DOCSLIB.ORG

Part 4, Central Siberia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Part 4, Central Siberia WA R D E P RTME T A N , M D OCU EN T No . 863 . OFFI CE O F CH I EF O F ST A FF . Th ere are c op ies of th is p ublic ation . Th is c op y is assigned to ADDITI ONS AN D C ORRECTION S . I N S T RUCT I O N S F OR USE OF B LAN K P AGES I N H AN DB OOK . A t the end of th i s hook bl ank sp ace s a r e p rovi d ed f or new o r suppl e n h n m en t ary i fo r m ation. T ey ar e h eaded A dditi on s and C or rec ti o s . Offi cer s obt ai ni ng suc h i nfor m ati on a r e i ns t r u c ted to t ran smi t it a t onc e h n dd r a on r h r to t e foll owi g a ess : Milit ry M og ap Sfib section , Milita y D iv i n ner f h n n D n e enc e is o e a S a W as o . I t llig . G l t f, i gt , C Offi cer s sh ould rem ember t h a t s eemingly small bit s of i nfor m a ti on r m a b e of r ea a e. F or exam e th en h f r d e th e n m e : y g t v lu p l , e l gt o a b i g , u b h n a h n m e r r n of ou ses i a vill ge , t e a of a good guide a e each wo th n oti g and t ran smitti ng to Washi ngt on. R T — NT AL PA 4 , CE R SIBE I R A . TABLE O F CON TEN TS . — RO UT E L . OMSK T O CHELYA B INSK : List of stations General description Detailed description Petropavlovsk o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o Chelyab insk M — H LY B K T R OUTE . C E A I N S O SYZ RAN : Lis t of stations General desc ription D etailed desc ription Branch l oIetayevo to Kustanai T roitsk Verkhn e - Uralsk o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o B erdyansh a r Vy zovaya . B anch to Tir land . Ufa Buguruslan — Branch Z Krotovka to Surgut Samara Batraki . Bridge over the Volga . Sy zran N —M K T : RO UTE . O S O VYATKA List of stations General d esc ription D etailed desc ription o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o Yalutorovsk 7978 21 4 TAB L E OF CO NT ENT S . E MA K T - ROUT N O S O VYATKA Continued . — Detailed description Continued . Tyu men . Yekaterinburg ~ Branch 1 B ogdanovch to Shadrinsk General description Detailed description k Sinars aya . Shadrinsk Branch 2—Yekaterinburg to Irbit Irbit Bilimb ai Glazov Vyatka — RO UTE P YEKATE RIN B U R G T O PE R M V I A N I Z H N I -T AGIL List of stations General description . Detailed descrip tion N evynsk P - N v rk - ost road , ei insk to Ve h ne Tagil N izh ni- Tagil Biser — B ran c h 1 N izh ni- Tagil to Alatay evsk — Branc h Q Goroblagodatskaya to Shakh ta v ia N a d ezhdinski Verkhoturye — l ' B ranch 3 Chusovskaya to So evarm . — R O UTE Q CHELYA B INSK T O YE K AT E RI N B UR G Z List of stations General desc ription Detailed desc ription Mramorskaya WA G O N R O A DT OM SK T O PE RM General description . D etailed description . TAB LE OF CO NT ENT S . RO UTE S I N THE KH mGH I z ST E PP E General descri tion —p— Rou te W l Petropavlovsk to Uspenski Mine Detailed description Sara Su Uspenski —Z— ar- al Route W Pavlodar to K Kar ins k . —— Route W 3 Kh ak - Chan to Akmolinsk Via B ayandi Kuduk—. — Rou te W 4 B ayan to Aul - Karagand y Coal Mine — — fi Rou tes W 5 and W G Kar- K aralinsk to Karagandy and Uspenski —— Route W 7 Petropavlovsk to Jusali — R O UT E S UFA T O SI MB R I SK : List of stations General description Detail ed description Simbrisk OMS K T O CHELYABIN S K . 