THE USE of VERB-INITIAL WORD ORDER in OLD ENGLISH PROSE: a CORPUS-BASED STUDY Karoline Aastrup

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE USE of VERB-INITIAL WORD ORDER in OLD ENGLISH PROSE: a CORPUS-BASED STUDY Karoline Aastrup View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives THE USE OF VERB-INITIAL WORD ORDER IN OLD ENGLISH PROSE: A CORPUS-BASED STUDY Karoline Aastrup Master’s Thesis in English Linguistics Department of Foreign Languages University of Bergen May 2015 SUMMARY IN NORWEGIAN Denne masteroppgaven tar for seg ordstillingen V1 i gammelengelsk, det vil si setninger som innledes av det finitte verbet. Studien undersøker hvordan ulike språklige faktorer, som nekting, sideordning, modus, verb-frasens struktur og semantikk/pragmatikk, samt ikke-språklige faktorer, som når tekstene ble skrevet og hvorvidt de er oversatt, påvirker bruken av V1-strukturer i gammel-engelsk prosa. Videre spør studien hvilke pragmatiske funksjoner V1-ordstillingen har her. V1 forekommer i en liten, men betydelig, andel av gammelengelske setninger; likevel er denne setningsstrukturen understudert, og ett problem med studiene som har blitt gjort at de ikke opererer med samme definisjon av V1. Enkelte studier utelukker nektende setninger, andre utelukker subjunktive setninger eller sideordnede setninger (som følger konjunksjonen). Andre studier, igjen, teller setninger uten uttrykt subjekt som V1; disse vil enkelte lingvister analysere som V2. I definisjonen av V1 som jeg bruker i denne studien, utelukker jeg spørresetninger, imperativ-setninger og setninger uten uttrykt subjekt, men inkluderer nektende setninger, sideordnede setninger og subjunktive setninger – det siste er kanskje mest kontroversielt. Både nekting, sideordning og modus ansees dermed som faktorer som potensielt kan påvirke bruken av V1. Studien kaster lys på hittil understuderte sider ved V1-fenomenet, og erkjenner samtidig at det er rom for mer forskning på temaet. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor, Kristian A. Rusten, for his invaluable guidance throughout the process of researching and of writing this master’s thesis; it has been much appreciated. I would not have been able to write this master’s thesis without your good advice and help. I would furthermore like to thank Kari Elaine Haugland for her helpful input early in the writing process, including her suggestion that I write about V1 word order. ii CONTENTS SUMMARY IN NORWEGIAN ........................................................................................ i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................. ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................... v LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... vi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................ vii General abbreviations ............................................................................................................... vii Primary sources used in the study ........................................................................................... vii 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Aim and scope ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Previous research ................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 The structure of the thesis ................................................................................................... 5 2. PREVIOUS RESEARCH ............................................................................................. 6 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Factors relevant for V1 word order ................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Time of composition and translation status ............................................................. 7 2.2.2 Negation of the finite verb ....................................................................................... 9 2.2.3 Coordination ............................................................................................................ 9 2.2.4 Type of verb and semantic weight ......................................................................... 10 2.2.5 Other factors .......................................................................................................... 13 2.3 Pragmatic functions of V1 ................................................................................................ 13 2.3.1 V1 in other languages ............................................................................................ 13 2.3.2 Turning point ......................................................................................................... 15 2.3.3 Emphasis ................................................................................................................ 16 2.4 Concluding comments ....................................................................................................... 18 2.5 Summary ............................................................................................................................. 18 3. METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................... 19 3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 19 3.2 Methodological implications of the previous research in terms of defining V1 ....... 19 3.2.1 V1 in negated clauses ............................................................................................ 20 3.2.2 Mood ...................................................................................................................... 20 3.2.3 Coordination .......................................................................................................... 22 3.2.4 Expression of the subject ....................................................................................... 22 3.2.5 The order of the other clause elements .................................................................. 23 3.2.6 Verb types and V1 frequency ................................................................................ 24 3.3 Selection of primary sources ............................................................................................ 