DOCSLIB.ORG

Aquascapes Unlimited, Inc. Contract Growing to Ensure the Availability of Large Quantities of Wetland Or P.O

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aquascapes Unlimited, Inc. Contract Growing to Ensure the Availability of Large Quantities of Wetland Or P.O A P 640 GE A O. T STD N QUASCAPES AID A P PRST .S.POS U PERMIT DOYLESTOWN, UNLIMITED, INC. Native WHOLESALE r NUR SER Y Y C A T ALO G “The most complete source . for native herbaceous NC , I wetland aquatic & carnivorous plants.” NLIMITED Phone: 215-766-8151 U 18947 Fax: 215-766-8986 A P 364 Box Vol. 16 QUASCAPES .O. A P Pipersville, www . a q u a s capesunlimit ed. com Aquascapes Unlimited, Inc. Contract Growing To ensure the availability of large quantities of wetland or P.O. Box 364 • Pipersville, PA 18947 ornamental species, Aquascapes Unlimited will accept Phone: 215-766-8151 • Fax: 215-766-8986 orders for plant materials to be grown to ANSI standards or email: [email protected] any other specifications and delivered up to a year or more website: www.aquascapesunlimited.com in the future. For more information on contract growing please contact our nursery manager or website. Aquascapes Unlimited, a grower and supplier of herbaceous wetland perennial aquatic plants and fish, provides a wholesale source for local ecotype Claims Plant materials received in unsatisfactory condition native wetland plants for restoration projects. or poor quality must be reported within 2 days of receipt. Liability is limited to replacement or credit. Our company has been specializing in lake, pond and wetland management for estate, institutional, governmental and commercial Terms establishments for over 3 decades with hundreds of • Minimum order - $200 – wholesale only satisfied clients. • All prices F.O.B. Pipersville, PA • Prices may be subject to change without notice. Aquascapes Unlimited offers consultation • Unless you have established credit, all sales services explaining what, where, how, and when to must be paid in full at time of delivery. plant aquatic material. • No sales will be made to accounts past due. • A service charge of 2% (24% per anum) will The majority of our plants are seed sown winter automatically be placed on all past due accounts. hardy perennials grown in containers to provide easy • Plants ordered and not picked up at scheduled shipping, storage and installation. date will be subject to restocking charge. Our established plants in plugs provide superior quality to bare root plants at competitive prices. Delivery Price within 25 miles The price list reflects plants in appropriately Minimum Sales amount Price sized containers unless otherwise specified. Large $200 $1.00 per mile plant specimens are available for some species listed. We are actively working towards being peat free Price outside 25 miles when applicable. Minimum Sales Amount Price $500 $1.00 per mile Sincerely, Price outside 50 miles Randolph Heffner Minimum Sales Amount Price President $1000 $1.00 per mile www . a q u a s capesunlimit ed. com www . a q u a s capesunlimit ed. com Native Wetland & Aquatic Plants for: - Restoration RETAIL READY NATIVE WETLAND PLANTS - Storm Water Management ® BUG OUT Native herbaceous wetland plants provide the backbone of any - ErosioCARNIVORESn Control IN CAPTIVITY successful wetland restoration project. Most grow rapidly via vegetative methods and seed readily. Planting a diverse group of - RaBugin G aOutrden®s is a new marketing concept by Aquascapes species with similar hydrological adaptability most often produces - Unlimited,Ponds/Lake sInc./Stre designedams to promote, educate and profound results in the 1st growing season. preserve carnivorous plants and their environment. The Please find below the currently available seed sown, nursery grown - uniqueBasins recyclable/ Swales packaging and informative literature containerized natives. These plants are available for immediate resale makes the hottest new plants in horticulture affordable, or installation into wet meadows, riparian corridors or other ecologically - eBixcoiti-rnegm aendi aeastioyn. sensitive areas where biodiversity is essential. Aquascapes Unlimited's association and partnership KEY TO SYMBOLS Online Plantwith Sea rnon-profitch Databas econservation for Installer sorganizations, Designers, Ed helpsucato rtos & Engineers