DOCSLIB.ORG

Chestnut Lamprey Ichthyomyzon Castaneus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chestnut Lamprey Ichthyomyzon Castaneus COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Chestnut Lamprey Ichthyomyzon castaneus Great Lakes - Upper St. Lawrence Populations Saskatchewan - Nelson River Populations in Canada DATA DEFICIENT 2010 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2010. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Chestnut Lamprey Ichthyomyzon castaneus (Great Lakes - Upper St. Lawrence populations and Saskatchewan - Nelson River populations) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xii + 35 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Previous report(s): Lanteigne, Jacqueline. 1991. COSEWIC status report on the Chestnut Lamprey Ichthyomyzon castaneus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1 – 24 pp. Production note: COSEWIC acknowledges Claude Renaud for writing the provisional status report on the Chestnut Lamprey, Ichthyomyzon castaneus. The contractor’s involvement with the writing of the status report ended with the acceptance of the provisional report. Any modifications to the status report during the subsequent preparation of the 6-month interim status report were overseen by Dr. John Post, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Freshwater Fishes Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la lamproie brune (Ichthyomyzon castaneus) Populations des Grands Lacs et du haut Saint-Laurent et Populations des rivières Saskatchewan et Nelson au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Chestnut Lamprey — Adult Chestnut Lamprey in lateral view. Photographed by Douglas A. Watkinson, Freshwater Institute, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Winnipeg. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2011. Catalogue No. CW69-14/622-2011E-PDF ISBN 978-1-100-18611-5 Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – November 2010 Common name Chestnut Lamprey - Great Lakes - Upper St. Lawrence populations Scientific name Ichthyomyzon castaneus Status Data Deficient Reason for designation Insufficient information exists for assessment purposes. The occurrence of this species in the Great Lakes – Upper St. Lawrence basin has been confirmed with recent collections of 2 adults and correction to the identification of 4 adults from museum collections. No further information on distribution, abundance or habitat is available for this species. Occurrence Ontario, Quebec Status history The species was considered a single unit and designated Special Concern in April 1991. Split into two populations in November 2010. The “Great Lakes - Upper St. Lawrence populations” unit was considered in November 2010 and placed in the Data Deficient category. Assessment Summary – November 2010 Common name Chestnut Lamprey - Saskatchewan - Nelson River populations Scientific name Ichthyomyzon castaneus Status Data Deficient Reason for designation Insufficient information exists for assessment purposes. This species’ Saskatchewan - Nelson River populations unit is broadly distributed but has not been abundant where surveyed. It has been observed at 20 sites in total in this region. No information is available on population size or trends. Although prairie rivers are generally subject to agriculturally derived sedimentation, herbicides, pesticides and eutrophication, no information is available on specific threats to this species. Occurrence Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario Status history The species was considered a single unit and designated Special Concern in April 1991. Split into two populations in November 2010. The “Saskatchewan - Nelson River populations” unit was was considered in November 2010 and placed in the Data Deficient category. iii COSEWIC Executive Summary Chestnut Lamprey Ichthyomyzon castaneus Species information The Chestnut Lamprey is a parasitic species that attains a maximum size of 363 mm in total length as an adult and 165 mm as a larva. It has a single indented dorsal fin. Larger larvae (greater than approximately 95 mm) can be distinguished from all other Canadian lampreys by the presence of darkly pigmented lateral line organs. Adults can be distinguished from the two other Canadian lamprey species that have a single dorsal fin, Silver Lamprey and Northern Brook Lamprey, by possessing usually a total of six bicuspid inner lateral teeth, compared to usually none. There are two designatable units: a Saskatchewan-Nelson River DU and a Great Lakes-Upper St. Lawrence DU. This parasitic lamprey species is found in Canada (Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, and Québec) and the United States (19 contiguous states from North Dakota to Texas), but its closest relative, the Southern Brook Lamprey, a nonparasitic species, is only found in the United States. Distribution The Chestnut Lamprey is only