Electoral Revolutions : a Comparative Study of Rapid Changes in Voter Turnout
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ELECTORAL REVOLUTIONS : A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RAPID CHANGES IN VOTER TURNOUT by ALBERTO LIOY A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Political Science and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2020 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Alberto Lioy Title: Electoral Revolutions: A Comparative Study of Rapid Changes in Voter Turnout This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of Political Science by: Craig Kauffman Chairperson and Advisor Craig Parsons Core Member Erin Beck Core Member Aaron Gullickson Institutional Representative and Kate Mondloch Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School. Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded September 2020. ii © 2020 Alberto Lioy iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Alberto Lioy Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science September 2020 Title: Electoral Revolutions: A Comparative Study of Rapid Changes in Voter Turnout In the political science scholarship on democratic elections, aggregate voter turnout is assumed to be stable, and depends upon an acquired habit across the electorate. Large turnout variations in a short period of time are therefore usually attributed to negligible contextual factors. This work establishes that such variations are more frequent than commonly thought and creates a novel theoretical framework and methodological approach for systematically studying rapid changes in voter turnout across Western Europe and Latin America. I attribute dramatic changes in voters’ participation, labeled electoral revolutions, to transformations in the party system competition and institutional credibility happening inside the national political context. Methodologically, it applies a detailed qualitative codebook to large samples of broad diffusion newspapers to trace the evolution of politics before the watershed elections that took place in France (1967), Great Britain (2001), Costa Rica (1998) and Honduras (2013). It finds that voter turnout dramatically increases in the presence of strengthening opposition parties, more credible institutions and a more differentiated party systems. Conversely, electoral participation is gravely damaged when opposition formations become weaker and more divided, when the administration loses popular support and political parties become less ideologically diverse. Finally, it establishes electoral revolutions as substantially important political phenomena with deep political and societal consequences, which policymakers and scholars choose to neglect at their own risk. iv CURRICULUM VITAE NAME OF AUTHOR: Alberto Lioy GRADUATE AND UNDERGRADUATE SCHOOLS ATTENDED: University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy DEGREES AWARDED: Doctor of Philosophy, Political Science, 2020, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA Master of Science, Political Science, 2016, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA Master of Science, Politics, 2012, University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece Laurea Magistrale (B.S.), Economics, 2012, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy AREAS OF SPECIAL INTEREST: Electoral Politics Party Politics European Politics Latin American and Caribbean Politics Authoritarian Politics New Media Monetary Policy PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Graduate Employee, Department of Political Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA, 2014-2020 Treasurer, Graduate Teaching Fellows Federation, Eugene, Oregon, USA, 2019-2020 Junior HR Administration Specialist, HP Global Business Services, Wroclaw, Poland, 2013-2014 Assistant Policy Analyst, Transparency International, Kirovograd (now v Kropyvnytskyi), Ukraine, 2013 Administrative and Policy Assistant, Istituto Bruno Leoni, Milano, Italy, 2010 GRANTS, AWARDS, AND HONORS: Graduate Teaching Fellowship, Department of Political Science, University of Oregon, 2014-2020 CLLAS Research Grant (3,500 USD) for archival work in Costa Rica, Summer 2019 William C. Mitchell Award, Department of Political Science, University of Oregon, 2017 PUBLICATIONS: Lioy, Alberto, and Stephen Dawson. "Competition, Stakes, And Falling Electoral participation in Central Asia and the Caucasus: A Comparative Analysis." Journal of Eurasian Studies (2020):1879366520928359. Lioy, Alberto, Marc Esteve Del Valle, and Julian Gottlieb. "Platform Politics: Party Organisation In The Digital Age." Information Polity 24.1 (2019): 41-58. vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the members of my dissertation committee – Craig Kauffman, Craig Parsons