Spring Trials
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Roots of Human Resistance to Animal Rights: Psychological and Conceptual Blocks
Roots of Human Resistance to Animal Rights: Psychological and Conceptual Blocks © Steven J. Bartlett 8 Animal L. 143 (2002) Publish Date: 2002 Place of Publication: http://www.animallaw.info/articles/arussbartlett2002.htm Roots of Human Resistance to Animal Rights: Psychological and Conceptual Blocks Animal law has focused attention on such interconnected issues as the property status of nonhuman animals, juristic personhood, and standing. These subjects are undeniably central concerns that dominate discussions of animal rights, but they do not relate to the most fundamental factors that are responsible both for human resistance to animal rights and for our species' well-entrenched, cruel, and self-righteous exploitation and destruction of nonhuman animals. In this comment, the author reviews recent advocacy of animal rights and offers the first study of human psychological and conceptual blocks that stand in the way of efforts on behalf of animal law and legislation. Paying long overdue attention to these obstacles provides a realistic framework for evaluating the effectiveness of attempts to initiate meaningful change. I am in favour of animal rights as well as human rights. That is the way of a whole human being. -- Abraham Lincoln I. INTRODUCTION: ANIMALS AS PROPERTY--IS THIS THE PROBLEM? Animals are property. These three words--and their legal implications and practical ramifications--define the most significant doctrines and cases . and the realities for current practitioners of animal law. [FN1] For many people in our society, the concept of legal rights for other animals is quite "unthinkable." That is because our relationship with the majority of animals is one in which we exploit them: we eat them, hunt them and use them in a variety of ways that are harmful to the animals. -
The Sexual Politics of Meat by Carol J. Adams
THE SEXUAL POLITICS OF MEAT A FEMINISTVEGETARIAN CRITICAL THEORY Praise for The Sexual Politics of Meat and Carol J. Adams “A clearheaded scholar joins the ideas of two movements—vegetari- anism and feminism—and turns them into a single coherent and moral theory. Her argument is rational and persuasive. New ground—whole acres of it—is broken by Adams.” —Colman McCarthy, Washington Post Book World “Th e Sexual Politics of Meat examines the historical, gender, race, and class implications of meat culture, and makes the links between the prac tice of butchering/eating animals and the maintenance of male domi nance. Read this powerful new book and you may well become a vegetarian.” —Ms. “Adams’s work will almost surely become a ‘bible’ for feminist and pro gressive animal rights activists. Depiction of animal exploita- tion as one manifestation of a brutal patriarchal culture has been explored in two [of her] books, Th e Sexual Politics of Meat and Neither Man nor Beast: Feminism and the Defense of Animals. Adams argues that factory farming is part of a whole culture of oppression and insti- tutionalized violence. Th e treatment of animals as objects is parallel to and associated with patriarchal society’s objectifi cation of women, blacks, and other minorities in order to routinely exploit them. Adams excels in constructing unexpected juxtapositions by using the language of one kind of relationship to illuminate another. Employing poetic rather than rhetorical techniques, Adams makes powerful connec- tions that encourage readers to draw their own conclusions.” —Choice “A dynamic contribution toward creating a feminist/animal rights theory.” —Animals’ Agenda “A cohesive, passionate case linking meat-eating to the oppression of animals and women . -
Stallwood Collection Inventory Books.Numbers !1 of 33! Stallwood Collection Books 19/10/2013 Angell Geo
