DOCSLIB.ORG

Restructuring-Integrated-Safeguards-Data-Sheet-GZ-Integrated-Cities-And-Urban

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Restructuring-Integrated-Safeguards-Data-Sheet-GZ-Integrated-Cities-And-Urban The World Bank RESTRUCTURING ISDS GZ-Integrated Cities and Urban Development Project (P150991) Public Disclosure Authorized Integrated Safeguards Data Sheet Restructuring Stage Public Disclosure Authorized Restructuring Stage | Date ISDS Prepared/Updated: 12-Jan-2021| Report No: ISDSR31294 Public Disclosure Authorized Regional Vice President: Ferid Belhaj Country Director: Kanthan Shankar Regional Director: Ayat Soliman Practice Manager/Manager: Jaafar Sadok Friaa Task Team Leader(s): Rafeef Abdelrazek, Christopher T. Pablo Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank RESTRUCTURING ISDS GZ-Integrated Cities and Urban Development Project (P150991) . I. BASIC INFORMATION 1. BASIC PROJECT DATA Project ID Project Name P150991 GZ-Integrated Cities and Urban Development Project Task Team Leader(s) Country Rafeef Abdelrazek, Christopher T. Pablo West Bank and Gaza Approval Date Environmental Category 21-Sep-2016 Partial Assessment (B) Managing Unit SMNUR PROJECT FINANCING DATA (US$, Millions) SUMMARY-NewFin1 Total Project Cost 5.00 Total Financing 5.00 Financing Gap 0.00 DETAILS-NewFinEnh1 Non-World Bank Group Financing Trust Funds 5.00 Special Financing 5.00 2. PROJECT INFORMATION PROG_INF O Current Program Development Objective The proposed PDO is to enhance the capacity of participating urban areas to plan for sustainable urban growth. The World Bank RESTRUCTURING ISDS GZ-Integrated Cities and Urban Development Project (P150991) 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. The Integrated Cities and Urban Development Project (ICUD) supports local government units (LGUs) of the five leading socio-economic urban areas in West Bank and Gaza (WB&G): Gaza City, Nablus urban area, Hebron urban area, Bethlehem urban area, and Ramallah-Al Bireh urban area1. These five participating urban areas were selected based on their strategic importance in terms of population and future economic growth and include 16 municipalities, 14 village councils, and 8 refugees camps, serving a total of 1.45 million people2, or approximately 30 percent of WB&G’s population. 2. This is the first project to introduce cross-jurisdictional “metropolitan” planning across the LGUs of the leading urban areas in the Palestinian territories. To support this new process of collaboration between the urban area LGUs in the West Bank and to foster ownership and commitment for joint activities, ICUD facilitates the development of intra- urban area coordination mechanisms (joint coordination units – JCUs) to be operational in all of the participating urban areas except for Gaza City, which is comprised of a single LGU.3 Through the intra-urban area JCUs, the participating urban areas in the West Bank, along with Gaza City, are supported by the project to conduct urban growth planning. The project is also strengthening the institutional and technical capacity of participating urban areas to plan for sustainable urban growth through, inter alia, the provision of technical assistance (TA), goods, and training in order to enable the areas to respond more efficiently to the needs of their growing populations and the private sector with more sustainably and well- planned urban spaces and infrastructure. 3. ICUD finances the following components: (a) Component 1: Planning for Sustainable Urban Growth strengthens the institutional and technical capacity of participating urban areas to plan for sustainable urban growth through, inter alia, the provision of TA, goods, and training. Component cost is US$4.55 million from TFGWB and US$19.09 million from PID-MDTF. (b) Component 2: Project Implementation Support and Management Cost finances the training, operating costs, and goods necessary for the technical oversight and implementation support of the proposed project to be performed by, inter alia, a Technical Supervisor and Local Coordinator for the Bethlehem, Hebron, Nablus, Ramallah-Al Bireh urban areas. This component also finances the management fee of the Municipal Development and Lending Fund (MDLF), which manages procurement, finance, safeguards, and reporting for the project based on technical inputs from the Technical Supervisor. Component cost is US$0.45 million. 4. As requested by the Palestinian Authority (PA), through the Ministry of Finance, and the Municipal Development and Lending Fund (MDLF) and Ministry of Local Government (MoLG), as the Implementing Agencies of the project, ICUD will be restructured to incorporate the following changes: (i) an adjustment of the scope of Component 1 to include the addition of works; (ii) revision of the Results Framework to establish previously undefined targets and capture additional project results; and (iii) an extension of the project closing date to allow for full achievement of both the project indicators and the PDO. 1 With the exception of Gaza City, which is located in the Gaza Strip, the latter four urban areas are located in the West Bank and are considered the territory’s major “urban agglomerations”, which are defined as built-up urban areas extending across existing municipal and village council boundaries with common labor and housing markets. They were identified at project preparation through spatial analysis of urban extent and in consultation with MoLG and selected LGUs. 2 As per Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS) 2017 census figures. 