DOCSLIB.ORG

(19) 11 Patent Number: 5668117

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(19) 11 Patent Number: 5668117 US005668117A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,668,117 Shapiro 45 Date of Patent: Sep. 16, 1997 54 METHODS OF TREATING NEUROLOGICAL 4,673,669 6/1987 Yoshikumi et al. ...................... 514.f42 DSEASES AND ETOLOGICALLY RELATED 4,757,054 7/1988 Yoshikumi et al. ... 514742 SYMPTOMOLOGY USING CARBONYL 4,771,075 9/1988 Cavazza ............... ... 514/556 TRAPPNGAGENTS IN COMBINATION 4,801,581 1/1989 Yoshikumi et al. ...................... 514.f42 WITH PREVIOUSLY KNOWN 4,874,750 10/1989 Yoshikumi et al. ...................... 514/42 MEDICAMENTS 4,956,391 9/1990 Sapse .................. 514,810 4,957,906 9/1990 Yoshikumi et al. ...................... 514/25 tor: H . Shani 4,983,586 1/1991 Bodor....................................... 514/58 76 Inventor ES pr.) Price Ave 5,015,570 5/1991 Scangos et al. ............................ 435/6 5,037,851 8/1991 Cavazza ........... ... 514,912 5,252,489 10/1993 Macri ........................................ 436/87 21 Appl. No.: 62,201 5297,562 3/1994 Potter. ... 128/898 al 5,324,667 6/1994 Macri. ... 436/87 22 Filed: Jun. 29, 1993 5,324,668 6/1994 Macri ....................................... 436/87 Related U.S. Application Data I63 Continuation-in-part of set No. 26.617, Feb. 23, 1993, Primary Eminer ohn Kight abandoned, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 660.561, Assistant Examiner-Louise Leary Feb. 22, 1991, abandoned. Attorney, Agent, or Firm-D. J. Perrella (51) Int. Cl. ................... A01N 43/04; A01N 61/00; 57 ABSTRACT C07H1/00; C08B 37/08 52 U.S. C. ................................ 514/55; 514/54; 514/23; Therapeutic compositions comprising an effective amount 514/1: 514/811; 514/866; 514/878; 514/879; of at least one carbonyl trapping agent alone or in combi 514/903; 514/912; 436/518; 436/74; 536/1.11; nation with a therapeutically effective of a co-agent or 536/20 medicament are disclosed. The compositions are used to 58) Field of Search ................................. 514/55, 54, 23, treat a mammal suffering from a neurological disease char 514/1, 811, 866, 878, 879,903, 912; 435/6. acterized by covalent bond crosslinking between the nerve 7.9; 436/518, 74, 87; 536/1.11, 20 cells, other cellular structures and their intracellular and extracellular components, with disease induced carbonyl 56) References Cited containing aliphatic or aromatic hydrocarbons present in mammals. U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 4,665,069 5/1987 Rosenberg .............................. 514/817 29 Claims, No Drawings 5,668, 117 1. 2 METHODS OF TREATING NEUROLOGICAL The 16th edition of the Merck Manual (Berkow, 1992, pp. DSEASES AND ETOLOGICALLY RELATED 1497-1499) has defined symptomatic clinical treatment of SYMPTOMOLOGY USING CARBONYL Parkinson's disease to consist of: (a) oral co-administration TRAPPINGAGENTS IN COMBINATION of levodopa, the metabolic precursor of dopamine, and WITH PREVIOUSLY KNOWN carbidopa, a peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor in compo MEDCAMENTS sitions such as Sinemet CR; (b) co-agent use of amantadine HCl Symmetrel; 1-amino-adamantane, a rye ergot alkaloid RELATED PATENTAPPLICATION and neuronal transmission enhancer; (c) co-agent use of This invention is a continuation in part of U.S. patent ergot alkaloids such as bromocriptine mesylate Parlodel, application Ser. No. 08/026,617, filed on Feb. 23, 1993, now 10 which has a dopamine agonist activity for D receptors and abandoned, entitled “Method of Treating Neurological Dis antagonist activity at D receptors) and pergolide mesylate eases and Etiologically Related Symptomology Using Car Permax, a dopamine-receptor agonist active at both D and bonyl Trapping Agents,” which in turn is a continuation of D receptor subtypes (Robin, 1991); (d) selegiline HCI U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/660,561, filed on Feb. Eldepryl, a selective inhibitor of monoamine oxidase B 22, 1991 entitled "Method of Treating Neurological Dis 15 which prolongs the action of dopamine (Rinne, 1991); (e) eases and Etiologically Related Symptomology Using Car co-agent