DOCSLIB.ORG

Final City of Santa Cruz Operations and Maintenance Habitat Conservation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final City of Santa Cruz Operations and Maintenance Habitat Conservation Plan FINAL CITY OF SANTA CRUZ OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN for the ISSUANCE OF AN INCIDENTAL TAKE PERMIT UNDER SECTION 10(a)(1)(B) OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Prepared for: City of Santa Cruz Prepared by: Ebbin, Moser + Skaggs LLP Hagar Environmental Science Dana Bland & Associates Entomological Consulting Services, Ltd. Kittleson Environmental Consulting Services Biotic Resources Group January 25, 2021 Photo: Laguna Creek California red-legged frog by Chris Berry Acknowledgements Many City of Santa Cruz staff, consultants, academic advisors and United States Fish and Wildlife Service staff shared in the development of this document and supporting materials over the course of over 20 years. Special gratitude should be expressed for the efforts of Sean Skaggs, Marc Ebbin, Donna Meyers, Bill Kocher, Terrill Tompkins, Rosemary Menard, Chris Coburn, Heidi Luckenbach, Mark Dettle, Siobhan O’neill, Hoi Yu, Scott Ruble, Tony Elliot, Travis Beck, Leslie Keedy, Noah Downing, Kirk Lenington, Juliana Rebagliati, Jim Keller, Matt Baldzikowski, Zeke Bean, Ryan Bassett, Kelleen Harter, Kristina Finstad, Randy Holloway, Laird Henkel, Jessica Martinez-McKinney, Jeremy Farr, Andy Werner, Dick Arnold, Jeff Hagar, Camm Swift, Sean Barry, Dana Bland, Gary Kittleson, Kathy Lyons, Jeff Smith, Jean Baldridge, Wayne Spencer, Stanley Gregory, Grey Hayes, Peter Kareiva, Alan Launer, Peter Moyle, Terry Roelofs, Douglas Smith, Bruce Goldstein, Dave Pereksta, Lena Chang, Jake Martin, Chad Mitcham and Chris Berry. The completion of this document represents a significant milestone in the course of our City’s natural resources management and would not have been reached without their contributions and patient but passionate dedication to habitat conservation planning. Executive Summary The City of Santa Cruz (City or Applicant) has applied for an incidental take permit (ITP) from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) to incidentally take the federally endangered Ohlone tiger beetle (Cicindela ohlone); the federally endangered Mount Hermon June beetle (Polyphylla barbata); the federally endangered tidewater goby (Eucyclogobius newberryi); the Pacific lamprey (Lampetra tridentata)(a species not currently listed under the ESA); the federally threatened California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii); and the western pond turtle (Actinemys marmorata), a federal species of concern. Additionally, the City is proposing to include four plant species in the Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP or Plan) and permit because of the benefits provided to such species as a result of the Plan’s conservation strategy and to receive the “No Surprises” regulatory assurances. The four plant species are the federally endangered Ben Lomond spineflower (Chorizanthe pungens var. hartwegiana); the federally endangered Robust spineflower (Chorizanthe robusta var. robusta); the federally threatened Santa Cruz tarplant (Holocarpha macradenia); and the State endangered San Francisco popcornflower (Plagiobothrys diffuses). The Plan refers to the plant and wildlife species proposed for coverage under the plan as Covered Species. Any reference in this Plan to incidental take of Covered Species under the Plan shall, for the purpose of covered plant species, refer to loss or impacts to covered plant species identified in the Permit. The potential taking of the covered wildlife species would occur as a result of activities permitted under the ITP (Covered Activities) and described in the Plan and include operation, maintenance and rehabilitation of the City’s water supply and water system facilities; operation and maintenance of the City’s municipal facilities; and management of City lands. The area covered by the HCP (Plan Area) is located in Santa Cruz County on the Central Coast of California, approximately 70 miles south of San Francisco. The total watershed and water service/urban areas comprising the general Plan Area are approximately 176 square miles and include three geographically distinct areas: the North Coast watersheds, the San Lorenzo River watershed, and the Santa Cruz urban center. The Plan discusses in detail the impacts to Covered Species and their habitats that are expected as a result of Covered Activities. As a result of these anticipated impacts, the Applicant has applied for a section 10(a)(1)(B) incidental take permit and proposes to implement the HCP as described herein, which provides measures for minimizing and mitigating adverse effects on the Covered Species. The Applicant requests that the permit be issued for a period of 30 years. The HCP summarizes the Covered Activities and identifies the responsibilities of the City and the role of the Service under the Plan. The HCP describes