Port River Expressway Opening Bridges
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Adelaide Coastal Waters Information Sheet No. 3
Adelaide Coastal Waters Information Sheet No. 3 Changes in urban environments Issued August 2009 EPA 769/09: This information sheet is part of a series of Fact Sheets on the Adelaide coastal waters and the findings of the Adelaide Coastal Waters Study (ACWS). Introduction Since European settlement in the 1830s, the Adelaide plains and Adelaide’s coastal environment have been subject to considerable change and pressure from a continually increasing population. In recent years there has been growing community concern about the effects of coastal and catchment development on the marine environment. Increases in stormwater flows and waste from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have also been of concern. Nutrients and other pollutants introduced to Adelaide’s nearshore waters from urban and rural runoff, WWTPs and some industrial sources have been found by the Adelaide Coastal Waters Study (ACWS) to have had a negative impact on Adelaide’s nearshore marine environment, including the loss of over 5,000 hectares of seagrass. Historical catchment changes When Adelaide was selected by Colonel William Light for South Australia’s state capital in 1836 there was a wide belt of coastal dunes and wide sandy beaches stretching to the north and south of Glenelg. From Seacliff to Outer Harbor there was a 30 km stretch of sand dunes broken only by the Patawalonga Creek at Glenelg. The Torrens River flowed into a series of swamps lying behind the coastal dunes and drained both north and south to the sea through the Patawalonga Creek and Port River system. The stretch of sand dunes comprised two or more parallel ridges each about 70 to 100 metres wide separated by narrow depressions or swales, consequently very little surface catchment runoff would have reached the coastline. -
Revised Coastal Management Plan 2017-2022
Coastal Management Plans (2017-2022) Semaphore, Largs Bay, Taperoo, Osborne and North Haven Dunes 1 City of Port Adelaide Enfield Coastal Management Plans (2017-2022) City of Port Adelaide Enfield 26 September 2017 Version 3 Prepared by EBS Ecology for the City of Port Adelaide Enfield Document Control Revision Date Date issued Authors Reviewed by Revision type No. Reviewed 1 24/08/2017 A. Derry G. Glazier 24/08/2017 Draft1 2 13/09/2017 A. Derry G. Glazier 12/09/2017 Draft2 3 26/09/2017 A. Derry - - Final Distribution of Copies Revision Date issued Media Issued to No. 1 24/08/2017 Electronic Andy Walker, City of Port Adelaide Enfield 2 13/09/2017 Electronic Andy Walker, City of Port Adelaide Enfield 3 26/09/2017 Electronic Andy Walker, City of Port Adelaide Enfield COPYRIGHT: Use or copying of this document in whole or in part (including photographs) without the written permission of EBS Ecology constitutes an infringement of copyright. LIMITATION: This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of EBS Ecology’s Client, and is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between EBS Ecology and its Client. EBS Ecology accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. CITATION: EBS (2017) Coastal Management Plans (2017-2022). Report to City of Port Adelaide Enfield. EBS Ecology, Adelaide. Coastal Management Plan (2017-2022) – City of Port Adelaide Enfield Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ............................................................................................................................. -
Falls Prevention Service Directory
Falls Prevention Service Directory Central Adelaide Local Health Network June 2012 Welcome to the fifth edition for the Central Adelaide Local Health Network. The Falls Prevention Service Directory has become a must-have resource for health professionals working with older adults who are at risk of falls. Linking individuals to the right services is easier with maps, common referral forms, clear criteria for referral, a decision making tool and alphabetic listings. Central Adelaide Local Health Network primary health services The Central Adelaide Local Health Network (CALHN) provides care for around 420,000 people living in the central metropolitan area of Adelaide as well as providing a number of state-wide services, and services to those in regional areas. More than 3,000 skilled staff provide high quality client care, education, research and health promoting services. The Central Adelaide Local Health Network (CALHN) provides a range of acute and sub acute health services for people of all ages and covers 19 Statistical Local Areas and 10 Local Government Areas and includes the following: > Royal Adelaide Hospital > The Queen Elizabeth Hospital > Hampstead Rehabilitation Centre > St Margaret’s Rehabilitation Hospital > Ambulatory and Primary Health Care (including Super Clinics) > Sub-Acute > Mental Health Services (under the governance of the Adelaide Metro Mental Health Directorate) We are working hard to build a healthy future for South Australia by striving towards our three strategic goals of better health, better care and better services. What is ‘falls prevention’? Falls represent a common and significant problem, especially in our elderly population. Approximately 30% of community-dwelling older persons fall in Australia each year, resulting in significant mortality and morbidity, as well as increased fear of falling and restriction in physical activity. -
