Patrimonialism, Power and the Politics of Judicial Reform in Post-Soeharto Indonesia: an Institutional Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Patrimonialism, Power and the Politics of Judicial Reform in Post-Soeharto Indonesia: an Institutional Analysis Tahyar, Benjamin H. (2012) Patrimonialism, power and the politics of judicial reform in post‐ Soeharto Indonesia: an institutional analysis. PhD Thesis. http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/15945 Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non‐commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this thesis, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", name of the School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination. Patrimonialism, Power and The Politics of Judicial Reform in Post-Soeharto Indonesia: An Institutional Analysis Benjamin H. Tahyar Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD in Law 2012 Department of Law School of Oriental and African Studies University of London Abstract The increasingly voluminous literature on judicial reform in developing coun- tries typically takes little account of the resistance that local elites mount against the reforms as an explanation of why these reforms often fail. In the small number of in- stances where elite resistance is taken into account, it is treated as a black box, and very little effort is made to analyze the issue of why the elites have an interest in resist- ing the reforms. This thesis contributes to the literature by explicitly examining the interests of Indonesia’s elites in resisting the judicial reforms instituted since the downfall of the Soeharto dictatorship and the reintroduction of democracy. By using institutional theory, the thesis examines the patrimonial basis of elite power in Indone- sia and concludes that the ‘rule of law’ and constitutionalism required by the reforms is fundamentally antithetical to the ‘rule of discretion’ so necessary to patrimonialism. It is shown that the Reformasi movement that led to Soeharto’s downfall in 1998 did not result in the destruction of patrimonial rule and the displacement of the country’s core group of elites. The continuity of the patrimonial basis of power during the post- Soeharto period has therefore made reception of the rule of law and constitutionalism exceedingly problematic. The thesis first closely analyzes the informal institutional underpinnings of pat- rimonial power—corruption and the rule of discretion—under Soeharto’s dictatorship to expose the reasons why the regime intentionally rendered the country’s judicial sys- tem dysfunctional. Next, the thesis explores Reformasi and concludes that what actu- ally happened to bring down Soeharto’s dictatorship has many of the earmarks of a soft coup orchestrated by elements of the elite, especially the military, and bears little resemblance to the social revolutions normally associated with massive and fundamen- tal institutional changes. The thesis then examines the key reform initiative intended to restore the independence of the judiciary and concludes that this initiative has large- ly failed. The next two chapters show that some reform initiatives—the Constitutional Court and the Anti-Corruption Court—can be considered successful but conclude that in the case of the Constitutional Court such success must be qualified due to the Court’s limited jurisdictional reach that excludes large portions of laws from its pur- view, and that the Anti-Corruption Court, precisely because it has been successful, is now under attack by the elites. The thesis also concludes that the Commercial Court failed because it directly threatened the institutional basis of patrimonial rule. The 3 overall conclusion drawn by the thesis is that the rule of law and constitutionalism can only be established by Indonesia’s political-economic elites who must be prepared to spend substantial economic and political resources to capture the state and impose their goals upon the rest of society. To the extent that the political-economic elites remain tethered to the institutional underpinnings of patrimonial rule, the prospects for the rule of law and constitutionalism will remain largely unfulfilled. 4 Contents Page Declaration for PhD Thesis ............................................................................................. 2 Abstract ........................................................................................................................... 3 Abbreviations/Glossary................................................................................................... 6 Table of Interviews ......................................................................................................... 9 Table of Cases ............................................................................................................... 11 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 13 2. Dysfunctional by Design: The Indonesian Judiciary Under the New Order ....................................................................................................................... 