5 3 s e e « e z & a a 3 a a m 5 m d o 5 S o 2flm é 3 o Q z é m 3 g 6 m fi b o 2fi q i d e z o m s g m Q ‘ m o 0 o fi m5 m m m o fip m o m E l m mE é 4 m$ q g 5 g m o E é o fi m fi m mm m 5 m2 m m mm z 5 o o zo m Ea o fi y S éw éw 8 5 fi5 a fim x m z o p 8 9 2 : m s 5 fi x 5 a o c m o 5 5 s b 8 fiw m h m o 8 M T O SK O CHELYABINSK . s a o e g a m m 5 é a 3 o m Q o é o é A é Q mQ d m H n d E q m fi q é N o d m i m m m 5 m m mm m b x a m n m m i m u 5 m m fi P m m m o c fi x é é fi m 2 é a m f Q d é o m m m m m m m m m m m m o fi fi5 a o m fl d fi g m fimfi smx 9 m mfin fi Em ém 2 g 0 o A A o s x s m o m k mk x a fi fi fl m m x fi a a fi s m m w a m w d fi wm o g m E d w w g E h g w fi e a E w E % E fi fi g s —fl s E m s a g E f E ;E m w d ? wx m s fi M m w w cN m . z N 6 H fi : 10 M O S K T O C HE LYABINS K . h a e a s é © e Q é g a a m m m a d 5 o g o 2 . o Q a mm5 m a < $ m 8 u m m o a o M m q fi s mm5 m $ 5 m m8 mm m” E fl 0 fi 9 fi é 5 fi m a 5 2 m m ? > m m m m g8 5 o fim fio z em E 5 mfi?m r o é h i o x a q a fi w m h s e o 9 mt fl o g fi S a m é > a fi 9 z . p fi m fi . a 9 m m 6 a m m m m m s w w d m a a 3 a m fi w e fi g b fla q 8 5 d fi § 3 q u o 3 x % m fi b fi z e o e g fi 3 o 5 2 z g a s a 5 §5 q z § i ~v w a w s g m fi w 0 m 0 ? 5 d o g w 5 m 8 A 6 A fl : m N “ RO E UT L . TRAN S - SIBERI AN RAILROAD—OMSK T O H C ELYABINSK. 4 9 m r ( 5 il es, 746 v e s t s . ) GEN ERAL DESCRIPTION . GENERAL CON D IT ION . R oute L i s pa rt of the branch of the T ra ns - Siberia n R ai lway M wh ich runs to oscow . T h e region through which i t pa sses i s fi l s one of the great granaries a nd grazi ng e d of Siberia . I t i s r A a lso a s densely popu la ted a s a ny othe part . t the weste r n i end t enters the mi neral region of the Ura l s . N r ume ou s carava n routes from the sou th j oi n the rail road . especi ally at Petropavlovsk a nd Kurgan .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History of Radiation and Nuclear Disasters in the Former USSR
    History of radiation and nuclear disasters in the former USSR M.V.Malko Institute of Power Engineering National Academy of Sciences of Belarus Akademicheskaya Str.15, Minsk, 220 000, Republic of Belarus E-mail: [email protected] Abstracts. The report describes the history of radiation and nuclear accidents in the former USSR. These accidents accompanied development of military and civilian use of nuclear energy. Some of them as testing of the first Soviet nuclear, Kyshtym radiation accident, radiation contamination of the Karachai lake and the Techa river, nuclear accidents at the Soviet submarine on August 10, 1985 in the Chazhma Bay (near Vladivostok) as well as nuclear accidents on April 26, 1986 at the Chernobyl NPP were of large scale causing significant radiological problems for many hundreds thousands of people. There were a number of important reasons of these and other accidents. The most important among them were time pressure by development of nuclear weapon, an absence of required financial and material means for adequate management of problems of nuclear and radiation safety, and inadequate understanding of harmful interaction of ionizing radiation on organism as well as a hypersecrecy by realization of projects of military and civilian use of nuclear energy in the former USSR. Introduction. The first nuclear reactor in the USSR reached the critical state on the 25 December 1946 [1] or 4 years later than reactor constructed by Enrico Fermi [2]. The first Soviet reactor was developed at the Laboratory N2 in Moscow (later I.V.Kurchatov Institute of Atomic Energy). This was a very important step in a realization of the Soviet military atomic program that began in September 1942.
