Rise of China Syllabus Final (September 5)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

The Rise of China PLSC 357/EAST 310/GLBL 309 Fall 2018: Mondays/Wednesdays 1:30-2:20 Daniel Mattingly Assistant Professor of Political Science Office: 405 Rosenkranz Hall Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Tuesdays 2 to 4. Please sign up on calendly.com/mattingly. Teaching Fellows: Christina Seyfried ([email protected]) James Sundquist ([email protected]) Yingqi (Ariel) Tang ([email protected]) Jiahua Yue ([email protected]) China’s rise on the world stage is arguably the most important geopolitical event of this century. How did a relatively poor nation become a prosperous and stable one? What implications does China’s increasing power have for the rest of the world? This course seeks to answer these questions, and serves as a broad introduction to Chinese politics. To understand the course of China’s economic and political rise, we begin with a chronological overview of China from the late Imperial era until the present day. Next, we consider the puzzle of how the country’s authoritarian system has remained resilient, at least so far. Finally, we will examine the consequences of China’s rise for the rest of the world. No knowledge of China or Chinese is assumed. Required Texts We will make use of the following texts. The books are available on Amazon and the Yale Bookstore (and have been placed on 2 hour hold in Bass). The estimated price to buy all of them new is $104. However, electronic copies of the Yuan and Weiss books are available for free through the Yale Library and the Joseph book is available for rent for about $12 on Amazon. • Joseph, William A., ed. Politics in China: An Introduction (2nd Edition). Oxford University Press, 2014. ($43 on Amazon or $12 to rent) • Weiss, Jessica Chen. Powerful Patriots: Nationalist Protest in China's Foreign Relations. Oxford University Press, 2014. Available online through the Yale Library. ($34 or free online via the Yale Library) • Yuan, Gao. Born Red: A Chronicle of the Cultural Revolution. Stanford University Press, 1987. ($27 or free online via the Yale Library) Technology The use of laptops and tablets in lecture is discouraged. Studies, including randomized control trials, have shown that students who use laptops in class perform worse than students who take notes by hand. Worse yet, laptop use has a negative effect on the academic performance of people sitting next to laptop users. With this in mind, those who elect to use laptops are encouraged to sit in the last three rows. Section leaders will set their own policies. Course Requirements The course will include a map quiz, two response papers, a midterm, and a take- home final. • 5% - Map Quiz (September 17) • 20% - In-Class Midterm (on China’s history, October 3) • 15% - 1st Response Paper (on China’s domestic politics) • 15% - 2nd Response Paper (on China’s international relations) • 30% - Take-Home Final (due by December 19) • 15% - Participation Short Response Papers Students will write 2 short response papers (3 to 4 pages double-spaced) that provide a critical analysis of 1 (or more) of the academic research papers assigned for the week the assignment is due. The teaching fellow will coordinate sign-ups for specific weeks. Response papers that are handed in late will be penalized a full letter grade per day, starting at the beginning of the section they are due. Exams The midterm exam will be an in-class 50-minute test that will cover material in Parts I and II. The final will be an open-book, take-home exam. It will be available between December 13 and December 19. You will have a set amount of time to complete the exam after you download it (likely to be 5 hours). You’ll also be given an extra half hour to check your work and read over the exam as the University’s academic regulations suggest. You’ll lose 1 point off your exam for every 10 minutes late you turn it in. Grading Please bring arithmetic errors in grading to our attention immediately. Otherwise, grades are final. The midterm, final, and response papers will not be regraded. Late Assignments Dean’s excuses are required for any response paper extension and for a missed midterm or final. Please see above for specific penalties. Academic Honesty Academic dishonesty of any kind is a serious offense. Students who plagiarize will automatically be reported to the Yale College Executive Committee and will receive a grade of zero for the assignment. A second offense will also be reported to the Executive Committee and will automatically result in a grade of F for the course. Please take note of the following from the Yale Center for Teaching and Learning: “You must document all of your source material. If you take any text from somebody else, you must make it clear the text is being quoted and where the t comes from. You must also cite any sources from which you obtain numbers, ideas, or other material. If you have any questions about what does or does not constitute plagiarism, ask! Plagiarism is a serious offense and will not be treated lightly. Fortunately, it is also easy to avoid and if you are the least bit careful about giving credit where credit is due you should not run into any problems.” Visit: http://ctl.yale.edu/writing/using-sources for more details. Course Readings Required readings are marked with a symbol. Optional readings, which are not required in any way, are marked with a ◦ symbol. I. Introduction August 29: Introduction to the Rise of China • Politics in China, pp. 1-18. • Svolik, Milan W. 2013. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapter 1, pp. 1-18. August 31: NO LECTURE II. Historical Overview: How Did China Go from Poor to Prosperous? September 5: The Last Golden Age (China Until 1839) • Confucius, The Analects, Books 1, 12-13. Translation by Robert Eno. You may wish to consult other translations as well. • Daniel Bell, “The Chinese Confucian Party?” Toronto Globe and Mail. February 19, 2010. • Shang Yang, The Book of Lord Shang, Chapter 8. • David K. Schneider, “China's Legalist Revival.” The National Interest. April 20, 2016. o Optional: Osnos, Evan. 2014. “Confucius Comes Home.” The New Yorker. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2014/01/13/140113fa_fact_osnos September 10: The Fall of the Qing (1839-1911) • Politics in China, Chapter 2, p. 41-53. • Wang, Zheng. Never Forget National Humiliation: Historical Memory in Chinese Politics and Foreign Relations. Columbia University Press, 2014. “Chapter 2: Chosen Glory, Chosen Trauma.” September 12: The Republican Era (1911-1949) • Politics in China, Chapter 2, p. 53-69. • Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. The Communist Manifesto. Chapter 1. • Zhao Suisheng. A Nation-State By Construction: Dynamics of Modern Chinese Nationalism. “Chapter 3: Building a Chinese Nation-State.” o Optional: Spence, Jonathan D. The search for modern China. WW Norton & Company, 1990, Parts III & IV. September 17: The Mao Era I (1949-1966) MAP QUIZ • Politics in China, Chapter 3, p. 72-116. • Mao Zedong. “On the People's Democratic Dictatorship.” 30 June 1949. o Optional: Yang Jisheng. Tombstone: The Great Chinese Famine, 1958- 1962. Macmillan, 2012. “Introduction: An Everlasting Tombstone” o Optional: Mao Zedong. “On the Correct Handling of Contradictions Among the People.” September 19: The Mao Era II (1966-1978) • Gao Yuan, Born Red: A Chronicle of the Cultural Revolution. Suitable for response paper. o Optional: MacFarquhar, Roderick, and Michael Schoenhals. Mao's Last Revolution. Harvard University Press, 2009. September 24: Reform and Opening Begins (1978-1989) • Politics in China, Chapter 4, p. 119-129. • Ang, Yuen Yuen. 2016. How China Escaped the Poverty Trap. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Introduction, Chapter 1. Suitable for response paper. o Optional: Deng Xiaoping. 16 September 1978. “Hold High the Banner of Mao Zedong Thought and Adhere to the Principle of Seeking Truth From Facts." September 26: The 1989 Prodemocracy Movement • Politics in China, Chapter 4, p. 129-138. • Zhao, Dingxin. "Ecologies of Social Movements: Student Mobilization during the 1989 Prodemocracy Movement in Beijing." American Journal of Sociology 103.6 (1998): 1493-1529. Suitable for response paper. o Optional: Documentary: Gate of Heavenly Peace. o Optional: Nathan, Andrew J. 2001. “The Tiananmen Papers." Foreign Affairs 80(1): p. 2-48. o Optional: Louisa Lim, The People's Republic of Amnesia: Tiananmen Revisited, Chapter 1. October 1: The Path to Xi Jinping (1989-Present) • Politics in China, Chapter 4, p. 138-144. • Evan Osnos. “Born Red.” The New Yorker. April 6, 2015. o Optional: Andrew Nathan. “China: The Struggle At the Top” New York Review of Books. February 9, 2017. http://www.chinafile.com/library/nyrb-china-archive/china-struggle-top October 3: In-Class Midterm Exam III. Domestic Politics: What Explains the Resilience of the CCP? October 8: Political Ideology • Politics in China, Chapter 5; p. 149-62 and 177-188. • Perry, Elizabeth J. “The populist dream of Chinese democracy.” The Journal of Asian Studies 74.4 (2015): 903-915. Suitable for response paper. • Taisu Zhang. “What It Means to Be ‘Liberal’ or ‘Conservative’ in China.” Foreign Policy. April 24, 2015. o Optional: Xu Zhangrun, “Imminent Fears, Immediate Hopes.” Circulated online. Translated by Geremie R. Barmé. o Optional: Jiang Shigong: “Philosophy and History: Interpreting the ‘Xi Jinping Era’ through Xi’s Report to the Nineteenth National Congress of the CCP” Open Times (开放时代). January 2018. Translation by David Ownby. o Optional: “Charter 08.” Available at http://www.cecc.gov/resources/legal- provisions/charter-08-chinese-and-english-text October 10: Political Institutions • Politics in China, Chapter 6, p.
Recommended publications
  • E PRC's First National Critique: E 1954 Campaign to “Discuss the Draft