2021 predicted population for the corresponding areas is 1.59 million. 3 Ramallah, Al Bireh, and Bitounia municipalities prior to the project had a joint unit. The project works with this unit. Based on the spatial analysis of the area, Surda-Abu Qash Municipality was added to the unit under this project. The World Bank RESTRUCTURING ISDS GZ-Integrated Cities and Urban Development Project (P150991) 5. As part of the adjustment of the scope of Component 1, small-scale works in the form of demonstration projects will be added to pilot prioritized joint investments by the participating urban area LGUs. These projects are intended to demonstrate the benefits and effectiveness of coordinated planning and sustain the progress and momentum of joint cooperation and integrated planning that ICUD has fostered among the agglomeration LGUs. To include these activities under the project, an amendment will be drafted to include “works” under the project Grant Agreement. 4. PROJECT LOCATION AND SALIENT PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS RELEVANT TO THE SAFEGUARD ANALYSIS (IF KNOWN) The project's activities are being implemented in the five leading socio-economic urban areas in West Bank and Gaza. These consist of Gaza City in the Gaza Strip and four urban agglomerations in the West Bank: (i) Nablus urban area; (ii) Hebron urban area; (iii) Bethlehem urban area; and (iv) Ramallah-Al Bireh urban area. These five participating urban areas were selected because of their strategic importance in terms of population and future economic growth, and include 16 municipalities, 14 village councils, and 8 refugees camps, serving a total of 1.45 million people, or approximately 30 percent of the population. 5. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS SPECIALISTS ON THE TEAM Helen Z. Shahriari, Social Specialist Shafick Hoossein, Environmental Specialist Najm-Ul-Sahr Ata-Ullah, Social Specialist SAFEGUARD_TABLE 6. SAFEGUARD POLICIES TRIGGERED Safeguard Policies Triggered Explanation To safeguard for potential downstream environmental and social risks of the project activities, the project is categorized as a Category B and the instrument used is an Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF), which will act as the overarching tool to guide the project. This ESMF will screen all ICUD planning studies and works, explicitly exclude activities with category A impacts (if any), identify potential downstream Environmental Assessment (OP) (BP 4.01) Yes environmental and social risks, and guide preparation of safeguards-specific studies in parallel to technical planning activities. More specifically, Terms of Reference for the activities financed under Components 1 and 2 (Planning for Sustainable Urban Growth and Project Implementation Support and Management Costs) will contain provisions to examine the environmental and social implications of any policy The World Bank RESTRUCTURING ISDS GZ-Integrated Cities and Urban Development Project (P150991) changes, modifications in land use, detailed studies of specific infrastructure, and any issues of potential impact to beneficiaries. Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) will also be prepared to guide and monitor each activity involving works under the pilot projects. Consultations to be carried out for each pilot project will inform affected businesses and people on the proposed activities and potential impacts (e.g., disruptions caused during construction) as well as orient them on the project GRM. As the project includes works, the ESMPs will incorporate aspects of Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Standards relevant to the proposed activities and mitigate for and adequately address any impacts that may arise. A Strategic Environment and Social Assessment (SESA) was also prepared under the project as one of the tools under the ESMF. It is used as a guiding tool for the pilot activities to identify the priority impacts but also to advise the project on what opportunities and constraints exist the context of the project. Performance Standards for Private Sector No N/A Activities OP/BP 4.03 Sub-project screening forms will ensure exclusion Natural Habitats (OP) (BP 4.04) No of any activities with potential OP 4.04 impacts. Sub-project screening forms will ensure exclusion
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Origins of Hamas: Militant Legacy Or Israeli Tool?