OBL : Obligate Wetland Species: Occur almost always (estimated preserve and protect the natural communities where probability >99%) under natural conditions in wetlands. FACW : Facultative Wetland Species: Usually occur in wetlands (estimated these rare North American beauties thrive. probability 67% - 99%), but occasionally found in non-wetlands. * Mini green house packaging FAC : Facultative Species: Equally likely to occur in wetlands or Contract Growing - plant materials grown to specifications. non-wetlands (estimated probability 34% - 66%). * Ship anywhere in the U.S. FACU : Faculltative Upland Species: Usually occur in non-wetlands but * Free marketing materials & POP support occasionally found in wetlands (estimated probability 1% - 33%. Email, fax, or call for a quote and availability. UPL : Obligate Upland Species: Almost always occur (estimated probability>99%) under natural conditions in non-wetlands. No Indicator: Lack of information to determine indicator status. We Contract Grow NI : (A positive sign [+] indicates more of a frequency to be found in Simple Plug Spacing Chart – On Center wetlands and a negative sign [-] indicates less of a frequency to be found in wetlands). Total sq. ft. of bed 12” 18” 24” 36” 50 50 22 13 6 100 100 44 25 11 BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME INDICATOR #1 4” PLUG 250 250 110 63 28 Acorus americanus Sweet Flag OBL 5.00 2.50 .75 Alisma plantago aquatica Water Plantain OBL 5.00 2.50 .80 500 500 220 125 55 Andropogon gerardii Big Blue Stem FACW+ 4.50 2.35 .75 1,000 1,000 440 250 110 Andropogon glomeratus Bushy Beard OBL 4.50 2.35 .75 5,000 5,000 2,200 1,250 550 Andropogon virginicus Broomsedge FACU 4.50 2.35 .75 Asclepias incarnata Swamp Milkweed OBL 5.00 2.35 .80 10,000 10,000 4,400 2,500 1,100 Symphotrichum novae-angliae New England Aster FACW- 5.00 2.35 .75 Multiplier (1) (.44) (.25) (.11) Symphotrichum no vi-belgii New York Aster FACW+ 5.00 2.35 .75 Symphotrichum puniceus Purple Stemmed Aster OBL 5.00 2.35 .80 Plant Materials Grown To Specifications Calamagrostis canadensis Canada Bluejoint FACW+ 5.00 2.25 .75 Free Online Plant Search Database Caltha palustris Marsh Marigold OBL 5.00 3.00 1.25 Carex aquatilis Water Sedge OBL 5.00 2.35 .80 Serving Installers, Designers, Educators & Engineers Carex comosa Bristly Sedge OBL 5.00 2.35 .75 Website: Carex crinita Fringed Sedge OBL 5.00 2.35 .75 Email,Aq fax,uas corap calles U nforlim itae dquote Inc. and availability www.aquascapesunCalirmexi thyedst.rcico inma Porcupine Sed ge OBL 5.00 2.35 .75 P.O. Box 364 • Pipersville, PA 18947 Carex intumescens Bladder Sedge FACW+ 5.00 2.35 .80 Phone: 215-766-8151 • Fax: 215-766-8986 Social Media: Carex lacustris Lake Bank Sedge OBL 5.00 2.35 .85 INTERNSHIPS AVAILABLE Carex lupulina Hop Sedge FACW+ 5.00 2.35 .80 email: www.facebook.com/wetlandperennials info@aquaPartscapesun ltime/Fullimited.com time Carex lurida Lurid Sedge OBL 5.00 2.35 .75 Carex muskingumensis Musk Sedge OBL 5.00 2.35 .75 www . a q u a s capesunlimit ed. com www . a q u a s capesunlimit ed. com 8 1 Native Wetland Plants UNC HYBRIDS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME INDICATOR #1 4” PLUG BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SMALL MED. LARGE XL Carex scoparia Pointed Broom Sedge FACW 5.00 2.35 .75 Sarracenia x UNC Hybrid ‘Dixie Lace’ 1.95 4.95 9.95 16.95 Carex stricta Tussock Sedge OBL 5.00 2.35 .75 Sarracenia x UNC Hybrid ‘Doodle Bug’ - - 9.95 16.95 Carex vulpinoidea Fox Sedge OBL 5.00 2.35 .70 Sarracenia x UNC Hybrid ‘June Bug’ 1.95 4.95 9.95 16.95 Sarracenia x UNC Hybrid ‘Lady Bug’ - 4.95 9.95 16.95 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush OBL 6.00 3.00 .95 Sarracenia x UNC Hybrid ‘Love Bug’ - 4.95 9.95 16.95 Chasmanthium latifolium Northern Seaoats FACU 4.50 2.35 .75 Sarracenia x UNC Hybrid ‘Mardi Gras’ 2.95 4.95 9.95 16.95 Chelone glabra White Turtle Head OBL 5.00 2.65 .80 Sarracenia x UNC Hybrid ‘Red Bug’ 1.95 4.95 9.95 16.95 Cinna arundinacea Wood Reedgrass FACW+ 5.00 2.35 .75 Cyperus esculentus Nut Sedge FACW 5.00 2.35 .75 OTHER CARNIVORES Decodon verticillata Water Willow OBL 5.50 2.65 .80 BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SMALL MED. Dulichium arundinaceum Dwarf Bamboo OBL 5.00 2.35 .85 Dionea muscipula Venus Fly Trap 1.95 6.50 Eleocharis acicularis Least Spikerush OBL 5.00 2.35 .80 Drosera binata Fork Leaf Sundew 2.95 6.95 Eleocharis obtusa Spike Rush OBL 5.00 2.35 .75 Drosera capensis Cape Sundew 1.25 6.50 Eleocharis parvula Dwarf Spike R ush OBL 5.00 2.50 .75 Drosera liformis Thread Leaf Sundew 1.25 6.50 Eleocharis palustris Creeping Spike Rush OBL 5.00 2.35 .75 Drosera liformis var. Tracyi Giant Thread Leaf Sundew 2.95 12.00 Eleocharis quadrangulata Four Square Rush OBL 5.50 3.00 .95 Drosera intermedia Spatulate Leaf Sundew 1.25 6.50 Elymus hystrix Bottle Brush Grass NI 4.50 2.35 .80 Drosera rotundifolia Round Leaf Sundew 1.25 6.50 Elymus riparius River Bank Wild Rye FACW- 4.50 2.35 .80 Elymus virginicus Virginia Wild Rye FACW- 4.50 2.25 .80 CARNIVOROUS COMPANIONS Equisetum uviatile Water Horsetail OBL 6.00 3.00 .95 BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NA ME SMALL MED. Equisetum hyemale Horsetail FACW 5.50 3.00 .95 Calopogon tuberousa alba Grass Pink Orchid (white) - 15.00 Equisetum scorpoides Dwarf Horsetail FAC 5.50 3.00 .85 Calopogon tuberousa Grass Pink Orchid - 12.50 Eryngium aquaticum Marsh Rattlesnake- master OBL 5.50 3.00 .90 Gentiana autumnalis Pine Barrens Gentian - 12.50 Eutrochium stulosum Joe Pie Weed FACW 5.00 2.35 .75 Lachnocaulon minus Small’s Bog Button 1.25 3.50 Lophiola americana Golden-Crest - 12.50 Eupatorium perfoliatum Boneset FACW 5.00 2.35 .75 Lysmachia terrestris Swamp Candles 1.25 3.50 Glyceria canadensis Canada Manna Grass OBL 5.00 2.35 .75 Narthecium americanum Bog asphodel - 12.50 Glyceria striata Fowl Mannagrass OBL 5.00 2.35 .75 Polygala lutea Orange Milkwort 1.50 4.50 Helianthus angustifolius Swamp Sunower FACW 5.00 2.75 .85 Sabatia kennedyana Marsh Pink 1.50 4.50 Heliopsis helianthoides Ox-Eye Sunower NI 5.00 2.75 .80 Spiranthes odorata Ladies Tress Orchid 1.25 3.50 Heteranthera limnosa Upright Mud Plantain OBL 5.00 2.65 BR Triadenum virginicum Marsh St.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE
    Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Common Native & Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska
    Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska Cover photographs by (top to bottom, left to right): Tara Chestnut/Hannah E. Anderson, Jamie Fenneman, Vanessa Morgan, Dana Visalli, Jamie Fenneman, Lynda K. Moore and Denny Lassuy. Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska This document is based on An Aquatic Plant Identification Manual for Washington’s Freshwater Plants, which was modified with permission from the Washington State Department of Ecology, by the Center for Lakes and Reservoirs at Portland State University for Alaska Department of Fish and Game US Fish & Wildlife Service - Coastal Program US Fish & Wildlife Service - Aquatic Invasive Species Program December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ............................................................................ x Introduction Overview ............................................................................. xvi How to Use This Manual .................................................... xvi Categories of Special Interest Imperiled, Rare and Uncommon Aquatic Species ..................... xx Indigenous Peoples Use of Aquatic Plants .............................. xxi Invasive Aquatic Plants Impacts ................................................................................. xxi Vectors ................................................................................. xxii Prevention Tips .................................................... xxii Early Detection and Reporting
    [Show full text]
  • In Planta Expression of Exocellulase Enzymes for Bio-Ethanol Production
    In planta expression of exocellulase enzymes for Bio-ethanol production A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Parsu Ram Budathoki Degree of Bachelor of Science, University of North Bengal, India Master of Science in Biotechnology, Bangalore University, India School of Science College of Science, Engineering and Health RMIT University March 2018 Declaration I certify that except where due acknowledgement has been made, the work is that of the author alone; the work has not been submitted previously, in whole or in part, to qualify for any other academic award; the content of the thesis is the result of work which has been carried out since the official commencement