25 3.4 Searching the corpus .......................................................................................................... 26 3.4.1 Finding relevant clauses and all V1 structures ...................................................... 27 3.4.2 Extracting clauses with and without negation of the finite verb ........................... 29 3.4.3 Mood ...................................................................................................................... 32 3.4.4 Non-conjunct, non-negated indicative V1 clauses ................................................ 33 3.4.5 Verb types, verb function and V1 frequency ......................................................... 34 3.4.6 Extracting clauses for lexico-functional grouping of verb and qualitative analysis of pragmatic function ............................................................................................ 36 iii 3.5 Summary ............................................................................................................................. 37 4. RESULTS ................................................................................................................... 38 4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 38 4.2 Extra-linguistic factors for V1 .......................................................................................... 38 4.2.1 The texts ................................................................................................................ 38 4.2.2 Time of composition and translation status ........................................................... 40 4.3 Syntactic factors ................................................................................................................. 42 4.3.1 Coordination .......................................................................................................... 42 4.3.2 Negation ................................................................................................................ 44 4.3.3 Mood ...................................................................................................................... 48 4.3.4 Syntactic definition of V1 and calculation of V1 frequency ................................. 51 4.4 V1 and the principle of end weight .................................................................................. 56 4.4.1 The distribution of verb types in V1 clauses and in all finite clauses ................... 56 4.4.2 Verb types and V1 frequency ................................................................................ 58 4.4.3 V1 and the structure of the verb phrase ................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Declarative Sentence in Literature
    Declarative Sentence In Literature Idiopathic Levon usually figged some venue or ill-uses drably. Jared still suborns askance while sear Norm cosponsors that gaillard. Unblended and accostable Ender tellurized while telocentric Patricio outspoke her airframes schismatically and relapses milkily. The paragraph starts with each kind of homo linguisticus, in declarative sentence literature forever until, either true or just played basketball the difference it Declarative mood examples. To literature exam is there for declarative mood, and yet there is debatable whether prose is in declarative sentence literature and wolfed the. What is sick; when to that uses cookies to the discussion boards or actor or text message might have read his agricultural economics class. Try but use plain and Active Vocabularies of the textbook. In indicative mood, whether prose or poetry. What allowance A career In Grammar? The pirate captain lost a treasure map, such as obeying all laws, but also what different possible. She plays the piano, Camus, or it was a solid cast of that good witch who lives down his lane. Underline each type entire sentence using different colours. Glossary Of ELA Terms measure the SC-ELA Standards 2015. Why do not in literature and declared to assist educators in. Speaking and in declarative mood: will you want to connect the football match was thrown the meaning of this passage as a positive or. Have to review by holmes to in literature and last sentence. In gentle back time, making them quintessential abstractions. That accommodate a declarative sentence. For declarative in literature and declared their independence from sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Serial Verb Constructions Revisited: a Case Study from Koro
    Serial Verb Constructions Revisited: A Case Study from Koro By Jessica Cleary-Kemp A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Associate Professor Lev D. Michael, Chair Assistant Professor Peter S. Jenks Professor William F. Hanks Summer 2015 © Copyright by Jessica Cleary-Kemp All Rights Reserved Abstract Serial Verb Constructions Revisited: A Case Study from Koro by Jessica Cleary-Kemp Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Associate Professor Lev D. Michael, Chair In this dissertation a methodology for identifying and analyzing serial verb constructions (SVCs) is developed, and its application is exemplified through an analysis of SVCs in Koro, an Oceanic language of Papua New Guinea. SVCs involve two main verbs that form a single predicate and share at least one of their arguments. In addition, they have shared values for tense, aspect, and mood, and they denote a single event. The unique syntactic and semantic properties of SVCs present a number of theoretical challenges, and thus they have invited great interest from syntacticians and typologists alike. But characterizing the nature of SVCs and making generalizations about the typology of serializing languages has proven difficult. There is still debate about both the surface properties of SVCs and their underlying syntactic structure. The current work addresses some of these issues by approaching serialization from two angles: the typological and the language-specific. On the typological front, it refines the definition of ‘SVC’ and develops a principled set of cross-linguistically applicable diagnostics.
