Agaves of Arizona

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Agaves of Arizona RON PARKER Agaves of Arizona part II While the first Agaves of Arizona installment featured naturally occurring Agaves definitively placed in one subgenus (Agave) or the other (Littaea), our second installment continues with a venture into the somewhat more tenuous realm of naturally occurring hybrids and anthropogenic (literally, man-made) cultivars, in other words, the fun stuff! A peek back at Part I in vol. 89-6 might lend a sense of continuity, as reference is made to several taxa previously discussed. Please note that range maps exclusively represent sites we have personally vis- ited and documented. Naturally Occurring Hybrid Agaves Agaves hybridize wherever they meet, provided they have overlapping bloom times and pollinators. There are three named hybrids in Arizona, and each is a cross between one of the first group (Agave Aga- ves) with one of the second (Littaea Agaves), resulting in progeny that look quite different from either par- ent. In each case, these hybrid Agaves are extreme- ly rare. Many additional habitat hybrids, which bear some resemblance to one parent or the other, remain undescribed more times than not. Agave ×arizonica was originally discovered in the 1. Agave ×arizonica, one of only two known examples 1960s, and Howard Scott Gentry himself apparent- in habitat. ly failed to realize he had come across the naturally occurring hybrid, A. chrysantha × A. toumeyana, instead aligning the taxon with A. utahensis, presumably due to a similar racemose inflorescence. This may be the world’s rarest named Agave, as we know of only two living examples in habitat, miles apart in very remote sections of the New River Mountains (Fig. 1). A. ×ari- zonica seems poorly adapted to the harsh envi- ronment in which its parents reside. Sun and heat don’t seem at issue, but inadequate hydra- tion resulting from prolonged drought condi- tions has taken an unfortunate toll on habitat populations since its discovery. Though scarce in habitat, it offsets freely when adequate- ly watered in cultivation, and is frequently available from Desert Botanical Garden plant sales, and less commonly at nurseries. It is an extremely attractive small Agave, equally at home when cultivated in ground or containers. We have found a single example of a back- crossed Agave ×arizonica × A. toumeyana var. bella in habitat (Fig. 2). 2. Agave ×arizonica × A. toumeyana var. bella habitat hybrid. 20 Author Copy CACTUS AND SUCCULENT JOURNAL delicate and vulnerable, with nar- row leaves and no protective mar- ginal spines. Unlike its seed donor parent, leaves are not filiferous. When cultivated, A. schottii var. treleasei offsets prolifically, and is available in the retail nursery cir- cuit from time to time. Agave ×ajoensis is also rare, found only at a single locale at Organ Pipe National Monument in extreme southern Arizona, where A. deserti var. simplex and A. schottii share habitat. Once con- sidered conspecific with A. schottii var. treleasei, A. ×ajoensis was dis- covered to be distinct, and sub- sequently described by Wendy C. Hodgson (2001). Not surprisingly, it looks a great deal like A. schot- tii var. treleasei, only much lighter in color. Unfortunately, it is very diffi- cult to find in the trade, and the only known habitat population is currently under siege from eri- ophyid mites. This pernicious 3. Distribution of hybrid Agave in Arizona: A. ×arizonica ●, microscopic scourge scars leaf sur- A. schottii var. treleasii ●, A. ×ajoensis ●. faces, interferes with reproduction, and even kills its hosts. Agave ×ajoensis is known to back-cross with A. deserti var. simplex. 4. Agave schottii var. treleasii from the Santa Catalina Mountains. Agave schottii var. treleasei, currently considered a variety of A. schottii, is actually an A. schottii × A. chry- santha hybrid. It is nearly as scarce as A. ×arizoni- ca in habitat, growing in a few small clumps in the Santa Catalina Mountains near Tucson (Figs. 3 & 4). 5. Agave ×ajoensis growing in Organ Pipe National This 35–55 cm dark green Agave actually looks rather Monument. 2018 VOLUME 90 NUMBER 1 Author Copy 21 Domesticated Agaves There are five named Agave taxa in Arizona, which we consider pre-Columbian cultivars. We associate these Agaves with indigenous pre- Columbian Native Americans, who presumably hybridized, selected, gardened and farmed these plants as sources of food, fiber, beverage, and building material, among other things. All feature a paniculate inflo- rescence. These Agaves are either sterile or reproductive- ly compromised, and many are still growing right where they were planted some 700–1000 years ago. Some may be sterile, but all offset prodigiously. Pre-Columbian culti- vars are really a lot of fun to chase out in habitat, because they’re always found near archeological sites, usually in small groups of three to thirty plants, almost always between 750–1500 