date of the approved research program; any editorial work, paid or unpaid, carried out by a third party is acknowledged; and, ethics procedures and guidelines have been followed. Parsu Ram Budathoki Date: 13/03/2018 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank my senior supervisor, Professor Trevor Stevenson for his help and advice during the period of research. I also thank my secondary supervisor Dr Gregory Nugent for his guidance and assistance. I thank Professor David Stalker for many useful discussions. I am indebted to Mrs. Kim Stevenson for her assistance and guidance in my laboratory work. I also thank Dr. Chung Hong Chen (former CSIRO Scientist) for providing me with plasmids and helping me in the cloning vectors. I acknowledge Dr. Chaitali Dekiwadia for assistance in sample preparation and imaging of TEM work at RMIT Microscopy and Microanalysis Facility. The research described in this thesis was carried on while I held a research scholarship from the ARC Linkage grant in partnership with Biomass Conversion Technologies, was funded from Chevron Technology Ventures in USA is gratefully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Vascular Plant Species Distribution Maps
    Appendix 11.5.1: Aquatic Vascular Plant Species Distribution Maps These distribution maps are for 116 aquatic vascular macrophyte species (Table 1). Aquatic designation follows habitat descriptions in Haines and Vining (1998), and includes submergent, floating and some emergent species. See Appendix 11.4 for list of species. Also included in Appendix 11.4 is the number of HUC-10 watersheds from which each taxon has been recorded, and the county-level distributions. Data are from nine sources, as compiled in the MABP database (plus a few additional records derived from ancilliary information contained in reports from two fisheries surveys in the Upper St. John basin organized by The Nature Conservancy). With the exception of the University of Maine herbarium records, most locations represent point samples (coordinates were provided in data sources or derived by MABP from site descriptions in data sources). The herbarium data are identified only to township. In the species distribution maps, town-level records are indicated by center-points (centroids). Figure 1 on this page shows as polygons the towns where taxon records are identified only at the town level. Data Sources: MABP ID MABP DataSet Name Provider 7 Rare taxa from MNAP lake plant surveys D. Cameron, MNAP 8 Lake plant surveys D. Cameron, MNAP 35 Acadia National Park plant survey C. Greene et al. 63 Lake plant surveys A. Dieffenbacher-Krall 71 Natural Heritage Database (rare plants) MNAP 91 University of Maine herbarium database C. Campbell 183 Natural Heritage Database (delisted species) MNAP 194 Rapid bioassessment surveys D. Cameron, MNAP 207 Invasive aquatic plant records MDEP Maps are in alphabetical order by species name.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuphar Lutea
    1186 Notizen Oxygen Supply of Roots by Gas Transport to aerate their roots in wet soil and during periods in Alder-Trees of early spring floodings. Wolfgang Große und Peter Schröder Botanisches Institut der Universität zu Köln, Gyrhof- Materials and Methods straße 15, D-5000 Köln 41, Bundesrepublik Deutschland Studies were conducted on six- to twelve-month- Z. Naturforsch. 39 c, 1186 -1188 (1984); old alder-trees (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertner) cul­ received August 3/September 6, 1984 tivated in the tree-nursery and transfered to a green­ Ainus glutinosa, Gas Transport, Oxygen Supply, house during the winter. Root Aeration, Thermo-Osmosis of Gases For the assays the young trees were inserted in an It is generally accepted that oxygen diffuses according to experimental glass chamber (Fig. 1) which is sepa­ the gradient of its partial pressure from the surface of the rated into two compartments by a sealing com­ plants into the heterotrophic tissues through the inter­ cellular spaces. The present experiments show evidence of pound (Carlofon, Cologne, W. Germany) and a an additional manifold higher oxygen supply due to a gas water trap. transport in leaved as well as leafless trees of Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertner. This gas transport is directed from The experiments were carried out either when the the stems to the roots. It is driven by a thermo-osmotic plants were equilibrated to room temperature or pressurisation within the air space system of the stems, when the plants obtained a specific temperature resulting from temperature gradients up to 3.6 K between the stem and the ambient air following the absorption of gradient between the inside of the stems and the light energy by the brownish pigments of the bark.