    THE ORIGINS OF HAMAS: MILITANT LEGACY OR ISRAELI TOOL? JEAN-PIERRE FILIU Since its creation in 1987, Hamas has been at the forefront of armed resistance in the occupied Palestinian territories. While the move- ment itself claims an unbroken militancy in Palestine dating back to 1935, others credit post-1967 maneuvers of Israeli Intelligence for its establishment. This article, in assessing these opposing nar- ratives and offering its own interpretation, delves into the historical foundations of Hamas starting with the establishment in 1946 of the Gaza branch of the Muslim Brotherhood (the mother organization) and ending with its emergence as a distinct entity at the outbreak of the !rst intifada. Particular emphasis is given to the Brotherhood’s pre-1987 record of militancy in the Strip, and on the complicated and intertwining relationship between the Brotherhood and Fatah. HAMAS,1 FOUNDED IN the Gaza Strip in December 1987, has been the sub- ject of numerous studies, articles, and analyses,2 particularly since its victory in the Palestinian legislative elections of January 2006 and its takeover of Gaza in June 2007. Yet despite this, little academic atten- tion has been paid to the historical foundations of the movement, which grew out of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Gaza branch established in 1946. Meanwhile, two contradictory interpretations of the movement’s origins are in wide circulation. The !rst portrays Hamas as heir to a militant lineage, rigorously inde- pendent of all Arab regimes, including Egypt, and harking back to ‘Izz al-Din al-Qassam,3 a Syrian cleric killed in 1935 while !ghting the British in Palestine.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaza Emergency Daily Report – 31 August 2014
    Gaza Emergency Daily Report – 31 August 2014 Transport Services Logistics Cluster transportation into the Gaza Strip since activation on 30 July 2014: Total Number of Trucks 184 Total Number of Pallets 4809 Total number Organizations Supported 37 Logistics Cluster transportation into the Gaza Strip – 31 August 2014: Final Number Number of Consignor From Consignee Sector Destination of pallets Trucks Shelter Global Communities Ramallah Gaza City CHF International 30 1 Food Ministry Of Social Ministry Of Social Shelter Ramallah Gaza City 140 5 Affairs (MoSA) Affairs (MoSA) Gaza WASH Agricultural Agricultural Food Development Development Ramallah Gaza City 52 Shelter 2 Association (PARC) Association (PARC) WASH Ramallah Gaza Union of Union of Agricultural Food Agricultural Work Work Committees Nablus Gaza City 31 Shelter 1 Committees (UAWC) WASH (UAWC) Food Hebron Food Trade Ministry Of Social Hebron Gaza City 56 Shelter 2 Association Affairs (MoSA) Gaza WASH Food Social Welfare Ministry Of Social Bethlehem Gaza City 23 Shelter 1 Committee Affairs (MoSA) Gaza WASH Private donation from Ministry Of Social Shelter Bethlehem Gaza City 14 Dar Salah Affairs (MoSA) Gaza Food Earth & Human Applied Research Center for Shelter Institute- Bethlehem Gaza City 2 1 researches and Food Jerusalem(ARIJ) studies (EHCRS) Social Welfare Ministry Of Social Shelter Bethlehem Gaza City 10 Committee Affairs (MoSA) Gaza Food TOTAL 358 13 Coordination/ Information Management/ GIS The Logistics Cluster is compiling information and assessing partners’ needs to determine whether the Rafah crossing can be used on a more permanent basis to support the humanitarian community transport relief items from Egypt into the Gaza Strip. www.logcluster.org Gaza Emergency Daily Report – 31 August 2014 Logistics Gaps and Bottlenecks The Logistics Cluster continues to monitor the impact of the ceasefire on logistics access constraints and the security of humanitarian space for the transportation and distribution of relief supplies.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaza CRISIS)P H C S Ti P P I U
