36332 Federal Register / Vol. 45, No. 105 / Thursday, May 29,1980 / Proposed Rules

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

36332 Federal Register / Vol. 45, No. 105 / Thursday, May 29,1980 / Proposed Rules 36332 Federal Register / Vol. 45, No. 105 / Thursday, May 29,1980 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTEfllOR two centimeters across. The plants four other proposals which had expired. occur on open wind-swept rock ledges. At this time the Service has sufficient Fish and Wildlife Service The continued existence of this plant new information to warrant reproposing and the fragile plant communities in Hudsonia montana. Critical Habitat is 50 CFR Part 17 which it occurs are being threatened by being proposed for Hudsonia montana . Endangered and Threatened Wildlife trampling. This rule proposes to for the first time. and Plants; Proposal To Determine determine Hudsonia montana to be a The Department has determined that threatened species and would this is not a significant rule and does not “Hudsonia montana” (mountain implement the protection provided by golden-heather) To Be a Threatened require the preparation of a regulatory Species and To Determine Its Critical the Endangered Species Act. The analysis under Executive Order 12044 following paragraphs further discuss the and 43 CFR Part 14. Habitat actions to date involving this plant, the Summary of Factors Affecting the AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, threats to the plant, and effects of the Interior. proposed action. Species ACTION: ProDosed rule. Background Section 4[a) of the Endangered Species Act (16 USC. 1531 et seq.) SUMMARY: The Service proposes to Section 12 of the Endangered Species states that the Secretary of the Interior determine a plant, Hudsonia montana Act of 1973 directed the Secretary of the shall determine whether any species is (mountain golden-heather), to be a Smithsonian Institution to prepare a an Endangered species or a Threatened Threatened species and to determine its report on those plants considered to be species due to one or more of the five Critical Habitat under the authority endangered, threatened, or extinct. This factors described in Section 4(a) of the contained in the Endangered Species report, designated as House Document Act. These factors and their application Act. This olant occurs in North Carolina. No. 94-51, was presented to Congress on to Hudsonia montanb Nuttall (mountain on land owned by the U.S. Forest January 9,1975. On July 1,1975. the golden-heather) are as follows: Service and is threatened by trampling Director published a notice in the (I) Present or threatened destruction, and other factors. This proposal, if Federal Register (40 FR 2782347924) of ’ modification or curtailment of its finalized, would implement Federal his acceptance of the report of the Smithsonian Institution as a petition habitat or range. Hudsonia montana protection provided by the Endangered was originally collected by Thomas Species Act of 1973. as amended. within the context of Section 4(c)(2) of the Act, and of his intention thereby to Nuttall in 1816, from the summit of Table DATES: Comments from the public must Rock Mountain in Burke County, North be received by July 28.1980. Comments review the status of the plant taxa named within. On June 16,1976, the Carolina. Since its discovery, it has been from the Governor of North Carolina collected at infrequent intervals from must be received by August 27,198O. A Service published a proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register (41 _ this and several other locations all public meeting on this proposal will be within an eight kilometer radius of held on Tuesday, July 1 at 7:oOp.m. FR 24523-23472) to determine approximately 1,700 vascular plant Table Rock Mountain, all within Burke ADDRESS: Public meeting location: species to be Endangered species County, North Carolina. The species Western Piedmont Community College pursuant to Section 4 of the Act. This list was assumed extinct by various recent auditorium, Morganton, North Carolina. of 1,700 plant taxa was assembled on treatments due to the failure of botanists Comments and materials concerning the basis of comments and data to relocate the populations. However, all this proposal, preferably in triplicate, received by the Smithsonian Institution populations were still extant in 1978 should be sent to the Director (FWS/ and the Service in response to House (Morse 1980). OES), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Document No. 94-51 and the July 1,1975 Although all populations are still Department of the Interior, Washington, Federal Register publication. Hudsonia extant, two populations have shown D.C. 20240. montana was included in the July 1, declines in the number of individuals Comments and materials received will 1975, notice of review and the June 16, present [Morse 1980). Nuttall, in 1816, be available for public inspection during 1976, proposal. The notice of review and described Hudsonia montano as normal business hours, by appointment, the proposal included Hudsonia abundant and forming extensive at the Service’s Office of Endangered ericoides ssp. montana rather than caespitose patches on Table Rock Species, 1000 N. Glebe Road, Fifth Floor, Hudsonia montana. Treatm.ent of this (Pennell 1936). In 1978, approximately 21 Arlington, Virginia 22201. taxon as a subspecies. by Skog and plants [including juveniles and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nickerson (1972) was followed by the seedlings) were observed to be present Mr. John L. Spinks, Chief, Office of Smithsonian Institution and thus the on Table Rock (Morse. 