    E PRC's First National Critique: E 1954 Campaign to “Discuss the Draft

    e PRC’s First National Critique: < = e 1954 Campaign to > ? “Discuss the Dra# Constitution” @ L V /FJM+%JBNBOUBOE9JBPDBJ'FOH Y Z <[ ABSTRACT << is article is the $rst detailed exposition of the “National Discussion of the Dra# Constitution”. <= In mid-1954, Chinese engaged in a wide-ranging deliberation about political and social rights, <> the obligations of citizenship, state symbols, political institutions and ideology. Many asked <? penetrating and frequently prescient questions about law, citizenship, class and political power, <@ and o%ered provocative suggestions for revision. Using archives and publications, we argue that, for citizens, the constitutional discussion constituted the earliest national-level, semi-public <L exposé and critique of the entirety of CCP governing practices—a “dress rehearsal” for the 1956 <V Hundred Flowers Movement. For o(cials, the constitutional discussion provided an opportu- <Y nity to deploy the coercive language of “state law” to overcome resistance to collectivization, and <Z a tactic to deal with “unruly” citizens. We further suggest that the 1954 discussion set the terms =[ of broad-based, but ultimately limited, constitutional critique from the 1950s until the present. =< == => he Constitution is a hot document in China. Emboldened by several =? speeches by Xi Jinping ( 习近平) and other senior leaders, 1 reformers have T =@ advanced the argument that “constitutional government” ( xianzheng 宪政) based =L on China’s own foundational document (in force since 1954, revised in 1975, =V 1978 and 1982), rather than Western-style democracy, could clear a pathway to- =Y wards a more open and accountable political system. In late 2012 and early 2013, =Z in+uential media outlets, including Study Times ( Xuexi shibao 学习时报), an or- >[ gan of the Central Party School, advised leaders to “rule by its Constitution”.
  • “Avant-Garde” Legal Scholarship

    “Avant-Garde” Legal Scholarship

    Washington University Global Studies Law Review Volume 13 Issue 1 2014 Ideological Renewal and Nostalgia in China’s “Avant-garde” Legal Scholarship Samuli Seppänen The Chinese University of Hong Kong Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Legal Education Commons, Legal History Commons, and the Rule of Law Commons Recommended Citation Samuli Seppänen, Ideological Renewal and Nostalgia in China’s “Avant-garde” Legal Scholarship, 13 WASH. U. GLOBAL STUD. L. REV. 083 (2014), https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies/vol13/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Global Studies Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IDEOLOGICAL RENEWAL AND NOSTALGIA IN CHINA’S “AVANT-GARDE” LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP SAMULI SEPPÄNEN∗∗∗ ABSTRACT This Article examines certain attempts in Chinese legal scholarship to formulate alternatives to “Western” or “liberal” rule of law ideology. The Article discusses three different strands of contemporary Chinese “avant- garde” legal scholarship: (i) neo-conservative critical scholarship, which builds on American legal realism, critical legal studies, and critical social theory; (ii) a form of New Confucian virtue-based legal thought, which combines traditionalist Chinese ethics with Western virtue ethics; and (iii) certain communitarian rule of law theories. The Article identifies a paradox in the premise of Chinese avant-garde scholars’ ideological renewal project: avant-garde scholars can only hope to create illusions of ideological change, often through nostalgic arguments, lest their proposals appear too unrealistic or outlandish.
  • The Spirit of Cities