Stallwood Collection Books 19/10/2013 Aberconway Christabel A Dictionary of Cat Lovers London Michael Joseph 1949 0718100131 Abram David The Spell of the Sensuous New York Vintage Books 1997 0679776397 Acampora Ralph Corporal Compassion: Animal ethics and philosophy of body Pittsburgh, PA University of Pittsburgh Press 2006 822942852 Acciarini Maria Chiara Animali: I loro diritti i nostri 'doveri Roma Nuova Iniziativa Editoriale SpA LibraryThing Achor Amy Blount Animal Rights: A Beginner's Guide Yellow Springs, WriteWare, Inc. 1992 0963186507 OH Achor Amy Blount Animal Rights: A Beginner's Guide Yellow Springs, WriteWare, Inc. 1996 0963186507 OH Ackerman Diane The Zookeeper’s Wife London Old Street Publishing 2008 9781905847464 Adams Carol J. The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical New York Continuum 1990 0826404553 Theory Adams Carol J. The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical New York Continuum 1991 0826404553 Theory Adams Carol J., ed. Ecofeminism and the Sacred New York Continuum 1993 0883448408 Adams Carol J. Neither Man Nor Beast: Feminism and the Defense of Animals New York Continuum 1994 0826408036 Adams Carol J. Neither Man Nor Beast: Feminism and the Defense of Animals New York Continuum 1995 0826408036 Adams Carol J. and Josephine Animals & Women: Feminist Theoretical Explorations Durham, NC Duke University Press 1995 0822316676 Donovan, eds. Adams Carol J. and Josephine Beyond Animal Rights: A Feminist Caring Ethic for the New York Continuum 1996 0826412599 Donovan, eds. Treatment of Animals Adams Bluford E Pluribus Barnum: The great showman & the making of the Minneapolis, MN University of Minnesota Press 1997 0816626316 U.S. popular culture Adams Carol J. -
Roots of Human Resistance to Animal Rights: Psychological and Conceptual Blocks
\\Server03\productn\L\LCA\8-1\LCA105.txt unknown Seq: 1 14-MAY-02 15:16 ROOTS OF HUMAN RESISTANCE TO ANIMAL RIGHTS: PSYCHOLOGICAL AND CONCEPTUAL BLOCKS By Steven J. Bartlett* Animal law has focused attention on such interconnected issues as the prop- erty status of nonhuman animals, juristic personhood, and standing. These subjects are undeniably central concerns that dominate discussions of animal rights, but they do not relate to the most fundamental factors that are responsible both for human resistance to animal rights and for our spe- cies' well-entrenched, cruel, and self-righteous exploitation and destruction of nonhuman animals. In this comment, the author reviews recent advocacy of animal rights and offers the first study of human psychological and con- ceptual blocks that stand in the way of efforts on behalf of animal law and legislation. Paying long overdue attention to these obstacles provides a real- istic framework for evaluating the effectiveness of attempts to initiate mean- ingful change. I am in favour of animal rights as well as human rights. That is the way of a whole human being. ÐAbraham Lincoln I. INTRODUCTION: ANIMALS AS PROPERTYÐIS THIS THE PROBLEM? Animals are property. These three wordsÐand their legal implications and practical ramificationsÐdefine the most significant doctrines and cases . and the realities for current practitioners of animal law.1 For many people in our society, the concept of legal rights for other animals is quite ªunthinkable.º That is because our relationship with the * Senior Research Professor of Philosophy, Oregon State University; Visiting Scholar in Psychology & Philosophy, Willamette University; Previously Professor of Philosophy, St. -
Imagining Planetarity: Toward a Postcolonial Franciscan Theology of Creation
Imagining Planetarity: Toward a Postcolonial Franciscan Theology of Creation Author: Daniel P. Horan Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:107266 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2016 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Department of Theology IMAGINING PLANETARITY: TOWARD A POSTCOLONIAL FRANCISCAN THEOLOGY OF CREATION A Dissertation By DANIEL P. HORAN, O.F.M. Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2016 © Copyright 2016 Daniel P. Horan, O.F.M. All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT IMAGINING PLANETARITY: TOWARD A POSTCOLONIAL FRANCISCAN THEOLOGY OF CREATION Daniel P. Horan, O.F.M. Advisor: Brian D. Robinette, Ph.D. The proliferation in recent decades of “stewardship model” approaches for developing a theology of creation, which places human beings at the center of the cosmos as caretakers or managers of the divine oikos, is the result of an intentional effort to correct overtly problematic “dominion model” approaches that have contributed both to reifying a sense of human sovereignty and the resulting environmental degradation. However, the first part of this dissertation argues that the stewardship model of creation actually operates under many of the same problematic presuppositions as the dominion model, and therefore does not offer a correction but rather a tacit re-inscription of the very same pitfalls. After close consideration and analysis of the stewardship model, this dissertation identifies scriptural, theological, and philosophical sources to support the adoption of a “kinship” or “community of creation” model. -