    [Show full text]
  • Systemic Criteria for the Evaluation of the Role of Monofunctional Towns in the Formation of Local Urban Agglomerations
    ISSN 2007-9737 Systemic Criteria for the Evaluation of the Role of Monofunctional Towns in the Formation of Local Urban Agglomerations Pavel P. Makagonov1, Lyudmila V. Tokun2, Liliana Chanona Hernández3, Edith Adriana Jiménez Contreras4 1 Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Russia 2 State University of Management, Finance and Credit Department, Russia 3 Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica, Mexico 4 Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Cómputo, Mexico [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. There exist various federal and regional monotowns do not possess any distinguishing self- programs aimed at solving the problem of organization peculiarities in comparison to other monofunctional towns in the periods of economic small towns. stagnation and structural unemployment occurrence. Nevertheless, people living in such towns can find Keywords. Systemic analysis, labor migration, labor solutions to the existing problems with the help of self- market, agglomeration process criterion, self- organization including diurnal labor commuting migration organization of monotown population. to the nearest towns with a more stable economic situation. This accounts for the initial reason for agglomeration processes in regions with a large number 1 Introduction of monotowns. Experimental models of the rank distribution of towns in a system (region) and evolution In this paper, we discuss the problems of criteria of such systems from basic ones to agglomerations are explored in order to assess the monotown population using as an example several intensity of agglomeration processes in the systems of monotowns located in Siberia (Russia). In 2014 the towns in the Middle and Southern Urals (the Sverdlovsk Government of the Russian Federation issued two and Chelyabinsk regions of Russia).
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Indutry of Russia in 1998
    THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF RUSSIA By Richard M. Levine Russia extends over more than 75% of the territory of the According to the Minister of Natural Resources, Russia will former Soviet Union (FSU) and accordingly possesses a large not begin to replenish diminishing reserves until the period from percentage of the FSU’s mineral resources. Russia was a major 2003 to 2005, at the earliest. Although some positive trends mineral producer, accounting for a large percentage of the were appearing during the 1996-97 period, the financial crisis in FSU’s production of a range of mineral products, including 1998 set the geological sector back several years as the minimal aluminum, bauxite, cobalt, coal, diamonds, mica, natural gas, funding that had been available for exploration decreased nickel, oil, platinum-group metals, tin, and a host of other further. In 1998, 74% of all geologic prospecting was for oil metals, industrial minerals, and mineral fuels. Still, Russia was and gas (Interfax Mining and Metals Report, 1999n; Novikov significantly import-dependent on a number of mineral products, and Yastrzhembskiy, 1999). including alumina, bauxite, chromite, manganese, and titanium Lack of funding caused a deterioration of capital stock at and zirconium ores. The most significant regions of the country mining enterprises. At the majority of mining enterprises, there for metal mining were East Siberia (cobalt, copper, lead, nickel, was a sharp decrease in production indicators. As a result, in the columbium, platinum-group metals, tungsten, and zinc), the last 7 years more than 20 million metric tons (Mt) of capacity Kola Peninsula (cobalt, copper, nickel, columbium, rare-earth has been decommissioned at iron ore mining enterprises.