19801. Endangered Species, Fish and Wildlife derived Federal Register publications. This reductidn is, in’part, hue to Service, US. Department of the Interior, Since 1972. however, this taxon has trampling and soil compaction by Washingt0n.D.C. 20240,703/235-2771. been treated as a species by various human visitors. One location receives SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: authors. Recent morphological, heavy use by hikers and campers and Hudsonia montana [mountain golden- cytological, and population studies by one camp fire circle resulted in the heather) was.first discovered on the Morse (1979) have confirmed the partial charring of one large clump of summit of Table Rock, North Carolina in distinctness of Hudsonia montana from Hudsonia montana. The other 1816, by Thomas Nuttall. Today all Hudsonia ericoides. populations have not been monitored, so known populations of the species occur The Endangered Species Act changes in the populations cannot be within an eight kilometer radius of Amendments of 1978 required that all readily determined. All populations are Table Rock, and all are on U.S. Forest proposals over two years old be threatened by the heavy use the area Service land. The plant is a low withdrawn. A one year grace period was receives from hikers and rock climbers perennial shrub with needle-leaves and given to proposals already over two and all populations show impact from yellow flowers which measure about years old. On December 10,1979. the trampling. Misplaced trails or Service published a notice withdrawing inadequately regulated hiking and the June 16,1976, proposal along with climbing could destroy entire Federal Register / Vol. 45, No. 105 / Thursday, May 29, 1980 / FVoposed Rules 36333 populations or population segments in a The small size and number of tbe stated above, designation would impact short period. populations cause this species to be in only Forest Service practices relating to Hudsonia montana grows on exposed greater danger of extinction due to controlling recreational land usage. The .1 quartzite ledges in an ecotone between natural fluctuations of populations, Service has been in contact with the bare rock and Leiophyfium-dominated especially in the case of the three Forest Service and others who had input ” heath balds which merge into pine-oak smaller populations. into the economid analysis of this proposed Critical Habitat. This forest. All populations &cur on land Critical Habitat owned by the U.S. Forest Service in the economic analysis served as part of the North Fork Catawba River Planninn The Act defines “Critical Habitat” as basis for the Service’s decisions as to Unit, Pisgah National Forest, North” (i) the specific areas within the whether or not to exclude any area from Carolina. geographical area occupied by the the Critical Habitat for Hudsonia Efforts to develop a habitat species, at the time it is listed, in montana. Tbe Service will prepare a management and monitoring plan are accordance with the provisions of final impact analysis prior to the time of being initiated for the Hudsonia Section 4 of the Act, on which are found final rulemaking. montana populations by the U.S. Forest those physical or biological features (I] Service personnel. Possible measures essential to the conservation of the Effects of This Proposal if Published as a which this plan could incorporate species and (II) which may require Final Rule include: special management considerations or In addition to the effects discussed (a) Regulations restricting climbing, protection: and (ii) specific areas outside above, the effects of-this proposal if campfires, and off-trail hiking on the geographic area occupied by the published as a final rule would include, designated ledges; species at the time it is listed, in but would not necessarily be limited to, (b) Consideration of Hudsonia accordance with the provisions of those mentioned below. requirements in trail maintenance Section 4 of this Act, upon a The Act and implementing regulations operations: determination by the Secretary that such found at 50 CFR 17.61 set forth a series (c) Realignment of trails at locations areas are essential for the conservation of general prohibitions and exceptions where these pose a threat to the plant of the species. which apply to all Endangered plant and implementation of erosion control Section 4(f)(4) of the Act requires, to species. All of those prohibitions and measures at these locations: and the maximum extent practicable that exceptions also apply to any Threatened (d) Monitoring studies to evaluate the any proposal to determine Critical species, excluding seeds of cultivated maintenance and reproduction of Habitat be accompanied by a brief plants treated as Threatened, unless a Hudsonia montana.
