DOCSLIB.ORG

Riverhead Solar 2 1001.24 Exhibit 24 Visual Impacts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Riverhead Solar 2 1001.24 Exhibit 24 Visual Impacts Riverhead Solar 2 Case No. 17-F-0655 1001.24 Exhibit 24 Visual Impacts EXHIBIT 24 Riverhead Solar 2, LLC Riverhead Solar 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS VISUAL IMPACTS .....................................................................................................................................1 (a) Visual Impact Assessment............................................................................................................................ 1 (1) Character and Visual Quality of the Existing Landscape .......................................................................... 3 (2) Visibility of the Facility .............................................................................................................................. 9 (3) Visibility of Overhead Transmission and Collection Lines ...................................................................... 10 (4) Appearance of the Facility Upon Completion ......................................................................................... 10 (5) Lighting ................................................................................................................................................... 12 (6) Photographic Overlays (Simulations) ..................................................................................................... 12 (7) Nature and Degree of Visual Change from Construction ....................................................................... 12 (8) Nature and Degree of Visual Change from Operation ............................................................................ 13 (9) Operational Effects of the Facility ........................................................................................................... 15 (10) Measures to Mitigate for Visual Impacts ................................................................................................ 16 (11) Description of Visual Resources to be Affected ..................................................................................... 19 (b) Viewshed Analysis ...................................................................................................................................... 20 (1) Viewshed Maps ...................................................................................................................................... 21 (2) Viewshed Map Methodology .................................................................................................................. 25 (3) Sensitive Viewing Areas ......................................................................................................................... 27 (4) Viewpoint Selection ................................................................................................................................ 30 (5) Photographic simulations ....................................................................................................................... 31 (6) Simulation Rating and Assessment of Visual Impact ............................................................................. 37 (7) Visible Effects Created by the Facility .................................................................................................... 40 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................................... 44 LIST OF TABLES Table 24-1. Landscape Similarity Zones by Total Area in 1-Mile Study Area ................................................................6 Table 24-2. Example Albedo Values for Various Materials (Source Mertens, 2018) ................................................... 15 Table 24-3. Summary of PV Panel Viewshed Results for the Visual Study Area1 ...................................................... 22 Table 24-4. Summary of PV Panel Visibility by LSZ ................................................................................................... 23 Table 24-5. Cumulative Viewshed Analysis Results ................................................................................................... 25 Table 24-6. Visually Sensitive Resources Identified Within the Visual Study Area ..................................................... 27 Table 24-7. Visually Sensitive Resources with Potential Visibility of the Facility ......................................................... 29 Table 24-8. Summary of Rating Panel Review of Visual Simulations ......................................................................... 38 Table 24-9. Visual Mitigation Influence on Contrast Ratings ....................................................................................... 