measures that will be implemented by the Applicant to minimize and mitigate impacts of the project on the Covered Species and their habitats and to further the conservation of these species. The conservation strategy in the Plan includes measures to mitigate impacts to Covered Species and their habitats that are not avoided - i - through minimization measures. The City commits to fully fund the Plan and the Plan includes descriptions of costs for implementing the Plan and sources of funding to cover those costs. -ii- Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... i Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. iii List of Tables and Figures .............................................................................................. vii List of Appendices ........................................................................................................... vii 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose and Background ................................................................................. 1 1.2 Plan Area ........................................................................................................... 1 1.3 HCP Planning Process ...................................................................................... 4 1.4 Regulatory Framework .................................................................................... 4 1.4.1 Endangered Species Act ............................................................................... 4 1.4.2 National Environmental Policy Act ............................................................. 5 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ......................................................................... 6 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Climate ............................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Geology............................................................................................................... 6 2.3.1 North Coast Unit ........................................................................................... 7 2.3.2 San Lorenzo River Watershed Unit ............................................................ 7 2.3.3 City Urban Center Unit ................................................................................ 8 2.4 Soils..................................................................................................................... 9 2.4.1 Ben Lomond-Felton-Lompico Soils ............................................................. 9 2.4.2 Aptos-Los Osos-Fagan Soils ......................................................................... 9 2.4.3 Watsonville-Elkhorn-Pinto Soils ............................................................... 10 2.4.4 Zayante Soils................................................................................................ 10 2.5 Hydrology ........................................................................................................ 10 2.5.1 North Coast Unit ......................................................................................... 10 2.6 Terrestrial Habitat Types............................................................................... 14 2.6.1 North Coast Unit, San Lorenzo River Watershed Unit and Urban City Center Unit ....................................................................................................................... 14 2.7 Covered Species ............................................................................................... 19 2.7.1 Ben Lomond Spineflower (Chorizanthe pungens var. hartwegiana) ...... 19 2.7.2 Robust Spineflower (Chorizanthe robusta var. robusta) .......................... 20 2.7.3 Santa Cruz Tarplant (Holocarpha macradenia) ....................................... 22 2.7.4 San Francisco Popcornflower (Plagiobothrys diffusus) ........................... 24 2.7.5 Ohlone Tiger Beetle (Cicindela ohlone) ..................................................... 25 2.7.6 Mount Hermon June Beetle (Polyphylla barbata) .................................... 27 2.7.7 Tidewater Goby (Eucyclogobius newberryi) ............................................. 29 2.7.8 Pacific Lamprey (Lampetra tridentata) ...................................................... 32 2.7.9 California Red-legged Frog (Rana draytonii) ........................................... 34 2.7.10
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 42 / Friday, March 1, 1996 / Proposed
