Habitat Surveys for the Threatened Swamp Pink (Helonias Bullata)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Habitat Surveys for the Threatened Swamp Pink (Helonias Bullata) UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OCTOBER 1992 EPA HABITAT SURVEYS FOR THE THREATENED SWAMP PINK (HELONIAS BULLATA) AND THE THREATENED KNIESKERN'S BEAKED-RUSH (RHYNCHQSPQRA KNIESKERNIH AT VARIOUS NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST SITES IN NEW JERSEY CBA 008 01089 HABITAT SURVEYS FOR THE THREATENED SWAMP PINK (HELONIAS BULLATA) AND THE THREATENED KNIESKERN'S BEAKED-RUSH (RHYNCHOSPORA KNIESKERNII) AT VARIOUS NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST SITES IN NEW JERSEY Prepared by: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region II New York, New York With Assistance from: Gannett Fleming, Inc. Harrisburg, Pennsylvania In Association with: EcolSciences, Inc. Rockaway, New Jersey October 30, 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES iii LIST OF TABLES iv I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. NATURAL HISTORY 4 A. Swamp Pink 4 1. Background 4 2. Description " 5 3. Habitat Requirements 7 B. Knieskern's Beaked-Rush 11 1. Background 11 2. Description 11 3. Habitat Requirements 12 III. SITE DESCRIPTIONS 16 A. Wi 1 son Farm 17 1. Site Description and History 17 2. Proposed Remedial Action . 19 3. Existing Mapping of Environmental Conditions 19 4. Previous On-site Habitat Studies 22 B. Woodland Township/Route 532 22 1. Site Description and History 22 2. Proposed Remedial Action .... 25 3. Existing Mapping of Environmental Conditions 26 4. Previous On-site Habitat Studies 29 C. Woodland Township/Route 72 29 1. Site Description and History . 29 2. Proposed Remedial Action 32 3. Existing Mapping of Environmental Conditions 33 4. Previous On-site Habitat Studies 35 D. Chemsol, Inc 35 1. Site Description and History 35 2. Proposed Remedial Action 38 3. Existing Mapping of Environmental Conditions 40 4. Previous On-site Habitat Studies ... 43 E. Evor Phillips Leasing 43 1. Site Description and History 43 2. Proposed Remedial Action ..... 43 3. Existing Mapping of Environmental Conditions 45 4. Previous On-site Habitat Studies 49 F. Ewan Property 49 1. Site Description and History 49 2. Proposed Remedial Action 49 3. Existing Mapping of Environmental Conditions 52 4. - Previous On-site Habitat Studies 54 G. Ciba-Geigy 54 1. Site Description and History 54 2. Proposed Remedial Action 57 3. Existing Mapping of Environmental Conditions 58 4. Previous On-site Habitat Studies 61 CBA 008 01091 Table of Contents (continued) Page H. Lang Property . ; 63 1. Site Description and History 63 2. Proposed Remedial Action 65 3. Existing Mapping of Environmental Conditions 65 4. Previous On-site Habitat Studies 67 IV. FIELD SURVEY RATIONALE 70 A. Wilson Farm 70 1. Swamp Pink 70 a. Habitat Comparison 70 b. Existing Records 70 c. Recommendation 70 B. Woodland Township/Route 532 70 1. Swamp Pink 70 a. Habitat Comparison 70 b. Existing Records 73 c. Recommendation 73 2. Knieskern's Beaked-rush ..... 73 a. Habitat Comparison 73 b. Existing Records 73 c. Recommendation 74 C. Woodland Township/Route 72 74 1. Swamp Pi nk 74 a. Habitat Comparison 74 b. Existing Records 74 c. Recommendation 74 2. Knieskern's Beaked-rush 74 a. Habitat Comparison 74 b. Existing Records 75 c. Recommendation 75 D. Evor Phillips Leasing 75 1. Swamp Pink 75 a. Habitat Comparison 75 b. Existing Records 75 c. Recommendation 76 E. Chemsol Inc 76 1. Swamp Pink 76 a. Habitat Comparison 76 b. Existing Records 76 c. Recommendation 76 F. Ewan Property 77 1. Swamp Pink 77 a. Habitat Comparison 77 b. Existing Records 77 c. Recommendation 77 G. Ciba Geigy 77 1. - Swamp Pi nk 77 a. Habitat Comparison 77 b. Existing Records 77 c. Recommendation 78 -i i- < ;CBA 008 01092 Table of Contents (continued) Page 2. Knieskern*s Beaked-rush 78 a. Habitat Comparison 78 b. Existing Records 78 c. Recommendation 78 H. Lang Property 79 1. Swamp Pink 79 a. Habitat Comparison 79 b. Existing Records 79 c. Recommendation 79 2. Knieskern's Beaked-rush 79 a. Habitat Comparison 79 b. Existing Records 79 c. Recommendation 80 V. HABITAT SURVEY WORK PLAN 81 A. Introduction 81 B. Study Seasonality 81 C. Plant Identification 82 D. Field Survey 82 1. Phase I - Site Reconnaissance with RPM 83 2. Phase II - Habitat Mapping 83 3. Phase III - Field Survey Method 83 VI. RESULTS OF THE HABITAT SURVEY 85 A. Wilson Farm 85 B. Woodland Township/Route 532 8'6 C. Woodland Township/Route 72 86 D. Ewan Property 87 E. Ciba-Geigy . 