m elevation along flats or gentle slopes, in what 6. Distribution of domesticated Agave in Arizona: A. murpheyi ●, generally present as garden A. delamarteri ●, A. phillipsiana ●, A. verdensis ●, A. yavapaiensis ●. settings (Fig. 6). Oft times, we’ll encounter terraces or an ancient dwelling, then look for associated Agaves, or perhaps just the reverse. To date we have found more than 330 such sites across Ari- zona, many of which were previously unknown. Once we grasped the concept of an intelligence behind their locales, we had a far easier time ferreting them out — best Easter egg hunt ever. Agave murpheyi is the very first Arizona Agave recognized as a pre-Columbian cultivar, associat- ed with indigenous Native Americans. This came to light as botanists and archeologists collaborated in the mid-1980s to uncover an association with ancient Hohokam archeological sites. Of A. murpheyi, Gentry (1952) writes "some of the clones appear to have been associated with old Indian living sites", so he may have suspected its status as domesticated, but appar- ently wasn't ready to commit, probably for lack of evi- Agave murpheyi from the Lake Pleasant area. dence at the time he penned his great tome. 7. 22 Author Copy CACTUS AND SUCCULENT JOURNAL 8. Hohokam archeological site high above an Agave murpheyi patch. Outside the valley, A. murpheyi is rare and near- ly unknown, but in the Phoenix area groups of these 80–110 cm plants with ascending, dark green leaves are a common sight, often gracing medians and park- ways, rather like A. palmeri is utilized in the Tucson area. We have found A. murpheyi at Sierra Ancha, the Tonto Creek area, and close to the Mexican border, where it was reportedly once prevalent, but most are now found around Lake Pleasant and the New River area in startlingly harsh habitat that would turn many Agaves to ash (Fig. 7). It is the only Arizona pre- Columbian cultivar not endemic to our state, having also been found at several sites in northern Mexico. Not sterile, but reproductively compromised, A. murpheyi does produce small quantities of seed, along with copious numbers of bulbils, small plantlets that develop directly on bloom stalks (Fig. 9). Sim- ilar appearance and bulbil production have long led to speculation that A. murpheyi may be an A. angusti- folia hybrid, which reports of recent next-generation sequencing analysis conducted by Andrew Salywon Agave murpheyi bulbils. and Wendy Hodgson (2013) of the Desert Botanical 9. Garden apparently confirm. Other parts of the mur- pheyi equation remain a mystery, but look toward at Agave murpheyi is known to hybridize with A. least one putative parent that contributed cold hardi- chrysantha. ness to the mix. 2018 VOLUME 90 NUMBER 1 Author Copy 23 10. Agave delamateri from the heart of Salado country. A second Arizona pre-Columbian cultivar, Agave delamateri, was officially added to our catalog by Wendy Hodgson and Liz Slauson (1995). Original- ly discovered by Susan D. McKelvey, and named A. repanda by famed botanist William Trelease in 1929, he declined to publish for reasons unknown, and the ghosted taxon was subsequently misidentified by Gentry, who at one time considered it synonymous with A. palmeri, and A. chrysantha at another. A. delamateri is the most common of the Arizona pre-Columbian cultivars, in fact far more common than all others combined. From another perspective, it is actually more common than eight of the seventeen species considered in this catalog. To date we have found it at more than 200 sites, and believe there are still more waiting to be discovered. It’s a mid-sized Agave, 70–100 cm, with an upright posture, blue and banded (Fig. 11), associated primarily with ancient Salado Native Americans in and around the Roosevelt 11. Agave delamateri with sharply ascending leaves. Lake region (Fig. 10). A delamateri is also found at Sierra Ancha and the Verde Valley. Although seed sterile, Agave delamateri does pro- This is a really tough Agave, often found in harsh, duce pollen, and has been found to hybridize with low elevation locales where other Agaves might per- A. chrysantha and A. murpheyi, although A. murpheyi ish. It is sterile, but offsets freely and has been culti- hybrids are a likely product of ancient Salado hor- vated by the Desert Botanical Garden for quite some ticultural intervention. We may have found A. dela- time, and they occasionally offer it for sale. A delama- materi × A. verdensis hybrids as well, but this remains teri is also found at Sierra Ancha and the Verde Valley. unconfirmed. 24 Author Copy CACTUS AND SUCCULENT JOURNAL 12. Sinagua cliff dwelling, associated with several Agave phillipsiana patches country near Sedona and south of Prescott. Quite similar to A. delamateri, A. phil- lipsiana seems more closely aligned with the ancient Sinagua culture than the Sal- ado (Fig. 12). Like its close cousin, it is sterile and boasts an expansive distribu- tion range, though it is far less com- mon.
