LLC 60 198,6 Cold storage B C NO Yes SME N/A ECO EXPORT TRADE LLC 60 901,5 Cold storage B C NO Yes SME N/A GRAND DIAMOND FRUITS 60 500 Cold storage B C NO Yes SME N/A MIR GRANITA 60 486,5 Cold storage B C NO Yes YUKSALISH CHORVA SME N/A 60 101,4 Cold storage B C NO Yes SAHOVATI FE GOLDEN FRUIT PRODUCTION SME N/A 60 117 Greenhouse B C NO Yes FE SME N/A AGRO EXPORT BARAKA LLC 84 2 000 Greenhouse B C NO Yes UZUN MEVA SABZAVOT SME N/A 60 185 Cold storage B C NO Yes XOLODILNIK LLC KOSONSOY SERHOSIL SME Intensive N/A 84 4 632 B C NO Yes INTEVSIV BOGLARI LLC garden ALP JAVOKHIR JAVLONBEK SME N/A 84 1 000 Greenhouse B C NO Yes LLC ISLOMBEK FIRDAVS AGRO SME N/A 72 326,7 Greenhouse B C NO Yes LLC
JSCB «Uzpromstroybank» 129 800, SME 60 Cold storage B C N/A No Yes LLC”EmТr pКrrКnНК” 0 Processing of 1 000 00 LLC “XorКгm qovunlКrТ” SME 60 agricultural B C N/A No Yes 0,0 products 193 256, SME 60 Cold storage B C N/A No Yes LLC “SКrkor quruvМСТ” 0 2 000 00 SME 84 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes LLC “ZКrКПsСon JКsur NКvoТв” 0,0 440 000, SME 84 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes LLC “KoРon mОРК trКns” 0 Processing of 710 200, agricultural LLC “NКrpКв OptТmum” SME 84 B C N/A No Yes 0 products and cold storage 535 000, SME 60 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes LC “LТНОr bОst tomКto” 0 499 440, LLC “AR LoРТstТМs VОРОtКblОs SME 60 Greenhouse B C N/A No Yes FruТts” 5 Greenhouse 1 500 00 SME 84 and cold B C N/A No Yes LLC “Surxon KombТnКtТ” 0,0 storage Processing of 300 000, SME 72 agricultural B C N/A No Yes LLC “InНТРo trКНО” 0 products 296 150, SME 60 Cold storage B C N/A No Yes LLC “IsroТl IsmoТl XКmkor” 0 SME 513 930 N/A "Porlok ostonК КРroПТrmКsТ " 60 Greenhouse B No Yes ,0 SME 256 870 N/A “ExprОss TОrmТnКl SКvНo” 60 Cold storage B No Yes ,0 SME 98 430, Processing of N/A “UrРut MКrvКrТНТ” 36 agricultural B No Yes 0 products Ч "ASLIDIN ABDUXOLIK SME 450 000 N/A 60 Cold storage B No Yes 2005" ,0 SME 390 585 N/A “KТtob КРroplКst” 60 Cold storage B No Yes ,0 SME 150 000 N/A “KТtob tОxКvtomКtТkК” 48 Cold storage B No Yes ,0 SME 4 215 1 Greenhouse N/A “ KКrmКnК AРrotrОНТnР” 120 B No Yes 99,47 SME 976 000 Greenhouse N/A 84 B NO Да "AVTOMOBILCHIА" ,0 SME 498 750 N/A "DТКmonН TrКvОl" 60 Cold storage B NO ,0 Да Annex 2: Site photographs 1.KUNGRAD VED STROY. 2.KUNGRAD VED STROY
Rules for warehousing and storage of building materials were not complied with construction garbage in project site
3. MANGIT INVEST PLYUS 4. NUKUS UNIVERSAL BASE
Household waste
5. MIRZAKMEDOV RAVSHAN 6. MIRZAKMEDOV RAVSHAN
Garbage in the cesspool
6 .MIRZAKMEDOV RAVSHAN 7. BAHT IMKON CHORVASI
SARBON ASL SAVDO
Needs for an Agronomyst
Some photos of regional sub-project
LLC «NAVOIВ AGRO»
«KARMANA AGRO TRADING»
Hydroponic 11 hectares
"UKTAM BOTON SAXOVATI "
Hydroponic Office, workers place for rest
"SARQOR QIRUVCHI"
Cold storages
"EMIR Parranda”
Cold storages
«ANDIJAN EXPORT AND IMPORT BUSINESS SOLUTIONS»
«POYTUG’ BARKAMOL QURILISH»
ANNEX 3
HORTICULTURE VALUE CHAIN DEVELOPMENT PROJECT with the participation of the Asian Development Bank Terms of reference to provide training and capacity development to PFIs in the assessment, monitoring and management of environmental and social protection measures of the sub-loans implemented in the horticulture sector.
A. Background The Republic of Uzbekistan received a loan from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) in the amount of us $ 154.0 million for the implementation of "Horticulture value chain development" project. The project is implemented in all regions of the Republic of Uzbekistan, including the Republic of Karakalpakstan, in the period from 2017 to 2021. The main objective of the project is to increase the production of competitive horticulture products, oriented to international markets and meeting international quality standards in these markets. The main beneficiaries of the project are farmers and dehkan farmers, producers of agricultural products, agro-processing enterprises, owners and operators of refrigeration units, suppliers of trade and logistics services, packing enterprises that are part of the value chain. The secondary beneficiaries are participating financial institutions by improving skills in methods of financing the horticulture sector. Within the framework of component 2: the capacity of PFIs to implement environmental protection measures and social protection is envisaged, Agency for implementation of projects in the field of agroindustry and food security (UZAIFSA) intends to hire and attract a consulting firm (hereinafter referred to as the Consultant), which will be entrusted with the work on training in rules and procedures for management of protective measures (both environmental protection and social protection), assistance in the development of the system of environmental and social management of ESMS, as well as conduct environmental supervision and monitoring trainings, for this purpose, a competitive selection with CQS procurement method will be held in accordance with the ADB Guidelines on the use of consultants for the conclusion of this contract for consulting services. The contract for consulting services will be financed from the loan of the Asian Development Bank, allocated for the work on capacity building within the project.
B. Objectives
The main objective of the consultant will be to build the capacity of the PFI in the implementation of environmental measures in accordance with national legislation and ADB requirements, in particular the creation of environmental and social management system (ESMS). C. Scope of the work The consultant will develop training materials and conduct training workshops, which should cover the following sections: The consultant will have to perform the objectives assigned under the contract, while being in Tashkent and other regions (areas) of Uzbekistan. a) ADB’s Protective policy for investment project financing:
(i) Information on the terms of the credit line; (ii) policy guidelines on protective measures ADB; (iii) legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan on environmental protection. Existing discrepancies between the requirements of the Asian Development Bank and the legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan concerning protective measures and ways of their coordination; (iv) types of protective measures, environmental aspects, institutional a UZAIFSA Agreements. (v) Categorization of the ADB projects, environmental category - FI; (vi) Gender approaches in the professional and social environment, international conventions on gender development. Integrated gender approach in credit operations. b) Mechanisms for implementing the system of environmental and social management:
(i) Environmental and social strategy and applicable requirements; (ii) Establishment of the ESMS and project evaluation; (iii) The system of environmental and social management: the main elements; (iv) Environmental and social management procedures: . screening and category assignment - Category C project, Category В project: . Integrated assessment, . monitoring and reporting compliance. (v) ESMS Toolkit: Templates (8): 5 templates for approval, 3 templates for implementation (monitoring and reporting); (vi) Bringing existing ESMS in accordance with the requirements of ADB; (vii) Problems with implementation of ESMS and recommended improvements.
(c) Complaint mechanism:
(i) a mechanism for reviewing and responding to complaints; (ii) Local mechanism for handling and responding to complaints; (iii) Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On appeals of individuals and legal persons"; (iv) ADB Reporting Mechanism; (v) Recommendations for improving handling of complaints. Target audience: Participating financial organizations: National Bank for Foreign Economic Activity of the Republic of Uzbekistan, JSCB "Asaka Bank", JSCB "Turon Bank", JSCB "Uzpromstroybank", JSCIB "IpotekaBank", JSCIB "Ipak Yuli Bank", PJSCB "Davr Bank" and Hamkor Bank.
General requirements for training:
The total number of participants in training seminars should be at least 170 specialists, at least 34 people should participate in each seminar. The consultant should conduct a two-day seminar in 5 regions according to the attached schedule, namely, 26 training sessions in accordance with the approved schedule. (Annex 1). Each participant of the seminar should be provided with the appropriate handouts (information materials, a package with a textbook on the topic, a notebook and pen, and a newsletter for projects). In the process of training it is necessary to present the seminar materials on a large screen (PPT). Training seminars should be conducted in Russian and Uzbek languages (if necessary, through the services of an interpreter). Each training workshop should include lunch and coffee break for the participants (during the break). Basic information about potential participants: . Expected number of participants: at least 170 people . Level of knowledge / expertise / practical experience in the field / area of training: Most of them are familiar with the training seminar.
Consultant’s obligations:
(i) Preparation of the curriculum and materials for the training seminar according to above mentioned objectives, which will be agreed with the UZAIFSA within 14 working days after the entry into force of the treaty; (ii) Training materials will be divided into sections based on the topic of study; (iii) Training materials are subject to preliminary approval of the UZAIFSA; (iv) All materials in Russian and Uzbek, and one complete set of educational material, including presentations in the Power Point program in Russian, should be submitted to the environment expert of the UZAIFSA, at least one week before the training course; (v) The consultant should conduct seminars in accordance with the final schedule agreed with the UZAIFSA; (vi) Questionnaire survey of participants at the end of each training seminar on the "degree of satisfaction": the level of preparedness of the consultant, the relevance of seminar materials to its topic, the need to make additions to the materials of the training seminar; (vii) The office equipment for the training seminars will be provided by the consultant. Assistance from UZAIFSA UZAIFSA will assist the consultant in ensuring the attendance of participants from participating commercial banks, as well as providing the necessary information for the implementation of this training.
Qualification: For the successful completion of the task participation of the following key experts and assistants is required * Team leader (1 specialist/Non-key expert) (i) Project management and management of the team of specialists; (ii) development of a detailed work plan and methodology for the study; (iii) Monitoring and responsibility for the progress of the work, ensuring their implementation in due time; (iv) preparation of reports in Russian and English (v) Finalization of reports on the results of the received comments. The consultant should have experience in the preparation of training plan and materials related to training seminars on the proposed topic. * Lecturer (1 International lecturer/key expert) and training assistant (1 key expert). The lecturer (international lecturer) and the training assistant must meet the following minimum requirements: Higher and / or special education, at least 5 years of experience in the last 7 years in the preparation of materials and training seminars on the issues under consideration in the TOR; Diploma in the field of environmental protection or relevant qualifications; Experience with projects of the Asian Development Bank or similar international financial institutions; Fluency in Russian, Uzbek and English (oral and written); Excellent writing skills. The consultant is responsible for planning and implementing the entire learning process. Training should include skills that will help participants perform their objectives more effectively. Training should include a person-center approach. The training instructor should use a skill-based methodology and try to avoid long theoretical sessions, and include case studies with examples.
Qualification requirements for applicants: Applications for participation in the tender can be submitted by consulting companies/ institutions/organizations that have extensive experience and legal right (competent) to sign the contract, whose activities are directly related to the purpose of the proposed consultation and can show the required professional profile. Consultants should submit proposals (technical and financial) together with CVs of the assumed experts for training. The technical proposal from any applicants should include the following items: 1. Purpose of the Terms of Reference; 2. Expected results; 3. Special working approach and work plan; 4. Approximate time and date of execution; 5. Resume of experts involved for training (name / position in the company/qualifications/tasks for each member / number of working days), experience in this area. 6. Financial proposal containing a budget estimate with a full price breakdown by items.
Reporting
During the implementation of this assignment, Consultant will submit the following reports to the Customer: c) Initial report: must be submitted within 14 days after the service start date. Develop proposals for the curriculum for each section, including the purpose of the training, the training topic, structure of the seminar, main content of the seminar, training of the group members, the result of the training, the training methodology, and all this to discuss with the UZAIFSA specialist for interaction and approval; - Develop training material, including a manual for the instructor; teaching materials should be presented both in electronic form and in paper form. Training materials should be prepared and presented in Uzbek, Russian and English. d) Final report: After the completion of the training course, within 14 days, the Consultant must submit a preliminary final report to the UZAIFSA specialist, in turn, the UZAIFSA should examine and submit its comments to the service representative within one week of receipt of the report. This report should include a full review of the seminars held, results obtained from the questionnaire survey, an analysis of questions and answers, and recommendations for improving conduct of such training seminars; After receiving comments from the UZAIFSA, the Consultant should submit a final report (in Uzbek, Russian and English) to the UZAIFSA specialist within one week both in paper and electronic form (Microsoft Word and Power Point). After the planned training seminars, the consultant provides a detailed report on the training seminars, including the following aspects: . copies of training materials (electronic and printed)); . detailed video and audio recordings (on DVD) and photographs (photo albums) of the training workshops; . the results of the survey, including an analysis of the responses; . PR and media reports on the conducted training. . Recommendations for improving the delivery of training seminars in the future. The reports will be presented in English, Russian and Uzbek languages in hard copy and in electronic form in MS Office format.
Schedule (preliminary) of Implementation objectives and preparation of Documents, from the date of signing the contract:
Proposal for the curriculum. Proposals should be agreed March - April 2019 and approved by the staff of UZAIFSA: Development a training program and materials. The first April 2019 curriculum, training plan and teaching material. Preliminary discussion of training material with Staff of UZAIFSA Agreeing on the final points for the training April 2019 program
Implementation of the training program: May 2019
Training reports will be presented: June 2019
Type of contract:
UZAIFSA management will sign a contract with the appointed Consultant in accordance with the legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan and the requirements of ADB; During the term of the contract, the consultant shall: . be insured against accidents and have a professional/ medical / travel insurance policy, etc. . to organize a place for seminars, as well as to provide the equipment necessary for the implementation and conduct of training.
All correspondence with the Customer should be conducted by the following address: A gency for implementation of projects in the field of agroindustry and food security
Labzak st. 1 A. Tashkent, Uzbekistan tel.: (+998 71) 241 33 30 E-mail: [email protected] Annex Training Courses held by regions
№ Areas of training courses Number of training Number of days 1 Andijan region (Andijan,Fergana, 1 2 and Namangan regions) 2 (Tashkent city, regions of Tashkent 1 2 and Sirdaryo) 3 Samarkand region 1 2 (Samarkand ,Navoiy Djizak regions) 4 Bukhara region (Bukhara Kashkadarya, 1 2 Surhandaryo regions) 5 Khorezm region (the Republic of Karakalpakstan and Khorezm 1 2 region) ANNEX 4
Annual report of PJSCB “DAVR BANK” on the environmental and social performance
1. Please provide the answers to the questions below. Please include additional sheets or attachments as needed to provide detailed information on matters for which the answers are in the affirmative. Bank must submit an annual report on the implementation to ADB
Name of Financial Institution PJSCB “DAVR BANK” Completedspecialist (full name): Abubakirov Nuritdin Saydiganiyevich Head of risk Position in the organization: Date: 31, 2018 management division
A. Information on the portfolio
The period of coverage of the report: From: Till: Jan. 01, 2018 Dec. 31, 2018
2. Please provide the following information about your portfolio, where applicable in the reporting period:
B. Type of activity
The overall effect
issued at the end of the Average loan size (or Product line Description last fiscal year (in transaction) (in US$) US$)
Loans and other financial Micro financing 6 380 864,44 595,01 products for physical entities
Loans and other financial Small business products for physical entities 1 021 349,23 5 836,28 and individual entrepreneurs
Long term: Transactions for a period longer than 12 months
Any lending, leasing and other financial support to corporate Micro financing entities or entities, that are not 12 430 984,52 7 887,68 individuals, deal with less than 45 000 US dollars 2
Any lending, leasing and other financial support to corporate Small business entities or entities, that are not 9 829 117,66 93 610,64 individual, deal with less than 300 000 US dollars
Other Any lending, leasing and other financial support to corporate Other (if applicable) entities or entities, that are not 5 964 249,59 542 204,51 individual, deal with more than 300 000 US dollars
C. Impacton on the horticulture 3. Please provide the estimated percentage of the total loan portfolio of horticulture: % of the loan portfolio of horticulture Industry Sector value chain development project Fruit seedlings 0
Vegetable seeds 0
Refrigeration warehouses 0 Technological line for drying fruits and 81 vegetables processing line for mung beans 0
Packaging equipment 0
Greenhouse 19 Note: Please attach environmental and social audits or expert reports, test reports on environmental and social risks for each project of the company, subject to availability.
4. If there is a long-term financing of horticulture, please provide information on all loans to: (I) for a period longer than 12 months; and (II) the sum of the loan is not more than 5 000 000 US dollars. 5. Any The outstanding project is Protection environmen due to the Category
Value Value
(US$) (US$)
(Small
project
Sector* Sector*
impacts impacts
months) Industry Industry tal and IR line of the
Loan type Loan
Business / / Business
Name of the of Name
Loan term (in term Loan and IP Asian
Trade Finance) Trade
3
issues Developm during the ent Bank period of (yes / no) drafting the
reports and
IP IR actions ENV taken to address issues
JV Agrofirm Small 60 1 383 00 Horti “BulunР B C N/A No Yes ur- Business months 0 culture SКnНvТk” LTD
“RoвКl Small 37 334 Horti B C N/A No Yes RosОs” Business months 946.50 culture LLC “ORGA NIK Small 60 1 160 00 Horticu GREEN B C N/A No Yes Business months 0.00 lture FOOD” LLC * Please use a sector listed in the preceding table or any standard classification Note: Env = Environment, IR = displacement, IP = Indigenous Peoples.
D. Environmental and Social Management System (ESMS) 6. Requirements: (1) for existing projects: investment monitoring reports or documents for issuing permits for discharges; and (2) for newly approved projects: the attachment of the approved ZVOS.
Policies and Processes Yes/No Does your organization have Submitted Yes developed and feasible ESMS? If ESMS already there, whether any New procedure was approved on 15.05.2017 additions and changes made to or for ESMS, a copy was submitted. received from your organization's No policies and procedures during the reporting period? Does management signed an updated Management has not signed an updated No policy / procedure? policy Does your organization assigned AbubakirovNuriddin personnel, which tasked with the Head of Risk management division implementation of ESMS? Yes GofurovDoniyor Deputy Head of the Credit division - Head of the Project implementation unit. 4
Provide details of any transactions Several subprojects were rejected according rejected due to environmental and / or Yes to ZVOS category and equipment's Country social problems. of origin Please indicate any difficulties and / or There was not any difficulty regarding to restrictions related to the No implementation of ESMS. implementation of ESMS. It should describe what was confirmed All subprojects which refinanced by ADB that the companies and their projects were screened by following steps: operate in accordance with laws and • in accordance with the list of prohibited regulations and meet the requirements investment activities; Yes of ADB. • according to the list of control questions for environmental screening; • According to the screening list for compliance with ADB's social risk measures Please describe in detail any of the During refinancing subprojects, ESMS materials on the social and managers deeply learned all stages of environmental risks regarding No environmental and social risks and did not customers for the period. find any seriously risks which can influence to environment and social. If the existing ESMS is not fully Existing ESMS approved fully functional functional, which action plans are No approved in your organization? Capabilities Yes/No Please provide the name and contact AbubakirovNuriddin information of the manager or the Head of Risk management division Environmental Protection Tel num: +998712070909 (internal numb Environment Coordinator / social 120) protection, which is the main GofurovDoniyor responsible for the implementation / Deputy Head of the Credit division - Head of Yes the Project implementation unit. Participated trainings: Promoting adaptation and implementation of environmental and social management system for financial intermediaries which held on November 23- 24, 2017 Present staff schedule of the EvОrв montС PJSCB “DAVR BANK” ESMS organization and staff involved in the managers organizes seminars for credit implementation of ESMS. officers in order to give correct perception to Yes initiators of subprojects and implement monitoring while refinancing projects What is a budget for the Budget is not allocated implementation of ESMS during the No year? Monitoring Yes/No Are you getting the environmental and Monitoring manager of the bank fills the act- social monitoring reports from the Yes “TвpТМКl КrОК monТtorТnР Пorm” НurТnР companies whose projects were refinancing for subprojects of ADB. financed? 5
Monitoring manager makes monitoring with access to the site every six month. Are the company projects constantly Every six months, the project is monitored checked for compliance with laws and Yes by monitoring officer. other requirements? Please describe how you are checking With access to the site, monitoring manager the project of the company, social and fills the act- Yes “tвpТМКl КrОК monТtorТnР Пorm” environmental performance of the after refinanced subproject. project. Is the project initiator requested to The subproject initiator requested to get provide verification for compliance Conclusion of State committee for Nature with the required environmental and protection (ZVOS) social agreements and project approvals? Please provide information on any During researching environmental and social incidents / litigation / complaints / legal risks of subprojects there was not any requirements and fines: incident, ligation and complaints. - Cases of non-compliance with applicable environmental and social No protection; Covenants / conditionality imposed by the financial institution on the project of the company as a result of any non- compliance Reporting Yes /No Is there an internal process to inform During the processing of documents, management on the environmental and specialist of the credit department gives a social protection? conclusion on approval of the project for refinancing, as well as on environmental and social checklist screening. After refinancing Yes the project, every six months with the access to the site, the project will be monitored and environmental and social checklist will be completed by the monitoring department manager and the Bank's management will be informed about monitoring results. Do you prepare any reports on social PJSCB “DAVR BANK” НoОs not prОpКrО and environmental protection: any reports on social and environmental - Other multilateral agencies protection to other agencies. No - Other interested parties - Statements of E & S on the report on sustainable development Activity on the list of prohibited investment activities ADB If any, please specify dollar equivalent No 0% of loans in percentage or investments of the total portfolio to customers who, in fact, fall into the list of prohibited investment activities ADB (Page 122 environmental policy). 6
If the percentage is not zero, please No 0% explain these effects and any steps that would be taken to reduce such exposure.
E. Projects category "B" using ADB funds
7. Provide information on all new projects, debt financing by ADB funds approved during the reporting period.
The name of the project company: JV Agrofirm “Bulungur-Sandvik” LTD Location of the project: Republic of Uzbekistan,Samarkand region, Bulungur district, Dustlik street Branch: PJSCB “DAVR BANK” YКkkКsКroв brКnМС The volume of investments (in US $): 1 383 000,00 Protection classification: EnvТronmОnt:“B” InvoluntКrв RОsОttlОmОnt: “C” InНТРОnous pОoplОs:“N/A” Did your organization conducted legal due Yes diligence of environmental and social protection Environmental Screening Checklist and Social Safeguards Screening Checklists were attached Other reports of environmental assessment or Yes audit reports reviewed by your organization Conclusion of State committee for Nature protection (ZVOS) What are the major environmental problems associated with this project, which were identified during the examination carried out in your No organization, how these issues were addressed (ie, the result of expertise)? Did you discuss with initiator of the project applicable requirements for environmental and Yes social protection and their implementation? Does the project suit to the applicable Yes requirements of the legislation of Uzbekistan? Does the project suit to the current protection Yes requirements of the ADB? Were there any documented cases of non- No compliance or requests for corrective action? Were there any complaints or claim on the draft submitted by any injured person or an interested party? No
The name of the project company: “Royal Roses” LLC 7
Location of the project: Tashkent region, Qibray District, Zebiniso street, 26th block, 23rd flat Branch: PJSCB “DAVR BANK” OpОrКtТonКlНТvТsТon (branch) The volume of investments (in US $): 334 946.50 Protection classification: EnvТronmОnt: “B” InvoluntКrв RОsОttlОmОnt: “C” InНТРОnous pОoplОs: “N/A” Did your organization conducted legal due Yes diligence of environmental and social protection Yes Environmental Screening Checklist and Social Safeguards Screening Checklists were attached Other reports of environmental assessment or Yes audit reports reviewed by your organization Conclusion of State committee for Nature protection (ZVOS) What are the major environmental problems associated with this project, which were identified during the examination carried out in your No organization, how these issues were addressed (ie, the result of expertise)? Did you discuss with initiator of the project applicable requirements for environmental and Yes social protection and their implementation? Does the project suit to the applicable Yes requirements of the legislation of Uzbekistan? Does the project suit to the current protection Yes requirements of the ADB? Were there any documented cases of non- No compliance or requests for corrective action? Were there any complaints or claim on the draft submitted by any injured person or an interested No party?
The name of the project company: “Organik Green Food” LLC Location of the project: Tashkent region, Baytqurgan District, Navbahor street, 26th block, 23rd flat Branch: PJSCB “DAVR BANK” UМСtОpК BrКnМС
The volume of investments (in US $): 1 160 000.00 Protection classification: EnvТronmОnt: “B” InvoluntКrв RОsОttlОmОnt: “C” InНТРОnous pОoplОs: “N/A” 8
Did your organization conducted legal due Yes diligence of environmental and social protection Yes Environmental Screening Checklist and Social Safeguards Screening Checklists were attached Other reports of environmental assessment or Yes audit reports reviewed by your organization Conclusion of State committee for Nature protection (ZVOS) What are the major environmental problems associated with this project, which were identified during the examination carried out in your No organization, how these issues were addressed (ie, the result of expertise)? Did you discuss with initiator of the project applicable requirements for environmental and Yes social protection and their implementation? Does the project suit to the applicable Yes requirements of the legislation of Uzbekistan? Does the project suit to the current protection Yes requirements of the ADB? Were there any documented cases of non- No compliance or requests for corrective action? Were there any complaints or claim on the draft submitted by any injured person or an interested No party?
HORTICULTURE:
PFI’s ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
(To be submitted by PFIs to RRA)
1.
Name of the Financial Institution JSICB “IpКk YulТ”
Completed by (name): D.Nurmukhamedova
Position in organization: ESMS CoorНТnКtor oП JSICB “IpКk YulТ” Date: 04.01.2019
A. Portfolio Information
Report Covering Period: 1 year
From: 01.01.2018 To: 31.12.2018
2. Information about loan portfolio of the Bank for the reporting period:
B. Business Lines
Product line Description Total exposure Average loan outstanding for (or transaction) most recent size (US$) FY end
(US$)
Microfinance Loans or other financial products for 33 408 614 6 757 individuals with individual transactions less than $50,000
Small Loans or other financial products for 7 949 087 66 799 business individuals with individual transactions less than $300,000
Long term: Transactions with tenor greater than 12 months
Microfinance Any lending, leasing or other financial 28 706 672 8 811 assistance to any corporate or legal entity
1
other than an individual, with individual transactions less than $50,000
Any lending, leasing or other financial 54 189 513 95 911 assistance to any corporate or legal entity Small other than an individual, with individual business transactions less than $300,000
Other
Other (if Shor-term transactions with corporate 28 671 709 101 313 applicable) clients (tenor less than 12 monts)
and long-term transaction (tenor greater than 12 months) with corporate clients of 122 346 045 668 558 more than $300,000.