87 F. Lang Property 88 VII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 89 REFERENCES 90 APPENDIX A - USFWS Consultation Letters APPENDIX B - Habitat Mapping APPENDIX C - Results of Timed Meander Search APPENDIX D - Species Effort Curves LIST OF FIGURES Figure - Description Page 1 Distribution Map for Swamp Pink and Knieskern's Beaked-rush in New Jersey 6 -iii- . ( i i i CBA 008 01093 Table of Contents List of Figures (continued) Figure Description Page 2 Line Drawing of Swamp Pink 8 3 Line Drawing of Knieskern's Beaked-rush 13 4A Site Location: Wilson Farm 18 4B USFWS NWI Mapping: Wilson Farm 20 4C SCS Soils Mapping: Wilson Farm 21 4D Pine Barrens Mapping: Wilson Farm 23 5A Site Location: Woodland/Route 532 24 5B USFWS NWI Mapping: Woodland/Route 532 27 5C SCS Soils Mapping: Woodland/Route 532 28 5D Pine Barrens Mapping: Woodland/Route 532 30 6A Site Location: Woodland/Route 72 31 6B USFWS NWI Mapping: Woodland/Route 72 .34 6C SCS Soils Mapping: Woodland/Route 72 36 6D Pine Barrens Mapping: Woodland/Route 72 37 7A Site Location: Chemsol Inc 39 7B USFWS NWI Mapping: Chemsol Inc 41 7C SCS Soils Mapping: Chemsol Inc ' 42 8A Site Location: Evor Phillips Leasing 44 8B USFWS NWI Mapping: Evor Phillips Leasing 46 8C SCS Soils Mapping: Evor Phillips Leasing 47 8D Pine Barrens Mapping: Evor Phillips Leasing 48 9A Site Location: Ewan Property 50 9B USFWS NWI Mapping: Ewan Property 51 9C SCS Soils Mapping: Ewan Property 53 9D Pine Barrens Mapping: Ewan Property 55 10A Site Location: Ciba-Geigy . 56 10B USFWS NWI Mapping: Ciba-Geigy 59 IOC SCS Soils Mapping: Ciba-Geigy 60 10D Pine Barrens Mapping: Ciba-Geigy 62 11A Site Location: Lang Property 64 11B USFWS NWI Mapping: Lang Property 66 11C SCS Soils Mapping: Lang Property 68 11D Pine Barrens Mapping: Lang Property 69 LIST OF TABLES Table Description Page 1 Vegetation Associates of Helonias bullata 9 2 Vegetation Associates of Rhynchospora knieskernii . 14 3 Summary of Findings 71 [ CBA 008 01094 I. INTRODUCTION The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, (CERCLA), commonly referred to as "Superfund", was enacted in December 1980. Under CERCLA, the federal government is authorized to compel responsible parties to conduct cleanup of hazardous waste sites or initiate cleanup actions and then determine who is liable for the cost of clean-up. The Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) provided additional funds for Superfund cleanups but did not significantly change the basic principles of Superfund. Section 121 of CERCLA establishes general rules for selecting and implementing remedial actions at Superfund sites. This section specifies that remedial actions must comply with all applicable, relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs). Standards, requirements, criteria or limitations under any federal environmental law are to be met if legally applicable or relevant and appropriate. Section 7(a) of the Endangered Species Act (1973) requires federal agencies to ensure that actions they authorize, fund, or carry out are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of federally endangered and/or threatened species, or adversely modify or destroy the critical habitats of such species. In compliance with this Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducts informal consultations with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to determine whether there are any federally endangered and/or threatened species or critical habitats present on or in the vicinity of CERCLA National Priorities List (NPL) sites. As a result of several recent informal consultations (Appendix A), the potential for the presence of the threatened plant species, swamp pink (Helonias bullata). has been identified within the vicinity of various NPL sites in New Jersey, including: 1. WiJson Farm, Ocean County . ; 2. Woodland Township/Route 532, Burlington County 3. Woodland Township/Route 72.,. Burlington County I CBA 008 01095 4. Chemsol Inc., Middlesex County 5. Evor Phillips Leasing, Middlesex County 6. Ewan Property, Burlington County 7. Ciba-Geigy, Ocean