Dnieper River Basin Management Plan in Belarus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dnieper River Basin Management Plan in Belarus European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+): Results 2 and 3 ENI/2016/372-403 DNIEPER RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN IN BELARUS Annex 1: Attached tables Minsk, October 2018 Responsible EU member state consortium project leader Ms Josiane Mongellaz, Office International de l’Eau/International Office for Water (FR) EUWI+ country representative in Belarus Mr Alexandr Stankevich Responsible international thematic lead expert Mr Philippe Seguin, Office International de l’Eau/International Office for Water (FR) Responsible Belarusian thematic lead expert Ms Tatiana Slizh (Ministry of Natural Resources and Environ-mental Protection) Authors Mr Ivan Bulak Mr Vladimir Korneev Mr Aliaksander Pakhomau Disclaimer: The EU-funded program European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+ 4 EaP) is implemented by the UNECE, OECD, responsible for the implementation of Result 1 and an EU member state consortium of Austria, managed by the lead coordinator Umweltbundesamt, and of France, managed by the International Office for Water, responsible for the implementation of Result 2 and 3. This document, the “Dnieper River Basin Management Plan in Belarus”, was produced by the EU member state consortium with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union or the Governments of the Eastern Partnership Countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of, or sovereignty over, any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries, and to the name of any territory, city or area. Imprint Owner and Editor: EU Member State Consortium Office International de l’Eau/International Office for Water 21/23 rue de Madrid 75008 Paris, FRANCE October 2018 LIST OF ATTACHED TABLES TO THE DRAFT RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN OF THE DNIEPER RIVER Table 1 – Characteristics of river flow within the river basin ......................................................... 3 Table 1.1 – Resources of river runoff on areas belonging geographically to the basin of the Dnieper* .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Table 1.2 – Irrevocable water consumption in river flow regulation .............................................. 3 Table 1.3 – Average long-term characteristics of annual runoff and water resources of the rivers of the Dnieper basin in the years of various provisions .................................................................. 4 Table 1.4 – River runoff for the long-term period and 2017 for the Dnieper basin ........................ 6 River basin ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Table 2 – Groundwater resources and reserves within the Dnieper basin*..................................... 7 Table 3 – Main characteristics of surface water bodies (reservoirs) within the Dnieper river basin ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Ochesa. .......................................................................................................................................... 12 Table 3.1 – Distribution of reservoirs in the Dnieper basin by volume ........................................ 20 Table 4 – Main characteristics of surface water bodies (watercourses) within the Dnieper basin 21 Table 4.1 – Typification of the Dnieper basin watercourses ......................................................... 45 Table 4.2 – Typification of the Dnieper basin water bodies (reservoirs) ...................................... 45 Table 4.3 – Results of identification of surface water bodies in the Dnieper river basin within Belarus ........................................................................................................................................... 46 Table 4.4 – Violation of continuity of the flow of rivers ............................................................. 49 Table 4.5 – Hydrological changes of sites watercourses due to the influence of reservoirs ........ 51 Table 4.6 – Parts of the rivers of the Dnieper basin, subjected to the straightening of the channel ....................................................................................................................................................... 51 Table 4.7 - Analysis of other possible loads and their impacts in the Dnieper basin in Belarus .. 53 Table 4.8 - Main characteristics of underground water bodies in the Dnieper basin on the territory of Belarus based on the results of their identification ..................................................... 