Recommended publications
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Landscapes of Maine a Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems
    Natural Landscapes of Maine A Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems by Susan Gawler and Andrew Cutko Natural Landscapes of Maine A Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems by Susan Gawler and Andrew Cutko Copyright © 2010 by the Maine Natural Areas Program, Maine Department of Conservation 93 State House Station, Augusta, Maine 04333-0093 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without written permission from the authors or the Maine Natural Areas Program, except for inclusion of brief quotations in a review. Illustrations and photographs are used with permission and are copyright by the contributors. Images cannot be reproduced without expressed written consent of the contributor. ISBN 0-615-34739-4 To cite this document: Gawler, S. and A. Cutko. 2010. Natural Landscapes of Maine: A Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Maine Department of Conservation, Augusta, Maine. Cover photo: Circumneutral Riverside Seep on the St. John River, Maine Printed and bound in Maine using recycled, chlorine-free paper Contents Page Acknowledgements ..................................................................................... 3 Foreword ..................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM LIST OF THE RARE PLANTS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2012 Edition Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist and John Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org Table of Contents LIST FORMAT ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 NORTH CAROLINA RARE PLANT LIST ......................................................................................................................... 10 NORTH CAROLINA PLANT WATCH LIST ..................................................................................................................... 71 Watch Category
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY
    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Ackerfield, J., and J. Wen. 2002. A morphometric analysis of Hedera L. (the ivy genus, Araliaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Adansonia 24: 197-212. Adams, P. 1961. Observations on the Sagittaria subulata complex. Rhodora 63: 247-265. Adams, R.M. II, and W.J. Dress. 1982. Nodding Lilium species of eastern North America (Liliaceae). Baileya 21: 165-188. Adams, R.P. 1986. Geographic variation in Juniperus silicicola and J. virginiana of the Southeastern United States: multivariant analyses of morphology and terpenoids. Taxon 35: 31-75. ------. 1995. Revisionary study of Caribbean species of Juniperus (Cupressaceae). Phytologia 78: 134-150. ------, and T. Demeke. 1993. Systematic relationships in Juniperus based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). Taxon 42: 553-571. Adams, W.P. 1957. A revision of the genus Ascyrum (Hypericaceae). Rhodora 59: 73-95. ------. 1962. Studies in the Guttiferae. I. A synopsis of Hypericum section Myriandra. Contr. Gray Herbarium Harv. 182: 1-51. ------, and N.K.B. Robson. 1961. A re-evaluation of the generic status of Ascyrum and Crookea (Guttiferae). Rhodora 63: 10-16. Adams, W.P. 1973. Clusiaceae of the southeastern United States. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 89: 62-71. Adler, L. 1999. Polygonum perfoliatum (mile-a-minute weed). Chinquapin 7: 4. Aedo, C., J.J. Aldasoro, and C. Navarro. 1998. Taxonomic revision of Geranium sections Batrachioidea and Divaricata (Geraniaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 594-630. Affolter, J.M. 1985. A monograph of the genus Lilaeopsis (Umbelliferae). Systematic Bot. Monographs 6. Ahles, H.E., and A.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Variation in the Genus Hudsonia Marion T. Hall, Butler University Hudsonia, in the small family Cistaceae, contains three species all restricted to North America where they grow in sandy areas. These plants are small xerophytic shrubs, rather bushy with fine heath-like foliage, bearing leaves which are downy, small, sessile, appressed, per- sistent and alternate on the stems and bearing many bright-yellow flowers, borne singly at the ends of short branches. The most widely distributed species, Hudsonia tomentosa (commonly called Beach-heath), occurs from Nova Scotia south along the Atlantic coast to Virginia and west along lake-shores, river-banks, and sand-hills to northern Alberta and south to the southern shores of Lake Michigan and Lake Erie. Hudsonia ericoides (known as Golden-heather) is the type species and occurs in Newfoundland, Prince Edward Island, and along the Atlantic to Virginia. The most restricted species, Hudsonia montana apparently occurs only on Table Mountain in North Carolina. On the sandy shores of Lake Pleasant, Hamilton Co., New York, Charles H. Peck, State Botanist of New York, in 1891 found a plant closely resembling H. tomentosa. He wrote in the New York State Museum Report, "The plants in their remarkably inland station differ so much from the typical form of the species that I am disposed to consider them a good variety. They are intermediate between H. tomen- tosa and H. ericoides and may therefore bear the name var. intermedia. Stems and branches more slender and longer; leaves narrow, less im- bricating and less tomentose; flowers or pedicels mostly a little longer than the leaves." Since Peck's description the var.