    [Show full text]
  • Chelyabinsk Airburst, Damage Assessment, Meteorite Recovery and Characterization
    O. P. Popova, et al., Chelyabinsk Airburst, Damage Assessment, Meteorite Recovery and Characterization. Science 342 (2013). Chelyabinsk Airburst, Damage Assessment, Meteorite Recovery, and Characterization Olga P. Popova1, Peter Jenniskens2,3,*, Vacheslav Emel'yanenko4, Anna Kartashova4, Eugeny Biryukov5, Sergey Khaibrakhmanov6, Valery Shuvalov1, Yurij Rybnov1, Alexandr Dudorov6, Victor I. Grokhovsky7, Dmitry D. Badyukov8, Qing-Zhu Yin9, Peter S. Gural2, Jim Albers2, Mikael Granvik10, Läslo G. Evers11,12, Jacob Kuiper11, Vladimir Kharlamov1, Andrey Solovyov13, Yuri S. Rusakov14, Stanislav Korotkiy15, Ilya Serdyuk16, Alexander V. Korochantsev8, Michail Yu. Larionov7, Dmitry Glazachev1, Alexander E. Mayer6, Galen Gisler17, Sergei V. Gladkovsky18, Josh Wimpenny9, Matthew E. Sanborn9, Akane Yamakawa9, Kenneth L. Verosub9, Douglas J. Rowland19, Sarah Roeske9, Nicholas W. Botto9, Jon M. Friedrich20,21, Michael E. Zolensky22, Loan Le23,22, Daniel Ross23,22, Karen Ziegler24, Tomoki Nakamura25, Insu Ahn25, Jong Ik Lee26, Qin Zhou27, 28, Xian-Hua Li28, Qiu-Li Li28, Yu Liu28, Guo-Qiang Tang28, Takahiro Hiroi29, Derek Sears3, Ilya A. Weinstein7, Alexander S. Vokhmintsev7, Alexei V. Ishchenko7, Phillipe Schmitt-Kopplin30,31, Norbert Hertkorn30, Keisuke Nagao32, Makiko K. Haba32, Mutsumi Komatsu33, and Takashi Mikouchi34 (The Chelyabinsk Airburst Consortium). 1Institute for Dynamics of Geospheres of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospect 38, Building 1, Moscow, 119334, Russia. 2SETI Institute, 189 Bernardo Avenue, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA. 3NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Mail Stop 245-1, CA 94035, USA. 4Institute of Astronomy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Pyatnitskaya 48, Moscow, 119017, Russia. 5Department of Theoretical Mechanics, South Ural State University, Lenin Avenue 76, Chelyabinsk, 454080, Russia. 6Chelyabinsk State University, Bratyev Kashirinyh Street 129, Chelyabinsk, 454001, Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Modeling of the 2013 Meteorite Entry in Lake Chebarkul, Russia
    Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 671–683, 2017 www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/671/2017/ doi:10.5194/nhess-17-671-2017 © Author(s) 2017. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Numerical modeling of the 2013 meteorite entry in Lake Chebarkul, Russia Andrey Kozelkov1,2, Andrey Kurkin2, Efim Pelinovsky2,3, Vadim Kurulin1, and Elena Tyatyushkina1 1Russian Federal Nuclear Center, All-Russian Research Institute of Experimental Physics, Sarov, 607189, Russia 2Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University n. a. R. E. Alekseev, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russia 3Institute of Applied Physics, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russia Correspondence to: Andrey Kurkin ([email protected]) Received: 4 November 2016 – Discussion started: 4 January 2017 Revised: 1 April 2017 – Accepted: 13 April 2017 – Published: 11 May 2017 Abstract. The results of the numerical simulation of possi- Emel’yanenko et al., 2013; Popova et al., 2013; Berngardt et ble hydrodynamic perturbations in Lake Chebarkul (Russia) al., 2013; Gokhberg et al., 2013; Krasnov et al., 2014; Se- as a consequence of the meteorite fall of 2013 (15 Febru- leznev et al., 2013; De Groot-Hedlin and Hedlin, 2014): ary) are presented. The numerical modeling is based on the – the meteorite with a diameter of 16–19 m flew into the Navier–Stokes equations for a two-phase fluid. The results of ◦ the simulation of a meteorite entering the water at an angle earth’s atmosphere at about 20 to the horizon at a ve- ∼ −1 of 20◦ are given. Numerical experiments are carried out both locity of 17–22 km s . when the lake is covered with ice and when it is not.