55 Table 5 – Characteristics of water use by river basin .................................................................... 56 * - the extracted underground water is transferred to subjects of managing of Minsk ............. 59 ** - data are presented by administrative-territorial units, it is not possible to present these data in the context of surface water bodies (for technical reasons-the lack of reference of these data to surface water bodies in the forms of state statistical reporting 1-water (Ministry of natural resources)) ..................................................................................................................... 59 Table 5.1 - Specific water consumption by river basin, l / day / person* ..................................... 59 Table 6 – Information on water users with harmful effects on surface water bodies .................... 60 Table 6.1-Data of the state statistical reporting 1-water (Ministry of natural resources) "Report on the use of water" for 2016 on the disposal of wastewater into the environment using filtration fields in the Dnieper basin, updated according to field surveys .................................................... 74 Table 6.2-Information on water users dumping insufficiently treated wastewater into surface water bodies ................................................................................................................................... 92 Table 6.3 - information on municipal solid waste landfills (MSWL) ........................................... 93 Table 6.4 – Intensity of pesticide use, kg per 1 ha of agricultural land ..................................... 95 Table 7 – Surface water bodies experiencing the greatest anthropogenic load as a result of wastewater discharge ................................................................................................................. 97 Table 8 – List of hydrological posts on rivers and canals in the Dnieper river basin ............... 98 Table 9 – List of hydrological posts on reservoirs in the Dnieper river basin .......................... 99 Table 10 – List of observation points for the state of surface water bodies by hydrochemical parameters in the Dnieper basin ................................................................................................ 99 Table 11 - List of observation points for the state of surface water bodies by hydrobiological indicators in the Dnieper basin in 2017 ................................................................................... 102 1 Table 12 – List of observation points for the state of surface water bodies based on hydro- morphological indicators in the Dnieper basin * ..................................................................... 104 Table 13 – Ecological condition (status) of surface water bodies in the basin of the Dnieper river based................................................................................................................................ 104 on observations of the system in 2017 .................................................................................... 104 Table 13.1 – Dynamics ecological status of surface water bodies of the Dnieper basin is based on observations carried out ...................................................................................................... 105 in the framework of the NEMS in the years 2015-2017.......................................................... 105 Table 13.2 – Assessment of the ecological status of water bodies of the Dnieper river basin taking into account the class of chemical indicators (numerator), hydrobiological indicators (denominator) and the degree of hydromorphological changes .............................................. 107 Table 13.3 – Summary table of the results of the ecological status of the surface water bodies of the Dnieper basin and the expected ecological status of the water bodies after the implementation of the RBMP measures .................................................................................. 112 Table 14 - List of observation points of the state of groundwater on the territory of the Dnieper river basin (for 2017) and corresponding water bodies ........................................................... 121 Table 14.1 - List of hydrological stations water in the basin of the Dnieper .......................... 123 Table 14.2 - Basic information on the operation of groundwater in the group water intakes of the Dnieper basin ..................................................................................................................... 124 Table 15 - List of surface water bodies provided for separate
