Novel Neuroprotective Compunds for Use in Parkinson's Disease

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Novel Neuroprotective Compunds for Use in Parkinson's Disease Novel neuroprotective compounds for use in Parkinson’s disease A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science By Ahmed Shubbar December, 2013 Thesis written by Ahmed Shubbar B.S., University of Kufa, 2009 M.S., Kent State University, 2013 Approved by ______________________Werner Geldenhuys ____, Chair, Master’s Thesis Committee __________________________,Altaf Darvesh Member, Master’s Thesis Committee __________________________,Richard Carroll Member, Master’s Thesis Committee ___Eric_______________________ Mintz , Director, School of Biomedical Sciences ___Janis_______________________ Crowther , Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii Table of Contents List of figures…………………………………………………………………………………..v List of tables……………………………………………………………………………………vi Acknowledgments.…………………………………………………………………………….vii Chapter 1: Introduction ..................................................................................... 1 1.1 Parkinson’s disease .............................................................................................. 1 1.2 Monoamine Oxidases ........................................................................................... 3 1.3 Monoamine Oxidase-B structure ........................................................................... 8 1.4 Structural differences between MAO-B and MAO-A .............................................13 1.5 Mechanism of oxidative deamination catalyzed by Monoamine Oxidases ............15 1 .6 Neuroprotective effects of Monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors ................................19 Chapter 2: Materials and Methods ..............................................................22 2.1 Monoamine Oxidase Inhibition assay ...................................................................26 2.2 Determination of Monoamine Oxidase-B binding reversibility ...............................28 2.3 Measuring the effects of test compounds on Km and Vmax of MAO-B .....................29 2.4 Oxygen radical absorbance capacity assay .........................................................30 2.5 Acetylcholinesterase Inhibition Assay ..................................................................31 2.6 Measuring IC50 of test compounds against acetylcholinesterase enzyme .............33 2.7 Bovine Serum Albumin Binding Assay .................................................................33 2.8 Parallel Artificial Membrane Permeability Assay ...................................................34 Curve fitting and graphs .............................................................................................36 Docking Studies .........................................................................................................37 iii Chapter 3: Results ..............................................................................................38 3.1 Monoamine Oxidase Inhibition assay ...................................................................38 3.2 Acetylcholinesterase Inhibition Assay ..................................................................44 3.3 Parallel Artificial Membrane Permeability Assay ...................................................46 3.4 Bovine Serum Albumin Binding Assay .................................................................48 3.5 Oxygen radical absorbance capacity assay .........................................................52 3.6 Effect of 5223890 and 7691778 on Km and Vmax of MAO-B ...................................54 3.7 Determination of Monoamine Oxidase-B binding reversibility ...............................56 3.8 Docking of test compounds in MAO-B crystal.......................................................58 Chapter 4: Discussion and Conclusions .................................................69 Bibliography…………………………………………………………..…………………………………………………78 iv List of figures Figure 1: Three dimensional structure of human MAO-B. .............................................10 Figure 2: Three dimensional structure of human MAO-A ..............................................14 Figure 3: Oxidative deamination of monoamines catalyzed by MAO-A and MAO-B. .....17 Figure 4: Proposed polar nucleophilic attack mechanism and single electron transfer. 