DOCSLIB.ORG

Deciphering and Reproducing Old Documents Paleography, Extraction, Transcription, Abstraction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Deciphering and Reproducing Old Documents Paleography, Extraction, Transcription, Abstraction By Mindy Taylor AG® Paleography- The study and analysis of old handwriting in order to read documents with accuracy and fluency. • Know alphabetical characters in different hands. • Know how to interpret abbreviations. Alphabetical Characters English Handwriting Styles- • Book-1100-1500 https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/manuscriptsandspecialcollections/researchguidance/me dievaldocuments/handwritingstyles.aspx • Court-1300-1700 Wright's Court Hand Restored http://www.archive.org/details/courthandrestor00wrig • Secretary-1400-1800 mostly obsolete by 1750 Guide to the Basics of English Secretary Hand by Kathryn James https://beinecke.library.yale.edu/article/quarantine-reading-learn-read-secretary-hand Secretary Hand Alphabet and Abbreviation Examples http://rycote.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/palaeography-introduction FamilySearch.org wiki Secretary Hand https://www.familysearch.org/indexing/help/handwriting#!/lang=en&title=Alphabet%2 0(Secretary%20Hand) • Italic- 1500-1800 • Round- since the 1800’s Obsolete Letter Forms • Long s derived from the old Roman cursive s (ſ). Used in the middle of a word up to the early 19th century. Transcribe as s. ©2020 Mindy Taylor, AG® • ff at the beginning of a word is the early form of the capital letter F. Generally, it was transcribed as F, however in Diplomatic conventions it could be transcribed as ff. Paleography Tutorials- BYU Script tutorial https://script.byu.edu/ English Handwriting Online 1500-1700 https://www.english.cam.ac.uk/ceres/ehoc/ National Archive Paleography 1500-1800 https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/palaeography/ Latin Word Lists- Article by Kimberly Powell https://www.thoughtco.com/latin-genealogical-word-list-1422735 FamilySearch.org https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Latin_Genealogical_Word_ https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/img_auth.php/3/35/Latin_Genealogical_Word_L ist.pdf Interpreting Abbreviations- • Shortened word with or without a period • Superscript • Brevigraph • A line or tilde above a word Folger Shakespeare Library Early Modern Manuscripts Online https://emmo.folger.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Early- Modern_Abbreviations.pdf Bodleian Libraries Secretary Hand Abbreviations http://rycote.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/Palaeography-Guide-abbreviations Reproducing Documents Extraction- An exact copy of a selected piece of a document. • Copy information exactly as it appears in the document. • Use quotation marks. Transcription- An exact copy of a document with the original grammar, punctuation, spelling, abbreviations, notes, and marks copied as faithfully as possible in a handwritten or typed format. • Diplomatic: a faithful reproduction of the original document including spelling, punctuation, lineation, superscripts, and abbreviations rendered as closely as typographically possible. u/v, i/j, ff, superscripts, abbreviations, are maintained. Thorn transcribed as y. ©2020 Mindy Taylor, AG® • Semi-Diplomatic: same as Diplomatic but allows transcriber to expand contractions and lower superscripts. Most used for scholarly transcriptions. Paleography tutorials, searchability, readability. brevigraphs replaced with modern equivalent, y=thorn replaced with th. Conventions- Early Modern Manuscripts Online https://emmo.folger.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/EMMO-transcription- conventions.pdf Semi-Diplomatic Convention- English Handwriting Online 1500-1700 https://www.english.cam.ac.uk/ceres/ehoc/ BYU Script Tutorial https://script.byu.edu/Pages/paleography/home Creating a Transcript- • Read through the entire document first for context. • Note the words that are easy to recognize, use them to identify more difficult words. • Turn off spell check/grammar autocorrect option. • Always include a source citation at the top of the page. • Keep the line length and page format the same as the original document if possible. • In a document that is a form you can italicize handwritten information. Add a note at the top of the document [Note: handwritten portions are in italics.] In Client Reports • Short transcriptions or extractions should be enclosed in quotations. • Long transcriptions should be presented as an indented paragraph. Use of Square Brackets (Do not use round parentheses when transcribing) • Used to indicate something that is not in the original text. • Used to insert a comment, correction, interpretation, or clarification. • Signals an issue with legibility. [?]-Letters or words that you are not sure about. [illegible] [3 words illegible] [paragraph illegible]-For text you can’t read. If you assume a word use disch[arg?]ed. If you know what the word should be use Alex[and]er. Use of Curly Brackets • Used to indicate something that is missing or too damaged to read. { } -For text that is missing. {torn} {ink blot}-Description to clarify a problem. If page is torn and you know what it should read Chur{ch}. How to use [sic] • Sic is Latin for “so, thus.” It is used to indicate that something that is incorrectly written is intentionally being left as it was in the original. The goal of a transcript is to reproduce exactly what you see so using [sic] would be redundant. • Place [sic] right after the error. ©2020 Mindy Taylor, AG® • In genealogical transcriptions only use [sic] when necessary for understanding that there is an actual error in the document, not just a misspelling. Handwriting • Letters can be compared with other letters in the document or other documents in the same hand. • Use the context of what is being said to figure out words. • Use handwriting or alphabet samples for different hands. Script.byu.edu and FamilySearch.org wiki. Superscripts, Underlined, Crossed Out, and Inserted Text • Should be included as presented. • If you cannot accurately represent something with your word processor include a note of explanation or use square brackets. Diacritical Marks • A mark added to a letter to indicate a special pronunciation (ā). • There are 11 types of marks. Punctuation Marks • Stop ( . ) Pause ( : or ; ). • Commas (│ or , ). • Slash ( / ) can be used as a period. • Dash ( _ ) instead of a period. • Long dashes (—) used to fill space. • Double lined hyphen (=) to break words at the end of a line. Seals • Draw in seals when handwriting a transcription. • Type in the word “Seal” wherever it is positioned on the document when typing a transcription. Dates • Dates should be transcribed exactly as they are presented. • Do not ‘interpret’ old-style calendar dating as modern equivalents. Transcribe the letter you see • Letters u and v were sometimes used interchangeably, unto=vnto and even=euen. • j was a variation of the letter i and could be used both as vowel and consonant. Roman numerals xiij for xiii. Creating an Abstract- An abbreviated copy of a document that records all the important details but leaves out excess wording and boilerplate language. (Boilerplate- A unit of writing used in legal documents that can be reused over and over without change.) • Always include a citation at the top of the document. • Preserve exact arrangement of data. • Use same language and tense. • Copy names and dates exactly. • Include anything that is described or traceable. • Reproduce signatures and signature marks faithfully. ©2020 Mindy Taylor, AG® .
Recommended publications
  • Understanding Handwriting, Abbreviations, Dates and More Dan Poffenberger, AG® British Research Specialist ~ Family History Library Poffenbergerds@Familysearch.Org