Suffering-Focused Ethics
Suffering-Focused Ethics Defense and Implications Magnus Vinding Ratio Ethica Ratio Ethica, Copenhagen. Copyright © 2020 Magnus Vinding Parts of this book have previously been published elsewhere by the author. ISBN: 9798624910911 Contents Introduction .............................................. 1 Part I: The Case for Suffering-Focused Ethics 1: Asymmetries Between Happiness and Suffering ................ 13 2: Happiness as the Absence of Suffering ....................... 39 3: Creating Happiness at the Price of Suffering Is Wrong ........... 52 4: The Principle of Sympathy for Intense Suffering ................ 60 5: A Moral Realist Case for Minimizing Extreme Suffering ......... 75 6: Other Arguments for Focusing on Suffering ................... 93 7: Biases Against Focusing on Suffering ....................... 111 8: Objections Against Focusing on Suffering ................... 141 Part II: How Can We Best Reduce Suffering? 9: Uncertainty Is Big ..................................... 185 10: We Should Be Cooperative .............................. 205 11: Non-Human Animals and Expansion of the Moral Circle . 214 12: Promoting Concern for Suffering ......................... 228 13: The Abolitionist Project ................................ 239 14: Reducing S-Risks ..................................... 247 15: Donating to Reduce Suffering ........................... 256 16: Researching the Question ............................... 261 17: The Importance of Self-Investment ....................... 266 18: What You Can Do ................................... -
Humane Education Past, Present, and Future 3CHAPTER
Humane Education Past, Present, and Future 3CHAPTER Bernard Unti and Bill DeRosa Introduction rom the earliest years of orga- need to correct children’s cruelty. tance of a virtuous citizenry devoted nized animal protection in “This tendency should be watched in to republican principles of gover- FNorth America, humane educa- them, and, if they incline to any such nance. This made education of the tion—the attempt to inculcate the cruelty, they should be taught the boy especially critical, since as a man kindness-to-animals ethic through contrary usage,” Locke wrote. “For he would assume authority over fami- formal or informal instruction of chil- the custom of tormenting and killing ly, chattel, property, and social insti- dren—has been cast as a fruitful other animals will, by degrees, harden tutions. Responsibility for educating response to the challenge of reducing their hearts even toward men; and the child for his leadership role rested the abuse and neglect of animals. Yet, they who delight in the suffering and with women, who were assumed to be almost 140 years after the move- destruction of inferior creatures, will the repositories of gentle virtue, com- ment’s formation, humane education not be apt to be very compassionate passionate feeling, and devotion— remains largely the province of local or benign to those of their own kind” buffers against the heartless struggle societies for the prevention of cruelty (Locke 1989). of the masculine public sphere. and their educational divisions—if Over time Locke’s insight raised Humane education provided one they have such divisions. Efforts to interest in the beneficial moral effect means of insulating boys against the institutionalize the teaching of of childhood instruction favoring the tyrannical tendencies that might humane treatment of animals within kindly treatment of animals. -
Course No. 102..Sociology of Family, Marriage and Kinship