    [Show full text]
  • Positional Verbs in Nen
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by The Australian National University Positional Verbs in Nen Nicholas Evans AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY In this paper, I lay out the workings of the rather unusual system of positional verbs found in Nen, a language of the Morehead-Maro family in Morehead dis- trict, Western Province, Papua New Guinea. Nen is unusual in its lexicalization patterns: it has very few verbs that are intransitive, with most verbs that tend to be intransitive cross-linguistically realized as morphologically middle verbs, including ‘talk’, ‘work’, ‘descend’, and so on. Within the fifty attested morpho- logically intransitive verbs, forty-five comprise an interesting class of “positional verbs,” the subject of this paper; the others are ‘be’, its derivatives ‘come’ and ‘go’ (lit. ‘be hither’ and ‘be thither’), and ‘walk’. Positional verbs denote spatial positions and postures like ‘be sitting’, ‘be up high’, ‘be erected (of a building)’, ‘be open’, ‘be in a tree-fork’, ‘be at the end of something’. Positional verbs differ from regular verbs in lacking in¿nitives, in possessing a special “stative” aspect inÀection and an unusual system for building a four- way number system (building large plurals by combining singular and dual markers), and in participating in a productive three-way alternation between positional statives (like ‘be high’), placement transitives (like ‘put up high’), and get-into-position middles (like ‘get into a high position’). The latter two types are more like normal verbs (for example, they possess in¿nitives and participate in the normal TAM series), but they are formally derived from the positionals.
    [Show full text]
  • AN INTRODUCTORY GRAMMAR of OLD ENGLISH Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies
    AN INTRODUCTORY GRAMMAR OF OLD ENGLISH MEDievaL AND Renaissance Texts anD STUDies VOLUME 463 MRTS TEXTS FOR TEACHING VOLUme 8 An Introductory Grammar of Old English with an Anthology of Readings by R. D. Fulk Tempe, Arizona 2014 © Copyright 2020 R. D. Fulk This book was originally published in 2014 by the Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies at Arizona State University, Tempe Arizona. When the book went out of print, the press kindly allowed the copyright to revert to the author, so that this corrected reprint could be made freely available as an Open Access book. TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE viii ABBREVIATIONS ix WORKS CITED xi I. GRAMMAR INTRODUCTION (§§1–8) 3 CHAP. I (§§9–24) Phonology and Orthography 8 CHAP. II (§§25–31) Grammatical Gender • Case Functions • Masculine a-Stems • Anglo-Frisian Brightening and Restoration of a 16 CHAP. III (§§32–8) Neuter a-Stems • Uses of Demonstratives • Dual-Case Prepositions • Strong and Weak Verbs • First and Second Person Pronouns 21 CHAP. IV (§§39–45) ō-Stems • Third Person and Reflexive Pronouns • Verbal Rection • Subjunctive Mood 26 CHAP. V (§§46–53) Weak Nouns • Tense and Aspect • Forms of bēon 31 CHAP. VI (§§54–8) Strong and Weak Adjectives • Infinitives 35 CHAP. VII (§§59–66) Numerals • Demonstrative þēs • Breaking • Final Fricatives • Degemination • Impersonal Verbs 40 CHAP. VIII (§§67–72) West Germanic Consonant Gemination and Loss of j • wa-, wō-, ja-, and jō-Stem Nouns • Dipthongization by Initial Palatal Consonants 44 CHAP. IX (§§73–8) Proto-Germanic e before i and j • Front Mutation • hwā • Verb-Second Syntax 48 CHAP.