C. Exposure by Horticulture Sectors
3.1 Indicative percentage of industrial sectors for the project financed under ADB Loan 3471-UZB: Horticulture Value Chain Development Project:
Industrial Sector % Horticulture Value Chain Develoment Project Portfolio
Intensive garden 27%
Modern greenhouse complex 54%
Regrigirated store 13%
Equipment for processing of agriculture products 6%
{Note: Please attach environmental and social audit or due diligence reports and environmental and social monitoring reports for each Project Company, if available}
3.2 Indicative percentage of industrial sectors for the project financed under ADB Loan 3673(COL)-UZB: Horticulture Value Chain Development Project:
2
Industrial Sector % Horticulture Value Chain Develoment Project Portfolio
Modern greenhouse complex 100%
4 Information on all loans with: (i) tenor longer than 12 months; and (ii) maximum $5,000,000 loan size:
Any outstanding environmental and IR and IP issues during reporting period and actions taken to address the issues – For all projects there are not outstanding environmental and IR and IP issues. Please see attachment 1.
*Please use the sectors listed in the earlier table or any standard classification. Note: Env = Environment, IR = Involuntary Resettlement, IP = Indigenous Peoples.
D. Environmental and Social Management System (ESMS)
5 REQUIREMENT: (1) FOR EXISTING SUBPROJECTS: ATTACHMENTS OF MONITORING REPORTS OR REPORT ON DISCHARGE PERMITS; AND
(2) FOR NEWLY APPROVED SUBPROJECTS: ATTACHMENTS OF ZVOS APPROVAL. Policies & Processes Yes/No Has your organization developed and On April 15th, 2013, the Bank's implemented an ESMS? Supervisory Council approved the RОРulКtТon “On tСО ОnvТronmОntКl КnН soМТКl rТsk mКnКРОmОnt sвstОm” oП tСО JSICB "Ipak Yuli". On September 13th, 2016, the Supervisory Council of the Bank КpprovОН tСО PolТМв “On tСО environmental and social risks management of JSICB "Ipak Yuli". According to the above-mentioned documents, all projects considered by the bank for financing must comply with the requirements of ESMS. In connection with the implementation of the ADB project 3471-UZB: Horticulture Value Chain Development, the Management Board of JSICB "Ipak Yuli" approved the ESMS Procedures for implementation of the above Project on 24th May 24, 2017. Copies are attached. If there is an ESMS already in place, have there As mentioned in the above paragraph, been any updates to the ESMS or policy and the Bank has implemented ESMS since procedures adopted by your organization April 15th, 2013. during the reporting period? During the reported period with consideration of the pecularities of the
3
ADB project 3471-UZB: Horticulture Value Chain Development, ESMS procuderes were adopted for implementation of this particular project. Has senior management signed off on the As indicated in the paragraphs above, the updated policy/procedure? internal documents of the bank on ESMS were approved by the Supervisory Board and the Management Board of the Bank.
Has your organization appointed staff tasked In order to implement the ESMS the to implement the ESMS? ESMS Coordinator was appointed in the Bank's head office. In the branch offices, the heads of lending departments are appointed as regional ESMS managers. Also all employees of the Bank's lending divisons are involved in the implementation of ESMS. Loan officers apply procedures for managing environmental and social risks when considering every project financed by the Bank. They ensure compliance with protective measures for environmental and social issues, and if required, ensure the availability of environmental documents for each decision on granting a loan. Moreover, the staff of the Loan Portfolio Monitoring department carry out monitoring on the fulfillment of the ESMS obligations by the borrower after granting loan. All the above-mentioned staff is trained and have knowledge about ESMS procedures of the Bank. Please give details of any transactions rejected Some examples from the BКnk’s practice due to environmental and/or social concerns. when the Bank rejected transactions due to environmental and / or social concerns: -ClТОnt’s КМtТvТtв ТnМluНОН sКlО oП КlМoСol; -The client brought a contract for the purchase of slate, but could not provide information about percent of asbestos contained in the slate; - B category was assigned to the project, however the client did not bring the required documents (state expertise conclusion, etc.);
4
- the client applied for funding the project of a Poultry farm with more than 40 thousand hens. Please state any difficulties and/or constraints Sometimes there are difficulties in related to the implementation of the ESMS. determining which category of environmental risk the project belongs to. Please describe how you ensure that your Financing of projects by the bank subproject companies and their subprojects are (project evaluation, financing and operated in compliance with the national laws monitoring) is carried out in accordance КnН rОРulКtТons КnН КpplТМКblО ADB’s with the procedure stipulated in the requirements. "ESMS procedures for ADB Loan 3471- UZB: Horticulture Value Chain Development Project", the implementation of which ensures that the subproject complies with national laws and regulations, and the requirements of ADB. During monitoring it is checked that the borrower meets the ESMS requirements in accordance with the national standards and the requirements of ADB. In addition, according to the local legislation the divisions of the State Committee on Ecology and Environmental Protection monitor compliance with the requirements stated in the State Expert Examination Conclusion by enterprises. Please give details of any material social and n/a environmental issues associated with clients during the reporting period.
In case the existing ESMS is not fully The existing ESMS is fully functional. functional, what is the action plan being implemented by your organization?
Capacity Yes/No Please provide the name and contact ESMS Coordinator – Dinara information of the Environmental/Social Nurmukhamedova Officer or Coordinator who has the overall Tel. No. +998 (71) 140-69-43 responsibility for the implementation of the Email: ESMS. [email protected]
Dinara Nurmukhamedova is ESMS coordinator of the Bank. D.Nurmuhamedova graduated from the
5
International Law Faculty of the University of World Economy and Diplomacy (Bachelor). She received LLM degree from Kyushu University (Japan). She also graduated from the Tashkent Finance Institute (bachelor degree in accounting and audit). She has been working in the banking sector since 2004 and has experience of working in the legal department, loan department and risk management department of the bank. She received training and was granted a certificate at the ADB seminar on the implementation of the environmental and social management system for financial intermediaries in Uzbekistan (2017). She also undertook training in the Training Center of State Committee for Ecology and Environmental protection - 72 hours course on environmental management in accordance with national standards (Certificate dated 16 February 2018); - Seminar by ADB consultant Irakli Kavidadze (17 February 2018); - Seminar of the Agency for Restructuring Rural enterprises on environmental management for commercial banks (Certificate, February 26, 2018) and other short term seminars (trainings).
Please provide current staffing of other core D.Nurmuhamedova – ESMS coordinator ESMS persons in the organization involved with ESMS implementation. Sh.Mamatov – Head of Investment Monitoring and Coordination Division.
S.Mamarasulov – senior specialist of credit risk department
What was the budget allocated to the ESMS Salaries of employees involved in the and its implementation during the year? implementation of ESMS. Other costs
6
are payable as required (costs connected with organization of seminars in the Center of State Committee for Ecology and Environmental protection for 20 bank specialists, costs connected with organisation of seminar for 60 bank specialists from all branch offices on February 17th, 2018 (business trip expenditures and other costs). Monitoring Yes/No Do you receive environmental and social After financing of the project, monitoring reports from subproject companies environmental and social issues are that you finance? monitored in accordance with the Annex 6 of the ESMS Procedures for the ADB Loan 3471-Uzb "Horticulture Value Chain Development Project". Monitoring is carried out according to the provided list of questions. Also, the Bank's monitoring officer checks the implementation of the Environmental Management Plan of the project.
Do you check for ongoing compliance of your When completing Annex 5 (Analysis of subproject companies with national regulation the environmental impact of the project and any other requirements? and the preparation of the Environmental Management Plan), the requirements for mitigation measures prescribed in the Conclusion of the State Committee on Ecological and Environmental Protection are considered. When monitoring is carried out, implementation of the activities envisaged in the environmental management plan is verified, thus implementation of the national rules and ADB’s stКnНКrНs Тs checked. Also, according to the local legislation, the divisions of the State Committee on Ecology and Environmental Protection carriy out monitoring on implementation of the requirements, envisioned in the Conclusion of the State Committee on Ecology and Environmental Protection by enterprese. Please describe how you monitor the Under the ADB loan 3471-UZB: subproУОМt МompКnв КnН tСОТr subproУОМt’s Horticulture Value Chain Development social and environmental performance. Project the Bank financed 9 projects.
7
The equipment of all projects has already arrived and projects were launched. The Bank conducted environmental and social monitoring for all financed projects (Acts of monitoring are attached).
Under the ADB loan 3673(COL)-UZB: Horticulture Value Chain Development Project the Bank apporved 1 project for the amount of 1,5 million USD in December 2018 year. The purpose of the project is purchasing materials, equipment for construction of green house.
As soon as financing was made for the sub-projects, the loan files were transferred from the Credit operations department to the Loan Monitoring Department. After familirization with environmental and social protection documents the monitoring specialist during sight visit filled annex 6 (Act of Monitoring of environmental and social impact of the subproject). The monitoring specialist also check implementation of environmental management plan.
The frequency of monitoring is in the course of usual monitoring which is usually not less than once every 6 months for B category projects.
Do you require the subproject owner to submit The Environmental Management Plan is to you evidence of compliance with required completed in accordance with Annex 5 environmental and social approvals and of the ESMS Procedures for ADB Loan permits for the subprojects. 3471-UZB: Horticulture Value Chain Development Project. It takes into account the impacts identified in ZVOS report and mitigation measures prescribed in the Conclusion of the State Committee on Ecology and Environmental Protection.
The monitoring officer at the site visit is required to verify the implementation of
8
the mitigation measures specified in the environmental management plan.
Please provide details of any accidents/ No No litigation/complaints/regulatory notices and fines:
- Any incidents of non-compliance with the applicable Environmental and Social Requirements
- Covenants/conditionalities imposed
by the Financial Institution to the subproject company as a result of any non-compliance
Reporting Yes/No Is there an internal process to report on social According to the adopted procedure, and environmental issues to senior based on the results of the monitoring, if management? the borrower fails to meet the requirements for compliance with environmental protection measures, the monitoring specialist must notify the ESMS Coordinator for taking appropriate measures.
The ESMS Coordinator should provide timely reports on the implementation of ESMS policies and procedures to the Management Board and interested parties of the Bank.
Do you prepare any social and environmental Yes, prepared for Netherlands reports: Development Finance Company (FMO) - For other multilateral agencies
- Other stakeholders
- E&S reporting in the Report
Sustainability reports
Activities on ADB’s Prohibited Investment Activities List If any, please indicate the dollar percentage of loans or investments out of your total 0% outstanding exposure provided to clients who КrО substКntТКllв ТnvolvОН Тn ADB’s ProСТbТtОН Investment Activities List (Refer to page 122 of SPS).
9
If the percentage is not zero, please explain these exposures and any steps that have been taken to reduce such exposure.
E. Category “B” Subprojects Using ADB Funds
Information about all new subprojects using ADB loan funding approved during this reporting period (Under the ADB loan 3673(COL)-UZB: Horticulture Value Chain Development Project
Name of Subproject Company: "HOJI GADOYBOY OTA" PE
(subproject is financed in December 2018y)
Subproject location: Syrdarya region, Yangiyer, Shodlik
Horticulture sector: The organization of the greenhouse complex
Value of exposure (US$ ): 1,500,000.00 US Dollars
Was any environmental and social due Yes, in particular, there were carried out analysis of diligence undertaken by your organization? environmental impact (ecological screening), as well as social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits had been conducted by credit expert.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. Draft of ZVOS (statement of environmental reports reviewed by your organization? impact) and positive Conclusion of State ecological expertise dated 15.03.2018 No.10/234 were inspected by the loan specialist. According to the mentioned Conclusion, the project is given 4th category of environmental impact.
ADB environmental category B/social category (environmental resettlement) C.
What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State Ecological associated with this subproject that were Expertise, this project falls under the category 4 based identified through due diligence conducted by on the resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republi 5/06/2009. your organization, and how were the issues М oП UгbОkТstКn №152 НКtОН The total area of the object will be to 32.0 ha. From the dealt with (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? bottom of 30.0 ha of the area under the greenhouse of 1.5 ha of roads and other land, 0.5 hectares - an administrative building. Impact on water: Water supply of the object will be carried out by water from an artesian well or brought by tap water. Water consumption for household and drinking needs of workers will be 428,625 m3 / year. Water consumption for washing floors 912,5 m3 /
10
year, irrigation of the territory with a ground surface- 1,350 million m3/year, watering of the territory under hard surfaces - 2737,5 m3 / year. Irretrievable water consumption, effluents are not formed. Waste: In the course of business activity of the site, the following waste can be generated: burnt fluorescent lamps - 0.001362 tons/year, municipal waste-2.5 tons/year, and waste from cleaning the territory - 1765.0 tons/year.
The following ecological requirements must be fulfilled:
- Take measures for safeguarding trees, growing at the site during construction work; - Community waste must be temporary stored in containers and after it taken to local waste site; - It is forbidden to discharge sewage water into natural open water bodies, burn waste on the territory of the site, water green plants with drinking water.
Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank inspectors carefully discussed with the applicable environmental and social safeguard subproject owner all the requirements regarding the requirements and their implementation? environmental and social safeguard that he/she should meet during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it does, as witnessed by the positive Conclusion government requirements? of State Ecological Expertise.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, as the results of preliminary analyzes shows, ADB safeguard requirements? screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of No, there were no incidents of non-compliance non-compliance or requests for corrective observed. actions?
Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints received. lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Information about new subproject using ADB loan funding approved during this reporting period (Under the ADB loan 3471-UZB: Horticulture Value Chain Development Project
11
Name of Subproject Company: "JAXON IDEAL SERVICE" LLC
Subproject location: Syrdarya region, Yangiyer, Shodlik
Horticulture sector: The organization of the greenhouse complex
Value of exposure (US$ ): 200,000.00 US Dollars
Was any environmental and social due Yes, in particular, there were carried out analysis of diligence undertaken by your organization? environmental impact (ecological screening), as well as social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits had been conducted by credit expert.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. Draft of ZVOS (statement of environmental reports reviewed by your organization? impact) and positive Conclusion of State ecological expertise dated 17.05.2017 No.05/2-863 were inspected by the loan specialist and ESMS coordinator. According to the mentioned Conclusion, the project is given 4th category of environmental impact.
ADB environmental category B/social category (environmental resettlement) C.
What were the main environmental issues The area of the site: The enterprise is 0,8927 hectares, associated with this subproject that were currently on site the existing greenhouse (3040 m2), identified through due diligence conducted by administrative buildings (411.36 m2), main building (20.70 m2), rest room (7.50 m2), a new greenhouse is your organization, and how were the issues to be constructed to the land (5000 m2). dealt with (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Impact on water: Water supply of the object will be carried out by water from an artesian well or brought by tap water. Water consumption for household and drinking needs of workers will be 41,25 m3/year. Irrigation of the territory with a ground surface-15,919 thousand m3/year. Irretrievable water consumption, effluents are not formed. According to the project, on activity of the site household drowning is 0,125 m3 per day and will be discharged to local sewerage network. Waste: In the course of business activity of the site, household waste (0,25 t/year) and greenhouse cultivation (48,24 t/year) will be generated. They will be thrown to special container and taken to local disposal facility.
Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank inspectors carefully discussed with the applicable environmental and social safeguard subproject owner all the requirements regarding the requirements and their implementation? environmental and social safeguard that he/she should meet during the implementation of project.
12
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it does, as witnessed by the positive Conclusion government requirements? of State Ecological Expertise.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, as the results of preliminary analyzes shows, ADB safeguard requirements? screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of No, there were no incidents of non-compliance non-compliance or requests for corrective observed. actions?
Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints received. lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
13 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
(To be submitted by the Bank to RRA)
1. Please provide responses to the questions below. Please include additional sheets or attachments as required to provide details on questions that have been answered Yes. The Bank is required to submit the annual performance report to RRA.
Name of the Financial JSCMB “Ipoteka bank” Institution
Completed by (name): Boltaev Sherzod
Position in Head of Divison Date: 31.12.2017 organization:
A. Portfolio Information
Report Covering Period:
From: 01.01.2018 To: 31.12.2018
2. For the reporting period, please provide the following information about your portfolio where applicable:
B. Business Lines
Product Description Total exposure Average loan line outstanding for (or transaction) most recent FY end size (US$) (US$)
Microfinance Loans or other financial products 206 450 7 450 for individuals
Small Loans or other financial products 25 039 750 8 921 business for individuals
Long term: Transactions with tenor greater than 12 months
Microfinance Any lending, leasing or other 58 425 771 9500 financial assistance to any corporate or legal entity other than an individual, with individual transactions less than $50,000
Any lending, leasing or other 574 991 698.8 851 839 Small financial assistance to any business corporate or legal entity other than an individual, with individual transactions less than $300,000
Other
Other (if Please describe 894 486 040 2 541 150 applicable)
C. Exposure by Horticulture Sectors
3. Please provide an indicative percentage of total Innovation to horticulture modernization loan portfolio per subcomponents:
Industrial Sector % Horticulture Value Chain Develoment Project Portfolio
Intensive garden 9% Modern greenhouse complex 35% Regrigirated store 34% Equipment for processing of agriculture products 22%
{Note: Please attach environmental and social audit or due diligence reports and environmental and social monitoring reports for each Project Company, if available}
4. If engaged in long-term small business finance, please provide information on all loans with: (i) tenor longer than 12 months; and (ii) maximum $5 000,000 loan size.
Safeguard category Any outstanding Type of Subpro- Value environmental and loan Tenor ject using of IR and IP issues SME/ of loan ADB Name of Subpro-ject exposu Industry Sector* during reporting trade (month funds re period and actions finance s) Env IR IP (US$) taken to address ) (yes/no) the issues
JV "Nisi Multifruits credit 60 667 Agricultural B C N/A Yes No Trade" processing "Dilrabo-94" LLC credit 60 156,2 cold storages B C N/A No Yes "Jamshid Javohir credit 60 450 greenhouse B C N/A Yes Agrotexservis" LLC No «NAVOIВAGRO» LLC credit 84 1500 greenhouse B C N/A Yes No "Suvon Omonturdi" PE credit 60 200 cold storages B C N/A Yes No
credit 60 250 cold storages B C N/A Yes "Фар в ер No Ч рва" LLC "Dil shams qamar" LLC credit 60 265,9 Dryer fruits and B C N/A Yes vegetables No «Ozodbek -ServТs» LLC credit 60 390 Greenhouse B C N/A Yes No
"Marokand agro invest" credit 84 992,6 Garden B C N/A Yes Farming No "Pastdarg'om Erkin credit 60 1000 Greenhouse B C N/A Yes Sabzavotlari" Farming no "Platina Parnik Servis" credit 60 500 Greenhouse B C N/A Yes LLC no "TASHKENT TRUST credit 48 250 cold storages B C N/A Yes TRADE" LLC no "Qiziriq ximiyaviy ugit" credit 60 244,7 cold storages B C N/A Yes LLC no «PERFECT credit 60 1090,8 Greenhouse and B C N/A Yes LOGISTICS» LLC cold storages no «MТller Grand KapТtal» credit 60 948,5 Production of B C N/A Yes PE beverages no “RavsСan ВodТk credit 60 500,3 Manufacture B C N/A Yes ProductТon” LLC carton boxes for no fruits «MТrzaСamdeov credit 60 250 cold storages B C N/A Yes RavsСan» PE no "Turkiston Mirishkorlari" credit 60 376,8 cold storages B C N/A Yes LLC no "Yogdu Fayz credit 60 798,5 cold storages B C N/A Yes bogdorchilik" Farming no “FayzlТ Ummon" LLC credit 60 168,7 cold storages B C N/A no Yes
*Please use the sectors listed in the earlier table or any standard classification. Note: Env = Environment, IR = Involuntary Resettlement, IP = Indigenous Peoples.
D. Environmental and Social Management System (ESMS)
5. REQUIREMENT: (1) FOR EXISTING SUBPROJECTS: ATTACHMENTS OF MONITORING REPORTS OR REPORT ON DISCHARGE PERMITS; AND (2) FOR NEWLY APPROVED SUBPROJECTS: ATTACHMENTS OF ZVOS APPROVAL. Policies & Processes Yes/No Has your organization developed and Yes In connection with the implemented an ESMS? implementation of the ADB project 3471-UZB: Horticulture Value Chain Development, the Management Board of JSCMB "Ipotekabank" approved the ESMS Procedures for implementation of the above Project on 24th May 24, 2017. Copies in Russian and English are attached. If there is an ESMS already in place, No have there been any updates to the ESMS or policy and procedures adopted by your organization during the reporting period?
Has senior management signed off on Yes As indicated in the paragraphs the updated policy/procedure? above, the internal documents of the bank on ESMS were approved by the Supervisory Board and the Management Board of the Bank. Has your organization appointed staff Yes The Bank appointed Mr.Sherzod tasked to implement the ESMS? Boltaev tasked to implement the ESMS. As well there are responsible for implementation ESMS from in every branch is head of credit divisions. (High education). Please give details of any transactions Before financing project, specialist rejected due to environmental and/or of ESMS ll check eligibility for social concerns. project for category for requirements of ADB. For example we rejected to finance: - not relating holticulture sphere like livestock projects. Our client wants to organize cold storages for beef, chicken and frozen fishes. Cant prove to storage only fruits and vegetables. - To buy transports. We checked that he is going to use this kind of transport only for livestock business. - To produce beer from wheet. Please state any difficulties and/or Sometimes there are some constraints related to the implementation misunderstandings and difficulties to of the ESMS. categorize some sub projects in requirement ADB. Please describe how you ensure that Every sub projects should accord your subproject companies and their natioanal laws and norms, as well subprojects are operated in compliance requirements ADB. with the national laws and regulations and applТcable ADB’s requТrements.
Please give details of any material social No There are no questions during and environmental issues associated with period of report. clients during the reporting period.
In case the existing ESMS is not fully Current ESMS is functional functional, what is the action plan being implemented by your organization?
Capacity Yes/No Please provide the name and contact Sherzod Boltaev, Head of information of the Environmental/Social Department, Officer or Coordinator who has the overall [email protected] responsibility for the implementation of the ESMS.
Please provide current staffing of other Yes State committee on Ecology and core ESMS persons in the organization environmental protection. State involved with ESMS implementation. sanitary epidemiology service of the Republic of Uzbekistan. What was the budget allocated to the At the expense of salary. If there is ESMS and its implementation during the any business trips on regarding year? ESMS, bank ll pay for this expenses.
Monitoring Yes/No Do you receive environmental and social Yes After financing subprojects, there monitoring reports from subproject will be done monitoring ecology companies that you finance? and social questions according to appendix 6, Procedures on Environmental and Social Management for “HortТculture Value CСaТn Development” project financed by Asian Development Bank. Beside of this, staff will check requirements of ADB. Do you check for ongoing compliance of Yes In process monitoring, checking your subproject companies with national whether doing national law norms regulation and any other requirements? and requirements ADB.
Please describe how you monitor the The sub-project coordinator subproject company and their monitors the site visits and on the subproject’s socТal and envТronmental basis of the supporting documents, performance. monitoring is carried out, the sub- project initiator fulfills all the obligations to implement the current requirements for environmental protection measures prescribed in the EIS and in the conclusion of the state environmental review.
Do you require the subproject owner to Yes The initiator of the subproject submit to you evidence of compliance submits to the ESMS Coordinator with required environmental and social the supporting documents for approvals and permits for the compliance with the necessary subprojects. environmental and social approving documents and permits, on the basis of which the ESMS coordinator monitors and provides the ESMS Manager for further reporting on ESMS.
Please provide details of any accidents/ No There is no any notices and fines. litigation/complaints/regulatory notices and fines:
- Any incidents of non-compliance with the applicable Environmental and Social Requirements - Covenants/conditionalities imposed by the Financial Institution to the subproject company as a result of any non-compliance
Reporting Yes/No Is there an internal process to report on Yes Credit and environmental policies social and environmental issues to senior have been approved. Based on the management? policy during the quarterly monitoring of credit lines, environmental monitoring is also conducted. All project monitoring reports are submitted to the bank branch manager.
Do you prepare any social and No environmental reports: - For other multilateral agencies - Other stakeholders - E&S reporting in the Report Sustainability reports
Activities on ADB’s Prohibited Investment Activities List If any, please indicate the dollar percentage of loans or investments out of your total outstanding exposure provided to clients who are substantially 0% Тnvolved Тn ADB’s ProСТbТted Investment ActТvТtТes LТst (Refer to page 122 of SPS).
If the percentage is not zero, please explain these exposures and any steps that have been taken to reduce such exposure.
E. Category “B” Subprojects Using ADB Funds
6. Please provide information about all new subprojects using ADB loan funding approved during this reporting period.
Name of Subproject Company: JV "Nisi Multifruits Trade" Subproject location: Samarkand region Horticulture sector: Agricultural processing Value of exposure (US$ ): 667 000 Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, there were carried out analysis undertaken by your organization? of environmental impact (ecological screening), as well as social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits had been conducted by credit expert of branch.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. Copy of ZVOS (statement of reports reviewed by your organization? environmental impact) and positive Conclusion of State ecological expertise were inspected by the loan specialist and ESMS coordinator. According to the mentioned Conclusion, the project is given 4th category of environmental impact. ADB environmental category B/social category (environmental resettlement) C. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State associated with this subproject that were identified Ecological Expertise, this project falls through due diligence conducted by your under the category 4 based on the organization, and how were the issues dealt with resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? of tСe RepublТc of UzbekТstan №152 dated 5/06/2009.
Impact on water: Water supply of the object will be carried out by water from brought by Suvsoz, distributor of drinking water. Water consumption for household and drinking needs of workers will be 200, m3 / year. Water consumption for washing floors 100,0 m3 / year, irrigation of the territory with a ground surface-200, m3/year. Irretrievable water consumption, effluents are not formed.
Waste: In the course of business activity of the site, the following waste can be generated: municipal waste- 2.5 tons/year, and waste from cleaning the territory - 15.0 tons/year.
The following ecological requirements must be fulfilled:
- Take measures for safeguarding trees, growing at the site during construction work; - Community waste must be temporary stored in containers and after it taken to local waste site; - Control keeping wasting water under sanitary norm.
It is forbidden to discharge sewage water into natural open water bodies, burn waste on the territory of the site, water green plants with drinking water. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank inspectors carefully applicable environmental and social safeguard discussed with the subproject owner requirements and their implementation? all the requirements regarding the environmental, ecological and social safeguard that he/she should meet during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it does, as witnessed by the government requirements? positive Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Additionally staff of ecological committee ll be check requirements of ecology at least once a year.