found in North America, being distributed in Canada and the United States. In Canada, it is found in Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario and Québec, occurring in two biogeographic zones: the Saskatchewan-Nelson River zone and the Great Lakes-Upper St. Lawrence zone. Habitat The Chestnut Lamprey spends its entire life in fresh waters. It is found in lakes and rivers of various sizes. Biology The Chestnut Lamprey lives an undetermined number of years (presumed to be 5-7) as a filter-feeding larva mostly spent buried or partially buried in the bottom of streams. It begins transformation in the fall, acquiring an oral disc with teeth. It lives about 18 months as an adult, feeding on the blood and other body fluids of a variety of fishes. It reproduces in the spring and dies shortly after. iv Population sizes and trends Twenty-seven extant populations are known across its Canadian range. Most collections consist of a single specimen. The population sizes are unknown, but the largest grouping of this species observed in Canada (about 50 individuals) occurred during a spawning event. No trend can be inferred as collections have been made very intermittently and, with one exception, the Assiniboine River, Manitoba, the collection effort has not been quantified. Limiting factors and threats Two of seven populations in the Great Lakes Basin are or were subjected to chemical applications to control the invasive Sea Lamprey. Existing protection The federal Fisheries Act prohibits the destruction of fish habitat. The Chestnut Lamprey was assessed as Vulnerable (= Special Concern) by the COSEWIC in April 1991 and is listed as Special Concern on Schedule 3 of SARA. This assessment, however, applied only to the provinces of Saskatchewan and Manitoba, because the populations in Ontario and Québec were only discovered after 1991. Both the Saskatchewan-Nelson River populations and the Great Lakes Upper-St-Laurence populations were presented as two separate units and designated Data Deficient by COSEWIC in November 2010. v TECHNICAL SUMMARY – DU1 Genus species Ichthyomyzon castaneus Chestnut Lamprey Lamproie brune Great Lakes-Upper St. Lawrence populations Populations des Grands Lacs et du haut Saint- Laurent Range of occurrence in Canada: Ontario, Québec Demographic Information Generation time (usually average age of parents in the 8 yrs population) Is there an observed continuing decline in number of mature Unknown individuals? Estimated percent of continuing decline in total number of Unknown; only three specimens mature individuals within 2 generations. collected within the last two generations (16 yrs) Observed percent reduction in total number of mature individuals Unknown; only three specimens over the last 3 generations. collected over the last three generations (24 yrs) Projected or suspected percent reduction in total number of Unknown mature individuals over the next 3 generations. Suspected percent reduction in total number of mature Unknown individuals over any 3 generations period, over a time period including both the past and the future. Are the causes of the decline clearly reversible and understood No and ceased? Are there extreme fluctuations in number of mature individuals? No Extent and Occupancy Information Estimated extent of occurrence (Based on Table 1) 301,013 km² Area of Occupancy (AO) Index of area of occupancy (IAO) (Based on Table 1) 1,528 km² 2 X 2 km grid Is the total population severely fragmented? Yes Number of “locations” 6 Is there an observed, inferred, or projected continuing decline in No extent of occurrence? Is there an observed, inferred, or projected continuing decline in No index of area of occupancy? Is there an observed, inferred, or projected continuing decline in No. although perhaps the number of populations? Chippewa River (ON) population is extirpated Is there an observed, inferred, or projected continuing decline in No, although perhaps the number of locations? Chippewa River (ON) population is extirpated Is there an observed, inferred, or projected continuing decline in No area, extent and/or quality of habitat? Are there extreme fluctuations in number of populations? No Are there extreme fluctuations in number of locations? No Are there extreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence? No See definition of location in COSEWIC O&P Manual. vi Are there extreme fluctuations in index of area of occupancy? No Number of Mature Individuals (in each population) Population N Mature Individuals
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tennessee Fish Species