Recommended publications
  • Supplemental Botany Report
    United States Department of Agriculture Supplemental Botany Forest Service Specialist Report Southwestern Region November 2013 Coconino Forest Plan Revision DEIS Submitted by: __/s/ _________________________ Debra L. Crisp. Forest Botanist Coconino NF Botany Specialist Report Coconino NF 12/9/2013 5:05 PM The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities. i Botany Specialist Report Coconino NF 12/9/2013 5:05 PM Preface The information in this specialist report reflects analysis that was completed prior to and in conjunction with the completion of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the revision of the 1987 Coconino National Forest Land Management Plan (the Plan). The primary purpose of specialist reports associated with the DEIS is to provide detailed information to assist in the preparation of the DEIS. As the DEIS was prepared, review-driven edits to the broader DEIS resulted in modifications to some of the information contained in some of the specialist reports. As a result, some reports no longer contain information and analysis that was updated through an interdisciplinary review process and is included in the DEIS in its entirety.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequence of Asparagus (Asparagus Officinalis L.) and Its Phy- Logenetic Positon Within Asparagales
    Central International Journal of Plant Biology & Research Bringing Excellence in Open Access Research Note *Corresponding author Wentao Sheng, Department of Biological Technology, Nanchang Normal University, Nanchang 330032, The Complete Chloroplast Jiangxi, China, Tel: 86-0791-87619332; Fax: 86-0791- 87619332; Email: Submitted: 14 September 2017 Genome Sequence of Accepted: 09 October 2017 Published: 10 October 2017 Asparagus (Asparagus ISSN: 2333-6668 Copyright © 2017 Sheng et al. officinalis L.) and its OPEN ACCESS Keywords Phylogenetic Positon within • Asparagus officinalis L • Chloroplast genome • Phylogenomic evolution Asparagales • Asparagales Wentao Sheng*, Xuewen Chai, Yousheng Rao, Xutang, Tu, and Shangguang Du Department of Biological Technology, Nanchang Normal University, China Abstract Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) is a horticultural homology of medicine and food with health care. The entire chloroplast (cp) genome of asparagus was sequenced with Hiseq4000 platform. The complete cp genome maps a circular molecule of 156,699bp built with a quadripartite organization: two inverted repeats (IRs) of 26,531bp, separated by a large single copy (LSC) sequence of 84,999bp and a small single copy (SSC) sequence of 18,638bp. A total of 112 genes comprising of 78 protein-coding genes, 30 tRNAs and 4 rRNAs were successfully annotated, 17 of which included introns. The identity, number and GC content of asparagus cp genes were similar to those of other asparagus species genomes. Analysis revealed 81 simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci, most composed of A or T, contributing to a bias in base composition. A maximum likelihood phylogenomic evolution analysis showed that asparagus was closely related to Polygonatum cyrtonema that belonged to the genus Asparagales.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Rare Plant Advisory Group Sensitive Plant List -June 2014
    ARIZONA RARE PLANT ADVISORY GROUP SENSITIVE PLANT LIST -JUNE 2014 •.. -e 'I"': ~ ~ •.. ·s o 0 .g o rn u rn '•".. ..>: ::s ~ ~ ~ 0"' tU I': ~ ~ Z ..•.. ~ '" u ::... 0 ~ E 0 u -; •.. is '5 rn 0 0 ~ ;::l ~ "g u d iL< ..