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, as the results of analyzes safeguard requirements? shows, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there have not been any compliance or requests for corrective actions? recorded incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, there have not been any lodged on the subproject by any affected person or grievances or complaints lodged on concerned stakeholder? the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder.
Name of Subproject Company: "Dilrabo-94" LLC
Subproject location: Andijan region
Horticulture sector: cold storages
Value of exposure (US$ ): 156 200
Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, there were carried out analysis undertaken by your organization? of environmental impact (ecological screening), as well as social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits had been conducted by credit expert of branch.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. Copy of ZVOS (statement of reports reviewed by your organization? environmental impact) and positive Conclusion of State ecological expertise were inspected by the loan specialist and ESMS coordinator. According to the mentioned Conclusion, the project is given 4th category of environmental impact.
ADB environmental category B/social category (environmental resettlement) C. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State associated with this subproject that were identified Ecological Expertise, this project falls through due diligence conducted by your under the category 4 based on the organization, and how were the issues dealt with resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? of tСe RepublТc of UzbekТstan №152 dated 5/06/2009.
Impact on water: Water supply of the object will be carried out by water from brought artesian well. Water consumption for household and drinking needs of workers will be 180, m3 / year. Water consumption for washing floors 10,0 m3 / year, washing fruits and vegetables-40 m3 , irrigation of the territory with a ground surface-100, m3/year. Irretrievable water consumption, effluents are not formed.
Waste: In the course of business activity of the site, the following waste can be generated: municipal waste- 1.0 tons/year, and waste from cleaning the territory - 10.0 tons/year.
The following ecological requirements must be fulfilled:
- Take measures for safeguarding trees, growing at the site during construction work; - Community waste must be temporary stored in containers and after it taken to local waste site; - To control use and fulfil freon in cold fridge.
It is forbidden to discharge sewage water into natural open water bodies, burn waste on the territory of the site, water green plants with drinking water. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank inspectors carefully applicable environmental and social safeguard discussed with the subproject owner requirements and their implementation? all the requirements regarding the environmental, ecological and social safeguard that he/she should meet during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it does, as witnessed by the government requirements? positive Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Additionally staff of ecological committee ll be check requirements of ecology at least once a year.
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, as the results of analyzes safeguard requirements? shows, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there have not been any compliance or requests for corrective actions? recorded incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, there have not been any lodged on the subproject by any affected person or grievances or complaints lodged on concerned stakeholder? the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder.
Name of Subproject Company: "Jamshid Javohir Agrotexservis" LLC
Subproject location: Bukhara region
Horticulture sector: Green house for 1 ha
Value of exposure (US$ ): 450.0
Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, there were carried out analysis undertaken by your organization? of environmental impact (ecological screening), as well as social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits had been conducted by credit expert of branch.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. Copy of ZVOS (statement of reports reviewed by your organization? environmental impact) and positive Conclusion of State ecological expertise were inspected by the loan specialist and ESMS coordinator. According to the mentioned Conclusion, the project is given 4th category of environmental impact.
ADB environmental category B/social category (environmental resettlement) C. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State associated with this subproject that were identified Ecological Expertise, this project falls through due diligence conducted by your under the category 4 based on the organization, and how were the issues dealt with resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? of tСe RepublТc of UzbekТstan №152 dated 5/06/2009.
Impact on water: Water supply of the object will be carried out by water from brought artesian well. Water consumption for household and drinking needs of workers will be 200, m3 / year. Water consumption for washing floors 100,0 m3 / year, irrigation of the territory with a ground surface-2000, m3/year. Irretrievable water consumption, effluents are not formed.
Waste: In the course of business activity of the site, the following waste can be generated: municipal waste- 2.5 tons/year, and waste from cleaning the territory - 15.0 tons/year.
The following ecological requirements must be fulfilled:
- Take measures for safeguarding trees, growing at the site during construction work; - Community waste must be temporary stored in containers and after it taken to local waste site;
It is forbidden to discharge sewage water into natural open water bodies, burn waste on the territory of the site, water green plants with drinking water. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank inspectors carefully applicable environmental and social safeguard discussed with the subproject owner requirements and their implementation? all the requirements regarding the environmental, ecological and social safeguard that he/she should meet during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it does, as witnessed by the government requirements? positive Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Additionally staff of ecological committee ll be check requirements of ecology at least once a year.
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, as the results of analyzes safeguard requirements? shows, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there have not been any compliance or requests for corrective actions? recorded incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, there have not been any lodged on the subproject by any affected person or grievances or complaints lodged on concerned stakeholder? the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder.
Name of Subproject Company: «NAVOIВAGRO» LLC
Subproject location: Navaiy region
Horticulture sector: Greenhouse
Value of exposure (US$ ): 1500.0
Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, there were carried out analysis undertaken by your organization? of environmental impact (ecological screening), as well as social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits had been conducted by credit expert of branch.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. Copy of ZVOS (statement of reports reviewed by your organization? environmental impact) and positive Conclusion of State ecological expertise were inspected by the loan specialist and ESMS coordinator. According to the mentioned Conclusion, the project is given 4th category of environmental impact.
ADB environmental category B/social category (environmental resettlement) C. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State associated with this subproject that were identified Ecological Expertise, this project falls through due diligence conducted by your under the category 4 based on the organization, and how were the issues dealt with resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? of tСe RepublТc of UzbekТstan №152 dated 5/06/2009. Impact on water: Water supply of the object will be carried out by water from brought artesian well. Water consumption for household and drinking needs of workers will be 200, m3 / year. Water consumption for washing floors 100,0 m3 / year, irrigation of the territory with a ground surface-2000, m3/year. Irretrievable water consumption, effluents are not formed.
Waste: In the course of business activity of the site, the following waste can be generated: municipal waste- 2.5 tons/year, and waste from cleaning the territory - 15.0 tons/year.
The following ecological requirements must be fulfilled:
- Take measures for safeguarding trees, growing at the site during construction work; - Community waste must be temporary stored in containers and after it taken to local waste site;
It is forbidden to discharge sewage water into natural open water bodies, burn waste on the territory of the site, water green plants with drinking water. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank inspectors carefully applicable environmental and social safeguard discussed with the subproject owner requirements and their implementation? all the requirements regarding the environmental, ecological and social safeguard that he/she should meet during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it does, as witnessed by the government requirements? positive Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Additionally staff of ecological committee ll be check requirements of ecology at least once a year.
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, as the results of analyzes safeguard requirements? shows, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there have not been any compliance or requests for corrective actions? recorded incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, there have not been any lodged on the subproject by any affected person or grievances or complaints lodged on concerned stakeholder? the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder.
Name of Subproject Company: "Suvon Omonturdi" PE
Subproject location: Surkhandarya region
Horticulture sector: cold storages
Value of exposure (US$ ): 200.0
Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, there were carried out analysis undertaken by your organization? of environmental impact (ecological screening), as well as social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits had been conducted by credit expert of branch.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. Copy of ZVOS (statement of reports reviewed by your organization? environmental impact) and positive Conclusion of State ecological expertise were inspected by the loan specialist and ESMS coordinator. According to the mentioned Conclusion, the project is given 4th category of environmental impact.
ADB environmental category B/social category (environmental resettlement) C. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State associated with this subproject that were identified Ecological Expertise, this project falls through due diligence conducted by your under the category 4 based on the organization, and how were the issues dealt with resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? of tСe RepublТc of UzbekТstan №152 dated 5/06/2009.
Impact on water: Water supply of the object will be carried out by water from brought artesian well. Water consumption for household and drinking needs of workers will be 200, m3 / year. Water consumption for washing floors 100,0 m3 / year, irrigation of the territory with a ground surface-2000, m3/year. Irretrievable water consumption, effluents are not formed.
Waste: In the course of business activity of the site, the following waste can be generated: municipal waste- 2.5 tons/year, and waste from cleaning the territory - 15.0 tons/year.
The following ecological requirements must be fulfilled:
- Take measures for safeguarding trees, growing at the site during construction work; - Community waste must be temporary stored in containers and after it taken to local waste site; - To control use and fulfil freon in cold fridge.
It is forbidden to discharge sewage water into natural open water bodies, burn waste on the territory of the site, water green plants with drinking water. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank inspectors carefully applicable environmental and social safeguard discussed with the subproject owner requirements and their implementation? all the requirements regarding the environmental, ecological and social safeguard that he/she should meet during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it does, as witnessed by the government requirements? positive Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Additionally staff of ecological committee ll be check requirements of ecology at least once a year.
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, as the results of analyzes safeguard requirements? shows, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there have not been any recorded incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? or requests for corrective actions.
Have there been any grievances or complaints No, there have not been any lodged on the subproject by any affected person or grievances or complaints lodged on concerned stakeholder? the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder.
Name of Subproject Company: "Faravon Termiz Chorva" LLC
Subproject location: Surkhandarya region
Horticulture sector: cold storages
Value of exposure (US$ ): 250.0
Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, there were carried out analysis undertaken by your organization? of environmental impact (ecological screening), as well as social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits had been conducted by credit expert of branch.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. Copy of ZVOS (statement of reports reviewed by your organization? environmental impact) and positive Conclusion of State ecological expertise were inspected by the loan specialist and ESMS coordinator. According to the mentioned Conclusion, the project is given 4th category of environmental impact.
ADB environmental category B/social category (environmental resettlement) C. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State associated with this subproject that were identified Ecological Expertise, this project falls through due diligence conducted by your under the category 4 based on the organization, and how were the issues dealt with resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? of tСe RepublТc of UzbekТstan №152 dated 5/06/2009.
Impact on water: Water supply of the object will be carried out by water from brought artesian well. Water consumption for household and drinking needs of workers will be 200, m3 / year. Water consumption for washing floors 100,0 m3 / year, irrigation of the territory with a ground surface-2000, m3/year. Irretrievable water consumption, effluents are not formed.
Waste: In the course of business activity of the site, the following waste can be generated: municipal waste- 2.5 tons/year, and waste from cleaning the territory - 15.0 tons/year.
The following ecological requirements must be fulfilled:
- Take measures for safeguarding trees, growing at the site during construction work; - Community waste must be temporary stored in containers and after it taken to local waste site; - To control use and fulfil freon in cold fridge.
It is forbidden to discharge sewage water into natural open water bodies, burn waste on the territory of the site, water green plants with drinking water. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank inspectors carefully applicable environmental and social safeguard discussed with the subproject owner requirements and their implementation? all the requirements regarding the environmental, ecological and social safeguard that he/she should meet during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it does, as witnessed by the government requirements? positive Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Additionally staff of ecological committee ll be check requirements of ecology at least once a year.
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, as the results of analyzes safeguard requirements? shows, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there have not been any compliance or requests for corrective actions? recorded incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, there have not been any lodged on the subproject by any affected person or grievances or complaints lodged on concerned stakeholder? the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder.
Name of Subproject Company: "Dil shams qamar" LLC
Subproject location: Andijan region
Horticulture sector: Dryer fruits and vegetables
Value of exposure (US$ ): 265.9
Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, there were carried out analysis undertaken by your organization? of environmental impact (ecological screening), as well as social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits had been conducted by credit expert of branch.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. Copy of ZVOS (statement of reports reviewed by your organization? environmental impact) and positive Conclusion of State ecological expertise were inspected by the loan specialist and ESMS coordinator. According to the mentioned Conclusion, the project is given 4th category of environmental impact.
ADB environmental category B/social category (environmental resettlement) C. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State associated with this subproject that were identified Ecological Expertise, this project falls through due diligence conducted by your under the category 4 based on the organization, and how were the issues dealt with resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? of tСe RepublТc of UzbekТstan №152 dated 5/06/2009.
Impact on water: Water supply of the object will be carried out by water from brought artesian well. Water consumption for household and drinking needs of workers will be 200, m3 / year. Water consumption for washing floors 100,0 m3 / year, irrigation of the territory with a ground surface-2000, m3/year. Irretrievable water consumption, effluents are not formed. Waste: In the course of business activity of the site, the following waste can be generated: municipal waste- 2.5 tons/year, and waste from cleaning the territory - 15.0 tons/year.
The following ecological requirements must be fulfilled:
- Take measures for safeguarding trees, growing at the site during construction work; - Community waste must be temporary stored in containers and after it taken to local waste site;
It is forbidden to discharge sewage water into natural open water bodies, burn waste on the territory of the site, water green plants with drinking water. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank inspectors carefully applicable environmental and social safeguard discussed with the subproject owner requirements and their implementation? all the requirements regarding the environmental, ecological and social safeguard that he/she should meet during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it does, as witnessed by the government requirements? positive Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Additionally staff of ecological committee ll be check requirements of ecology at least once a year.
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, as the results of analyzes safeguard requirements? shows, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there have not been any compliance or requests for corrective actions? recorded incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, there have not been any lodged on the subproject by any affected person or grievances or complaints lodged on concerned stakeholder? the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder.
Name of Subproject Company: "Dil shams qamar" LLC Subproject location: Andijan region
Horticulture sector: Dryer fruits and vegetables
Value of exposure (US$ ): 265.9
Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, there were carried out analysis undertaken by your organization? of environmental impact (ecological screening), as well as social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits had been conducted by credit expert of branch.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. Copy of ZVOS (statement of reports reviewed by your organization? environmental impact) and positive Conclusion of State ecological expertise were inspected by the loan specialist and ESMS coordinator. According to the mentioned Conclusion, the project is given 4th category of environmental impact.
ADB environmental category B/social category (environmental resettlement) C. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State associated with this subproject that were identified Ecological Expertise, this project falls through due diligence conducted by your under the category 4 based on the organization, and how were the issues dealt with resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? of tСe RepublТc of UzbekТstan №152 dated 5/06/2009.
Impact on water: Water supply of the object will be carried out by water from brought artesian well. Water consumption for household and drinking needs of workers will be 200, m3 / year. Water consumption for washing floors 100,0 m3 / year, irrigation of the territory with a ground surface-2000, m3/year. Irretrievable water consumption, effluents are not formed.
Waste: In the course of business activity of the site, the following waste can be generated: municipal waste- 2.5 tons/year, and waste from cleaning the territory - 15.0 tons/year. The following ecological requirements must be fulfilled:
- Take measures for safeguarding trees, growing at the site during construction work; - Community waste must be temporary stored in containers and after it taken to local waste site;
It is forbidden to discharge sewage water into natural open water bodies, burn waste on the territory of the site, water green plants with drinking water. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank inspectors carefully applicable environmental and social safeguard discussed with the subproject owner requirements and their implementation? all the requirements regarding the environmental, ecological and social safeguard that he/she should meet during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it does, as witnessed by the government requirements? positive Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Additionally staff of ecological committee ll be check requirements of ecology at least once a year.
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, as the results of analyzes safeguard requirements? shows, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there have not been any compliance or requests for corrective actions? recorded incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, there have not been any lodged on the subproject by any affected person or grievances or complaints lodged on concerned stakeholder? the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder.
Name of Subproject Company: «Ozodbek -ServТs» LLC
Subproject location: Bukhara region
Horticulture sector: Greenhouse
Value of exposure (US$ ): 390 Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, there were carried out analysis undertaken by your organization? of environmental impact (ecological screening), as well as social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits had been conducted by credit expert of branch.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. Copy of ZVOS (statement of reports reviewed by your organization? environmental impact) and positive Conclusion of State ecological expertise were inspected by the loan specialist and ESMS coordinator. According to the mentioned Conclusion, the project is given 4th category of environmental impact.
ADB environmental category B/social category (environmental resettlement) C. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State associated with this subproject that were identified Ecological Expertise, this project falls through due diligence conducted by your under the category 4 based on the organization, and how were the issues dealt with resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? of tСe RepublТc of UzbekТstan №152 dated 5/06/2009.
Impact on water: Water supply of the object will be carried out by water from brought artesian well. Water consumption for household and drinking needs of workers will be 200, m3 / year. Water consumption for washing floors 100,0 m3 / year, irrigation of the territory with a ground surface-2000, m3/year. Irretrievable water consumption, effluents are not formed.
Waste: In the course of business activity of the site, the following waste can be generated: municipal waste- 2.5 tons/year, and waste from cleaning the territory - 15.0 tons/year.
The following ecological requirements must be fulfilled:
- Take measures for safeguarding trees, growing at the site during construction work; - Community waste must be temporary stored in containers and after it taken to local waste site;
It is forbidden to discharge sewage water into natural open water bodies, burn waste on the territory of the site, water green plants with drinking water. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank inspectors carefully applicable environmental and social safeguard discussed with the subproject owner requirements and their implementation? all the requirements regarding the environmental, ecological and social safeguard that he/she should meet during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it does, as witnessed by the government requirements? positive Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Additionally staff of ecological committee ll be check requirements of ecology at least once a year.
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, as the results of analyzes safeguard requirements? shows, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there have not been any compliance or requests for corrective actions? recorded incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, there have not been any lodged on the subproject by any affected person or grievances or complaints lodged on concerned stakeholder? the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder.
Name of Subproject Company: "Marokand agro invest" Farming
Subproject location: Samarkand region
Horticulture sector: Intensive Garden
Value of exposure (US$ ): 992,6
Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, there were carried out analysis undertaken by your organization? of environmental impact (ecological screening), as well as social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits had been conducted by credit expert of branch.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. Copy of ZVOS (statement of reports reviewed by your organization? environmental impact) and positive Conclusion of State ecological expertise were inspected by the loan specialist and ESMS coordinator. According to the mentioned Conclusion, the project is given 4th category of environmental impact.
ADB environmental category B/social category (environmental resettlement) C. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State associated with this subproject that were identified Ecological Expertise, this project falls through due diligence conducted by your under the category 4 based on the organization, and how were the issues dealt with resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? of tСe RepublТc of UzbekТstan №152 dated 5/06/2009.
Impact on water: Water supply of the object will be carried out by water from brought artesian well. Water consumption for household and drinking needs of workers will be 200, m3 / year. Water consumption for washing floors 100,0 m3 / year, irrigation of the territory with a ground surface-2000, m3/year. Irretrievable water consumption, effluents are not formed.
Waste: In the course of business activity of the site, the following waste can be generated: municipal waste- 2.5 tons/year, and waste from cleaning the territory - 15.0 tons/year.
The following ecological requirements must be fulfilled:
- Take measures for safeguarding trees, growing at the site during construction work; - Community waste must be temporary stored in containers and after it taken to local waste site;
It is forbidden to discharge sewage water into natural open water bodies, burn waste on the territory of the site, water green plants with drinking water. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank inspectors carefully applicable environmental and social safeguard discussed with the subproject owner requirements and their implementation? all the requirements regarding the environmental, ecological and social safeguard that he/she should meet during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it does, as witnessed by the government requirements? positive Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Additionally staff of ecological committee ll be check requirements of ecology at least once a year.
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, as the results of analyzes safeguard requirements? shows, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there have not been any compliance or requests for corrective actions? recorded incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, there have not been any lodged on the subproject by any affected person or grievances or complaints lodged on concerned stakeholder? the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder.
Name of Subproject Company: "Pastdarg'om Erkin Sabzavotlari" Farming
Subproject location: Samarkand region
Horticulture sector: Greenhouse
Value of exposure (US$ ): 1000
Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, there were carried out analysis undertaken by your organization? of environmental impact (ecological screening), as well as social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits had been conducted by credit expert of branch.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. Copy of ZVOS (statement of reports reviewed by your organization? environmental impact) and positive Conclusion of State ecological expertise were inspected by the loan specialist and ESMS coordinator. According to the mentioned Conclusion, the project is given 4th category of environmental impact.
ADB environmental category B/social category (environmental resettlement) C. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State associated with this subproject that were identified Ecological Expertise, this project falls through due diligence conducted by your under the category 4 based on the organization, and how were the issues dealt with resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? of tСe RepublТc of UzbekТstan №152 dated 5/06/2009.
Impact on water: Water supply of the object will be carried out by water from brought artesian well. Water consumption for household and drinking needs of workers will be 200, m3 / year. Water consumption for washing floors 100,0 m3 / year, irrigation of the territory with a ground surface-2000, m3/year. Irretrievable water consumption, effluents are not formed.
Waste: In the course of business activity of the site, the following waste can be generated: municipal waste- 2.5 tons/year, and waste from cleaning the territory - 15.0 tons/year.
The following ecological requirements must be fulfilled:
- Take measures for safeguarding trees, growing at the site during construction work; - Community waste must be temporary stored in containers and after it taken to local waste site;
It is forbidden to discharge sewage water into natural open water bodies, burn waste on the territory of the site, water green plants with drinking water. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank inspectors carefully applicable environmental and social safeguard discussed with the subproject owner requirements and their implementation? all the requirements regarding the environmental, ecological and social safeguard that he/she should meet during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it does, as witnessed by the government requirements? positive Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Additionally staff of ecological committee ll be check requirements of ecology at least once a year.
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, as the results of analyzes safeguard requirements? shows, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there have not been any compliance or requests for corrective actions? recorded incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, there have not been any lodged on the subproject by any affected person or grievances or complaints lodged on concerned stakeholder? the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder.
Name of Subproject Company: "Platina Parnik Servis" LLC
Subproject location: Samarkand region
Horticulture sector: Greenhouse
Value of exposure (US$ ): 500
Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, there were carried out analysis undertaken by your organization? of environmental impact (ecological screening), as well as social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits had been conducted by credit expert of branch. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. Copy of ZVOS (statement of reports reviewed by your organization? environmental impact) and positive Conclusion of State ecological expertise were inspected by the loan specialist and ESMS coordinator. According to the mentioned Conclusion, the project is given 4th category of environmental impact.
ADB environmental category B/social category (environmental resettlement) C. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State associated with this subproject that were identified Ecological Expertise, this project falls through due diligence conducted by your under the category 4 based on the organization, and how were the issues dealt with resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? of tСe RepublТc of UzbekТstan №152 dated 5/06/2009.
Impact on water: Water supply of the object will be carried out by water from brought artesian well. Water consumption for household and drinking needs of workers will be 200, m3 / year. Water consumption for washing floors 100,0 m3 / year, irrigation of the territory with a ground surface-2000, m3/year. Irretrievable water consumption, effluents are not formed.
Waste: In the course of business activity of the site, the following waste can be generated: municipal waste- 2.5 tons/year, and waste from cleaning the territory - 15.0 tons/year.
The following ecological requirements must be fulfilled:
- Take measures for safeguarding trees, growing at the site during construction work; - Community waste must be temporary stored in containers and after it taken to local waste site;
It is forbidden to discharge sewage water into natural open water bodies, burn waste on the territory of the site, water green plants with drinking water. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank inspectors carefully applicable environmental and social safeguard discussed with the subproject owner requirements and their implementation? all the requirements regarding the environmental, ecological and social safeguard that he/she should meet during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it does, as witnessed by the government requirements? positive Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Additionally staff of ecological committee ll be check requirements of ecology at least once a year.
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, as the results of analyzes safeguard requirements? shows, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there have not been any compliance or requests for corrective actions? recorded incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, there have not been any lodged on the subproject by any affected person or grievances or complaints lodged on concerned stakeholder? the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder.
Name of Subproject Company: "Qiziriq ximiyaviy ugit" LLC
Subproject location: Surkhandarya region
Horticulture sector: Cold storages
Value of exposure (US$ ): 244.7
Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, there were carried out analysis undertaken by your organization? of environmental impact (ecological screening), as well as social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits had been conducted by credit expert of branch.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. Copy of ZVOS (statement of reports reviewed by your organization? environmental impact) and positive Conclusion of State ecological expertise were inspected by the loan specialist and ESMS coordinator. According to the mentioned Conclusion, the project is given 4th category of environmental impact.
ADB environmental category B/social category (environmental resettlement) C. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State associated with this subproject that were identified Ecological Expertise, this project falls through due diligence conducted by your under the category 4 based on the organization, and how were the issues dealt with resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? of tСe RepublТc of UzbekТstan №152 dated 5/06/2009.
Impact on water: Water supply of the object will be carried out by water from brought artesian well. Water consumption for household and drinking needs of workers will be 200, m3 / year. Water consumption for washing floors 100,0 m3 / year, irrigation of the territory with a ground surface-2000, m3/year. Irretrievable water consumption, effluents are not formed.
Waste: In the course of business activity of the site, the following waste can be generated: municipal waste- 2.5 tons/year, and waste from cleaning the territory - 15.0 tons/year.
The following ecological requirements must be fulfilled:
- Take measures for safeguarding trees, growing at the site during construction work; - Community waste must be temporary stored in containers and after it taken to local waste site; - To control use and fulfil freon in cold fridge.
It is forbidden to discharge sewage water into natural open water bodies, burn waste on the territory of the site, water green plants with drinking water. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank inspectors carefully applicable environmental and social safeguard discussed with the subproject owner requirements and their implementation? all the requirements regarding the environmental, ecological and social safeguard that he/she should meet during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it does, as witnessed by the government requirements? positive Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Additionally staff of ecological committee ll be check requirements of ecology at least once a year.
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, as the results of analyzes safeguard requirements? shows, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there have not been any compliance or requests for corrective actions? recorded incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, there have not been any lodged on the subproject by any affected person or grievances or complaints lodged on concerned stakeholder? the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder.
Name of Subproject Company: «PERFECT LOGISTICS» LLC
Subproject location: Khorezm region
Horticulture sector: Greenhouse and cold storages
Value of exposure (US$ ): 1090.8
Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, there were carried out analysis undertaken by your organization? of environmental impact (ecological screening), as well as social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits had been conducted by credit expert of branch.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. Copy of ZVOS (statement of reports reviewed by your organization? environmental impact) and positive Conclusion of State ecological expertise were inspected by the loan specialist and ESMS coordinator. According to the mentioned Conclusion, the project is given 4th category of environmental impact.
ADB environmental category B/social category (environmental resettlement) C. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State associated with this subproject that were identified Ecological Expertise, this project falls through due diligence conducted by your under the category 4 based on the organization, and how were the issues dealt with resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? of tСe RepublТc of UzbekТstan №152 dated 5/06/2009.
Impact on water: Water supply of the object will be carried out by water from brought artesian well. Water consumption for household and drinking needs of workers will be 200, m3 / year. Water consumption for washing floors 100,0 m3 / year, irrigation of the territory with a ground surface-2000, m3/year. Irretrievable water consumption, effluents are not formed.
Waste: In the course of business activity of the site, the following waste can be generated: municipal waste- 2.5 tons/year, and waste from cleaning the territory - 15.0 tons/year.
The following ecological requirements must be fulfilled:
- Take measures for safeguarding trees, growing at the site during construction work; - Community waste must be temporary stored in containers and after it taken to local waste site; - To control use and fulfil freon in cold fridge; - To control use limit of using gaz.