Lefevre Peninsula Transport Corridor Project Brochure
OUTCOMES KEY ISSUES MEASURES Safety benefits The combination of an increase of rail traffic Reducing the number of rail level crossings (road along the corridor and the frequency of rail level and rail interfaces) along the rail freight route will crossings will increase the risk of potential significantly improve safety for all transport users. ࠜ conflicts between road and rail. Only one of the existing 18 rail level crossings All seven remaining rail level crossings will are actively protected with warning signals, with receive a safety improvement with the installation the remainder protected by regulatory stop or of automatic signals and boom gates. give way signs. The existing Solvay Road and Mersey Road Safety at the Solvay Road and Mersey Road intersection currently provides priority to traffic intersection at the entrance to Penrice will be along Mersey Road. As a consequence, large greatly improved with the installation of give way vehicles accessing Penrice potentially stop up to signs on Mersey Road, giving priority to Solvay three times at the Mersey Road junction, the Road traffic. railway line and Penrice’s security booth. Improved Currently trains are only capable of travelling up An upgrade of the existing seven kilometres of rail transport to 25 kph along the rail corridor due to the track, including the installation of second parallel combination of the poor condition of the existing track, will enable trains to travel up to 60 kph. efficiency track, the frequency of rail level crossings and the As a result, travel times will be significantly potential conflicts with heavy vehicles. reduced, resulting in reduced operating costs and T ࠜ travel time for rail. -
South Road Superway
SOUTH ROAD SUPERWAY ON THE Way The $842M South Road Superway project will be one of Australia’s largest single investment developments and one of the most complex engineering road projects for any freeway. MAIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES : John Holland, Leed Engineering & Construction PROJECT END VALUE : $842 million COMPLETION : September 2013 ROAD LEGHTH : 4.8km The Australian and South Australian • The northern end of South Road is Governments are working together to being upgraded as it is a key freight improve transport in South Australia. The route for Adelaide’s major export $842 million South Road Superway project generating industries. is the biggest single investment in a South • South Road is the direct link for industrial Australian road project, and so far the state’s transport hubs: Adelaide Airport, most complex engineering road construction Islington Rail Terminal, Port Adelaide project. This project is under a joint venture and Outer Harbour. between John Holland and Leed Engineering & Construction and is the second stage A purpose built casting yard was of the north-south transport corridor implemented for the project and saved the upgrade which provides a 4.8 kilometre transportation of heavy segments by road. non-stop corridor and incorporates a 2.8 Being able to cast the segments as close kilometre elevated roadway. as possible to the piers ensures minimum interruption to traffic. Land was secured Supporting the local economy, the South Road and the Superway casting yard built for this Superway project has provided more than 2000 purpose at 628-638 South Road. jobs and has supported the growth of local businesses. -
Barker Inlet and Port River Estuary System
community water quality program run by NRM Education NRM by run program quality water community • Urban Forest Biodiversity Program Biodiversity Forest Urban • The late Vitas Karnaitis - a volunteer monitoring the estuary as part of the the of part as estuary the monitoring volunteer a - Karnaitis Vitas late The • Project Dolphin Safe Dolphin Project • • Port Adelaide Kaurna community Kaurna Adelaide Port • • Primary Industries and Resources SA (PIRSA) SA Resources and Industries Primary • • City of Salisbury of City • • Environment Protection Authority (EPA) Authority Protection Environment • • Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) Resources Natural and Environment of Department • assistance of the following organisations: following the of assistance Mallala This brochure was produced by NRM Education with the the with Education NRM by produced was brochure This • Cities of Playford, Port Adelaide Enfield, Salisbury and Salisbury Enfield, Adelaide Port Playford, of Cities • • Barker Inlet Port Estuaries Committee (BIPEC) Committee Estuaries Port Inlet Barker • Management Board Management • Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Natural Ranges Lofty Mount and Adelaide • State and local government: local and State • University of South Australia South of University • • University of Adelaide of University • (SARDI) Institute Development and Research Australian South • • Flinders University of South Australia South of University Flinders • Research institutions: Research • Project Dolphin Safe and SA Seabird -