    The Spirit of Cities

    THE SPIRIT OF CITIES T H E S P I R I T OF CITIES Why the Identity of a City Matters in a Global Age Daniel A. Bell and Avner de-Shalit princeton university press princeton oxford Copyright © 2011 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW press.princeton.edu All Rights Reserved Third printing, and first paperback printing, with a new preface by the authors, 2014 Paperback ISBN 978-0-691-15969-0 The Library of Congress has cataloged the cloth edition of this book as follows Bell, Daniel (Daniel A.), 1964– The spirit of cities : why the identity of a city matters in a global age / Daniel A. Bell and Avner de-Shalit. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-691-15144-1 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Cities and towns—Social aspects. 2. Identity politics. 3. Urban policy. I. De-Shalit, Avner. II. Title. HT151.B415 2011 307.76—dc23 2011019200 British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available This book has been composed in Garamond and Archer Printed on acid-free paper. ∞ Printed in the United States of America 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 TO CITY-ZENS CONTENTS Acknowledgments ix Preface to the Paperback Edition: The City and Identity xi Introduction: Civicism 1 Jerusalem: The City of Religion 18 Montreal: The City of Language(s) 56 Singapore: The City of Nation Building 78 Hong Kong: The City of Materialism 111 Beijing: The City of Political Power 140 Oxford: The City of Learning 161 Berlin: The City of (In)Tolerance 191 Paris: The City of Romance 222 New York: The City of Ambition 249 Notes 279 Selected Bibliography 321 Index 333 vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The idea for this book came to us in early September 2001, when we were walk- ing the streets of San Francisco (the official reason for the trip was a meeting of the American Political Science Association).
  • Hong Kong's Autonomy After the New National Security Law: Challenges

    Hong Kong's Autonomy After the New National Security Law: Challenges

    Hong Kong’s Autonomy After The New National Security Law: Challenges and Perspectives Date: 1 October 2020 Panelists: Sebastian Veg (Professor of Intellectual History of Modern & Contemporary China, School of Advanced Studies in Social Sciences, Paris); Victoria Tin-bor Hui (Associate Professor in Political Science, University of Notre Dame, Indiana - USA); Samson Yuen (Assistant Professor, Department of Government and International Studies, Hong Kong Baptist University); Ilaria Maria Sala (Journalist and Writer based in Hong Kong) Moderator: Dr. Hemant Adlakha The Law of the People's Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, was passed by the National People’s Congress on the 30th of June, 2020. Article 18 of the Hong Kong Basic Law allows Chinese laws to be valid in Hong Kong if they are included in Annex III of the Basic Law. This national security law adds teeth to Article 23 of the Basic Law, which reads: “The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall enact laws on its own to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government, or theft of state secrets, to prohibit foreign political organisations or bodies from conducting political activities in the Region, and to prohibit political organisations or bodies of the Region from establishing ties with foreign political organisations or bodies.” Numerous attempts have been made in the past such as in 2003 to enact national security laws under the aegis of Article 23 but they have not come to fruition given public opposition to the same. The latest effort began in the Summer of 2019 with the Extradition Law Amendment Bill which again saw massive opposition by student led 1 movements, however these events made Beijing go the Article 18 route and pass a law concerning Hong Kong, given that the protests would preclude the passing of the same under Article 23.
  • Resolving Constitutional Disputes in Contemporary China

    Resolving Constitutional Disputes in Contemporary China

    Resolving Constitutional Disputes in Contemporary China Keith Hand* Beginning in 1999, a series of events generated speculation that the Chinese Party-state might be prepared to breathe new life into the country’s long dormant constitution. In recent years, as the Party-state has strictly limited constitutional adjudication and moved aggressively to contain some citizen constitutional activism, this early speculation has turned to pessimism about China’s constitutional trajectory. Such pessimism obscures recognition of alternative or hybrid pathways for resolving constitutional disputes in China. Despite recent developments, Chinese citizens have continued to constitutionalize a broad range of political-legal disputes and advance constitutional arguments in a variety of forums. This article argues that by shifting focus from the individual legal to the collective political dimension of constitutional law, a dimension dominant in China’s transitional one-party state, we can better understand the significance of the constitution in China and identify patterns of bargaining, consultation, and mediation across a range of both intrastate and citizen-state constitutional disputes. Administrative reconciliation and “grand mediation,” dispute resolution models at the core of recent political-legal shifts in China, emphasize such consultative practices. This zone of convergence reveals a potential transitional path * Associate Professor of Law, University of California, Hastings College of the Law. Former Beijing Director and Senior Fellow, The China Law Center, Yale Law School (2005–2008) and Senior Counsel, U.S. Congressional-Executive Commission on China (2002–2005). The author thanks Donald Clarke, Michael Dowdle, Bruce Hand, Nicholas Howson, Hilary Josephs, Chimène Keitner, Tom Kellogg, Evan Lee, Benjamin Liebman, Lin Xifen, Carl Minzner, Randall Peerenboom, Zhang Qianfan, colleagues at the UC Hastings Junior Faculty Workshop, and members of the Chinalaw List for their thoughtful comments and feedback on drafts of the article.
  • MA Thesis Yu-Hsuan