    8014 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 42 / Friday, March 1, 1996 / Proposed Rules under CERCLA are appropriate at this FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: is currently known only from Santa time. Consequently, U.S EPA proposed Leslie K. Shapiro, Mass Media Bureau, Cruz County, California. The five known to delete the site from the NPL. (202) 418±2180. populations may be threatened by the EPA, with concurrence from the State SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a following factors: habitat fragmentation of Minnesota, has determined that all synopsis of the Commission's Notice of and destruction due to urban appropriate Fund-financed responses Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. development, habitat degradation due to under CERCLA at the Kummer Sanitary 96±19, adopted February 6, 1996, and invasion of non-native vegetation, and Landfill Superfund Site have been released February 20, 1996. The full text vulnerability to stochastic local completed, and no further CERCLA of this Commission decision is available extirpations. However, the Service finds response is appropriate in order to for inspection and copying during that the information presented in the provide protection of human health and normal business hours in the FCC petition, in addition to information in the environment. Therefore, EPA Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M the Service's files, does not provide proposes to delete the site from the NPL. Street, NW., Washington, DC. The conclusive data on biological vulnerability and threats to the species Dated: February 20, 1996. complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's and/or its habitat. Available information Valdas V.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Endangered Status for the Ohlone Tiger Beetle
    6952 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 29 / Friday, February 11, 2000 / Proposed Rules For further information, please confirmation from the system that we oviposition (egg laying) (Pearson 1988). contact: Chris Murphy, Satellite Policy have received your e-mail message, It is not known at this time how many Branch, (202) 418±2373, or Howard contact us directly by calling our eggs the Ohlone tiger beetle female lays, Griboff, Satellite Policy Branch, at (202) Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office at but other species of Cicindela are 418±0657. phone number 805/644±1766. known to lay between 1 and 14 eggs per (3) You may hand-deliver comments female (mean range 3.7 to 7.7), List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 25 to our Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, depending on the species (Kaulbars and Satellites. 2493 Portola Road, Suite B, Ventura, Freitag 1993). After the larva emerges Federal Communications Commission. California 93003. from the egg and becomes hardened, it Anna M. Gomez, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: enlarges the chamber that contained the Deputy Chief, International Bureau. Colleen Sculley, invertebrate biologist, egg into a tunnel (Pearson 1988). Before pupation (transformation process from [FR Doc. 00±3332 Filed 2±10±00; 8:45 am] Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, at the larva to adult), the third instar larva will BILLING CODE 6712±01±P above address (telephone 805/644±1766; facsimile 805/644±3958). plug the burrow entrance and dig a SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: chamber for pupation. After pupation, the adult tiger beetle will dig out of the DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Background soil and emerge.
    [Show full text]
  • LITERATURE CITED 90-Day and 12-Month
    LITERATURE CITED 90-Day and 12-Month Findings on a Petition to List the Miami Tiger Beetle as an Endangered or Threatened Species; Proposed Endangered Species Status for the Miami Tiger Beetle Docket no.: FWS-R4-ES-2015-0164 Alexander, T.R. 1953. Plant succession of Key Largo, Florida involving Pinus caribaea and Quercus virginiana. Quarterly Journal of Florida Academy of Sciences 16:133–138. Alexander, T.R. 1967. A tropical hammock on the Miami (Florida) limestone—a twenty-five- year study. Ecology 48(5):863-867. Bargar, T.A. 2012. FL – Cholinesterase inhibition in butterflies following aerial broadcast of naled on the National Key Deer Refuge. Interim report to submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Big Pine Key, Florida. Southeast Ecological Science Center, United States Geological Service, Gainesville, Florida. Bartlett, S.N., M.M. McDonough, L.K. Ammerman. 2013. Molecular systematics of bonneted bats (Molossidae: Eumops) based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Journal of Mammalogy 94(4):867–880. Beaumont, L., A. Pitman, S. Perkins, N. Zimmermann, N. Yoccoz, and W. Thuiller. 2011. Impacts of climate change on the world’s most exceptional ecoregions. PNAS 108(6): 2306–2311. Berg, M., E. Kiers, G. Driessen, M. van der Heijden, B. Kooi, F. Kuenen, M. Liefting, H. Verhoef, and J. Ellers. 2009. Adapt or disperse: understanding species persistence in a changing world. Glob. Chg. Biol. doi: 10.1111/j.1365–2486.2009.02014x. Bousquet, Y. 2012. Catalogue of Geadephaga (Coleoptera, Adephaga) of America, north of Mexico. ZooKeys 245:1-1722. Bradley, K.A. and G.D. Gann.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Management Plan for the Siuslaw Hairy-Necked Tiger Beetle
    SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE SIUSLAW HAIRY-NECKED TIGER BEETLE (CICINDELA HIRTICOLLIS SIUSLAWENSIS GRAVES, KREJCI, AND GRAVES, 1988) ON NEW RIVER ACEC, COOS BAY BLM, OREGON Photo by Candace Fallon / The Xerces Society. Developed by Candace Fallon and Sarina Jepsen of The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation SEPTEMBER 2015 U.S.D.A. FOREST SERVICE REGION 6 AND U.S.D.I. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT INTERAGENCY SPECIAL STATUS AND SENSITIVE SPECIES PROGRAM CONTENTS Goal of the Management Plan ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Section I: Status and Threats ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Conservation Status ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Taxonomy .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Species Range, Distribution, Abundance, and Trends ............................................................................................... 4 Species Life History .................................................................................................................................................... 7 New River ACEC Site Description ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Guide for California Oatgrass
    Plant Guide moist lowland prairies as well as open woodlands. CALIFORNIA Therefore, it is commonly recommended for revegetation, wildlife plantings, and restoration of OATGRASS oak savannas, transitional wetlands, and grasslands, especially in the Pacific Coast states where it is most Danthonia californica common. Bolander Plant Symbol = DACA3 Native bunchgrasses like California oatgrass are valuable for enhancing biodiversity. Healthy stands Contributed by: NRCS Plant Materials Center, can reduce invasion by exotic species yet exhibit a Corvallis, Oregon spatial distribution compatible with forbs (Maslovat 2001). Combined with other native grasses and forbs, California oatgrass improves habitat diversity for feeding, nesting, and hiding by songbirds (Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 2000), as well as other animals. The grains are eaten by small birds and mammals (Mohlenbrock 1992). Prairies with California oatgrass as a definitive species are also unique refuges for other endemic organisms. For example, the Ohlone tiger beetle (Cicindela ohlone) is an endangered (federally listed) predatory insect known only to five remnant stands of California native grassland in Santa Cruz County (Santa Cruz Public Libraries 2003). These rare grasslands, including the coastal terrace prairies, remain biodiversity “hotspots” and are considered in need of protection (Stromberg et al. 2001). Forage: As a rangeland plant, California oatgrass is well utilized by livestock and certain wildlife. Prior to maturity, the species is rated as good to very good forage for cattle and horses in the Pacific Coast states, but less palatable for sheep and goats. Ratings are lower for eastern, drier portions of its natural range (USDA Forest Service 1988). Others claim it is palatable to all classes of livestock and a mainstay grass for range grazing in places like Humboldt County, California (Cooper 1960).
    [Show full text]
  • UC Santa Cruz Campus Grasslands Management Guidelines & Protection Prioritization Recommendations
    UC Santa Cruz Campus Grasslands Management Guidelines & Protection Prioritization Recommendations Justin Luong, M.A. [email protected] Advised by: Dr. Karen Holl [email protected] June 25, 2020 Executive Summary UC Santa Cruz has unique grasslands that support high plant diversity and endangered species and are highly valued by campus communities. California’s climate is dynamic and plant communities respond accordingly. As such, grassland managers should seek to adaptively manage meadows depending on annual weather patterns. Managers should also consider which management practices may be most suitable to different grasslands depending on varying cover of different plant lifeforms or sensitive species. Adaptive management prescriptions have been provided to promote both native plant diversity and cover and Ohlone Tiger Beetle habitat suitability, under varying rainfall patterns. UC Santa Cruz should invest more into campus stewardship and create an ecological restoration unit which will further improve campus sustainability goals and decrease natural resource management and mitigation costs for future expansion of the developed campus. Future increased enrollment goals of the University of California Office of the President will require additional student housing and support buildings, which in turn may require compensatory mitigation and protection in areas with sensitive habitat types or listed species. Several areas, especially Marshall Fields, Mima Meadow and Great Meadow, have been indicated as important areas for protection in this plan. This project and document were developed from funding support from the 2019-2020 Chancellor’s Graduate Internship Program at University of California, Santa Cruz. 1 Luong UC Santa Cruz Campus Grassland Management Plan UC Santa Cruz Sustainability, Enrollment and Long-Range Development Goals The University of California is committed to increasing enrollment at all campuses in order to meet rising demands for higher education in California (University of California 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Management Review, Ohlone Tiger Beetle