    [Show full text]
  • White Waterlily Nymphaea Odorata Ssp. Odorata Ait
    white waterlily Nymphaea odorata ssp. odorata Ait. Synonyms: Castalia lekophylla Small, C. minor (Sims) Nyar, C. odorata (Ait.) Wood, C. reniformis DC., Nymphaea minor (Sims) DC., N. odorata var. gigantea Tricker, N. odorata var. godfreyi Ward, N. odorata var. minor Sims, N. odorata var. rosea Pursh, N. odorata var. stenopetala Fern., N. odorata var. villosa Caspary Other common names: fragrant waterlily, American waterlily, American white waterlily Family: Nymphaeaceae Invasiveness Rank: 80 The invasiveness rank is calculated based on a species’ ecological impacts, biological attributes, distribution, and response to control measures. The ranks are scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 representing a plant that poses no threat to native ecosystems and 100 representing a plant that poses a major threat to native ecosystems. Description oblong or heart-shaped leaves. Unlike white waterlily, White waterlily is an aquatic, perennial plant with watershield (Brasenia schreberi J.F. Gmel.) has petioles floating leaves and branched, creeping rhizomes. The that attach to its leaves in the center of the blades rhizomes are densely covered with short black hairs and (Hultén 1968, Hitchcock and Cronquist 1990, are about 2 ½ cm in diameter. Mature leaves are often DiTomaso and Healy 2003, eFloras 2008). round, smooth, and up to 30 ½ cm in diameter. They are frequently purple on the lower surface and have a slit on Ecological Impact one side. Straight, flexible stalks attach leaves and Impact on community composition, structure, and flowers to thick, submerged rhizomes. Flowers are interactions: White waterlily tends to form dense, borne at or slightly above the surface of the water. They floating mats of vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Management Guidelines for Four Habitats and Associated
    Integrated Management Guidelines for Four Habitats and Associated State Endangered Plants and Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need in the Skylands and Pinelands Landscape Conservation Zones of the New Jersey State Wildlife Action Plan Prepared by Elizabeth A. Johnson Center for Biodiversity and Conservation American Museum of Natural History Central Park West at 79th Street New York, NY 10024 and Kathleen Strakosch Walz New Jersey Natural Heritage Program New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection State Forestry Services Office of Natural Lands Management 501 East State Street, 4th Floor MC501-04, PO Box 420 Trenton, NJ 08625-0420 For NatureServe 4600 N. Fairfax Drive – 7th Floor Arlington, VA 22203 Project #DDF-0F-001a Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (Plants) June 2013 NatureServe # DDCF-0F-001a Integrated Management Plans for Four Habitats in NJ SWAP Page | 1 Acknowledgments: Many thanks to the following for sharing their expertise to review and discuss portions of this report: Allen Barlow, John Bunnell, Bob Cartica, Dave Jenkins, Sharon Petzinger, Dale Schweitzer, David Snyder, Mick Valent, Sharon Wander, Wade Wander, Andy Windisch, and Brian Zarate. This report should be cited as follows: Johnson, Elizabeth A. and Kathleen Strakosch Walz. 2013. Integrated Management Guidelines for Four Habitats and Associated State Endangered Plants and Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need in the Skylands and Pinelands Landscape Conservation Zones of the New Jersey State Wildlife Action Plan. American Museum of Natural History, Center for Biodiversity and Conservation and New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Natural Heritage Program, for NatureServe, Arlington, VA. 149p. NatureServe # DDCF-0F-001a Integrated Management Plans for Four Habitats in NJ SWAP Page | 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Project Summary………………………………………………………………………………………..….