    Understanding Handwriting, Abbreviations, Dates and More Dan Poffenberger, AG® British Research Specialist ~ Family History Library [email protected]

    Understanding Handwriting, Abbreviations, Dates and More Dan Poffenberger, AG® British Research Specialist ~ Family History Library [email protected] Introduction Searching English records can be daunting enough when you are simply worrying about the time period, content and availability of records. A dive into a variety of records may leave you perplexed when you consider the handwriting styles, Latin, numbering systems, calendar changes, and variety of jurisdictions, record formats and abbreviations that may be found in the records. Objectives The objective of this course is to help you better understand: • Handwriting and Abbreviations • Latin • Numbers and Money • Calendars, Dates, Days, Years • Church of England Church Records Organization and Jurisdictions • Relationships Handwriting and Abbreviations Understanding the handwriting is the most important aspect to understanding older English records. If you can’t read it, you’re going to have a very hard time understanding it. While the term ‘modern English’ applies to any writing style after medieval times (late 1400’s), it won’t seem like it when you try reading some of it. More than 90% of your research will involve one of two primary English writing scripts or ‘hands’. These are ‘Secretary hand’ which was primarily in use from about 1525 to the mid-1600’s. Another handwriting style in use during that time was ‘Humanistic hand’ which more resembles our more modern English script. As secretary and humanistic hand came together in the mid-1600’s, English ‘round hand’ or ‘mixed hand’ became the common style and is very similar to handwriting styles in the 1900’s. But of course, who writes anymore? Round or Mixed Hand Starting with the more recent handwriting styles, a few of the notable differences in our modern hand are noted here: ‘d’ – “Eden” ‘f’ - “of” ‘p’ - “Baptized’ ss’ – “Edward Hussey” ‘u’ and ‘v’ – become like the ‘u’ and ‘v’ we know today.
  • Paläographie Der Neuzeit

