Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 29/Friday, February 11, 2000

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 29/Friday, February 11, 2000 6952 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 29 / Friday, February 11, 2000 / Proposed Rules For further information, please confirmation from the system that we oviposition (egg laying) (Pearson 1988). contact: Chris Murphy, Satellite Policy have received your e-mail message, It is not known at this time how many Branch, (202) 418±2373, or Howard contact us directly by calling our eggs the Ohlone tiger beetle female lays, Griboff, Satellite Policy Branch, at (202) Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office at but other species of Cicindela are 418±0657. phone number 805/644±1766. known to lay between 1 and 14 eggs per (3) You may hand-deliver comments female (mean range 3.7 to 7.7), List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 25 to our Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, depending on the species (Kaulbars and Satellites. 2493 Portola Road, Suite B, Ventura, Freitag 1993). After the larva emerges Federal Communications Commission. California 93003. from the egg and becomes hardened, it Anna M. Gomez, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: enlarges the chamber that contained the Deputy Chief, International Bureau. Colleen Sculley, invertebrate biologist, egg into a tunnel (Pearson 1988). Before pupation (transformation process from [FR Doc. 00±3332 Filed 2±10±00; 8:45 am] Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, at the larva to adult), the third instar larva will BILLING CODE 6712±01±P above address (telephone 805/644±1766; facsimile 805/644±3958). plug the burrow entrance and dig a SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: chamber for pupation. After pupation, the adult tiger beetle will dig out of the DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Background soil and emerge. Reproduction may Fish and Wildlife Service The Ohlone tiger beetle (Cicindela either begin soon after emergence or be ohlone) is a member of the Coleopteran delayed (Pearson 1988). 50 CFR Part 17 family Cicindelidae (tiger beetles), Tiger beetles are a well-studied which includes over 2,000 species taxonomic group with a large body of RIN 1018±AF89 worldwide and over 100 species in the scientific literature; the journal United States (Pearson and Cassola Cicindela is devoted exclusively to tiger Endangered and Threatened Wildlife beetles. Scientists have studied the and Plants; Proposed Endangered 1992). Tiger beetles are day-active, predatory insects that prey on small diversity and ecological specialization Status for the Ohlone Tiger Beetle of tiger beetles, and amateur collectors (Cicindela ohlone) arthropods. Because many tiger beetles often feed on insect species that are have long been attracted by their bright AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, injurious to man and crops, they are coloration and swift movements. Tiger Interior. regarded as beneficial (Pearson and beetle species occur in many different ACTION: Proposed rule. Cassola 1992; Nagano 1982). Adult tiger habitats including riparian habitats, beetles are medium-sized, elongate beaches, dunes, woodlands, grasslands, SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and beetles characterized by their usually and other open areas (Pearson 1988; Wildlife Service (Service), propose brilliant metallic green, blue, red, and Knisley and Hill 1992). A common endangered status pursuant to the yellow coloration highlighted by stripes habitat component appears to be open Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, and spots. Adults are ferocious, swift, sunny areas for hunting and as amended, for the Ohlone tiger beetle and agile predators that seize small prey thermoregulation (an adaptive behavior (Cicindela ohlone). This species is with powerful sickle-shaped jaws. to use sunlight or shade to regulate body endemic to Santa Cruz County, Tiger beetle larvae are also predatory. temperature) (Knisley et al. 1990; California, and is threatened by habitat They live in small vertical or slanting Knisley and Hill 1992). Individual fragmentation and destruction due to burrows from which they lunge and species of tiger beetle are generally urban development, habitat degradation seize passing invertebrate prey (Essig highly habitat-specific because of due to invasion of nonnative vegetation, 1926; Essig 1942; Pearson 1988). When oviposition and larval sensitivity to soil and vulnerability to local extirpations a prey item passes near a burrow, the moisture, composition, and temperature from random natural events. This larva grasps the prey with its strong (Pearson 1988; Pearson and Cassola proposal, if made final, would