    The Angler’s Guide To TennesseeIncluding Aquatic Nuisance SpeciesFish Published by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Cover photograph Paul Shaw Graphics Designer Raleigh Holtam Thanks to the TWRA Fisheries Staff for their review and contributions to this publication. Special thanks to those that provided pictures for use in this publication. Partial funding of this publication was provided by a grant from the United States Fish & Wildlife Service through the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Authorization No. 328898, 58,500 copies, January, 2012. This public document was promulgated at a cost of $.42 per copy. Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency is available to all persons without regard to their race, color, national origin, sex, age, dis- ability, or military service. TWRA is also an equal opportunity/equal access employer. Questions should be directed to TWRA, Human Resources Office, P.O. Box 40747, Nashville, TN 37204, (615) 781-6594 (TDD 781-6691), or to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office for Human Resources, 4401 N. Fairfax Dr., Arlington, VA 22203. Contents Introduction ...............................................................................1 About Fish ..................................................................................2 Black Bass ...................................................................................3 Crappie ........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Lampreys of the St. Joseph River Drainage in Northern Indiana, with an Emphasis on the Chestnut Lamprey (Ichthyomyzon Castaneus)
    2015. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 124(1):26–31 DOI: LAMPREYS OF THE ST. JOSEPH RIVER DRAINAGE IN NORTHERN INDIANA, WITH AN EMPHASIS ON THE CHESTNUT LAMPREY (ICHTHYOMYZON CASTANEUS) Philip A. Cochran and Scott E. Malotka1: Biology Department, Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota, 700 Terrace Heights, Winona, MN 55987 USA Daragh Deegan: City of Elkhart Public Works and Utilities, Elkhart, IN 46516 USA ABSTRACT. This study was initiated in response to concern about parasitism by lampreys on trout in the Little Elkhart River of the St. Joseph River drainage in northern Indiana. Identification of 229 lampreys collected in the St. Joseph River drainage during 1998–2012 revealed 52 American brook lampreys (Lethenteron appendix), one northern brook lamprey (Ichthyomyzon fossor), 130 adult chestnut lampreys (I. castaneus), five possible adult silver lampreys (I. unicuspis), and 41 Ichthyomyzon ammocoetes. The brook lampreys are non-parasitic and do not feed as adults, so most if not all parasitism on fish in this system is due to chestnut lampreys. Electrofishing surveys in the Little Elkhart River in August 2013 indicated that attached chestnut lampreys and lamprey marks were most common on the larger fishes [trout (Salmonidae), suckers (Catostomidae), and carp (Cyprinidae)] at each of three sites. This is consistent with the known tendency for parasitic lampreys to select larger hosts. Trout in the Little Elkhart River may be more vulnerable to chestnut lamprey attacks because they are relatively large compared to alternative hosts such as suckers. Plots of chestnut lamprey total length versus date of capture revealed substantial variability on any given date.
    [Show full text]
  • Part IV: Scoring Criteria for the Index of Biotic Integrity to Monitor
    Part IV: Scoring Criteria for the Index of Biotic Integrity to Monitor Fish Communities in Wadeable Streams in the Coosa and Tennessee Drainage Basins of the Ridge and Valley Ecoregion of Georgia Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division Fisheries Management Section 2020 Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………… ……... Pg. 1 Map of Ridge and Valley Ecoregion………………………………..……............... Pg. 3 Table 1. State Listed Fish in the Ridge and Valley Ecoregion……………………. Pg. 4 Table 2. IBI Metrics and Scoring Criteria………………………………………….Pg. 5 References………………………………………………….. ………………………Pg. 7 Appendix 1…………………………………………………………………. ………Pg. 8 Coosa Basin Group (ACT) MSR Graphs..………………………………….Pg. 9 Tennessee Basin Group (TEN) MSR Graphs……………………………….Pg. 17 Ridge and Valley Ecoregion Fish List………………………………………Pg. 25 i Introduction The Ridge and Valley ecoregion is one of the six Level III ecoregions found in Georgia (Part 1, Figure 1). It is drained by two major river basins, the Coosa and the Tennessee, in the northwestern corner of Georgia. The Ridge and Valley ecoregion covers nearly 3,000 square miles (United States Census Bureau 2000) and includes all or portions of 10 counties (Figure 1), bordering the Piedmont ecoregion to the south and the Blue Ridge ecoregion to the east. A small portion of the Southwestern Appalachians ecoregion is located in the upper northwestern corner of the Ridge and Valley ecoregion. The biotic index developed by the GAWRD is based on Level III ecoregion delineations (Griffith et al. 2001). The metrics and scoring criteria adapted to the Ridge and Valley ecoregion were developed from biomonitoring samples collected in the two major river basins that drain the Ridge and Valley ecoregion, the Coosa (ACT) and the Tennessee (TEN).