25 3. Downfall of the New Order and Reformasi: Implications for the Negara Hukum ........................................................................................................ 67 4. Satu Atap and Judicial Independence: Distinguishing Between Form and Substance........................................................................................................ 100 5. Constitutionalism, Judicial Review, and the Mahkamah Konstitusi: Treating Human Rights Seriously? ....................................................................... 164 6. Corruption and Bankruptcy: A Tale of Two Courts ............................................ 207 7. Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 251 Bibliography ............................................................................................................... 258 5 Abbreviations/Glossary ABRI ......................................Angkatan Bersenjata Republik Indonesia (name used for the Indonesian Armed Forces before Reformasi). AICC ......................................American-Indonesian Chamber of Commerce, a non- profit organization, headquartered in New York City, es- tablished to promote better business ties between Ameri- can companies and the Indonesian government. Bappenas ................................Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (National Development Planning Agency), a cabinet-level agency of the Indonesian government. BLBI ......................................Bantuan Likuiditas Bank Indonesia (Bank Indonesia Li- quidity Assistance), liquidity assistance given by the In- donesian Central Bank to a number of distressed banks during the Asian financial crisis. DPD........................................Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (Regional Representatives Council), DPR ........................................Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (People’s Representative Council), the Indonesian National Parliament. GBHN ....................................Garis-Garis Besar Haluan Negara (Broad Outlines of State Policy), issued by the MPR on a five-yearly basis as a guide to national policy planning; no longer issued post-Reformasi. IBRA ......................................Indonesian Bank Restructuring Agency, an Indonesian government agency established in the wake of the Asian financial crisis to deal with the assets of distressed banks; abolished on ___________. ICW ........................................Indonesia Corruption Watch, an NGO established by LBH to keep track and publicize instances of corruption. IFIs .........................................International Financial Institutions, name used to denote a multilateral financial institution, such as the IMF. IMF ........................................International Monetary Fund. Kostrad ...................................Komando Strategis Cadangan Angkatan Darat (Army Strategic Reserve), an elite unit of the Indonesian army, consisting of between 35,000 and 40,000 men divided into several infantry and airborne brigades as well as field artillery regiments. KPK........................................Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (Corruption Eradication Commission), an independent agency of the Indonesian 6 government established to investigate and prosecute cas- es of corruption. KRHN ....................................Konsorsium Reformasi Hukum Nasional (Consortium for National Legal Reform), an NGO established by LBH to promote legal reform in Indonesia. LBH........................................Lembaga Bantuan Hukum (Legal Aid Institute), an NGO established by Adnan Buyung Nasution to provide legal assistance to indigent defendants. LeIP ........................................Lembaga Kajian dan Advokasi untuk Independensi Peradilan (Indonesian Institute for an Independent Judi- ciary), an NGO established to promote judicial inde- pendence in Indonesia. MaPPI-FHUI ..........................Masyarakat Pemantau Peradilan Indonesia—Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, a judicial watch NGO es- tablished by the Faculty of Laws of the University of In- donesia. MPR .......................................Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat
Recommended publications
  • 22 BAB II PEMBENTUKAN KABINET HATTA I A. Kondisi Politik Sebelum