    MA Thesis Yu-Hsuan

    The University of Chicago The New Left vs. Liberal Debate in China: How Ideology Shapes the Perception of Reality By Yu-Hsuan Sun July 2021 A paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Masters of Arts Degree in the Masters of Arts Program in the Social Sciences (MAPSS) Faculty Advisor: Marco Garrido Preceptor: Wen Xie Abstract: The tragic June 4th Crackdown on the Tiananmen Student Movement dealt a devastating blow to the hope of China’s democratization. In the 1980s, the majority of young Chinese students expressed overwhelming support for the democracy movement and the New Enlightenment thought trend which preceded the 1989 protests. The homogeneity of the 80s intellectual sphere, however, is a stark contrast to the intense debate between the “New Left” and “Liberal” camps in China which began in the late 1990s. My paper seeks to answer the question: “Why did China’s intellectual homogeneity dissolve so quickly in the 90s?” And more importantly, “What is at stake in those debates between intellectual camps?” To answer these questions, I argue that ideological differences among Chinese intellectuals fundamentally change their perception of China’s post-1989 reality. After the Tiananmen Movement, Deng Xiaoping intensified China’s economic reforms as an answer to both the internal and external crises to his political power after June 4th. While this new wave of reforms brought about unprecedented economic growth and commerce in China, it also created looming social problems such as inequality and corruption. However, these social issues generated polarizing responses from Chinese intellectuals who offered contradicting explanations to these social and economic issues.
  • The “China Dream” and the African Reality: the Role of Ideology in PRC-Africa Relations

    The “China Dream” and the African Reality: the Role of Ideology in PRC-Africa Relations

    OCTOBER 2020 The “China Dream” and the African Reality: The Role of Ideology in PRC-Africa Relations BY JAMES BARNETT © 2020 Hudson Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. For more information about obtaining additional copies of this or other Hudson Institute publications, please visit Hudson’s website, www.hudson.org ABOUT HUDSON INSTITUTE Hudson Institute is a research organization promoting American leadership and global engagement for a secure, free, and prosperous future. Founded in 1961 by strategist Herman Kahn, Hudson Institute challenges conventional thinking and helps manage strategic transitions to the future through interdisciplinary studies in defense, international relations, economics, health care, technology, culture, and law. Hudson seeks to guide public policy makers and global leaders in government and business through a vigorous program of publications, conferences, policy briefings and recommendations. Visit www.hudson.org for more information. Hudson Institute 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Fourth Floor Washington, D.C. 20004 +1.202.974.2400 [email protected] www.hudson.org Cover: A Chinese paramilitary policeman patrols past a memorial to the late South African leader Nelson Mandela outside the South African embassy in Beijing on December 11, 2013. South Africa’s ambassador to China has compared Nelson Mandela to Mao Zedong, the Communist leader whose rule saw tens of millions killed by famine and the chaos of the Cultural Revolution. (Mark Ralston/AFP via Getty Images) OCTOBER 2020 The “China Dream” and the African Reality: The Role of Ideology in PRC-Africa Relations BY JAMES BARNETT ABOUT THE AUTHOR James Barnett is an independent researcher and writer specializing in African security issues.
  • As Statist Apologists Written by Chris Man-Kong Li