County 8. Lang Property, Burlington County Additionally, the potential for the occurrence of the habitat of another threatened plant, Knieskern's beaked-rush (Rhvnchospora knieskernii). has also been identified near several sites, including: 1. Ciba-Geigy, Ocean County 2. Lang Property, Burlington County 3. Woodland Township/Route 532, Burlington County 4. Woodland Township/Route 72, Burlington County The objective of this special study is to determine through a literature search and possible field survey, whether the federally threatened plant species swamp pink and Knieskern's beaked-rush or their habitats are present on the above-listed NPL sites. Furthermore, because the impact of remedial activities on the above-listed NPL sites may extend beyond the boundaries of the sites, study areas were defined based upon the location of potential habitat for the threatened plant species that may be affected by site remediation. The Scope of Work for this special study is comprised of task series covering the following items: 1. A review of existing information concerning the habitat requirements of the species; 2. A review of known sightings or locations of suitable species habitat in the vicinity of each of the NPL sites; 3. Development of a habitat survey work plan; 4. Implementation of the habitat survey work plan; and 5. Documentation of the presence or absence of the species in a technicaT report. -2- CBA 008 01096 j This Habitat Survey presents the findings of the literature review phase and field survey phase of the study.
Recommended publications
  • Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE
    Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Landscapes of Maine a Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems
    Natural Landscapes of Maine A Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems by Susan Gawler and Andrew Cutko Natural Landscapes of Maine A Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems by Susan Gawler and Andrew Cutko Copyright © 2010 by the Maine Natural Areas Program, Maine Department of Conservation 93 State House Station, Augusta, Maine 04333-0093 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without written permission from the authors or the Maine Natural Areas Program, except for inclusion of brief quotations in a review. Illustrations and photographs are used with permission and are copyright by the contributors. Images cannot be reproduced without expressed written consent of the contributor. ISBN 0-615-34739-4 To cite this document: Gawler, S. and A. Cutko. 2010. Natural Landscapes of Maine: A Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Maine Department of Conservation, Augusta, Maine. Cover photo: Circumneutral Riverside Seep on the St. John River, Maine Printed and bound in Maine using recycled, chlorine-free paper Contents Page Acknowledgements ..................................................................................... 3 Foreword ..................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands 1996
    National List of Vascular Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary Indicator by Region and Subregion Scientific Name/ North North Central South Inter- National Subregion Northeast Southeast Central Plains Plains Plains Southwest mountain Northwest California Alaska Caribbean Hawaii Indicator Range Abies amabilis (Dougl. ex Loud.) Dougl. ex Forbes FACU FACU UPL UPL,FACU Abies balsamea (L.) P. Mill. FAC FACW FAC,FACW Abies concolor (Gord. & Glend.) Lindl. ex Hildebr. NI NI NI NI NI UPL UPL Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir. FACU FACU FACU Abies grandis (Dougl. ex D. Don) Lindl. FACU-* NI FACU-* Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt. NI NI FACU+ FACU- FACU FAC UPL UPL,FAC Abies magnifica A. Murr. NI UPL NI FACU UPL,FACU Abildgaardia ovata (Burm. f.) Kral FACW+ FAC+ FAC+,FACW+ Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL FACU- FACU- UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL NI NI UPL,FACU- Acacia choriophylla Benth. FAC* FAC* Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. FACU NI NI* NI NI FACU Acacia greggii Gray UPL UPL FACU FACU UPL,FACU Acacia macracantha Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd. NI FAC FAC Acacia minuta ssp. minuta (M.E. Jones) Beauchamp FACU FACU Acaena exigua Gray OBL OBL Acalypha bisetosa Bertol. ex Spreng. FACW FACW Acalypha virginica L. FACU- FACU- FAC- FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acalypha virginica var. rhomboidea (Raf.) Cooperrider FACU- FAC- FACU FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Humm. FAC* NI NI FAC* Acanthomintha ilicifolia (Gray) Gray FAC* FAC* Acanthus ebracteatus Vahl OBL OBL Acer circinatum Pursh FAC- FAC NI FAC-,FAC Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FAC FACU FACU* FAC FACU FACU*,FAC Acer grandidentatum Nutt.