DOCSLIB.ORG

The Upper Dnieper River Basin Management Plan (Draft)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Upper Dnieper River Basin Management Plan (Draft) This project is funded Ministry of Natural Resources The project is implemented by the European Union and Environmental Protection by a Consortium of the Republic of Belarus led by Hulla & Co. Human Dynamics KG Environmental Protection of International River Basins THE UPPER DNIEPER RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN (DRAFT) Prepared by Central Research Institute for Complex Use of Water Resources, Belarus With assistance of Republican Center on Hydrometeorology, Control of Radioactive Pollution and Monitoring of Environment, Belarus And with Republican Center on Analytical Control in the field of Environmental Protection, Belarus February 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS.........................................................................................................................4 1.1 Outline of EU WFD aims and how this is addressed with the upper Dnieper RBMP ..........6 1.2 General description of the upper Dnieper RBMP..................................................................6 CHAPTER 2 CHARACTERISTIC OF DNIEPER RIVER BASIN ON THE BELARUS TERRITORY.................................................................................................................................10 2.1 Brief characteristics of the upper Dnieper river basin ecoregion (territory of Belarus) ......10 2.2 Surface waters......................................................................................................................10 2.2.1 General description .......................................................................................................10 2.2.2 Identification of surface water bodies and their typology.............................................12 2.3 Ground waters......................................................................................................................14 2.2.1 General description .......................................................................................................14 2.2.2 Identification and typology of ground water bodies .....................................................15 2.3 Protected areas .....................................................................................................................17 CHAPTER 3 SIGNIFICANT PRESSURES AND POSSIBLE IMPACTS ON WATER STATUS .......................................................................................................................................................18 3.1 Surface waters......................................................................................................................19 3.1.1 Point sources of pollution..............................................................................................19 3.1.2 Diffuse (dispersed) sources of pollution .......................................................................21 3.1.3 Hydromorphological changes of water bodies..............................................................27 3.1.4 Other possible pressures and impacts ob surface water bodies.....................................30 3.2 Ground waters......................................................................................................................31 3.2.1 Pont sources of pollution...............................................................................................31 3.2.2 Diffuse (dispersed) sources of pollution .......................................................................31 CHAPTER 4 PROTECTED AREAS............................................................................................33 4.1 Inventory of protected areas related to various Directives and PA categories ....................33 4.2 Outline of planned monitoring for protected areas..............................................................33 4.3 Environmental objectives for protected areas......................................................................33 4.4 Program of measures for protected areas.............................................................................33 4.5 Water protection zones and riversides .................................................................................34 4.5.1 Basic regulations ...........................................................................................................34 4.5.2 General characteristics of water protection zones and riversides .................................35 CHAPTER 5 MONITORING PROGRAMMES AND NETWORKS .........................................39 5.1 Introduction and requirements .............................................................................................39 5.2 Surface waters (rivers and lakes) .........................................................................................40 5.2.1. Description of existing surface water monitoring system............................................40 5.2.2 Perspective surface waters monitoring system .............................................................44 5.2.3 Assessment of surface water bodies status....................................................................52 5.2.4 Surface water bodies at risk assessment........................................................................60 5.3 Ground water .......................................................................................................................72 5.3.1 Assessment of ground water body status .....................................................................72 2 5.3.2 Ground water bodies at risk assessment........................................................................74 5.3.3 Existing ground water monitoring network ..................................................................77 