    United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs occupied Palestinian territory Zikim e Karmiya s n e o il Z P m A g l in a AGCCESSA ANDZ AMOV EMENTSTRI (GAZA CRISIS)P h c s ti P P i u F a ¥ SEPTEMBER 2014 o nA P N .5 F 1 Yad Mordekhai EREZ CROSSING (BEIT HANOUN) occupied Palestinian territory: ID a As-Siafa OPEN, six days (daytime) a B?week4 for B?3the4 movement d Governorates e e of international workers and limited number of y h s a b R authorized Palestinians including aid workers, medical, P r 2 e A humanitarian cases, businessmen and aid workers. Jenin d 1 e 0 Netiv ha-Asara P c 2 P Tubas r Tulkarm r fo e S P Al Attarta Temporary Wastewater P n b Treatment Lagoons Qalqiliya Nablus Erez Crossing E Ghaboon m Hai Al Amal r Fado's 4 e B? (Beit Hanoun) Salfit t e P P v i Al Qaraya al Badawiya i v P! W e s t R n m (Umm An-Naser) n i o » B a n k a North Gaza º Al Jam'ia ¹¹ M E D I TER RAN EAN Hatabiyya Ramallah da Jericho d L N n r n r KJ S E A ee o Beit Lahia D P o o J g Wastewater Ed t Al Salateen Beit Lahiya h 5 Al Kur'a J a 9 P l D n Treatment Plant D D D D 9 ) D s As Sultan D 1 2 El Khamsa D " Sa D e J D D l i D 0 D s i D D 0 D D d D D m 2 9 Abedl Hamaid D D r D D l D D o s D D a t D D c Jerusalem D D c n P a D D c h D D i t D D s e P! D D A u P 0 D D D e D D D a l m d D D o i t D D l i " D D n .
    [Show full text]
  • The Palestinian People
    The Palestinian People The Palestinian People ❖ A HISTORY Baruch Kimmerling Joel S. Migdal HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England 2003 Copyright © 1994, 2003 by Baruch Kimmerling and Joel S. Migdal All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America An earlier version of this book was published in 1994 as Palestinians: The Making of a People Cataloging-in-Publication data available from the Library of Congress ISBN 0-674-01131-7 (cloth) ISBN 0-674-01129-5 (paper) To the Palestinians and Israelis working and hoping for a mutually acceptable, negotiated settlement to their century-long conflict CONTENTS Maps ix Preface xi Acknowledgments xxi Note on Transliteration xxiii Introduction xxv Part One FROM REVOLT TO REVOLT: THE ENCOUNTER WITH THE EUROPEAN WORLD AND ZIONISM 1. The Revolt of 1834 and the Making of Modern Palestine 3 2. The City: Between Nablus and Jaffa 38 3. Jerusalem: Notables and Nationalism 67 4. The Arab Revolt, 1936–1939 102 vii Contents Part Two DISPERSAL 5. The Meaning of Disaster 135 Part Three RECONSTITUTING THE PALESTINIAN NATION 6. Odd Man Out: Arabs in Israel 169 7. Dispersal, 1948–1967 214 8. The Feday: Rebirth and Resistance 240 9. Steering a Path under Occupation 274 Part Four ABORTIVE RECONCILIATION 10. The Oslo Process: What Went Right? 315 11. The Oslo Process: What Went Wrong? 355 Conclusion 398 Chronological List of Major Events 419 Notes 457 Index 547 viii MAPS 1. Palestine under Ottoman Rule 39 2. Two Partitions of Palestine (1921, 1949) 148 3. United Nations Recommendation for Two-States Solution in Palestine (1947) 149 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaza Strip 2020 As-Siafa Mapping Movement and Access Netiv Ha'asara Temporary
    Zikim Karmiya No Fishing Zone 1.5 nautical miles Yad Mordekhai January Gaza Strip 2020 As-Siafa Mapping Movement and Access Netiv Ha'asara Temporary Ar-Rasheed Wastewater Treatment Lagoons Sources: OCHA, Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics of Statistics Bureau Central OCHA, Palestinian Sources: Erez Crossing 1 Al-Qarya Beit Hanoun Al-Badawiya (Umm An-Naser) Erez What is known today as the Gaza Strip, originally a region in Mandatory Palestine, was created Width 5.7-12.5 km / 3.5 – 7.7 mi through the armistice agreements between Israel and Egypt in 1949. From that time until 1967, North Gaza Length ~40 km / 24.8 mi Al- Karama As-Sekka the Strip was under Egyptian control, cut off from Israel as well as the West Bank, which was Izbat Beit Hanoun al-Jaker Road Area 365 km2 / 141 m2 Beit Hanoun under Jordanian rule. In 1967, the connection was renewed when both the West Bank and the Gaza Madinat Beit Lahia Al-'Awda Strip were occupied by Israel. The 1993 Oslo Accords define Gaza and the West Bank as a single Sheikh Zayed Beit Hanoun Population 1,943,398 • 48% Under age 17 July 2019 Industrial Zone Ash-Shati Housing Project Jabalia Sderot territorial unit within which freedom of movement would be permitted. However, starting in the camp al-Wazeer Unemployment rate 47% 2019 Q2 Jabalia Camp Khalil early 90s, Israel began a gradual process of closing off the Strip; since 2007, it has enforced a full Ash-Sheikh closure, forbidding exit and entry except in rare cases. Israel continues to control many aspects of Percentage of population receiving aid 80% An-Naser Radwan Salah Ad-Deen 2 life in Gaza, most of its land crossings, its territorial waters and airspace.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaza-Jericho Agreement