    BAB II PEMBENTUKAN KABINET HATTA I A. Kondisi Politik Sebelum Kabinet Hatta I Periode revolusi fisik tahun 1945 sampai 1950 dalam Pemerintah Republik Indonesia identik dengan jatuh bangunnya kabinet. Menurut Herbert Feith, jatuh bangunnya kabinet ketika itu karena pemimpin sentral Republik Indonesia terpecah mengenai berbagai aspek dari pandangan dan persepsi mengenai Republik Indonesia dan dunia. Dalam bidang politik luar negeri, persaingan antar elit terjadi di seputar dua pertanyaan, yaitu; pertama, bagaimana menghadapi Belanda; dan kedua, persoalan perumusan identitas internasional Republik Indonesia. Mengenai yang pertama, pemerintah Republik Indonesia menghadapi tekanan politik yang amat kuat dalam perundingan dengan Belanda. Mengenai yang kedua, para elit bersaing, yang terpecah dalam garis politik dan ideologi, serta berbeda pandangan dalam konteks bipolarisme dunia.1 Dari argumen Herbert Feith dapat diuraikan beberapa contoh peristiwa sebagai berikut: 1. Tekanan Politik Belanda dalam Perundingan. Pada tanggal 17 Maret 1946 Sutan Syahrir mengajukan satu usul kompromi dengan memberikan konsesi yang tak sesuai dengan ikrar proklamasi.2 Salah satunya adalah pengakuan secara de facto Republik Indonesia atas Jawa dan Sumatra oleh Belanda. Hal ini mengakibatkan 1 Ganewati Wuryandari, Dharurodin Mashad, Tri Nuke Pujiastuti, dkk, Politik Luar Negeri Indonesia di Tengah Pusaran Politik Domestik, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2008, hlm. 67 - 68. 2 Adam Malik, Mengabdi Republik Jilid II: Angkatan 45, Jakarta: Gunung Agung, 1984, hlm. 163. 22 23 pertentangan berbagai golongan mengenai hasil Perjanjian Linggarjati terutama para pengikut Tan Malaka dalam Persatuan Perjuangan.3 Pada malam hari tanggal 27 Juni 1946 Sutan Syahrir ditangkap oleh satuan - satuan tentara di Surakarta dalam perjalanan keliling ke Jawa Timur. Penangkapan Sutan Syahrir ini diharapkan akan memungkinkan Dwitunggal memberikan kemerdekaan 100 persen.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia Beyond Reformasi: Necessity and the “De-Centering” of Democracy
    INDONESIA BEYOND REFORMASI: NECESSITY AND THE “DE-CENTERING” OF DEMOCRACY Leonard C. Sebastian, Jonathan Chen and Adhi Priamarizki* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION: TRANSITIONAL POLITICS IN INDONESIA ......................................... 2 R II. NECESSITY MAKES STRANGE BEDFELLOWS: THE GLOBAL AND DOMESTIC CONTEXT FOR DEMOCRACY IN INDONESIA .................... 7 R III. NECESSITY-BASED REFORMS ................... 12 R A. What Necessity Inevitably Entailed: Changes to Defining Features of the New Order ............. 12 R 1. Military Reform: From Dual Function (Dwifungsi) to NKRI ......................... 13 R 2. Taming Golkar: From Hegemony to Political Party .......................................... 21 R 3. Decentralizing the Executive and Devolution to the Regions................................. 26 R 4. Necessary Changes and Beyond: A Reflection .31 R IV. NON NECESSITY-BASED REFORMS ............. 32 R A. After Necessity: A Political Tug of War........... 32 R 1. The Evolution of Legislative Elections ........ 33 R 2. The Introduction of Direct Presidential Elections ...................................... 44 R a. The 2004 Direct Presidential Elections . 47 R b. The 2009 Direct Presidential Elections . 48 R 3. The Emergence of Direct Local Elections ..... 50 R V. 2014: A WATERSHED ............................... 55 R * Leonard C. Sebastian is Associate Professor and Coordinator, Indonesia Pro- gramme at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, S. Rajaratnam School of In- ternational Studies, Nanyang Technological University,
    [Show full text]
  • Trade-Offs, Compromise and Democratization in a Post-Authoritarian Setting
    Asian Social Science; Vol. 8, No. 13; 2012 ISSN 1911-2017 E-ISSN 1911-2025 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Trade-offs, Compromise and Democratization in a Post-authoritarian Setting Paul James Carnegie1 1 Department of International Studies, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates Correspondence: Paul James Carnegie, Department of International Studies, American University of Sharjah, University City, Sharjah 26666, United Arab Emirates. Tel: 971-6-515-4703. E-mail: [email protected] Received: June 17, 2012 Accepted: July 5, 2012 Online Published: October 18, 2012 doi:10.5539/ass.v8n13p71 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n13p71 Abstract Reconstituting the disarticulated political space of authoritarian breakdown is anything but straightforward. Distinct trade-offs and ambiguous outcomes are all too familiar. This is in no small part because political change involves compromise with an authoritarian past. The very fact of this transition dynamic leaves us with more questions than answers about the process of democratization. In particular, it is important to ask how we go about interpreting ambiguity in the study of democratization. The following article argues that the way we frame democratization is struggling to come to terms with the ambiguity of contemporary political change. Taking Indonesia as an example, the article maps a tension between authoritarianism and subsequent democratization. The story here is not merely one of opening, breakthrough, and consolidation but also (re-)negotiation. There is also an unfolding at the interstices of culture and politics and of that between discourse and practice. Unfortunately, the insight gained will not lessen some of the more undesirable aspects of Indonesia’s post-authoritarian outcome but it does afford us a more fine-grained reading of the reconfigured patterns of politics that are emerging.