5.3.4 Perspective ground water monitoring network .............................................................77 CHAPTER 6 ENVIRONMENT OBJECTIVES AND EXEMPTIONS .....................................83 6.1 Environmental objectives.....................................................................................................83 6.2 Exemption according to WFD .............................................................................................83 CHAPTER 7 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS.......................................................................................86 7.1 Features of the economic (business) activity in the basin....................................................86 7.1.1 Population .....................................................................................................................86 7.1.2 Industry .........................................................................................................................88 7.1.3 Agriculture ....................................................................................................................89 7.1.4 Navigation, transport and transport infrastructure ........................................................90 7.1.5 Energetic .......................................................................................................................91 7.2 General characteristics of the water use...............................................................................92 7.3. Water balances....................................................................................................................96 CHAPTER 8 PROGRAM OF MEASURES.................................................................................99 CHAPTER 9 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND CONSULTATION........................................104 CHAPTER 10 COMPETENT AUTHORITIES .........................................................................105 CHAPTER 11 CONTACT POINTS ...........................................................................................105 ANNEXES ..................................................................................................................................106 ANNEX А CHARACTERISTICS OF WATER BODIES OF THE UPPER DNIEPER RIVER BASIN WITHIN BELARUS ......................................................................................................106 ANNEX B EXISTING PRESSURES AND IMPACTS ON THE WATER BODIES...............111 ANNEX C. LIST OF PROTECTED AREAS.............................................................................127 ANNEX D LIST OF MONITORING STATION.....................................................................129 ANNEX E RANGES OF CHEMICAL AND HYDROBIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS FOR THE GOOD WATER BODIES STATUS IN THE UPPER DNIEPER BASIN........................132 ANNEX F THE MOST SIGNIFICANT FACTORS OF SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER INFLUENCE ON THE SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND THE MAIN SECTORS OF THE ECONOMY ...............................................................................................135 ANNEX G GOVERNMENTAL AND SECTORAL PROGRAMS IN THE FIELD OF USE AND PROTECTION OF WATER RESOURCES .....................................................................137 ANNEX H WATER BALANCES CALCULATIONS RESULTS..........................................139 ANNEX I PROGRAM OF MEASURES TO ACHIVE GOOD ECOLOGICAL STATUS OF WATER BODIES IN THE UPPER DNIEPER BASIN .............................................................141 Annex I.1 – Basic measures to achive good ecological status of water bodies.......................141 Annex I.2 – Additional measures to achive good ecological status of water bodies...............145 Annex I.3 – Additional measures to support good ecological status of water bodies .............157 3 ABBREVIATIONS AWB artificial water bodies Belarus Republic of Belarus BNTU Belarusian National
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Individual V. State: Practice on Complaints with the United Nations Treaty Bodies with Regards to the Republic of Belarus
    Individual v. State: Practice on complaints with the United Nations treaty bodies with regards to the Republic of Belarus Volume I Collection of articles and documents The present collection of articles and documents is published within the framework of “International Law in Advocacy” program by Human Rights House Network with support from the Human Rights House in Vilnius and Civil Rights Defenders (Sweden) 2012 UDC 341.231.14 +342.7 (476) BBK 67.412.1 +67.400.7 (4Bel) I60 Edited by Sergei Golubok Candidate of Law, Attorney of the St. Petersburg Bar Association, member of the editorial board of the scientific journal “International justice” I60 “Individual v. State: Practice on complaints with the United Nations treaty bodies with regards to the Republic of Belarus”. – Vilnius, 2012. – 206 pages. ISBN 978-609-95300-1-7. The present collection of articles “Individual v. State: Practice on complaints with the United Nations treaty bodies with regards to the Republic of Belarus” is the first part of the two-volume book, that is the fourth publication in the series about international law and national legal system of the republic of Belarus, implemented by experts and alumni of the Human Rights Houses Network‘s program “International Law in Advocacy” since 2007. The first volume of this publication contains original writings about the contents and practical aspects of international human rights law concepts directly related to the Institute of individual communications, and about the role of an individual in the imple- mentation of international legal obligations of the state. The second volume, expected to be published in 2013, will include original analyti- cal works on the admissibility of individual considerations and the Republic of Belarus’ compliance with the decisions (views) by treaty bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Subbuteo.No.10.Pdf