    GAZA-JERICHO AGREEMENT ANNEX II Protocol Concerning Civil Affairs Article I Liaison and Coordination in Civil Matters A. Joint Civil Affairs Coordination and Cooperation Committee 1. Joint Civil Affairs Coordination and Cooperation Committee (hereinafter "the CAC") is hereby established. 2. The functions of the CAC are to coordinate between the Palestinian Authority on one hand, and Israel and the Civil Administration that shall continue to function in the rest of the West Bank on the other hand, concerning the following day-to-day matters: a. Civil matters, including issues concerning the transfer of powers and responsibilities from the Israeli military government and its Civil Administration to the Palestinian Authority. Matters arising with regard to roads, power lines and other infrastructure which require coordination according to this Agreement. b. Questions regarding passage to and from the Gaza Strip and the Jericho Area and safe passage between the Gaza Strip and the Jericho Area, including crossing points and international crossings. c. Day-to-day contacts between the two sides as regards matters such as employment permits, hospitalization, transportation licensing, transfer of information, etc. d. Joint projects, matters of mutual interest and other matters requiring coordination and cooperation. 3. The CAC shall be comprised of an equal number of representatives from Israel and from the Palestinian Authority, and shall convene at least once a month unless otherwise agreed. Each side may initiate the convening of a special meeting on short notice. 4. The CAC shall determine by agreement its mode of procedure. 5. Matters of principle and policy not settled within the CAC shall be passed on to the Joint Israeli-Palestinian Liaison Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Anera's Situation Report from Palestine
    Palestine Situation Report June 7, 2021 Background The immediate background to the current period of violence is summarized in Anera’s last Situation Report (May 24). Ongoing updates may be found on our Updates on the Crisis in Palestine blog. Overview As of June 7, 29 Palestinians have been killed in the West Bank, including four children, and an additional 6,309 people have been injured. In East Jerusalem, at least one Palestinian has been killed, and 1,011 people have been injured.1 In Gaza, no serious incidents have been reported since the ceasefire began on May 21st. During the 11-day conflict, 256 Palestinians were killed, including 66 children. According to UNOCHA, 8,500 Palestinians in Gaza remain internally displaced and are staying either with host families or in two UNRWA schools. Nearly 2,000 Palestinians in Gaza were injured during the 11-day conflict, including 600 children, some of whom will suffer from long term disabilities that require medical rehabilitation.2 As protests and confrontations continue across the West Bank, a substantial number of injuries have been treated, and there is growing concern about the number of live ammunition injuries, as it further threatens the security of medical staff attempting to reach those in need of medical services. The medical staff of the Palestinian Red Crescent Society (PRCS) and the Palestine Medical Relief Society, two of Anera’s major partners, constitute some of the key medical staff responding to injuries coming from incidents on the ground. At least 41 health care workers have been injured in the West Bank, and 21 medical service vehicles have been damaged or confiscated.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Palestine ‘Escalation in the Gaza
    State of Palestine ‘Escalation in the Gaza Strip, the West Bank and Israel’ Report No. 4 3 June 2021 SoP/2021/Eyad AlBaba - UNICEF Ⓒ UNICEF Special Representative and UNICEF partners with youth volunteers cleaning rubble and debris from the streets and schools of Gaza City caused by the recent hostilities. 