40 EXHIBIT 24 Riverhead Solar 2, LLC Page ii Riverhead Solar 2 VISUAL IMPACTS (a) Visual Impact Assessment On behalf of the Applicant, Environmental Design & Research, Landscape Architecture, Engineering & Environmental Services, D.P.C. (EDR) has conducted a Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) to determine the extent and significance of the proposed Facility’s visual impacts. The VIA methodology and content are consistent with the policies, procedures, and guidelines contained in 16 NYCRR § 1001.24 and the general visual assessment methodologies used by state and federal agencies (NYSDEC, 2019; Sullivan & Meyer, 2014; United States Department of Agriculture [USDA] Forest Service, 1995; United States Department of the Interior [USDI] Bureau of Land Management [BLM], 1984). Components of the VIA include characterization of the existing landscape, identification of Visually Sensitive Resources (VSRs), viewshed mapping, confirmatory fieldwork, visual simulations, visual impact analysis, cumulative visual impact analysis, and proposed visual impact mitigation. The overall VIA process is outlined in Inset 24.1 and discussed in detail below: EXHIBIT 24 Riverhead Solar 2, LLC Page 1 Riverhead Solar 2 Inset 24.1 – VIA Process EXHIBIT 24 Riverhead Solar 2, LLC Page 2 Riverhead Solar 2 (1) Character and Visual Quality of the Existing Landscape Overview Per the requirements set forth in Stipulation 24, the Visual Study Area (VSA) for the proposed Facility is defined as the area within one mile of any Facility components, as depicted in Figure 24-1. Within the VSA, all known VSRs of national, regional, statewide, and local importance have been identified [see Section (a)(11) of this Exhibit], and all portions of the VSA have been categorized into Landscape Similarity Zones (LSZs), as discussed in detail in Section (a)(1)(ii) of this Exhibit and illustrated in Figure 24-2. Representative images of each LSZ are included in Figure 24-3. Prominent landscape features located within the VSA include Calverton Executive Airpark, which is located in the southwest portion of the VSA, a 2-mile long section of Interstate Route 495 (I-495) which runs through the southeastern portion of the VSA, and several existing large solar facilities. Peconic Lake and the associated Peconic River also occur in the southeastern portion of the VSA, generally running parallel with I-495. Land use within the VSA is dominated by commercial sod farming, industrial uses, and single-family residences. Notable residential settlements occur in the hamlet of Calverton, at the intersection of State Route 25 and Edwards Avenue, along sections of Riley Avenue in the northern portion of the VSA, and west of Fresh Pond Avenue in the northwestern portion of the VSA. NYS Route 25 is the main commercial corridor within the VSA and hosts a gravel pit operation, gas stations, landscape centers, and a few larger business parks which are situated in the eastern portion of the VSA. A large water park recreation center is located near the I-495 and State Route 25 interchange. Beyond these developed areas, the remaining portions and the majority of the VSA consists of open fields, forests, and widely-space rural residences. There are also four existing solar facilities within the VSA, including Riverhead Solar 1 (RH1) to the west, STR Systems (STR) to the east, and the Sutter and Sterlington solar facilities (SSF) to the south of the proposed Riverhead 2 Solar Facility. Topography within the majority of the VSA is relatively flat with elevations ranging from approximately 17 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) at Peconic Lake to approximately 154 feet AMSL in the forested hills a short distance south of Peconic Lake. The remainder of the VSA is generally between 50 and 70 feet AMSL. Prominent topographic features are not evident within in the VSA and therefore, do not contribute to the visual character of the landscape. User Groups Local Residents This user group includes those who live and work within the VSA. These individuals generally view the landscape from their yards, homes, local roads, schools, and places of employment. Residents are EXHIBIT 24 Riverhead Solar 2, LLC Page 3 Riverhead Solar 2 concentrated along the main thoroughfares, such as State Route 25, and in residential developments along Riley Avenue and Hill Rise Road. However, residents occur in relatively low density throughout the VSA. Except when involved in local travel, residents are likely to be stationary and have frequent or prolonged views of the landscape. Local residents may view the landscape from ground level or elevated viewpoints (typically upper floors/stories of homes). Residents’ sensitivity to visual quality is variable. However, it is assumed that local residents may be very sensitive to changes in views from their homes, yards, and community gathering places. Through-Travelers/Commuters
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Permeable Shoulders with Stone Reservoirs