    [Show full text]
  • Lamprey, Hagfish
    Agnatha - Lamprey, Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Super Class: Agnatha Hagfish Agnatha are jawless fish. Lampreys and hagfish are in this class. Members of the agnatha class are probably the earliest vertebrates. Scientists have found fossils of agnathan species from the late Cambrian Period that occurred 500 million years ago. Members of this class of fish don't have paired fins or a stomach. Adults and larvae have a notochord. A notochord is a flexible rod-like cord of cells that provides the main support for the body of an organism during its embryonic stage. A notochord is found in all chordates. Most agnathans have a skeleton made of cartilage and seven or more paired gill pockets. They have a light sensitive pineal eye. A pineal eye is a third eye in front of the pineal gland. Fertilization of eggs takes place outside the body. The lamprey looks like an eel, but it has a jawless sucking mouth that it attaches to a fish. It is a parasite and sucks tissue and fluids out of the fish it is attached to. The lamprey's mouth has a ring of cartilage that supports it and rows of horny teeth that it uses to latch on to a fish. Lampreys are found in temperate rivers and coastal seas and can range in size from 5 to 40 inches. Lampreys begin their lives as freshwater larvae. In the larval stage, lamprey usually are found on muddy river and lake bottoms where they filter feed on microorganisms. The larval stage can last as long as seven years! At the end of the larval state, the lamprey changes into an eel- like creature that swims and usually attaches itself to a fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Asatiwisipe Aki Management Plan – Poplar River First Nation
    May 2011 ASATIWISIPE AKI MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL DRAFT May, 2011 Poplar River First Nation ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND SPECIAL THANKS benefit of our community. She has been essential to documenting our history and traditional use and occupancy. The most important acknowledgement goes to our ancestors who loved and cherished this land and cared for it for centuries to ensure all Thanks go to the Province of Manitoba for financial assistance and to future generations would have life. Their wisdom continues to guide us the staff of Manitoba Conservation for their assistance and support. today in our struggles to keep the land in its natural beauty as it was created. We are very grateful to all of our funders and particularly to the Metcalf Foundation for its support and for believing in the importance of a The development and completion of the Asatiwisipe Aki Lands Lands Management Plan for our community. We would also like to thank Management Plan has occurred because of the collective efforts of many. the Canadian Boreal Initiative for their support. Our Elders have been the driving force for guidance, direction and motivation for this project and it is their wisdom, knowledge, and Meegwetch experience that we have captured within the pages of our Plan. Our Steering Committee of Elders, youth, Band staff and Council, and other community members have worked tirelessly to review and provide Poplar River First Nation feedback on the many maps, text and other technical materials that have Land Management Plan Project been produced as part of this process. Community Team Members We, the Anishinabek of Poplar River First Nation, have been fortunate Thanks go to the following people for their time, energy and vision.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Criteria Used in IUCN Assessment Overestimate Area of Occupancy for Freshwater Taxa
    Spatial Criteria Used in IUCN Assessment Overestimate Area of Occupancy for Freshwater Taxa By Jun Cheng A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto © Copyright Jun Cheng 2013 Spatial Criteria Used in IUCN Assessment Overestimate Area of Occupancy for Freshwater Taxa Jun Cheng Masters of Science Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto 2013 Abstract Area of Occupancy (AO) is a frequently used indicator to assess and inform designation of conservation status to wildlife species by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). The applicability of the current grid-based AO measurement on freshwater organisms has been questioned due to the restricted dimensionality of freshwater habitats. I investigated the extent to which AO influenced conservation status for freshwater taxa at a national level in Canada. I then used distribution data of 20 imperiled freshwater fish species of southwestern Ontario to (1) demonstrate biases produced by grid-based AO and (2) develop a biologically relevant AO index. My results showed grid-based AOs were sensitive to spatial scale, grid cell positioning, and number of records, and were subject to inconsistent decision making. Use of the biologically relevant AO changed conservation status for four freshwater fish species and may have important implications on the subsequent conservation practices. ii Acknowledgments I would like to thank many people who have supported and helped me with the production of this Master’s thesis. First is to my supervisor, Dr. Donald Jackson, who was the person that inspired me to study aquatic ecology and conservation biology in the first place, despite my background in environmental toxicology.