Recommended publications
  • Subbuteo.No.10.Pdf
    ПРАВИЛА ДЛЯ АВТОРОВ (Tomialojc 1990)», либо «по сообщению В.А.Лысенко (1988) и Л.Томялойца (Tomialojc, 1990), данный вид 1) В бюллетене «Subbuteo» публикуются статьи и встречает-ся на осеннем пролете в Украине и Поль- краткие сообщения по всем проблемам орнитологии, ше». материалы полевых исследований, а также обзорные работы. Принимаются рукописи объемом до 10 стра- в списке литературы: ниц машинописи. Работы более крупного объема мо- книги: Паевский В.А. Демография птиц. — Л., 1985. гут быть приняты к опубликованию при специальном- –285 с. согласовании с редакционной коллегией. статьи: Ивановский И.И. Прошлое, настоящее и бу- 2) Статьи объемом более 1 стр. машинописи при- дущее сапсана в Беларуси // Труды Зоол. музея БГУ, т. нимаются только в электронном варианте. 1,–Минск, 1995. –с. 295–301. 3) Статьи и заметки объемом до 1 стр. принимают- тезисы: Самусенко И.Э. Аистообразные — эталон- ся либо в электронном, либо в машинописном вари- но-индикационная группа птиц // Материалы 10-й антах. Текст должен быть напечатан на белой бумаге Всесоюзн. орнитол. конф., ч. 2, кн. 2. — Минск, 1991. стандартного формата А4 (21 х 30 см) через 2 интерва- –с. 197–198. ла, не более 60 знаков в строке и 30 строк на странице. Редакция оставляет за собой право редактирова- Статьи, сообщения и заметки в рукописном вари- ния рукописей. Корректура иногородним авторам не анте принимаются только в виде исключения от орни- высылается. Возможно возвращение рукописей на тологов-любителей, студентов и учащихся. доработку. 4) Текст работы должен быть оформлен в следую- В одном номере бюллетеня публикуется, как пра- щем порядке: вило, не более двух работ одного автора. Исключение заглавие (заглавными буквами того же шрифта, что может быть сделано для работ в соавторстве.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Development in Belarus the Republic of Belarus Consists of Six
    Regional development in Belarus The Republic of Belarus consists of six regions. The smallest in territory is the Grodno region (25 thousand sq. km) and the largest is the Gomel region (40.4 thousand sq. km). The difference in population is not very large. Gomel has 1,527,500 inhabitants, while the Mogilev region, the smallest in population, has 1,191,800 people. Figure 3. Administrative map of Belarus Table 4 . Employment by major sectors of economy in Belarusian regions in 2001, %1. Regions Brest Vitebsk Gomel Grodno Minsk Mogilev Sectors of economy Industry 24.2 26.5 28.8 25.3 27.4 29.5 Agriculture 18.8 14.4 13.1 19.9 19.3 13.9 Trade and public catering 10.5 10.0 10.7 10.0 9.7 9.7 Transport 7.3 6.2 6.1 4.5 3.7 5.6 Construction 6.3 7.0 7.1 6.4 7.1 6.0 Source: Modified from Statistical Yearbook (2) The Belarusian regions are very similar in economic structure (Table 4). As shown in the table, the biggest part of the labor force in all regions is employed in industrial production. Agriculture accounts for between 13 and 20 % of the employed. This more or less equal structure of the economy in all the regions appeared during the Soviet period when the industrial production was centrally planned. Factories were located in various regions according to strategic and geopolitical but not economic reasons. In the 1970s to ‘80s Belarus became the “assembly workshop” of the USSR.
    [Show full text]
  • The Upper Dnieper River Basin Management Plan (Draft)
    This project is funded Ministry of Natural Resources The project is implemented by the European Union and Environmental Protection by a Consortium of the Republic of Belarus led by Hulla & Co. Human Dynamics KG Environmental Protection of International River Basins THE UPPER DNIEPER RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN (DRAFT) Prepared by Central Research Institute for Complex Use of Water Resources, Belarus With assistance of Republican Center on Hydrometeorology, Control of Radioactive Pollution and Monitoring of Environment, Belarus And with Republican Center on Analytical Control in the field of Environmental Protection, Belarus February 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS.........................................................................................................................4 1.1 Outline of EU WFD aims and how this is addressed with the upper Dnieper RBMP ..........6 1.2 General description of the upper Dnieper RBMP..................................................................6 CHAPTER 2 CHARACTERISTIC OF DNIEPER RIVER BASIN ON THE BELARUS TERRITORY.................................................................................................................................10 2.1 Brief characteristics of the upper Dnieper river basin ecoregion (territory of Belarus) ......10 2.2 Surface waters......................................................................................................................10 2.2.1 General description .......................