    Paläographie Der Neuzeit

    Paläographie der Neuzeit: (traditionellerweise oft „Schriftenkunde der Neuzeit“). Früher typisch im Kanon der archivischen Fächer situiert als reines Hilfsmittel (Vermittlung von Lesefähigkeiten für die Lektüre frühneuzeitlicher Archivalien). Grundlegendes Problem der Literatur: es existieren zwar viele Überblicke zu „nationalen“ Schriftentwicklungen in den europäischen Ländern, aber kaum eine Übersicht über die Gesamtperspektive. Späte Verwissenschaftlichung nach dem Vorbild der Paläographie des Mittelalters erst im 20. Jahrhundert, zuvor polemische metawissenschaftliche Diskussion etwa zur Fraktur-Antiqua-Debatte. „Zweischriftigkeit“: Deutschsprachige Texte werden bis zur Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts immer in Kurrent (auch: Deutsche Schreibschrift) geschrieben, fremdsprachige Texte und Einschübe in deutschen Texten dagegen in aus dem humanistischen Schriftbereich abgeleiteten Schreibschriften. Grundsätzlich findet überall in Europa die Entwicklung der frühneuzeitlichen Schriften in zwei parallelen Bereichen statt: einerseits eine Weiterführung älterer spätgotischer Kursiven (mit teilweise charakteristischen „nationalen“ Einzelmerkmalen), andererseits eine Weiterentwicklung der aus Italien importierten humanistischen Kanzleischriften. In den einzelnen Regionen Europas wird dabei der „gotische“ Schriftstrang unterschiedlich früh oder spät auslaufen; am spätesten im deutschen Sprachraum (Kurrent als Schulausgangsschrift bis 1941 gelehrt). In der Frühen Neuzeit zunehmend dichte Publikation von gedruckten Schreibmeisterbüchern; diese ermöglichen
  • Evaluating the Impact of the Long-S Upon 18Th-Century Encyclopedia Britannica Automatic Subject Metadata Generation Results Sam Grabus

    Evaluating the Impact of the Long-S Upon 18Th-Century Encyclopedia Britannica Automatic Subject Metadata Generation Results Sam Grabus

    ARTICLES Evaluating the Impact of the Long-S upon 18th-Century Encyclopedia Britannica Automatic Subject Metadata Generation Results Sam Grabus ABSTRACT This research compares automatic subject metadata generation when the pre-1800s Long-S character is corrected to a standard < s >. The test environment includes entries from the third edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica, and the HIVE automatic subject indexing tool. A comparative study of metadata generated before and after correction of the Long-S demonstrated an average of 26.51 percent potentially relevant terms per entry omitted from results if the Long-S is not corrected. Results confirm that correcting the Long-S increases the availability of terms that can be used for creating quality metadata records. A relationship is also demonstrated between shorter entries and an increase in omitted terms when the Long-S is not corrected. INTRODUCTION The creation of subject metadata for individual documents is long known to support standardized resource discovery and analysis by identifying and connecting resources with similar aboutness.1 In order to address the challenges of scale, automatic or semi-automatic indexing is frequently employed for the generation of subject metadata, particularly for academic articles, where the abstract and title can be used as surrogates in place of indexing the full text. When automatically generating subject metadata for historical humanities full texts that do not have an abstract, anachronistic typographical challenges may arise. One key challenge is that presented by the historical “Long-S” < ſ >. In order to account for these idiosyncrasies, there is a need to understand the impact that they have upon the automatic subject indexing output.
  • Public Libraries, Archives and Museums: Trends in Collaboration and Cooperation