    [Show full text]
  • Good-Lampreys-Hard-To-Find.Pdf
    G ood L ampreys A re H ard to F ind ~~~~~~~ by N eal D. Mundahl Winona State University, Winona, MN 55987, [email protected] Illustrations © Joseph R. Tomelleri Most Minnesotans who know anything about lampreys Clandestine Life seem to hate them. But should we? Yes, I realize that the sea lamprey has wreaked havoc with fish in Lake Superior. All of Minnesota’s lampreys have similar life cycles. And yes, we’ve spent lots of money trying to control it Adult lampreys ascend streams to spawn from late April and deal with the consequences of its parasitic lifestyle. to mid-June, depending on locale and species. Awaiting But what about Minnesota’s “other” lampreys, our native the onset of spawning, lampreys hide beneath rocks or species. Are they just as bad? other objects in fast riffles. I once found an American Six species of lampreys live in Minnesota. Our five brook lamprey under a discarded oven door in the South native lampreys are much smaller and far less destructive Fork of the Zumbro River near Rochester. than their distant non-native cousin. Only two native Adults move out of riffles and just upstream to chestnut lamprey, Ichthyomyzon castaneus species—the silver and the chestnut lamprey—share the spawning areas in loose groups. I’ve watched as many as sea lamprey’s behavior of preying on other fish, and they a dozen lampreys move out of hiding within a few minutes seldom have a noticeable effect on their prey populations. and begin to spawn. What stimulates them to begin their Our three other natives—American brook, northern spawning activities together remains a mystery.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to List US Populations of Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser Fulvescens)
    Petition to List U.S. Populations of Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) as Endangered or Threatened under the Endangered Species Act May 14, 2018 NOTICE OF PETITION Submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on May 14, 2018: Gary Frazer, USFWS Assistant Director, [email protected] Charles Traxler, Assistant Regional Director, Region 3, [email protected] Georgia Parham, Endangered Species, Region 3, [email protected] Mike Oetker, Deputy Regional Director, Region 4, [email protected] Allan Brown, Assistant Regional Director, Region 4, [email protected] Wendi Weber, Regional Director, Region 5, [email protected] Deborah Rocque, Deputy Regional Director, Region 5, [email protected] Noreen Walsh, Regional Director, Region 6, [email protected] Matt Hogan, Deputy Regional Director, Region 6, [email protected] Petitioner Center for Biological Diversity formally requests that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”) list the lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) in the United States as a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §§1531-1544. Alternatively, the Center requests that the USFWS define and list distinct population segments of lake sturgeon in the U.S. as threatened or endangered. Lake sturgeon populations in Minnesota, Lake Superior, Missouri River, Ohio River, Arkansas-White River and lower Mississippi River may warrant endangered status. Lake sturgeon populations in Lake Michigan and the upper Mississippi River basin may warrant threatened status. Lake sturgeon in the central and eastern Great Lakes (Lake Huron, Lake Erie, Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River basin) seem to be part of a larger population that is more widespread.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Lamprey Research and Restoration
    May 2000 PACIFIC LAMPREY RESEARCH AND RESTORATION PROJECT THIS IS INVISIBLE TEXT TO KEEP VERTICAL ALIGNMENT THIS IS INVISIBLE TEXT TO KEEP VERTICAL ALIGNMENT THIS IS INVISIBLE TEXT TO KEEP VERTICAL ALIGNMENT THIS IS INVISIBLE TEXT TO KEEP VERTICAL ALIGNMENT THIS IS INVISIBLE TEXT TO KEEP VERTICAL ALIGNMENT THIS IS INVISIBLE TEXT TO KEEP VERTICAL ALIGNMENT Annual Report 1998 DOE/BP-00000248-1 This report was funded by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), U.S. Department of Energy, as part of BPA's program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife affected by the development and operation of hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia River and its tributaries. The views of this report are the author's and do not necessarily represent the views of BPA. This document should be cited as follows: Close, David A. - Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, Pacific Lamprey Research and Restoration Project, Report to Bonneville Power Administration, Contract No. 00000248-1, Project No. 199402600, 94 electronic pages (BPA Report DOE/BP-00000248-1) This report and other BPA Fish and Wildlife Publications are available on the Internet at: http://www.efw.bpa.gov/cgi-bin/efw/FW/publications.cgi For other information on electronic documents or other printed media, contact or write to: Bonneville Power Administration Environment, Fish and Wildlife Division P.O. Box 3621 905 N.E. 11th Avenue Portland, OR 97208-3621 Please include title, author, and DOE/BP number in the request. PACIFIC LAMPREY RESEARCH AND RESTORATION PROJECT ANNUAL REPORT 1998 Prepared by: David A. Close Tribal Fisheries Program Department of Natural Resources Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Pendleton, OR Prepared for: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Lessons About Lampreys Don Orth