    Review of Historical and Current Land Use Practices, Characterization of Suitable Habitat, and Habitat Management Recommendations for the Endangered Ohlone Tiger Beetle, Cicindela ohlone (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) Review of Historical and Current Land Use Practices, Characterization of Suitable Habitat, and Habitat Management Recommendations for the Endangered Ohlone Tiger Beetle, Cicindela ohlone (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) Prepared for: Ventura Fish & Wildlife Office U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2493 Portola Road, Suite B Ventura, CA 93003-2922 Prepared by: Richard A. Arnold, PhD Entomological Consulting Services, Ltd. 104 Mountain View Court Pleasant Hill, CA 94523-2188 James W. Bartolome, PhD, CRM Dept. of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management 321 Hilgard Hall University of California Berkeley, CA 94720-3114 and Lawrence D. Ford, PhD, CRM and Devii R. Rao, MS LD Ford Rangeland Conservation Science 5984 Plateau Drive Felton, CA 95018-9253 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Project #11130000 Revised Final Report: March 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS.....................................................................................................i LIST OF TABLES..............................................................................................................ii LIST OF FIGURES.............................................................................................................ii INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………...1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE OTB ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 29/Friday, February 11, 2000
    6952 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 29 / Friday, February 11, 2000 / Proposed Rules For further information, please confirmation from the system that we oviposition (egg laying) (Pearson 1988). contact: Chris Murphy, Satellite Policy have received your e-mail message, It is not known at this time how many Branch, (202) 418±2373, or Howard contact us directly by calling our eggs the Ohlone tiger beetle female lays, Griboff, Satellite Policy Branch, at (202) Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office at but other species of Cicindela are 418±0657. phone number 805/644±1766. known to lay between 1 and 14 eggs per (3) You may hand-deliver comments female (mean range 3.7 to 7.7), List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 25 to our Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, depending on the species (Kaulbars and Satellites. 2493 Portola Road, Suite B, Ventura, Freitag 1993). After the larva emerges Federal Communications Commission. California 93003. from the egg and becomes hardened, it Anna M. Gomez, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: enlarges the chamber that contained the Deputy Chief, International Bureau. Colleen Sculley, invertebrate biologist, egg into a tunnel (Pearson 1988). Before pupation (transformation process from [FR Doc. 00±3332 Filed 2±10±00; 8:45 am] Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, at the larva to adult), the third instar larva will BILLING CODE 6712±01±P above address (telephone 805/644±1766; facsimile 805/644±3958). plug the burrow entrance and dig a SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: chamber for pupation. After pupation, the adult tiger beetle will dig out of the DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Background soil and emerge.
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence Report California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Natural Diversity Database
    Occurrence Report California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Natural Diversity Database Map Index Number: 34038 EO Index: 12605 Key Quad: Merritt (3812157) Element Code: AAAAA01180 Occurrence Number: 384 Occurrence Last Updated: 1996-07-09 Scientific Name: Ambystoma californiense Common Name: California tiger salamander Listing Status: Federal: Threatened Rare Plant Rank: State: Threatened Other Lists: CDFW_SSC-Species of Special Concern IUCN_VU-Vulnerable CNDDB Element Ranks: Global: G2G3 State: S2S3 General Habitat: Micro Habitat: CENTRAL VALLEY DPS FEDERALLY LISTED AS THREATENED. SANTA NEED UNDERGROUND REFUGES, ESPECIALLY GROUND SQUIRREL BARBARA & SONOMA COUNTIES DPS FEDERALLY LISTED AS BURROWS, & VERNAL POOLS OR OTHER SEASONAL WATER ENDANGERED. SOURCES FOR BREEDING. Last Date Observed: 1993-01-31 Occurrence Type: Natural/Native occurrence Last Survey Date: 1993-01-31 Occurrence Rank: Unknown Owner/Manager: PVT Trend: Unknown Presence: Presumed Extant Location: SOUTH WEST CORNER OF COVELL BLVD AND LAKE BLVD, IN THE CITY OF DAVIS. Detailed Location: FOUND IN THE PARKING LOT AT THE WILLOWS APARTMENTS. Ecological: Threats: URBAN DEVELOPMENT, AGRICULTURAL FIELDS AND TWO VERY BUSY ROADS. General: APARTMENT COMPLEX PARKING LOT LOCATED ACROSS LAKE BLVD FROM "WET POND" A CITY OWNED WILDLIFE HABITAT AREA MANAGED BY THE YOLO AUDUBON SOCIETY. PLSS: T08N, R02E, Sec. 07 (M) Accuracy: 80 meters Area (acres): 0 UTM: Zone-10 N4268740 E605722 Latitude/Longitude: 38.56082 / -121.78655 Elevation (feet): 50 County Summary: Quad Summary: Yolo