extend mandibles (mouthparts) and pulls it into 1992; Kaulbars and Freitag 1993). the Federal protection and recovery the burrow, and once inside the burrow, The Ohlone tiger beetle is endemic to provisions of the Act to this species. the larva will feed on the captured prey Santa Cruz County, California, where it DATES: Comments from all interested (Essig 1942; Pearson 1988). Tiger beetles is known only from coastal terraces parties received by April 11, 2000 will share similar larval body forms supporting remnant patches of native be considered. Public hearing requests throughout the world (Pearson and grassland habitat. Specimens of this must be received by March 27, 2000. Cassola 1992). The larvae, either white, species were first collected northwest of ADDRESSES: If you wish to comment, yellowish, or dusky in coloration, are the City of Santa Cruz, California, in you may submit your comments and grub-like and fossorial (subterranean), 1987, and were first described in 1993 materials concerning this proposal by with a hook-like appendage on the fifth (Freitag et al. 1993). Both male and any one of several methods. abdominal segment that anchors the female specimens have been collected. (1) You may submit written comments larvae inside their burrows. The adult Ohlone tiger beetle is a to the Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Tiger beetle larvae undergo three relatively small beetle measuring 9.5 to Wildlife Service, Ventura Fish and instars (larval development stages). This 12.5 millimeters (mm) (0.37 to 0.49 Wildlife Office, 2493 Portola Road, period can take 1 to 4 years, but a 2-year inches (in)) long. The adults have large, Suite B, Ventura, California 93003. period is the most common (Pearson prominent eyes and metallic green (2) You may send comments by e-mail 1988). After mating, the tiger beetle elytra (leathery forewings) with small to [email protected]. Please female excavates a hole in the soil and light spots (Freitag et al. 1993). Their submit these comments as an ASCII file oviposits (lays) a single egg (Pearson legs are long, slender, and coppery- and avoid the use of special characters 1988; Kaulbars and Freitag 1993; Grey green. Freitag et al. (1993) describe and any form of encryption. Please also Hayes, University of California, Santa features that distinguish this species include ``Attn: [RIN 1018±AF89]'' and Cruz, pers. comm. 1998). Females of from closely related species of Cicindela your name and return address in your many species of Cicindela are extremely purpurea and other purpurea group e-mail message. If you do not receive a specific in choice of soil type for taxa. VerDate 27<JAN>2000 16:06 Feb 10, 2000 Jkt 190000 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\11FEP1.SGM pfrm08 PsN: 11FEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 29 / Friday, February 11, 2000 / Proposed Rules 6953 Two principal distinguishing features Adult Ohlone tiger beetles have been entomologists commonly collect out of of the Ohlone tiger beetle are its early observed in remnant patches of native season and out of known ranges in order seasonal adult activity period and its grassland on coastal terraces where bare to find temporally and spatially outlying disjunct distribution. While other tiger areas occur among low or sparse specimens, one would expect more beetle species, such as Cicindela vegetation. Trails (e.g., foot paths, dirt specimens to have been collected if the purpurea, are active during spring, roads, and bicycle paths) are also used. Ohlone tiger beetle were more summer, or early fall (Nagano 1982; When disturbed, adults will fly to more widespread and common. Freitag et al. 1993), the Ohlone tiger densely vegetated areas (Freitag et al. Only five populations of Ohlone tiger beetle is active from late January to early 1993; Richard Arnold, private beetles are known to exist. All known April (Freitag et al. 1993). The Ohlone consultant, pers. comm. 1995). populations are located on coastal tiger beetle is the southernmost of Oviposition by females and subsequent terraces supporting remnant stands of purpurea group species in the Pacific larval development also occur in this native grassland. One population occurs coast region; its distribution is allopatric coastal prairie habitat (i.e., open areas northwest of the City of Soquel at 60 to (geographically separated) to those of among native vegetation) (D. 90 meters (m) (200 to 295 feet (ft)) similar species (Freitag et al. 1993). Kavanaugh, pers. comm. 1997; V. elevation. A second population is Ohlone tiger beetle larvae are Cheap, in litt. 1997). The density of located in the City of Scotts Valley at currently undescribed. However, tiger larval burrows decreases with 210 m (690 ft) elevation; a third is beetle burrows, measuring 4 to 6 mm in