    [Show full text]
  • Federally-Listed Wildlife Species
    Assessment for the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs March 2014 Federally-Listed Wildlife Species Ten federally-endangered (E) or threatened (T) wildlife species are known to occur on or immediately adjacent to the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests (hereafter, the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs). These include four small mammals, two terrestrial invertebrates, three freshwater mussels, and one fish (Table 1). Additionally, two endangered species historically occurred on or adjacent to the Forest, but are considered extirpated, or absent, from North Carolina and are no longer tracked by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (Table 1). Table 1. Federally-listed wildlife species known to occur or historically occurring on or immediately adjacent to the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests. Common Name Scientific Name Federal Status Small Mammals Carolina northern flying Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus Endangered squirrel Gray myotis Myotis grisescens Endangered Virginia big-eared bat Corynorhinus townsendii Endangered virginianus Northern long-eared bat Myotis septentrionalis Endangered* Indiana bat Myotis sodalis Endangered Terrestrial Invertebrates Spruce-fir moss spider Microhexura montivaga Endangered noonday globe Patera clarki Nantahala Threatened Freshwater Mussels Appalachian elktoe Alasmidonta raveneliana Endangered Little-wing pearlymussel Pegius fabula Endangered Cumberland bean Villosa trabilis Endangered Spotfin chub Erimonax monachus Threatened Species Considered Extirpated From North Carolina American burying beetle Nicrophorous americanus Endangered Eastern cougar Puma concolor cougar Endangered *Pending final listing following the 12-month finding published in the Federal Register, October 2, 2013. Additionally, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is addressing petitions to federally list two aquatic species known to occur on or immediately adjacent to Nantahala and Pisgah NFs: eastern hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis), a large aquatic salamander, and sicklefin redhorse (Moxostoma species 2), a fish.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Vascular Flora of Annapolis Heathlands, Nova Scotia
    12_05055_flora.qxd 11/1/07 11:11 AM Page 351 An Analysis of the Vascular Flora of Annapolis Heathlands, Nova Scotia S. CARBYN1, P. M. CATLING2, S. P. VANDER KLOET3, and S. BASQUILL4 1Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Environmental Health, Biodiversity, 32 Main Street, Kentville, Nova Scotia B4N 1J5 2 Agriculture and AgriFood Canada, Environmental Health, Biodiversity, Saunders Bldg., Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 Canada; e-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Biology, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia B4P 2R6 Canada 4Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre, PO Box 6416, Sackville, New Brunswick E4L 1G6 Canada; e-mail: sbasquill@ mta.ca Carbyn, S., P. M. Catling, S. P. Vander Kloet, and S. Basquill. 2006. An analysis of the vascular flora of Annapolis Heath- lands, Nova Scotia. Canadian Field-Naturalist 120(3): 351–362. A description and analysis of the vascular plant composition of heathlands in the Annapolis valley were undertaken to pro- vide a basis for biodiversity preservation within a system of protected sites. Species presence and abundance were recorded at 23 remnant sites identified using topographic maps, air photos, and Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources records. A total of 126 species was recorded, of which 94 were native and 31 introduced. The Annapolis heathland remnants are strongly dominated by Corema conradii with Comptonia peregrina, Vaccinium angustifolium and Pteridium aquilinum var. latiusculum. A number of species, including Solidago bicolor, Carex tonsa var. rugosperma, Dichanthelium depauperatum, Lechea intermedia, Melampyrum lineare, and Rubus hispidus, were characteristic of heathland remnants, although they usu- ally contributed little to the total cover.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Years of Change in the Flora of the Carolinas