>: ~ 0 •.. ~ s •.... "B .. § 0 ; 0 ~ ~ U ~ il< < ~ E-< ~ VERY HIGH CONCERN Agave delamateri Hodgs. & Slauson Asparagaceae w.e L Tonto Basin Agave 7 7 7 c Asparagaceae Agave phillipsiana w.e Hodgs wand Canvon Centurv Plant 7 7 7 nc Aotragalus crt!mnophylax uar: crt!mnophylax Bameby Fabaceae Sentrv Milk-vetch 7 8 7.5 c AOfragalus holmgreniomm Bameby Fabaceae Holmgren (Paradox) Milk-vetch 7 7 7 c Orobanchaceae Castilleja mogollonica PeJ2lJell Mogollon Paintbrush 7 8 7.5 Lv c Apiaceae Eryngium sparganophyllum HemsL Ribbonleaf Button Snakeroot 6 8 7 v? nc Lotus meamsii var. equisolensis].L Anderson Fabaccae Horseshoe Deer Vetch 6 8 7 nc Cactaceae Pediacactus brat!Ji L Benson Brady Pincushion Cactus 7 7 7 c Boraginaceae Phacelia cronquistiana S.L Wel,.h Cronquist's Phacelia 7 8 7.5 nc PotClltil1a arizona Greene Rosaceae Arizone Cinquefoil 6 8 7 nc Sphaeralcea gierischii N.D. Atwood & S.L Welsh Malvaceae Gierisch globemallow 7 7 7 nc HIGH CONCERN Ranunculaceae Actaea arizonica (S. Watson) J. Compton Arizona Buzbane 6 6 6 c Agave murpheyi F. Gibson Asparagaeeae Hohokam Agave 6 6 6 c Asnaragaceae Agave yavapaiensis Yavapai Agave 6 7 6.5 ne Aletes macdougalli ssp. macdougaftiJM. Coulto & Rose Apiaceae MacDougal's Indian parsley 6 6 6 nc Alide/la cliffordii J.M. Potter Polernoniaceae Clifford's Gilia 5 7 6 nc Antic/ea vaginata Rydb.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sacred and the Scientific the Botany of Northern Arizona
    The Sacred and the Beautiful Portraits of Just a Few Northern Arizonan Plants Andrea Hazelton Springs Stewardship Institute Museum of Northern Arizona Arizona Native Plant Society Annual Meeting 6 October 2020 Please allow me to introduce myself… Verde River, 2008 Rosilda Spring, Kaibab NF, 2020 Tsegi Canyon, 2010 Gray Mountain, 2014 Grand Canyon, 2018 The Sacred and the Beautiful The Sacred and the Beautiful… Sacred… 2a Worthy of religions veneration: Holy 2b Entitled to reverence or respect 3b Highly valued and important 1 Spirituality… The search for meaning in life… consideration of one’s relationship with self, others, nature, and whatever else one considers to be ultimate 2 1 Merriam-Webster Dictionary 2 Paraphrased from Wikipedia page on secular spirituality Monument Valley More sand than you can shake your fist at Kaibab Plateau Echo Cliffs Black Mesa Chuska Mtns Grand Canyon Hot Stinking Desert San Fran Peaks Dilkon Buttes Hualapai Mtns Petrified Forest Verde Valley Flagstaff: Rocky Mountain Bee Plant Photo by T. Liggett, Williams-Grand Canyon News Rocky Mountain Bee Plant • Peritoma serrulata, syn. Cleome serrulata • Navajo: Waa’ • Cleomaceae- Related to mustard and caper families. Photo by Patrick Alexander Photo by Tony Frates Photo by Max Licher Photo by Frankie Coburn Up in the Peaks: San Francisco Peaks Groundsel Photo by Max Licher This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA-NC San Francisco Peaks Groundsel • Packera franciscana • Asteraceae, the sunflower family Photo by Max Licher • Protected by Endangered Species Act (Listed Threatened) • Lives on volcanic talus above timberline • Off-trail hiking & camping PROHIBITED over 11,400 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Free PDF Download
    ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST CONTINUE ON TO THE NEXT PAGE FOR YOUR magazineFREE PDF (formerly the Center for Desert Archaeology) is a private 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization that explores and protects the places of our past across the American Southwest and Mexican Northwest. We have developed an integrated, conservation- based approach known as Preservation Archaeology. Although Preservation Archaeology begins with the active protection of archaeological sites, it doesn’t end there. We utilize holistic, low-impact investigation methods in order to pursue big-picture questions about what life was like long ago. As a part of our mission to help foster advocacy and appreciation for the special places of our past, we share our discoveries with the public. This free back issue of Archaeology Southwest Magazine is one of many ways we connect people with the Southwest’s rich past. Enjoy! Not yet a member? Join today! Membership to Archaeology Southwest includes: » A Subscription to our esteemed, quarterly Archaeology Southwest Magazine » Updates from This Month at Archaeology Southwest, our monthly e-newsletter » 25% off purchases of in-print, in-stock publications through our bookstore » Discounted registration fees for Hands-On Archaeology classes and workshops » Free pdf downloads of Archaeology Southwest Magazine, including our current and most recent issues » Access to our on-site research