18 Figure 5: Structures of test compounds. .......................................................................24 Figure 6: Conversion of kynuramine to 4-hydroxyquinoline catalyzed by MAO .............28 Figure 7: Effect of test compounds on enzymatic activity of MAO-B. ............................40 Figure 8: Effect of test compounds on enzymatic activity of MAO-A .............................41 Figure 9: Inhibition curves of MAO-B by test compounds..............................................42 Figure 10: Effect of test compounds on acetylcholinesterase activity ............................45 Figure 11: Percentage of free BSA after treatment with test compounds.. ....................49 Figure 12: BSA-binding curves for test compounds ......................................................50 Figure 13: Effect of test compounds on fluorescein level.. ............................................53 Figure 14: Effect of test compounds on Km and Vmax of MAO reaction ...........................55 Figure 15: Effects of test compounds on MAO-B activity at different time points. ..........57 Figure 16: Docking of 5223890 in MAO-B crystal .........................................................59 Figure 17: Docking of 7691778 in MAO-B crystal. ........................................................61 Figure 18: Docking of 7704954 in MAO-B crystal. ........................................................63 Figure 19: Docking of 7738820 in MAO-B crystal. ........................................................65 Figure 20: Docking of F5123-0122 in MAO-B crystal. ...................................................67 v List of tables Table 1: Selectivity, binding reversibility and therapeutic uses of MAO-inhibitors ........... 4 Table 2: Compounds’ ID and their molecular weights. .................................................23 Table 3: IC50 of test compounds against MAO-B and MAO-A. .......................................39 Table 4: IC50 of test compounds against acetylcholinesterase.......................................46 Table 5: log Pe and Pe of test compounds measured by PAMPA ..................................47 Table 6: EC50 of test compound towards BSA ...............................................................48 Table 7: EC50 of test compounds as anti-oxidants. ........................................................53 Table 8: Effect of test compounds on Vmax and Km of MAO-B reaction ...........................54 vi Acknowledgments First and foremost I would like to express heartfelt gratefulness to my family. Without the support and encouragement of my parents, sister and brother, I could not have finished my study. I am grateful for all encouragement and reassurance they gave me. I would like to thank my advisor and mentor Dr. Werner Geldenhuys for giving me the opportunity to work in his laboratory and his invaluable guidance with my research and thesis. Without his guidance and persistent support, this thesis would not have been possible. I would also like to thank Dr. Altaf Darvesh and Dr. Richard Carroll for serving on my thesis committee and providing valuable insights and expert advice on my project. Besides my advisor, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my previous mentor Dr. Thomas Jones for all his support and guidance. Finally, I would like to express my gratitude to Dr. Eric Mintz and Mrs. Judith Wearden for their help and support. vii Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 Parkinson’s disease Parkinson’s disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer’s disease affecting about 1% of people aged more than 65 years old (29). Parkinson’s disease is a chronic progressive motor disorder that is caused by irreversible damage to dopaminergic neurons located in substantia nigra pars compacta of the midbrain (30). Motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease include tremor, rigidity and bradykinesia. Parkinson’s disease is characterized by the presence of Lewy bodies which are intracytoplasmic inclusions from protein aggregates (31). Dopaminergic neuronal death is caused by several factors and the most important factor is oxidative stress. Oxidative stress is a powerful stimulator of microglial activation with subsequent release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (32). Dopaminergic neurons located in substantia nigra have a greater sensitivity to oxidative stress due to reduced levels of glutathione, an important endogenous antioxidant, and increased level of iron in substantia nigra (33)(37). α-synuclein is the major constituent of Lewy bodies and it has been reported to be produced by dying dopaminergic neurons in Parkinson’s disease (34). Both oxidized and nitrated α- synuclein have a detrimental effect on dopaminergic neurons which is mediated 1 2 by microglial activation and subsequent induction of oxidative stress and inflammation (35)(36). There is no permanent cure for Parkinson’s disease, but there are several pharmacological interventions that can help to alleviate motor and non-motor symptoms of the disease. Levodopa, a precursor for dopamine synthesis, is the most important drug that is used in the treatment of for Parkinson’s disease; however it has no effect on non-motor symptoms of the disease (38). Levodopa is usually administered with a decaroboxylase inhibitor such
Recommended publications
  • Review Paper Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors: a Review Concerning Dietary Tyramine and Drug Interactions