02 June 2021 Situation in Number Highlights 73 Children killed (71 • No further hostilities have been reported in the Gaza Strip since the ceasefire Palestinians & 2 Israelis) on 21 May. However, 8,500 people still remain internally displaced. • On 25 May, 120,000 doses of Pfizer vaccine arrived through the COVAX 1,006 Children injured mechanism, with 45,000 doses already delivered to the Gaza Strip. • The three major desalination plants in the Gaza Strip are back in operation, (946 Palestinians & 60 operating for 8 hours each per day, serving approximately 370,000 people. Israelis) • UNICEF with partners mobilized over 1,000 adolescent volunteers towards clean-up efforts and to provide support to internally displaced persons in the 8,500 Internally Gaza Strip in the aftermath of the recent escalation. Displaced People remain • UNICEF delivered 156,700 medical consumables items to the Gaza Strip, as with host families well as 7,500 catheter tubes and 250 oxygen prongs for neonates to Al- Makased hospital in East Jerusalem. • UNICEF has provided Psychosocial Support Services (PSS) to 3,000 children 57 Educational facilities in Hebron Area C, H2 and East Jerusalem. damaged • The Education Cluster co-led by UNICEF and Save the Children, and the UNICEF-led WASH cluster are undertaking assessments to contribute to the 29 Health facilities Rapid Damage Needs Assessment (RDNA), and UNICEF is contributing to the Social Protection and Youth components of the RDNA undertaken by the World damaged Bank, the EU and the UN.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gaza Strip and Jericho
    February 1995 Vol. 7, No. 2 THE GAZA STRIP AND JERICHO HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER PALESTINIAN PARTIAL SELF-RULE CONTENTS SUMMARY........................................................................................................................ 2 MAP.................................................................................................................................... 2 RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................... 8 To the Palestinian Authority................................................................................... 8 To the Israeli Authorities........................................................................................ 8 To the Israeli and Palestinian Authorities ............................................................ 9 To Militants on All Sides ....................................................................................... 9 To the International Community ............................................................................ 9 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 10 THE INTERNATIONAL LAW FRAMEWORK............................................................. 11 THE LEGAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY ....................... 13 THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY'S VIOLATION OF RIGHTS IN THE SELF-RULE AREAS ................................................................................................................ 14 The Need to
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Hamas: Conflict in Gaza (2008-2009)
    = 87&*1=&3)= &2&8a=43+1.(9=.3=&?&=,**28,**3== .2=&3499.`= 447).3&947= 3&1>89=.3= .))1*=&89*73=++&.78= &741=.,)&14;.9?= 5*(.&1.89=.3= .))1*=&89*73=++&.78= *7*2>=_=-&75= 5*(.&1.89=.3= .))1*=&89*73=++&.78= &8*>=_=)).8= 3&1>89=.3= .))1*=&89*73=++&.78= -7.8945-*7=_=1&3(-&7)= 3&1>89=.3= .))1*=&89*73=++&.78= -4)&=&7,*8843= 5*(.&1.89=.3=39*73&9.43&1=:2&3.9&7.&3=41.(>= *'7:&7>=+3`=,**3= 43,7*88.43&1= *8*&7(-=*7;.(*= 18/1**= <<<_(78_,4;= .*+*+= =*5479=+47=43,7*88 Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress 87&*1=&3)= &2&8a= 43+1.(9=.3=&?&=,**28,**3== = :22&7>= On December 27, 2008, Israel launched a major military campaign dubbed “Operation Cast Lead” against Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The Israeli offensive came in response to markedly increased Palestinian rocket fire following the expiration of a six-month cease-fire on December 19. On January 3, 2009, Israel began a ground offensive into Gaza. Despite international pressure to halt the fighting (including the passage of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1860 on January 8), the conflict continued until January 18, when Israel unilaterally ceased fire and Hamas followed suit shortly thereafter. Israel’s technological superiority and reliance on heavy armor and firepower contributed to a wide disparity in casualties—approximately 1,440 Palestinians have died (with some organizations estimating that at least half of the dead are civilians), compared with 13 dead (including four civilians) on the Israeli side.