Port River Expressway Cycle Path Detour ADVANCE NOTICE
North-South Corridor Northern Connector Project Port River Expressway cycle path detour ADVANCE NOTICE As a part of the Northern Connector Project, The Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure (DPTI) advises that a new cycle path detour will be in place on the Port River Expressway for the eastbound and westbound routes, between Hanson Road and Globe Derby Drive from late August/early September 2017 to late 2019. This will replace the existing eastbound detour and will enable cyclists to continue to travel safely between these locations during the construction of the new bridge connecting the South Road Superway and the Northern Connector, as part of the Southern Interchange. Advanced notice and directional signage will be in place to direct cyclists along the detour. Please refer to the attached map to plan your journey. A further notification will be issued prior to the detour official opening. Thank you for your patience whilst these important works are undertaken. To assist with planning your cycle journey visit http://maps.sa.gov.au/cycleinstead/. # 11827676 Port River Expressway cycle detour For users eastbound and westbound from TBC 2017 to late 2019 LEGEND P O CYCLE DETOUR EASTBOUND ONLY R T (OPEN FROM TBC 2017 TO LATE 2019) W CYCLE DETOUR WESTBOUND ONLY A (OPEN FROM TBC 2017 TO LATE 2019) K E RAILWAY LINE F Ryans Rd I E L Trotters Dr D R N O Use Globe Derby Dr A existing D Dry Creek Linear Trail Use existing pedestrian access to cross Port Wakefield Rd. Dismount bicycle underneath Salisbury Hwy bridge. Use Pedestrian Start crossing eastbound cycle Vater St detour here. -
Adelaide Dolphin Sanctuary
Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources Adelaide Dolphin Sanctuary Reference Paper 2: Key habitat features necessary to sustain the dolphin population This document is a companion to the Adelaide Dolphin Sanctuary Management Plan and provides background information for the development of the Plan. www.environment.sa.gov.au Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources Reference Paper 2: Habitat Table of Contents 1 Scope and purpose .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Methodology ....................................................................................... 2 1.2 Sufficient food ...................................................................................... 2 1.3 A functioning ecosystem .................................................................... 2 1.4 Physical safety ...................................................................................... 3 1.5 Interconnectedness ............................................................................ 3 1.6 Cumulative impacts ............................................................................ 3 2 Food supply – Follow the fish ............................................................................ 4 2.1 Bottlenose dolphin diet requirements ............................................... 5 2.1.1 ADS dolphins ..................................................................... 5 2.2 Potential threats to food supply ........................................................ -
Traffic Impact Assessment
APPENDIX Q9 Traffic impact assessment See attached Traffic Impact Assessment Report prepared by Arup. Olympic Dam Expansion Draft Environmental Impact Statement 2009 Appendix Q 165 BHP Billiton Olympic Dam Expansion Environmental Impact Statement Traffic Impact Assessment BHP Billiton Olympic Dam Expansion Environmental Impact Statement Traffic Impact Assessment October 2008 Arup This report takes into account the Arup Pty Ltd ABN 18 000 966 165 particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no Arup responsibility is undertaken to any third Level 17 1 Nicholson Street, party Melbourne VIC 3000 Tel +61 3 9668 5500 Fax +61 3 9663 1546 www.arup.com Job number 085200/01 BHP Billiton Olympic Dam Expansion Environmental Impact Statement Traffic Impact Assessment Contents Page Executive Summary i 1 Introduction 1 2 Existing Conditions 5 2.1 Road Network 5 2.2 Road Classification, Responsibilities and Policies 5 2.3 Road Environment 7 2.4 Traffic Data 13 2.5 Baseline Traffic Flows 19 2.6 Future Road Network Improvements 21 2.7 Rail Network 23 2.8 Rail Operations 25 2.9 Crash Analysis 26 3 Proposed Olympic Dam Expansion 32 3.1 Overview 32 3.2 Olympic Dam Site Expansion Heavy Vehicles AADT 33 3.3 Ancillary Traffic AADT 39 3.4 Total AADT 43 3.5 Traffic Movements Between Townships and Olympic Dam 54 3.6 Road Link Level of Service - Impact 60 3.7 Key Intersections, Peak Hour Traffic and Impacts 64 3.8 Over-Dimensional Load Movements and Impacts 66 3.9 Road Safety 81 -