    PsychoTropical Commentaries (2016) 1:1 – 90 © Fernwell Publications Review Paper Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors: a Review Concerning Dietary Tyramine and Drug Interactions PK Gillman PsychoTropical Research, Bucasia, Queensland, Australia Abstract This comprehensive monograph surveys original data on the subject of both dietary tyramine and drug interactions relevant to Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOIs), about which there is much outdated, incorrect and incomplete information in the medical literature and elsewhere. Fewer foods than previously supposed have problematically high tyramine levels because international food hygiene regulations have improved both production and handling. Cheese is the only food that has, in the past, been associated with documented fatalities from hypertension, and now almost all ‘supermarket’ cheeses are perfectly safe in healthy-sized portions. The variability of sensitivity to tyramine between individuals, and the sometimes unpredictable amount of tyramine content in foods, means a little knowledge and care are still advised. The interactions between MAOIs and other drugs are now well understood, are quite straightforward, and are briefly summarized here (by a recognised expert). MAOIs have no apparently clinically relevant pharmaco-kinetic interactions, and the only significant pharmaco-dynamic interaction, other than the ‘cheese reaction’ (caused by indirect sympatho-mimetic activity [ISA], is serotonin toxicity ST (aka serotonin syndrome) which is now well defined and straightforward to avoid by not co-administering any drug with serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SRI) potency. There are no therapeutically used drugs, other than SRIs, that are capable of inducing serious ST with MAOIs. Anaesthesia is not contra- indicated if a patient is taking MAOIs. Most of the previously held concerns about MAOIs turn out to be mythical: they are either incorrect, or over-rated in importance, or stem from apprehensions born out of insufficient knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0253056A1 Nemas Et Al
    US 20130253 056A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0253056A1 Nemas et al. (43) Pub. Date: Sep. 26, 2013 (54) CONTINUOUS ADMINISTRATION OF (60) Provisional application No. 61/179,511, filed on May LEVODOPA AND/OR DOPA 19, 2009. DECARBOXYLASE INHIBITORS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR SAME Publication Classification (71) Applicant: NEURODERM, LTD., Ness-Ziona (IL) (51) Int. Cl. A63L/216 (2006.01) (72) Inventors: Mara Nemas, Gedera (IL); Oron (52) U.S. Cl. Yacoby-Zeevi, Moshav Bitsaron (IL) CPC .................................... A6 IK3I/216 (2013.01) USPC .......................................................... 514/538 (73) Assignee: Neuroderm, Ltd., Ness-Ziona (IL) (57) ABSTRACT (21) Appl. No.: 13/796,232 Disclosed herein are for example, liquid aqueous composi (22) Filed: Mar 12, 2013 tions that include for example an ester or salt of levodopa, or an ester or salt of carbidopa, and methods for treating neuro Related U.S. Application Data logical or movement diseases or disorders such as restless leg (63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 12/961,534, syndrome, Parkinson's disease, secondary parkinsonism, filed on Dec. 7, 2010, which is a continuation of appli Huntington's disease, Parkinson's like syndrome, PSP. MSA, cation No. 12/836,130, filed on Jul. 14, 2010, now Pat. ALS, Shy-Drager syndrome, dystonia, and conditions result No. 7,863.336, which is a continuation of application ing from brain injury including carbon monoxide or manga No. 12/781,357, filed on May 17, 2010, now Pat. No. nese intoxication, using Substantially continuous administra 8,193,243. tion of levodopa and/or carbidopa or ester and/or salt thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Trace Amine-Associated Receptor 1 Activation Regulates Glucose-Dependent
    Trace amine-associated receptor 1 activation regulates glucose-dependent insulin secretion in pancreatic beta cells in vitro by ©Arun Kumar A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science Memorial University of Newfoundland FEBRUARY 2021 St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador i Abstract Trace amines are a group of endogenous monoamines which exert their action through a family of G protein-coupled receptors known as trace amine-associated receptors (TAARs). TAAR1 has been reported to regulate insulin secretion from pancreatic beta cells in vitro and in vivo. This study investigates the mechanism(s) by which TAAR1 regulates insulin secretion. The insulin secreting rat INS-1E -cell line was used for the study. Cells were pre-starved (30 minutes) and then incubated with varying concentrations of glucose (2.5 – 20 mM) or KCl (3.6 – 60 mM) for 2 hours in the absence or presence of various concentrations of the selective TAAR1 agonist RO5256390. Secreted insulin per well was quantified using ELISA and normalized to the total protein content of individual cultures. RO5256390 significantly (P < 0.0001) increased glucose- stimulated insulin secretion in a dose-dependent manner, with no effect on KCl-stimulated insulin secretion. Affymetrix-microarray data analysis identified genes (Gnas, Gng7, Gngt1, Gria2, Cacna1e, Kcnj8, and Kcnj11) whose expression was associated with changes in TAAR1 in response to changes in insulin secretion in pancreatic beta cell function. The identified potential links to TAAR1 supports the regulation of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion through KATP ion channels.