    ПРАВИЛА ДЛЯ АВТОРОВ (Tomialojc 1990)», либо «по сообщению В.А.Лысенко (1988) и Л.Томялойца (Tomialojc, 1990), данный вид 1) В бюллетене «Subbuteo» публикуются статьи и встречает-ся на осеннем пролете в Украине и Поль- краткие сообщения по всем проблемам орнитологии, ше». материалы полевых исследований, а также обзорные работы. Принимаются рукописи объемом до 10 стра- в списке литературы: ниц машинописи. Работы более крупного объема мо- книги: Паевский В.А. Демография птиц. — Л., 1985. гут быть приняты к опубликованию при специальном- –285 с. согласовании с редакционной коллегией. статьи: Ивановский И.И. Прошлое, настоящее и бу- 2) Статьи объемом более 1 стр. машинописи при- дущее сапсана в Беларуси // Труды Зоол. музея БГУ, т. нимаются только в электронном варианте. 1,–Минск, 1995. –с. 295–301. 3) Статьи и заметки объемом до 1 стр. принимают- тезисы: Самусенко И.Э. Аистообразные — эталон- ся либо в электронном, либо в машинописном вари- но-индикационная группа птиц // Материалы 10-й антах. Текст должен быть напечатан на белой бумаге Всесоюзн. орнитол. конф., ч. 2, кн. 2. — Минск, 1991. стандартного формата А4 (21 х 30 см) через 2 интерва- –с. 197–198. ла, не более 60 знаков в строке и 30 строк на странице. Редакция оставляет за собой право редактирова- Статьи, сообщения и заметки в рукописном вари- ния рукописей. Корректура иногородним авторам не анте принимаются только в виде исключения от орни- высылается. Возможно возвращение рукописей на тологов-любителей, студентов и учащихся. доработку. 4) Текст работы должен быть оформлен в следую- В одном номере бюллетеня публикуется, как пра- щем порядке: вило, не более двух работ одного автора. Исключение заглавие (заглавными буквами того же шрифта, что может быть сделано для работ в соавторстве.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 3 February 2021 English
    United Nations ECE/TRANS/SC.3/WP.3/2021/11 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 3 February 2021 English Original: English, French and Russian Economic Commission for Europe Inland Transport Committee Working Party on Inland Water Transport Working Party on the Standardization of Technical and Safety Requirements in Inland Navigation Fifty-eighth session Geneva, 17–19 February 2021 Item 5 (b) of the provisional agenda Standardization of technical and safety requirements in inland navigation: Recommendations on Harmonized Europe-Wide Technical Requirements for Inland Navigation Vessels (resolution No. 61, revision 2) Proposals for amendments to appendix 1 of the annex to resolution No. 61, revision 2, “List of European inland waterways divided geographically into zones 1, 2 and 3” Transmitted by the Republic of Belarus*, ** Mandate 1. This document is submitted in line with the Proposed Programme Budget for 2021, part V, Regional cooperation for development, section 20, Economic Development in Europe. Programme 17, Economic Development in Europe (A/75/6 (Sect.20), para. 20.51). 2. The annex to the present document contains a proposal to revise the list of inland waterways of Belarus contained in appendix 1 of the annex to resolution No. 61, revision 2. The Working Party on the Standardization of Technical and Safety Requirements in Inland Navigation may wish to preliminarily approve this proposal and transmit it to the Working Party on Inland Water Transport for final adoption. * The present document was submitted after the deadline in order to reflect the most recent developments. ** The present document is being issued without formal editing. GE.21-01380(E) ECE/TRANS/SC.3/WP.3/2021/11 Annex Appendix 1, “List of European inland waterways divided geographically into zones 1, 2 and 3” (para.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing of Environmental Transfer Models Using Chernobyl Fallout Data from the Iput River Catchment Area, Bryansk Region, Russian Federation
    IAEA-BIOMASS-4 Testing of environmental transfer models using Chernobyl fallout data from the Iput River catchment area, Bryansk Region, Russian Federation Report of the Dose Reconstruction Working Group of BIOMASS Theme 2 Part of the IAEA Co-ordinated Research Project on Biosphere Modelling and Assessment (BIOMASS) April 2003 INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Waste Safety Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria TESTING OF ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSFER MODELS USING CHERNOBYL FALLOUT DATA FROM THE IPUT RIVER CATCHMENT AREA, BRYANSK REGION, RUSSIAN FEDERATION IAEA, VIENNA, 2003 IAEA-BIOMASS-4 ISBN 92–0–104003–2 © IAEA, 2003 Printed by the IAEA in Austria April 2003 FOREWORD The IAEA Programme on BIOsphere Modelling and ASSessment (BIOMASS) was launched in Vienna in October 1996. The programme was concerned with developing and improving capabilities to predict the transfer of radionuclides in the environment. The programme had three themes: Theme 1: Radioactive Waste Disposal. The objective was to develop the concept of a standard or reference biosphere for application to the assessment of the long term safety of repositories for radioactive waste. Under the general heading of “Reference Biospheres”, six Task Groups were established: Task Group 1: Principles for the Definition of Critical and Other Exposure Groups. Task Group 2: Principles for the Application of Data to Assessment Models. Task Group 3: Consideration of Alternative Assessment Contexts. Task Group 4: Biosphere System Identification and Justification. Task Group 5: Biosphere System Descriptions. Task Group 6: Model Development. Theme 2: Environmental Releases.