Coastal and Inundation Modelling Phase 3 Report
Item under Separate Cover Item 12.3.1 Attachment 1 Western Adelaide Region Climate Change Adaption Plan Coastal and Inundation Modelling Phase 3 Report City of Charles Sturt City of Port Adelaide Enfield City of West Torrens February 2018 Ref No. 20140329R3C Document Set ID: 11597974 Version: 2, Version Date: 04/03/2020 Document History and Status Rev Description Author Reviewed Approved Date A First Issue PDS KSS 23 March 2017 B Second Issue PDS KSS 30 June 2017 C Minor Amendments – Council KSS KSS 2 February 2018 comments © Tonkin Consulting 2016 This document is, and shall remain, the property of Tonkin Consulting. The document may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. Ref No. 20140329R3B Climate Change Adaptation Plan Phase 3 Report Document Set ID: 11597974 Version: 2, Version Date: 04/03/2020 Executive Summary Background The Western Adelaide Region Councils together with the SA Coast Protection Board, SA Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (DEWNR) and South Australian Fire and Emergency Services Commission (SAFECOM) have developed a regional Climate Change Adaptation Plan for the western suburbs of Adelaide. As a part of this study, Tonkin Consulting have been commissioned to undertake modelling of the impacts of climate change on tidal and storm water flooding around the most vulnerable coastal locations in the Western Region. The investigation has been undertaken in three stages. Stage 1 of the project involved a scoping investigation to identify key assets at highest risk of inundation as a result of climate change. -
Water Quality of the Port River Estuary — a Community Summary
Water Quality of the Port River Estuary — a community summary Government of South Australia INTRODUCTION In September 1995, the EPA began a long-term program to monitor water quality in the Port River estuary. The estuary consists of the Port River, North Arm, Outer Harbor and the Angas and Barker inlets. It is a biologically diverse aquatic ecosystem, supporting extensive saltmarshes, mangrove stands and seagrass beds. This provides varied habitats for many species of birds, fish, crustaceans, and other marine invertebrates, making the estuary an important natural asset. The EPA collects water samples monthly from nine sites across the estuary, measuring 21 different parameters in five categories—nutrients, water clarity, heavy metals, chlorophyll (algae) and microbiology. Water quality data is categorised as good, moderate or poor using a classification system based on national water quality guidelines. The EPA’s first Port River report summarised data from September 1995 to December 1996 (EPA, 1997a), and found the water quality to be mainly Dept. Environment and Heritage Survey 5573 – Oct 1998 Dept. Environment poor to moderate. Aerial view of the Port River estuary This brochure summarises a new report, Ambient water quality in the Port River estuary September 1995–August 2000. Once again, water quality was shown to be poor to moderate for many parameters—only 51% of classifications were good, 31% were moderate, and 18% were poor. Outer Harbor was the best site, with 71% of the parameters classified as good. The five categories analysed Nutrients High nutrient concentrations can lead to excessive algal and plant growth, causing fish deaths and smothering seagrasses and other plants. -
Buckland Park – Traffic Impact Assessment
Buckland Park Traffic Impact Assessment 1 April 2009 Walker Corporation Parsons Brinckerhoff Australia Pty Limited ABN 80 078 004 798 Level 16 1 King William Street 101 Pirie Street Adelaide SA 5000 GPO Box 398 Adelaide SA 5001 Australia Telephone +61 8 8405 4300 Facsimile +61 8 8405 4301 Email [email protected] 08-0875-04-2112592A NCSI Certified Quality System ISO 9001, ISO 14001, AS/NZS4801 ©Parsons Brinckerhoff Australia Pty Limited (PB) [2009]. Copyright in the drawings, information and data recorded in this document (the information) is the property of PB. This document and the information are solely for the use of the authorised recipient and this document may not be used, copied or reproduced in whole or part for any purpose other than that for which it was supplied by PB. PB makes no representation, undertakes no duty and accepts no responsibility to any third party who may use or rely upon this document or the information. Author: Gordon Benham, Sharon Billinger, Daniel Keller ......................... Signed: ..................................................................................................... Reviewer: S Lewis ......................................................................................... Signed: ..................................................................................................... Approved by: G Benham .................................................................................... Signed: ....................................................................................................