    Public Libraries, Archives and Museums: Trends in Collaboration and Cooperation

    International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions IFLA Professional Reports, No. 108 108 Public Libraries, Archives and Museums: Trends in Collaboration and Cooperation Alexandra Yarrow, Barbara Clubb and Jennifer-Lynn Draper for the Public Libraries Section Standing Committee Copyright 2008 International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions Public Libraries, Archives and Museums: Trends in Collaboration and Cooperation / Alexandra Yarrow, Barbara Clubb and Jennifer-Lynn Draper. The Hague, IFLA Headquarters, 2008. – 50p. 30 cm. – (IFLA Professional Reports: 108) ISBN 978-90-77897-28-7 ISSN 0168-1931 Table of Contents Executive Summary 4 Introduction: Why Collaborate and Cooperate? 5 Project Proposal 6 Research Methods 7 Literature Review 8 Collaborative Programming Community and Heritage Programs 10 Museum/Art Pass Programs 13 Collaborative Electronic Resources Global Initiatives 16 Continental Initiatives 16 National Initiatives 17 Regional and Local Initiatives 20 Joint-use/Integrated Facilities Minimal Integration 25 Selective Integration 27 Full Integration 28 Guide to Collaboration Best Practices 31 A Successful Collaboration, from Start to Finish 32 Creating Collaborative Electronic Resources: Special Considerations 34 Benefits and Risks of Collaboration 35 Risk Management Strategies 36 Conclusion 37 Contributors 38 Acknowledgements 39 Works Consulted 41 1 Executive Summary This report examines the recent trends in collaboration and cooperation between public libraries, archives and museums. In many cases, the shared or similar missions of the institutions reviewed make them ideal partners in collaborative ventures. Different types of collaborative projects are examined, including exhibits, community programs, digital resources and joint-use facilities. Examples come from Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom (UK), as well as from Russia, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Germany, Italy, Spain, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand.
  • Archival Selection Criteria

    Archival Selection Criteria

    Edinburgh University Library EDINBURGH UNIVERSITY ARCHIVES Archival Selection Criteria General Background This document provides some basic guidance on how to identify records holding potential archival value. As mentioned in section 4d of “Developing a retention schedule” you must decide whether any of your records have long-term research value for historical or other purposes. If so, and if the University Archivist agrees, the records can be designated part of the University’s official archives. Much of the guidance contained in “Developing a Retention Schedule” is also relevant to the archival selection process. Discovering what records you have, identifying duplicated or related records, determining legal requirements and deciding how long to keep the records may already have isolated the core of potential archives from your area of work. By applying some basic archival selection criteria you should be able to define the archive still more clearly, either by reducing or adding to your list of what may need to be preserved permanently as the unique archives of the University. Aims Probably less than five per cent of records generated by the University need to be preserved permanently as archives. The archival process therefore aims to preserve only a small selection of records. These will reflect and provide the essential evidence of the University’s most significant functions and activities, and will also serve legitimate research needs either on the part of the University itself or the wider academic and public user community. The surviving archives should show what the University has done and why, how it was organised and operated, and its effect on the wider community.
  • The Role of Archival and Manuscript Research in the Investigation of Translator Decision-Making

    The Role of Archival and Manuscript Research in the Investigation of Translator Decision-Making

    This is a repository copy of The role of archival and manuscript research in the investigation of translator decision-making. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/84758/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Munday, J (2013) The role of archival and manuscript research in the investigation of translator decision-making. Target, 25 (1). 125 - 139. ISSN 0924-1884 https://doi.org/10.1075/target.25.1.10mun Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ The role of archival and manuscript research in the investigation of translator decision-making Jeremy Munday, University of Leeds, UK Abstract This paper discusses the application of research methodologies from history and literary studies to the analysis of the translation process.
  • The Discursive Construction of Archival Science: Conceptual Foundations of a Discipline in Construction

    The Discursive Construction of Archival Science: Conceptual Foundations of a Discipline in Construction