    [Show full text]
  • NJ Native Plants - USDA
    NJ Native Plants - USDA Scientific Name Common Name N/I Family Category National Wetland Indicator Status Thermopsis villosa Aaron's rod N Fabaceae Dicot Rubus depavitus Aberdeen dewberry N Rosaceae Dicot Artemisia absinthium absinthium I Asteraceae Dicot Aplectrum hyemale Adam and Eve N Orchidaceae Monocot FAC-, FACW Yucca filamentosa Adam's needle N Agavaceae Monocot Gentianella quinquefolia agueweed N Gentianaceae Dicot FAC, FACW- Rhamnus alnifolia alderleaf buckthorn N Rhamnaceae Dicot FACU, OBL Medicago sativa alfalfa I Fabaceae Dicot Ranunculus cymbalaria alkali buttercup N Ranunculaceae Dicot OBL Rubus allegheniensis Allegheny blackberry N Rosaceae Dicot UPL, FACW Hieracium paniculatum Allegheny hawkweed N Asteraceae Dicot Mimulus ringens Allegheny monkeyflower N Scrophulariaceae Dicot OBL Ranunculus allegheniensis Allegheny Mountain buttercup N Ranunculaceae Dicot FACU, FAC Prunus alleghaniensis Allegheny plum N Rosaceae Dicot UPL, NI Amelanchier laevis Allegheny serviceberry N Rosaceae Dicot Hylotelephium telephioides Allegheny stonecrop N Crassulaceae Dicot Adlumia fungosa allegheny vine N Fumariaceae Dicot Centaurea transalpina alpine knapweed N Asteraceae Dicot Potamogeton alpinus alpine pondweed N Potamogetonaceae Monocot OBL Viola labradorica alpine violet N Violaceae Dicot FAC Trifolium hybridum alsike clover I Fabaceae Dicot FACU-, FAC Cornus alternifolia alternateleaf dogwood N Cornaceae Dicot Strophostyles helvola amberique-bean N Fabaceae Dicot Puccinellia americana American alkaligrass N Poaceae Monocot Heuchera americana
    [Show full text]
  • Native Or Invasive? Native and Invasive Aquatic Plants of the Eastern Lake Ontario Region
    Aquatic Invasive Species Resource Education Series 2011 Native or Invasive? Native and Invasive Aquatic Plants of the Eastern Lake Ontario Region Invasive aquatic plants can interfere with recreation and diminish wildlife and fish habitat. Knowing some of the common plants that are native to our waters may help you spot invasive plants before they grow out of control. Read on for a sampling of our native aquatic plants, as well as some invasives to recognize. Right: Wetland at Black Pond Wildlife Management Area, Jefferson County, NY. Photo: Greg Chapman, New York Sea Grant Native and invasive plants with leaves that float upon the surface of the water White water lily Water chestnut Nymphaea odorata Trapa natans Native plant Invasive plant Flowers: Large, white, Triangular toothed leaves many-petaled in floating “rosettes” Round “lily pad” leaves, Seeds (nutlets) with four 6-8 inches across sharp prongs Forms dense mats Photo: Greg Chapman, New York Sea Grant Photo: Greg Chapman, New York Sea Grant Yellow pond lily European frogbit Nuphar lutea Hydrocharis morsus-ranae Native plant Invasive plant Yellow, bulbous flowers Small round leaves, less rise above the water than 2 inches across Shield-shaped leaves, up Flowers: Small, white, to 16 inches long three-petaled Forms dense mats Photo: Greg Chapman, New York Sea Grant Photo: Greg Chapman, New York Sea Grant Native and Invasive Aquatic Plants of the Eastern Lake Ontario Region Native and invasive plants that grow mostly beneath the water’s surface Coon’s tail Eurasian watermilfoil Ceratophyllum demersum Myriophyllum spicatum Native plant Invasive plant Branched, bristle-like Feather-like leaves leaves 3-6 leaves arranged in Provides cover for fish whorls around stem Eaten by some waterfowl Forms dense mats that interfere with boating Drawing: USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database / Britton, N.L., and A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Utility of Nymphaeaceae Sclereids in Paleoenvironmental Research Robby R