library » Invitations to our annual members’ meeting, as well as other special events and lectures Join us at archaeologysouthwest.org/how-to-help In the meantime, stay informed at our regularly updated Facebook page! 300 N Ash Alley, Tucson AZ, 85701 • (520) 882-6946 • [email protected] • www.archaeologysouthwest.org ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST SPRING 2014 A QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF ARCHAEOLOGYmagazine SOUTHWEST VOLUME 28 | NUMBER 2 A Good Place to Live for more than 12,000 Years Archaeology in Arizona's Verde Valley 3 A Good Place to Live for More Than 12,000 Years: Archaeology ISSUE EDITOR: in Arizona’s Verde Valley, Todd W.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Gap Ranch Biological Resource Evaluation
    RED GAP RANCH BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE EVALUATION Prepared for: Southwest Ground-water Consultants, Inc. Prepared by: WestLand Resources, Inc. Date: February 14, 2014 Project No.: 1822.01 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................ 1 2. EXISTING ENVIRONMENT AND BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ................................................... 2 2.1. Approach ...................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2. Physical Environment ................................................................................................................... 2 2.3. Biological Environment and Resources ....................................................................................... 3 3. SCREENING ANALYSIS FOR SPECIES OF CONCERN ................................................................ 5 3.1. Approach ...................................................................................................................................... 5 3.2. Screening Analysis Results .......................................................................................................... 7 3.2.1. USFWS-listed Species ...................................................................................................... 7 3.2.2. USFS Coconino National Forest Sensitive Species ........................................................ 15 3.2.3. USFS Management Indicator Species ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Explorations in Ethnobiology: the Legacy of Amadeo Rea
    Explorations in Ethnobiology: The Legacy of Amadeo Rea Edited by Marsha Quinlan and Dana Lepofsky Explorations in Ethnobiology: The Legacy of Amadeo Rea Edited by Marsha Quinlan and Dana Lepofsky Copyright 2013 ISBN-10: 0988733013 ISBN-13: 978-0-9887330-1-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2012956081 Society of Ethnobiology Department of Geography University of North Texas 1155 Union Circle #305279 Denton, TX 76203-5017 Cover photo: Amadeo Rea discussing bird taxonomy with Mountain Pima Griselda Coronado Galaviz of El Encinal, Sonora, Mexico, July 2001. Photograph by Dr. Robert L. Nagell, used with permission. Contents Preface to Explorations in Ethnobiology: The Legacy of Amadeo Rea . i Dana Lepofsky and Marsha Quinlan 1 . Diversity and its Destruction: Comments on the Chapters . .1 Amadeo M. Rea 2 . Amadeo M . Rea and Ethnobiology in Arizona: Biography of Influences and Early Contributions of a Pioneering Ethnobiologist . .11 R. Roy Johnson and Kenneth J. Kingsley 3 . Ten Principles of Ethnobiology: An Interview with Amadeo Rea . .44 Dana Lepofsky and Kevin Feeney 4 . What Shapes Cognition? Traditional Sciences and Modern International Science . .60 E.N. Anderson 5 . Pre-Columbian Agaves: Living Plants Linking an Ancient Past in Arizona . .101 Wendy C. Hodgson 6 . The Paleobiolinguistics of Domesticated Squash (Cucurbita spp .) . .132 Cecil H. Brown, Eike Luedeling, Søren Wichmann, and Patience Epps 7 . The Wild, the Domesticated, and the Coyote-Tainted: The Trickster and the Tricked in Hunter-Gatherer versus Farmer Folklore . .162 Gary Paul Nabhan 8 . “Dog” as Life-Form . .178 Eugene S. Hunn 9 . The Kasaga’yu: An Ethno-Ornithology of the Cattail-Eater Northern Paiute People of Western Nevada .