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Management Guidelines for Four Habitats and Associated
    Integrated Management Guidelines for Four Habitats and Associated State Endangered Plants and Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need in the Skylands and Pinelands Landscape Conservation Zones of the New Jersey State Wildlife Action Plan Prepared by Elizabeth A. Johnson Center for Biodiversity and Conservation American Museum of Natural History Central Park West at 79th Street New York, NY 10024 and Kathleen Strakosch Walz New Jersey Natural Heritage Program New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection State Forestry Services Office of Natural Lands Management 501 East State Street, 4th Floor MC501-04, PO Box 420 Trenton, NJ 08625-0420 For NatureServe 4600 N. Fairfax Drive – 7th Floor Arlington, VA 22203 Project #DDF-0F-001a Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (Plants) June 2013 NatureServe # DDCF-0F-001a Integrated Management Plans for Four Habitats in NJ SWAP Page | 1 Acknowledgments: Many thanks to the following for sharing their expertise to review and discuss portions of this report: Allen Barlow, John Bunnell, Bob Cartica, Dave Jenkins, Sharon Petzinger, Dale Schweitzer, David Snyder, Mick Valent, Sharon Wander, Wade Wander, Andy Windisch, and Brian Zarate. This report should be cited as follows: Johnson, Elizabeth A. and Kathleen Strakosch Walz. 2013. Integrated Management Guidelines for Four Habitats and Associated State Endangered Plants and Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need in the Skylands and Pinelands Landscape Conservation Zones of the New Jersey State Wildlife Action Plan. American Museum of Natural History, Center for Biodiversity and Conservation and New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Natural Heritage Program, for NatureServe, Arlington, VA. 149p. NatureServe # DDCF-0F-001a Integrated Management Plans for Four Habitats in NJ SWAP Page | 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Project Summary………………………………………………………………………………………..….
    [Show full text]
  • NJ Native Plants - USDA
    NJ Native Plants - USDA Scientific Name Common Name N/I Family Category National Wetland Indicator Status Thermopsis villosa Aaron's rod N Fabaceae Dicot Rubus depavitus Aberdeen dewberry N Rosaceae Dicot Artemisia absinthium absinthium I Asteraceae Dicot Aplectrum hyemale Adam and Eve N Orchidaceae Monocot FAC-, FACW Yucca filamentosa Adam's needle N Agavaceae Monocot Gentianella quinquefolia agueweed N Gentianaceae Dicot FAC, FACW- Rhamnus alnifolia alderleaf buckthorn N Rhamnaceae Dicot FACU, OBL Medicago sativa alfalfa I Fabaceae Dicot Ranunculus cymbalaria alkali buttercup N Ranunculaceae Dicot OBL Rubus allegheniensis Allegheny blackberry N Rosaceae Dicot UPL, FACW Hieracium paniculatum Allegheny hawkweed N Asteraceae Dicot Mimulus ringens Allegheny monkeyflower N Scrophulariaceae Dicot OBL Ranunculus allegheniensis Allegheny Mountain buttercup N Ranunculaceae Dicot FACU, FAC Prunus alleghaniensis Allegheny plum N Rosaceae Dicot UPL, NI Amelanchier laevis Allegheny serviceberry N Rosaceae Dicot Hylotelephium telephioides Allegheny stonecrop N Crassulaceae Dicot Adlumia fungosa allegheny vine N Fumariaceae Dicot Centaurea transalpina alpine knapweed N Asteraceae Dicot Potamogeton alpinus alpine pondweed N Potamogetonaceae Monocot OBL Viola labradorica alpine violet N Violaceae Dicot FAC Trifolium hybridum alsike clover I Fabaceae Dicot FACU-, FAC Cornus alternifolia alternateleaf dogwood N Cornaceae Dicot Strophostyles helvola amberique-bean N Fabaceae Dicot Puccinellia americana American alkaligrass N Poaceae Monocot Heuchera americana
    [Show full text]
  • November 2009 an Analysis of Possible Risk To