    [Show full text]
  • Ohlone Tiger Beetle (Cicindela Ohlone) 5-Year Review: Summary
    Ohlone tiger beetle (Cicindela ohlone) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photograph by Richard A. Arnold U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office Ventura, California November 2009 5-YEAR REVIEW Ohlone tiger beetle (Cicindela ohlone) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing of a species as endangered or threatened is based on the existence of threats attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of a species. In the 5-year review, we consider the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, and focus on new information available since the species was listed or last reviewed. If we recommend a change in listing status based on the results of the 5-year review, we must propose to do so through a separate rule-making process defined in the Act that includes public review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • California Terrestrial and Vernal Pool Invertebrates of Conservation Priority1
    California Terrestrial and Vernal Pool Invertebrates of Conservation Priority1 Species Federal ESA CA ESA G-Rank S-Rank Other Statuses GASTROPODA (Snails and slugs) Ammonitella yatesii None None G1 S1 IUCN - Vulnerable tight coin (=Yates' snail) Ancotrema voyanum None None G1G2 S1S2 BLM-Sensitive hooded lancetooth Assiminea infima None None G1 S1 IUCN - Vulnerable Badwater snail Binneya notabilis None None G1 S1 IUCN - Data Deficient Santa Barbara shelled slug Eremarionta immaculata None None G1 S1 IUCN - Vulnerable white desertsnail Eremarionta millepalmarum None None G1 S1 IUCN - Vulnerable Thousand Palms desertsnail Eremarionta morongoana IUCN - Near None None G1G3 S1 Morongo (=Colorado) desertsnail Threatened Eremarionta rowelli bakerensis None None G3G4T1 S1 IUCN - Data Deficient Baker's desertsnail Eremarionta rowelli mccoiana None None G3G4T1 S1 IUCN - Data Deficient California Mccoy snail Haplotrema catalinense None None G1 S1 Santa Catalina lancetooth Haplotrema duranti None None G1G2 S1S2 ribbed lancetooth Helminthoglypta allynsmithi None None G1 S1 IUCN - Vulnerable Merced Canyon shoulderband Helminthoglypta arrosa monticola None None G2G3T1 S1 mountain shoulderband Helminthoglypta arrosa pomoensis None None G2G3T1 S1 IUCN - Data Deficient Pomo bronze shoulderband Helminthoglypta ayresiana sanctaecrucis None None G1G2T1T2 S1S2 Ayer's snail Helminthoglypta callistoderma None None G1 S1 IUCN - Endangered Kern shoulderband 1 This list pertains to Scientific Collecting Permit regulations (Title 14, Section 650, California Code of Regulations). The species on this list include vernal pool, terrestrial, and aquatic invertebrates with a terrestrial phase that are listed under the Federal and California Endangered Species Acts, or have a NatureServe rank of G1, G1G2, S1, S1S2, SH or SX. For a full list of invertebrates of conservation concern, see the California Natural Diversity Database Special Animals List: https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Plants-and-Animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Conservation of Cicindela Ohlone Freitag and Kavanaugh, the Endangered Ohlone Tiger Beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Cicindelinae)
    Biology and Conservation of Cicindela ohlone Freitag and Kavanaugh, the Endangered Ohlone Tiger Beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Cicindelinae). I. Distribution and Natural History Author(s): C. Barry Knisley and Richard A. Arnold Source: The Coleopterists Bulletin, 67(4):569-580. 2013. Published By: The Coleopterists Society DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/0010-065X-67.4.569 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1649/0010-065X-67.4.569 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/ terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 67(4): 569–580. 2013. BIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION OF CICINDELA OHLONE FREITAG AND KAVANAUGH, THE ENDANGERED OHLONE TIGER BEETLE (COLEOPTERA:CARABIDAE: CICINDELINAE). I. DISTRIBUTION AND NATURAL HISTORY C. BARRY KNISLEY 1510 Beaverdam Creek Road Crozier, VA 23039, U.S.A. [email protected] AND RICHARD A. ARNOLD Entomological Consulting Services, Ltd., 104 Mountain View Court Pleasant Hill, CA 94523-2188, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]