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • ZRBG – Ghetto-Liste (Stand: 01.08.2014) Sofern Eine Beschäftigung I
    ZRBG – Ghetto-Liste (Stand: 01.08.2014) Sofern eine Beschäftigung i. S. d. ZRBG schon vor dem angegebenen Eröffnungszeitpunkt glaubhaft gemacht ist, kann für die folgenden Gebiete auf den Beginn der Ghettoisierung nach Verordnungslage abgestellt werden: - Generalgouvernement (ohne Galizien): 01.01.1940 - Galizien: 06.09.1941 - Bialystok: 02.08.1941 - Reichskommissariat Ostland (Weißrussland/Weißruthenien): 02.08.1941 - Reichskommissariat Ukraine (Wolhynien/Shitomir): 05.09.1941 Eine Vorlage an die Untergruppe ZRBG ist in diesen Fällen nicht erforderlich. Datum der Nr. Ort: Gebiet: Eröffnung: Liquidierung: Deportationen: Bemerkungen: Quelle: Ergänzung Abaujszanto, 5613 Ungarn, Encyclopedia of Jewish Life, Braham: Abaújszántó [Hun] 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Kassa, Auschwitz 27.04.2010 (5010) Operationszone I Enciklopédiája (Szántó) Reichskommissariat Aboltsy [Bel] Ostland (1941-1944), (Oboltsy [Rus], 5614 Generalbezirk 14.08.1941 04.06.1942 Encyclopedia of Jewish Life, 2001 24.03.2009 Oboltzi [Yid], Weißruthenien, heute Obolce [Pol]) Gebiet Vitebsk Abony [Hun] (Abon, Ungarn, 5443 Nagyabony, 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Encyclopedia of Jewish Life 2001 11.11.2009 Operationszone IV Szolnokabony) Ungarn, Szeged, 3500 Ada 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Braham: Enciklopédiája 09.11.2009 Operationszone IV Auschwitz Generalgouvernement, 3501 Adamow Distrikt Lublin (1939- 01.01.1940 20.12.1942 Kossoy, Encyclopedia of Jewish Life 09.11.2009 1944) Reichskommissariat Aizpute 3502 Ostland (1941-1944), 02.08.1941 27.10.1941 USHMM 02.2008 09.11.2009 (Hosenpoth) Generalbezirk
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Potential of Mogilev Region
    Investment potential of Mogilev region The population of Mogilev Region is mostly active in the WORKFORCE QUALIFICATIONS, 2012 (thsd. persons) industry (29.6%), commerce (11.8%), agriculture (11.1%) and education (10.9%). Workforce, total 589 557 including those with educational level as follows: POPULATION ACTIVE IN SECTORS OF ECONOMY, 2012 higher (thsd. persons) 118 107 Total active 491.1 vocational 135 361 including: specialised secondary 127 804 Industry 145.2 general secondary 187 873 Source: National Statistics Committee Trade 57.9 of the Republic of Belarus, 2013 Education 54.3 Agriculture 53.3 2. Region’s economy Healthcare and social services 37.1 Mogilev Region is one of the principal industrial regions of Construction 33.1 Belarus; it specialises in manufacturing of lifts, pneumatic Transport and communications 30.9 rubber tyres, tractor trailers, tractor-mounted mowers, steel Real estate, renting and business services 22.8 pipes, cement, slate, chemical fibres and yarn. The region occupies the leading positions in manufacturing of motor 1. Labour resources Public, social and personal services 19.5 scrapers, and underground road trains, farming machinery, Energy production and distribution 17.8 Employment by sector of economy (%), 2012 passenger lifts in the CIS. Mogilev region Other 10.5 The largest industrial centres are Mogilev, Bobruisk, Krichev, Hotels and restaurants 8.7 Kostyukovichi, Osipovichi. industry Source: National Statistics Committee Crop production leads in the agricultural industry: over 50% of the Republic of Belarus, 2013 2.1 of the region's territory is occupied by cultivated land. Grain 1.8 trade 3.6 The official unemployment level in the region is 0.6% of the (barley, rye, wheat), potatoes, forage crops prevail, flax education economically active population, which exceeds the national production is well-developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Duleby Islands-Zaozerye Ramsar Information Sheet December 2012