    Project Title An Analysis of Possible Risk to Threatened and Endangered Plant Species Associated with Glyphosate Use in Alfalfa: A County-Level Analysis Authors Thomas Priester, Ph.D. Rick Kemman, M.S. Ashlea Rives Frank, M.Ent. Larry Turner, Ph.D. Bernalyn McGaughey David Howes, Ph.D. Jeffrey Giddings, Ph.D. Stephanie Dressel Data Requirements Pesticide Assessment Guidelines Subdivision E—Hazard Evaluation: Wildlife and Aquatic Organisms Guideline Number 70-1-SS: Special Studies—Effects on Endangered Species Date Completed August 22, 2007 Prepared by Compliance Services International 7501 Bridgeport Way West Lakewood, WA 98499-2423 (253) 473-9007 Sponsor Monsanto Company 800 N. Lindbergh Blvd. Saint Louis, MO 63167 Project Identification Compliance Services International Study 06711 Monsanto Study ID CS-2005-125 RD 1695 Volume 3 of 18 Page 1 of 258 Threatened & Endangered Plant Species Analysis CSI 06711 Glyphosate/Alfalfa Monsanto Study ID CS-2005-125 Page 2 of 258 STATEMENT OF NO DATA CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIMS The text below applies only to use of the data by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) in connection with the provisions of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) No claim of confidentiality is made for any information contained in this study on the basis of its falling within the scope of FIFRA §10(d)(1)(A), (B), or (C). We submit this material to the United States Environmental Protection Agency specifically under the requirements set forth in FIFRA as amended, and consent to the use and disclosure of this material by EPA strictly in accordance with FIFRA. By submitting this material to EPA in accordance with the method and format requirements contained in PR Notice 86-5, we reserve and do not waive any rights involving this material that are or can be claimed by the company notwithstanding this submission to EPA.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY
    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Ackerfield, J., and J. Wen. 2002. A morphometric analysis of Hedera L. (the ivy genus, Araliaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Adansonia 24: 197-212. Adams, P. 1961. Observations on the Sagittaria subulata complex. Rhodora 63: 247-265. Adams, R.M. II, and W.J. Dress. 1982. Nodding Lilium species of eastern North America (Liliaceae). Baileya 21: 165-188. Adams, R.P. 1986. Geographic variation in Juniperus silicicola and J. virginiana of the Southeastern United States: multivariant analyses of morphology and terpenoids. Taxon 35: 31-75. ------. 1995. Revisionary study of Caribbean species of Juniperus (Cupressaceae). Phytologia 78: 134-150. ------, and T. Demeke. 1993. Systematic relationships in Juniperus based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). Taxon 42: 553-571. Adams, W.P. 1957. A revision of the genus Ascyrum (Hypericaceae). Rhodora 59: 73-95. ------. 1962. Studies in the Guttiferae. I. A synopsis of Hypericum section Myriandra. Contr. Gray Herbarium Harv. 182: 1-51. ------, and N.K.B. Robson. 1961. A re-evaluation of the generic status of Ascyrum and Crookea (Guttiferae). Rhodora 63: 10-16. Adams, W.P. 1973. Clusiaceae of the southeastern United States. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 89: 62-71. Adler, L. 1999. Polygonum perfoliatum (mile-a-minute weed). Chinquapin 7: 4. Aedo, C., J.J. Aldasoro, and C. Navarro. 1998. Taxonomic revision of Geranium sections Batrachioidea and Divaricata (Geraniaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 594-630. Affolter, J.M. 1985. A monograph of the genus Lilaeopsis (Umbelliferae). Systematic Bot. Monographs 6. Ahles, H.E., and A.