    As Statist Apologists Written by Chris Man-Kong Li

    Opinion – The Chinese ‘New Left’ as Statist Apologists Written by Chris Man-kong Li This PDF is auto-generated for reference only. As such, it may contain some conversion errors and/or missing information. For all formal use please refer to the official version on the website, as linked below. Opinion – The Chinese ‘New Left’ as Statist Apologists https://www.e-ir.info/2020/09/09/opinion-the-chinese-new-left-as-statist-apologists/ CHRIS MAN-KONG LI, SEP 9 2020 In April, on the occasion of commemoration of the 150th anniversary of Lenin’s birth, the leading Chinese ‘New Left’ scholar Wang Hui published an essay to praise what he sees as Lenin’s great ‘revolutionary personality’ (a useful translation can be found in the website Reading the China Dream, with introductions situating the contexts). Rong Jian, a liberal independent scholar, produced two pieces criticizing Wang, claiming that Wang’s essay signifies Wang’s ‘Heidegger Moment’ to rationalize an authoritarian regime. Rong’s pieces were soon censored, despite their rather abstract and scholarly tones. All the while Wang’s essay stands in the Chinese internet behind the Great Firewall. This is a microcosm of how the Chinese ‘New Left’ turned into statist apologists for the Chinese Communist Party. It is not true that Wang’s essay is uncritical to the existing Chinese Communist regime. Amidst its praise of the so- called ‘People’s War’ strategy adopted by the Beijing government in fighting COVID-19, Wang did underscore the ‘the bad habits of bureaucratism and formalism’ that at times appeared in the ‘state system’, which led to many mistakes in the early phrase of the fight against the pandemic.
  • China's Vision for a New World Order

    China's Vision for a New World Order

    the national bureau of asian research nbr special report #83 | january 2020 china’s vision for a new world order By Nadège Rolland cover 2 NBR Board of Directors John V. Rindlaub Mark Jones Matt Salmon (Chairman) Co-head of Macro, Corporate & Vice President of Government Affairs Senior Managing Director and Investment Bank, Wells Fargo Securities Arizona State University Head of Pacific Northwest Market Wells Fargo & Company East West Bank Scott Stoll Roy D. Kamphausen (Treasurer) Thomas W. Albrecht President Partner (Ret.) Partner (Ret.) NBR Ernst & Young LLP Sidley Austin LLP Ryo Kubota Mitchell B. Waldman Dennis Blair Chairman, President, and CEO Executive Vice President, Government Chairman Acucela Inc. and Customer Relations Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. U.S. Navy (Ret.) Quentin W. Kuhrau CEO Maria Livanos Cattaui Unico Properties LLC Honorary Directors Secretary General (Ret.) Lawrence W. Clarkson Melody Meyer International Chamber of Commerce Senior Vice President (Ret.) President The Boeing Company George Davidson Melody Meyer Energy LLC (Vice Chairman) Thomas E. Fisher Long Nguyen Vice Chairman, M&A, Asia-Pacific (Ret.) Senior Vice President (Ret.) Chairman, President, and CEO HSBC Holdings plc Unocal Corporation Pragmatics, Inc. Norman D. Dicks Joachim Kempin Kenneth B. Pyle Senior Policy Advisor Senior Vice President (Ret.) Professor, University of Washington Van Ness Feldman LLP Microsoft Corporation Founding President, NBR Richard J. Ellings Clark S. Kinlin Jonathan Roberts President Emeritus and Counselor President and CEO Founder and Partner NBR Corning Cable Systems Ignition Partners Corning Incorporated Kurt Glaubitz Tom Robertson Global Media Relations Manager George F. Russell Jr. Corporate Vice President and Chevron Corporation (Chairman Emeritus) Deputy General Counsel Chairman Emeritus Microsoft Corporation Russell Investments NBR Counselors Charles W.
  • China's Embattled “Rule of Law”

    China's Embattled “Rule of Law”

    China’s Embattled “Rule of Law”: Paradoxes and the Breakthrough Under Single Party Dominance by Hao Wang A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Graduate Department of East Asian Studies University of Toronto © Copyright by Hao Wang, 2014 China’s Embattled “Rule of Law”: Paradoxes and the Breakthrough Under Single Party Dominance Hao Wang Master of Arts Department of East Asian Studies University of Toronto 2014 Abstract China’s thirty years of economic development has brought on a number of crippling problems: high inequality, unbalanced development, environmental degradation and so forth. Arguably all of them coincide with China’s long-enduring absence of a full- fledged legal system that could balance state power and human rights, in another word, the “rule of law”. Looking into reform advancement and regression of China’s legal development, this thesis argues that a “rule of law” regime as proposed by Pan Wei would either fail to come into being, or will not do the job, without constitutional and legislative reform. This thesis argues that China’s centuries-old civic project is one focusing on building constitutionalism, and a Chinese Socialist Constitutional State conducive to Socialist democracy as proposed in the thesis would better reconcile the needs of the Party and society at this critical juncture, as well as in the long run. ii This thesis is dedicated to Prof. H.X.Wang and Dr. S.Q. Zhu, grandpa and grandma, for their love and discipline. iii Acknowledgments This thesis, with its flaws, humbly adds another layer of uncertainty to the existing chaos in the field.
  • Sse Verfassung Und Und Völkerrecht Recht in Übersee VRÜ LAW and POLITICS in AFRICA | ASIA | LATIN AMERICA