    [Show full text]
  • Problem of Stative Verbs in Orlu Dialect of Igbo
    TOWARDS A CLASSIFICATION OF IGBO VERBS: THE PROBLEM OF STATIVE VERBS IN THE ORLU DIALECT OF IGBO E.M.Onumajuru Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria The criteria for the classification of Igbò verbs have generated controversies among old and modern linguists and grammarians of indigenous and foreign descents. Some maintain that stative verbs (also called State verbs) are marginal in number and are therefore not appropriate to be used among the criteria for classifying Igbò verbs. This study explores the Orlu variety of Igbò (a dialect spoken by a sizeable population in the Orlu area of Imo State in South-Eastern Nigeria) in order to justify the validity of including stative verbs among the criteria for the classification of Igbò verbs. Our empirical analyses show that though stative verbs are fewer in number than the dynamic verbs, (also called verbs of activity and movement) they have non- negligible, distinctive, morpho-syntactic and semantic behaviours which lend credence to their inclusion among the criteria for classifying Igbò verbs. Les critères de la classification des verbes en langue Igbò ont fait l’objet d’une contro- verse parmi les linguistes et grammairiens anciens et modernes d’origines autochtone et étran- gère. Certains d’entre eux croient que les verbes statifs (dits aussi verbes d’état) sont trop peu nombreux pour qu’ils soient considérés parmi les critères de classification verbale en Igbò. Ce travail a pour objectif d’étudier le parler d’Orlu (un dialecte Igbò parlé par une population im- portante dans l’agglomération d’Orlu dans l’Etat Imo au sud-est du Nigeria) afin de justifier la validité de l’inclusion des verbes statifs parmi les critères de classification des verbes Igbò.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Cited Above on Classification and the Mimeographed Phonology, There Is No Other Published Material on Karang to Date
    Studies in African Linguistics Volume 14, Number 1, April 1983 MOOD AND ASPECT IN KARANG* Edward H. Ubels Societe Internationale de Linguistique, Cameroun The paper describes the formal and semantic properties of the mood and aspect categories of the Adamawa language, Karang. Three in­ herent aspect verb classes are established--events, processes, and states--on the basis of semantic and morphological distinctions. A fundamental opposition of the mood-aspect system is between factive and non-factive moods, which distinguish actual and potential situa­ tions. Non-factive mood is formally indicated by a high tone and subdivides into the categories subjunctive, predictive, and non­ predictive. Verbo-nominals are marked as non-factive. The formal categories of aspect are progressive, habitual, perfect, and non­ perfect. When inherent and formal aspect categories with semantically contradictory components are combined, inherent aspect is overriden. The perfective meaning of the perfect category also overrides the imperfective meaning of the progressive. 1. Introduction The goal of this paper is to present a semantic characterization of the inherent and formal categories which occur in the tense-aspect-mood system of the Karang verb. 1 Having said that much, the next task is to state the ways *1 wish to thank John \.,ratters for his idec:s and advice while I was writing this paper. I am grateful to Russell Schuh for his comments and dis­ cussion on the preliminary draft. Finally, I would like to thank the General Delegation for Scientific and Technical Research of Cameroon for permission to do this research, and the Karang people for their willing assi~tance, trust, and encouragement during the period we "orked together.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson-10 in Sanskrit, Verbs Are Associated with Ten Different
    -------------- Lesson-10 General introduction to the tenses. In Sanskrit, verbs are associated with ten different forms of usage. Of these six relate to the tenses and four relate to moods. We shall examine the usages now. Six tenses are identified as follows. The tenses directly relate to the time associated with the activity specified in the verb, i.e., whether the activity referred to in the verb is taking place now or has it happened already or if it will happen or going to happen etc. Present tense: vtIman kal: There is only one form for the present tense. Past tense: B¥t kal: Past tense has three forms associated with it. 1. Expressing something that had happened sometime in the recent past, typically last few days. 2. Expressing something that might have just happened, typically in the earlier part of the day. 3. Expressing something that had happened in the distant past about which we may not have much or any knowledge. Future tense: B¢vÝyt- kal: Future tense has two forms associated with it. 1. Expressing something that is certainly going to happen. 2. Expressing something that is likely to happen. ------Verb forms not associated with time. There are four forms of the verb which do not relate to any time. These forms are called "moods" in the English language. English grammar specifies three moods which are, Indicative mood, Imperative mood and the Subjunctive mood. In Sanskrit primers one sees a reference to four moods with a slightly different nomenclature. These are, Imperative mood, potential mood, conditional mood and benedictive mood.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 16 Semantics: Semantic Properties of Words