increasing vegetation cover (G. Hayes, in located west of the City of Santa Cruz diameter (0.16 to 0.23 in), were found in litt. 1997). at 110 m (360 ft) elevation on property the same habitat areas where adult The historic range of the Ohlone tiger owned by the County of Santa Cruz; a Ohlone tiger beetles were collected beetle cannot be precisely assessed fourth population is found in a preserve (David Kavanaugh, California Academy because the species was only recently northwest of the City of Santa Cruz and of Sciences, pers. comm. 1997; V. discovered, and no historic specimens owned by the City and occurs at about Cheap, in litt. 1997). The surface or records are available. The earliest 110 m (360 ft) elevation; and the fifth openings of these burrows are circular specimen recorded was collected from a population is found northwest of the and flat with no dirt piles or mounds site northwest of the City of Santa Cruz City of Santa Cruz on properties owned surrounding the circumference (Kim in 1987 (Freitag et al.
Recommended publications
  • Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 42 / Friday, March 1, 1996 / Proposed
    8014 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 42 / Friday, March 1, 1996 / Proposed Rules under CERCLA are appropriate at this FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: is currently known only from Santa time. Consequently, U.S EPA proposed Leslie K. Shapiro, Mass Media Bureau, Cruz County, California. The five known to delete the site from the NPL. (202) 418±2180. populations may be threatened by the EPA, with concurrence from the State SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a following factors: habitat fragmentation of Minnesota, has determined that all synopsis of the Commission's Notice of and destruction due to urban appropriate Fund-financed responses Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. development, habitat degradation due to under CERCLA at the Kummer Sanitary 96±19, adopted February 6, 1996, and invasion of non-native vegetation, and Landfill Superfund Site have been released February 20, 1996. The full text vulnerability to stochastic local completed, and no further CERCLA of this Commission decision is available extirpations. However, the Service finds response is appropriate in order to for inspection and copying during that the information presented in the provide protection of human health and normal business hours in the FCC petition, in addition to information in the environment. Therefore, EPA Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M the Service's files, does not provide proposes to delete the site from the NPL. Street, NW., Washington, DC. The conclusive data on biological vulnerability and threats to the species Dated: February 20, 1996. complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's and/or its habitat. Available information Valdas V.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Endangered Status for the Ohlone Tiger Beetle
    6952 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 29 / Friday, February 11, 2000 / Proposed Rules For further information, please confirmation from the system that we oviposition (egg laying) (Pearson 1988). contact: Chris Murphy, Satellite Policy have received your e-mail message, It is not known at this time how many Branch, (202) 418±2373, or Howard contact us directly by calling our eggs the Ohlone tiger beetle female lays, Griboff, Satellite Policy Branch, at (202) Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office at but other species of Cicindela are 418±0657. phone number 805/644±1766. known to lay between 1 and 14 eggs per (3) You may hand-deliver comments female (mean range 3.7 to 7.7), List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 25 to our Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, depending on the species (Kaulbars and Satellites. 2493 Portola Road, Suite B, Ventura, Freitag 1993). After the larva emerges Federal Communications Commission. California 93003. from the egg and becomes hardened, it Anna M. Gomez, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: enlarges the chamber that contained the Deputy Chief, International Bureau. Colleen Sculley, invertebrate biologist, egg into a tunnel (Pearson 1988). Before pupation (transformation process from [FR Doc. 00±3332 Filed 2±10±00; 8:45 am] Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, at the larva to adult), the third instar larva will BILLING CODE 6712±01±P above address (telephone 805/644±1766; facsimile 805/644±3958). plug the burrow entrance and dig a SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: chamber for pupation. After pupation, the adult tiger beetle will dig out of the DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Background soil and emerge.
