DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 5.3-1 Historic Resources Evaluation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 5.3-1 Historic Resources Evaluation Report FAMILY RESOURCES CENTE R AND DISTRICT POLIC E HEADQUARTERS PROJE CT D R A F T E I R SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTR ICT Appendices Appendix 5.3-1 Historic Resources Evaluation Report January 2019 FAMILY RESOURCES CEN TER AND DISTRICT POL ICE HEADQUARTERS PROJECT D R A F T E I R SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTR ICT Appendices This page intentionally left blank. PlaceWorks Architectural History Inventory and Evaluation Report San Bernardino City Unified School District Parent Center and District Police Headquarters Project in the City of San Bernardino San Bernardino County, California Prepared For: Placeworks, Inc. 3 MacArthur Place, Suite 100 Santa Ana, California 92707 Prepared By: Robert Cunningham ECORP Consulting, Inc. 215 North 5th Street Redlands, California 92374 Under the direction of Principal Investigator: Roger Mason, PhD, RPA Citation: ECORP Consulting, Inc. 2018. Architectural History Inventory and Evaluation Report for the San Bernardino City Unified School District Parent Center and District Police Headquarters Project. - Prepared for Placeworks, Santa Ana, California. ECORP Consulting, Inc. has assisted public and private land owners with environmental regulation compliance since 1987. We offer full service capability, from initial baseline environmental studies through environmental planning review, permitting negotiation, liaison to obtain legal agreements, mitigation design, and construction monitoring and reporting. Citation: ECORP Consulting, Inc. 2018. Architectural History Inventory and Evaluation Report for the San Bernardino City Unified School District Parent Center and District Police Headquarters Project. - Prepared for Placeworks, Santa Ana, California. Architectural History Inventory and Evaluation Report for the SBCUSD Parent Center and District Police Headquarters Project MANAGEMENT SUMMARY In 2018, ECORP Consulting, Inc. was retained to conduct an architectural history inventory and evaluation for the proposed Parent Center and District Police Headquarters Project (Project). San Bernardino City Unified School District proposes the construction of a new, 19,020-square-foot Centralized Services & Resource Center, a new 15,772-square-foot District Police Headquarters, and construction of four new parking lots. Construction of the new buildings and parking lots would require the removal of a surface parking lot, relocation of five portable buildings, and the demolition of two permanent buildings and one canopy structure. The inventory and evaluation included a records search, literature review, archival research, and field visit. The records search results indicated that one previous cultural resources study had been conducted within the Project area in 2000, and 82 investigations have occurred within a one-mile radius of the Project area between 1979 and 2014. The records search also revealed that one previously recorded historic-period resource, the Church of Christ, Scientist building (P36-017740), was located within the Project area, and more than 700 previously recorded resources are located within a one-mile radius of the Project Area. The majority of these are built environment resources consisting of historic-age buildings including houses, churches, and commercial structures, many of which are spread throughout five proposed local historic districts: the Norton and Hey Bennett Historic District, the Arrowhead Avenue Historic District, the 11th/Orange Streets Historic District, the East Olive Street Historic District, and the Walnut Park Historic District. As a result of the field visit, the previously recorded church building was updated (P36-017740), and one newly identified historic-period building, the Town Lodge Motel, was recorded. The Town Lodge Motel was evaluated using California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) eligibility criteria, and City of San Bernardino criteria for local historical significance. The Town Lodge Motel was found not eligible for inclusion in the CRHR and was evaluated as not meeting any criteria for local historical significance. The church building (P36-017740) was evaluated using CRHR eligibility criteria and was found to be not eligible for listing in the CRHR under any criteria. An evaluation using City of San Bernardino criteria for local historical significance confirmed the previous finding that the building meets criteria for local historical significance. As the building was found to be historically significant under local criteria, it is considered a Historical Resource as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act and the proposed Project will result in impacts to a Historical Resource. ECORP Consulting Inc. July 2018 SBCUSD Parent Center and Police HQ i 2018-088 Architectural History Inventory and Evaluation Report for the SBCUSD Parent Center and District Police Headquarters Project CONTENTS MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................... i 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Location ................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Description ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Regulatory Context ............................................................