    Thiago Henrique Bragato Barros and João Batista Ernesto de Moraes. 2011. The discursive construction of archival science: Conceptual foundations. In Smiraglia, Richard P., ed. Proceedings from North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization, Vol. 3. Toronto, Canada, pp. 196-206. Thiago Henrique Bragato Barros ([email protected]) and João Batista Ernesto de Moraes ([email protected]) Universidade Estadual Paulista, Marília SP Brazil The Discursive Construction of Archival Science: Conceptual Foundations of a Discipline in Construction Abstract: This work outlines a theoretical background established in Archival Science based mainly on discourse analysis as a key discipline to understand which the differences are and points of concep- tual commonality in the area. Uses the French Discourse Analysis as a principle with a theoretical and methodological framework to typify the archive as a discursive practice defined by their historical aspects of its institutional junctures. The study of discourse helps to understand how certain linguistic formations construct the discourse, concerned mainly with the context in which the text was pro- duced. This analysis take place from manuals and treatises of Archival Science produced during the development of discipline and regarded as grounds for discipline. We analyzed the Manual of an Arc- hival Arrangement and Description (vor Handleiding van het ordenen in bescheijven archieven) of Muller, Feith, and Fruin (Ed.1 1898). Another work considered is the Manual of Archive Administra- tion Including the Problems of War Archives and Archive a Making (1 Ed. 1922) and some of late works of Sir Hillary Jenkinson and finally analyzed the work of Theodore R. Schellenberg some as- pects of his vast bibliography.
  • Early Modern English Palaeography 1500-1700

    Early Modern English Palaeography 1500-1700

    Early Modern English Palaeography 1500-1700 Helpful Initial Reading: • Marshall, Hilary, Palaeography for Family and Local Historians (2004, repr. 2010) o Includesa selection of MS facsimiles (including transcriptions and notes on each manuscript), plus a very helpful collection of abbreviations and letter forms. • McKerrow, Ronald B., ‘A Note on Elizabethan Handwriting’ in An Introduction to Bibliography, by McKerrow (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1927); reprinted in Gaskell's A New Introduction to Bibliography and including good specimen alphabets Literary Resources for Early Modern English Palaeography: • Index of English Literary Manuscripts. Vol.1: 1450-1625, compiled by Peter Beal, 2 vols (London: Mansel, 1980) • Index of English Literary Manuscripts. Vol.2: 1625-1700, compiled by Peter Beal, 2 vols (London: Mansel, 1987-1993) • Greg, W.W., English Literary Autographs, 1550-1650; part I, dramatists; part II, poets; supplement, scholars and archaeologists (Oxford, 1925-1932) • Petti, Anthony G., English Literary Hands from Chaucer to Dryden (London: E. Arnold, 1977) English Manuscript Culture: • Beal, Peter, In Praise of Scribes (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998) • Hobbs, Mary, Early Seventeenth-Century Verse Miscellany Manuscripts (Aldershot: Scholar Press, 1992) • Love, Harold, Scribal Publication in Seventeenth-Century England (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993) • Marotti, Arthur F., Manuscript, Print, and the English Renaissance Lyric (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995) • Woudhuysen, H.R., Sir Philip Sidney and the Circulation of Manuscripts, 1558-1640 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996) [esp. Part I, 'The Circulation of Manuscripts, 1558- 1640'] Online tools/resources: • EHOC: English Handwriting: An Online Course, https://www.english.cam.ac.uk/ceres/ehoc/index.html o Including practice materials, transcription tools, and extensive bibliographies.
  • Whenever There Is a Line Or Tilde Over a Vowel, It Is an Abbreviation for the Letters M Or N. in This Case, the Full Word Is Quadam

    Whenever There Is a Line Or Tilde Over a Vowel, It Is an Abbreviation for the Letters M Or N. in This Case, the Full Word Is Quadam

    Whenever there is a line or tilde over a vowel, it is an abbreviation for the letters m or n. In this case, the full word is quadam. In this instance, the line over the e represents an omission of the letter n, giving the word debent when written in full. Whenever a word in Latin had an instance of the letter i in succession, the second i was always written as a j. This applies to all words wherein ii is present and also to the Roman numeral ii, which was written as ij. Therefore, cambij = cambii, negotijs = negotiis. The e with a cedilla was an abbreviation for the letters ae. This word spelled out is quae. Following the letter q, a period or semicolon was used as an abbreviation for the letters ue. The first example reads denique, the second one is quacunque. In the seventeenth century, the letter u and v were interchangeable and not yet viewed as two distinct letters. While not universal, a general rule is that if u or v began a word, it was written as a v; if a u or v occurred in the middle or end of a word, it was written as a u. In the 17th century, a lowercase s had two forms- one long and one short. As a general rule, when a lowercase s occurred as the first letter of the word or in any other place in the word except as the final letter, it was written with a long s, which resembles the letter f.
  • Detecting Forgery: Forensic Investigation of Documents