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Variation in the Genus Hudsonia Marion T. Hall, Butler University Hudsonia, in the small family Cistaceae, contains three species all restricted to North America where they grow in sandy areas. These plants are small xerophytic shrubs, rather bushy with fine heath-like foliage, bearing leaves which are downy, small, sessile, appressed, per- sistent and alternate on the stems and bearing many bright-yellow flowers, borne singly at the ends of short branches. The most widely distributed species, Hudsonia tomentosa (commonly called Beach-heath), occurs from Nova Scotia south along the Atlantic coast to Virginia and west along lake-shores, river-banks, and sand-hills to northern Alberta and south to the southern shores of Lake Michigan and Lake Erie. Hudsonia ericoides (known as Golden-heather) is the type species and occurs in Newfoundland, Prince Edward Island, and along the Atlantic to Virginia. The most restricted species, Hudsonia montana apparently occurs only on Table Mountain in North Carolina. On the sandy shores of Lake Pleasant, Hamilton Co., New York, Charles H. Peck, State Botanist of New York, in 1891 found a plant closely resembling H. tomentosa. He wrote in the New York State Museum Report, "The plants in their remarkably inland station differ so much from the typical form of the species that I am disposed to consider them a good variety. They are intermediate between H. tomen- tosa and H. ericoides and may therefore bear the name var. intermedia. Stems and branches more slender and longer; leaves narrow, less im- bricating and less tomentose; flowers or pedicels mostly a little longer than the leaves." Since Peck's description the var.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
    Monday, November 9, 2009 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Native Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notice of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions; Proposed Rule VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:08 Nov 06, 2009 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\09NOP3.SGM 09NOP3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS3 57804 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 215 / Monday, November 9, 2009 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR October 1, 2008, through September 30, for public inspection by appointment, 2009. during normal business hours, at the Fish and Wildlife Service We request additional status appropriate Regional Office listed below information that may be available for in under Request for Information in 50 CFR Part 17 the 249 candidate species identified in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. General [Docket No. FWS-R9-ES-2009-0075; MO- this CNOR. information we receive will be available 9221050083–B2] DATES: We will accept information on at the Branch of Candidate this Candidate Notice of Review at any Conservation, Arlington, VA (see Endangered and Threatened Wildlife time. address above). and Plants; Review of Native Species ADDRESSES: This notice is available on Candidate Notice of Review That Are Candidates for Listing as the Internet at http:// Endangered or Threatened; Annual www.regulations.gov, and http:// Background Notice of Findings on Resubmitted endangered.fws.gov/candidates/ The Endangered Species Act of 1973, Petitions; Annual Description of index.html.
    [Show full text]
  • SWAMP PINK Scientific Name: Helonias Bullata Linnaeus Other
    Common Name: SWAMP PINK Scientific Name: Helonias bullata Linnaeus Other Commonly Used Names: none Previously Used Scientific Names: none Family: Heloniadaceae (swamp pink), Melanthiaceae (bunchflower), or Liliaceae (lily) Rarity Ranks: G3/S1 State Legal Status: Threatened Federal Legal Status: Threatened Federal Wetland Status: OBL Description: Perennial herb often forming dense patches of large basal rosettes connected by underground stems. Leaves 3½ - 12 inches (9 - 30 cm) long and up to 1½ inches (4 cm) wide, glossy, evergreen, widest above the middle with pointed tips and tapering bases. Stem 1 - 2 feet (30 - 60 cm) tall while flowering, taller during fruiting, rising from the center of each rosette, stout, hollow. Flowers about inch (1 cm) wide, with 6 pink tepals (3 sepals + 3 petals) and six blue stamens, in a dense spike of 30 - 50 fragrant flowers at the top of the stem. Fruit inch long, 3-lobed, heart-shaped, papery, with many winged seeds. Similar Species: In flower, swamp pink is unmistakable. Fly poison (Amianthium muscitoxicum), which produces basal rosettes in the same habitats as swamp-pink, has white flowers and stiff, dull green leaves less than 1 inch (2.8 cm) wide, with conspicuous veins. Related Rare Species: None in Georgia. Habitat: Shady seepage swamps and sphagnum bogs with continually saturated, though not flooded, soils; often occurs with red maple, purple pitcherplant, mountain laurel, rosebay rhododendron, and tag alder. Life History: Swamp pink is a perennial herb that overwinters as a rosette of reddish-brown leaves. New leaves appear in the early spring, shortly before the flowering stalk elongates, and continue to enlarge during the spring and summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating the Conservation of Plant Species of Concern in the New Jersey State Wildlife Action Plan