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Report Organization .......................................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 CULTURAL CONTEXT .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Regional Prehistory ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2.1.1 Paleo-Indian Period/Terminal Pleistocene (12,000 to 10,000 BP) ................................... 5 2.1.2 Early Archaic Period/Early Holocene (10,000 to 8,500 BP) ................................................. 5 2.1.3 Encinitas Tradition or Milling Stone Period/Middle Holocene (8,500 to 3,500 BP) . 5 2.1.4 Palomar Tradition (1,250 – 150 BP) ............................................................................................. 7 2.2 Ethnohistory .......................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 History ..................................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Transportation and U.S. Route 66 History .............................................................................................. 11 2.5 Motel History ..................................................................................................................................................... 13 2.6 Architectural Context ...................................................................................................................................... 14 2.6.1 Gothic Revival ................................................................................................................................... 14 2.6.2 Contemporary ................................................................................................................................... 14 3.0 METHODS ............................................................................................................................................................................ 14 3.1 Personnel Qualifications ................................................................................................................................ 14 3.2 Records Search Methods .............................................................................................................................. 15 3.3 Field Methods .................................................................................................................................................... 15 4.0 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................................................................ 16 4.1 Records Search .................................................................................................................................................. 16 4.1.1 Previous Research ........................................................................................................................... 16 4.2 Field Visit Results .............................................................................................................................................. 23 4.2.1 Previously Recorded Resources ................................................................................................. 23 4.2.2 Newly Identified Resources ......................................................................................................... 24 5.0 EVALUATION OF ELIGIBILITY .......................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cultural Resources Assessment
    CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT 10843 NEW JERSEY STREET INDUSTRIAL PROJECT CITY OF REDLANDS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA May 2020 CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT 10843 NEW JERSEY STREET INDUSTRIAL PROJECT CITY OF REDLANDS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Mr. Larry D. Cochrun 555 North El Camino Real, Suite A456 San Clemente, California 92672 Prepared by: Casey Tibbet, M.A. and Riordan Goodwin LSA Associates, Inc. 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200 Riverside, California 92507 (951) 781-9310 LSA Project No. CWW1902 National Archaeological Data Base Information: Type of Study: Records Search, Survey, Architectural Evaluation USGS Quadrangle: Redlands, California Acreage: 4.17 May 2020 C ULTURAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT 10843 N EW J ERSEY S TREET I NDUSTRIAL P ROJECT M A Y 2020 R EDLANDS, C ALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT SUMMARY LSA conducted a cultural resources assessment for the 10843 New Jersey Street Industrial Project located in the City of Redlands (City), San Bernardino County, California. The assessment included a records search, archival research, field surveys, and this report. The subject property is approximately four acres and is currently developed with a 1922 residence and related structures, as well as more than 700 citrus trees. The proposed project involves the removal of the citrus grove and related buildings to facilitate construction of an approximately 179,000-square foot concrete tilt-up warehouse building and related parking on two parcels to be merged into one. The City as Lead Agency for the project required this study as part of the environmental review process to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The purpose of the study is to provide the City with the necessary information and analysis to determine, as mandated by CEQA, whether the proposed project would cause substantial adverse changes to any historical/archaeological resources that may exist in or around the project area.