    Detecting Forgery: Forensic Investigation of Documents

    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Legal Studies Social and Behavioral Studies 1996 Detecting Forgery: Forensic Investigation of Documents Joe Nickell University of Kentucky Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Nickell, Joe, "Detecting Forgery: Forensic Investigation of Documents" (1996). Legal Studies. 1. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_legal_studies/1 Detecting Forgery Forensic Investigation of DOCUlllen ts .~. JOE NICKELL THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF KENTUCKY Publication of this volume was made possible in part by a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities. Copyright © 1996 byThe Universiry Press of Kentucky Paperback edition 2005 The Universiry Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth, serving Bellarmine Universiry, Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky Universiry, The Filson Historical Sociery, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Sociery, Kentucky State University, Morehead State Universiry, Transylvania Universiry, University of Kentucky, Universiry of Louisville, and Western Kentucky Universiry. All rights reserved. Editorial and Sales qtJices:The Universiry Press of Kentucky 663 South Limestone Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40508-4008 www.kentuckypress.com The Library of Congress has cataloged the hardcover edition as follows: Nickell,Joe. Detecting forgery : forensic investigation of documents I Joe Nickell. p. cm. ISBN 0-8131-1953-7 (alk. paper) 1. Writing-Identification. 2. Signatures (Writing). 3.
  • Blair 2007 Archival Science Intro Milligan.Pdf (131.1

    Blair 2007 Archival Science Intro Milligan.Pdf (131.1

    Introduction The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Blair, Ann, and Jennifer Milligan. 2007. “Introduction.” Archival Science 7 (4) (December): 289–296. doi:10.1007/s10502-008-9069-7. Published Version 10.1007/s10502-008-9069-7 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:29674917 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA manuscript for Ann Blair and Jennifer Milligan, "Introduction," Archival Science 7:4 (2007), pp. 289-96. Introduction Archives -- collections of paper, books, and other substrates of information (some might say “memory”) and the institutions that house and manage these objects -- are subjects of a renewed and vital current critical historical interest. Archives, broadly conceived, have been used for the writing of history since historical writing began, and archival materials and institutions are an integral part of the making not just of history but of the modern historical profession as well. The historian’s relationship with the archive has been long and varied and described in a broad range of terms, as being as unproblematic as “bread and butter” (Giles 1996) or as driven by erotic, fetishistic desire (Smith 1998). It is fitting that historians should turn their scholarly attentions to these depositories that have been the object, if not the subject, of so much historical work.
  • The English Renaissance in Context: Looking at Older Books

    The English Renaissance in Context: Looking at Older Books

    The English Renaissance in Context: Looking at Older Books The History of the Book Books from the 16th and 17th centuries are both quite similar to and different from books today. The similarities include such things as use of the Codex format, general page layouts, use of title pages, etc. The codex book has been around for a long time. Its roots go back to the age of Cicero, though it only comes into more general use with the spread of Christianity throughout the later Roman Empire in the 4th and 5th centuries CE. Since then, the codex book has undergone a long and gradual evolution during which time the book, its properties, and characteristics became firmly embedded in Western consciousness. Roughly speaking, the general layout of the page that we use today came into existence in the 13th century, with the rise of the universities and the creation of books for study. It is possible, for example, to look at a page in a medieval manuscript and experience a general orientation to it, even if you cannot actually read the text. The evolution of the book, we emphasize, was slow. Such conventions as pagination, title pages, foot or endnotes, tables of contents, indices, et alia are by and large relatively recent additions. We take these features for granted; but prior to the age of Gutenberg, they are hard to find. University of Pennsylvania Libraries - 1 - Furness Shakespeare Collection The English Renaissance in Context: Looking at Older Books Renaissance books can certainly look very different from books today. They exhibit a variety and diversity that have long since been standardized and homogenized.