    Ramsar Site: 2138 – Duleby Islands-Zaozerye Ramsar Information Sheet December 2012 Additional information Boundary description The boundaries coincide with those of Republican hydrological reserves "Duleby Islands" and "Zaozerie". The boundaries of the national hydrological reserve " Duleby Islands" are: In the North - from the northern corner of the quarter # 44 of the Kirov forest along the boundaries of quarters # 44, 45, 46, 47, 58, 71 of this forest, along the boundaries of quarters # 11, 1, 2, 3, 15, 16, 4, 5, 6 , 20, 21, 7, 8, 9, of the State Forestry Enterprise "Drut Military Forestry"; In the East and South - along the boundaries of quarters # 9, 24, 42, 60, 74, 87, 99, 98, 97, 111, 110, 109, 108, 120, 121, 133, 145, 157, 168, 177, 176 , 180, 179, 178, 172, 171, 170, 169 of the State Forestry Enterprise "Drut Military Forestry"; The West - on the borders of quarters # 169, 158, 146, 134, 122, 112 of the State Forestry Enterprise "Drut Military Forestry", quarters, # 37, 26, 18, 12 Kolbchany forest, quarters # 83, 79, 72, 73, 66, 54,44 of the Kirov forest to the northern corner quarter # 44 of this forestry. The boundaries of the national hydrological reserve "Zaozerye" are: In the North - from the intersection of the southern boundary of the M4 highway Minsk-Mogilev on the northern boundary of the quarter # 40 of Osovets forestry of the State Forestry Enterprise "Belynichi Forestry", then in an easterly direction along the northern boundary of quarters # 40, 41 along said road to the intersection of the north border of quarter
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Media in Belarus
    Belarusian Association of Journalists (BAJ) MASS MEDIA IN BELARUS 2016 ANNUAL REPORT Minsk 2017 CONTENTS SITUATION IN THE SPHERE OF MASS MEDIA IN 2016 (OVERVIEW) ……………….…………………………………………….....…. 3 CHANGES IN LEGISLATION …………………………………………… 5 VIOLATIONS OF RIGHTS OF MASS MEDIA AND JOURNALISTS, CONFLICTS IN THE SPHERE OF MASS MEDIA ……………………………….................……...……....………………….. 8 Criminal cases ………………..…………………………………………………... 8 Other court cases (except for administrative prosecution) …….. 9 Detention of journalists, judicial administrative prosecution ….. 11 Physical attacks against journalists ……………………........................ 17 Seizure of equipment, damages, confiscation ………….……………. 19 Warnings of the Ministry of Information ………..……………………… 19 Restrictions on the free use of the Web ……………………………….. 20 Violations related to access to information ………….………………. 21 Violations during the elections to the House of Representatives of the National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus …................... 24 Economic policy in mass media field ………….…………………………. 25 Other forms of pressure and violation of rights of journalists and mass media ……………………………………………… 27 Mass-media in Belarus: 2016 SITUATION IN THE SPHERE OF MASS MEDIA IN 2016 (OVERVIEW) The main factor that influenced the media situation in Belarus in 2016 was the elections to the House of Representatives of the National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus. They took place in September 2016 against the backdrop of a worsening economic situation and a complex foreign policy environment. The Belarusian authorities sought to receive a positive assessment of the elections by international bodies, and as the election campaign approached and during its course, direct repression of journalists decreased. However, at the system level, the situation has not changed for the better, and the legislation in the field of media regulation has only become tougher. This shows the situational nature and volatility of some positive changes in the media sector in 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Item Transcript
    DIGITAL COLLECTIONS ITEM TRANSCRIPT Gregory Fein. Full, unedited interview, 2009 ID LA008.interview PERMALINK http://n2t.net/ark:/86084/b41h6r ITEM TYPE VIDEO ORIGINAL LANGUAGE RUSSIAN TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM TRANSCRIPT ENGLISH TRANSLATION 2 CITATION & RIGHTS 13 2021 © BLAVATNIK ARCHIVE FOUNDATION PG 1/13 BLAVATNIKARCHIVE.ORG DIGITAL COLLECTIONS ITEM TRANSCRIPT Gregory Fein. Full, unedited interview, 2009 ID LA008.interview PERMALINK http://n2t.net/ark:/86084/b41h6r ITEM TYPE VIDEO ORIGINAL LANGUAGE RUSSIAN TRANSCRIPT ENGLISH TRANSLATION —Today is March 17, 2009. We are in Los Angeles, meeting a veteran of the Great Patriotic War. Please introduce yourself and tell us about your life before the war. What was your family like, what did your parents do, what sort of school did you attend? How did the war begin for you and