    Learning Lessons about Lampreys Don Orth 11 American Currents Vol. 43, No. 3 LEARNING LESSONS ABOUT LAMPREYS Don Orth Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, Virginia Lampreys are simple fish that leave me with many ques- tiative emerged. Will the Pacific Lamprey ever recover? The tions. Lampreys and hagfishes are genetically very similar Lost Fish movie tells an all too familiar story (Freshwaters and represent the oldest living groups of vertebrates (Fig- Illustrated 2015) of the loss of important fish populations ure 1). These two lineages of Chordates arose well before the before scientists even have a chance to discover their distri- appearance of jawed fishes. Lampreys and hagfish persisted butions and uniqueness (Carim et al. 2017; Wade et al. 2018). through at least four of five mass extinction events on Earth. Joni Mitchell’s lyrics from “Big Yellow Taxi” seem appropri- How did they survive when most other marine organisms ate here. perished? What does their presence today indicate? “Don’t it always seem to go Studies of evolutionary history tell us that the appear- That you don’t know what you’ve got till it’s gone ance of the cranium, eyes, pineal gland, inner ear, olfactory They paved paradise rosettes, lateral line, large brain, and muscular heart, were And put up a parking lot” first evident in the lamprey. In fact, the body form of lam- A common genus of lampreys in eastern USA drainages preys is essentially the same as a 360 million-year-old fos- is Ichthyomyzon, which includes six species. Ichthyomyzon sil lamprey (Gess et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Key to the Fishes of Indiana
    IF ANNOTATED KEY TO THE FISHES OF INDIANA Joseph S. Nelson and Shelby D. Gerking Department of Zoology, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana Aquatic Research Unit Project Number 342-303-815 March, 1968 INN MN UM OM MI NMI 11111111 MI IIIIII NMI OM MS ill MI NM NM NM OM it Draft Copy ANNOTATED KEY TO THE FISHES OF INDIANA Joseph S. Nelson and Shelby D. Gerking Introduction This annotated key provides a means of identifying fishes presently occurring or known to have occurred in Indiana and gives a rough indication of their range and distribution within the state. Recent changes in nomenclature, additional diagnostic characters, and distributional changes are combined with information from the detailed analyses of Indiana fishes by Gerking (1945, 1955). Geography The state of Indiana covers 36,291 square miles. It extends 265 miles 1 in a north-south direction between the extremes of 41046t and 37°46 N latitude and 160 miles in an east-west direction between the extremes of 84°47' and 88°061 W longitude. Its northern border includes the southern tip of Lake Michigan and extends along part of the southern border of Michigan state. Ohio lies along most of the eastern border, the Ohio River, with Kentucky to the south,comprises the southern border, while Illinois lies along the western border. Approximately the northern sixth of Indiana lies in the Lake Michigan- Lake Erie watershed; the remainder is in the Mississippi drainage, composed primarily of the Wabash and Ohio rivers and their tributaries (Fig. 1). The elevation of the state is highest in the east central portion with the highest ° 1 point at 1257 feet in the northeastern corner of Wayne County, 40 00 N; 84°51' W.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Biota
    Low Gradient, Cool, Headwaters and Creeks Macrogroup: Headwaters and Creeks Shawsheen River, © John Phelan Ecologist or State Fish Game Agency for more information about this habitat. This map is based on a model and has had little field-checking. Contact your State Natural Heritage Description: Cool, slow-moving, headwaters and creeks of low-moderate elevation flat, marshy settings. These small streams of moderate to low elevations occur on flats or very gentle slopes in watersheds less than 39 sq.mi in size. The cool slow-moving waters may have high turbidity and be somewhat poorly oxygenated. Instream habitats are dominated by glide-pool and ripple-dune systems with runs interspersed by pools and a few short or no distinct riffles. Bed materials are predominenly sands, silt, and only isolated amounts of gravel. These low-gradient streams may have high sinuosity but are usually only slightly entrenched with adjacent Source: 1:100k NHD+ (USGS 2006), >= 1 sq.mi. drainage area floodplain and riparian wetland ecosystems. Cool water State Distribution:CT, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, VA, temperatures in these streams means the fish community WV contains a higher proportion of cool and warm water species relative to coldwater species. Additional variation in the stream Total Habitat (mi): 16,579 biological community is associated with acidic, calcareous, and neutral geologic settings where the pH of the water will limit the % Conserved: 11.5 Unit = Acres of 100m Riparian Buffer distribution of certain macroinvertebrates, plants, and other aquatic biota. The habitat can be further subdivided into 1) State State Miles of Acres Acres Total Acres headwaters that drain watersheds less than 4 sq.mi, and have an Habitat % Habitat GAP 1 - 2 GAP 3 Unsecured average bankfull width of 16 feet or 2) Creeks that include larger NY 41 6830 94 325 4726 streams with watersheds up to 39 sq.mi.
    [Show full text]