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Siberian Highway and Process Urbanization on Southern Ural (1891-1914 Years)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Siberian Federal University Digital Repository Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 2 (2009 2) 176-183 ~ ~ ~ УДК 908 Great Siberian Highway and Process Urbanization on Southern Ural (1891-1914 Years) Aleksandr A. Timofeev* South-Ural state university, 76 Lenin av., Chelyabinsk, 454080 Russia 1 Received 23.03.2009, received in revised form 30.03.2009, accepted 6.04.2009 There are considered urban population’s processes occurring on Southern Ural after construction of the Transsiberian railway (Transsib) at the end of XIX – the beginning of XX centuries in clause. The reasons of strengthening of the urbanization process , the increase of the urban population’s share on Southern Ural were growth of industry and trade, requirement for a cheap labour. Ufa, Zlatoust, Chelyabinsk cities, located along the Transsiberian railway, become the large railway stations. Keywords: Transsiberian railway, Southern Ural, urbanization, modernization. The considered period of 1891-1914 it is communication networks in the urbanized possible to characterize as an initial stage the territories. Modernization, «industrialization, urbanization’s transition of the Southern-Ural urbanization frequently proceed in interrelation». region. The essence of a urbanization consists In conditions of modernization of the end XIX – in territorial concentration of the human the beginnings XX centuries cities concentrated activity, conducting to the intensification and in themselves economic, administrative, differentiations down to allocation of new scientific, spiritual potential of all society. The city forms and spatial structures of population economic maintenance of modernization consists moving. Urban transition is qualitatively in development industrial, transport, trading, allocated, supreme stage of the urbanization’s financial-bank systems and other kinds of not process, which conducts to radical transformation agricultural branches.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Characterization of the Chelyabinsk Meteords Terminal
    ○E Seismic Characterization of the Chelyabinsk Meteor’s Terminal Explosion by Sebastian Heimann, Álvaro González, Rongjiang Wang, Simone Cesca, and Torsten Dahm Online Material: Figures of waveform fit, apparent source time explosion (airburst) of the meteor southwest of Chelyabinsk functions, and video of impact of shock wave at factory. city, and had an equivalent moment magnitude of 3.60. This implies that this is the second largest meteor explosion ever INTRODUCTION seismically recorded, only surpassed by the 1908 Tunguska event (Ben-Menahem, 1975). Impacts with our planet cause seismic shaking by a variety of mechanisms. Catastrophic ground motion, even at antipodal DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUND SHAKING distances, can be generated by the extremely infrequent, hyper- sonic collisions with large asteroids or comets (Meschede et al., The seismic ground shaking caused by the Chelyabinsk meteor 2011). Fortunately, the atmosphere effectively shields the was exceptionally well registered at planetary scale. It can be smaller (and far more common) meteoroids, greatly reducing observed in more than 70 digital, broadband seismic recordings their initial kinetic energy at high altitude, causing them to from stations located at least up to 4000 km away, sampling slow down, break up, and even vaporize, producing a meteor most azimuths. At further distances, the identification of the (Ceplecha and Revelle, 2005). In most instances, the ground meteor signal is hampered by the coincidental interference shaking is triggered by the atmospheric shock wave of a meteor, with wave arrivals from a tectonic earthquake with magnitude M not by the impact of the surviving meteorites (Edwards w 5.7, originated in Tonga at 03:02:23 UTC.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Investment Chelyabinsk Region Pwc Russia ( Provides Industry-Focused Assurance, Advisory, Tax and Legal Services