    [Show full text]
  • S41598-021-90243-1.Pdf
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Metabolomics and computational analysis of the role of monoamine oxidase activity in delirium and SARS‑COV‑2 infection Miroslava Cuperlovic‑Culf1,2*, Emma L. Cunningham3, Hossen Teimoorinia4, Anuradha Surendra1, Xiaobei Pan5, Stefany A. L. Bennett2,6, Mijin Jung5, Bernadette McGuiness3, Anthony Peter Passmore3, David Beverland7 & Brian D. Green5* Delirium is an acute change in attention and cognition occurring in ~ 65% of severe SARS‑CoV‑2 cases. It is also common following surgery and an indicator of brain vulnerability and risk for the development of dementia. In this work we analyzed the underlying role of metabolism in delirium‑ susceptibility in the postoperative setting using metabolomic profling of cerebrospinal fuid and blood taken from the same patients prior to planned orthopaedic surgery. Distance correlation analysis and Random Forest (RF) feature selection were used to determine changes in metabolic networks. We found signifcant concentration diferences in several amino acids, acylcarnitines and polyamines linking delirium‑prone patients to known factors in Alzheimer’s disease such as monoamine oxidase B (MAOB) protein. Subsequent computational structural comparison between MAOB and angiotensin converting enzyme 2 as well as protein–protein docking analysis showed that there potentially is strong binding of SARS‑CoV‑2 spike protein to MAOB. The possibility that SARS‑CoV‑2 infuences MAOB activity leading to the observed neurological and platelet‑based complications of SARS‑CoV‑2 infection requires further investigation. COVID-19 is an ongoing major global health emergency caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coro- navirus SARS-CoV-2. Patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 show a range of features including fever, anosmia, acute respiratory failure, kidney failure and gastrointestinal issues and the death rate of infected patients is estimated at 2.2%1.
    [Show full text]
  • PSP: Some Answers
    PSP: Some Answers Lawrence I. Golbe, MD Professor of Neurology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Director of Clinical Affairs and Scientific Advisory Board Chairman, CurePSP October 2017 What is Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP)? Of the approximately five to seven of every 100,000 people in Canada with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), few, if any, had ever heard of the disease before their diagnosis. In fact, most patients with PSP report that their family doctors knew nothing about it until a neurologist made the diagnosis. As of now, three of every four people with a diagnosis of PSP could have been diagnosed earlier, if their doctor had suspected it and performed the appropriate examination. However, it is appearing in medical journals more and more often, which will help doctors become familiar with PSP. This pamphlet should help patients and their families do the same. Why has no one heard of PSP? PSP is rare: no one even realized it existed until 1963, when several patients were first described at a national neurology research convention and the disease was given its name. In retrospect, at least 12 cases of PSP had appeared in the medical literature between 1909 and 1962, but because of its resemblance to Parkinson’s, it wasn’t recognized as a distinct disease. The brain under the microscope is almost identical to that of “post-encephalitic parkinsonism,” a common condition in the early 20th century but now nearly extinct, which also made for erroneous diagnoses during that era. Although PSP is slightly more common than the well-known amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (called ALS, or Lou Gehrig’s disease in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Acetylcholinesterase and Monoamine Oxidase-B Inhibitory Activities By