    Integrating the Conservation of Plant Species of Concern in the New Jersey State Wildlife Action Plan Prepared by Kathleen Strakosch Walz New Jersey Natural Heritage Program New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection State Forestry Services Office of Natural Lands Management 501 East State Street, 4th Floor MC501-04, PO Box 420 Trenton, NJ 08625-0420 For NatureServe 4600 N. Fairfax Drive – 7th Floor Arlington, VA 22203 Project #DDF-0F-001a Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (Plants) June 2013 NatureServe # DDCF-0F-001a Integration of Plants into NJ SWAP Page | 1 Suggested citation: Walz, Kathleen S. 2013. Integrating the Conservation of Plant Species of Concern in the New Jersey State Wildlife Action Plan. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Natural Lands Management, MC501-04, Trenton, NJ 08625 for NatureServe #DDCF-0F-001a, 12p. Cover Photographs: Top Row: Spreading globeflower (Trollius laxus spp. Laxus) in calcareous fen habitat; Appalachian Mountain boltonia ( Boltonia montana) in calcareous sinkhole pond habitat of the Skylands Landscape Regional Landscape (photographs by Kathleen Strakosch Walz) Bottom Row: Bog asphodel (Narthecium americanum) in Pine Barren riverside savanna habitat; Reversed bladderwort (Utricularia resupinata) in coastal plain intermittent pond habitat of the Pinelands Regional Landscape (photographs by Renee Brecht) NatureServe # DDCF-0F-001a Integration of Plants into NJ SWAP Page | 2 PROJECT SUMMARY Overall purpose/intent: New Jersey is the first state projected to reach build-out, and pressure from competing land use interests and associated threats is high on the remaining open space. Therefore it is imperative to strategically protect and manage these natural areas for resiliency, as it is on these lands where the future of conservation lies for plants, animals and their critical habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity in Fruit and Seed Characters of Chamaelirium and Chionographis (Melanthiaceae)
    Taiwania 62(1): 67‒74, 2017 DOI: 10.6165/tai.2017.62.67 Diversity in fruit and seed characters of Chamaelirium and Chionographis (Melanthiaceae) Noriyuki TANAKA 98-11 Otsuka, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0352 Japan. Email: [email protected] (Manuscript received 22 August 2016; accepted 26 January 2017; online published 22 February 2017) ABSTRACT: Phenotypic characters of fruits and seeds of two closely allied genera Chamaelirium and Chionographis (Melanthiaceae) are reexamined. The results show that the two genera differ mainly in the number of ovules per locule, the shape of seeds, and the arrangement of seeds within the locule and of a seed body within the testa. Evidence also shows that in Chionographis a Chinese species (C. chinensis) significantly differ from three species from Japan and Korea (e.g. C. japonica) chiefly by the seeds acutely beaked proximally and in the narrowly obovoid, proximally cuneate fruits (capsules) that ripen in May to June (vs. autumn) and have a carpo-gynophore and locules mutually free, acute, and indehiscent in the proximal part. Data obtained is discussed from taxonomical and evolutionary aspects. KEY WORDS: Carpo-gynophore, Chamaelirium, Chionographis, Fruits, Diversity, Evolution, Melanthiaceae, Seeds, Taxonomy. INTRODUCTION length, and accordingly, they are taxonomically inseparable in this respect. Chionographis Maxim. (Melanthiaceae) is a genus of As for their fruits and seeds, the two genera approximately eight species distributed in Vietnam, Laos, reportedly differ in the number of ovules per locule and China, Japan and Korea (Tanaka, 2016a, b; Wu, 2016). It in the shape of seeds, as aforementioned. Previous is regarded as most closely allied to a monotypic genus reports also indicate that the size of capsules and the Chamaelirium Willd.
    [Show full text]