    The Utility of Nymphaeaceae Sclereids in Paleoenvironmental Research Robby R. Marrotte Department of Geography, McGill University; Montréal (Québec) Canada 2011 Supervisor: Gail L. Chmura Reader: Elisabeth Levac As entomophilous plants, water lilies (Nymphaea) and spatterdocks (Nuphar) have low pollen production, thus can be under represented in the sediment record. These macrophytes produce distinctly shaped sclerenchyma tissue referred to as stone-cells, trichosclereids, astrosclereid or simply sclereids. This study examines the utility of using sclereids from common species from the Nymphaeaceae Family as an alternative proxy to their pollen. Histological studies of fresh tissues of Nymphaea odorata and Nuphar lutea revealed that each has distinct sclereids and that there has been confusion in the application of terminological used to designate their morphology. Some paleoecological reports have referred to Nymphaeaceae sclereids as trichosclereids, but our histological studies show that the cells are more appropriately classified as polyramous, astrosclereids, librosclereids and rhizosclereids. We also determined if palynological processing affects sclereid morphology or the efficiency of their retrieval. Tissues from both species were treated using HCL, KOH, acetolysis and HF and found that only the sclereids from N. lutea survived chemical treatments in a detectable form. Our study shows that sclereids from N. lutea can be a useful indicator of its presence while the chance of observing sclereids from N. odorata in pollen preparations is very low, severely limiting the utility of the latter as a paleoecological indicator. Another limitation to using sclereids as a proxy is that they originate from plant tissues, which require extended acetolysis treatments for; if they aren’t released from this matrix they stay hidden inside the tissue.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Quality Assessment Report
    FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN INDIANA: THE CONCEPT, USE, AND DEVELOPMENT OF COEFFICIENTS OF CONSERVATISM Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) the State tree of Indiana June 2004 Final Report for ARN A305-4-53 EPA Wetland Program Development Grant CD975586-01 Prepared by: Paul E. Rothrock, Ph.D. Taylor University Upland, IN 46989-1001 Introduction Since the early nineteenth century the Indiana landscape has undergone a massive transformation (Jackson 1997). In the pre-settlement period, Indiana was an almost unbroken blanket of forests, prairies, and wetlands. Much of the land was cleared, plowed, or drained for lumber, the raising of crops, and a range of urban and industrial activities. Indiana’s native biota is now restricted to relatively small and often isolated tracts across the State. This fragmentation and reduction of the State’s biological diversity has challenged Hoosiers to look carefully at how to monitor further changes within our remnant natural communities and how to effectively conserve and even restore many of these valuable places within our State. To meet this monitoring, conservation, and restoration challenge, one needs to develop a variety of appropriate analytical tools. Ideally these techniques should be simple to learn and apply, give consistent results between different observers, and be repeatable. Floristic Assessment, which includes metrics such as the Floristic Quality Index (FQI) and Mean C values, has gained wide acceptance among environmental scientists and decision-makers, land stewards, and restoration ecologists in Indiana’s neighboring states and regions: Illinois (Taft et al. 1997), Michigan (Herman et al. 1996), Missouri (Ladd 1996), and Wisconsin (Bernthal 2003) as well as northern Ohio (Andreas 1993) and southern Ontario (Oldham et al.
    [Show full text]