    ASTERACEAE 224 Zinnia Linnaeus 1759 (Zinnia) A genus of about 17 species, herbs, of sw. North America south to South America. References: Smith in FNA (2006c); Cronquist (1980)=SE. 1 Achenes wingless; receptacular bracts (chaff) toothed or erose on the lip..............................................................Z. peruviana 1 Achenes winged; receptacular bracts (chaff) with a differentiated fimbriate lip........................................................Z. violacea * Zinnia peruviana (Linnaeus) Linnaeus, Zinnia. Cp (GA, NC, SC): disturbed areas; rare (commonly cultivated), introduced from the New World tropics. May-November. [= FNA, K, SE; ? Z. pauciflora Linnaeus – S] * Zinnia violacea Cavanilles, Garden Zinnia. Cp (GA, NC, SC): disturbed areas; rare (commonly cultivated), introduced from the New World tropics. May-November. [= FNA, K; ? Z. elegans Jacquin – S, SE] BALSAMINACEAE A. Richard 1822 (Touch-me-not Family) A family of 2 genera and 850-1000 species, primarily of the Old World tropics. References: Fischer in Kubitzki (2004). Impatiens Linnaeus (Jewelweed, Touch-me-not, Snapweed, Balsam) A genus of 850-1000 species, herbs and subshrubs, primarily tropical and north temperate Old World. References: Fischer in Kubitzki (2004). 1 Corolla purple, pink, or white; plants 3-6 (-8) dm tall; stems puberulent or glabrous; [cultivated alien, rarely escaped]. 2 Sepal spur strongly recurved; stems puberulent..............................................................................................I. balsamina 2 Sepal spur slightly
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright Statement
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk 04 University of Plymouth Research Theses 01 Research Theses Main Collection 2014 Comparative Demography and Life history Evolution of Plants Mbeau ache, Cyril http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/3201 Plymouth University All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. Copyright Statement This copy of the thesis has been supplied on the condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the author’s prior consent. Title page Comparative Demography and Life history Evolution of Plants By Cyril Mbeau ache (10030310) A thesis submitted to Plymouth University in partial fulfillment for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Biological Sciences Plymouth University, UK August 2014 ii Comparative demography and life history evolution of plants Cyril Mbeau ache Abstract Explaining the origin and maintenance of biodiversity is a central goal in ecology and evolutionary biology. Some of the most important, theoretical explanations for this diversity centre on the evolution of life histories. Comparative studies on life history evolution, have received significant attention in the zoological literature, but have lagged in plants. Recent developments, however, have emphasised the value of comparative analysis of data for many species to test existing theories of life history evolution, as well as to provide the basis for developing additional or alternative theories.
    [Show full text]
  • Broom Crowberry Corema Conradii
    Natural Heritage Broom Crowberry & Endangered Species Corema conradii (Torr.) Torr. ex Loudon Program www.mass.gov/nhesp State Status: None Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife Federal Status: None DESCRIPTION: Broom Crowberry (Corema conradii), a member of the heath family (Ericaceae), is a low-growing evergreen shrub of barrens, heathlands, and dunes. It has short, needle-like leaves and small, purplish flowers that bloom very early in spring. AIDS TO IDENTIFICATION: Broom Crowberry is a densely branched evergreen shrub, up to 20 inches (50 cm) in height and 6.5 feet (2 m) wide. It has linear, alternate leaves up to 0.2 inches (6 mm) long. The flowers are reddish or purplish, and lack petals. They are borne in small, sessile, terminal heads and are subtended by sepal-like bracts. The fruit is a very small drupe (<0.1 inch; 1.5 mm) with three seeds. SIMILAR SPECIES: Broom Crowberry is similar in Photo by Mary Beth Hanley appearance to a common habitat associate, Golden Heather (Hudsonia ericoides). Golden Heather is also a Erica spp.) are superficially similar to Broom low-growing, spreading, evergreen shrub of barrens, Crowberry, but have opposite or whorled leaves, and dunes, and heathlands, with linear, alternate leaves. whitish or pinkish flowers that bloom in mid to late However, unlike Broom Crowberry, Golden Heather has summer. axillary, solitary flowers, with definite pedicels, and five yellow petals. Introduced heathers (Calluna vulgaris; RANGE: Broom Crowberry is endemic to northeastern North America, and occurs in Nova Scotia, Quebec, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick, Maine, Massachusetts, New York, and New Jersey.