    [Show full text]
  • LITERATURE CITED 90-Day and 12-Month
    LITERATURE CITED 90-Day and 12-Month Findings on a Petition to List the Miami Tiger Beetle as an Endangered or Threatened Species; Proposed Endangered Species Status for the Miami Tiger Beetle Docket no.: FWS-R4-ES-2015-0164 Alexander, T.R. 1953. Plant succession of Key Largo, Florida involving Pinus caribaea and Quercus virginiana. Quarterly Journal of Florida Academy of Sciences 16:133–138. Alexander, T.R. 1967. A tropical hammock on the Miami (Florida) limestone—a twenty-five- year study. Ecology 48(5):863-867. Bargar, T.A. 2012. FL – Cholinesterase inhibition in butterflies following aerial broadcast of naled on the National Key Deer Refuge. Interim report to submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Big Pine Key, Florida. Southeast Ecological Science Center, United States Geological Service, Gainesville, Florida. Bartlett, S.N., M.M. McDonough, L.K. Ammerman. 2013. Molecular systematics of bonneted bats (Molossidae: Eumops) based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Journal of Mammalogy 94(4):867–880. Beaumont, L., A. Pitman, S. Perkins, N. Zimmermann, N. Yoccoz, and W. Thuiller. 2011. Impacts of climate change on the world’s most exceptional ecoregions. PNAS 108(6): 2306–2311. Berg, M., E. Kiers, G. Driessen, M. van der Heijden, B. Kooi, F. Kuenen, M. Liefting, H. Verhoef, and J. Ellers. 2009. Adapt or disperse: understanding species persistence in a changing world. Glob. Chg. Biol. doi: 10.1111/j.1365–2486.2009.02014x. Bousquet, Y. 2012. Catalogue of Geadephaga (Coleoptera, Adephaga) of America, north of Mexico. ZooKeys 245:1-1722. Bradley, K.A. and G.D. Gann.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Management Plan for the Siuslaw Hairy-Necked Tiger Beetle
    SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE SIUSLAW HAIRY-NECKED TIGER BEETLE (CICINDELA HIRTICOLLIS SIUSLAWENSIS GRAVES, KREJCI, AND GRAVES, 1988) ON NEW RIVER ACEC, COOS BAY BLM, OREGON Photo by Candace Fallon / The Xerces Society. Developed by Candace Fallon and Sarina Jepsen of The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation SEPTEMBER 2015 U.S.D.A. FOREST SERVICE REGION 6 AND U.S.D.I. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT INTERAGENCY SPECIAL STATUS AND SENSITIVE SPECIES PROGRAM CONTENTS Goal of the Management Plan ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Section I: Status and Threats ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Conservation Status ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Taxonomy .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Species Range, Distribution, Abundance, and Trends ............................................................................................... 4 Species Life History .................................................................................................................................................... 7 New River ACEC Site Description ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Guide for California Oatgrass
    Plant Guide moist lowland prairies as well as open woodlands. CALIFORNIA Therefore, it is commonly recommended for revegetation, wildlife plantings, and restoration of OATGRASS oak savannas, transitional wetlands, and grasslands, especially in the Pacific Coast states where it is most Danthonia californica common. Bolander Plant Symbol = DACA3 Native bunchgrasses like California oatgrass are valuable for enhancing biodiversity. Healthy stands Contributed by: NRCS Plant Materials Center, can reduce invasion by exotic species yet exhibit a Corvallis, Oregon spatial distribution compatible with forbs (Maslovat 2001). Combined with other native grasses and forbs, California oatgrass improves habitat diversity for feeding, nesting, and hiding by songbirds (Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 2000), as well as other animals. The grains are eaten by small birds and mammals (Mohlenbrock 1992). Prairies with California oatgrass as a definitive species are also unique refuges for other endemic organisms. For example, the Ohlone tiger beetle (Cicindela ohlone) is an endangered (federally listed) predatory insect known only to five remnant stands of California native grassland in Santa Cruz County (Santa Cruz Public Libraries 2003). These rare grasslands, including the coastal terrace prairies, remain biodiversity “hotspots” and are considered in need of protection (Stromberg et al. 2001). Forage: As a rangeland plant, California oatgrass is well utilized by livestock and certain wildlife. Prior to maturity, the species is rated as good to very good forage for cattle and horses in the Pacific Coast states, but less palatable for sheep and goats. Ratings are lower for eastern, drier portions of its natural range (USDA Forest Service 1988). Others claim it is palatable to all classes of livestock and a mainstay grass for range grazing in places like Humboldt County, California (Cooper 1960).