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Acetylcholinesterase and monoamine oxidase‑B inhibitory activities by ellagic acid derivatives isolated from Castanopsis cuspidata var. sieboldii Jong Min Oh1, Hyun‑Jae Jang2, Myung‑Gyun Kang3, Soobin Song2, Doo‑Young Kim2, Jung‑Hee Kim2, Ji‑In Noh1, Jong Eun Park1, Daeui Park3, Sung‑Tae Yee1 & Hoon Kim1* Among 276 herbal extracts, a methanol extract of Castanopsis cuspidata var. sieboldii stems was selected as an experimental source for novel acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors. Five compounds were isolated from the extract by activity‑guided screening, and their inhibitory activities against butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), monoamine oxidases (MAOs), and β‑site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE‑1) were also evaluated. Of these compounds, 4′‑O‑(α‑l‑rhamnopyranosyl)‑ 3,3′,4‑tri‑O‑methylellagic acid (3) and 3,3′,4‑tri‑O‑methylellagic acid (4) efectively inhibited AChE with IC50 values of 10.1 and 10.7 µM, respectively. Ellagic acid (5) inhibited AChE (IC50 = 41.7 µM) less than 3 and 4. In addition, 3 efectively inhibited MAO‑B (IC50 = 7.27 µM) followed by 5 (IC50 = 9.21 µM). All fve compounds weakly inhibited BChE and BACE‑1. Compounds 3, 4, and 5 reversibly and competitively inhibited AChE, and were slightly or non‑toxic to MDCK cells. The binding energies of 3 and 4 (− 8.5 and − 9.2 kcal/mol, respectively) for AChE were greater than that of 5 (− 8.3 kcal/mol), and 3 and 4 formed a hydrogen bond with Tyr124 in AChE. These results suggest 3 is a dual‑targeting inhibitor of AChE and MAO‑B, and that these compounds should be viewed as potential therapeutics for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment Protocol Copyright © 2018 Kostoff Et Al
    Prevention and reversal of Alzheimer's disease: treatment protocol Copyright © 2018 Kostoff et al PREVENTION AND REVERSAL OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE: TREATMENT PROTOCOL by Ronald N. Kostoffa, Alan L. Porterb, Henry. A. Buchtelc (a) Research Affiliate, School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA (b) Professor Emeritus, School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA (c) Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, USA KEYWORDS Alzheimer's Disease; Dementia; Text Mining; Literature-Based Discovery; Information Technology; Treatments Prevention and reversal of Alzheimer's disease: treatment protocol Copyright © 2018 Kostoff et al CITATION TO MONOGRAPH Kostoff RN, Porter AL, Buchtel HA. Prevention and reversal of Alzheimer's disease: treatment protocol. Georgia Institute of Technology. 2018. PDF. https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/59311 COPYRIGHT AND CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE COPYRIGHT Copyright © 2018 by Ronald N. Kostoff, Alan L. Porter, Henry A. Buchtel Printed in the United States of America; First Printing, 2018 CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE This work can be copied and redistributed in any medium or format provided that credit is given to the original author. For more details on the CC BY license, see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/>. DISCLAIMERS The views in this monograph are solely those of the authors, and do not represent the views of the Georgia Institute of Technology or the University of Michigan. This monograph is not intended as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians. The reader should regularly consult a physician in matters relating to his/her health and particularly with respect to any symptoms that may require diagnosis or medical attention.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Phenelzine and Other Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitor
    British Journal of Phammcology (1995) 114. 