    Sse Verfassung Und Und Völkerrecht Recht in Übersee VRÜ LAW and POLITICS in AFRICA | ASIA | LATIN AMERICA

    Nürnberger Prozesse Verfassung und und Völkerrecht Recht in Übersee VRÜ LAW AND POLITICS IN AFRICA | ASIA | LATIN AMERICA Herausgegeben von Aus dem Inhalt: Brun-Otto Bryde Abhandlungen Philip Kunig Hidemi Suzuki Rundfunk- und Presserecht in Japan – The Nuremberg War Crimes Trial and Karl-Andreas Hernekamp its Policy Consequences Today aktuelle Probleme Herausgegeben von Prof. Dr. Beth A. Griech-Polelle Kazuhiko Matsumoto 2009, ca. 209 S., brosch., 44,– €, durch die Grundrechtlicher Umweltschutz in Japan ISBN 978-3-8329-3906-9 Hamburger Gesellschaft Björn Ahl Erscheint Februar 2009 Normative oder semantische Verfassung? für Völkerrecht und Der Diskurs in der Volksrepublik China um Auswärtige Politik e. V. die Vereinbarkeit des Sachenrechtsgesetzes Gegen Ende des Zweiten Weltkrieges mussten die führenden Politiker der Welt entscheiden, was mit der Verfassung mit mutmaßlichen Kriegsverbrechern geschehen sollte. Im Jahr 1945 wurde erstmals ein Interna- Kolja Naumann tionales Militärtribunal (International Military Tribunal, IMT) eingerichtet, um die strafrechtliche Korean Constitutional Law confronted with Verfolgung von Kriegsverbrechen zu demonstrieren. Dreizehn Beiträge untersuchen sowohl die the possibility of reunification: Can german kurzfristigen Effekte des Nürnberger Prozesses gegen die Hauptkriegsverbrecher als auch aktuelle experiences help? Auswirkungen z. B. auf den Internationalen Strafgerichtshof. Die Aufsätze enthalten Analysen von sowjetischen Untersuchungen über Naziverbrechen während des Krieges, Analysen der Reaktion Jörg
  • Pax Sinica and the Limits of Confucianism Joyce C. H. Liu

    Pax Sinica and the Limits of Confucianism Joyce C. H. Liu

    Pax Sinica and the Limits of Confucianism1 Joyce C. H. Liu National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan The Question This article tries to respond to the question whether there’s any epistemology that is geographically particular and could be free from the concentric and oppressive tendency of ideological system. Would the South-South epistemological challenge unbind the North hegemony? Could the knowledge from Asia or the third world, taking the Chinese tradition for example, propose a challenge that confronts the so-called ―West,‖ and serve as an antidote to solve the questions posed by the history of imperialist-colonial expansion in various forms, from the 16th century down to the 21st century? Where are the ―Souths‖ today? Is the ―South‖ a cartographical designation that refers to the ―South‖ of the globe on the map? But, the ―South,‖ just like the ―West‖ or the ―East,‖ is defined through geo-political perspective. In whatever geographical area, be it the southern parts of the Pacific Rim or the southern provinces of China, or the southern parts in Taiwan, there is always a regime of center and periphery in terms of the political society and the power structure. To take the Asian or the ―southern‖ epistemology as opposed to the West or the European or the ―northern‖ ones exactly falls into the trap of area studies that 1 Published at Cosmopolis: A Review of Cosmopolitics. 2016-1. http://www.cosmopolis-rev.org/2016-1/confucianism-and-its-limits-wherefrom-the-emancipatory- epistemology 1 fixates a geographically delineated location, as possessing a unique, particular and even exceptional culture, neglecting the fact that the long historical processes have again and again testified the global flux and mixture of cultures and people throughout centuries in different societies.