use of anticholinergic medications such as benz bonyl Trapping Agents.” now abandoned, the entire disclo tropine mesylate Cogentin, trihexylphenidyl Artanel, pro sures of which are incorporated by reference herein. cyclidine Kemadrin, biperiden and ethopropazine Paridol; (f) co-agent use of antihistamines such as diphen BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION hydramine Benadryland orphenadrine; (g) co-agent use of 1. Field of the Invention tricyclic antidepressants such as amitriptyline, imipramine, This invention relates to the clinical treatment of neuro nortriptyline and doxepin; and (h) co-agent use of propra degenerative diseases, including hereditary motor and sen nolol. sory neuropathies (HMSN, also known as Charcot-Marie Other well established or experimental therapeutic Tooth disease), diabetic polyneuropathy, Alzheimer's pre 25 approaches for clinical treatment of Parkinson's disease, senile and senile dementia, Down's syndrome, Parkinson's which may or may not be used in conjunction with L-dopa, disease, olivopontocerebellaratrophy, Huntington's disease, have been publicly disclosed. These include possible use of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, age-onset neurological (a) selegiline in combination with tocopherol (Greenamyre deterioration, alcoholic polyneuropathy, tinnitus, multiple and O'Brien, 1991); (b) D-cycloserine with or without a sclerosis, and pathophysiologically symptomology. 30 cholinesterase inhibitor co-agent (Francis and coworkers, 2. Description of Prior Art 1991); (c) other dopamine receptor agonists such as (+)-4- The logic and potential value, even synergistic value, of propyl-9-hydroxynaphthoxazine (Martin and coworkers, using two or more therapeutic agents in combination has 1984), apomorphine and ciladopa (Koller and coworkers, been recognized previously (Ghose and coworkers, 1983; 1986; Goldstein and coworkers, 1990); (d) neurotransmis Goldstein and coworkers, 1990, pg. 102; Rinne, 1991). For 35 sion enhancer drugs such as lisuride, a rye ergot alkaloid example, in a study on two-drug combinations of memory (Rinne, 1989; Rinne, 1991); (e) known antioxidants such as enhancing agents Flood and coworkers (1988) noted that: ascorbic acid, alpha-tocopherol, beta-carotene (Mathews The potential for clinically desirable drug interactions has Roth, 1987), N-acetylcysteine (Smilkstein and coworkers, been emphasized for drugs in general (1) and for 1988), penicillamine or cysteamine (Harris, 1982), as memory enhancing drugs in particular (2.3). For increased levels of lipid peroxidation are apparent in par example, individual cholinergic drugs which improve kinsonian tissue (Ceballos and coworkers, 1990; Fahn, memory retention test scores (4.56) do so in two-drug 1989); (f) other peripheral decarboxylase inhibitors such as combinations at substantially lower doses than would benserazide (Madopar HBS) (Pinder and coworkers, 1978; be predicted if the two drugs acted additively (7,8,9). Pletscher, 1990); and (g) N-methyl-D-asparate (NMDA) 45 glutamate receptor antagonists such as dizocilpine In prior studies of the effect of two-drug combinations on (Clineschmidt and coworkers, 1982; Woodruff and memory processing (8,9), we determined the effect of coworkers, 1987) and millacemide (Youdim, 1988; Ferris, varying the dose of two drugs while holding the ratio 1990) or use of the possible antagonist 1-amino-3,5- constant. The ratio was based on the optimal memory dimethyl adamantane (Memantine) (Fischer and coworkers, enhancing doses of each drug administered singly. 50 1977; Schmidt and coworkers, 1990; Greenamyre and These studies showed that drugs administered in certain O'Brien, 1991); (h) tacrine (Cognex, an experimental agent combinations require 67 to 96% less drug to improve of Warner-Lambert Co.) and a hydroxy derivative thereof, retention, than when the same drugs were administered (E)-9-amino-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroacridin-1-ol (Shutske and alone. This type of drug interaction was said to yield coworkers, 1988); and (i) tiapride (Price and coworkers, Supra-additivity. 