It is forbidden to discharge sewage water into natural open water bodies, burn waste on the territory of the site, water green plants with drinking water. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank inspectors carefully applicable environmental and social safeguard discussed with the subproject owner requirements and their implementation? all the requirements regarding the environmental, ecological and social safeguard that he/she should meet during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it does, as witnessed by the government requirements? positive Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Additionally staff of ecological committee ll be check requirements of ecology at least once a year.
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, as the results of analyzes safeguard requirements? shows, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there have not been any compliance or requests for corrective actions? recorded incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, there have not been any lodged on the subproject by any affected person or grievances or complaints lodged on concerned stakeholder? the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder.
Name of Subproject Company: «MТller Grand KapТtal» PE
Subproject location: Tashkent city
Horticulture sector: Production of fruit beverages
Value of exposure (US$ ): 948,5
Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, there were carried out analysis undertaken by your organization? of environmental impact (ecological screening), as well as social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits had been conducted by credit expert of branch.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. Copy of ZVOS (statement of reports reviewed by your organization? environmental impact) and positive Conclusion of State ecological expertise were inspected by the loan specialist and ESMS coordinator. According to the mentioned Conclusion, the project is given 4th category of environmental impact. ADB environmental category B/social category (environmental resettlement) C. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State associated with this subproject that were identified Ecological Expertise, this project falls through due diligence conducted by your under the category 4 based on the organization, and how were the issues dealt with resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? of tСe RepublТc of UzbekТstan №152 dated 5/06/2009.
Impact on water: Water supply of the object will be carried out by water from brought artesian well. Water consumption for household and drinking needs of workers will be 200, m3 / year. Water consumption for washing floors 100,0 m3 / year, irrigation of the territory with a ground surface-2000, m3/year. Irretrievable water consumption, effluents are not formed.
Waste: In the course of business activity of the site, the following waste can be generated: municipal waste- 2.5 tons/year, and waste from cleaning the territory - 15.0 tons/year.
The following ecological requirements must be fulfilled:
- Take measures for safeguarding trees, growing at the site during construction work; - Community waste must be temporary stored in containers and after it taken to local waste site;
It is forbidden to discharge sewage water into natural open water bodies, burn waste on the territory of the site, water green plants with drinking water. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank inspectors carefully applicable environmental and social safeguard discussed with the subproject owner requirements and their implementation? all the requirements regarding the environmental, ecological and social safeguard that he/she should meet during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it does, as witnessed by the government requirements? positive Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Additionally staff of ecological committee ll be check requirements of ecology at least once a year.
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, as the results of analyzes safeguard requirements? shows, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there have not been any compliance or requests for corrective actions? recorded incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, there have not been any lodged on the subproject by any affected person or grievances or complaints lodged on concerned stakeholder? the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder.
Name of Subproject Company: “RavsСan ВodТk ProductТon” LLC
Subproject location: Tashkent city
Horticulture sector: Manufacture carton boxes for fruits and veget
Value of exposure (US$ ): 500.0
Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, there were carried out analysis undertaken by your organization? of environmental impact (ecological screening), as well as social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits had been conducted by credit expert of branch.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. Copy of ZVOS (statement of reports reviewed by your organization? environmental impact) and positive Conclusion of State ecological expertise were inspected by the loan specialist and ESMS coordinator. According to the mentioned Conclusion, the project is given 4th category of environmental impact.
ADB environmental category B/social category (environmental resettlement) C. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State associated with this subproject that were identified Ecological Expertise, this project falls through due diligence conducted by your under the category 4 based on the organization, and how were the issues dealt with resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? of tСe RepublТc of UzbekТstan №152 dated 5/06/2009.
Impact on water: Water supply of the object will be carried out by water from brought artesian well. Water consumption for household and drinking needs of workers will be 200, m3 / year. Water consumption for washing floors 100,0 m3 / year, irrigation of the territory with a ground surface-2000, m3/year. Irretrievable water consumption, effluents are not formed.
Waste: In the course of business activity of the site, the following waste can be generated: municipal waste- 2.5 tons/year, and waste from cleaning the territory - 15.0 tons/year.
The following ecological requirements must be fulfilled:
- Take measures for safeguarding trees, growing at the site during construction work; - Community waste must be temporary stored in containers and after it taken to local waste site;
It is forbidden to discharge sewage water into natural open water bodies, burn waste on the territory of the site, water green plants with drinking water. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank inspectors carefully applicable environmental and social safeguard discussed with the subproject owner requirements and their implementation? all the requirements regarding the environmental, ecological and social safeguard that he/she should meet during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it does, as witnessed by the government requirements? positive Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Additionally staff of ecological committee ll be check requirements of ecology at least once a year.
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, as the results of analyzes safeguard requirements? shows, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there have not been any compliance or requests for corrective actions? recorded incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, there have not been any lodged on the subproject by any affected person or grievances or complaints lodged on concerned stakeholder? the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder.
Name of Subproject Company: «MТrzaСamdeov RavsСan» PE
Subproject location: Tashkent region
Horticulture sector: cold storages
Value of exposure (US$ ): 250.0
Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, there were carried out analysis undertaken by your organization? of environmental impact (ecological screening), as well as social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits had been conducted by credit expert of branch.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. Copy of ZVOS (statement of reports reviewed by your organization? environmental impact) and positive Conclusion of State ecological expertise were inspected by the loan specialist and ESMS coordinator. According to the mentioned Conclusion, the project is given 4th category of environmental impact.
ADB environmental category B/social category (environmental resettlement) C. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State associated with this subproject that were identified Ecological Expertise, this project falls through due diligence conducted by your under the category 4 based on the organization, and how were the issues dealt with resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? of tСe RepublТc of UzbekТstan №152 dated 5/06/2009.
Impact on water: Water supply of the object will be carried out by water from brought artesian well. Water consumption for household and drinking needs of workers will be 200, m3 / year. Water consumption for washing floors 100,0 m3 / year, irrigation of the territory with a ground surface-2000, m3/year. Irretrievable water consumption, effluents are not formed.
Waste: In the course of business activity of the site, the following waste can be generated: municipal waste- 2.5 tons/year, and waste from cleaning the territory - 15.0 tons/year.
The following ecological requirements must be fulfilled:
- Take measures for safeguarding trees, growing at the site during construction work; - Community waste must be temporary stored in containers and after it taken to local waste site; - To control use and fulfil freon in cold fridge.
It is forbidden to discharge sewage water into natural open water bodies, burn waste on the territory of the site, water green plants with drinking water. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank inspectors carefully applicable environmental and social safeguard discussed with the subproject owner requirements and their implementation? all the requirements regarding the environmental, ecological and social safeguard that he/she should meet during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it does, as witnessed by the government requirements? positive Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Additionally staff of ecological committee ll be check requirements of ecology at least once a year. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, as the results of analyzes safeguard requirements? shows, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there have not been any compliance or requests for corrective actions? recorded incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, there have not been any lodged on the subproject by any affected person or grievances or complaints lodged on concerned stakeholder? the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder.
Name of Subproject Company: "Turkiston Mirishkorlari" LLC
Subproject location: Tashkent region
Horticulture sector: Cold storages
Value of exposure (US$ ): 376,8
Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, there were carried out analysis undertaken by your organization? of environmental impact (ecological screening), as well as social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits had been conducted by credit expert of branch.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. Copy of ZVOS (statement of reports reviewed by your organization? environmental impact) and positive Conclusion of State ecological expertise were inspected by the loan specialist and ESMS coordinator. According to the mentioned Conclusion, the project is given 4th category of environmental impact.
ADB environmental category B/social category (environmental resettlement) C. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State associated with this subproject that were identified Ecological Expertise, this project falls through due diligence conducted by your under the category 4 based on the organization, and how were the issues dealt with resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? of tСe RepublТc of UzbekТstan №152 dated 5/06/2009.
Impact on water: Water supply of the object will be carried out by water from brought artesian well. Water consumption for household and drinking needs of workers will be 200, m3 / year. Water consumption for washing floors 100,0 m3 / year, irrigation of the territory with a ground surface-2000, m3/year. Irretrievable water consumption, effluents are not formed.
Waste: In the course of business activity of the site, the following waste can be generated: municipal waste- 2.5 tons/year, and waste from cleaning the territory - 15.0 tons/year.
The following ecological requirements must be fulfilled:
- Take measures for safeguarding trees, growing at the site during construction work; - Community waste must be temporary stored in containers and after it taken to local waste site; - To control use and fulfil freon in cold fridge.
It is forbidden to discharge sewage water into natural open water bodies, burn waste on the territory of the site, water green plants with drinking water. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank inspectors carefully applicable environmental and social safeguard discussed with the subproject owner requirements and their implementation? all the requirements regarding the environmental, ecological and social safeguard that he/she should meet during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it does, as witnessed by the government requirements? positive Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Additionally staff of ecological committee ll be check requirements of ecology at least once a year.
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, as the results of analyzes safeguard requirements? shows, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there have not been any compliance or requests for corrective actions? recorded incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, there have not been any lodged on the subproject by any affected person or grievances or complaints lodged on concerned stakeholder? the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder.
Name of Subproject Company: "Yogdu Fayz bogdorchilik" Farming
Subproject location: Ferghana region
Horticulture sector: Cold storages
Value of exposure (US$ ): 798.5
Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, there were carried out analysis undertaken by your organization? of environmental impact (ecological screening), as well as social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits had been conducted by credit expert of branch.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. Copy of ZVOS (statement of reports reviewed by your organization? environmental impact) and positive Conclusion of State ecological expertise were inspected by the loan specialist and ESMS coordinator. According to the mentioned Conclusion, the project is given 4th category of environmental impact.
ADB environmental category B/social category (environmental resettlement) C. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State associated with this subproject that were identified Ecological Expertise, this project falls through due diligence conducted by your under the category 4 based on the organization, and how were the issues dealt with resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? of tСe RepublТc of UzbekТstan №152 dated 5/06/2009.
Impact on water: Water supply of the object will be carried out by water from brought artesian well. Water consumption for household and drinking needs of workers will be 200, m3 / year. Water consumption for washing floors 100,0 m3 / year, irrigation of the territory with a ground surface-2000, m3/year. Irretrievable water consumption, effluents are not formed.
Waste: In the course of business activity of the site, the following waste can be generated: municipal waste- 2.5 tons/year, and waste from cleaning the territory - 15.0 tons/year.
The following ecological requirements must be fulfilled:
- Take measures for safeguarding trees, growing at the site during construction work; - Community waste must be temporary stored in containers and after it taken to local waste site; - To control use and fulfil freon in cold fridge.
It is forbidden to discharge sewage water into natural open water bodies, burn waste on the territory of the site, water green plants with drinking water. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank inspectors carefully applicable environmental and social safeguard discussed with the subproject owner requirements and their implementation? all the requirements regarding the environmental, ecological and social safeguard that he/she should meet during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it does, as witnessed by the government requirements? positive Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Additionally staff of ecological committee ll be check requirements of ecology at least once a year.
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, as the results of analyzes safeguard requirements? shows, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there have not been any recorded incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? or requests for corrective actions.
Have there been any grievances or complaints No, there have not been any lodged on the subproject by any affected person or grievances or complaints lodged on concerned stakeholder? the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder.
Name of Subproject Company: “FayzlТ Ummon" LLC
Subproject location: Ferghana region
Horticulture sector: Cold
storages and steam boiler for fruits
Value of exposure (US$ ): 798.5
Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, there were carried out analysis undertaken by your organization? of environmental impact (ecological screening), as well as social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits had been conducted by credit expert of branch.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. Copy of ZVOS (statement of reports reviewed by your organization? environmental impact) and positive Conclusion of State ecological expertise were inspected by the loan specialist and ESMS coordinator. According to the mentioned Conclusion, the project is given 4th category of environmental impact.
ADB environmental category B/social category (environmental resettlement) C. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State associated with this subproject that were identified Ecological Expertise, this project falls through due diligence conducted by your under the category 4 based on the organization, and how were the issues dealt with resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? of tСe RepublТc of UzbekТstan №152 dated 5/06/2009.
Impact on water: Water supply of the object will be carried out by water from brought artesian well. Water consumption for household and drinking needs of workers will be 200, m3 / year. Water consumption for washing floors 100,0 m3 / year, irrigation of the territory with a ground surface-2000, m3/year. Irretrievable water consumption, effluents are not formed.
Waste: In the course of business activity of the site, the following waste can be generated: municipal waste- 2.5 tons/year, and waste from cleaning the territory - 15.0 tons/year.
The following ecological requirements must be fulfilled:
- Take measures for safeguarding trees, growing at the site during construction work; - Community waste must be temporary stored in containers and after it taken to local waste site; - To control use and fulfil freon in cold fridge.
It is forbidden to discharge sewage water into natural open water bodies, burn waste on the territory of the site, water green plants with drinking water. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank inspectors carefully applicable environmental and social safeguard discussed with the subproject owner requirements and their implementation? all the requirements regarding the environmental, ecological and social safeguard that he/she should meet during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it does, as witnessed by the government requirements? positive Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Additionally staff of ecological committee ll be check requirements of ecology at least once a year.
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, as the results of analyzes safeguard requirements? shows, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there have not been any compliance or requests for corrective actions? recorded incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, there have not been any lodged on the subproject by any affected person or grievances or complaints lodged on concerned stakeholder? the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder.
PFI’s ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
(To be submitted by PFIs to RRA)
1. Please provide responses to the questions below. Please include additional sheets or attachments as required to provide details on questions that have been answered Yes. The PFI is required to submit the annual performance report to RRA.
Name of the Financial JSCB Hamkorbank Institution
Completed by Avazbek Fazliev (name):
Position in Head of sector for Date:28.12.2018 organization: environmental assessment and monitoring
A. Portfolio Information
Report Covering Period:
From: To:
01.01.2018 31.12.2018
2. For the reporting period, please provide the following information about your portfolio where applicable:
B. Business Lines
Product Description Total exposure Average loan line outstanding for (or most recent transaction) size FY end (US$) (US$) Microfinance Loans or other financial products for individuals 6 640 414 2 923
Small Loans or other financial 6 322 471 37 411 business products for individuals
Long term: Transactions with tenor greater than 12 months
Microfinance Any lending, leasing or other financial assistance to any 145 626 149 2 594 corporate or legal entity other than an individual, with individual transactions less than $50,000
Any lending, leasing or other financial assistance to any 171 600 296 35 988 corporate or legal entity other than an individual, with Small individual transactions less business than $300,000
Other
Other (if Please describe applicable)
C. Exposure by Horticulture Sectors
3. Please provide an indicative percentage of total Innovation to horticulture modernization loan portfolio per subcomponents:
Industrial Sector % of Innovation to horticulture modernization loan portfolio
For purchasing of fruit seedlings, vegetable seeds for greenhouses, vegetable, melon and 43% legume seeds and system installation of drip irrigation systems.
Purchase specialized equipment and attachments and cold rooms, greenhouses 31% and processing equipment, processing and Industrial Sector % of Innovation to horticulture modernization loan portfolio
packaging
Purchasing of cold storages, energy-efficient greenhouses and processing and packaging 26% equipment
{Note: Please attach environmental and social audit or due diligence reports and environmental and social monitoring reports for each Project Company, if available}
4. If engaged in long-term small business finance, please provide information on all loans with: (i) tenor longer than 12 months; and (ii) maximum $5000,000 loan size.
Name of Type of Tenor of Value of Industry Safeguard category Any Subpro- Subpro- loan loan exposure Sector* outstanding ject ject environment using SME/trade (months) (US$) al and IR ADB finance) Env IR IP and IP funds issues during reporting period and (yes/no) actions taken to address the issues
“Nukus N/A Universa l BazasТ” SME 84 641,5 Trade B C none Yes LTD
“Baxt N/A Imkon Rivoj SME 60 cattle- B C None Yes 691,0 Chorvasi breeding ” farm
“AndТjon- C N/A Un” LTD SME 84 250,0 Trade B None Yes
“RukСsС C N/A abod SME 72 fruit and B None Yes Agro 350,0 SaСovat” vegetabl LTD e
“NavoТy C N/A Aziya 150,0 Name of Type of Tenor of Value of Industry Safeguard category Any Subpro- Subpro- loan loan exposure Sector* outstanding ject ject environment using SME/trade (months) (US$) al and IR ADB finance) Env IR IP and IP funds issues during reporting period and (yes/no) actions taken to address the issues
Trans SME 120 freight B None Yes ServТs” services PE
“TemТr N/A Tulagan BoglarТ” SME 84 99,6 Farm B C None Yes farm
“Usta B C N/A
Salimhoji 200,0 ” PE SME 84 Trade None Yes “Fursat B C N/A
MaСorat” 232,7 PE SME 120 Trade None Yes
“SСamat B C N/A on Brok Treyd” SME 60 247,2 productio None Yes LTD ns
“Jasur” B C N/A farm SME 60 45,0 cattle- None Yes breeding
“Sulton fruit and C C N/A bobo” 135,0 vegetabl farm SME 60 e None Yes
“Best B C N/A Butter Producti SME 120 69,0 productio None Yes on” PE ns
“Baraka B C N/A Meva SME 84 Trade None Yes Sanoat 289,0 ServТs” LTD Name of Type of Tenor of Value of Industry Safeguard category Any Subpro- Subpro- loan loan exposure Sector* outstanding ject ject environment using SME/trade (months) (US$) al and IR ADB finance) Env IR IP and IP funds issues during reporting period and (yes/no) actions taken to address the issues
“ВonarТq fruit and C C N/A Davr vegetabl IstТqbolТ” SME 60 58,1 e None Yes LTD
“BogТ fruit and B C N/A
Saryon” 36,6 vegetabl LTD SME 84 e None Yes
“AgroelТt fruit and B C N/A
Parkent” 836,0 vegetabl LTD SME 84 e None Yes
“Abduma B C N/A lik SME 84 Trade None Yes Baraka 124,3 Savdo” LTD
*Please use the sectors listed in the earlier table or any standard classification. Note: Env = Environment, IR = Involuntary Resettlement, IP = Indigenous Peoples.
D. Environmental and Social Management System (ESMS)
5. REQUIREMENT: (1) FOR EXISTING SUBPROJECTS: ATTACHMENTS OF MONITORING REPORTS OR REPORT ON DISCHARGE PERMITS; AND
(2) FOR NEWLY APPROVED SUBPROJECTS: ATTACHMENTS OF ZVOS APPROVAL. Policies & Processes Yes/No Has your organization developed and If yes, please attach a copy of implemented an ESMS? the ESMS to this report. Yes If there is an ESMS already in place, have there been any updates to the Yes If yes, please provide a copy of ESMS or policy and procedures the updates including dates and adopted by your organization during reasons for the same. the reporting period? Has senior management signed off on If yes, please provide the date the updated policy/procedure? and internal communication Yes indicating the same. Has your organization appointed staff Coordinator for compliance with tasked to implement the ESMS? environmental regulations – Yes A.Fazliev - Head of sector for environmental assessment and monitoring. He has 16 years experience in banking and MSME finance, bacСelor’s degree. Please give details of any transactions rejected due to environmental and/or No social concerns.
Please state any difficulties and/or constraints related to the No implementation of the ESMS. Please describe how you ensure that your subproject companies and their Yes We demand the conclusion of subprojects are operated in local environmental expertise. compliance with the national laws and Conduct monitoring and in case regulatТons and applТcable ADB’s violations are identified loan is requirements. suspended. Precautionary measures are undertaken, which are described in the contract. Please give details of any material social and environmental issues No associated with clients during the reporting period.
In case the existing ESMS is not fully functional, what is the action plan No being implemented by your organization?
Capacity Yes/No Please provide the name and contact Coordinator for compliance with environmental regulations – information of the Yes Environmental/Social Officer or A.Fazliev - Head of sector for environmental assessment and Coordinator who has the overall monitoring. responsibility for the implementation of Uzbekistan, 170119 the ESMS. Andijan, 85 Babur st. tel: +998 74 2980043 (1125) mob: +998 90 2530690 [email protected] Training: 13/01/2018 World Bank: training for ESMS; 06/02/2018 ADB: training for ESMS; 23-24/03/2018 ADB: training for ESMS; 13-14/05/2018 workshop for ESMS from IFC. 05-06/08//2018 Green Climate Found: training for ESMS; 10-14/09/2018 Green Climate Found: training for ESMS; 14/11/2018 workshop for ESMS from ADB. Please provide current staffing of All front and Back office staff was other core ESMS persons in the yes trained on-site in the branches to organization involved with ESMS comply with environmental implementation. policies. Head of front office is the focal point for the environment compliance at branches What was the budget allocated to the In our Bank the budget for the ESMS and its implementation during No training not allocated. Trainings the year? are organized as per reports and as per plan of study Monitoring Yes/No Do you receive environmental and social monitoring reports from No subproject companies that you finance?
Do you check for ongoing compliance We check our clients in of your subproject companies with Yes compliance with national national regulation and any other regulation and chek their activity requirements? according to our ESMS policy
Please describe how you monitor the After tСe loan’s dТsbursement we subproject company and their monitor the activities of clients Yes subproject’s socТal and envТronmental once every 6 or 12 months performance. according to our ESMS policy
Do you require the subproject owner to submit to you evidence of No compliance with required environmental and social approvals and permits for the subprojects.
Please provide details of any accidents/ No litigation/complaints/regulatory notices and fines:
- Any incidents of non-compliance with the applicable Environmental and Social Requirements
- Covenants/conditionalities imposed
by the Financial Institution to the subproject company as a result of any non-compliance
Reporting Yes/No Is there an internal process to report Report is provided monthly for on social and environmental issues to mamagement: Yes senior management? 1. The report of the monitoring in the branches 2. The report of the managar’s conclusТons for financial projects
Do you prepare any social and environmental reports: - For other multilateral agencies No
- Other stakeholders - E&S reporting in the Report
Sustainability reports
Activities on ADB’s Prohibited Investment Activities List If any, please indicate the dollar percentage of loans or investments out of 0,38% your total outstanding exposure provided
to clients who are substantially involved in (production of or trade in alcoholic ADB’s ProСТbТted Investment ActТvТtТes LТst beverages) (Refer to page 122 of SPS).
If the percentage is not zero, please explain these exposures and any steps that have been taken to reduce such exposure.
E. Category “B” Subprojects Using ADB Funds
6. Please provide information about all new subprojects using ADB loan funding approved during this reporting period.
Name of Subproject Company: “Nukus UnТversal BazasТ” LTD
Subproject location: Karakalpagistan, Nukus city, Berdak street 6
Horticulture sector: Greenhouse
Value of exposure (US$ ): 641 500,00
Was any environmental and social due We check our clients in compliance diligence undertaken by your with national regulation and chek their organization? activity according to our ESMS policy
Any environmental assessment report or No audit reports reviewed by your organization?
What were the main environmental issues We check our clients in compliance associated with this subproject that were with national regulation and chek their identified through due diligence conducted activity according to our ESMS policy by your organization, and how were the (in ESMS policy in more detail issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due described process analysis of clients) diligence)?
Did you discuss with the subproject owner Yes, we discuss with the owner all our the applicable environmental and social check questions. safeguard requirements and their implementation?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable government requirements?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable ADB safeguard requirements?
Have there been any recorded incidents of No non-compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or No complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: “Baxt Imkon RТvoj CСorvasТ” farm
Subproject location: AndТjan regТon, OltТnko’l dТstrТct
Horticulture sector: Cattle breeding, gardening
Value of exposure (US$ ): 691 000,00
Was any environmental and social due We check our clients in compliance diligence undertaken by your with national regulation and chek their organization? activity according to our ESMS policy
Any environmental assessment report or No audit reports reviewed by your organization?
What were the main environmental issues We check our clients in compliance associated with this subproject that were with national regulation and chek their identified through due diligence conducted activity according to our ESMS policy by your organization, and how were the (in ESMS policy in more detail issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due described process analysis of clients) diligence)?
Did you discuss with the subproject owner Yes, we discuss with the owner all our the applicable environmental and social check questions. safeguard requirements and their implementation?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable government requirements?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable ADB safeguard requirements?
Have there been any recorded incidents of No non-compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or No complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: Andijon-Un LTD
Subproject location: AndТjan regТon, OltТnko’l dТstrТct
Horticulture sector: processing and packaging
Value of exposure (US$ ): 250 000,00
Was any environmental and social due We check our clients in compliance diligence undertaken by your with national regulation and chek their organization? activity according to our ESMS policy
Any environmental assessment report or No audit reports reviewed by your organization?
What were the main environmental issues We check our clients in compliance associated with this subproject that were with national regulation and chek their identified through due diligence conducted activity according to our ESMS policy by your organization, and how were the (in ESMS policy in more detail issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due described process analysis of clients) diligence)?
Did you discuss with the subproject owner Yes, we discuss with the owner all our the applicable environmental and social check questions. safeguard requirements and their implementation?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable government requirements?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable ADB safeguard requirements?
Have there been any recorded incidents of No non-compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or No complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: “RukСsСabod Agro SaСovat” LTD
Subproject location: Bukhara region, Otbozor Rukhshabod village
Horticulture sector: Greenhouse
Value of exposure (US$ ): 350 000,00
Was any environmental and social due We check our clients in compliance diligence undertaken by your with national regulation and chek their organization? activity according to our ESMS policy
Any environmental assessment report or No audit reports reviewed by your organization?
What were the main environmental issues We check our clients in compliance associated with this subproject that were with national regulation and chek their identified through due diligence conducted activity according to our ESMS policy by your organization, and how were the (in ESMS policy in more detail issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due described process analysis of clients) diligence)?
Did you discuss with the subproject owner Yes, we discuss with the owner all our the applicable environmental and social check questions. safeguard requirements and their implementation?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable government requirements?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable ADB safeguard requirements?
Have there been any recorded incidents of No non-compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or No complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: “NavoТy AzТya Trans ServТs” PE
Subproject location: Navoiy region, Karmana district, Nizamiy street 19
Horticulture sector: Greenhouse
Value of exposure (US$ ): 150 000,00
Was any environmental and social due We check our clients in compliance diligence undertaken by your with national regulation and chek their organization? activity according to our ESMS policy
Any environmental assessment report or No audit reports reviewed by your organization?
What were the main environmental issues We check our clients in compliance associated with this subproject that were with national regulation and chek their identified through due diligence conducted activity according to our ESMS policy by your organization, and how were the (in ESMS policy in more detail issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due described process analysis of clients) diligence)?
Did you discuss with the subproject owner Yes, we discuss with the owner all our the applicable environmental and social check questions. safeguard requirements and their implementation?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable government requirements?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable ADB safeguard requirements?
Have there been any recorded incidents of No non-compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or No complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: “TemТr Tulagan BoglarТ” farm
Subproject location: Samarkand region, Urgut district, Ilonli KFY
Horticulture sector: Gardening
Value of exposure (US$ ): 99 600,00
Was any environmental and social due We check our clients in compliance diligence undertaken by your with national regulation and chek their organization? activity according to our ESMS policy
Any environmental assessment report or No audit reports reviewed by your organization?