what did you do during the war? My name is Gregory Fein and I was born on April 18, 1921, in Propolsk [Prapoisk], which was later renamed Slavgorod [Slawharad], Mahilyow Region, Belarus. My father was an artisan bootmaker. We lived Propolsk until 1929. That year my family moved to Krasnapolle, a nearby town in the same region. We moved because my father had to work in an artel. In order for his children to have an education, he had to join an artisan cooperative rather than work alone. His skills were in demand in Kransopole [Krasnapolle], so we moved there, because there was a cooperative there. There were five children in the family and I was the youngest. My eldest sister Raya worked as a labor and delivery nurse her entire life.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration and Forecast of the Radioactive Contamination of the Soil, Water and Air on the Territory of Belarus After the Accident at the Chernobyl Npp
    MIGRATION AND FORECAST OF THE RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION OF THE SOIL, WATER AND AIR ON THE TERRITORY OF BELARUS AFTER THE ACCIDENT AT THE CHERNOBYL NPP I.I. MATVEENKO, N.G. GERMENCHUK, E.D. SHAGALOVA XA9745811 Committee for Hydrometeorology, Minsk, Belarus O.M. ZHUKOVA Hydrometeorology Committee, Ministry for Emergencies and Protection of the Public from the Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident, Minsk, Belarus 1.INTRODUCTION The accident at the Chernobyl NPP is the largest technogenic accident of our epoch, the global consequences of which for whole manhind with the course of time will larger and larger significance. In spite of the fact, that the radioactive contamination owing to the Chernobyl accident affected the whole world, just Belarus was subjected to the most intensive radioactive contamination. In addition the radioactive contamination territory of Belarus more than 37 kBq/sq.m. by caesium-137 has made 23 % from the whole of the Republic. At the same time as a result of the Chernobyl accident, 5,0 % of a territory of the Ukraine and 0,6 % of Russia have been contaminated with radionuclides (fig.l). BELARUS UKRAINE RUSSIA Fig. 1 Areas in Belarus, the Ukraine and Russia with the density of caesium-137 pollution over 37 kBq/a^ (tile ratio to the total area of the countries territory). 64 By virtue of a primary direction of movement of air masses, contamination with radionuclides in the northern-western, northern and northern-eastern directions in the initial period after the accident, the significant increase of the exposition doze rate was registered practically on the whole territory of Belarus.
    [Show full text]
  • Review-Chronicle
    REVIEW-CHRONICLE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BELARUS IN 1999 2 REVIEW-CHRONICLE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BELARUS IN 1999 INTRODUCTION: GENERAL CONCLUSIONS The year of 1999 was the last year of Alexander Lukashenka’s original mandate. In 1994 having used the machinery of democratic procedure he was elected president of the Republic of Belarus for five years term. But in 1996 A.Lukashenka conducted illegal, non-free and unfair referendum and by it prolonged his mandate to seven years. Constitutional Court’s judges and deputies of the Supreme Soviet that resisted to A.Lukashenka’s dictatorial intentions were dismissed. Thus provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus were broken. Attempt to conduct presidential elections done by the legitimate Supreme Soviet of the 13th convocation was supported by the most influential opposition parties and movements. But Belarusan authorities did their best to prevent opposition from succeeding in presidential elections and subjected people involved in election campaign to different kinds of repressions. Regime didn’t balk at anything in the struggle with its opponents. Detentions and arrests, persecutions of its organisers and participants, warnings, penalties and imprisonment followed every opposition-organised action… Yet the year of 1999 became a year of mass actions of protest of Belarusan people against a union with Russia imposed by the authorities to the people. In 1999 the OSCE Advisory and Monitoring Group in Belarus made an attempt to arrange talks between Belarusan authorities and opposition. This year will go down to history as a year when some of prominent politicians and fighters against the regime disappeared, when unprecedented number of criminal proceedings against opposition leaders and participants of mass actions of protest was instituted..