    Permeable Shoulders With Stone Reservoirs Requested by: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Standing Committee on the Environment Prepared by: David K. Hein, P.Eng. Principal Investigator Applied Research Associates, Inc. 100 Trade Center Boulevard, Suite 200 Champaign, Illinois 61820 and Eric Strecker, P.E., Aaron Poresky, P.E. and Dr. Robert Roseen, P.E. Geosyntec Consultants Marie Venner Venner Consulting (October 4, 2013) The information contained in this report was prepared as part of NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 82, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board. SPECIAL NOTE: This report IS NOT an official publication of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, or The National Academies. Page | ii Acknowledgements This study was requested by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), and conducted as part of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 25-25. The NCHRP is supported by annual voluntary contributions from the state Departments of Transportation. Project 25-25 is intended to fund quick response studies on behalf of the AASHTO Standing Committee on the Environment. The report was prepared by David K. Hein, P.Eng. and Lori Schaus, P.Eng. of Applied Research Associates, Inc., Eric Strecker, P.E., Aaron Poresky, P.E. and Dr. Robert Roseen, P.E. of Geosyntec Consultants and Marie Venner of Venner Consulting. The work was guided by a task group co-chaired by Frannie Brindle, Oregon DOT and Scott McGowen, California DOT. The project was managed by Nanda Srinivasan, NCHRP Senior Program Officer. The panel for this project included: Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation & Infrastructure
    TRANSPORTATION & INFRASTRUCTURE June XX, 20XX TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Public and Private Transportation Networks 1 Existing Conditions 11 Traffic Operations 12 Future Transportation Systems Needs and Opportunities 18 Goals and Objectives 18 Goal 1: Reduce Traffic Congestion During Peak Tourist Season 20 Goal 2: Reduce Future Traffic Congestion Due to Development 21 Goal 3: Increase Pedestrian, Cyclist, and Traffic Safety 22 Goal 4: Expand Bicycle Network 22 Goal 5: Monitor Aviation Traffic and Airport Expansion 22 Goal 6: Improve Curbside Management Practices 23 Goal 7: Manage Effects of Ferry Ridership on Traffic 23 Infrastructure 23 Existing Conditions 30 Goals and Objectives 30 Goal 1: Reduce Stormwater 31 Goal 2: Complete Existing Sanitary Sewer System 31 Goal 3: Evaluate Town Water Supply 31 Goal 4: Work with Local Service Provider for Energy Needs See next page for list of tables and figures. LIST OF TABLES & FIGURES Tables 4.1 | Average Annual Daily Traffic – State Route 25 and County Route 48 Figures 4.1 | Ownership of Streets in the Southold Town 4.2 | Percent of Sidewalk Miles in the Town of Southold by Hamlet 4.3 | Gaps in Sidewalk Network in Town of Southold 4.4 | Percent of Multi-Use Path Miles by Hamlet in Town of Southold 4.5 | Bicycle Routes in Town of Southold 4.6 | Daily Traffic Volumes in Town of Southold 4.7 | Crash Locations and High-Crash Intersections in Town of Southold 4.8 | Existing and Potential Future Daily Traffic Generated by Development in Commercial and Industrial Zoning Districts in the Town of Southold 4.9 | Stormwater Infrastructure in the Town of Southold 4.10 | Sewer District Boundaries and Parcels Connected to Sewer System 4.11 | SCWA Water Main Miles in the Town of Southold by Hamlet TRANSPORTATION & INFRASTRUCTURE most streets are publicly owned: 54 percent by the PUBLIC AND PRIVATE Town, 7 percent by the County, 7 percent by the TRANSPORTATION State, and 3 percent (all on Plum Island) by the federal government.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Elmont Ny
    Directions To Elmont Ny Niggling Shay strook retail or reopens blisteringly when Abdul is cut-rate. Pennie often buzzes woozily when typal Fabian plods perfectly and false-cards her singe. Is Damien stylised or unmaterial after prothoracic Tore Germanized so delightedly? Please choose a registered email, elmont ny about potential employment with respect and has been there accessible roads that you a toleration of hempstead turnpike in seeking counseling How long it it take to him from Elmont New York to Stamford Connecticut View a map with team drive service between Elmont NY and Stamford CT to plan. Tire Shops with wrong Tire Prices near village in Elmont NY Mavis Discount date is. Parking Elmont Town of Hempstead. Directions From one North I-495 WestLong Island Expressway toward New York Exit 31N-S. We are accepted. Locations Elmont Cardinals. Elmont Nassau County Elmont Nassau County 314 Elmont Rd Elmont NY 11003 516 352-1311 Map Directions Contact us to get started Name First. Updated Zip Code 11003 Profile Map and Demographics. Hours and Directions for rescue Aid Pharmacy 14 15. Everyone was very affordable for the review and north hempstead were browsing activity for the therapist should adjust as a particular unit. Choosing the directions to them access this eponymous dish is located in the stone meeting house are few extra office equipment. Elmont Memorial Library Home. This month of columbia, and sewanhaka central council of live traffic monitors or mobile app. Pick up with applicable laws and southeast queens county communities including potential employment with rockaway nissan models and responsive process by giving you could be.