    [Show full text]
  • And During the (1998-Reformasi Era (1998—2006)
    CHAPTER IV OPPORTUNISTIC SUBALTERN’S NEGOTIATIONS DURING THE NEW ORDER ERA (1974-1998) AND DURING THE (1998-REFORMASI ERA (1998—2006) What happened in West Kalimantan from early 1998 to 2006 was a distorted mirror image of what happened in Jakarta from early 1997 to 2004 (the return of the former government party Golkar, or at least its pro-development/anti-poor policies, to national politics). The old power, conveniently setting up scapegoats and places to hide, returned slowly and inconspicuously to the political theater. On the Indonesian Armed Forces (ABRI, or Angkatan Bersenjata Republik Indonesia) anniversary on 5 October 1999, its Supreme Commander General Wiranto, a protégé of former president Suharto, published a book that outlined the new, formal policy of the Armed Forces (entitled “ABRI Abad XXI: Redefinisi, Reposisi, dan Reaktualisasi Peran ABRI dalam Kehidupan Bangsa” or Indonesian Armed Forces 21st Century: Redefinition, Reposition, and Re-actualization of its Role in the Nation’s Life). Two of the most important changes heralded by the book were first, a new commitment by the Armed Forces (changed from ABRI to TNI, or Tentara Nasional Indonesia, Indonesian National Soldier) to detach itself from politics, political parties and general elections and second, the eradication of some suppressive agencies related to civic rules and liberties1. 1 Despite claims of its demise when the Berlin Wall was dismantled in 1989, the Cold War had always been the most influential factor within the Indonesian Armed Forces’ doctrines. At the “end of the Cold War” in 1989, the Indonesia Armed Forces invoked a doctrine related to the kewaspadaan (a rather paranoid sense of danger) to counter the incoming openness (glastnost) in Eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Gerlndra Berkomltmen Bangun Desa
    PEMILU 2014 DIKLAT CALEG VANIA LARISSA Partai Gerindra: PARTAI GERINDRA Mengubah Hidup KPU Agar Cermat Prabowo Subianto: Menyusun DPT Jadilah Pejuang Politik GEMA UTAMA>>04 INDONESIA >>06 FIGUR >>13 GEMA TERBIT 16 HALAMAN/EDISI 31/TAHUN III/NOVEMBER 2013 Indonesiawww.partaigerindra.or.id Raya GELORA HAK KONSTITUSIONAL RAKYAT DIKEBIRI OLEH FADLI ZON DALAM Badan Legislasi DPR, Fraksi Partai Demokrat, Partai Golkar, PDIP, PAN, dan PKB sepakat RUU Pilpres tak dibahas lagi. Fraksi lainnya, termasuk Gerindra, tetap menginginkan revisi UU Pilpres. Sidang paripurna DPR akhirnya memutuskan menghentikan pembahasan. Sehingga ambang presidential threshold (PT) tetap 20 persen perolehan kursi DPR atau 25 perolehan suara nasional. Angka PT 20 persen, patut dipertanyakan. Dalam UUD 1945 pasal 6, tak diamanatkan penetapan ambang batas. Konstitusi hanya menyebutkan pasangan presiden – wapres diajukan oleh partai politik atau gabungan parpol. Sehingga penetapan PT 20 persen jelas berlawanan dengan konstitusi. Partai Gerindra tak khawatir angka PT 20 persen. Namun ini merupakan cermin permainan oligarki partai yang bertentangan FO dengan semangat demokrasi. Ada kepentingan subyektif jangka T O F pendek partai tertentu. Keputusan ini juga bertentangan dengan ACE hak setiap warga negara untuk memilih dan dipilih. Oligarki partai BOO mengebiri hak konstitusional warga negara untuk mencalonkan diri K.C O sebagai presiden atau wapres. Ini membatasi potensi munculnya M/ G pasangan capres-cawapres terbaik bagi bangsa. ERINDRA Partai Gerindra menginginkan PT sesuai parliamentary threshold sehingga semakin banyak sajian alternatif pasangan capres – cawapres. Biarlah rakyat yang memilih. Selain UU Pilpres, hak konstitusional rakyat juga dicederai PRABOWO SUBIANTO persoalan daftar pemilih tetap (DPT). Di era globalisasi yang penuh kemajuan teknologi, seharusnya masalah DPT tak mungkin ada.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudargo Gautama and the Development of Indonesian Public Order: a Study on the Application of Public Order Doctrine in a Pluralistic Legal System
    Sudargo Gautama and the Development of Indonesian Public Order: A Study on the Application of Public Order Doctrine in a Pluralistic Legal System Yu Un Oppusunggu A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2015 Reading Committee: John O. Haley, Chair Michael E. Townsend Beth E. Rivin Program Authorized to Offer Degree School of Law © Copyright 2015 Yu Un Oppusunggu ii University of Washington Abstract Sudargo Gautama and the Development of Indonesian Public Order: A Study on the Application of Public Order Doctrine in a Pluralistic Legal System Yu Un Oppusunggu Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor John O. Haley School of Law A sweeping proviso that protects basic or fundamental interests of a legal system is known in various names – ordre public, public policy, public order, government’s interest or Vorbehaltklausel. This study focuses on the concept of Indonesian public order in private international law. It argues that Indonesia has extraordinary layers of pluralism with respect to its people, statehood and law. Indonesian history is filled with the pursuit of nationhood while protecting diversity. The legal system has been the unifying instrument for the nation. However the selected cases on public order show that the legal system still lacks in coherence. Indonesian courts have treated public order argument inconsistently. A prima facie observation may find Indonesian public order unintelligible, and the courts have gained notoriety for it. This study proposes a different perspective. It sees public order in light of Indonesia’s legal pluralism and the stages of legal development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Military Reform in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Elite Conflict, Nationalism, and Institutional Resistance