837-845 B 1995 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0007-1188/95 $9.00 The effects of phenelzine and other monoamine oxidase inhibitor antidepressants on brain and liver 12 imidazoline-preferring receptors Regina Alemany, Gabriel Olmos & 'Jesu's A. Garcia-Sevilla Laboratory of Neuropharmacology, Department of Fundamental Biology and Health Sciences, University of the Balearic Islands, E-07071 Palma de Mallorca, Spain 1 The binding of [3H]-idazoxan in the presence of 106 M (-)-adrenaline was used to quantitate 12 imidazoline-preferring receptors in the rat brain and liver after chronic treatment with various irre- versible and reversible monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors. 2 Chronic treatment (7-14 days) with the irreversible MAO inhibitors, phenelzine (1-20 mg kg-', i.p.), isocarboxazid (10 mg kg-', i.p.), clorgyline (3 mg kg-', i.p.) and tranylcypromine (10mg kg-', i.p.) markedly decreased (21-71%) the density of 12 imidazoline-preferring receptors in the rat brain and liver. In contrast, chronic treatment (7 days) with the reversible MAO-A inhibitors, moclobemide (1 and 10 mg kg-', i.p.) or chlordimeform (10 mg kg-', i.p.) or with the reversible MAO-B inhibitor Ro 16-6491 (1 and 10 mg kg-', i.p.) did not alter the density of 12 imidazoline-preferring receptors in the rat brain and liver; except for the higher dose of Ro 16-6491 which only decreased the density of these putative receptors in the liver (38%). 3 In vitro, phenelzine, clorgyline, 3-phenylpropargylamine, tranylcypromine and chlordimeform dis- placed the binding of [3H]-idazoxan to brain and liver I2 imidazoline-preferring receptors from two distinct binding sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Azilect, INN-Rasagiline
    SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION 1. Introduction AZILECT is indicated for the treatment of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (PD) as monotherapy (without levodopa) or as adjunct therapy (with levodopa) in patients with end of dose fluctuations. Rasagiline is administered orally, at a dose of 1 mg once daily with or without levodopa. Parkinson’s disease is a common neurodegenerative disorder typified by loss of dopaminergic neurones from the basal ganglia, and by a characteristic clinical syndrome with cardinal physical signs of resting tremor, bradikinesia and rigidity. The main treatment aims at alleviating symptoms through a balance of anti-cholinergic and dopaminergic drugs. Parkinson’s disease (PD) treatment is complex due to the progressive nature of the disease, and the array of motor and non-motor features combined with early and late side effects associated with therapeutic interventions. Rasagiline is a chemical inhibitor of the enzyme monoamine oxidase (MAO) type B which has a major role in the inactivation of biogenic and diet-derived amines in the central nervous system. MAO has two isozymes (types A and B) and type B is responsible for metabolising dopamine in the central nervous system; as dopamine deficiency is the main contributing factor to the clinical manifestations of Parkinson’s disease, inhibition of MAO-B should tend to restore dopamine levels towards normal values and this improve the condition. Rasagiline was developed for the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson’s disease both as monotherapy in early disease and as adjunct therapy to levodopa + aminoacids decarboxylase inhibitor (LD + ADI) in patients with motor fluctuations. 2. Quality Introduction Drug Substance • Composition AZILECT contains rasagiline mesylate as the active substance.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Lasting Analgesic Effect of the Psychedelic Drug Changa: a Case Report
    CASE REPORT Journal of Psychedelic Studies 3(1), pp. 7–13 (2019) DOI: 10.1556/2054.2019.001 First published online February 12, 2019 Long-lasting analgesic effect of the psychedelic drug changa: A case report GENÍS ONA1* and SEBASTIÁN TRONCOSO2 1Department of Anthropology, Philosophy and Social Work, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain 2Independent Researcher (Received: August 23, 2018; accepted: January 8, 2019) Background and aims: Pain is the most prevalent symptom of a health condition, and it is inappropriately treated in many cases. Here, we present a case report in which we observe a long-lasting analgesic effect produced by changa,a psychedelic drug that contains the psychoactive N,N-dimethyltryptamine and ground seeds of Peganum harmala, which are rich in β-carbolines. Methods: We describe the case and offer a brief review of supportive findings. Results: A long-lasting analgesic effect after the use of changa was reported. Possible analgesic mechanisms are discussed. We