    [Show full text]
  • Bad to Worse in Gaza City - By: Alisha Hawley 1
    Bad to Worse in Gaza City - By: Alisha Hawley 1 It is clear to see the many tragedies that are currently Bad to Worse in Gaza City taking place within Gaza City, as well as many other cities and towns like it. Though this suffering is also found in By: Alisha Hawley Israel especially in its agricultural areas, it is drastically different in Gaza. Why is this? Israel is allied with the 06/01/2021 US, and its US-funded “Iron Dome defense system” protects them from a good majority of the rockets. Is American funding just protecting civilian lives, or is it also encouraging the continuation of a tragic war? The Palestinian Legislative Organization building in Gaza City which was destroyed in 2009 By: Alisha Hawley The recent conflict in the Gaza Strip between the Hamas and Israeli forces has taken a deep toll on both sides, but there have been some islands of sanctuary. One of these islands was a neighborhood in Gaza City, one that has never been bombed before. Using the concept of place is helpful in understanding the current terror taking place there. The concept of place offers a greater understanding of the true tragedies that happen as a result of this war. Just as you gain a better sense of a plant’s structure by observing the area it resides in, you can gain a better understanding of a conflict and the people who are a part of it by understanding their surroundings. Place refers to the environment in which an individual lives, like a neighborhood, village, or town.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Environmental Assessment of the Gaza Strip Map 1. Regional
    Map 1. Regional map 34°E 35°E 36°E UKRAINE ° LEBANONLEBANON Al Qunaytirah Black Sea BULGARIA ITALY 33°N TURKEY GREECE SYRIASYRIA Mediterranean Sea SYRIA Haifa Lake Tiberias Nazareth Dar'a EGYPT SAUDI LIBYA ARABIA Irbid a e Al Mafraq S n a e Az Zarqa' n a WESTWEST BANKBANK As-Salt r Tel Aviv 32°N r Amman e Ramla i t Ramallah d ! Ariha e M Jerusalem ! Betlehem Dead Gaza City Sea GAZAGAZA STRIPSTRIP Beersheba JORDANJORDAN Al Karak El'Arish 31°N ISRAELISRAEL At Tafilah Qa El Jinz EGYPTEGYPT Ma'an 30°N 0 20406080100Km Sources: VMAP0; RWDB, DPKO. The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement by the United Nations. UNEP PCDMB - 2009 Environmental Assessment of the Gaza Strip 7 Map 2. Gaza Strip ° West Bank Erez Crossing Point a Ï" e Gaza North Jordan S Israel Beit Lahiya Jabaliyah Beit Hanoun n Beach Jabalia a ] e n Gaza Gaza a r r Ï" e Nahal Oz t Ï" i Karni Crossing Point d e M Nusayrat Al Burayj Shaykh al Maghazi MiddleDayr Area al Balah Deir al Balah Khan Yunis IsraelIsrael Khan Yunus Khan Yunis Rafah Rafah Legend p Airport Rafah Port ] Ï" Checkpoints Main roads " Rafah Ï" Ï Crossing Point p Sufa Crossing Point Landuse/Landcover Former Israeli settlements EgyptEgypt (disengaged in 2005) Ï" UNRWA Camps Kerem Shalom Crossing Point Urban Area Natural reserve 0246810Km Sources:Sources: OCHA,OCHA, UNWRA, UNWRA, GIST,GIST, PEQA, PEQA, UNOSAT.UNOSAT. The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement by the United Nations.
    [Show full text]