    Policy Studies 23 The Politics of Military Reform in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Elite Conflict, Nationalism, and Institutional Resistance Marcus Mietzner East-West Center Washington East-West Center The East-West Center is an internationally recognized education and research organization established by the U.S. Congress in 1960 to strengthen understanding and relations between the United States and the countries of the Asia Pacific. Through its programs of cooperative study, training, seminars, and research, the Center works to promote a stable, peaceful, and prosperous Asia Pacific community in which the United States is a leading and valued partner. Funding for the Center comes from the U.S. government, private foundations, individuals, cor- porations, and a number of Asia Pacific governments. East-West Center Washington Established on September 1, 2001, the primary function of the East- West Center Washington is to further the East-West Center mission and the institutional objective of building a peaceful and prosperous Asia Pacific community through substantive programming activities focused on the theme of conflict reduction, political change in the direction of open, accountable, and participatory politics, and American understanding of and engagement in Asia Pacific affairs. The Politics of Military Reform in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Elite Conflict, Nationalism, and Institutional Resistance Policy Studies 23 ___________ The Politics of Military Reform in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Elite Conflict, Nationalism, and Institutional Resistance _____________________ Marcus Mietzner Copyright © 2006 by the East-West Center Washington The Politics of Military Reform in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Elite Conflict, Nationalism, and Institutional Resistance by Marcus Mietzner ISBN 978-1-932728-45-3 (online version) ISSN 1547-1330 (online version) Online at: www.eastwestcenterwashington.org/publications East-West Center Washington 1819 L Street, NW, Suite 200 Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Land- ​ En Volkenkunde
    Music of the Baduy People of Western Java Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal- , Land- en Volkenkunde Edited by Rosemarijn Hoefte (kitlv, Leiden) Henk Schulte Nordholt (kitlv, Leiden) Editorial Board Michael Laffan (Princeton University) Adrian Vickers (The University of Sydney) Anna Tsing (University of California Santa Cruz) volume 313 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ vki Music of the Baduy People of Western Java Singing is a Medicine By Wim van Zanten LEIDEN | BOSTON This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC BY- NC- ND 4.0 license, which permits any non- commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided no alterations are made and the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https:// creativecommons.org/ licenses/ by- nc- nd/ 4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder. Cover illustration: Front: angklung players in Kadujangkung, Kanékés village, 15 October 1992. Back: players of gongs and xylophone in keromong ensemble at circumcision festivities in Cicakal Leuwi Buleud, Kanékés, 5 July 2016. Translations from Indonesian, Sundanese, Dutch, French and German were made by the author, unless stated otherwise. The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at http://catalog.loc.gov LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2020045251 Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Warring Words'
    ‘Warring Words’: Students and the state in New Order Indonesia, 1966-1998 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the Australian National University. Elisabeth Jackson Southeast Asia Centre Faculty of Asian Studies June 2005 CERTIFICATION I, Elisabeth Jackson, declare that this thesis, submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy at the Australian National University, is wholly my own work unless otherwise referenced or acknowledged. It has not been submitted for qualifications at any other academic institution. …………………………. Elisabeth Jackson 3 June 2005 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I have been incredibly fortunate to have the support of a great many wonderful people throughout the course of researching and writing this thesis. First and foremost, I would like to thank Virginia Hooker for her enthusiasm for this project and her faith in my ability to do it. Her thoughtful criticisms gently steered me in the right direction and made it possible for me to see the bigger picture. I also owe enormous thanks to Ed Aspinall, who encouraged me to tackle this project in the first place and supported me throughout my candidature. He was also an invaluable source of expertise on student activism and the politics of the New Order and his extensive comments on my drafts enabled me to push my ideas further. Virginia and Ed also provided me with opportunities to try my hand at teaching. Tim Hassall’s considered comments on the linguistic aspects of this thesis challenged me to think in new ways about Indonesian language and helped to strengthen the thesis considerably.