    [Show full text]
  • Application Materials: LAFCO Application and Sphere Supplement Forms
    Application Materials: LAFCO Application and Sphere Supplement Forms, LAFCO Resolution 3248, and Excerpts from Countywide Service Review for Water Attachment 2 __________________________3222 (FOR LAFCO USE ONLY) SAN BERNARDINO LAFCO APPLICATION AND PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTION FORM INTRODUCTION: The questions on this form and its supplements are designed to obtain enough data about the application to allow the San Bernardino LAFCO, its staff and others to adequately assess the proposal. By taking the time to fully respond to the questions on the forms, you can reduce the processing time for your proposal. You may also include any additional information which you believe is pertinent. Use additional sheets where necessary, or attach any relevant documents. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. NAME OF PROPOSAL: __________________________________________________________LAFCO 3222 - Sphere of Influence Establishment for ______________________________________________________________________________the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California ______________________________________________________________________________(within San Bernardino County) 2. NAME OF APPLICANT: __________________________________________________________Local Agency Formation Commission for San Bernardino County APPLICANT TYPE: Landowner Local Agency Registered Voter Other________________________________ MAILING ADDRESS: ______________________________________________________________________________1170 W. Third Street, Unit 150, San Bernardino, CA 92415-0490 ______________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Amendment #19-27
    October 13, 2020 Amendment #19‐27 Mr. Bruce De Terra Chief, Division of Transportation Programming Department of Transportation Transportation Programming, MS‐82 1120 “N” Street Sacramento, CA 94274‐0001 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT #19‐27 TO THE 2019 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FTIP) Dear Mr. De Terra: Under authority granted to me by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Council, I hereby approve and transmit amendment #19‐27 for projects in Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura Counties. Included in this amendment package is a narrative describing the projects being amended, project listing reports, and a financial plan. No conformity determination analysis was needed for any of the projects in this amendment. This amendment: Is consistent with the Connect SoCal ‐ 2020 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS); Does not affect the regional emissions analysis of the FTIP; Does not affect the timely implementation of the Transportation Control Measures; and Does not adversely impact financial constraint. Furthermore, SCAG through its function as the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has found the attached projects to conform to the applicable State Implementation Plan. In addition, SCAG has completed the interagency consultation and the public participation process for this amendment on October 8, 2020. No comments were received during the public review period. Page 2 Letter to Bruce De Terra October 13, 2020 If you have any questions, please contact Pablo Gutierrez of my staff at (213) 236‐1929 or via e‐mail at [email protected] Sincerely, SARAH JEPSON Director of Planning Enclosures SJ:pg cc: Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Spanish National Historic Trail Final Comprehensive Administrative Strategy
    Old Spanish National Historic Trail Final Comprehensive Administrative Strategy Chama Crossing at Red Rock, New Mexico U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service - National Trails Intermountain Region Bureau of Land Management - Utah This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents Old Spanish National Historic Trail - Final Comprehensive Administrative Stratagy Table of Contents i Table of Contents v Executive Summary 1 Chapter 1 - Introduction 3 The National Trails System 4 Old Spanish National Historic Trail Feasibility Study 4 Legislative History of the Old Spanish National Historic Trail 5 Nature and Purpose of the Old Spanish National Historic Trail 5 Trail Period of Significance 5 Trail Significance Statement 7 Brief Description of the Trail Routes 9 Goal of the Comprehensive Administrative Strategy 10 Next Steps and Strategy Implementation 11 Chapter 2 - Approaches to Administration 13 Introduction 14 Administration and Management 17 Partners and Trail Resource Stewards 17 Resource Identification, Protection, and Monitoring 19 National Historic Trail Rights-of-Way 44 Mapping and Resource Inventory 44 Partnership Certification Program 45 Trail Use Experience 47 Interpretation/Education 47 Primary Interpretive Themes 48 Secondary Interpretive Themes 48 Recreational Opportunities 49 Local Tour Routes 49 Health and Safety 49 User Capacity 50 Costs 50 Operations i Table of Contents Old Spanish National Historic Trail - Final Comprehensive Administrative Stratagy Table of Contents 51 Funding 51 Gaps in Information and
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Inventory