55 1978). The present disclosure describes the inventive concept of Since activation of NMDA glutamate receptors has also using the therapeutic technology of U.S. patent application been implicated in the etiologies of Huntington's disease, Ser. No. 08/026,617, filed Feb. 23, 1993, now abandoned in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, olivopontocerebellar atrophy combination witch pharmaceutical agents previously recog and Alzheimer's disease, use of NMDA glutamate receptor nized as having, or possibly having some medicinal value antagonists such as those listed above may be of clinical for treatment of the disease entities noted above. No phar benefit for patients having these diseases (Woodruff and macological treatment of comprehensive effectiveness is coworkers, 1987; Greenamyre and O'Brien, 1991; Giuffra currently available for any of the neurological disorders and coworkers, 1992), as well as for patients suffering from discussed herein. However, a variety of pharmaceutical certain neurodegenerative effects of aging (Ferris, 1990). agents have been described which may offer at least some 65 Drugs which may enhance acetylcholine synthesis or release degree of symptomatic relief from the clinical effects of such as phosphatidylcholine, 3,4-diaminopyridine (Ferris, these diseases. 1990; Harvey and Rowan, 1990) and choline (Sitaram and 5,668,117 3 4 coworkers, 1978a), as well as the muscarinic cholinergic etam (Franklin and coworkers, 1986), pyroglutamic acid agonist arecoline (Tariot and coworkers, 1988), have
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Novel Neuroprotective Compunds for Use in Parkinson's Disease
    Novel neuroprotective compounds for use in Parkinson’s disease A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science By Ahmed Shubbar December, 2013 Thesis written by Ahmed Shubbar B.S., University of Kufa, 2009 M.S., Kent State University, 2013 Approved by ______________________Werner Geldenhuys ____, Chair, Master’s Thesis Committee __________________________,Altaf Darvesh Member, Master’s Thesis Committee __________________________,Richard Carroll Member, Master’s Thesis Committee ___Eric_______________________ Mintz , Director, School of Biomedical Sciences ___Janis_______________________ Crowther , Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii Table of Contents List of figures…………………………………………………………………………………..v List of tables……………………………………………………………………………………vi Acknowledgments.…………………………………………………………………………….vii Chapter 1: Introduction ..................................................................................... 1 1.1 Parkinson’s disease .............................................................................................. 1 1.2 Monoamine Oxidases ........................................................................................... 3 1.3 Monoamine Oxidase-B structure ........................................................................... 8 1.4 Structural differences between MAO-B and MAO-A .............................................13 1.5 Mechanism of oxidative deamination catalyzed by Monoamine Oxidases ............15 1 .6 Neuroprotective effects
    [Show full text]
  • Acetylcholinesterase and Monoamine Oxidase-B Inhibitory Activities By
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Acetylcholinesterase and monoamine oxidase‑B inhibitory activities by ellagic acid derivatives isolated from Castanopsis cuspidata var. sieboldii Jong Min Oh1, Hyun‑Jae Jang2, Myung‑Gyun Kang3, Soobin Song2, Doo‑Young Kim2, Jung‑Hee Kim2, Ji‑In Noh1, Jong Eun Park1, Daeui Park3, Sung‑Tae Yee1 & Hoon Kim1* Among 276 herbal extracts, a methanol extract of Castanopsis cuspidata var. sieboldii stems was selected as an experimental source for novel acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors. Five compounds were isolated from the extract by activity‑guided screening, and their inhibitory activities against butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), monoamine oxidases (MAOs), and β‑site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE‑1) were also evaluated. Of these compounds, 4′‑O‑(α‑l‑rhamnopyranosyl)‑ 3,3′,4‑tri‑O‑methylellagic acid (3) and 3,3′,4‑tri‑O‑methylellagic acid (4) efectively inhibited AChE with IC50 values of 10.1 and 10.7 µM, respectively. Ellagic