    [Show full text]
  • 6157 Tapols Held on Plantations
    Tapol bulletin no, 31, Dec-Jan 1978-9 This is the Published version of the following publication UNSPECIFIED (1978) Tapol bulletin no, 31, Dec-Jan 1978-9. Tapol bulletin (31). pp. 1-16. ISSN 1356-1154 The publisher’s official version can be found at Note that access to this version may require subscription. Downloaded from VU Research Repository https://vuir.vu.edu.au/26380/ British Campaign for the Release of Indonesian Political Prisoners TAPOL Bulletin No 31 Dec-Jan 1978-9 6157 Tapols Held on Plantations A total of 6,157 men officially described as "released for many years been engaged in the practice of sending Category-C political prisoners" from Central and East 'released' prisoners as forced labour to work in conditions Java are being held as forced labour on State-owned and of captivity. It confirms that there are far more political military-run plantations in North Sumatra and Aceh. They prisoners being held than the 10,239 officially acknowledged are among 18,000 contract labourers all of whom are being after the reported release of 10,005 prisoners in 1978. held against their will at the plantations. It confirms moreover that thousands of Cate_gory-C This is reported by two Jakarta newspapers Merdeka and prisoners are still being held despite government claims that Kompas (21 October, 1978) which said that the men had all people in this category were freed by 1972. Reports signed 5-year contracts, in some cases as long as 10 or 15 received in the past that prisoners were being used on plan­ years ago, but had been unable to return home after their tations have now been confirmed indisputably, but it is not contracts expired because the employers failed to buy them possible to estimate how many people are involved.
    [Show full text]
  • A National Mental Revolution
    A NATIONAL MENTAL REVOLUTION THROUGH THE RESTORATION OF CITIES OF COLONIAL LEGACY: TOWARDS BUILDING A STRONG NATION’S CHARACTER An Urban Cultural Historical and Bio Psychosocial Overview By Martono Yuwono and Krishnahari S. Pribadi, MD *) “We shape our buildings; thereafter they shape us” --- (Sir Winston Churchill). “The young generation does not realize how hard and difficult it was when Indonesia struggled for our independence throughout three hundred years of colonization. They have to learn thoroughly from our history and to use the experiences and leadership of the older generations, as guidance and role models. They have to understand about our national identity. When they do not know their national’s identity, where would they go?” (Ali Sadikin’s statement as interviewed by Express Magazine, June 1, 1973, and several times discussions with Martono Yuwono) “Majapahit", a strong maritime nation in the 14th century The history of Indonesia as a maritime nation dates back to the 14th century when this South East Asian region was subjected under the reign of the great “Majapahit” Empire. The Empire ruled a region which is geographically located between two great continents namely Asia and Australia, and at the same time between two great oceans namely the Pacific and the Indian oceans. This region consisted of mainly the archipelagic group of islands (which is now referred to as Indonesia), and some portion of the coastal region at the south eastern tip of the Asian continent. “Majapahit” was already the largest archipelagic state in the world at that time, in control of the strategic cross roads (sea lanes) between those two great continents and two great oceans.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Indonesian National Democratic Institutions and Compatibility with Its National Culture
    The development of Indonesian national democratic institutions and compatibility with its national culture. 1 Master thesis Degree Public Administration Track Administration and Politics Institute Tilburg University Author D. Schoofs Administration number 759809 E-mail address [email protected] Date 23-02-2016 Supervision prof. dr. F. Hendriks Primary supervisor Tilburg University dr. A. Maleki Secondary supervisor Tilburg University 2 On the cover: Monumen Nasional (Monas), the national monument of the Republic of Indonesia. A 132m tower in the centre of Merdeka Square in Central Jakarta, build to commemorate the struggle for Indonesian independence. To me, it symbolises the first acquaintance of Indonesia with building a democratic state: The short democratic experience, right before Sukarno’s Guided Democracy. As you can see, the picture on the cover is still quite blurry. After a long period of harsh ruling, Indonesia is granted a second chance in building a democratic state. During my brief time in Jakarta, I met many people who still struggle, every day, in pursuit of their democracy. My hope is that they will continue to do so and that their democracy will be proven solid, casted in bronze as it were, as reflected by the second picture. Separated by many miles. My thoughts are with you and continue to be. Tilburg University. Frans Seda Foundation. Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya. Indonesia Mengajar. Perludem. prof. dr. F. Hendriks. dr. A. Maleki. dr. T. Metze. Mr. Jaap van Gent. Mr. Dolf Huijgers. dr. Mikhael Dua. dr. E. Widodo. Mr. S. Simarmata. Ms. A. Dwifatma. Mr. A.M. Alizar. Ms. K.D.
    [Show full text]