    [Show full text]
  • UC Santa Cruz Campus Grasslands Management Guidelines & Protection Prioritization Recommendations
    UC Santa Cruz Campus Grasslands Management Guidelines & Protection Prioritization Recommendations Justin Luong, M.A. [email protected] Advised by: Dr. Karen Holl [email protected] June 25, 2020 Executive Summary UC Santa Cruz has unique grasslands that support high plant diversity and endangered species and are highly valued by campus communities. California’s climate is dynamic and plant communities respond accordingly. As such, grassland managers should seek to adaptively manage meadows depending on annual weather patterns. Managers should also consider which management practices may be most suitable to different grasslands depending on varying cover of different plant lifeforms or sensitive species. Adaptive management prescriptions have been provided to promote both native plant diversity and cover and Ohlone Tiger Beetle habitat suitability, under varying rainfall patterns. UC Santa Cruz should invest more into campus stewardship and create an ecological restoration unit which will further improve campus sustainability goals and decrease natural resource management and mitigation costs for future expansion of the developed campus. Future increased enrollment goals of the University of California Office of the President will require additional student housing and support buildings, which in turn may require compensatory mitigation and protection in areas with sensitive habitat types or listed species. Several areas, especially Marshall Fields, Mima Meadow and Great Meadow, have been indicated as important areas for protection in this plan. This project and document were developed from funding support from the 2019-2020 Chancellor’s Graduate Internship Program at University of California, Santa Cruz. 1 Luong UC Santa Cruz Campus Grassland Management Plan UC Santa Cruz Sustainability, Enrollment and Long-Range Development Goals The University of California is committed to increasing enrollment at all campuses in order to meet rising demands for higher education in California (University of California 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Management Review, Ohlone Tiger Beetle
    Review of Historical and Current Land Use Practices, Characterization of Suitable Habitat, and Habitat Management Recommendations for the Endangered Ohlone Tiger Beetle, Cicindela ohlone (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) Review of Historical and Current Land Use Practices, Characterization of Suitable Habitat, and Habitat Management Recommendations for the Endangered Ohlone Tiger Beetle, Cicindela ohlone (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) Prepared for: Ventura Fish & Wildlife Office U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2493 Portola Road, Suite B Ventura, CA 93003-2922 Prepared by: Richard A. Arnold, PhD Entomological Consulting Services, Ltd. 104 Mountain View Court Pleasant Hill, CA 94523-2188 James W. Bartolome, PhD, CRM Dept. of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management 321 Hilgard Hall University of California Berkeley, CA 94720-3114 and Lawrence D. Ford, PhD, CRM and Devii R. Rao, MS LD Ford Rangeland Conservation Science 5984 Plateau Drive Felton, CA 95018-9253 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Project #11130000 Revised Final Report: March 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS.....................................................................................................i LIST OF TABLES..............................................................................................................ii LIST OF FIGURES.............................................................................................................ii INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………...1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE OTB ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence Report California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Natural Diversity Database