    [Show full text]
  • Some Agave Plants Grow Well in Our Area
    Some agave plants grow well in our area evaporation of excess moisture. For agave plants sensitive to cold, planting in pots oers the exibility of bringing them indoors during the Carol Dalu winter months. As with Master Gardener many plants, fall and spring are good times for uestion: In re- planting agave. cent travels to Although most prefer the southwest I drier Mediterranean Q came across an climates, there are quite interesting plant called a few that are cold hardy agave. I would like to and will grow in the Pa- know more about this cic Northwest. Here is plant and if it will grow just a sampling: in our area. ■ Agave havardiana Answer: The interest- (Harvard Agave), sil- ing, eye-catching agave ver-gray leaves plant is native to the ■ Agave Montana southern United States, (Mountain Agave), ap- Mexico, the Caribbe- ple-green leaves with red an and northern South teeth America. It is valued for ■ Agave ovatifolia its very striking ap- (Whale’s Tongue Agave), pearance, how easy it PIXABAY PHOTOS gray to powdery blue is to grow and for being Agave victoriae-reginea (Queen Victoria Century Plant) is a smaller variety of agave plant that is well-suited to a Pacific leaves lined with small drought tolerant. Northwest climate. However, it may need protection on the coldest days. teeth Although it looks very ■ Agave parryi much like a cactus, it is a great option. They (Artichoke Agave), is actually a perennial prefer rocky or sandy silvery-blue to sil- succulent. Agave is in soil but will tolerate any very-green leaves with the Agavacea family of well-draining soil, and dark spines evergreen succulents, they are not particular ■ Agave victoriae-re- which also includes dra- about the soil pH.
    [Show full text]
  • CRASSULACEAE the Most Efficient Method of Multiplication by Suc
    206 Bothalia 37,2 (2007) Otherwise dioecious Didiereaceae s.str. (Applequist & CURTIS, B.A. & MANNHEIMER, C.A. 2005. Tree atlas o f Namibia. Wallace 2000; Schatz 2001). The presence of gynodio- National Botanical Research Institute, Windhoek. ecy in Decaryia might be a plesiomorphy, an interpreta­ DYER. R.A. 1975. The genera of southern African flowering plants, vol. 1: dicotyledons. Department of Agricultural Technical Servi­ tion supported by its presence in the even more distantly ces, Pretoria. related genus Ceraria. This argument presupposes rever­ EGGLI, U. (ed.). 2002. Illustrated handbook of succulent plants: dicoty­ sion to hermaphrodite flowers in Calyptrotheca. It also ledons. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. provides support for the suggested placement of Ceraria EXELL, A.W. & MENDONCA, F.A. 1938-1939 [published 1939]. in an expanded Didiereaceae. Contribui^Ses para o conhecimento da flora de Africa. Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana 13: 309, 310. GERMISHUIZEN, G. & MEYER, N.L. (eds). 2003. Plants of southern Africa; an annotated checklist. Strelitzia 14. National Botanical ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Institute, Pretoria. HERSHKQVITZ, M.A. 1993. Revised circumscriptions and subgeneric I would like to thank Prof A.E. van Wyk, University taxonomies of Calandrinia and Montiopsis (Portulacaceae) with of Pretoria, for advice and support. Prof T.V. Jacobs, notes on phylogeny of the portulacaceous alliance. Annals o f the UNISA, for translating the diagnosis into Latin, Ms Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 333-365. Hester Steyn, SANBI, for preparing the distribution HERSHKOVITZ, M.A. & ZIMMER. E.A. 1997. On the evolutionary origins of the cacti. Taxon 46: 217-232. map and Ms Julia Kreiss for the line drawings. The JORDAAN, M.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 MSU Horticulture Gardens Houseplant and Succulent Sale - Tentative Inventory
    2020 MSU Horticulture Gardens Houseplant and Succulent Sale - Tentative Inventory Scroll Down for Cacti and Foliage Plants All Prices- To Be Determined Item Code Quantity Pot Size Genus species Common Name Family Light Water Category SUCCULENTS SUCCULENTS SUCCULENTS SUCCULENTS SUCCULENTS SUCCULENTS SUCCULENTS SUCCULENTS SUCCULENTS SUCCULENTS SUCCULENTS SUCCULENTS ADRO001 4" to 4.5" Adromischus cristatus 'Key Lime Pie' Crinkle-leaf Plant Crassulaceae High Low Succulent AEON001 15 4" Aeonium arborescens ' Tip Top' Dwarf Tree Aeonium Crassulaceae High Low Succulent AEON002 10 4" Aeonium atropurpureum Purple Aeonium Crassulaceae High Low Succulent AEON003 4" Aeonium castello-paivae variegata 'Suncup' Suncup Aeonium Crassulaceae High Low Succulent AEON004 30 4" Aeonium haworthii 