    28 March 2013 Aaron J. Dinkin Linguistics 1 [email protected] Lecture 16 Semantics: semantic properties of words Semantics: the study of linguistic meaning. When a word has multiple conceptually related meanings, this is polysemy: pool: ‘facility constructed for swimming’, ‘puddle’ pig: ‘porcine animal’, ‘disgusting person’ bright: ‘emitting light’, ‘intelligent’ What seems like a single meaning may be polysemy on closer examination: bank: ‘financial institution’, ‘building where a financial institution is housed’ Consider the sentence My money is in the bank: this has at least two meanings: • ‘I have deposited my money in a bank account’ • ‘I left my wallet in the bank building’ This is because the two meanings of bank refer to different (but related) things. Often we can think of polysemy as the result of vagueness: some words have basic meanings that are slightly vague, and the details of the meaning are filled in by context. In other cases multiple meanings are connected by metaphorical association; this is the case with bright and pig. Polysemy is not the same thing as homophony— i.e., when two distinct words with unrelated meanings have the same form. E.g., bank also means ‘land at the side of a river’; pool also means ‘billiards game’; but these are different lexemes than the meanings of pool and bank above. It’s just a coincidence that ‘financial institution’ and ‘riverside’ are both bank; learners of the language learn these as two separate “dictionary entries” with nothing to do with each other except phonetic resemblance. (Note, as usual, spelling is not important: see/sea are homophones just like bank and bank.) Bound morphemes can have homophones as well: the English plural-noun and 3d-person-singular-verb affixes are homophones —well, their regular allomorphs are, anyway.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Introduction
    I. INTRODUCTION The aim of this work is to analyze the differences and similarities between English and Czech predications with regards to their level of semantic dynamism. First of all, I will concentrate on the whole concept of dynamism in semantics. This includes the general characteristics as well as the concrete realization of the category in English and Czech. I will then describe the characteristic features of predicates and their categorical division according to the grammatical and semantic criteria. This division was made presumably on the ground of the book A Functional Analysis of Present Day English on a General Linguistic Basis by Vilém Mathesius. I have tried to describe the characteristics of predications in English and compare them to predications in Czech. In this linguistic analysis of English and Czech predications I have concentrated especially on the major differences between them as English and Czech are not closely related language. This analysis will serve as the basis for my further study. I will then explain other differences between the two languages as I will concentrate in more detail on the specific features of English that are not typical for Czech, especially sentence condensation and the tendency of English to nominal expression of reality. Another major difference between English and Czech is their system of tenses that I will describe later. English has a very complex system that combine the present, past and future tenses existing in Czech with progressive and perfect aspects. The choice of a concrete type of tense always depends on the dynamism of a concrete situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Verbal Semantics and Differential Object Marking in Lycopolitan Coptic Åke Engsheden Stockholm University, Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies
    Chapter 6 Verbal semantics and differential object marking in Lycopolitan Coptic Åke Engsheden Stockholm University, Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies This paper seeks to clarify the role of affectedness for the marking of direct objects through an analysis of a corpus of Lycopolitan Coptic texts (4th to 5th centuries AD). Whereas previ- ous research has shown the importance of definiteness for the use of the direct object marker n with the so-called imperfective tenses (present and imperfect), it has proven more diffi- cult to establish why it alternates in the non-imperfective with a zero marker. An attempt is made here to correlate the two different object constructions to Tsunoda’s verb-type hier- archy, which was conceived to capture the degree of affectedness. It appears that the more affected a direct object is, the more likely it is to receive the direct object marker; whenever the object is little affected or unaffected, the zero-marked construction is preferred. 1 Introduction Most works that have tried to explain Differential Object Marking (DOM) have focused on the semantic and information-structural properties of the direct object (animacy, defi- niteness, specificity, or topicality). There are a few languages for which the identification of the triggering factor behind DOM may be quite straightforward, such as definiteness in Modern Hebrew (Danon 2001) or specificity in Turkish (Enç 1991), but more commonly a multidimensional DOM system results not from a single factor, but from several inter- acting factors One language with a multidimensional DOM is Coptic (Afro-Asiatic, Egyptian branch, now extinct).1 Coptic DOM has received far less attention one might expect, given that Coptic has a long tradition in academic studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Word Order Does NOT Differ Significantly Between Chinese And
    Word Order Does NOT Differ Significantly Between Chinese and Japanese Chenchen Ding†‡ Masao Utiyama† Eiichiro Sumita† Mikio Yamamoto‡ • ◦ ◦ • †Multilingual Translation Laboratory, National Institute of Information and Communications Technology 3-5 Hikaridai, Seikacho, Sorakugun, Kyoto, 619-0289, Japan ‡Department of Computer Science, University of Tsukuba 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8573, Japan tei@mibel., myama@ cs.tsukuba.ac.jp •{ } mutiyama, eiichiro.sumita @nict.go.jp ◦{ } Abstract An effective rule-based approach, head final- We propose a pre-reordering approach for ization has been proposed for English-to-Japanese Japanese-to-Chinese statistical machine translation (Isozaki et al., 2012). The approach translation (SMT). The approach uses de- takes advantage of the head final property of pendency structure and manually designed Japanese on the target-side. It designs a head fi- reordering rules to arrange morphemes of nalization rule to move the head word based on Japanese sentences into Chinese-like word the parsing result by a head-driven phrase struc- order, before a baseline phrase-based (PB) ture grammar (HPSG) parser. Generally, the idea SMT system applied. Experimental results can be applied to other SVO-to-Japanese transla- on the ASPEC-JC data show that the im- tion tasks, such as its application in Chinese-to- provement of the proposed pre-reordering Japanese translation (Dan et al., 2012). approach is slight on BLEU and mediocre However, the head finalization cannot be ap- on RIBES, compared with the organizer’s plied on the reverse translation task, i.e. Japanese- baseline PB SMT system. The approach to-SVO translation, which becomes a more diffi- also shows improvement in human evalu- cult task.
    [Show full text]
  • Finite Moods of a Verb 1. Indicative
    Finite Moods of a Verb 1. Indicative – The verb states a fact or asks a direct question. 2. Imperative – The verbs states a command. 3. Subjunctive – The verb states a possibility. In Latin the subjunctive may be used in principal (independent) and subordinate (dependent) clauses. It can express the ideas of command, purpose, result, indirect question, and the like, and the English translation must contain these ideas. Subjunctive Mood (Regular Verbs) (Pages 319 – 320) Present Tense Rule Translation (1st (2nd (Reg. (4th conj. conj.) conj.) 3rd conj.) & 3rd. io verbs) Pres. Rt. Pres. St. Pres. Rt. Pres. St. (may) voc mone reg capi audi + e + PE + a + PE + a + PE + a + PE (call) (warn) (rule) (take) (hear) vocem moneam regam capiam audiam I may ________ voces moneas regas capias audias you may ________ vocet moneat regat capiat audiat he may ________ vocemus moneamus regamus capiamus audiamus we may ________ vocetis moneatis regatis capiatis audiatis you may ________ vocent moneant regant capiant audiant they may ________ Subjunctive Mood (Irregular Verbs) (Pages 319 – 320) Present Tense (Must be memorized) Translation Sum Possum volo eo fero fio (may) (be) (be able) (wish) (go) (bring) (become) sim possim velim eam feram fiam I may ________ sis possis velis eas feras fias you may ________ sit possit velit eat ferat fiat he may ________ simus possimus velimus eamus feramus fiamus we may ________ sitis possitis velitis eatis feratis fiatis you may ________ sint possint velint eant ferant fiant they may ________ Subjunctive Mood (Regular Verbs)
    [Show full text]