    [Show full text]
  • County of Suffolk S-1
    SUFFOLK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION c/o Suffolk County Department of Economic Development & Planning 100 Veterans Memorial Highway, PO Box 6100, Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 T: (631) 853-5192 F: (631) 853-4044 Joanne Minieri, Deputy County Executive and Commissioner, Department of Economic Development and Planning Sarah Lansdale, Director of Planning Notice of Meeting P L E A S E N O T E C H A N G E O F L O C A T I O N October 1, 2014 at 1:00 p.m. Maxine S. Postal Auditorium Evans K. Griffing Building, Riverhead County Center 300 Center Drive Riverhead, New York 11901 Tentative Agenda Includes: 1. Swearing in of new member – Samuel Kramer 2. Meeting Summary for June 2014 and August 2014 3. Public Portion 4. Chairman’s Report 5. Director’s Report 6. Guest Speaker • Supervisor Sean Walter, Town of Riverhead 7. Section A 14-14 thru A 14-23 & A 14-25 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code • Draft Lawrence Aviation Land Use Plan (Brookhaven) SCTM No: 0200-13600-0200-022000 et al. • CR39 Corridor Land Use Plan (Southampton) • Moratoriums on building Permits and Approvals (Inc. Village of Southampton) 8. Section A-14-24 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code • Enterprise Park at Calverton (Riverhead) SCTM No: 0600-66000-0400-01001 9. Other Business: Consideration of municipal Geothermal Model code Consideration of municipal Public Security Design Code NOTE: The next meeting of the SUFFOLK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION will be held on November 5 2014 at 2:00 p.m.at the Maxine S. Postal Auditorium Evans K.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Character
    CHAPTER 5 COMMUNITY CHARACTER February 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Background 1 Goals and Objectives 1 Goal 1: Protect Scenic Resources 6 Goal 2: Protect Cultural Resources 11 Goal 3: Preserve Quality of Life 12 Goal 4: Protect Natural Heritage 13 Goal 5: Protect the Unique Character of Individual Hamlets CHAPTER 5 | COMMUNITY CHARACTER Figures 5.1 | Cultural Resources Map 5 | COMMUNITY CHARACTER ounded in 1640, Southold is one of New York State’s the Corchaug Indians and the first settlers organized a F oldest English-speaking colonies. Historically, the church. Written records of the Town begin in 1651. development patterns of the Town were guided by As trade with New England and the West Indies devel- agriculture and maritime industries centered on water- oped, flax and tobacco farming flourished, beginning ways and overland transportation routes. The Town’s an agricultural tradition that continues to this day. character is anchored in the scenic quality of its bucolic Southold was also an important commercial fishing built environment and its landscapes and waterscapes. town and that industry remains an important part of As voiced by the community, maintaining the quality of the Town’s identity. life within the Town is paramount. When the Long Island Rail Road was completed to Greenport in 1844, the North Fork became less isolated and summer visitors began to arrive. Later, Menhaden fisheries and oyster and scallop harvesting replaced whaling in the local economy and the original settlers sold their farms to European immigrants. During World Wars I and II, local shipyards experienced boom times that were followed by an economic decline.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary State Corps District Project Name Work Description