    [Show full text]
  • Duleby Islands-Zaozerye Ramsar Information Sheet December 2012
    Ramsar Site: 2138 – Duleby Islands-Zaozerye Ramsar Information Sheet December 2012 Additional information Boundary description The boundaries coincide with those of Republican hydrological reserves "Duleby Islands" and "Zaozerie". The boundaries of the national hydrological reserve " Duleby Islands" are: In the North - from the northern corner of the quarter # 44 of the Kirov forest along the boundaries of quarters # 44, 45, 46, 47, 58, 71 of this forest, along the boundaries of quarters # 11, 1, 2, 3, 15, 16, 4, 5, 6 , 20, 21, 7, 8, 9, of the State Forestry Enterprise "Drut Military Forestry"; In the East and South - along the boundaries of quarters # 9, 24, 42, 60, 74, 87, 99, 98, 97, 111, 110, 109, 108, 120, 121, 133, 145, 157, 168, 177, 176 , 180, 179, 178, 172, 171, 170, 169 of the State Forestry Enterprise "Drut Military Forestry"; The West - on the borders of quarters # 169, 158, 146, 134, 122, 112 of the State Forestry Enterprise "Drut Military Forestry", quarters, # 37, 26, 18, 12 Kolbchany forest, quarters # 83, 79, 72, 73, 66, 54,44 of the Kirov forest to the northern corner quarter # 44 of this forestry. The boundaries of the national hydrological reserve "Zaozerye" are: In the North - from the intersection of the southern boundary of the M4 highway Minsk-Mogilev on the northern boundary of the quarter # 40 of Osovets forestry of the State Forestry Enterprise "Belynichi Forestry", then in an easterly direction along the northern boundary of quarters # 40, 41 along said road to the intersection of the north border of quarter
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Media in Belarus
    Belarusian Association of Journalists (BAJ) MASS MEDIA IN BELARUS 2016 ANNUAL REPORT Minsk 2017 CONTENTS SITUATION IN THE SPHERE OF MASS MEDIA IN 2016 (OVERVIEW) ……………….…………………………………………….....…. 3 CHANGES IN LEGISLATION …………………………………………… 5 VIOLATIONS OF RIGHTS OF MASS MEDIA AND JOURNALISTS, CONFLICTS IN THE SPHERE OF MASS MEDIA ……………………………….................……...……....………………….. 8 Criminal cases ………………..…………………………………………………... 8 Other court cases (except for administrative prosecution) …….. 9 Detention of journalists, judicial administrative prosecution ….. 11 Physical attacks against journalists ……………………........................ 17 Seizure of equipment, damages, confiscation ………….……………. 19 Warnings of the Ministry of Information ………..……………………… 19 Restrictions on the free use of the Web ……………………………….. 20 Violations related to access to information ………….………………. 21 Violations during the elections to the House of Representatives of the National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus …................... 24 Economic policy in mass media field ………….…………………………. 25 Other forms of pressure and violation of rights of journalists and mass media ……………………………………………… 27 Mass-media in Belarus: 2016 SITUATION IN THE SPHERE OF MASS MEDIA IN 2016 (OVERVIEW) The main factor that influenced the media situation in Belarus in 2016 was the elections to the House of Representatives of the National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus. They took place in September 2016 against the backdrop of a worsening economic situation and a complex foreign policy environment. The Belarusian authorities sought to receive a positive assessment of the elections by international bodies, and as the election campaign approached and during its course, direct repression of journalists decreased. However, at the system level, the situation has not changed for the better, and the legislation in the field of media regulation has only become tougher. This shows the situational nature and volatility of some positive changes in the media sector in 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Review–Chronicle
    REVIEWCHRONICLE of the human rights violations in Belarus in 2005 Human Rights Center Viasna ReviewChronicle » of the Human Rights Violations in Belarus in 2005 VIASNA « Human Rights Center Minsk 2006 1 REVIEWCHRONICLE of the human rights violations in Belarus in 2005 » VIASNA « Human Rights Center 2 Human Rights Center Viasna, 2006 REVIEWCHRONICLE of the human rights violations in Belarus in 2005 INTRODUCTION: main trends and generalizations The year of 2005 was marked by a considerable aggravation of the general situation in the field of human rights in Belarus. It was not only political rights » that were violated but social, economic and cultural rights as well. These viola- tions are constant and conditioned by the authoritys voluntary policy, with Lu- kashenka at its head. At the same time, human rights violations are not merely VIASNA a side-effect of the authoritarian state control; they are deliberately used as a « means of eradicating political opponents and creating an atmosphere of intimi- dation in the society. The negative dynamics is characterized by the growth of the number of victims of human rights violations and discrimination. Under these circums- tances, with a high level of latent violations and concealed facts, with great obstacles to human rights activity and overall fear in the society, the growth points to drastic stiffening of the regimes methods. Apart from the growing number of registered violations, one should men- Human Rights Center tion the increase of their new forms, caused in most cases by the development of the state oppressive machine, the expansion of legal restrictions and ad- ministrative control over social life and individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Battles and Campaigns in 13Th–19Th Centuries