What were the main environmental issues We check our clients in compliance associated with this subproject that were with national regulation and chek their identified through due diligence conducted activity according to our ESMS policy by your organization, and how were the (in ESMS policy in more detail issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due described process analysis of clients) diligence)?
Did you discuss with the subproject owner Yes, we discuss with the owner all our the applicable environmental and social check questions. safeguard requirements and their implementation?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable government requirements?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable ADB safeguard requirements?
Have there been any recorded incidents of No non-compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or No complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: “Usta SalТmСojТ” PE
Subproject location: Surkhandarya region, Angor district, Ulugbek street 2
Horticulture sector: Cold storage
Value of exposure (US$ ): 200 000,00
Was any environmental and social due We check our clients in compliance diligence undertaken by your with national regulation and chek their organization? activity according to our ESMS policy
Any environmental assessment report or No audit reports reviewed by your organization?
What were the main environmental issues We check our clients in compliance associated with this subproject that were with national regulation and chek their identified through due diligence conducted activity according to our ESMS policy by your organization, and how were the (in ESMS policy in more detail issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due described process analysis of clients) diligence)?
Did you discuss with the subproject owner Yes, we discuss with the owner all our the applicable environmental and social check questions. safeguard requirements and their implementation?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable government requirements?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable ADB safeguard requirements?
Have there been any recorded incidents of No non-compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or No complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: “Fursat MaСorat” PE
Subproject location: Surkhandarya region, Denov district, Urtabuz MFY
Horticulture sector: Cold storage
Value of exposure (US$ ): 232 700,00
Was any environmental and social due We check our clients in compliance diligence undertaken by your with national regulation and chek their organization? activity according to our ESMS policy
Any environmental assessment report or No audit reports reviewed by your organization?
What were the main environmental issues We check our clients in compliance associated with this subproject that were with national regulation and chek their identified through due diligence conducted activity according to our ESMS policy by your organization, and how were the (in ESMS policy in more detail issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due described process analysis of clients) diligence)?
Did you discuss with the subproject owner Yes, we discuss with the owner all our the applicable environmental and social check questions. safeguard requirements and their implementation?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable government requirements?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable ADB safeguard requirements?
Have there been any recorded incidents of No non-compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or No complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: “SСamaton Brok Treyd” LTD
Subproject location: Kashkadarya region, Shakhrisabz district, Pillakashlik MFY, Pillakashlik str, 24 u
Horticulture sector: Cold storage
Value of exposure (US$ ): 247 200,00
Was any environmental and social due We check our clients in compliance diligence undertaken by your with national regulation and chek their organization? activity according to our ESMS policy
Any environmental assessment report or No audit reports reviewed by your organization?
What were the main environmental issues We check our clients in compliance associated with this subproject that were with national regulation and chek their identified through due diligence conducted activity according to our ESMS policy by your organization, and how were the (in ESMS policy in more detail issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due described process analysis of clients) diligence)?
Did you discuss with the subproject owner Yes, we discuss with the owner all our the applicable environmental and social check questions. safeguard requirements and their implementation?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable government requirements?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable ADB safeguard requirements?
Have there been any recorded incidents of No non-compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or No complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: “Jasur” farm
Subproject location: Samarkand region, Samarkand district, Kulbapayon MFY
Horticulture sector: Cold storage
Value of exposure (US$ ): 45 000,00
Was any environmental and social due We check our clients in compliance diligence undertaken by your with national regulation and chek their organization? activity according to our ESMS policy
Any environmental assessment report or No audit reports reviewed by your organization?
What were the main environmental issues We check our clients in compliance associated with this subproject that were with national regulation and chek their identified through due diligence conducted activity according to our ESMS policy by your organization, and how were the (in ESMS policy in more detail issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due described process analysis of clients) diligence)?
Did you discuss with the subproject owner Yes, we discuss with the owner all our the applicable environmental and social check questions. safeguard requirements and their implementation?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable government requirements?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable ADB safeguard requirements?
Have there been any recorded incidents of No non-compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or No complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: “Sulton bobo” farm
Subproject location: Surkhandarya region, Angor district, Istiqlol KFY
Horticulture sector: Special equipment
Value of exposure (US$ ): 135 000,00
Was any environmental and social due We check our clients in compliance diligence undertaken by your with national regulation and chek their organization? activity according to our ESMS policy
Any environmental assessment report or No audit reports reviewed by your organization?
What were the main environmental issues We check our clients in compliance associated with this subproject that were with national regulation and chek their identified through due diligence conducted activity according to our ESMS policy by your organization, and how were the (in ESMS policy in more detail issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due described process analysis of clients) diligence)?
Did you discuss with the subproject owner Yes, we discuss with the owner all our the applicable environmental and social check questions. safeguard requirements and their implementation?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable government requirements?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable ADB safeguard requirements?
Have there been any recorded incidents of No non-compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or No complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: “Best Butter ProductТon” PE
Subproject location: Khorazm region, Urganch city, Mustaqillik str, 98
Horticulture sector: Cold storage
Value of exposure (US$ ): 69 000,00
Was any environmental and social due We check our clients in compliance diligence undertaken by your with national regulation and chek their organization? activity according to our ESMS policy
Any environmental assessment report or No audit reports reviewed by your organization? What were the main environmental issues We check our clients in compliance associated with this subproject that were with national regulation and chek their identified through due diligence conducted activity according to our ESMS policy by your organization, and how were the (in ESMS policy in more detail issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due described process analysis of clients) diligence)?
Did you discuss with the subproject owner Yes, we discuss with the owner all our the applicable environmental and social check questions. safeguard requirements and their implementation?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable government requirements?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable ADB safeguard requirements?
Have there been any recorded incidents of No non-compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or No complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: “Baraka Meva Sanoat ServТs” LTD
Subproject location: Namangan region, Chust district, Chust KFY
Horticulture sector: Gardening
Value of exposure (US$ ): 289 000,00
Was any environmental and social due We check our clients in compliance diligence undertaken by your with national regulation and chek their organization? activity according to our ESMS policy
Any environmental assessment report or No audit reports reviewed by your organization?
What were the main environmental issues We check our clients in compliance associated with this subproject that were with national regulation and chek their identified through due diligence conducted activity according to our ESMS policy by your organization, and how were the (in ESMS policy in more detail issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due described process analysis of clients) diligence)?
Did you discuss with the subproject owner Yes, we discuss with the owner all our the applicable environmental and social check questions. safeguard requirements and their implementation?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable government requirements?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable ADB safeguard requirements?
Have there been any recorded incidents of No non-compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or No complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: “ВonarТq Davr IstТqbolТ” LTD
Subproject location: Tashkent region, Kibray district, Yanariq KFY
Horticulture sector: Gardening
Value of exposure (US$ ): 58 100,00
Was any environmental and social due We check our clients in compliance diligence undertaken by your with national regulation and chek their organization? activity according to our ESMS policy
Any environmental assessment report or No audit reports reviewed by your organization?
What were the main environmental issues We check our clients in compliance associated with this subproject that were with national regulation and chek their identified through due diligence conducted activity according to our ESMS policy by your organization, and how were the (in ESMS policy in more detail issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due described process analysis of clients) diligence)?
Did you discuss with the subproject owner Yes, we discuss with the owner all our the applicable environmental and social check questions. safeguard requirements and their implementation?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable government requirements?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable ADB safeguard requirements?
Have there been any recorded incidents of No non-compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or No complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: “BogТ Sarayon” LTD
Subproject location: Bukhara region, Kogon district, Sarayon MFY
Horticulture sector: Gardening
Value of exposure (US$ ): 36 600,00 Was any environmental and social due We check our clients in compliance diligence undertaken by your with national regulation and chek their organization? activity according to our ESMS policy
Any environmental assessment report or No audit reports reviewed by your organization?
What were the main environmental issues We check our clients in compliance associated with this subproject that were with national regulation and chek their identified through due diligence conducted activity according to our ESMS policy by your organization, and how were the (in ESMS policy in more detail issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due described process analysis of clients) diligence)?
Did you discuss with the subproject owner Yes, we discuss with the owner all our the applicable environmental and social check questions. safeguard requirements and their implementation?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable government requirements?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable ADB safeguard requirements?
Have there been any recorded incidents of No non-compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or No complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: “AgroelТt Parkent” LTD
Subproject location: Tashkent region, Parkent district
Horticulture sector: Gardening
Value of exposure (US$ ): 836 000,00 Was any environmental and social due We check our clients in compliance diligence undertaken by your with national regulation and chek their organization? activity according to our ESMS policy
Any environmental assessment report or No audit reports reviewed by your organization?
What were the main environmental issues We check our clients in compliance associated with this subproject that were with national regulation and chek their identified through due diligence conducted activity according to our ESMS policy by your organization, and how were the (in ESMS policy in more detail issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due described process analysis of clients) diligence)?
Did you discuss with the subproject owner Yes, we discuss with the owner all our the applicable environmental and social check questions. safeguard requirements and their implementation?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable government requirements?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable ADB safeguard requirements?
Have there been any recorded incidents of No non-compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or No complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: “AbdumalТk baraka savdo” LTD
Subproject location: Tashkent region, Parkent district
Horticulture sector: Cold storage
Value of exposure (US$ ): 124 300,00 Was any environmental and social due We check our clients in compliance diligence undertaken by your with national regulation and chek their organization? activity according to our ESMS policy
Any environmental assessment report or No audit reports reviewed by your organization?
What were the main environmental issues We check our clients in compliance associated with this subproject that were with national regulation and chek their identified through due diligence conducted activity according to our ESMS policy by your organization, and how were the (in ESMS policy in more detail issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due described process analysis of clients) diligence)?
Did you discuss with the subproject owner Yes, we discuss with the owner all our the applicable environmental and social check questions. safeguard requirements and their implementation?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable government requirements?
Does the subproject comply with Yes applicable ADB safeguard requirements?
Have there been any recorded incidents of No non-compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or No complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
1. Please provide responses to the questions below. Please include additional sheets or attachments as required to provide details on questions that have been answered Yes. The Bank is required to submit the annual performance report to RRA.
Name of the Financial National Bank of Uzbekistan for Foreign Economic Institution Activities
Completed by (name): Aslanov Aziz
Position in organization: Head of Department Date: 28.12.2018
A. Portfolio Information
Report Covering Period:
From: 01.01.2018 To: 31.12.2018
2. For the reporting period, please provide the following information about your portfolio where applicable: B. Business Lines
Total exposure Average loan outstanding for (or transaction) Product line Description most recent Fin. size Year end (thousand US$) (thousand US$)
Loans or other financial products for Microfinance individuals 394 390,6 2,6
Small Loans or other financial products for business individuals 12 672,9 0,08
Long term: Transactions with tenor greater than 12 months
Any lending, leasing or other financial assistance to any corporate or legal Micro finance entity other than an individual, with 77 426,5 0,5 individual transactions less than $50,000
Any lending, leasing or other financial assistance to any corporate or legal Small entity other than an individual, with business 182 875,3 1,2 individual transactions less than $300,000
Other Factoring 0 0 Any crediting, leasing or other financial Other assistance to any corporate or legal (if applicable) entity, with the exception of an 4 917 297,8 32,6 individual, with a separate transaction amount of more than $ 300,000
Total 5 584 663,1 37
C. Exposure by Horticulture Sectors
3. Please provide an indicative percentage of total Innovation to horticulture modernization loan portfolio per subcomponents:
% of Investments to horticulture value Industrial Sector chain development project loan portfolio (ADB)
For the purchase of equipment for organizing intensive garden 41,5%
Acquisition of equipment for greenhouses 30,8% Purchase of equipment for a refrigerating household 22,3% Purchase of equipment for processing 5,4%
4. If engaged in long-term small business finance, please provide information on all loans with: (i) tenor longer than 12 months; and (ii) maximum $ 5 000 000 loan size.
Any outstanding Sub- Safeguard environmental Type of Value of project Tenor of category and IR and IP loan exposure Industry using Name of Sub-project loan issues during SME/trade (thousand Sector reporting ADB (months) finance) US$) period and funds actions taken Env IR IP to address the (yes/no) issues
AZIMJON NURIDDIN SAVDO SME 60 123,0 Cold storage B C NO NO YES SERVIS LLC Processing and storing ARAMATI BAGDADA PE SME 60 600 B C NO NO YES fruits and vegetables OLTIARIQ AGRO FAYZ LLC SME 60 198,6 Cold storage B C NO NO YES ECO EXPORT TRADE LLC SME 60 901,5 Cold storage B C NO NO YES GRAND DIAMOND FRUITS SME 60 500 Cold storage B C NO NO YES MIR GRANITA SME 60 486,5 Cold storage B C NO NO YES YUKSALISH CHORVA SME 60 101,4 Cold storage B C NO NO YES SAHOVATI FE GOLDEN FRUIT PRODUCTION SME 60 117 Greenhouse B C NO NO YES FE AGRO EXPORT BARAKA LLC SME 84 2 000 Greenhouse B C NO NO YES UZUN MEVA SABZAVOT SME 60 185 Cold storage B C NO NO YES XOLODILNIK LLC KOSONSOY SERHOSIL Intensive SME 84 4 632 B C NO NO YES INTEVSIV BOGLARI LLC garden ALP JAVOKHIR JAVLONBEK SME 84 1 000 Greenhouse B C NO NO YES LLC ISLOMBEK FIRDAVS AGRO LLC SME 72 326,7 Greenhouse B C NO NO YES
D. Environmental and Social Management System (ESMS)
REQUIREMENT:
Policies & Processes Yes/No Has your organization developed and Yes The ESMS policy and procedures are implemented an ESMS? provided to ADB.
If there is an ESMS already in place, have there been any updates to the ESMS or policy No and procedures adopted by your organization during the reporting period?
Has senior management signed off on the No updated policy/procedure?
Has your organization appointed staff tasked 1 ESMS manager and Yes to implement the ESMS? 14 ESMS coordinators from branche offices s of the bank Please give details of any transactions rejected due to environmental and/or social No Not any transactions rejected due to concerns. environmental and/or social concerns
Please state any difficulties and/or constraints No related to the implementation of the ESMS.
On the basis of the loan agreement and Please describe how you ensure that your in accordance with the legislation of subproject companies and their subprojects the Republic of Uzbekistan, the are operated in compliance with the national Yes borrower is obliged to fulfill all lКws КnН rОРulКtТons КnН КpplТМКblО ADB’s obligations to implement the current requirements. requirements for environmental protection measures Please give details of any material social and Not social and environmental issues environmental issues associated with clients No associated with clients during the during the reporting period. reporting period
In case the existing ESMS is not fully functional, what is the action plan being No The existing ESMS is fully functional. implemented by your organization?
Capacity Yes/No Please provide the name and contact Aslanov Aziz information of the Environmental/Social ( Phone num. : 234-11-17) Officer or Coordinator who has the overall responsibility for the implementation of the ESMS.
Aslanov Aziz Please provide current staffing of other core ( tel: 234-11-17) ESMS persons in the organization involved The Bank conducts training seminars for with ESMS implementation. branch specialists in each quarter of the year. What was the budget allocated to the ESMS and its implementation during the year? Budget was not allocated
Monitoring Yes/No Supporting attached documents. Do you receive environmental and social Environmental Screening Checklist monitoring reports from subproject Yes (Appendix 3) was attached to this companies that you finance? document
According to the legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan, the
Do you check for ongoing compliance of your implementation of national standards subproject companies with national regulation Yes and any other environmental and any other requirements? requirements is controlled by state bodies. The Bank monitors the project to implement their mitigation measures. ESR manager will evaluate ES (environmental and social) preformance of subprojects annually and benchmark of the report will be Please describe how you monitor the monitoring apllicability of sub projects subproУОМt МompКnв КnН tСОТr subproУОМt’s Yes with environmental and social social and environmental performance. safeguard national requirenments. Based on this report the ESR Manager wТll rОvТОw КnН КssОss tСО subproУОМt’s environmental and social safeguard preformance
The initiator of the subproject submits to the Coordinator of the ESMS a confirmation of compliance with the Do you require the subproject owner to necessary environmental and social submit to you evidence of compliance with Yes approvals and permits, on the basis of required environmental and social approvals which the coordinator of the ESMS and permits for the subprojects. monitors and provides the Manager of the ESMS for further reporting on ESMS.
Please provide details of any accidents/ No litigation/complaints/regulatory notices and fines:
- Any incidents of non-compliance with the applicable Environmental and Social Requirements - Covenants/conditionalities imposed by the Financial Institution to the subproject company as a result of any non-compliance
Reporting Yes/No In case of environmnetal issues, ESMS manger in branch will investigate the reason for non complience with envioronmental requirenments, and a Is there an internal process to report on social decision will be taken with subproject and environmental issues to senior Yes owner about what action is needed to management? bring a subproject in to complience with all applicable envioronmental safeguard requirenments. After all detailed report will be submitted to senior manager.
Do you prepare any social and environmental NBU’s soМТКl КnН ОnvТronmОntКl rОports reports: are only provided to ADB - For other multilateral agencies No - Other stakeholders - E&S reporting in the Report Sustainability reports
Activities on ADB’s Prohibited Investment Activities List If any, please indicate the dollar percentage of loans or investments out of your total outstanding exposure provided to clients who are substantially 0 % ТnvolvОН Тn ADB’s ProСТbТtОН InvОstmОnt Activities List (Refer to page 122 of SPS).
If the percentage is not zero, please explain these There is no credit that essentially falls under exposures and any steps that have been taken to the "List of prohibited types of investment reduce such exposure. activities" of ADB E. Category “B” Subprojects Using ADB Funds
5. Please provide information about all new subprojects using ADB loan funding approved during this reporting period.
Name of Subproject Company: AZIMJON NURIDDIN SAVDO SERVIS LLC Subproject location: Fergana region
Establishment of cold storage for fruits and Horticulture sector: vegetables
Value of exposure (US$ ): 123 000,0
Yes, it was. ESMS coordinator confirmed that the subproject owner is undertaking the Was any environmental and social due diligence obligation on compliance with all applicable undertaken by your organization? environmental safeguard requirements, prescribed in ZVOS and conducted site visit and prepared site inspection report
Any environmental assessment report or audit The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues associated with this subproject that were identified through due diligence conducted by your No organization, and how were the issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due diligence)?
Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and Did you discuss with the subproject owner the clarified to the subproject owner all the applicable environmental and social safeguard requirements regarding the environmental and requirements and their implementation? social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise
Yes, according to the results of preliminary Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence safeguard requirements? this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or No concerned stakeholder? Name of Subproject Company: ARAMATI BAGDADA PE
Subproject location: Fergana region
Horticulture sector: Processing and storing fruits and vegetables
Value of exposure (US$ ): 600 000,0 Yes it was. ESMS confirmed that the subproject owner is undertaking the obligation Was any environmental and social due diligence on compliance with all applicable undertaken by your organization? environmental safeguard requirements, prescribed in ZVOS and conducted site visit and prepared site inspection report
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues During conducted monitoring on environmental associated with this subproject that were identified issues, subproject owner was instructed to set through due diligence conducted by your up special container to take vegetables and organization, and how were the issues dealt with fruits waste every day and deliver it to a special (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? enterprise for processing it for animal foods.
Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and Did you discuss with the subproject owner the clarified to the subproject owner all the applicable environmental and social safeguard requirements regarding the environmental and requirements and their implementation? social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise
Yes, according to the results of preliminary Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence safeguard requirements? this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or No concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: OLTIARIQ AGRO FAYZ LLC
Subproject location: Fergana region
Horticulture sector: Establishment of cold storage
Value of exposure (US$ ): 198 564,0
Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, it was. Held. ESMS coordinator confirmed undertaken by your organization? that the subproject owner is undertaking the obligation on compliance with all applicable environmental safeguard requirements, prescribed in ZVOS and conducted site visit and prepared site inspection report
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review.
What were the main environmental issues During conducted monitoring on environmental associated with this subproject that were identified issues, subproject owner was instructed to set through due diligence conducted by your up special plastic container to take waste every organization, and how were the issues dealt with day and deliver it to a special enterprise which (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? process vegetables waste for animal foods
Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and Did you discuss with the subproject owner the clarified to the subproject owner all the applicable environmental and social safeguard requirements regarding the environmental and requirements and their implementation? social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or No concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: GRAND DIAMOND FRUITS FE
Subproject location: Fergana region Horticulture sector: Organizing cold storage
Value of exposure (US$ ): 500 000,0 Yes it was. ESMS confirmed that the Was any environmental and social due diligence subproject owner is undertaking the obligation undertaken by your organization? on compliance with all applicable environmental safeguard requirements, prescribed in ZVOS and conducted site visit and prepared site inspection report
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. During conducted monitoring on environmental What were the main environmental issues issues, subproject owner was instructed to set associated with this subproject that were identified up special plastic container to take vegetables through due diligence conducted by your and fruits waste every day and deliver it to a organization, and how were the issues dealt with special enterprise for processing it for animal (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? foods
Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and Did you discuss with the subproject owner the clarified to the subproject owner all the applicable environmental and social safeguard requirements regarding the environmental and requirements and their implementation? social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise
Yes, according to the results of preliminary Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence safeguard requirements? this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or No concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: MIR GRANITA PE
Subproject location: Fergana region Horticulture sector: Organizing cold storage
Value of exposure (US$ ): 486 500,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes it was. ESMS coordinator confirmed that undertaken by your organization? the subproject owner is undertaking the obligation on compliance with all applicable environmental safeguard requirements, prescribed in ZVOS and conducted site visit and prepared site inspection report
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues During conducted monitoring on environmental associated with this subproject that were identified issues, initiator of subproject was instructed to through due diligence conducted by your maintain cold storage engine in good condition organization, and how were the issues dealt with and set up containers for waste (i.e., outcome of due diligence)?
Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and Did you discuss with the subproject owner the clarified to the subproject owner all the applicable environmental and social safeguard requirements regarding the environmental and requirements and their implementation? social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or No concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: ECO EXPORT TRADE LLC
Subproject location: Fergana region Horticulture sector: Organizing cold storage
Value of exposure (US$ ): 901 524,96 Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes it was. ESMS coordinator confirmed that undertaken by your organization? the subproject owner is undertaking the obligation on compliance with all applicable environmental safeguard requirements, prescribed in ZVOS and conducted site visit and prepared site inspection report
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues During conducted monitoring on environmental associated with this subproject that were identified issues, initiator of subproject was instructed to through due diligence conducted by your maintain cold storage engine in good condition organization, and how were the issues dealt with and set up containers for waste (i.e., outcome of due diligence)?
Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and Did you discuss with the subproject owner the clarified to the subproject owner all the applicable environmental and social safeguard requirements regarding the environmental and requirements and their implementation? social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or No concerned stakeholder? Name of Subproject Company: YUKSALISH CHORVA SAHOVATI FE
Subproject location: Fergana region
Horticulture sector: Organizing cold storage
Value of exposure (US$ ): 101 400,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Held. ESMS coordinator confirmed that the undertaken by your organization? subproject owner is undertaking the obligation on compliance with all applicable environmental safeguard requirements, prescribed in ZVOS and conducted site visit and prepared site inspection report
Any environmental assessment report or audit reports reviewed by your organization? Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the conclusions of the state environmental review.
What were the main environmental issues During conducted monitoring on environmental associated with this subproject that were identified issues, subproject owner was instructed to set through due diligence conducted by your up special plastic container to take vegetables organization, and how were the issues dealt with and fruits waste every day and deliver it to a (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? special enterprise for processing it for animal foods
Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and Did you discuss with the subproject owner the clarified to the subproject owner all the applicable environmental and social safeguard requirements regarding the environmental and requirements and their implementation? social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or No concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: GOLDEN FRUIT PRODUCTION FE
Subproject location: Bukhara region
Horticulture sector: Organizing cold storage
Value of exposure (US$ ): 117 000,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, it was. ESMS coordinator confirmed that undertaken by your organization? the subproject owner is undertaking the obligation on compliance with all applicable environmental safeguard requirements, prescribed in ZVOS and conducted site visit and prepared site inspection report.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues During conducted monitoring on environmental associated with this subproject that were identified issues, initiator of subproject was instructed to through due diligence conducted by your maintain cold storage engine in good condition organization, and how were the issues dealt with and set up containers for waste (i.e., outcome of due diligence)?
Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and Did you discuss with the subproject owner the clarified to the subproject owner all the applicable environmental and social safeguard requirements regarding the environmental and requirements and their implementation? social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or No concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: AGRO EXPORT BARAKA LLC Subproject location: Sirdarya region
Horticulture sector: Organizing greenhouse
Value of exposure (US$ ): 2 000 000,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, it was. ESMS coordinator confirmed that undertaken by your organization? the subproject owner is undertaking the obligation on compliance with all applicable environmental safeguard requirements, prescribed in ZVOS and conducted site visit and prepared site inspection report
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues During conducted monitoring on environmental associated with this subproject that were identified issues, daily household waste, and wastes through due diligence conducted by your from constructed modern greenhouse was organization, and how were the issues dealt with indicated and initiator of subproject owner was (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? instructed to organize special places for storing this wastes
Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and Did you discuss with the subproject owner the clarified to the subproject owner all the applicable environmental and social safeguard requirements regarding the environmental and requirements and their implementation? social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or No concerned stakeholder? Name of Subproject Company: UZUN MEVA SABZAVOT XOLODILNIK LLC
Subproject location: Surkhandarya region
Horticulture sector: Organizing cold storage
Value of exposure (US$ ): 185 000,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, it was. ESMS coordinator confirmed that undertaken by your organization? the subproject owner is undertaking the obligation on compliance with all applicable environmental safeguard requirements, prescribed in ZVOS and conducted site visit and prepared site inspection report.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues During conducted monitoring on environmental associated with this subproject that were identified issues, initiator of subproject was instructed to through due diligence conducted by your maintain cold storage engine in good condition organization, and how were the issues dealt with and set up containers for waste (i.e., outcome of due diligence)?
Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and Did you discuss with the subproject owner the clarified to the subproject owner all the applicable environmental and social safeguard requirements regarding the environmental and requirements and their implementation? social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or No concerned stakeholder? Name of Subproject Company: KOSONSOY SERHOSIL INTEVSIV BOGLARI LLC
Subproject location: Namangan region
Horticulture sector: Organizing intensive garden
Value of exposure (US$ ): 4 632 000,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, it was. ESMS coordinator confirmed that undertaken by your organization? the subproject owner is undertaking the obligation on compliance with all applicable environmental safeguard requirements, prescribed in ZVOS and conducted site visit and prepared site inspection report
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues associated with this subproject that were identified through due diligence conducted by your organization, and how were the issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due diligence)?
Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and Did you discuss with the subproject owner the clarified to the subproject owner all the applicable environmental and social safeguard requirements regarding the environmental and requirements and their implementation? social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or No concerned stakeholder? Name of Subproject Company: ALP JAVOKHIR JAVLONBEK LLC
Subproject location: Samarkand region
Horticulture sector: Organizing greenhouse
Value of exposure (US$ ): 1 000 000,0 Yes, it was. ESMS coordinator confirmed that the subproject owner is undertaking the Was any environmental and social due diligence obligation on compliance with all applicable undertaken by your organization? environmental safeguard requirements, prescribed in ZVOS and conducted site visit and prepared site inspection report
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues During conducted monitoring on environmental associated with this subproject that were identified issues, daily household waste, and wastes through due diligence conducted by your from constructed modern greenhouse was organization, and how were the issues dealt with indicated and initiator of subproject owner was (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? instructed to organize special places for storing this wastes
Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and Did you discuss with the subproject owner the clarified to the subproject owner all the applicable environmental and social safeguard requirements regarding the environmental and requirements and their implementation? social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or No concerned stakeholder? Name of Subproject Company: ISLOMBEK FIRDAVS AGRO LLC
Subproject location: Samarkand region
Horticulture sector: Organizing greenhouse
Value of exposure (US$ ): 326 705,0 Yes, it was. ESMS coordinator confirmed that the subproject owner is undertaking the Was any environmental and social due diligence obligation on compliance with all applicable undertaken by your organization? environmental safeguard requirements, prescribed in ZVOS and conducted site visit and prepared site inspection report
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues During conducted monitoring on environmental associated with this subproject that were identified issues, daily household waste, and wastes through due diligence conducted by your from constructed modern greenhouse was organization, and how were the issues dealt with indicated and initiator of subproject owner was (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? instructed to organize special places for storing this wastes
Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and Did you discuss with the subproject owner the clarified to the subproject owner all the applicable environmental and social safeguard requirements regarding the environmental and requirements and their implementation? social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project.
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements.
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or No concerned stakeholder?
ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
1. Please provide responses to the questions below. Please include additional sheets or attachments as required to provide details on questions that have been answered Yes. The Bank is required to submit the annual performance report to RRA.
Name of the Financial Institution JSCB “Turonbank”
Completed by (name): Abdurazakhov Alisher
Position in organization: Deputy of the Head of Division Date: 31.12.2018
A. Portfolio Information
Report Covering Period:
From: 01.12.2017 To: 31.12.2018
2. For the reporting period, please provide the following information about your portfolio where applicable: B. Business Lines
Product line Description Total exposure Average loan outstanding for (or transaction) most recent FY size end(thousand (thousand US$) US$)
Microfinance Loans or other financial products for individuals 29 099,0 2,5
Small Loans or other financial products for business individuals 5 861,9 6,9
Long term: Transactions with tenor greater than 12 months
Microfinance Any lending, leasing or other financial assistance to any corporate or legal entity other than an individual, with individual 20 092,9 11,1 transactions less than $50,000
Any lending, leasing or other financial assistance to any corporate or legal entity Small other than an individual, with individual 35 458,5 116,3 business transactions less than $300,000
Other
Other (if Factoring 158,1 26,3 applicable) Any crediting, leasing or other financial assistance to any corporate or legal entity, with the exception of an individual, with a 148 710,4 1 152,8 separate transaction amount of more than $ 300,000
Total 239 380,7 16,1
C. Exposure by Horticulture Sectors
3. Please provide an indicative percentage of total Innovation to horticulture modernization loan portfolio per subcomponents:
Industrial Sector % of Innovation to horticulture modernization loan portfolio (ADB)
For the purchase of agricultural machinery in the future, the cultivation of fruit and vegetable growing 50,0%
Acquisition of equipment for greenhouses 10,0% Purchase of equipment for a refrigerating household 2,9% Purchase of equipment for processing 37,1%
4. If engaged in long-term small business finance, please provide information on all loans with: (i) tenor longer than 12 months; and (ii) maximum $5 000 000 loan size.
Any Safeguard outstanding category environmenta Sub-
Value of l and IR and project Type of Tenor of exposure(th Industry IP issues using Name of Sub-project loanSME/tr loan(mon during ousand Sector ADB ade finance) ths) reporting US$) Env IR IP period and funds(ye actions taken s/no) to address the issues
"SКrbon Asl SКvНo" longtermcredit 72 440 horticulture B no no No Yes LLC TEKHCHORVASERVIS longtermcredit 84 564 horticulture B no no No Yes LLC SHURCHI MEBEL longtermcredit 60 98,6 horticulture В no no No Yes FE NUROBOD longtermcredit 60 185 horticulture B no no No Yes JV LLC EAST-WEST SURXON longtermcredit 84 312,4 horticulture B no no No Yes LLC AGROVER longtermcredit 120 5000 horticulture C no no No Yes LLC O'ZMATBAA TA'MINOT longtermcredit 120 3400 horticulture В no no No Yes Total 7 10 000
D. Environmental and Social Management System (ESMS)
REQUIREMENT: Policies & Processes Yes/No Has your organization developed and Being attached a copy of the ESMS to Yes implemented an ESMS? this report. If there is an ESMS already in place, have there been any updates to the ESMS or policy No and procedures adopted by your organization during the reporting period?
Has senior management signed off on the No updated policy/procedure?
Has your organization appointed staff tasked 2 ESMS managers and to implement the ESMS? Yes 18 ESMS managers from branches of the bank Please give details of any transactions rejected due to environmental and/or social No concerns.
Please state any difficulties and/or constraints Delivering reports on the ADB project Yes related to the implementation of the ESMS. in a foreign language
Please describe how you ensure that your On the basis of the loan agreement and in subproject companies and their subprojects accordance with the legislation of the are operated in compliance with the national Yes Republic of Uzbekistan, the borrower is lКws КnН rОРulКtТons КnН КpplТМКblО ADB’s obliged to fulfill all obligations to requirements. implement the current requirements for environmental protection measures Please give details of any material social and environmental issues associated with clients No during the reporting period.
In case the existing ESMS is not fully functional, what is the action plan being No implemented by your organization?
Capacity Yes/No Please provide the name and contact At all trainings conducted by RRA and information of the Environmental/Social Abdurazakhov ADB Officer or Coordinator who has the overall Alisher (tel: 202 01 responsibility for the implementation of the 01.internal:163) ESMS.
Please provide current staffing of other core Khamraev The Bank conducts training seminars for ESMS persons in the organization involved Sherzod (tel: branch specialists in each quarter of the 202 01 01 with ESMS implementation. internal.164) year.
What was the budget allocated to the ESMS The amount is insignificant, since the and its implementation during the year? ESMScoordinatorsare the current specialists of the branch of the bank Monitoring Yes/No Do you receive environmental and social Documents will be attached monitoring reports from subproject Yes companies that you finance? Do you check for ongoing compliance of your According to the legislation of the subproject companies with national regulation Republic of Uzbekistan, the and any other requirements? implementation of national standards Yes and any other environmental requirements is controlled by state bodies. The Bank monitors the project to implement their mitigation measures. Please describe how you monitor the The coordinator of the sub-project visits subproУОМt МompКnв КnН tСОТr subproУОМt’s to the place of projects for monitoring social and environmental performance. and on the basis of supporting documents, monitoring is carried out, the sub-project initiator fulfills all Yes obligations to implement the current requirements for environmental protection measures prescribed in the EIS and in the conclusion of the state environmental review.
Do you require the subproject owner to The initiator of the subproject submits to submit to you evidence of compliance with the Coordinator of the ESMS a required environmental and social approvals confirmation of compliance with the and permits for the subprojects. necessary environmental and social Yes approvals and permits, on the basis of which the coordinator of the ESMS monitors and provides the Manager of the ESMS for further reporting on ESMS.
Please provide details of any accidents/ litigation/complaints/regulatory notices and fines:
- Any incidents of non-compliance with the No applicable Environmental and Social Requirements - Covenants/conditionalities imposed by the Financial Institution to the subproject company as a result of any non-compliance
Reporting Yes/No Is there an internal process to report on social There is a department position that and environmental issues to senior oversees international credit lines. On management? the basis of the position, the manager of Yes the ESMS collects all project reports from the coordinators of the ESMS and provides the management of the bank quarterly.
Do you prepare any social and environmental JSCB social and No “TuronbКnk” reports: environmental reports are provided only - For other multilateral agencies - Other stakeholders by ADB - E&S reporting in the Report Sustainability reports
Activities on ADB’s Prohibited Investment Activities List If any, please indicate the dollar percentage of loans or investments out of your total outstanding exposure provided to clients who are substantially 0 % ТnvolvОН Тn ADB’s ProСТbТtОН InvОstmОnt Activities List (Refer to page 122 of SPS).
If the percentage is not zero, please explain these There is no credit that essentially falls under exposures and any steps that have been taken to the "List of prohibited types of investment reduce such exposure. activities" of ADB
E. Category “B” Subprojects Using ADB Funds
5. Please provide information about all new subprojects using ADB loan funding approved during this reporting period. Name of Subproject Company: "NUROBOD" Farmer’s household
Subproject location: Surkhandarya region, Shurchi district, Ibn-Sino, Surkhon street
Horticulture sector: The organization of a refrigerating capacity for 500 tons.
Value of exposure (US$ ): $ 185,000
Was any environmental and social due diligence Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried undertaken by your organization? out a check-out at the site of the site and on the basis of supporting documents an protective measures and an environmental management plan was developed.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review.
What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the through due diligence conducted by your project was instructed to take the waste to organization, and how were the issues dealt with specially remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)?
Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes applicable environmental and social safeguard requirements and their implementation?
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes government requirements? Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes safeguard requirements?
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or complaints No lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: Commercial firm of manufacturing “Shurchi Mebel” Subproject location: Surkhandarya region, Shurchi district, Mustahkillik-166 street.
Horticulture sector: The organization of a refrigerating capacity for 340 tons.
Value of exposure (US$ ): $ 98,600
Was any environmental and social due diligence Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried undertaken by your organization? out a check-out at the site of the site and on the basis of supporting documents on protective measures and an environmental management plan was developed.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review.
What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the through due diligence conducted by your project was instructed to take the waste to organization, and how were the issues dealt with specially remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)?
Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes applicable environmental and social safeguard requirements and their implementation?
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes government requirements?
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes safeguard requirements?
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or complaints No lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: “Sarbon asl savdo” LTD.
Subproject location: Bukhara region, Bukhara city, Otbozor
Horticulture sector: Organization of a greenhouse farm per hectare for growing agricultural products
Value of exposure (US$ ): $ 440,000
Was any environmental and social due diligence Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried undertaken by your organization? out a check-out at the site of the site and on the basis of supporting documents on protective measures and an environmental management plan was developed.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review.
What were the main environmental issues - Education of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the through due diligence conducted by your project was instructed to take the waste to organization, and how were the issues dealt with specially remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? - Storage of pesticides / herbicides. Organize a specially sheltered, protected and clearly marked place. Marking of boxes / bags / containers. Train staff in the handling, use, and disposal of pesticides
Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes applicable environmental and social safeguard requirements and their implementation?
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes government requirements?
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes safeguard requirements?
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or complaints No lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: “Texchorvaservis” LTD.
Subproject location: Khashkhandarya region, Kharshi city, Khudayzod street
Horticulture sector: Organization of a greenhouse farm per hectare for growing agricultural products
Value of exposure (US$ ): $ 564,000
Was any environmental and social due diligence Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried undertaken by your organization? out a check-out at the site of the site and on the basis of supporting documents on protective measures and an environmental management plan was developed.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review.
What were the main environmental issues - Education of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the through due diligence conducted by your project was instructed to take the waste to organization, and how were the issues dealt with specially remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? - Storage of pesticides / herbicides. Organize a specially sheltered, protected and clearly marked place. Marking of boxes / bags / containers. Train staff in the handling, use, and disposal of pesticides
Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes applicable environmental and social safeguard requirements and their implementation?
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes government requirements?
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes safeguard requirements?
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or complaints No lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: “UZMATBAA-TAMINOT” LTD.
Subproject location: Fergana region, Fergana city, the Kirguli street.
Horticulture sector: Organization of a greenhouse farm per hectare for growing agricultural products
Value of exposure (US$ ): $ 3,400,000
Was any environmental and social due diligence Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried undertaken by your organization? out a check-out at the site of the site and on the basis of supporting documents on protective measures and an environmental management plan was developed.
Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review.
What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the through due diligence conducted by your project was instructed to take the waste to organization, and how were the issues dealt with specially remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)?
Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes applicable environmental and social safeguard requirements and their implementation?
Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes government requirements?
Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes safeguard requirements?
Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No compliance or requests for corrective actions?
Have there been any grievances or complaints No lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
F. Sub-projects of the category “C” in which are used from ADB funds.
the The amount Initiator of The location of of Sub- The goal of The basis for classifying a sub-
№ the sub- Sub-project loan sub-project project into category "C" project (thousan d US $)
According to the ADB system, based Acquisition of on the requirements of protective Tashkent region, tractors and 1 “AGROVER 5 000 measures 1 (environment) Acquisition ” LTD. Zangiata district Other agricultural of tractors and Other agricultural machinery machinery is classified as category "C"
According to the ADB system, based Modernization of "EAST on the requirements of protective processing of WEST Tashkent region, measures 1 (environment) Canning 2 312 agricultural products SURXON" Yangiyul district industry (processing of raw materials With power LTD. <3000 tons / year) is classified as 1500 tons per year. category "C"
Appendix 7
ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
1. Please provide responses to the questions below. Please include additional sheets or attachments as required to provide details on questions that have been answered Yes. The Bank is required to submit the annual performance report to RRA.
Name of the Financial JSCB “Uzpromstroybank” Institution
Completed by (name): Ramazanov Lazizbek Ismailovich
Position in organization: Employee “Uzpromstroybank” Date: 31.12.2018
A. Portfolio Information
Report Covering Period:
From: 01.01.2018 To: 31.12.2018
2. For the reporting period, please provide the following information about your portfolio where applicable:
B. Business Lines
Total exposure Description outstanding for most Average loan (or Product line Loan or other types of financial products for recent transaction) size Microfinance individuals FY end (US$) (US$)
Loans or other financial products for Microfinance 187 209 320,6 218 963 141,4 individuals
Loans or other financial products for Small business 20 581 376,18 34 245 541,52 individuals
Long term: Transactions with tenor greater than 12 months Any lending, leasing or other financial assistance to any corporate or legal entity Microfinance 37 625 638,18 52 578 475,49 other than an individual, with individual transactions less than $50,000 Any lending, leasing or other financial assistance to any corporate or legal entity Small business 77 283 620,58 110 358 823,6 other than an individual, with individual transactions less than $300,000 Other
Other (if applicable) Please describe 2 865 020 604,0 2 893 847 452,0
C. Exposure by Horticulture Sectors
3. Please provide an indicative percentage of total Innovation to horticulture modernization loan portfolio per subcomponents:
Number of % of Innovation to horticulture Industrial Sector subprojects modernization loan portfolio
Purchase of refrigerators 9 45% Purchase of energy efficient greenhouses 8 40%
Number of % of Innovation to horticulture Industrial Sector subprojects modernization loan portfolio
Equipment for processing and packaging 3 15% Total 20 100%
{Note: Please attach environmental and social audit or due diligence reports and environmental and social monitoring reports for each Project Company, if available}
4. If engaged in long-term small business finance, please provide information on all loans with: (i) tenor longer than 12 months; and (ii) maximum $5 000 000 loan size.
Safeguard category Any outstanding environmental and IR and IP Subpro-ject Type of loan Tenor Value of issues during using ADB SME/ of loan Industry Name of Sub-project exposure reporting period funds Trade (months Sector* Env IR IP (US$) and actions finance ) taken to (yes/no) address the issues
Horticulture No Yes LLC "Emir Parranda" MSB 60 90 860,0 N/A (refrigerator) Horticulture MSB (processing of No Yes LLC "Khorazm Kovunlari" 60 957 528,65 N/A agricultural products) MSB Horticulture No Yes LLC "Sarkor Kuruvchi" 60 150 026,81 N/A (refrigerator) LLC "Zafarzhon Zhasur MSB Horticultural No Yes 84 2 000 000,0 N/A Navoiy" (greenhouse) MSB Horticultural No Yes LLC "Kogon Mega Trans" 84 440 000,0 N/A (greenhouse) MSB Horticulture No Yes LLC "Narpay Optimum" 84 710 200,00 N/A (refrigerator)
Safeguard category Any outstanding environmental and IR and IP Subpro-ject Type of loan Tenor Value of issues during using ADB SME/ of loan Industry Name of Sub-project exposure reporting period funds Trade (months Sector* Env IR IP (US$) and actions finance ) taken to (yes/no) address the issues
MSB Horticultural No Yes PE "Leader Best Tomato" 60 535 000,0 N/A (greenhouse) LLC "AR Logistics Vegetables MSB Horticultural No Yes 60 499 440,5 N/A Fruits" (greenhouse) MSB Horticultural No Yes LLC "Surkhon Kombinati" 84 1 500 000,0 N/A (greenhouse) Horticulture MSB (processing of No Yes LLC "Indigo Trade" 72 300 000,0 N/A agricultural products) MSB Horticulture No Yes LLC "Isroil Islom Hamkor" 60 295 845,77 N/A (refrigerator) MSB Horticultural No Yes LLC "Porloқ oston agrofТrmasТ" 60 513 930,0 B N/A (greenhouse) MSB Horticulture No Yes LLC “Express TermТnal Savdo” 60 256 870,0 B N/A (refrigerator) Horticulture MSB (processing of No Yes LLC “Urgut MarvarТdТ” 36 98 430,0 B N/A agricultural products) MSB Horticulture No Yes PE "Asliddin Abduholik 2005" 60 450 000,0 B N/A (refrigerator) MSB Horticulture No Yes LLC “KТtob Agroplast” 60 390 585,0 B N/A (refrigerator)
MSB Horticulture No Yes LLC “KТtob TeСavtomatТka” 48 150 000,0 B N/A (refrigerator)
Safeguard category Any outstanding environmental and IR and IP Subpro-ject Type of loan Tenor Value of issues during using ADB SME/ of loan Industry Name of Sub-project exposure reporting period funds Trade (months Sector* Env IR IP (US$) and actions finance ) taken to (yes/no) address the issues
MSB 4 215 199,4 Horticultural No Yes LLC “Karmana AgrotradТng” 120 B N/A 7 (greenhouse)
MSB Horticultural No Yes LLC “AvtomobТlcСТ” 84 976 000,0 B N/A (greenhouse) MSB Horticulture No Yes ООО "DТamond Travel" 60 498 750,0 B N/A (refrigerator) *Please use the sectors listed in the earlier table or any standard classification. Note: Env = Environment, IR = Involuntary Resettlement, IP = Indigenous Peoples.
D. Environmental and Social Management System (ESMS)
5. REQUIREMENT: (1) FOR EXISTING SUBPROJECTS: ATTACHMENTS OF MONITORING REPORTS OR REPORT ON DISCHARGE PERMITS; AND (2) FOR NEWLY APPROVED SUBPROJECTS: ATTACHMENTS OF ZVOS APPROVAL.
Policies & Processes Yes/No Has your organization developed and implemented Yes Copy is attached an ESMS? If there is an ESMS already in place, have there been any updates to the ESMS or policy and No - procedures adopted by your organization during the reporting period? Has senior management signed off on the updated No -
policy/procedure? Director of the Small Business Lending Department B.Mullazhanov is responsible for implementation of policy on Environmental and Social Risks of the Bank. Has your organization appointed staff tasked to Yes Head of the of the Small Business Lending Department D. implement the ESMS? Shamirzaev is responsible for process of implementiong Environmental and Social Risks for the realization of project “Development of tСe value cСaТn of tСe СortТculture” Please give details of any transactions rejected No - due to environmental and/or social concerns. Please state any difficulties and/or constraints In rare cases, it is difficult to determine which category of related to the implementation of the ESMS. environmental risk relates to project Please describe how you ensure that your Work of the company, our leading sub-projects and their subproject companies and their subprojects are sub-projects provided according to ESMS responding to the operated in compliance with the national laws and requirements of the national law, also laws established by regulatТons and applТcable ADB’s requТrements. ADB. Please give details of any material social and environmental issues associated with clients during Not occured the reporting period. In case the existing ESMS is not fully functional, what is the action plan being implemented by your Active ESMS is considered as totally functional organization? Capacity Yes/No Please provide the name and contact information Head of the of the Small Business Lending Department of the Environmental/Social Officer or Coordinator Yes D.Shamirzaev. who has the overall responsibility for the Call:+998(71) 120-35-85, [email protected] implementation of the ESMS.
Please provide current staffing of other core ESMS Director of the Small Business Lending Department B. persons in the organization involved with ESMS Yes Mullazhanov implementation. Call:+998(71)120-45-64
Wages for employee’s salarТes partТcТpatТng Тn realТzatТon of What was the budget allocated to the ESMS and No ESMS. Other expenses are subject to payment by reason of its implementation during the year? necessity Monitoring Yes/No Do you receive environmental and social TСe monТtorТng Тs carrТed out by tСe employees of tСe Bank’s monitoring reports from subproject companies that No branches who financed the project jointly withthe project you finance? initiator Verification of implementation of activities are checked during the monitoring process which is provided in the control board of environment, this way it is checked the Do you check for ongoing compliance of your fulfillment of national norms and requirementsof ADB. subproject companies with national regulation and Yes Besides that, according to the current law subdivisions of the any other requirements? Committee of Ecology and Environmental protection monitor the control over the fulfillment of the requirementsof the state expert opinion. Please describe how you monitor the subproject In practise, the Bank will monitor environmental and social company and tСeТr subproject’s socТal and No impacts on which to be completelly delivered equipment environmental performance. Do you require the subproject owner to submit to Monitoring of employees at the exit is obliged to check the you evidence of compliance with required Yes implementation of mitigation measuresspecified in the environmental and social approvals and permits for payment of environmental management the subprojects. Please provide details of any accidents/ litigation/complaints/regulatory notices and fines: No - Any incidents of non-compliance with the applicable Environmental and Social
Requirements - Covenants/conditionalities imposed by the Financial Institution to the subproject company as a result of any non-compliance Reporting Yes/No According to adopted ESMS, based on results of monitoring if it is revealed that the borrower does not meet the Is there an internal process to report on social and requirements for compliance with protective measures to environmental issues to senior management? protect environment, employees are obliged to inform about it to the manager of ESMS for accepting applicable measures Do you prepare any social and environmental reports: - For other multilateral agencies No For ADB - Other stakeholders - E&S reporting in the Report Sustainability reports
Activities on ADB’s Prohibited Investment Activities List If any, please indicate the dollar percentage of loans or investments out of your total outstanding exposure provided to Not available clТents wСo are substantТally Тnvolved Тn ADB’s ProСТbТted Investment Activities List (Refer to page 122 of SPS).
If the percentage is not zero, please explain these exposures and any steps that have been taken to reduce such exposure.
E. Category “B” Subprojects Using ADB Funds
The Bank was not funding the projects category "b" at the expense of the ADB.
E. Category «В», Subprojects using ADB Funds
6. Please provide information about all new subprojects using ADB loan approved during this reporting period
Name of Subproject Company: LLC “Porloq ostona Agrofirmasi” Subproject location: Khorezm region, Yangiriq district Horticulture sector: Greenhouse Value of exposure (US$ ): 513 930,0 US Dollars Was any environmental and social due Yes, particularly there were undertaken preliminary analyses of diligence undertaken by your organization? environmental impact (ecological screening), social safeguards screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or Yes, documents on this sub subproject, such as Project of audit reports reviewed by your ZVOS (environmental assessment report) and Conclusion of organization? State Ecological Expertise under the State Committee on Ecology and Environmental Protection, were inspected by credit expert and ESMS coordinator What were the main environmental issues By the result of inspection of this subproject it is revealed that associated with this subproject that were there will be generated industrial and consumption waste, which identified through due diligence conducted are formed within a year, such as waste of a top of vegetables, by your organization, and how were the waste of the used polyethylene film, waste of the rejected boxes, issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due waste of worn-out bags, fluorescent lamps. As the technology of diligence)? energy and resource effТcТent greenСouse doesn’t Тmply plantТng of seedlings into the ground and implies the use of hydroponics, there will be no pollution of soil and cultivation of land. The greenhouse will be operated with natural gas, which can help to avoid emission of air polluting substances in large volumes. As this environment-friendly technology is designated to save resources, chemical fertilizers will be used in limited volumes through a drip irrigation system, which also saves water resources provided from the planned artesian well. Also short-term influence in the atmosphere of inorganic dust when carrying out construction works of an object is expected, the subproject has provided dust suppression of the working platform.
For each type of waste the place and conditions for temporary storage at the site territories as well as further movement of waste have been determined. In particular, consumption residual shall be submitted to specialized enterprises for utilization. Used mercury lamps shall be submitted to specialized companies for demercuration. Did you discuss with the subproject owner Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and clarified to the the applicable environmental and social subproject owner all the requirements regarding the safeguard requirements and their environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply implementation? with during the implementation of sub subproject. Does the subproject comply with Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive Conclusion of applicable government requirements? State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with Yes, according to the results of preliminary analyzes, screening applicable ADB safeguard requirements? and safeguard due diligence this subproject complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of No, there were no incidents of non-compliance observed. non-compliance or requests for corrective actions? Have there been any grievances or No, by this time there were no complaints received. complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: "Express Terminal Savdo" LLC Subproject location: Ferghana region, Kuvasay district Horticulture sector: Organization of cold storage Value of exposure (US$ ): 256 870,0 US Dollars Was any environmental and social Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried out a check-out of the due diligence undertaken by your site and on the basis of supporting documents on protective measures organization? and environmental management plan was developed.