    American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Army Corps of Engineers - Civil Works Investigations Planned Primary Corps District Project Name Work Description - as of 5 January 10 Allocation State ($) Issue contract for State of Alaska Regional Harbor AK Alaska Alaska Regional Ports, AK 240,000 Development Study Award contract for hydraulic analysis and participation AK Alaska Anchorage Harbor Deepening, AK 150,000 in ship simulation modeling. Award contract for design analysis to include wave AK Alaska Kenai River Bluff Erosion, AK 300,000 hindcast and revetment design Award contract for economic analysis, environmental AK Alaska Little Diomede Harbor, AK 250,000 studies and geotechnical investigations Issue contracts for airborne laser mapping surveys in conjunction with US Geologic Survey, wetlands AK Alaska Matanuska River Watershed, AK mapping in conjunction with Fish and Wildlife Service, 372,000 wetlands delineation assessment, and data gap analysis. Fully obligate incrementally funded Architect/Engineer Va Shly-Ay Akimel Salt River contract to complete final Plans and Specifications and AZ Los Angeles 645,000 Restoration, AZ the Detailed Design Report for the first construction contract award on Phase 1 of the project. Fully funded Architect/Engineer contract to complete CA Los Angeles Carpinteria Shoreline Study, CA the draft Environmental Impact Statement associated 130,000 with the Feasibility Report. Complete Independent Technical Review and fund Coast of CA, South Coast Region (Los CA Los Angeles Architect Engineer contract to complete draft Final 162,258 Angeles Co) Report Fully fund Architect/Engineer contract to prepare plans CA Los Angeles Lower Mission Creek, CA and specifications for the construction on the lower half 600,000 of project Award an option for the High Flow Bypass Facility CA Los Angeles Matilija Dam, CA 250,000 Design.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Master Plan Village of Mineola Nassau County, New York
    Comprehensive Master Plan for the Village of Mineola Prepared for The Village of Mineola by the Mineola Community Planning Committee with Phillips Preiss Shapiro Associates, Inc., Planning and Real Estate Consultants November 2005 Comprehensive Master Plan Village of Mineola Nassau County, New York Prepared for The Village of Mineola Prepared by Mineola Community Planning Committee with Phillips Preiss Shapiro Associates, Inc. Planning and Real Estate Consultants 434 Sixth Avenue New York, New York 10011 November 2005 i ii Village of Mineola Board of Trustees Other Participating Elected Officials Mayor Jack M. Martins State Senator Michael A.L. Balboni Deputy Mayor Lawrence A. Werther State Assemblywoman Maureen O’Connell Trustee Paul S. Cusato US Representative Carolyn McCarthy Trustee Linda Fairgrieve County Legislator Richard J. Nicolello Trustee John S. DaVanzo Consultants John M. Spellman, Esq., Village Attorney Phillips Preiss Shapiro Associates, Inc. Joseph R. Scalero, Village Clerk Kenneth Bowers, Paul Grygiel, Elizabeth Jordan, Thomas J. Rini, Superintendent of Public Works Namiko Kimura, Nicole Ogg, John Richkus, Tracy Mineola Community Planning Committee Sayegh, John Shapiro EDAW Acknowledgments Robert W. Hinck, Sr., Chair/Traffic Circulation, Norman Mintz Associates Parking Subcommittee Chair, Heritage Spellman Rice Schure Gibbons McDonough & Subcommittee Chair Polizzi, LLP George Durham, Downtown Revitalization Subcommittee Chair Jacqueline Carway, Corridors and Neighborhoods Subcommittee Chair The Mayor and Trustees of the
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Riverhead Peconic River/Route 25 Corridor
    TOWN OF RIVERHEAD PECONIC RIVER/ROUTE 25 CORRIDOR Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA) Step II Nomination Study Creative Placemaking Supplement Town of Riverhead Suffolk County, New York Prepared by: WaterFire International 101 Regent Avenue Providence, RI 02908 March 2016 This document was prepared for the Town of Riverhead and the New York State Department of State with state funds provided through the Brownfield Opportunity Areas Program. Town of Riverhead, Peconic River, NY Table of Contents General BOA Introduction .................................................................................................... 7 Lead Project Sponsors........................................................................................................... 7 Project Overview and Description ........................................................................................ 8 Creative Placemaking Plan Recommendations for Riverhead ................................................. 10 What is Creative Placemaking? .......................................................................................... 10 0.1.1 Introduction: .............................................................................................................. 10 0.1.2 Recommendations Cover Seven Areas of Interest .................................................... 12 0.1.3 Enhancing Community Corridors for the Town of Riverhead ................................. 13 0.1.4 Recommendations for Downtown: Main St., Grangebel & River Walk area: ........ 16 0.1.4.1 Creation of