    [Show full text]
  • FEEFHS Journal Volume II 1994
    FEEFHS Newsletter of the Federation of East European Family History Societies Val 2,No. 3 July 1994 ISSN 1077-1247, PERSI #EEFN A total of about 75 people registered for the convention, and many others assisted in various capacities. There were a few unexpected problems, of course, but altogether the meetings THE FIRST FEEFHS CONVENTION, provided a valuable service, enough so tbat at the end of MAYby John 14-16, C. Alleman 1994 convention it was tentatively decided that next year we will try to hold two conventions, in Calgary, Alberta, and Cleveland, Our first FEEFHS convention was successfully held as Ohio, in order to help serve the interests of people who have scheduled on May 14-16, 1994, at the Howard Johnson Hotel difficulty coming to Satt Lake City. in Saft Lake City. The program followed the plan published in our last issue of the Newsletter, for the most part, and we will not repeat it here in order to save space. Anyone who desires more information on the suhjects presented in the conference addresses is encouraged to write directly to the speakers at the addresses given there. THANK YOU, CONVENTION by Ed Brandt,SPEAKERS Program Chair The most importanl business of the convention was the installation of permanent officers. Charles M. Hall, Edward Many people attending the FEEFHS convention commented R. Brandt, and John D. Movius had been elected and were favorably on the quality of our convention speakers and their installed as president, Ist vice president, and 2nd vice presentations. I have heard from quite a few who could not president, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Battles and Campaigns in 13Th–19Th Centuries
    POLISH BATTLES AND CAMPAIGNS IN 13TH–19TH CENTURIES WOJSKOWE CENTRUM EDUKACJI OBYWATELSKIEJ IM. PŁK. DYPL. MARIANA PORWITA 2016 POLISH BATTLES AND CAMPAIGNS IN 13TH–19TH CENTURIES WOJSKOWE CENTRUM EDUKACJI OBYWATELSKIEJ IM. PŁK. DYPL. MARIANA PORWITA 2016 Scientific editors: Ph. D. Grzegorz Jasiński, Prof. Wojciech Włodarkiewicz Reviewers: Ph. D. hab. Marek Dutkiewicz, Ph. D. hab. Halina Łach Scientific Council: Prof. Piotr Matusak – chairman Prof. Tadeusz Panecki – vice-chairman Prof. Adam Dobroński Ph. D. Janusz Gmitruk Prof. Danuta Kisielewicz Prof. Antoni Komorowski Col. Prof. Dariusz S. Kozerawski Prof. Mirosław Nagielski Prof. Zbigniew Pilarczyk Ph. D. hab. Dariusz Radziwiłłowicz Prof. Waldemar Rezmer Ph. D. hab. Aleksandra Skrabacz Prof. Wojciech Włodarkiewicz Prof. Lech Wyszczelski Sketch maps: Jan Rutkowski Design and layout: Janusz Świnarski Front cover: Battle against Theutonic Knights, XVI century drawing from Marcin Bielski’s Kronika Polski Translation: Summalinguæ © Copyright by Wojskowe Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej im. płk. dypl. Mariana Porwita, 2016 © Copyright by Stowarzyszenie Historyków Wojskowości, 2016 ISBN 978-83-65409-12-6 Publisher: Wojskowe Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej im. płk. dypl. Mariana Porwita Stowarzyszenie Historyków Wojskowości Contents 7 Introduction Karol Olejnik 9 The Mongol Invasion of Poland in 1241 and the battle of Legnica Karol Olejnik 17 ‘The Great War’ of 1409–1410 and the Battle of Grunwald Zbigniew Grabowski 29 The Battle of Ukmergė, the 1st of September 1435 Marek Plewczyński 41 The
    [Show full text]