acid (5) inhibited AChE (IC50 = 41.7 µM) less than 3 and 4. In addition, 3 efectively inhibited MAO‑B (IC50 = 7.27 µM) followed by 5 (IC50 = 9.21 µM). All fve compounds weakly inhibited BChE and BACE‑1. Compounds 3, 4, and 5 reversibly and competitively inhibited AChE, and were slightly or non‑toxic to MDCK cells. The binding energies of 3 and 4 (− 8.5 and − 9.2 kcal/mol, respectively) for AChE were greater than that of 5 (− 8.3 kcal/mol), and 3 and 4 formed a hydrogen bond with Tyr124 in AChE. These results suggest 3 is a dual‑targeting inhibitor of AChE and MAO‑B, and that these compounds should be viewed as potential therapeutics for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Acetylcholine Signaling System in Progression of Lung Cancers
    Pharmacology & Therapeutics 194 (2019) 222–254 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Pharmacology & Therapeutics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pharmthera Acetylcholine signaling system in progression of lung cancers Jamie R. Friedman a,1, Stephen D. Richbart a,1,JustinC.Merritta,KathleenC.Browna, Nicholas A. Nolan a, Austin T. Akers a, Jamie K. Lau b, Zachary R. Robateau a, Sarah L. Miles a,PiyaliDasguptaa,⁎ a Department of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, 1700 Third Avenue, Huntington, WV 25755 b Biology Department, Center for the Sciences, Box 6931, Radford University, Radford, Virginia 24142 article info abstract Available online 3 October 2018 The neurotransmitter acetylcholine (ACh) acts as an autocrine growth factor for human lung cancer. Several lines of evidence show that lung cancer cells express all of the proteins required for the uptake of choline (choline Keywords: transporter 1, choline transporter-like proteins) synthesis of ACh (choline acetyltransferase, carnitine acetyl- Lung cancer transferase), transport of ACh (vesicular acetylcholine transport, OCTs, OCTNs) and degradation of ACh (acetyl- Acetylcholine cholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase). The released ACh binds back to nicotinic (nAChRs) and muscarinic Cholinergic receptors on lung cancer cells to accelerate their proliferation, migration and invasion. Out of all components Proliferation of the cholinergic pathway, the nAChR-signaling has been studied the most intensely. The reason for this trend Invasion Anti-cancer drugs is due to genome-wide data studies showing that nicotinic receptor subtypes are involved in lung cancer risk, the relationship between cigarette smoke and lung cancer risk as well as the rising popularity of electronic ciga- rettes considered by many as a “safe” alternative to smoking.
    [Show full text]
  • Imaging Functional Brain Connectivity
    Imaging Functional Brain Connectivity: pharmacological modulation, aging & Alzheimer’s disease Bernadet L. Klaassens 1 Table of contents Chapter 1 3 Introduction and aims Part I: Pharmacological challenge effects on brain connectivity in healthy young adults Chapter 2 10 Single-dose serotonergic stimulation shows widespread effects on functional brain connectivity (NeuroImage 2015 Nov; 122: 440-450) Chapter 3 31 Time related effects on functional brain connectivity after serotonergic and cholinergic neuromodulation (Human Brain Mapping 2017 Jan; 38 (1): 308-325) Part II: Functional brain connectivity and neuromodulation in older age and Alzheimer’s disease Chapter 4 60 Diminished posterior precuneus connectivity with the default mode network differentiates normal aging from Alzheimer’s disease (Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 2017 Apr; 9: 1-13) Chapter 5 84 Serotonergic and cholinergic modulation of functional brain connectivity: a comparison between young and older adults ( NeuroImage 2018 Apr; 169: 312-322) Chapter 6 108 Imaging cholinergic and serotonergic neurotransmitter networks in Alzheimer’s disease in vivo (Submission at Alzheimer’s and Dementia) Chapter 7 131 Summary and general discussion 2 Chapter 1 Introduction and aims Brain function relies heavily on neural communication and connections. Better understanding of the mechanisms that are related to maintenance or deterioration of brain function requires a technique that takes into account the elaborate nature of the central nervous system (CNS). A useful method for that purpose is to assess the brain’s functional connectivity. Brain regions are functionally connected to each other when they exhibit correlating activation patterns (Friston et al., 1993), illustrating the complex organization of neural networks. Interactions between regions and within networks largely depend on chemical transmission between neurons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Oxime Reactivators on the Muscarinic Receptors