    [Show full text]
  • April 12, 2021 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Hon. Michelle L. Phillips
    April 12, 2021 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Hon. Michelle L. Phillips Secretary to the Commission New York State Public Service Commission 3 Empire State Plaza Albany, NY 12223-1350 RE: Case 20-T-0617: Application of Sunrise Wind LLC for a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and Public Need for the Construction of Up to 6.2 Miles (320 kilovolt [kV]) of Direct Current (DC) Submarine Export Cable from the New York State Territorial Waters Boundary to the Smith Point County Park on Fire Island in the Town of Brookhaven in Suffolk County and Up to 17.5 Miles (320 kV) of Onshore Transmission Cable from the Landfall at Fire Island to a New Onshore Converter Station in the Town of Brookhaven and Up to 1 Mile (138 kV) of Alternating Current (AC) Onshore Interconnection Cable Connecting to the Existing Holbrook Substation in the Town of Brookhaven in Suffolk County Dear Secretary Phillips: On December 9, 2020, Sunrise Wind LLC (“Sunrise Wind”) filed an application (the “Application”) with the New York State Public Service Commission (the “Commission”) pursuant to Public Service Law (“PSL”) Article VII to secure a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and Public Need (“CECPN”) to construct, operate, and maintain the Sunrise Wind New York Cable Project (the “Project”).1 On February 28, 2021, you issued a letter in this proceeding identifying certain deficiencies that need to be addressed before the Application can be deemed in compliance with PSL Article VII.2 In addition, since the Application was filed, Sunrise Wind has made certain modifications to the Project (e.g., a route refinement and site selection).
    [Show full text]
  • Current Research in New York Archaeology: A.D. 700–1300
    Current Research in New York Archaeology: A.D. 700–1300 EDITED BY Christina B. Rieth and John P. Hart NEW YORK STATE MUSEUM RECORD 2 The New York State Museum is a program of The University of the State of New York The State Education Department l Office of Cultural Education THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Regents of The University MERRYL H. TISCH, Chancellor, B.A., M.A., Ed.D. ...................................................... New York MILTON L. COFIELD, Vice Chancellor, B.S., M.B.A., Ph.D. Rochester OBERT ENNETT R M. B , Chancellor Emeritus, B.A., M.S. ................................................. Tonawanda JAMES C. DAWSON, A.A., B.A., M.S., Ph.D. ........................................................... Plattsburgh ANTHONY S. BOTTAR, B.A., J.D. Syracuse GERALDINE D. CHAPEY, B.A., M.A., Ed.D. Belle Harbor HARRY PHILLIPS, 3RD, B.A., M.S.F.S. Hartsdale AMES ALLON R J R. T ,J ., B.A., M.A. ................................................................... Binghamton ROGER TILLES,B.A.,J.D............................................................................ Great Neck HARLES ENDIT C R. B , B.A. .......................................................................... Manhattan BETTY A. ROSA, B.A., M.S. in Ed., M.S. in Ed., M.Ed., Ed.D. ............................................ Bronx ESTER OUNG R L W. Y ,J ., B.S., M.S., Ed. D. Oakland Gardens CHRISTINE D. CEA, B.A., M.A., Ph.D. Staten Island ADE ORWOOD W S. N ,B.A........................................................................... Rochester JAMES O. JACKSON, B.S., M.A., PH.D. Albany ATHLEEN ASHIN K M. C , B.S., M.S., Ed.D.. Brooklyn JAMES E. COTTRELL, B.S., M.D. New York Commissioner of Education President of The University of the State of New York JOHN B.