Any environmental assessment Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the conclusions of the state report or audit reports reviewed by environmental review. your organization? What were the main Formation of construction, household, economic, food waste. The environmental issues associated initiator of the project was instructed to dispose the waste to specially with this subproject that were remote places. identified through due diligence conducted by your organization, and how were the issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and clarified to the subproject owner the applicable subproject owner all the requirements regarding the environmental environmental and social and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the safeguard requirements and their implementation of project. implementation? Does the subproject comply with Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive Conclusion of State applicable government Ecological Expertise. requirements? Does the subproject comply with Yes, according to the results of preliminary analyzes, screening and applicable ADB safeguard safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements? requirements. Have there been any recorded No, there were no incidents of non-compliance observed. incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions? Have there been any grievances No, by this time there were no complaints received. or complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person
or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: "Urgut marvaridi" LLC Subproject location: Samarkand region, Urgut district Horticulture sector: Drying fruits and vegetables Value of exposure (US$ ): 98 430,0 US Dollars Was any environmental and social Yes, particularly there were undertaken preliminary analysis of due diligence undertaken by your environmental impact (ecological screening), social safeguards organization? screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment Yes, documents on this project, such as Projetc of ZVOS (environmental report or audit reports reviewed by assessment report) and Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise under your organization? the State Committee on Ecology and Environmental Protection, were inspected by credit expert and ESMS coordinator What were the main During the conduction of screening and due diligence, main issues environmental issues associated studied were generation of production waste and waste water, as the with this subproject that were technological process itself means use of much water and generation of identified through due diligence food wastes, namely it contains such procedures as washing, cleaning, conducted by your organization, polishing, sorting, dehydration and others. Therefore, it may lead to a and how were the issues dealt generation of wastewater, which will be discharged to the central sewage with (i.e., outcome of due system, with the subsequent dumping into the city sewerage. Water will diligence)? be taken from central water supply system. Production waste, formed at primary sink of raw materials, after cleaning in a horizontal settler will go to sewer chains of the enterprise with the subsequent dumping into the city sewerage. As no construction works are planned, there will not occur construction waste. However, as a result of production operations there will be generated solid and household wastes, which ought to be collected and disposed to the special landfill. Food waste generated is planned to be utilized for cattle feed. Did you discuss with the Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and clarified to the subproject owner the applicable subproject owner all the requirements regarding the environmental and environmental and social social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the safeguard requirements and their implementation of project. implementation? Does the subproject comply with Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive Conclusion of State applicable government Ecological Expertise. requirements? Does the subproject comply with Yes, according to the results of preliminary analyzes, screening and applicable ADB safeguard safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements? requirements. Have there been any recorded No, there were no incidents of non-compliance observed. incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions? Have there been any grievances No, by this time there were no complaints received. or complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: "Asliddin Abduxoliq" LLC Subproject location: Surkhandarya region, Denov district Horticulture sector: Organization of cold storage Value of exposure (US$ ): 450 000,0 US Dollars Was any environmental and social Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried out a check-out due diligence undertaken by your of the site and on the basis of supporting documents on organization? protective measures and environmental management plan was developed. Any environmental assessment Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the conclusions of the report or audit reports reviewed by state environmental review. your organization? What were the main Formation of construction, household, economic, food waste. environmental issues associated The initiator of the project was instructed to dispose the waste with this subproject that were to specially remote places. identified through due diligence conducted by your organization, and how were the issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and clarified to the subproject owner the applicable subproject owner all the requirements regarding the environmental and social environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply safeguard requirements and their with during the implementation of project. implementation? Does the subproject comply with Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive Conclusion of applicable government State Ecological Expertise. requirements? Does the subproject comply with Yes, according to the results of preliminary analyzes, screening applicable ADB safeguard and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB requirements? safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded No, there were no incidents of non-compliance observed. incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions? Have there been any grievances No, by this time there were no complaints received. or complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: "Kitob Agroplast" LLC Subproject location: Kashkadarya region, Kitab district Horticulture sector: Organization of cold storage Value of exposure (US$ ): 390 585,0 US Dollars Was any environmental and social Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried out a check- due diligence undertaken by your out of the site and on the basis of supporting documents on organization? protective measures and environmental management plan was developed. Any environmental assessment Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the conclusions of report or audit reports reviewed by the state environmental review. your organization? What were the main Formation of construction, household, economic, food waste. environmental issues associated The initiator of the project was instructed to dispose the with this subproject that were waste to specially remote places. identified through due diligence conducted by your organization, and how were the issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and clarified to subproject owner the applicable the subproject owner all the requirements regarding the environmental and social environmental and social safeguard that him/she should safeguard requirements and their comply with during the implementation of project. implementation? Does the subproject comply with Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive Conclusion of applicable government State Ecological Expertise. requirements? Does the subproject comply with Yes, according to the results of preliminary analyzes, applicable ADB safeguard screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies requirements? with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded No, there were no incidents of non-compliance observed. incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions? Have there been any grievances No, by this time there were no complaints received. or complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: "Kitob Texavtomatika" LLC Subproject location: Kashkadarya region, Kitab district Horticulture sector: Organization of cold storage Value of exposure (US$ ): 150 000,0 US Dollars Was any environmental and social Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried out a check- due diligence undertaken by your out of the site and on the basis of supporting documents on organization? protective measures and environmental management plan was developed. Any environmental assessment Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the conclusions of the report or audit reports reviewed by state environmental review. your organization? What were the main Formation of construction, household, economic, food waste. environmental issues associated The initiator of the project was instructed to dispose the waste with this subproject that were to specially remote places. identified through due diligence conducted by your organization, and how were the issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and clarified to the subproject owner the applicable subproject owner all the requirements regarding the environmental and social environmental and social safeguard that him/she should safeguard requirements and their comply with during the implementation of project. implementation? Does the subproject comply with Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive Conclusion of applicable government State Ecological Expertise. requirements? Does the subproject comply with Yes, according to the results of preliminary analyzes, applicable ADB safeguard screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies requirements? with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded No, there were no incidents of non-compliance observed.
incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions? Have there been any grievances No, by this time there were no complaints received. or complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC “Karmana Agrotrading” Subproject location: Navoi region Karmana district Horticulture sector: Greenhouse Value of exposure (US$ ): 4 215 199,47 US Dollars Was any environmental and social due Yes, particularly there were undertaken preliminary diligence undertaken by your organization? analyses of environmental impact (ecological screening), social safeguards screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or Yes, documents on this sub subproject, such as Project audit reports reviewed by your of ZVOS (environmental assessment report) and organization? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise under the State Committee on Ecology and Environmental Protection, were inspected by credit expert and ESMS coordinator What were the main environmental issues By the result of inspection of this subproject it is revealed associated with this subproject that were that there will be generated industrial and consumption identified through due diligence conducted waste, which are formed within a year, such as waste of by your organization, and how were the a top of vegetables, waste of the used polyethylene film, issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due waste of the rejected boxes, waste of worn-out bags, diligence)? fluorescent lamps. As the technology of energy and resource efficient greenhouse doesn’t imply planting of
seedlings into the ground and implies the use of hydroponics, there will be no pollution of soil and cultivation of land. The greenhouse will be operated with natural gas, which can help to avoid emission of air polluting substances in large volumes. As this environment-friendly technology is designated to save resources, chemical fertilizers will be used in limited volumes through a drip irrigation system, which also saves water resources provided from the planned artesian well. Also short-term influence in the atmosphere of inorganic dust when carrying out construction works of an object is expected, the subproject has provided dust suppression of the working platform.
For each type of waste the place and conditions for temporary storage at the site territories as well as further movement of waste have been determined. In particular, consumption residual shall be submitted to specialized enterprises for utilization. Used mercury lamps shall be submitted to specialized companies for demercuration. Did you discuss with the subproject owner Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and clarified the applicable environmental and social to the subproject owner all the requirements regarding safeguard requirements and their the environmental and social safeguard that him/she implementation? should comply with during the implementation of sub subproject. Does the subproject comply with Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive applicable government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with Yes, according to the results of preliminary analyzes, applicable ADB safeguard requirements? screening and safeguard due diligence this subproject complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of No, there were no incidents of non-compliance non-compliance or requests for corrective observed. actions? Have there been any grievances or No, by this time there were no complaints received. complaints lodged on the subproject by
any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC “Avtomobilchi” Subproject location: Kashkadarya region, Chirakchi district Horticulture sector: Greenhouse Value of exposure (US$ ): 976 000,0 US Dollars Was any environmental and social due Yes, particularly there were undertaken preliminary analyses diligence undertaken by your organization? of environmental impact (ecological screening), social
safeguards screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or Yes, documents on this sub subproject, such as Project of audit reports reviewed by your ZVOS (environmental assessment report) and Conclusion of organization? State Ecological Expertise under the State Committee on Ecology and Environmental Protection, were inspected by credit expert and ESMS coordinator What were the main environmental issues By the result of inspection of this subproject it is revealed that associated with this subproject that were there will be generated industrial and consumption waste, identified through due diligence conducted which are formed within a year, such as waste of a top of by your organization, and how were the vegetables, waste of the used polyethylene film, waste of the issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due rejected boxes, waste of worn-out bags, fluorescent lamps. As diligence)? the technology of energy and resource efficient greenhouse doesn’t imply planting of seedlings into the ground and implies the use of hydroponics, there will be no pollution of soil and cultivation of land. The greenhouse will be operated with natural gas, which can help to avoid emission of air polluting substances in large volumes. As this environment-friendly technology is designated to save resources, chemical fertilizers will be used in limited volumes through a drip irrigation system, which also saves water resources provided from the planned artesian well. Also short-term influence in the atmosphere of inorganic dust when carrying out construction works of an object is expected, the subproject has provided dust suppression of the working platform.
For each type of waste the place and conditions for temporary storage at the site territories as well as further movement of waste have been determined. In particular, consumption residual shall be submitted to specialized enterprises for utilization. Used mercury lamps shall be submitted to specialized companies for demercuration. Did you discuss with the subproject owner Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and clarified to the the applicable environmental and social subproject owner all the requirements regarding the safeguard requirements and their environmental and social safeguard that him/she should implementation? comply with during the implementation of sub subproject. Does the subproject comply with Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive Conclusion of applicable government requirements? State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with Yes, according to the results of preliminary analyzes, applicable ADB safeguard requirements? screening and safeguard due diligence this subproject complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of No, there were no incidents of non-compliance observed. non-compliance or requests for corrective actions? Have there been any grievances or No, by this time there were no complaints received. complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: "Diamond Travel" LLC Subproject location: Fergana region, Margilan district Horticulture sector: Organization of cold storage Value of exposure (US$ ): 498 750,0 US Dollars Was any environmental and social Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried out a check-out of the site and on due diligence undertaken by your the basis of supporting documents on protective measures and environmental organization? management plan was developed.
Any environmental assessment Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the conclusions of the state report or audit reports reviewed by environmental review. your organization? What were the main Formation of construction, household, economic, food waste. The initiator of the environmental issues associated project was instructed to dispose the waste to specially remote places. with this subproject that were identified through due diligence conducted by your organization, and how were the issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and clarified to the subproject owner subproject owner the applicable all the requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that environmental and social him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. safeguard requirements and their implementation? Does the subproject comply with Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive Conclusion of State Ecological applicable government Expertise. requirements? Does the subproject comply with Yes, according to the results of preliminary analyzes, screening and safeguard applicable ADB safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. requirements?
Have there been any recorded No, there were no incidents of non-compliance observed. incidents of non-compliance or requests for corrective actions? Have there been any grievances No, by this time there were no complaints received. or complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or concerned stakeholder? ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
1. Please provide responses to the questions below. Please include additional sheets or attachments as required to provide details on questions that have been answered Yes. The Bank is required to submit the annual performance report to RRA.
Name of the Financial JSCB “Asaka bank” Institution Completed by (name): Mamadjanov Bunyod Position in organization: Head of Division Date: 31.12.2017
A. Portfolio Information
Report Covering Period: From: 01.01.2018 To: 31.12.2018
2. For the reporting period, please provide the following information about your portfolio where applicable:
B. Business Lines
Total exposure Average loan (or outstanding for most Product line Description transaction) size recent FY (thousand US$) end(thousand US$)
Loans or other financial products for Microfinance 177 265 930,31 2 785,36 individuals Loans or other financial products for Small business 6 508 358,13 8 563,63 individuals Long term: Transactions with tenor greater than 12 months Any lending, leasing or other financial
assistance to any corporate or legal Microfinance 48 701 657,85 12 577,9 entity other than an individual, with individual transactions less than $50,000 Any lending, leasing or other financial assistance to any corporate or legal Small business entity other than an individual, with 155 976 785,18 32 851,05 individual transactions less than $300,000 Other Factoring Any crediting, leasing or other financial Other (if assistance to any corporate or legal applicable) entity, with the exception of an individual, with a separate transaction amount of more than $ 300,000
C. Exposure by Horticulture Sectors
3. Please provide an indicative percentage of total Innovation to horticulture modernization loan portfolio per subcomponents: % Horticulture Value Chain Develoment Industrial Sector Project Portfolio Intensivegarden 3% Moderngreenhousecomplex 17% Cold storages 64% Equipment for processing of agriculture products 17%
4. If engaged in long-term small business finance, please provide information on all loans with: (i) tenor longer than 12 months; and (ii) maximum $5000000 loan size. (Sub-project using ADB funds)
Any Safeguard outstanding category environment Value al and IR Tenor of and IP Sub-project Type of of exposu issues using ADB Name of Sub-project loanSME/tra Industry Sector during loan(m re(thou funds(yes/no de finance) Env IR IP reporting onths) sand period and ) US$) actions taken to address the issues LLC «MangТt Invest longtermcredit 60 477,0 Greenhouse C N/A no yes Plys» Driedagriculturalpr PE «Poytug' Barkamol longtermcredit 84 494,2 C N/A no yes QurТlТsС» oducts LLC «Barkamol Avlod Driedagriculturalpr longtermcredit 84 446,4 C N/A no yes QalqonТ» oducts Driedagriculturalpr LLC «AslMevaInvest» longtermcredit 84 100,0 oducts C N/A no yes PE «Bunyod servТs Driedagriculturalpr longtermcredit 84 650,0 C N/A no yes lyuks» oducts LCC «Sabo Hamkor» longtermcredit 60 1 314,39 Greenhouse C N/A no yes
«AndТjon export and Driedagriculturalpr import business longtermcredit 60 316,4 C N/A no yes oducts solutТons»
LLC«JondorQurТlТsСInve longtermcredit 60 1 998,8 Greenhouse C N/A no yes st» LLC«EltekEksklyuzТv» longtermcredit 60 450,0 Greenhouse C N/A no yes Farm EnreprТse«UktamBuston longtermcredit 84 450,0 Greenhouse C N/A no yes SaxovatТ» The production of LLC«Gala RТver» longtermcredit 60 1 082,8 concentrated C N/A no yes grape juice LLC«Grand BukСara longtermcredit 84 2 000,0 Greenhouse C N/A no yes agro»
LLC«Kongres Baraka longtermcredit 250,0 Greenhouse C N/A no yes Agro» 60 LLC«Mo’jТzaagroservТce longtermcredit 60 960,0 Greenhouse C N/A no yes »
LLC«Kelajakta’mТrsavdo longtermcredit 60 180,0 Greenhouse C N/A no yes servТce» Driedagriculturalpr «BotТrIsaev» Farm longtermcredit 60 275,5 C N/A no yes Enterpise oducts
LLC«AppleUnТversalSer longtermcredit 84 700,0 Greenhouse C N/A no yes vТce» «OcСТlovJavoxТrUzum longtermcredit 60 386,0 Greenhouse C N/A no yes Bog» Farm Enterpise
LLC «Samarkand TemТr longtermcredit 60 539,4 Greenhouse C N/A no yes Beton KonstruktsТya» Driedagriculturalpr «Urgut Elektro ServТce» longtermcredit 84 225,6 C N/A no yes Farm Enterpise oducts
LLC«SСoСjaСonBoburBo longtermcredit 60 580,0 Greenhouse C N/A no yes glarТ» Driedagriculturalpr «IntensТv gold fruТt» longtermcredit 84 1 179,6 C N/A no yes Farm Enterpise oducts PE longtermcredit 60 4 900,0 Greenhouse C N/A no yes LLC«SТrdarТnskТyBereg» LLC«MТrzaobodUnТversa longtermcredit 60 4 900,0 Greenhouse C N/A no yes lTrade» LLC«БojТBoСodТrСonota» longtermcredit 84 1 000,0 Greenhouse C N/A no yes Driedagriculturalpr longtermcredit 60 325,0 C N/A no yes LLC«NuluFayzImkon» oducts Driedagriculturalpr «SurСon obТ Сayot» longtermcredit 84 5 000,0 C N/A no yes Farm Enterpise oducts
«EzgulТk SarТ Agro» longtermcredit 60 1 970,0 Greenhouse C N/A no yes Farm Enterpise LLC«RТvMakon» longtermcredit 60 449,5 Intensive garden C N/A no yes Driedagriculturalpr longtermcredit 60 493,0 C N/A no yes LLC«MuСPlast ServТce» oducts Family enterprise Driedagriculturalpr longtermcredit 60 150,0 C N/A no yes «NodТraDТyorMevalarТ» oducts Driedagriculturalpr longtermcredit 84 3 167,9 C N/A no yes LLC«ГТmnТy Sad» oducts LLC«CСodakSardor farm Driedagriculturalpr longtermcredit 60 390,0 C N/A no yes servТs» oducts Driedagriculturalpr longtermcredit 60 118,0 C N/A no yes LLC«ВozavonMarvarТdТ» oducts LLC«AlТ KusСcСТ Agro longtermcredit 60 1 092,8 Greenhouse C N/A no yes export» LLC«SagAgro» longtermcredit 120 4 750,0 Intensivegarden C N/A no yes LLC«SagAgroBulung'ur» longtermcredit 120 1 924,0 Intensivegarden C N/A no yes
D. Environmental and Social Management System (ESMS)Requirement:
Policies & Processes Yes/No Has your organization developed and Being attached a copy of the ESMS to this Yes implemented an ESMS? report. If there is an ESMS already in place, have there been any updates to the ESMS or policy No and procedures adopted by your organization during the reporting period? Has senior management signed off on the No updated policy/procedure?
Has your organization appointed staff tasked 26 ESMScoordinators from branches of the Yes to implement the ESMS? bank
Please give details of any transactions rejected due to environmental and/or social No concerns. Please state any difficulties and/or constraints Delivering reports on the ADB project in Yes related to the implementation of the ESMS. english language On the basis of the loan agreement and in Please describe how you ensure that your accordance with the legislation of the subproject companies and their subprojects Republic of Uzbekistan, the borrower is Yes are operated in compliance with the national obliged to fulfill all obligations to implement laws and regulatТons and applТcable ADB’s the current requirements for environmental requirements. protection measures Please give details of any material social and environmental issues associated with clients No during the reporting period. In case the existing ESMS is not fully functional, what is the action plan being No implemented by your organization? Capacity Yes/No Please provide the name and contact information of the Environmental/Social Officer or Coordinator who has the overall Yes Head of Project Finance Department: responsibility for the implementation of the Mamadjanov B; ESMS. Manager of Division of Project Finance Department: Abdukahharov V.
Please provide current staffing of other core Yes Manager of the unit of Project Finance ESMS persons in the organization involved Department: Xajiyev J with ESMS implementation. What was the budget allocated to the ESMS ESMScoordinatorsare the current specialists and its implementation during the year? of the branch of the bank Monitoring Yes/No Do you receive environmental and social monitoring reports from subproject companies After having been financed the project, that you finance? environmental and social issues are presented in a monitored way due to the Annex 6 of the ESMS Procedures for the ADB Loan 3471-Uzb "Horticulture Value Chain Yes Development Project". Monitoring is completed according to the provided list of questions. Besides that, the Bank's monitoring officer checks the implementation of the Environmental Management Plan of the project.
According to the legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan, the implementation of national Do you check for ongoing compliance of your standards and any other environmental Yes subproject companies with national regulation requirements is controlled by state bodies. and any other requirements? The Bank monitors the project to implement their mitigation measures.
Thecoordinator of the sub-project monitors fills appendix 6,and on the basis of supporting Please describe how you monitor the documents, monitoring is carried out, the sub- subproject company and tСeТr subproject’s Yes project initiator fulfills all obligations to social and environmental performance. implement the current requirements for environmental protection measures prescribed in the EIS and in the conclusion of the state environmental review.
The initiator of the subproject submits to the Do you require the subproject owner to submit Coordinator of the ESMS a confirmation of to you evidence of compliance with required compliance with the necessary environmental Yes environmental and social approvals and and social approvals and permits, on the permits for the subprojects. basis of which the coordinator of the ESMS monitors and provides the Manager of the ESMS for further reporting on ESMS. Please provide details of any accidents/ litigation/complaints/regulatory notices and fines: - Any incidents of non-compliance with the applicable Environmental and Social No Requirements - Covenants/conditionalities imposed by the Financial Institution to the subproject company as a result of any non-compliance Reporting Yes/No Is there an internal process to report on social Due to the adopted procedure, based on the and environmental issues to senior results of the monitoring if the the management? requirements for compliance with Yes environmental protection measures were failed by the borrowers, manager of the ESMS collects all project reports from the coordinators of the ESMS and provides the management of the bank quarterly
Do you prepare any social and environmental reports: Social and environmental reports are - For other multilateral agencies provided only to ADB No - Other stakeholders - E&S reporting in the Report Sustainability reports
Activities on ADB’s Prohibited Investment Activities List
If any, please indicate the dollar percentage of loans or investments out of your total outstanding exposure provided to clients who are substantially involved in 0 % ADB’s ProСТbТted Investment ActТvТtТes LТst (Refer to page 122 of SPS). If the percentage is not zero, please explain these There is no credit that essentially falls under the exposures and any steps that have been taken to "List of prohibited types of investment activities" of reduce such exposure. ADB E. Category “B” Subprojects Using ADB Funds
5. Please provide information about all new subprojects using ADB loan funding approved during this reporting period. Name of Subproject Company: LLC«MangТtInvestPlys» Subproject location: Republic of Karakalpak, Mangit city,Amudarya district, Samarkand street 24 Horticulture sector: Organization of a greenhouse farm for growing agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): $ 477 000,0 Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried Was any environmental and social due diligence out particular preliminary analysis and on the undertaken by your organization? basis of supporting documents on protective measures and an environmental management plan was developed. Any environmental assessment report or audit reports Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review.
What were the main environmental issues associated This project falls under the category 3, according with this subproject that were identified through due to the Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise diligence conducted by your organization, and how and in compliance with Decree of Cabinet of
were the issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due MТnТsters №491 dated 31/12/2001. By the result of inspection of this project it is diligence)? revealed that there will be generated industrial and consumption waste, which are formed within a year, such as waste of tops of vegetables, waste of the used polyethylene film, waste of the rejected boxes, waste of worn-out bags, fluorescent lamps. As the technology of energy and resource effТcТent greenСouse doesn’t Тmply planting of seedlings into the ground and implies the use of hydroponics, there will be no pollution of soil and cultivation of land. The greenhouse will be operated with natural gas, which can help to avoid emission of air polluting substances in large volumes. As this environment-friendly technology is designated to save resources, chemical fertilizers will be used in limited volumes through a drip irrigation system, which also saves water resources provided from the planned artesian well. Also short-term influence in the atmosphere of inorganic dust when carrying out construction works of an object is expected, the project has provided dust suppression of the working platform. For each type of waste the place and conditions for temporary storage at the site territory as well as further movement of waste has been determined. In particular, consumption residual shall be submitted to specialized enterprises for utilization. Used mercury lamps shall be submitted to specialized companies for demercuration Did you discuss with the subproject owner the applicable environmental and social safeguard Yes.Bank specialists discussed, explained and requirements and their implementation? clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints lodged No by this time there were no complaints on the subproject by any affected person or concerned received. stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC «Poytug' Barkamol QurТlТsС» Subproject location: Andijan cityNavoiy street 46 Horticulture sector: Organization of drying of agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): $ 494 211,0 Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried Was any environmental and social due diligence out a check-out at the site of the site and on the undertaken by your organization? basis of supporting documents on protective measures and an environmental management plan was developed. Any environmental assessment report or audit reports Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues associated Producing of construction and household waste. with this subproject that were identified through due The initiator of the project was instructed to take diligence conducted by your organization, and how the waste to specially remote places were the issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due The main waste is produced by the procedures diligence)? as washing, cleaning, polishing, sorting, dehydration and others. Therefore, it may lead to a generation of wastewater, which will be discharged to the central sewage system, with the subsequent dumping into the region sewerage. Production operations can cause appearing generated solid and household wastes, which ought to be collected and disposed to the special landfill. Food waste generated is planned to be utilized for cattle feed. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard presented the clarification to the subproject requirements and their implementation? owner all the requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard in order to accomplish during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints lodged No, by this time there were no complaints on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC «Barkamol Avlod QalqonТ» Subproject location: Region of AndijanAsaka district М Yangiobod Horticulture sector: Organization of drying of agricultural products with annual capacity of 1800tonness Value of exposure (US$ ): 446 400,0 Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried Was any environmental and social due diligence out a check-out at the site of the site and on the undertaken by your organization? basis of supporting documents on protective measures and an environmental management plan was developed. Any environmental assessment report or audit reports Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues associated - Producing of construction and household with this subproject that were identified through due waste. The initiator of the project was instructed diligence conducted by your organization, and how to take the waste to specially remote places were the issues dealt with (i.e., outcome of due The main waste is produced by the procedures diligence)? as washing, cleaning, polishing, sorting, dehydration and others. Therefore, it may lead to a generation of wastewater, which will be discharged to the central sewage system, with the subsequent dumping into the region sewerage. Production operations can cause appearing generated solid and household wastes, which ought to be collected and disposed to the special landfill. Food waste generated is planned to be utilized for cattle feed. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard presented the clarification to the subproject requirements and their implementation? owner all the requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard in order to accomplish during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes,it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes,according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No,there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints lodged No,by this time there were no complaints on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC «Asl Meva Invest » Subproject location: Region of AndijanBo'z districtA.Ikramov street Horticulture sector: Organization of drying of agricultural products with annual capacity of 400tonnes Value of exposure (US$ ): 100 000,0 Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried out a check-out at the site of the site and on the Was any environmental and social due diligence basis of supporting documents on protective undertaken by your organization? measures and an environmental management plan was developed. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues - Producing of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the project through due diligence conducted by your was instructed to take the waste to specially organization, and how were the issues dealt with remote places. The main waste is produced by (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? the procedures as washing, cleaning, polishing, sorting, dehydration and others. Therefore, it may lead to a generation of wastewater, which will be discharged to the central sewage system, with the subsequent dumping into the region sewerage. Production operations can cause appearing generated solid and household wastes, which ought to be collected and disposed to the special landfill. Food waste is planned to be utilized for cattle feed.
Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard presented the clarification to the subproject requirements and their implementation? owner all the requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard in order to accomplish during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. ,Have there been any grievances or complaints No,by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: PE «Bunyod servТs lyuks» Subproject location: Region of Andijan,Asaka districtKujgan streetNavoiy Horticulture sector: Organization of drying of agricultural products with annual capacity of 1116 tonnes Value of exposure (US$ ): 650 000,0 Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried Was any environmental and social due diligence out a check-out at the site of the site and on the undertaken by your organization? basis of supporting documents on protective measures and an environmental management plan was developed. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the project through due diligence conducted by your was instructed to take the waste to specially organization, and how were the issues dealt with remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. It was discussed, explained and clarified to applicable environmental and social safeguard the subproject owner by the bank specialists requirements and their implementation? with all the requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes,according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No,there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No,by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC «Sabo Бamkor» Region of Andijan, city of Andijan, Babur street Subproject location: 73. Organization of a greenhouse farm for growing Horticulture sector: agricultural products such as vegetables and bananas with 3 hectares Value of exposure (US$ ): 1 314 390,0 Held. Particularly there were undertaken preliminary analyses of environmental impact Was any environmental and social due diligence (ecological screening), social safeguards undertaken by your organization? screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the project through due diligence conducted by your was instructed to take the waste to specially organization, and how were the issues dealt with remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: «AndТjon export and Тmport busТness solutТons» Subproject location: Region of Andijan, Paxtaobod district Nodirabegim Horticulture sector: Organization of drying agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 316 400,0 Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried Was any environmental and social due diligence out a check-out at the site of the site and on the undertaken by your organization? basis of supporting documents on protective measures and an environmental management plan was developed. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues Due to the screening the process, there are associated with this subproject that were identified occurred formation of construction, household, through due diligence conducted by your economic, and food waste. The initiator of the organization, and how were the issues dealt with project was instructed to take the waste to (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? specially remote places. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. It was discussed, explained and clarified to applicable environmental and social safeguard the subproject owner by the bank specialists requirements and their implementation? with all the requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No,there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No,by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC «Jondor QurТlТsС Invest» Subproject location: Buhara region, Jondor city, F.Hudjaev street. 20 Organization of a greenhouse farm for growing Horticulture sector: agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 1 998 756,0 Held. Particularly there were undertaken Was any environmental and social due diligence preliminary analyses of environmental impact undertaken by your organization? (ecological screening), social safeguards screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the project through due diligence conducted by your was instructed to take the waste to specially organization, and how were the issues dealt with remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. , Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC «Eltek Eksk lyuzТv» Subproject location: Buhara region, Buhara city, Namozgox street. 92/7 Horticulture sector: Organization of a greenhouse farm for growing agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 450 000,0 Yes, particularly there were undertaken preliminary analyses of environmental impact Was any environmental and social due diligence (ecological screening), social safeguards undertaken by your organization? screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues By the result of inspection of this project it is associated with this subproject that were identified revealed that there will be generated industrial through due diligence conducted by your and consumption waste, which are formed within organization, and how were the issues dealt with a year, such as waste of tops of vegetables, (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? waste of the used polyethylene film, waste of the rejected boxes, waste of worn-out bags, fluorescent lamps. As the technology of energy and resource effТcТent greenСouse doesn’t imply planting of seedlings into the ground and implies the use of hydroponics, there will be no pollution of soil and cultivation of land. The greenhouse will be operated with natural gas, which can help to avoid emission of air polluting substances in large volumes. As this environment-friendly technology is designated to save resources, chemical fertilizers will be used in limited volumes through a drip irrigation system, which also saves water resources provided from the planned artesian well. Also short-term influence in the atmosphere of inorganic dust when carrying out construction works of an object is expected, the project has provided dust suppression of the working platform. For each type of waste the place and conditions for temporary storage at the site territory as well as further movement of waste has been determined. In particular, consumption residual shall be submitted to specialized enterprises for utilization. Used mercury lamps shall be submitted to specialized companies for demercuration. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: PE «Uktam Buston SaxovatТ» Subproject location: Buhara region, Bukhara city, Otbozor Horticulture sector: Organization of a greenhouse farm for growing agricultural products for 1,13 years Value of exposure (US$ ): 450 000,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, particularly there were undertaken undertaken by your organization? preliminary analyses of environmental impact (ecological screening), social safeguards screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues By the result of inspection of this project it is associated with this subproject that were identified revealed that there will be generated industrial through due diligence conducted by your and consumption waste, which are formed within organization, and how were the issues dealt with a year, such as waste of a tops of vegetables, (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? waste of the used polyethylene film, waste of the rejected boxes, waste of worn-out bags, fluorescent lamps. As the technology of energy and resource effТcТent greenСouse doesn’t imply planting of seedlings into the ground and implies the use of hydroponics, there will be no pollution of soil and cultivation of land. The greenhouse will be operated with natural gas, which can help to avoid emission of air polluting substances in large volumes. As this environment-friendly technology is designated to save resources, chemical fertilizers will be used in limited volumes through a drip irrigation system, which also saves water resources provided from the planned artesian well. Also short-term influence in the atmosphere of inorganic dust when carrying out construction works of an object is expected, the project has provided dust suppression of the working platform. For each type of waste the place and conditions for temporary storage at the site territories as well as further movement of waste have been determined. In particular, consumption residual shall be submitted to specialized enterprises for utilization. Used mercury lamps shall be submitted to specialized companies for demercuration. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder? Name of Subproject Company: LLC «Gala RТver» Subproject location: Buhara region, Buhara city, Furkhat street, 5 Horticulture sector: On the organization of the enterprise for the production of wine and concentrated grape juice Value of exposure (US$ ): 1 082 800,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, particularly there were undertaken undertaken by your organization? preliminary analyses of environmental impact (ecological screening), social safeguards screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues In the technological process, waste will be associated with this subproject that were identified formed in the form of combat scraps, skin, grape through due diligence conducted by your seeds, used mineral materials (betonies, organization, and how were the issues dealt with diatomite, and perlite), waste paper, spent (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? fluorescent lamps, food residues and solid waste. The pressing, grape seeds and waste of the crests, along with the remainder of the food, are given to farmers for feeding cattle, waste paper - to recyclable materials. Spent fluorescent lamps will be surrendered for demercurization. The used mineral materials and solid waste are transported to the landfill for solid waste. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes,Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC «Grand BukСara argo» Subproject location: Buhara region, Kogon street Turkunda Horticulture sector: Organization of a greenhouse farm for growing agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 2 000 000,0 Yes, particularly there were undertaken Was any environmental and social due diligence preliminary analyses of environmental impact undertaken by your organization? (ecological screening), social safeguards screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the project through due diligence conducted by your was instructed to take the waste to specially organization, and how were the issues dealt with remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have therebeen any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC «Congress BukСara agro» Subproject location: Bukhara region, Kogon street Turkunda Horticulture sector: Organization of a greenhouse farm for growing agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 250 000,0 Yes, particularly there were undertaken Was any environmental and social due diligence preliminary analyses of environmental impact undertaken by your organization? (ecological screening), social safeguards screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the project through due diligence conducted by your was instructed to take the waste to specially organization, and how were the issues dealt with remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes,according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC «MojТza agro sanoat servТce» Subproject location: Namangan region Yankurgan district korapolvonstreet Horticulture sector: Organization of a greenhouse farm for growing agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 960 000,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, particularly there were undertaken undertaken by your organization? preliminary analyses of environmental impact (ecological screening), social safeguards screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the project through due diligence conducted by your was instructed to take the waste to specially organization, and how were the issues dealt with remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. , Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise, Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC «Kelajak tamТr savdo servТce» Subproject location: Namangan city, Sharshara street. House 60 Horticulture sector: Organization of a greenhouse farm for growing agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 180 000,0 Yes, particularly there were undertaken Was any environmental and social due diligence preliminary analyses of environmental impact undertaken by your organization? (ecological screening), social safeguards screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues By the result of inspection of this project it is associated with this subproject that were identified revealed that there will be generated industrial through due diligence conducted by your and consumption waste, which are formed within organization, and how were the issues dealt with a year, such as waste of a tops of vegetables, (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? waste of the used polyethylene film, waste of the rejected boxes, waste of worn-out bags, fluorescent lamps. As the technology of energy and resource effТcТent greenСouse doesn’t imply planting of seedlings into the ground and implies the use of hydroponics, there will be no pollution of soil and cultivation of land. The greenhouse will be operated with natural gas, which can help to avoid emission of air polluting substances in large volumes. As this environment-friendly technology is designated to save resources, chemical fertilizers will be used in limited volumes through a drip irrigation system, which also saves water resources provided from the planned artesian well. Also short-term influence in the atmosphere of inorganic dust when carrying out construction works of an object is expected, the project has provided dust suppression of the working platform. For each type of waste the place and conditions for temporary storage at the site territories as well as further movement of waste have been determined. In particular, consumption residual shall be submitted to specialized enterprises for utilization. Used mercury lamps shall be submitted to specialized companies for demercuration. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder? Name of Subproject Company: «BotТr Isayev» Subproject location: Namangan region, Namangan district. Irvodon Horticulture sector: Organization of drying agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 275 530,0 Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried Was any environmental and social due diligence out a check-out and on the basis of supporting undertaken by your organization? documents on protective measures and an environmental management plan was developed. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues While the conduction of screening and due to the associated with this subproject that were identified process, Formation of construction, household, through due diligence conducted by your economic, food waste are occured. The initiator organization, and how were the issues dealt with of the project was instructed to take the waste to (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? specially remote places. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes,Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes,it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes,according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No,there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No,by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC «Apple UnТversal ServТce» Subproject location: Samarkhand region, Pastirgan district, selo bolti ali Horticulture sector: Organization of a greenhouse farm for growing agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 700 000,0 Yes, particularly there were undertaken Was any environmental and social due diligence preliminary analyses of environmental impact undertaken by your organization? (ecological screening), social safeguards screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the project through due diligence conducted by your was instructed to take the waste to specially organization, and how were the issues dealt with remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: «OcСТlov JavoxТr Uzum Bog» Farm enterprТse Subproject location: Samarkhand region, Pastirgan district, selo Namuna Horticulture sector: Organization of a greenhouse farm for growing agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 386 000,0 Yes, particularly there were undertaken Was any environmental and social due diligence preliminary analyses of environmental impact undertaken by your organization? (ecological screening), social safeguards screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes, documents on this project, such as Project reports reviewed by your organization? of ZVOS (environmental assessment report) and Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise under the State Committee on Ecology and Environmental Protection, were inspected by credit expert and ESMS coordinator.. What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the project through due diligence conducted by your was instructed to take the waste to specially organization, and how were the issues dealt with remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC «Samarkand TemТr Beton KonstruktsТya» Subproject location: Samarkhand region, Okdarya district. Hamraev street Horticulture sector: Organization of a greenhouse farm for growing agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 546 400,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, particularly there were undertaken undertaken by your organization? preliminary analyses of environmental impact (ecological screening), social safeguards screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues By the result of inspection of this project it is associated with this subproject that were identified revealed that there will be generated industrial through due diligence conducted by your and consumption waste, which are formed within organization, and how were the issues dealt with a year, such as waste of tops of vegetables, (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? waste of the used polyethylene film, waste of the rejected boxes, waste of worn-out bags, fluorescent lamps. As the technology of energy and resource effТcТent greenСouse doesn’t imply planting of seedlings into the ground and implies the use of hydroponics, there will be no pollution of soil and cultivation of land. The greenhouse will be operated with natural gas, which can help to avoid emission of air polluting substances in large volumes. As this environment-friendly technology is designated to save resources, chemical fertilizers will be used in limited volumes through a drip irrigation system, which also saves water resources provided from the planned artesian well. Also short-term influence in the atmosphere of inorganic dust when carrying out construction works of an object is expected, the project has provided dust suppression of the working platform. For each type of waste the place and conditions for temporary storage at the site territories as well as further movement of waste have been determined. In particular, consumption residual shall be submitted to specialized enterprises for utilization. Used mercury lamps shall be submitted to specialized companies for demercuration. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: PE «Urgut electro servТce» Subproject location: Samarkhand region, Urgut district. Ilonli street Horticulture sector: Organization of drying agriculture products Value of exposure (US$ ): 225 606,0 Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried Was any environmental and social due diligence out a check-out at the site of the site and on the undertaken by your organization? basis of supporting documents on protective measures and an environmental management plan was developed. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes, documents on this project, such as Project reports reviewed by your organization? of ZVOS (environmental assessment report) and Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise under the State Committee on Ecology and Environmental Protection, were inspected by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the project through due diligence conducted by your was instructed to take the waste to specially organization, and how were the issues dealt with remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes,it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes,according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No,there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No,by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC «SСokСjakСon Bobur boglarТ» Subproject location: Samarkhand region, Samarkhand district Horticulture sector: Organization of a greenhouse farm for growing agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 580 000,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, particularly there were undertaken undertaken by your organization? preliminary analyses of environmental impact (ecological screening), social safeguards screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes, documents on this project, such as Project reports reviewed by your organization? of ZVOS (environmental assessment report) and Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise under the State Committee on Ecology and Environmental Protection, were inspected by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the project through due diligence conducted by your was instructed to take the waste to specially organization, and how were the issues dealt with remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: «IntensТv gold fruТt» Farm enterprТse Subproject location: Samarkhand region, Urgut district, Agro firm Dekhon obod Horticulture sector: Organization of drying agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 1 749 600,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Held. The coordinator of the sub-project undertaken by your organization? completed a check-out and on the basis of supporting documents on protective measures and an environmental management plan was developed. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the project through due diligence conducted by your was instructed to take the waste to specially organization, and how were the issues dealt with remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: PE LLC «SТrdarТnskТy Bereg» Subproject location: Sirdarya region, Saykhunobod district. Yoshlik Horticulture sector: Organization of a greenhouse farm for growing agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 4 900 000,0 Yes, particularly there were undertaken Was any environmental and social due diligence preliminary analyses of environmental impact undertaken by your organization? (ecological screening), social safeguards screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes, documents on this project, such as Project reports reviewed by your organization? of ZVOS (environmental assessment report) and Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise under the State Committee on Ecology and Environmental Protection, were inspected by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. What were the main environmental issues By the result of inspection of this project it is associated with this subproject that were identified revealed that there will be generated industrial through due diligence conducted by your and consumption waste, which are formed within organization, and how were the issues dealt with a year, such as waste of a tops of vegetables, (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? waste of the used polyethylene film, waste of the rejected boxes, waste of worn-out bags, fluorescent lamps. As the technology of energy and resource effТcТent greenСouse doesn’t imply planting of seedlings into the ground and implies the use of hydroponics, there will be no pollution of soil and cultivation of land. The greenhouse will be operated with natural gas, which can help to avoid emission of air polluting substances in large volumes. As this environment-friendly technology is designated to save resources, chemical fertilizers will be used in limited volumes through a drip irrigation system, which also saves water resources provided from the planned artesian well. Also short-term influence in the atmosphere of inorganic dust when carrying out construction works of an object is expected, the project has provided dust suppression of the working platform. For each type of waste the place and conditions for temporary storage at the site territories as well as further movement of waste have been determined. In particular, consumption residual shall be submitted to specialized enterprises for utilization. Used mercury lamps shall be submitted to specialized companies for demercuration. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC «Asl Meva Invest» Subproject location: Andijan region, Buzsom district. A.Ikramov street Horticulture sector: Organization of drying agricultural products with annual capacity of 400tonnes Value of exposure (US$ ): 100 000,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried undertaken by your organization? out a check-out and on the basis of supporting documents on protective measures and an environmental management plan was developed. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the project through due diligence conducted by your was instructed to take the waste to specially organization, and how were the issues dealt with remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes,Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes,according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC «MТrzaobod UnТversal Trade» Subproject location: Sirdarya region, Mirzaabad district Horticulture sector: Organization of a greenhouse farm for growing agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 4 900 000,0 Yes, particularly there were undertaken Was any environmental and social due diligence preliminary analyses of environmental impact undertaken by your organization? (ecological screening), social safeguards screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues associated with this subproject that were identified Formation of construction, household, through due diligence conducted by your economic, food waste. The initiator of the project organization, and how were the issues dealt with was instructed to take the waste to specially (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? remote places. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC «БojТ BakСodТrxon Ota» Subproject location: Sirdarya region, Xovos district Horticulture sector: Organization of a greenhouse farm for growing agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 1 000 000,0 Yes, particularly there were undertaken Was any environmental and social due diligence preliminary analyses of environmental impact undertaken by your organization? (ecological screening), social safeguards screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues By the result of inspection of this project it is associated with this subproject that were identified revealed that there will be generated industrial through due diligence conducted by your and consumption waste, which are formed within organization, and how were the issues dealt with a year, such as waste of tops of vegetables, (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? waste of the used polyethylene film, waste of the rejected boxes, waste of worn-out bags, fluorescent lamps. As the technology of energy and resource effТcТent greenСouse doesn’t imply planting of seedlings into the ground and implies the use of hydroponics, there will be no pollution of soil and cultivation of land. The greenhouse will be operated with natural gas, which can help to avoid emission of air polluting substances in large volumes. As this environment-friendly technology is designated to save resources, chemical fertilizers will be used in limited volumes through a drip irrigation system, which also saves water resources provided from the planned artesian well. Also short-term influence in the atmosphere of inorganic dust when carrying out construction works of an object is expected, the project has provided dust suppression of the working platform. For each type of waste the place and conditions for temporary storage at the site territories as well as further movement of waste have been determined. In particular, consumption residual shall be submitted to specialized enterprises for utilization. Used mercury lamps shall be submitted to specialized companies for demercuration. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC «Nulu Fayz Imkon» Subproject location: Surkhandarya region, Sariosiyo district, Uzbekistan street Horticulture sector: Organization of drying agricultural Value of exposure (US$ ): 325 000,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Held.Particularly there was undertaken undertaken by your organization? preliminary analysis of environmental impact (ecological screening), social safeguards screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the project through due diligence conducted by your was instructed to take the waste to specially organization, and how were the issues dealt with remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: «Surxan obТ Сayat» Subproject location: Surkhandarya region, Termez city, Yangiyer street Horticulture sector: Organization of drying agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 5 000 000,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried undertaken by your organization? out a check-out at the site of the site and on the basis of supporting documents on protective measures and an environmental management plan was developed. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the project through due diligence conducted by your was instructed to take the waste to specially organization, and how were the issues dealt with remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes,Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes,according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No,there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No,by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: «EzgulТk SarТ Agro» Subproject location: Tashkent region, Kibray district, Horticulture sector: Organization of a greenhouse farm for growing agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 1 970 000,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, particularly there were undertaken undertaken by your organization? preliminary analyses of environmental impact (ecological screening), social safeguards screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the project through due diligence conducted by your was instructed to take the waste to specially organization, and how were the issues dealt with remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints Noby this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC «Mux plast servТce» Subproject location: Fergana region, Toshlaq district, ogaxiy street, house 137 Horticulture sector: Organization of drying agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 493 000,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried undertaken by your organization? out a check-out at the site of the site and on the basis of supporting documents on protective measures and an environmental management plan was developed. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the project through due diligence conducted by your was instructed to take the waste to specially organization, and how were the issues dealt with remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints Noby this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: JoТnt Venture «NodТra DТyor MevalarТ» Subproject location: Fergana region, Oliariq district, Furkhat street house 19 Horticulture sector: Organization of drying agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 150 000,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried undertaken by your organization? out a check and on the basis of supporting documents on protective measures and an environmental management plan was developed. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the project through due diligence conducted by your was instructed to take the waste to specially organization, and how were the issues dealt with remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC «ГТmnТy sad» Subproject location: Fergana region, Dangar district, selo Chinaabad Horticulture sector: Organization of a greenhouse farm for growing agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 3 167 900,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried undertaken by your organization? out a check-out at the site of the site and on the basis of supporting documents on protective measures and an environmental management plan was developed. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the project through due diligence conducted by your was instructed to take the waste to specially organization, and how were the issues dealt with remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder? Name of Subproject Company: LLC «CСodak Sardor farm servТs» Subproject location: Fergana region, Tashlaq district, Navoiy street, house 16 Horticulture sector: Organization of drying agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 390 000,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried undertaken by your organization? out a check and on the basis of supporting documents on protective measures and an environmental management plan was developed. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the project through due diligence conducted by your was instructed to take the waste to specially organization, and how were the issues dealt with remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes. Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, bank specialists discussed, explained and government requirements? clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive safeguard requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, according to the results of preliminary compliance or requests for corrective actions? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, there were no incidents of non-compliance lodged on the subproject by any affected person or observed. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC «Вozavon MarvarТdТ» Subproject location: Fergana region, Yezvon district, Mustakillik street, house 5 Horticulture sector: Organization of drying agricultural products Value of exposure (US$ ): 118 000,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Held. The coordinator of the sub-project carried undertaken by your organization? out a check-out at the site of the site and on the basis of supporting documents on protective measures and an environmental management plan was developed. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the project through due diligence conducted by your was instructed to take the waste to specially organization, and how were the issues dealt with remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC«AlТ KusСcСТ agro export» Subproject location: Xorezm region, Xazarasp district, G.Gulam street 101 Horticulture sector: Organization of a greenhouse farm for growing agricultural products for 2,6 years Value of exposure (US$ ): 1 092 800,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, particularly there were undertaken undertaken by your organization? preliminary analyses of environmental impact (ecological screening), social safeguards screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues Formation of construction, household, associated with this subproject that were identified economic, food waste. The initiator of the project through due diligence conducted by your was instructed to take the waste to specially organization, and how were the issues dealt with remote places. (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder? Name of Subproject Company: LLC «RТv Makon» Subproject location: Samarkhand region, Samarkhand district, Ulugbekh Horticulture sector: Organization of gardening Value of exposure (US$ ): 449 480,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, particularly there were undertaken undertaken by your organization? preliminary analyses of environmental impact (ecological screening), social safeguards screening, and safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State Ecological associated with this subproject that were identified Expertise this project falls under the 4th category through due diligence conducted by your in compliance with Decree of Cabinet of organization, and how were the issues dealt with Ministers #491 dated 31/12/2001. However, (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? because of large scale of operation, namely intensive gardening in 93 hectares and by the results of conducted preliminary environmental and social impacts analyzes and safeguard due diligence report specialists of the bank assigned to the project category B on environmental impact and category C on involuntary resettlement impact. There were no serious issues observed within this project, as the technology of intensive gardening itself means the economy and saving of resources. However, other factors with less considerable impact and consequences, such as intensive cultivation of land, which may lead to the change in landscape, occurrence of household and construction waste in minor volumes, use of chemical fertilizers, which may cause soil pollution, possible stagnation of water and others were also studied. By the end of inspection, there were held explanatory talks with project initiators, during which it was clarified that minor household and construction wastes occurring within a project will be collected to a special metal container and utilized in specially designated places, only permitted types of chemical fertilizers will be used in an economical manner and limited amounts through a drip irrigation system, which also help to avoid water stagnation. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC «Sag Agro» Subproject location: Samarkhand region, Jomboy district, selo Navbahor Horticulture sector: Organization of gardening Value of exposure (US$ ): 4 750 000,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, particularly there were undertaken undertaken by your organization? preliminary analysis of environmental impact (ecological screening), social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State Ecological associated with this subproject that were identified Expertise this project falls under the 4th category through due diligence conducted by your in compliance with Decree of Cabinet of organization, and how were the issues dealt with Ministers #491 dated 31/12/2001. However, (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? because of large scale of operation, namely intensive gardening in 93 hectares, and by the results of conducted preliminary environmental and social impacts analyzes and safeguard due diligence report specialists of the bank assigned to the project category B on environmental impact and category C on involuntary resettlement impact. There were no serious issues observed within this project, as the technology of intensive gardening itself means the economy and saving of resources. However, other factors with less considerable impact and consequences, such as intensive cultivation of land, which may lead to the change in landscape, occurrence of household and construction waste in minor volumes, use of chemical fertilizers, which may cause soil pollution, possible stagnation of water and others were also studied. By the end of inspection, there were held explanatory talks with project initiators, during which it was clarified that minor household and construction wastes occurring within a project will be collected to a special metal container and utilized in specially designated places, only permitted types of chemical fertilizers will be used in an economical manner and limited amounts through a drip irrigation system, which also help to avoid water stagnation. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No,there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed. Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Name of Subproject Company: LLC «Sag Agro Bulung'ur» Subproject location: Samrkhand region, Bulungur district, Urta buloq street Horticulture sector: Organization of gardening Value of exposure (US$ ): 1 924 000,0 Was any environmental and social due diligence Yes, particularly there were undertaken undertaken by your organization? preliminary analysis of environmental impact (ecological screening), social safeguards screening, safeguard due diligence briefing note during review. Review of safeguard documents and field visits were conducted by credit expert and ESMS coordinator. Any environmental assessment report or audit Yes. The Bank examined the ZVOS and the reports reviewed by your organization? conclusions of the state environmental review. What were the main environmental issues According to the Conclusion of State Ecological associated with this subproject that were identified Expertise this project falls under the 4th category through due diligence conducted by your in compliance with Decree of Cabinet of organization, and how were the issues dealt with Ministers #491 dated 31/12/2001. However, (i.e., outcome of due diligence)? because of large scale of operation, namely intensive gardening in 93 hectares, and by the results of conducted preliminary environmental and social impacts analyzes and safeguard due diligence report specialists of the bank assigned to the project category B on environmental impact and category C on involuntary resettlement impact. There were no serious issues observed within this project, as the technology of intensive gardening itself means the economy and saving of resources. However, other factors with less considerable impact and consequences, such as intensive cultivation of land, which may lead to the change in landscape, occurrence of household and construction waste in minor volumes, use of chemical fertilizers, which may cause soil pollution, possible stagnation of water and others were also studied. By the end of inspection, there were held explanatory talks with project initiators, during which it was clarified that minor household and construction wastes occurring within a project will be collected to a special metal container and utilized in specially designated places, only permitted types of chemical fertilizers will be used in an economical manner and limited amounts through a drip irrigation system, which also help to avoid water stagnation. Did you discuss with the subproject owner the Yes, Bank specialists discussed, explained and applicable environmental and social safeguard clarified to the subproject owner all the requirements and their implementation? requirements regarding the environmental and social safeguard that him/she should comply with during the implementation of project. Does the subproject comply with applicable Yes, it complies, as evidenced by the positive government requirements? Conclusion of State Ecological Expertise. Does the subproject comply with applicable ADB Yes, according to the results of preliminary safeguard requirements? analyzes, screening and safeguard due diligence this project complies with ADB safeguard requirements. Have there been any recorded incidents of non- No, there were no incidents of non-compliance compliance or requests for corrective actions? observed Have there been any grievances or complaints No, by this time there were no complaints lodged on the subproject by any affected person or received. concerned stakeholder?
Sub-projects of tСe category “C”Тn wСТcС are usedfromADB funds. the amount The Initiator of Sub- The locationof The goal of The basis for classifying a sub- № of the sub- loan Sub-project sub-project project into category "C" project (thousa nd US $)