Directorate of Distance Education UNIVERSITY OF JAMMU JAMMU STUDY MATERIAL For M.A. SOCIOLOGY (SEMESTER-IST) TITLE : SOCIOLOGY OF FAMILY, KINSHIP AND MARRIAGE SESSION 2020 COURSE No. SOC-C-102 LESSON No. 1-20 Course Co-ordinator : Teacher Incharge : PROF. ABHA CHAUHAN DR. NEHA VIJ H.O.D., Deptt. of Sociology P. G. Sociology University of Jammu. University of Jammu. http:/wwwdistanceeducationju.in Printed and Published on behalf of the Directorate of Distance Education, University of Jammu, Jammu by the Director, DDE University of Jammu, Jammu. 1 SCRIPT WRITERS * Prof. B.K. Nagla * Prof. Madhu Nagla * Prof. J.R. Panda * Prof. Ashish Saxena * Prof. Abha Chauhan * Prof. Vishav Raksha * Prof. Neeru Sharma * Dr. Hema Gandotra * Dr. Neharica Subhash * Dr. Nisha Sharma * Dr. Kuljeet Singh © Directorate of Distance Education, University of Jammu, Jammu 2020 • All rights reserved . No part of this work may be reproduced in any form, by mimeograph or any other means, without permission in writing from the DDE , University of Jammu. • The script writer shall be responsible for the lesson/script submitted to the DDE and any plagiarism shall be his / her entire responsibility. Printed by : Sushil Printers /2020/650 2 Syllabus of Sociology M.A. lst Semester To be held in the year Dec. 2019, 2020 & 2021 (Non-CBCS) Course No. SOC-C-102 Title : Sociology of Family, Kinship and Marriage Credits : 6 Max. Marks : 100 Duration of examination : 2 & 1/2 hrs. (a) Semester examination : 80 (b) Sessional assessment : 20 Objectives : To demonstrate to the students the universally acknowledged social importance of Family and Kinship structure and familiarize them with the rich diversity in the types of networks of relationship created by genealogical links of marriage and other social ties. -
Rethinking Gandhi and Nonviolent Relationality: Global Perspectives
Rethinking Gandhi and Nonviolent Relationality This book presents a rethinking of the world legacy of Mahatma Gandhi in this era of global violence. Through interdisciplinary research, key Gandhian concepts are revisited by tracing their genealogies in multiple histories of world contact and by foregrounding their relevance to contemporary struggles to regain the ‘humane’ in the midst of global conflict. The relevance of Gandhian notions of ahimsa and satyagraha is assessed in the context of contemporary events, when religious fundamentalisms of various kinds are competing with the arrogance and unilateralism of imperial capital to reduce the world to a state of international lawlessness. Covering a wide and comprehensive range of topics such as Gandhi’s vegetarianism and medical practice, the book analyzes his successes and failures as a liti- gator in South Africa, his experiments with communal living and his con- cepts of non-violence and satyagraha. The book combines historical, philosophical and textual readings of dif- ferent aspects of the leader’s life and works. It will be of interest to students and academics interested in peace and conflict studies, South Asian history, world history, postcolonial studies and studies on Gandhi. Debjani Ganguly is Head of the Humanities Research Centre in the Research School of Humanities at the Australian National University. Author of Caste, Colonialism and Countermodernity: Notes on a Postcolonial Herme- neutics of Caste (also published by Routledge), she also co-edited Edward Said: The Legacy -
Special Historical Issue As We Approach Our 100Th Anniversary
T H E Latham Letter VOLUME XXXVIII, NUMBER 3 SUMMER 2017 PROMOTING RESPECT FOR ALL LIFE THROUGH EDUCATION Single Issue Price: $5.00 Special Historical Issue as We Approach Our 100th Anniversary A Fresh Look at the Lathams ~ By Bernard Unti, Ph.D. See page 7 The Latest Link News page 6 Research News: Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Guinea Pigs page 17 Edith Latham’s MANDATE: “To promote, foster, encourage and further the principles of humaneness, kindness and benevolence to all living creatures.” The Latham Letter Balanced perspectives on humane issues and activities Subscriptions: $15 One year US. Canadian or Mexican subscribers, please add $5 per year for postage. All other countries, please add $12 per year. All amounts US Dollars. Subscribe at www.latham.org. © 2017 The Latham Foundation for the Associate Memberships: Support our work and receive exclusive online distribution Promotion of Humane Education of each Latham Letter plus 20% discounts on videos, DVDs, and publications. $30 One year. Join online at www.latham.org. Search the Latham Letter archives by topic and learn more about all our products and services at www.Latham.org or call 510-521-0920. The Latham Foundation, 1320 Harbor Bay Pkwy, Suite 200, Alameda, CA 94502-6581 Volume XXXVIII, Number 3, Summer 2017 Balanced perspectives on humane issues and activities EDITORIAL: Expectations: Humane Education and Common Sense . 4 By Hugh H. Tebault, III, President The Latham Letter is published quarterly by The Latham Foundation, Of Note ............................5 1320 Harbor Bay Pkwy, Suite 200, Alameda, CA 94502-6581. Subscription Rates: $15.00 One Year Latham Sponsors Link Meeings ................6 Publisher and Editor Hugh H. -