and Erin Beck – for all their feedback and advice at every step of the project. I am especially grateful to Craig Kauffman for understanding the research question early on, and respecting my idea of an eventful theorization despite the challenges it posed at empirical level. I would also like to thank Aaron Gullickson, who accepted to be the institutional member and provided a stimulating counterpoint from another discipline, and Robert Adcock of American University, whose workshop on historical methods at SPSA 2020 helped me think about the broader nature of my project. Outside of the committee, the single most important influence on my human and professional development during this doctoral degree has been Gerry Berk, whose kindness and continuous push to treat the research material at face value has been invaluable. Looking back, I would have never arrived here without the mentoring and advice of the academics that believed in me along the way and treated me as a scholar in the making, Nikos Marantzidis, Fabio Bagliano, Julian Gottlieb, and, above all, my father Antonio Lioy. My years in Oregon would have not been the same without my compagne and compagni of the GTFF grad student union, with whom I shared two years of laughing, crying, long nights, contract negotiations, major, and minor, victories and defeats. Working for the union also kept me anchored to a reality where people don’t understand why they should participate in a democratic process they feel is stacked against them, which is a problem of lacking political credibility, just like the ones I discuss in this work. vii My appreciation also goes to Missy’s two kids. A final thanks to the people at the Center of Latino and Latin American Studies at the University of Oregon – which provided funding and support for my archival research in Costa Rica in the summer of 2019 – in particular to Feather Crawford and Eli Meyer. viii To my wife Kat, for always being on my side through all this madness. Ό,τι σκοτώνεις είναι δικό σου για πάντα. ix TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………….1 1.1 Defining Electoral Revolutions…………………………………….2 1.2 Existing Theories Of Voter Turnout………..……………………...4 1.3 Theorizing Electoral Revolution………..…………………………..7 1.4 Selecting Electoral Revolutions………….…………………….…..11 1.5 Plan Of The Book……….…………….……………….…………17 II. THEORY AND METHODOLOGY……………...……………….…19 2.1 Theoretical Framework……..……..……………………………….20 2.1.1 Roots Of Competition: The Party System………………..21 2.1.2 Roots Of Credibility: Political Institutions………………23 2.1.3 Economic Voting….………………………………….…24 2.1.4 Protests And Social Movements….……………………...25 2.1.5 Accounting For Overlap And The Individual Level……...25 2.2 Empirical Model Of Social Reality………………………………...27 2.3 Methodological Approach………………………………………....29 2.4 Empirical Analysis………………………………………………...37 2.5 Tracing An Eventful Reality……………………………………….41 2.6 Institutions And Party Systems………………………..…………..45 2.6.1 The French Electoral Institutions And The French Party System In The 1960s…………………………………………..46 2.6.2 The Honduran Electoral Institutions And The Honduran Party System In The 2000s…………………………………….48 2.6.3 The Costa Rican Electoral Institutions And The Costa Rican Party System In The 1990s………………………...…….50 x Chapter Page 2.6.4 The British Electoral Institutions And The British Party System In The 1990s…….………………………………….…52 III. COMPETITION: THE MAJORITY………………………………….55 3.1 Different Cases, Different Starting Points…………………………59 3.1.1 The Gaullist Majority In France Before November 1962...59 3.1.2 The Partido Nacional In Honduras Before December 2009…………………………………………………………....61 3.1.3 The PLN In Costa Rica Before March 1994……………..62 3.1.4 The Labour Party In The United Kingdom Before April 1997……………….…………………………………………...64 3.2 Tracing The Main Events Across The Cases……………………....66 3.2.1 The Gaullist Majority In France From 1962 To 1967: Growing Competition In An Expansive Electoral Revolution…66 3.2.2 The Partido Nacional Majority In Honduras From 2009 To 2013: Growing Competition In An Expansive Electoral Revolution…………….……………………….………………71 3.2.3 The PLN Majority In Costa Rica From 1994 To 1998: Falling Competition In A Restrictive Electoral Revolution…….81 3.2.4 The Labour Majority In Britain From 1997 To 2001: Falling Competition In A Restrictive Electoral Revolution….…88 3.3 Rethinking the Majority’s Role In Political Competition..….……95 IV. COMPETITION: THE OPPOSITION………………………………97 4.1 Different Cases, Different Starting Points………………………..101 4.1.1 The Anti-Gaullist Opposition In France Before November 1962………………………………………………………….101 4.1.2 The Partido Liberal And The Minor Parties In Honduras Before December 2009……………………………………….103 4.1.3 PUSC And The Third Parties In Costa Rica Until March 1994 …………………………………….……………105