    Occurrence Report California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Natural Diversity Database Map Index Number: 34038 EO Index: 12605 Key Quad: Merritt (3812157) Element Code: AAAAA01180 Occurrence Number: 384 Occurrence Last Updated: 1996-07-09 Scientific Name: Ambystoma californiense Common Name: California tiger salamander Listing Status: Federal: Threatened Rare Plant Rank: State: Threatened Other Lists: CDFW_SSC-Species of Special Concern IUCN_VU-Vulnerable CNDDB Element Ranks: Global: G2G3 State: S2S3 General Habitat: Micro Habitat: CENTRAL VALLEY DPS FEDERALLY LISTED AS THREATENED. SANTA NEED UNDERGROUND REFUGES, ESPECIALLY GROUND SQUIRREL BARBARA & SONOMA COUNTIES DPS FEDERALLY LISTED AS BURROWS, & VERNAL POOLS OR OTHER SEASONAL WATER ENDANGERED. SOURCES FOR BREEDING. Last Date Observed: 1993-01-31 Occurrence Type: Natural/Native occurrence Last Survey Date: 1993-01-31 Occurrence Rank: Unknown Owner/Manager: PVT Trend: Unknown Presence: Presumed Extant Location: SOUTH WEST CORNER OF COVELL BLVD AND LAKE BLVD, IN THE CITY OF DAVIS. Detailed Location: FOUND IN THE PARKING LOT AT THE WILLOWS APARTMENTS. Ecological: Threats: URBAN DEVELOPMENT, AGRICULTURAL FIELDS AND TWO VERY BUSY ROADS. General: APARTMENT COMPLEX PARKING LOT LOCATED ACROSS LAKE BLVD FROM "WET POND" A CITY OWNED WILDLIFE HABITAT AREA MANAGED BY THE YOLO AUDUBON SOCIETY. PLSS: T08N, R02E, Sec. 07 (M) Accuracy: 80 meters Area (acres): 0 UTM: Zone-10 N4268740 E605722 Latitude/Longitude: 38.56082 / -121.78655 Elevation (feet): 50 County Summary: Quad Summary: Yolo
    [Show full text]
  • Ohlone Tiger Beetle (Cicindela Ohlone) 5-Year Review: Summary
    Ohlone tiger beetle (Cicindela ohlone) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photograph by Richard A. Arnold U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office Ventura, California November 2009 5-YEAR REVIEW Ohlone tiger beetle (Cicindela ohlone) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing of a species as endangered or threatened is based on the existence of threats attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of a species. In the 5-year review, we consider the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, and focus on new information available since the species was listed or last reviewed. If we recommend a change in listing status based on the results of the 5-year review, we must propose to do so through a separate rule-making process defined in the Act that includes public review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • California Terrestrial and Vernal Pool Invertebrates of Conservation Priority1
    California Terrestrial and Vernal Pool Invertebrates of Conservation Priority1 Species Federal ESA CA ESA G-Rank S-Rank Other Statuses GASTROPODA (Snails and slugs) Ammonitella yatesii None None G1 S1 IUCN - Vulnerable tight coin (=Yates' snail) Ancotrema voyanum None None G1G2 S1S2 BLM-Sensitive hooded lancetooth Assiminea infima None None G1 S1 IUCN - Vulnerable Badwater snail Binneya notabilis None None G1 S1 IUCN - Data Deficient Santa Barbara shelled slug Eremarionta immaculata None None G1 S1 IUCN - Vulnerable white desertsnail Eremarionta millepalmarum None None G1 S1 IUCN - Vulnerable Thousand Palms desertsnail Eremarionta morongoana IUCN - Near None None G1G3 S1 Morongo (=Colorado) desertsnail Threatened Eremarionta rowelli bakerensis None None G3G4T1 S1 IUCN - Data Deficient Baker's desertsnail Eremarionta rowelli mccoiana None None G3G4T1 S1 IUCN - Data Deficient California Mccoy snail Haplotrema catalinense None None G1 S1 Santa Catalina lancetooth Haplotrema duranti None None G1G2 S1S2 ribbed lancetooth Helminthoglypta allynsmithi None None G1 S1 IUCN - Vulnerable Merced Canyon shoulderband Helminthoglypta arrosa monticola None None G2G3T1 S1 mountain shoulderband Helminthoglypta arrosa pomoensis None None G2G3T1 