    Oxime reactivators and their in vivo and in vitro effects on nicotinic receptors Ondrej Soukup1,6, Jan Krusek4, Martina Kaniakova4, Uday Killi. Kumar3, Murat Oz5, Daniel Jun1,2, Josef Fusek1 and Kamil Kuca1,2 and Gunnar Tobin3 1Department of Toxicology and 2Center of Advanced Studies, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic 3Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Pharmacology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sweden 4Institute of Physiology Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic v.v.i., Prague, Czech Republic 5Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates 6University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic Corresponding author: Ondrej Soukup ****************************************** Department of Toxicology Faculty of Military Health Sciences University of Defence Trebesska 1575 50001; Hradec Kralove Czech Republic Tel.: +420 973 255 151 Fax: +420 495 518 094 E-mail: [email protected] Summary: Current treatment of organophosphorus poisoning, resulting in overstimulation and desensitization of muscarinic and nicotinic receptors by acetylcholine (ACh), consists of the administration of atropine and oxime reactivators. However, no versatile oxime reactivator has been developed yet and some mortality still remains after application of standard atropine treatment, probably due to its lack of antinicotinic action. In our study, we focused on the interesting non-acetylcholinesterase property of oximes, i.e. antinicotinic effect of reactivators. Two standard reactivators (HI-6, obidoxime) and two new compounds (K027 and K203) were chosen and in vitro (patch clamp) and in vivo (nerve-evoked muscle contraction) testings were applied. Both examinations showed antinicotinic effects of the reactivators.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug-Induced Movement Disorders
    Medical Management of Early PD Samer D. Tabbal, M.D. May 2016 Associate Professor of Neurology Director of The Parkinson Disease & Other Movement Disorders Program Mobile: +961 70 65 89 85 email: [email protected] Conflict of Interest Statement No drug company pays me any money Outline So, you diagnosed Parkinson disease .Natural history of the disease .When to start drug therapy? .Which drug to use first for symptomatic treatment? ● Levodopa vs dopamine agonist vs MAOI Natural History of Parkinson Disease Before levodopa: Death within 10 years After levodopa: . “Honeymoon” period (~ 5-7 years) . Motor (ON/OFF) fluctuations & dyskinesias: ● Drug therapy effective initially ● Surgical intervention by 10-15 years - Deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy Motor Response Dyskinesia 5-7 yrs >10 yrs Dyskinesia ON state ON state OFF state OFF state time time Several days Several hours 1-2 hour Natural History of Parkinson Disease Prominent gait impairment and autonomic symptoms by 20-25 years (Merola 2011) Behavioral changes before or with motor symptoms: . Sleep disorders . Depression . Anxiety . Hallucinations, paranoid delusions Dementia at anytime during the illness . When prominent or early: diffuse Lewy body disease Symptoms of Parkinson Disease Motor Symptoms Sensory Symptoms Mental Symptoms: . Cognitive and psychiatric Autonomic Symptoms Presenting Symptoms of Parkinson Disease Mood disorders: depression and lack of motivation Sleep disorders: “acting out dreams” and nightmares Early motor symptoms: Typically Unilateral . Rest tremor: chin, arms or legs or “inner tremor” . Bradykinesia: focal and generalized slowness . Rigidity: “muscle stiffness or ache” Also: (usually no early postural instability) . Facial masking with hypophonia: “does not smile anymore” or “looks unhappy all the time” .