'Kiwi' Haworth's Aeonium Crassulaceae High Low Succulent AEON005 15 4" Aeonium hybrid 'Stripe' Stripe Aeonium Crassulaceae High Low Succulent AGAV001 3 4" Agave geminiflora Twin flowered Agave Agavoideae High Low Succulent AGAV002 43 4.5" Agave gypsophyla 'Ivory Curls' Ivory Curls Century Plant Agavoideae High Low Succulent AGAV003 39 3.5" to 4" Agave victoriae-reginae 'Porcupine' Queen Victoria Agave Agavoideae High Low Succulent AGAV004 64 4.5" Agave xylonacantha 'Frostbite' Frostbite Century Plant Agavoideae High Low Succulent ALBU001 14 6" Albuca bracteata Pregnant Onion Asparagaceae High Low Succulent ALBU002 36 4" Albuca bracteata Pregnant Onion Asparagaceae High Low Succulent ALOE001 33 4" Aloe aristata Lace Aloe Asphodelaceae High Low Succulent ALOE002 26 4" Aloe ciliaris Climbing Aloe Asphodelaceae High Low Succulent ALOE003 20 4" Aloe hybrid 'Minnie Belle' Hybrid Aloe Asphodelaceae High Low Succulent ALOE004 37 4" Aloe hybrid 'Pink Blush' Pink Blush Aloe Asphodelaceae High Low Succulent ALOE005 3 6" Aloe hybrid 'T.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecophysiology of Crassulacean Acid Metabolism (CAM)
    Annals of Botany 93: 629±652, 2004 doi:10.1093/aob/mch087, available online at www.aob.oupjournals.org INVITED REVIEW Ecophysiology of Crassulacean Acid Metabolism (CAM) ULRICH LUÈ TTGE* Institute of Botany, Technical University of Darmstadt, Schnittspahnstrasse 3±5, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany Received: 3 October 2003 Returned for revision: 17 December 2003 Accepted: 20 January 2004 d Background and Scope Crassulacean Acid Metabolism (CAM) as an ecophysiological modi®cation of photo- synthetic carbon acquisition has been reviewed extensively before. Cell biology, enzymology and the ¯ow of carbon along various pathways and through various cellular compartments have been well documented and dis- cussed. The present attempt at reviewing CAM once again tries to use a different approach, considering a wide range of inputs, receivers and outputs. d Input Input is given by a network of environmental parameters. Six major ones, CO2,H2O, light, temperature, nutrients and salinity, are considered in detail, which allows discussion of the effects of these factors, and combinations thereof, at the individual plant level (`physiological aut-ecology'). d Receivers Receivers of the environmental cues are the plant types genotypes and phenotypes, the latter includ- ing morphotypes and physiotypes. CAM genotypes largely remain `black boxes', and research endeavours of genomics, producing mutants and following molecular phylogeny, are just beginning. There is no special development of CAM morphotypes except for a strong tendency for leaf or stem succulence with large cells with big vacuoles and often, but not always, special water storage tissues. Various CAM physiotypes with differing degrees of CAM expression are well characterized. d Output Output is the shaping of habitats, ecosystems and communities by CAM.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 IOS Bull 16(1)
    ISSN 0141-2787 International Organization for Succulent Plant Study Organización Internacional para el Estudio de Plantas Suculentas Organisation Internationale de Recherche sur les Plantes Succulentes Internationale Organisation für Sukkulenten-Forschung IOS BULLETIN Volume 16(1) July 2014 IOS Bulletin Volume 16(1) July 2014 Contents Message from the President ........................................................................................................3 33rd IOS Congress, Desert Botanical Garden, Phoenix, Arizona 8–12 April 2014 Programme ............................................................................................................................4 Impressions of the Congress ..................................................................................................8 Abstracts and Summaries of Congress Presentations ............................................................9 Poster presentations .............................................................................................................19 Report of Members’ General Meeting .................................................................................23 Post-Congress announcements ..................................................................................................27 Review of current projects associated with IOS .......................................................................29 Conservation Meetings in Mexico, May 2014 Sara Oldfield ..................................................30 IOS Meetings: Some comments
    [Show full text]