    POLISH BATTLES AND CAMPAIGNS IN 13TH–19TH CENTURIES WOJSKOWE CENTRUM EDUKACJI OBYWATELSKIEJ IM. PŁK. DYPL. MARIANA PORWITA 2016 POLISH BATTLES AND CAMPAIGNS IN 13TH–19TH CENTURIES WOJSKOWE CENTRUM EDUKACJI OBYWATELSKIEJ IM. PŁK. DYPL. MARIANA PORWITA 2016 Scientific editors: Ph. D. Grzegorz Jasiński, Prof. Wojciech Włodarkiewicz Reviewers: Ph. D. hab. Marek Dutkiewicz, Ph. D. hab. Halina Łach Scientific Council: Prof. Piotr Matusak – chairman Prof. Tadeusz Panecki – vice-chairman Prof. Adam Dobroński Ph. D. Janusz Gmitruk Prof. Danuta Kisielewicz Prof. Antoni Komorowski Col. Prof. Dariusz S. Kozerawski Prof. Mirosław Nagielski Prof. Zbigniew Pilarczyk Ph. D. hab. Dariusz Radziwiłłowicz Prof. Waldemar Rezmer Ph. D. hab. Aleksandra Skrabacz Prof. Wojciech Włodarkiewicz Prof. Lech Wyszczelski Sketch maps: Jan Rutkowski Design and layout: Janusz Świnarski Front cover: Battle against Theutonic Knights, XVI century drawing from Marcin Bielski’s Kronika Polski Translation: Summalinguæ © Copyright by Wojskowe Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej im. płk. dypl. Mariana Porwita, 2016 © Copyright by Stowarzyszenie Historyków Wojskowości, 2016 ISBN 978-83-65409-12-6 Publisher: Wojskowe Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej im. płk. dypl. Mariana Porwita Stowarzyszenie Historyków Wojskowości Contents 7 Introduction Karol Olejnik 9 The Mongol Invasion of Poland in 1241 and the battle of Legnica Karol Olejnik 17 ‘The Great War’ of 1409–1410 and the Battle of Grunwald Zbigniew Grabowski 29 The Battle of Ukmergė, the 1st of September 1435 Marek Plewczyński 41 The
    [Show full text]
  • Belarus OP7 CPS Approved
    SGP COUNTRY PROGRAMME STRATEGY FOR OP7 REPUBLIC OF BELARUS 1 Table of Content 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 3 2. BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 SUMMARY: Key Results/Accomplishments ............................................................................................ 3 3. COUNTRY PRIORITIES AND STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT ................................................................................... 5 3.1 Alignment with National Priorities ......................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Gaps and Opportunities ......................................................................................................................... 6 3.3 OP7 Strategic Priorities of the SGP Country Programme ....................................................................... 8 4. OP7 PRIORITY LANDSCAPES/SEASCAPES & STRATEGIC INITIATIVES ......................................................... 15 4.1 Grantmaking Within the Priority Landscape/Seascapes ...................................................................... 15 a) Process for selecting priority landscapes and seascapes. Selected Landscapes/Seascapes for OP7 15 b) OP7 Strategic Initiatives in the landscapes/seascapes .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Monitoring of Human Rights Center “Viasna” Concerning Tortures and Facts of Other Kinds of Inhumane Treatment Towards Citizens of Belarus
    REVIEW-CHRONICLE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BELARUS IN 2004 2 REVIEW-CHRONICLE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BELARUS IN 2004 PREAMBLE: CONCLUSIONS AND GENERALIZATIONS In 2004 the political situation in Belarus was distinguished by further worsening of the situation of human rights and the relations between the state and individuals. Regular and deliberate human rights violations became a necessary condition for the strengthening of the unlimited dictatorial power – infringements of human rights served as the funda¬ment for authoritarianism and were a favorable environment for the development of totalitarianism. One of the main factors that influenced the public and political situation in Belarus in 2004 was the Parliamentary election and the nationwide referendum concerning the possibility to prolong Aliaksandr Luka¬shenka’s presidential powers. The need for the liquidation of the cons¬ti¬tutional restriction of the number of possible presidential terms defined the state policy and influenced it in all circles of public life. This factor ma¬nifested in the sphere of human rights with the aggravation of the rep¬ressions against political opponents and prosecution of opposition-mindedness, enforcement of new discriminative legal acts, further limitation of the freedom of the press, violation of the liberty of peaceful assemblies and associations and other obstacles for the enjoyment of personal liberties by citizens of Belarus. Citizens of Belarus were deprived of the right to take part in the state government with the assistance of elected representatives. The election to the Chamber of Representatives wasn’t free and democratic. It was conducted according to the scenario that was prepared by the authorities in complete conformity with the “wishes” A.