    [Show full text]
  • PAPER Monoamine Oxidase Inhibition Is Unlikely to Be Relevant To
    International Journal of Obesity (2001) 25, 1454–1458 ß 2001 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0307–0565/01 $15.00 www.nature.com/ijo PAPER Monoamine oxidase inhibition is unlikely to be relevant to the risks associated with phentermine and fenfluramine: a comparison with their abilities to evoke monoamine release{ IC Kilpatrick1*, M Traut2 and DJ Heal1 1Knoll Limited Research and Development, Nottingham, UK; and 2Knoll GmbH, 50 Knollstrasse, D-67061, Ludwigshafen, Germany OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: It has been proposed that the anti-obesity agent, phentermine, may act in part via inhibition of monoamine oxidase (MAO). The ability of phentermine to inhibit both MAOA and MAOB in vitro has been examined along with that of the fenfluramine isomers, a range of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and sibutramine and its active metabolites. RESULTS: In rat brain, harmaline and lazabemide showed potent and selective inhibition of MAOA and MAOB, their respective target enzymes, with IC50 values of 2.3 and 18 nM. In contrast, all other drugs examined were only weak inhibitors of MAOA and MAOB with IC50 values for each enzyme in the moderate to high micromolar range. For MAOA, the IC50 for phentermine was estimated to be 143 mM, that for S( þ )-fenfluramine, 265 mM and that for sertraline, 31 mM. For MAOB, example IC50s were as follows: phentermine (285 mM), S( þ )-fenfluramine (800 mM) and paroxetine (16 mM). Sibutramine was unable to inhibit either enzyme, even at its limit of solubility. CONCLUSION: We therefore suggest that MAO inhibition is unlikely to play a role in the pharmacodynamic properties of any of the tested drugs, including phentermine.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 2:10-Cv-05078-CCC-MF Document 540 Filed 09/20/13 Page 1 of 59 Pageid: 14610
    Case 2:10-cv-05078-CCC-MF Document 540 Filed 09/20/13 Page 1 of 59 PageID: 14610 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY TEA NEUROSCIENCE, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC.. and TEVA PHARI’IACEUTICALS INDUSTRIES, LTD., Civil Action No. 2:lO-cv-05078 Plaintiffs, V. Opinion WATSON LABORATORIES, INC., MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., MYLAN INC., ORCHID CHEMICALS & PHARMACEUTICALS LTD., ORCHID HEALTHCARE (a division of Orchid Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Ltd.) and ORGENUS PHARMA INC. Defendants. TEVA NEUROSCIENCE, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS INDUSTRIES, LTD., Civil Action No. 2:1l-cv-3076 Plaintiffs, v. APOTEX CORP. and APOTEX INC. Defendants. Case 2:10-cv-05078-CCC-MF Document 540 Filed 09/20/13 Page 2 of 59 PageID: 14611 Claire C. Cecchi, U.S.D.J. This matter comes before the Court by complaint of Teva Neuroscience, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries, Ltd. (collectively, “Teva”) against Mylan’ and certain other defendants,2 This case concerns the validity of United States Patent No. 5,453,446 (“the ‘446 Patent”), which is directed to a method of treating Parkinson’s disease, This Court conducted a non-jury trial in this matter from May 15-31, 2013. This Opinion constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a). For the reasons stated herein, a finding in favor of Teva will be entered. BACKGROUND I. The Parties Plaintiff Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (“Teva Ltd.”) is an Israeli company with its principal place of business at 5 Basel Street, Petach Ti.Kva, 49131, Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Potent Inhibition of Monoamine Oxidase B by a Piloquinone from Marine-Derived Streptomyces Sp. CNQ-027
    J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. (2017), 27(4), 785–790 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1612.12025 Research Article Review jmb Potent Inhibition of Monoamine Oxidase B by a Piloquinone from Marine-Derived Streptomyces sp. CNQ-027 Hyun Woo Lee1, Hansol Choi2, Sang-Jip Nam2, William Fenical3, and Hoon Kim1* 1Department of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Life Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Republic of Korea 2Department of Chemistry and Nano Science, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea 3Center for Marine Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0204, USA Received: December 19, 2016 Revised: December 27, 2016 Two piloquinone derivatives isolated from Streptomyces sp. CNQ-027 were tested for the Accepted: January 4, 2017 inhibitory activities of two isoforms of monoamine oxidase (MAO), which catalyzes monoamine neurotransmitters. The piloquinone 4,7-dihydroxy-3-methyl-2-(4-methyl-1- oxopentyl)-6H-dibenzo[b,d]pyran-6-one (1) was found to be a highly potent inhibitor of First published online human MAO-B, with an IC50 value of 1.21 µM; in addition, it was found to be highly effective January 9, 2017 against MAO-A, with an IC50 value of 6.47 µM. Compound 1 was selective, but not extremely *Corresponding author so, for MAO-B compared with MAO-A, with a selectivity index value of 5.35. Compound 1,8- Phone: +82-61-750-3751; dihydroxy-2-methyl-3-(4-methyl-1-oxopentyl)-9,10-phenanthrenedione (2) was moderately Fax: +82-61-750-3708; effective for the inhibition of MAO-B (IC = 14.50 µM) but not for MAO-A (IC > 80 µM).