suggest that both pharmacological and non-pharmacological factors could be involved. Conclusion: These findings offer preliminary evidence of the analgesic effect of changa, but due to its complex pharmacological actions, involving many neurotransmitter systems, further research is needed in order to establish the specific mechanisms at work. Keywords: analgesic, pain, psychedelic, psychoactive, DMT, β-carboline alkaloids INTRODUCTION effects of ayahuasca usually last between 3 and 5 hr (McKenna & Riba, 2015), but the effects of smoked changa – The treatment of pain is one of the most significant chal- last about 15 30 min (Ott, 1994). lenges in the history of medicine. At present, there are still many challenges that hamper pain’s appropriate treatment, as recently stated by American Pain Society (Gereau et al., CASE DESCRIPTION 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • POISONING with ANTIDEPRESSANTS and DEPRIVATION (1999-2003) • Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors
    ADMISSION EPISODES TO POISONS TREATMENT POISONING WITH UNIT, CARDIFF 1997 ANTIDEPRESSANTS SIMPLE AND NARCOTIC ANALGESICS 57% HYPNOTICS/ANXIOLYTICS 33% ANTIDEPRESSANTS 22% NEUROLEPTIC DRUGS 7% ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUGS 6% Philip A Routledge Dept Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Wales College of Medicine Number of admission episodes Cardiff University WALES, UK WHY ARE ANTIDEPRESSANTS MORTALITY FOR ANTIDEPRESSANT STILL USED? POISONING BY ENGLISH STRATEGIC HEALTH AUTHORITY, 2000-2003 • Depression is common • The morbidity and mortality is high • Non-drug treatments are often unsatisfactory Morgan O et al. Health Statistics Quarterly 2005; 27: 6-12 MORTALITY FOR ANTIDEPRESSANT POISONING POISONING WITH ANTIDEPRESSANTS AND DEPRIVATION (1999-2003) • Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors • Tricyclic Antidepressants (TCAs) • Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) • Others Morgan O et al. Health Statistics Quarterly 2005; 27: 6-12 1 MONOAMINE OXIDASE ENZYMES MONOAMINE OXIDASE (MAOs) INHIBITORS (MAOIs) Dopamine Phenylephrine Tyramine Serotonin (5HT) Norepinephrine Norepinephrine Tyramine • First generation MAOIs Dopamine – Phenelzine (Nardil) Phenylephrine – Tranylcypromine Tyramine – Isocarboxazid MAOI -A MAOI-B • Reversible inhibitors (RIMAs) – Moclobemide (Manerix) MAOI FIRST GENERATION MONOAMINE REVERSIBLE INHIBITORS OF OXIDASE INHIBITORS (MAOIs) RIMA MONOAMINE OXIDASE A (RIMAs) Dopamine Dopamine Phenylephrine Phenylephrine Tyramine Serotonin Serotonin (5HT) (5HT) Norepinephrine Norepinephrine Norepinephrine Norepinephrine
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2016/001643 Al 7 January 2016 (07.01.2016) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2016/001643 Al 7 January 2016 (07.01.2016) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (74) Agents: GILL JENNINGS & EVERY LLP et al; The A61P 25/28 (2006.01) A61K 31/194 (2006.01) Broadgate Tower, 20 Primrose Street, London EC2A 2ES A61P 25/16 (2006.01) A61K 31/205 (2006.01) (GB). A23L 1/30 (2006.01) (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (21) International Application Number: kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, PCT/GB20 15/05 1898 AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, (22) International Filing Date: DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, 29 June 2015 (29.06.2015) HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, (25) Filing Language: English KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, (26) Publication Language: English PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, (30) Priority Data: SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, 141 1570.3 30 June 2014 (30.06.2014) GB TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. 1412414.3 11 July 2014 ( 11.07.2014) GB (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (71) Applicant: MITOCHONDRIAL SUBSTRATE INVEN¬ kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, TION LIMITED [GB/GB]; 39 Glasslyn Road, London GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, N8 8RJ (GB).
    [Show full text]