    [Show full text]
  • SITUATION of HUMAN RIGHTS in BELARUS in 2014
    Human Rights Centre “Viasna” SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS in BELARUS in 2014 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Minsk, 2015 SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN BELARUS in 2014 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Author and compiler: Tatsiana Reviaka Editor and author of the foreword: Valiantsin Stefanovich The edition was prepared on the basis of reviews of human rights violations in Belarus published every month in 2014. Each of the monthly reviews includes an analysis of the most important events infl uencing the observance of human rights and outlines the most eloquent and characteristic facts of human rights abuses registered over the described period. The review was prepared on the basis of personal appeals of victims of human rights abuses and the facts which were either registered by human rights activists or reported by open informational sources. The book features photos from the archive of the Human Rights Center “Viasna”, as well as from publications on the websites of Radio Free Europe/ Radio Liberty Belarus service, the Nasha Niva newspaper, tv.lrytas.lt, baj.by, gazetaby.com, and taken by Franak Viachorka and Siarhei Hudzilin. Human Rights Situation in 2014: Trends and Evaluation The situation of human rights during 2014 remained consistently poor with a tendency to deterioration at the end of the year. Human rights violations were of both systemic and systematic nature: basic civil and political rights were extremely restricted, there were no systemic changes in the fi eld of human rights (at the legislative level and (or) at the level of practices). The only positive development during the year was the early release of Ales Bialiatski, Chairman of the Human Rights Centre “Viasna” and Vice-President of the International Federation for Human Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • OSCAAR Calculations for the Iput Dose Reconstruction Scenario Ofbiomasstheme2
    JAERI-Research JP0150244 2000-059 OSCAAR CALCULATIONS FOR THE IPUT DOSE RECONSTRUCTION SCENARIO 0FBI0MASSTHEME2 January 2001 Toshimitsu HOMMA and I akeshi MATSUNAGA a * i^ ? t> m ft p/f Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (T 319-1195 - (T319-1195 This report is issued irregularly. Inquiries about availability of the reports should be addressed to Research Information Division, Department of Intellectual Resources, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, Tokai-mura. Naka-gun, Ibaraki-ken, 319-1195, Japan. ©Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2001 JAERI-Research 2000-059 OSCAAR Calculations for the Iput Dose Reconstruction Scenario ofBIOMASSTheme2 Toshimitsu HOMMA and Takeshi MATSUNAGA Department of Reactor Safety Research Nuclear Safety Research Center Tokai Research Establishment Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute Tokai-mura, Naka-gun, Ibaraki-ken (Received October 27, 2000) This report presents the results obtained from the application of the accident consequence assessment code, called OSCAAR, developed in Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute to the Iput dose reconstruction scenario of BIOMASS Theme 2 organized by International Atomic Energy Agency. The Iput Scenario deals with l37Cs contamination of the catchment basin and agricultural area in the Bryansk Region of Russia, which was heavily contaminated after the Chernobyl accident. This exercise was used to test the chronic exposure pathway models in OSCAAR with actual measurements and to identify the most important sources of uncertainty with respect to each part of the assessment. The OSCAAR chronic exposure pathway models almost successfully reconstructed the whole 10-year time course of l37Cs activity concentrations in most requested types of agricultural products and natural foodstuffs. Modeling of l37Cs downward migration in soils is, however, still incomplete and more detail modeling of the changes of cesium bioavailability with time is needed for long term predictions of the contamination of food.
    [Show full text]