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceutical Appendix to the Tariff Schedule 2
    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2007) (Rev. 2) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2007) (Rev. 2) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. ABACAVIR 136470-78-5 ACIDUM LIDADRONICUM 63132-38-7 ABAFUNGIN 129639-79-8 ACIDUM SALCAPROZICUM 183990-46-7 ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACIDUM SALCLOBUZICUM 387825-03-8 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ACIFRAN 72420-38-3 ABAPERIDONUM 183849-43-6 ACIPIMOX 51037-30-0 ABARELIX 183552-38-7 ACITAZANOLAST 114607-46-4 ABATACEPTUM 332348-12-6 ACITEMATE 101197-99-3 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ACITRETIN 55079-83-9 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ACIVICIN 42228-92-2 ABETIMUSUM 167362-48-3 ACLANTATE 39633-62-0 ABIRATERONE 154229-19-3 ACLARUBICIN 57576-44-0 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ACLATONIUM NAPADISILATE 55077-30-0 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ACODAZOLE 79152-85-5 ABRINEURINUM 178535-93-8 ACOLBIFENUM 182167-02-8 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ACONIAZIDE 13410-86-1 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ACOTIAMIDUM 185106-16-5 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9
    [Show full text]
  • A Strategy for Developing New Treatment Paradigms for Neuropsychiatric and Neurocognitive Symptoms in Alzheimer’S Disease
    HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY ARTICLE published: 16 April 2013 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2013.00047 A strategy for developing new treatment paradigms for neuropsychiatric and neurocognitive symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease Hugo Geerts1,2*, Patrick Roberts1,3, Athan Spiros1 and Robert Carr1 1 In Silico Biosciences, Berwyn, PA, USA 2 Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA 3 Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA Edited by: Successful disease modifying drug development for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has hit a David Riddell, Pfizer, USA roadblock with the recent failures of amyloid-based therapies, highlighting the translational Reviewed by: disconnect between preclinical animal models and clinical outcome. Although disease Roland Seifert, Medical School of modifying therapies are the Holy Grail to pursue, symptomatic therapies addressing Hannover, Germany Filippo Caraci, University of Catania, cognitive and neuropsychiatric aspects of the disease are also extremely important for the Italy quality of life of patients and caregivers. Despite the fact that neuropsychiatric problems *Correspondence: in Alzheimer patients are the major driver for costs associated with institutionalization, no Hugo Geerts, In Silico Biosciences, good preclinical animal models with predictive validity have been documented. We propose 686 Westwind Drive, Berwyn, PA a combination of quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP), phenotypic screening and 19312, USA. e-mail: Hugo-Geerts@In-Silico- preclinical animal models as a novel strategy for addressing the bottleneck in both cognitive Biosciences.com and neuropsychiatric drug discovery and development for AD. Preclinical animal models such as transgene rats documenting changes in neurotransmitters with tau and amyloid pathology will provide key information that together with human imaging, pathology and clinical data will inform the virtual patient model.
    [Show full text]
  • Dementia Summary
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 97 Pharmacological Treatment of Dementia Summary Introduction 1. Does pharmacotherapy for dementia syndromes improve cognitive symptoms and The focus of this review is the pharmacological outcomes? treatment of dementia. Pharmacotherapy is often 2. Does pharmacotherapy delay cognitive the central intervention used to improve deterioration or delay disease onset of symptoms or delay the progression of dementia dementia syndromes? syndromes. The available agents vary with respect 3. Are certain drugs, including alternative to their therapeutic actions, and are supported by medicines (non-pharmaceutical), more varying levels of evidence for efficacy. This report effective than others? is a systematic evaluation of the evidence for 4. Do certain patient populations benefit more pharmacological interventions for the treatment from pharmacotherapy than others? of dementia in the domains of cognition, global 5. What is the evidence base for the treatment function, behavior/mood, quality of life/activities of ischemic vascular dementia (VaD)? of daily living (ADL) and caregiver burden. This review considers different types of Many medications have been studied in dementia populations (not just Alzheimer’s dementia patients. These agents can be classified Disease [AD]) in subjects from both community into three broad categories: and institutional settings. The studies eligible in 1. Cholinergic neurotransmitter modifying this systematic review were restricted to parallel agents, such as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. RCTs of high methodological quality. 2. Non-cholinergic neurotransmitters/ neuropeptide modifying agents. Methods 3. Other pharmacological agents. A team of content specialists was assembled Although only five agents have been approved from both international and local experts.
    [Show full text]