    [Show full text]
  • Nassau County Comprehensive Plan
    NASSAU COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN NASSAU COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 1998 NASSAU COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Final 1998 NASSAU COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NASSAU COUNTY, NEW YORK The County Government Law of Nassau County (otherwise known as the Nassau County Charter) was revised in 1994 to include various provisions, including establishment of the County Legislature. One of the provisions of the County Charter in Article XVI, Section 1604, Planning Department, states that the Nassau County Planning Commission has primary responsibility for developing and adopting a County comprehensive master plan, and updating it at least every five years: “…the County Planning Commission shall, no later than January first, nineteen hundred ninety-nine, prepare and adopt a comprehensive master plan for the development of the entire area of the county, which shall include studies and recommendations regarding highways and transportation, economic development, parks, public water supply, air quality, solid waste disposal, historic preservation, wastewater treatment, open space preservation, environmental conservation, future land use and availability of housing. … Nothing herein shall be construed as limiting or diminishing the powers and authority of the several towns, cities and villages within the County to exercise, amend and enforce their own zoning and land use codes and local laws and to publish and adopt a comprehensive plan limited to such town, city or village.” Nassau County Comprehensive Plan Adopted by the Nassau County Planning Commission on December 15, 1998 NASSAU COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Thomas S. Gulotta Paul F. Ponessa Nassau County Executive Director Nassau County Planning Commission (1998) Lloyd Smallwood, Jr. (May 1978 - August 1998) Ronald Kadin, Acting Chairman Joann R.
    [Show full text]
  • Vc.HRP Synthesis 27C
    - vc.HRP Synthesis 27c [ -ç IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT;- I RESEARCH LIBRARY L 4 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVECOMMIUEE 1999 - Officers Chair: WAYNE SHACKELFORD, Commissioner; Georgia DOT Vice Chairman: MARTIN WACHS, Director; University of California Transportation Center; University of California at Berkeley Executive Director: ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR., Transportation Research Board Members SHARON D. BANKS, Genera! Manager, AC Transit (Past Chairwoman, 1998) THOMAS F. BARRY, JR., Secretary of Transportaiioñ, Florida DOT BRIAN J. L. BERRY, Lloyd Vie! Berkner Regental Professor; University of Texas at Dallas SARAH C. CAMPBELL, President, TransManagement, inc., Washington, D. C. ANNE P. CAN BY, Secretary of Transportation, Delaware DOT E. DEAN CARLSON, Secretary, Kansas DOT JOANNE F. CASEY, President, intermodal Association of North America, Greenbelt, Maryland JOHN W. FISHER, Joseph T Stuart Professor of Civil Engineering and Director; ATL.SS Engineering Research Center; Lehigh University GORMAN GILBERT, Director; institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University DELON HAMPTON. Chairman & CEO, Delon Hampton & Associates, Washington, D.C. LESTER A. HOEL, LA. Lacy Distinguished Professor; Civil Engineering, University of Virginia JAMES L. LAMMIE, Director; Parsons Brinckerhoff inc., New York, New York THOMAS F. LARWIN, General Manager; San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board BRADLEY L. MALLORY, Secretary of Transportation, Pennsylvania DOT JEFFREY J. McCAIG, President and CEO, Trimac Corporation, Calgary, Alberta, Canada MARSHALL W. MOORE, Director; North Dakota DOT JEFFREY R. MORELAND, Senior VP Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation SED MORRISON, Secretary of Transportation, Washington State DOT JOHN P. POORMAN, Staff Director; Capital District Transportation Committee ANDREA RINTKER. Executive Director; Port of Tacoma; Washington JOHN M. SAMUELS, VP-Operations Planning & Budget, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk, Virginia CHARLES H.
    [Show full text]