    Guide to Investment Chelyabinsk Region PwC Russia (www.pwc.ru) provides industry-focused assurance, advisory, tax and legal services. Over 2,500 professionals working in PwC offices in Moscow, St Petersburg, Ekaterinburg, Kazan, Novosibirsk, Krasnodar, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk and Vladikavkaz share their thinking, experience and solutions to develop fresh perspectives and practical advice for our clients. Global PwC network includes over 169,000 employees in 158 countries. PwC first appeared in Russia in 1913 and re-established its presence here in 1989. Since then, PwC has been a leader in providing professional services in Russia. According to the annual rating published in Expert magazine, PwC is the largest audit and consulting firm in Russia (see Expert, 2000-2011). This overview has been prepared in conjunction with and based on the materials provided by the Ministry of Economic Development of Chelyabinsk Region. This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, PwC network, its members, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information
    [Show full text]
  • Turkic Toponyms of Eurasia BUDAG BUDAGOV
    BUDAG BUDAGOV Turkic Toponyms of Eurasia BUDAG BUDAGOV Turkic Toponyms of Eurasia © “Elm” Publishing House, 1997 Sponsored by VELIYEV RUSTAM SALEH oglu T ranslated by ZAHID MAHAMMAD oglu AHMADOV Edited by FARHAD MAHAMMAD oglu MUSTAFAYEV Budagov B.A. Turkic Toponyms of Eurasia. - Baku “Elm”, 1997, -1 7 4 p. ISBN 5-8066-0757-7 The geographical toponyms preserved in the immense territories of Turkic nations are considered in this work. The author speaks about the parallels, twins of Azerbaijani toponyms distributed in Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Altay, the Ural, Western Si­ beria, Armenia, Iran, Turkey, the Crimea, Chinese Turkistan, etc. Be­ sides, the geographical names concerned to other Turkic language nations are elucidated in this book. 4602000000-533 В ------------------------- 655(07)-97 © “Elm” Publishing House, 1997 A NOTED SCIENTIST Budag Abdulali oglu Budagov was bom in 1928 at the village o f Chobankere, Zangibasar district (now Masis), Armenia. He graduated from the Yerevan Pedagogical School in 1947, the Azerbaijan State Pedagogical Institute (Baku) in 1951. In 1955 he was awarded his candidate and in 1967 doctor’s degree. In 1976 he was elected the corresponding-member and in 1989 full-member o f the Azerbaijan Academy o f Sciences. Budag Abdulali oglu is the author o f more than 500 scientific articles and 30 books. Researches on a number o f problems o f the geographical science such as geomorphology, toponymies, history o f geography, school geography, conservation o f nature, ecology have been carried out by academician B.A.Budagov. He makes a valuable contribution for popularization o f science.
    [Show full text]
  • BR IFIC N° 2611 Index/Indice
    BR IFIC N° 2611 Index/Indice International Frequency Information Circular (Terrestrial Services) ITU - Radiocommunication Bureau Circular Internacional de Información sobre Frecuencias (Servicios Terrenales) UIT - Oficina de Radiocomunicaciones Circulaire Internationale d'Information sur les Fréquences (Services de Terre) UIT - Bureau des Radiocommunications Part 1 / Partie 1 / Parte 1 Date/Fecha 22.01.2008 Description of Columns Description des colonnes Descripción de columnas No. Sequential number Numéro séquenciel Número sequencial BR Id. BR identification number Numéro d'identification du BR Número de identificación de la BR Adm Notifying Administration Administration notificatrice Administración notificante 1A [MHz] Assigned frequency [MHz] Fréquence assignée [MHz] Frecuencia asignada [MHz] Name of the location of Nom de l'emplacement de Nombre del emplazamiento de 4A/5A transmitting / receiving station la station d'émission / réception estación transmisora / receptora 4B/5B Geographical area Zone géographique Zona geográfica 4C/5C Geographical coordinates Coordonnées géographiques Coordenadas geográficas 6A Class of station Classe de station Clase de estación Purpose of the notification: Objet de la notification: Propósito de la notificación: Intent ADD-addition MOD-modify ADD-ajouter MOD-modifier ADD-añadir MOD-modificar SUP-suppress W/D-withdraw SUP-supprimer W/D-retirer SUP-suprimir W/D-retirar No. BR Id Adm 1A [MHz] 4A/5A 4B/5B 4C/5C 6A Part Intent 1 107125602 BLR 405.6125 BESHENKOVICHI BLR 29E28'13'' 55N02'57'' FB 1 ADD 2 107125603