Organized Animal Protection in the United
CHAPTER IX EMOTIONAL BONDS, RELIGIOUS MORALITY, AND EVOLUTIONARY KINSHIP Until recently, scholarly commentary concerning animal protection has generally emphasized the primary importance of Darwinism's assertion of human and animal kinship to the emergence of organized animal protection in both England and North America. 1 In fact., personal experience with animals and religious values, not reflections or anxieties occasioned by the theoryof biological kinship between humans and animals, were the decisive influences on humane thought and conduct during the first decades of activism in the United States, as in other nations. Darwinian ideas about the continuity between human and animal life did not motivate the individuals who launched the American humane movement, and evolutionarydoctrine did not surface as an explicit argument for animal protection until the 1890s. Instead, early humane leaders in the United States built their arguments upon older views of the relationship between humans and animals. In making the case that animals deserved better treatment, humane advocates relied upon a popular knowledgeof animals that emphasizedtheir individuality, consciousness, and mental capacities, and acknowledged them as beings with whom people could form emotional bonds. Animal 1 SeeJames c. Turner.Rcctorioe With die Beas: Animals. Pain, and Huroaoity in the Victorian Mind(Baltimore: JohnsHopkim University �. 1980), 00-78;Linda Gordon, Heroes of TheirOwn Lives: ThePolitics and History of Family Violence(New York: Viking. 1988), 34; andSylvia Sperling, AnimalLiberators Rese@rch and Motality (Berkeley: Universityof Californial>rc:$, 1988), 21-22. 3.Sl 352 protectionists also drew uponlongstanding religious views concerning human stewardship, animal souls, and the practiceof such Christian virtues as kindness and mercy. -
The Subtleties of Speciesism
The Subtleties of Speciesism Jon Wynne-Tyson Fontwell, Sussex, England vocabulary, the term is already quite widely used, but perhaps too narrowly. For some it equates with little more than cruelty to animals or, more tamely, with a nonbenevolent attitude to other species. The dictionary definition is: A prejudice or attitude of bias toward the interests ofmembers ofone's own species and against those of members of other species. A word used to describe the widespread discrim ination that is practised by Homo sapiens against the other species. There is no doubt tbat in the West we are increasingly awareof, and concernedabout, ourcontributions to the But the best words in a language are not those that suffering ofother creatures. Many"":"-understandably and merely pinpoint an object or a concept, but those that often admirably-feel best able to express that concern become an active humanizing tool by inserting the thin by visible lobbying, demonstration, and all-important end of a wedge in our uhderstanding. If we study and changes in personal lifestyle. Where sufficient pressure interpret the term "speciesism", it can deepen and has been exerted, some individual and corporate acts enrich our view of the problem that has at last begun of gross cruelty have been modified, and some changes to engage human sympathy. "Problem," however, is in legislation effected. Some cosmetic companies, for too small a word. Our abuse of the environment shared a quiet life, have bowed to public revulsion over the by all sentient and non-sentient life is at last being better publicized examples of the most extreme cases seen as the major material challenge of our time, of suffering inflicted for commercial profit; some second only to that of reducing and controlling the furriers have gone out of business, if not VOluntarily; human world population.