S1 IUCN - Data Deficient Pomo bronze shoulderband Helminthoglypta ayresiana sanctaecrucis None None G1G2T1T2 S1S2 Ayer's snail Helminthoglypta callistoderma None None G1 S1 IUCN - Endangered Kern shoulderband 1 This list pertains to Scientific Collecting Permit regulations (Title 14, Section 650, California Code of Regulations). The species on this list include vernal pool, terrestrial, and aquatic invertebrates with a terrestrial phase that are listed under the Federal and California Endangered Species Acts, or have a NatureServe rank of G1, G1G2, S1, S1S2, SH or SX. For a full list of invertebrates of conservation concern, see the California Natural Diversity Database Special Animals List: https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Plants-and-Animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Conservation of Cicindela Ohlone Freitag and Kavanaugh, the Endangered Ohlone Tiger Beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Cicindelinae)
    Biology and Conservation of Cicindela ohlone Freitag and Kavanaugh, the Endangered Ohlone Tiger Beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Cicindelinae). I. Distribution and Natural History Author(s): C. Barry Knisley and Richard A. Arnold Source: The Coleopterists Bulletin, 67(4):569-580. 2013. Published By: The Coleopterists Society DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/0010-065X-67.4.569 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1649/0010-065X-67.4.569 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/ terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 67(4): 569–580. 2013. BIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION OF CICINDELA OHLONE FREITAG AND KAVANAUGH, THE ENDANGERED OHLONE TIGER BEETLE (COLEOPTERA:CARABIDAE: CICINDELINAE). I. DISTRIBUTION AND NATURAL HISTORY C. BARRY KNISLEY 1510 Beaverdam Creek Road Crozier, VA 23039, U.S.A. [email protected] AND RICHARD A. ARNOLD Entomological Consulting Services, Ltd., 104 Mountain View Court Pleasant Hill, CA 94523-2188, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Final City of Santa Cruz Operations and Maintenance Habitat Conservation Plan
    FINAL CITY OF SANTA CRUZ OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN for the ISSUANCE OF AN INCIDENTAL TAKE PERMIT UNDER SECTION 10(a)(1)(B) OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Prepared for: City of Santa Cruz Prepared by: Ebbin, Moser + Skaggs LLP Hagar Environmental Science Dana Bland & Associates Entomological Consulting Services, Ltd. Kittleson Environmental Consulting Services Biotic Resources Group January 25, 2021 Photo: Laguna Creek California red-legged frog by Chris Berry Acknowledgements Many City of Santa Cruz staff, consultants, academic advisors and United States Fish and Wildlife Service staff shared in the development of this document and supporting materials over the course of over 20 years. Special gratitude should be expressed for the efforts of Sean Skaggs, Marc Ebbin, Donna Meyers, Bill Kocher, Terrill Tompkins, Rosemary Menard, Chris Coburn, Heidi Luckenbach, Mark Dettle, Siobhan O’neill, Hoi Yu, Scott Ruble, Tony Elliot, Travis Beck, Leslie Keedy, Noah Downing, Kirk Lenington, Juliana Rebagliati, Jim Keller, Matt Baldzikowski, Zeke Bean, Ryan Bassett, Kelleen Harter, Kristina Finstad, Randy Holloway, Laird Henkel, Jessica Martinez-McKinney, Jeremy Farr, Andy Werner, Dick Arnold, Jeff Hagar, Camm Swift, Sean Barry, Dana Bland, Gary Kittleson, Kathy Lyons, Jeff Smith, Jean Baldridge, Wayne Spencer, Stanley Gregory, Grey Hayes, Peter Kareiva, Alan Launer, Peter Moyle, Terry Roelofs, Douglas Smith, Bruce Goldstein, Dave Pereksta, Lena Chang, Jake Martin, Chad Mitcham and Chris Berry. The completion of this document represents a significant milestone in the course of our City’s natural resources management and would not have been reached without their contributions and patient but passionate dedication to habitat conservation planning.
    [Show full text]