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIAN DISTRICTS AWARD LIST" (Last Update 01.07.2012)
    "RUSSIAN DISTRICTS AWARD LIST" (Last update 01.07.2012) Republic of Adygeya (AD) UA6Y CITIES AD-01 MAIKOP AD-02 ADYGEJSK AREAS AD-03 GIAGINSKY AREA AD-04 KOSHEHABL'SKY AREA AD-05 KRASNOGVARDEJSKY AREA AD-06 MAJKOPSKY AREA AD-07 TAHTAMUKAJSKY AREA AD-08 TEUCHEZHSKY AREA AD-09 SHOVGENOVSKY AREA Altaysky Kraj (AL) UA9Y BARNAUL AREAS AL-01 ZHELEZNODOROZHNY AL-02 INDUSTRIALNY AL-03 LENINSKY AL-04 OKTJABR`SKY AL-05 CENTRALNY CITIES AL-06 deleted AL-07 deleted AL-08 RUBTSOVSK AL-09 SLAVGOROD AL-10 YAROVOE AREAS AL-11 ALEJSKY AREA AL-12 ALTAYSKY AREA AL-13 BAEVSKY AREA AL-14 BIJSKY AREA AL-15 BLAGOVESHCHENSKY AREA AL-16 BURLINSKY AREA AL-17 BYSTROISTOKSKY AREA AL-18 VOLCHIHINSKY AREA AL-19 EGOR'EVSKY AREA AL-20 EL'TSOVSKY AREA AL-21 ZAV'JALOVSKY AREA AL-22 ZALESOVSKY AREA AL-23 ZARINSKY AREA AL-24 ZMEINOGORSKY AREA AL-25 ZONALNY AREA AL-26 KALMANSKY AREA AL-27 KAMENSKY AREA AL-28 KLJUCHEVSKY AREA AL-29 KOSIHINSKY AREA AL-30 KRASNOGORSKY AREA AL-31 KRASNOSHCHEKOVSKY AREA AL-32 KRUTIHINSKY AREA AL-33 KULUNDINSKY AREA AL-34 KUR'INSKY AREA AL-35 KYTMANOVSKY AREA AL-36 LOKTEVSKY AREA AL-37 MAMONTOVSKY AREA AL-38 MIHAJLOVSKY AREA AL-39 NEMETSKY NATIONAL AREA AL-40 NOVICHIHINSKY AREA AL-41 PAVLOVSKY AREA AL-42 PANKRUSHIHINSKY AREA AL-43 PERVOMAJSKY AREA AL-44 PETROPAVLOVSKY AREA AL-45 POSPELIHINSKY AREA AL-46 REBRIHINSKY AREA AL-47 RODINSKY AREA AL-48 ROMANOVSKY AREA AL-49 RUBTSOVSKY AREA AL-50 SLAVGORODSKY AREA AL-51 SMOLENSKY AREA AL-52 SOVIETSKY AREA AL-53 SOLONESHENSKY AREA AL-54 SOLTONSKY AREA AL-55 SUETSKY AREA AL-56 TABUNSKY AREA AL-57 TAL'MENSKY
    [Show full text]
  • Monuments of the World Cultural Heritage in Russia - Challenges and Perspectives» and Annual Conference of the National Committee ICOMOS, Russia
    II International Scientific Symposium «Monuments of the World Cultural Heritage in Russia - challenges and perspectives» and Annual Conference of the National Committee ICOMOS, Russia ABSTRACTS 19-21 September 2018 Veliky Novgorod Putting a Stop to Losses, Managing the Present and the Future of the Cultural Heritage of Russia The bitter news of the fire that destroyed the wooden tent-roofed Church of the Assumption in Kondopoga, the Republic of Karelia has shocked all of us. It was a symbol of the spiritual and material power of the Russian people, a cultural monument of federal significance, an object of worship for thousands of people. Its beauty and sophistication, its unique image celebrated by poets and artists were fascinating. Numerous monographs both in Russia and abroad have been dedicated to it, for centuries it was passing down the generations the inimitable charm of the Russian North. This loss is irreversible, architectural monuments may not be cloned. It is imperative to put a stop to losing the masterpieces of the wooden architecture in which Russia used to be so rich. The VII Parliamentary Forum in June 2018 in Suzdal dedicated to this most fragile part of our cultural heritage has raised the issue of the necessity to ensure the safety of the cultural heritage object's that are located far from populated places, in the hard to access areas which was historically predetermined. Russia possesses a unique experience in protecting the objects of the national significance. Vandalizing priceless cultural masterpieces is a kind of terrorism which our country prevails. In our opinion, the state should adopt a comprehensive inter-agency program for protection of the cultural heritage of the Russian North, Siberia and Far East.
    [Show full text]