    [Show full text]
  • References and Suggested Reading
    References and Suggested Reading • BEANS, B. & NILES, L. (eds.), 2003. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife of New Jersey. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. • BOYD, H., 1991. A Field Guide to the Pine Barrens of New Jersey. Medford, NJ: Plexus Publishing, Inc. • BOYD, H.P., 1997. A Pine Barrens Odyssey. Medford, NJ: Plexus Publishing, Inc. • BOYD, H.P., 2001. Wildflowers of the Pine Barrens of New Jersey. Medford, NJ: Plexus Publishing, Inc. • COLLINS, B.R. & ANDERSON, K.H., 1994. Plant Communities of New Jersey: A Study in Landscape Diversity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. • COLLINS, B.R. & RUSSELL, E.W.B., (eds.), 1988. Protecting the New Jersey Pinelands: A New Direction in Land-Use Management. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. • FORMAN, R.T.T. (ed.), 1979. Pine Barrens: Ecosystem and Landscape. New York: Academic Press, Inc. • GELLER, M., 2002. A Key to the Woody Plants of the New Jersey Pine Barrens. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. • KENNISH, M. (ed.), Journal of Coastal Research, Fall 2001, Special Issue 32, p. 82. • KENNISH, M., 2001. The Scientific Characterization Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary and Watershed. Barnegat Bay Estuary Program. • McPHEE, J., 1967. The Pine Barrens. New York, NY: Noonday. • PIERCE, A.D., 1957. Iron in the Pines. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. • PINELANDS COMMISSION, 1980. The Pinelands Comprehensive Management Plan. New Lisbon, NJ: Pinelands Commission. • SOLEM-STULL, BARBARA, 2005. Ghost Towns and Other Quirky Places in the New Jersey Pine Barrens. Medford, NJ: Plexus Publishing, Inc. • WACKER, P.O., 1975. Land & People: A Cultural Geography of Preindustrial New Jersey: Origins and Settlement Patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Vegetation Change by Using Remote Sensing: an Examination of Visitor-Induced Impact at Cadillac Mountain, Acadia National Park Min Kook Kim
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library 5-2010 Monitoring Vegetation Change by Using Remote Sensing: An Examination of Visitor-Induced Impact at Cadillac Mountain, Acadia National Park Min Kook Kim Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Forest Biology Commons Recommended Citation Kim, Min Kook, "Monitoring Vegetation Change by Using Remote Sensing: An Examination of Visitor-Induced Impact at Cadillac Mountain, Acadia National Park" (2010). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 417. http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/417 This Open-Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. MONITORING VEGETATION CHANGE BY USING REMOTE SENSING: AN EXAMINATION OF VISITOR-INDUCED IMPACT AT CADILLAC MOUNTAIN, ACADIA NATIONAL PARK By Min Kook Kim B.A. Chung-Ang University, 2000 M.A. Seoul National University, 2002 M.U.P. State University of New York at Buffalo, 2005 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in Forest Resources) The Graduate School The University of Maine May, 2010 Advisory Committee: John Daigle, Associate Professor of Forest Resources, Program Leader, Parks, Recreation, and Tourism, Advisor Jessica Leahy, Assistant Professor of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources Robert Lilieholm, E.L. Giddings Associate Professor of Forest Policy Steven Sader, Professor of Forest Resources and Cooperating Professor of Wildlife Ecology, Director of Maine Image Analysis Laboratory (MIAL) Christa Schwintzer, Professor of Biology, Assistant Director for Undergraduate Programs DISSERTATION ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT On behalf of the Graduate Committee for Min Kook Kim, I affirm that this manuscript is the final and accepted thesis.
    [Show full text]