    Cultural Resources Inventory Santa Ana River Trail Project Phase IV Reaches B & C Redlands San Bernardino County, California Prepared For: San Bernardino County Department of Public Works 825 E. 3rd Street San Bernardino, California 92415 Prepared By: Wendy Blumel, RPA ECORP Consulting, Inc. 215 North 5th Street Redlands, California 92374 Under the direction of Principal Investigator: Roger Mason, Ph.D., RPA September 2018 ECORP Consulting, Inc. has assisted public and private land owners with environmental regulation compliance since 1987. We offer full service capability, from initial baseline environmental studies through environmental planning review, permitting negotiation, liaison to obtain legal agreements, mitigation design, and construction monitoring and reporting. Citation: ECORP Consulting, Inc. 2018. Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the Santa Ana River Trail Project Phase IV, Reaches B and C, Redlands, San Bernardino County. Prepared for the San Bernardino County Department of Public Works, San Bernardino, California. Inventory Report for the Santa Ana River Trail Project Phase IV, Reaches B and C, Redlands MANAGEMENT SUMMARY The County of San Bernardino Regional Parks Department (County) proposes to construct an approximately 3.3-mile-long section of the Santa Ana River Trail (SART) near the southern bank of the Santa Ana River. An archaeological survey was conducted of the Project Area, as determined from project plans, which includes the existing street rights-of-way and portions of undeveloped (vacant) parcels of land in the City of Redlands and in an unincorporated area in San Bernardino County. The cultural study included a cultural resources records search, Sacred Lands File search, field survey, and California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) evaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment for the City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department’S Palm #3 Reservoir Project
    INITIAL STUDY / ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT’S PALM #3 RESERVOIR PROJECT Project Proponent and CEQA Lead Agency: City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department 300 North “D” Street San Bernardino, California 92418 NEPA Lead Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, California 94105 Preparer: Tom Dodson & Associates 2150 North Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, California 92405 December 2008 INITIAL STUDY / ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT’S PALM #3 RESERVOIR PROJECT Project Proponent and CEQA Lead Agency: City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department 300 North “D” Street San Bernardino, California 92418 NEPA Lead Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, California 94105 Preparer: Tom Dodson & Associates 2150 North Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, California 92405 December 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 – PURPOSE AND NEED ........................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................. 1 1.2 Regulatory Requirements of NEPA ............................... 1 1.3 Purposes of this Environmental Review ........................... 1 1.4 Project Purpose and Need ...................................... 2 Chapter 2 – PROPOSED ACTION, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVES ................ 3 2.1 Proposed Action .............................................. 3 2.1.1 Location............................................
    [Show full text]
  • California Art Club Newsletter Lub Newsletter
    CALIFORNIA ART CLUB NEWSLETTER Documenting California’s Traditional Arts Heritage Since 1909 How the San Gabriel Valley Inspired California Impressionism and Lured Artists from across the Nation Part i of iii by Elaine Adams he development of an outstanding artist requires a process Tthat can be compared to that of nurturing a delicate seedling to full maturity and potential. Cultivation, environment, and faithful caring all have an influence on the final result. Throughout history burgeoning artists have instinctively, and certainly out of financial consideration, opted to live in close communities with fellow artists. In such settings, artists create their own subcultures as they spend their days among like-minded friends who speak their language—a form of communication that is based on their specific brand of artistic discipline and philosophy. Fellowship among artists becomes an essential source of sustaining encouragement in this lifestyle which can be sporadic in work and income. At times, an artist may travail obliviously over many days and weeks with only John Bond Francisco (1863–1931) occasional breaks for quick meals and Out of the Dust, c. 1918 minimal sleep. Then, there are dry Oil on canvas 340 3 460 periods when the flow of inspiration Private collection struggles. When such occurs, artists often resort to congregating with other climate, there are distinct characteristics Impressionist painter, although the early artists to talk art for extended hours. in the artwork created in the north, practitioners did not refer to themselves This activity becomes part of an artist’s as compared to those created in the as such, is to create spontaneous nurturing process.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Environmental Analysis
    5. Environmental Analysis 5. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 5.1 AESTHETICS Characterizing aesthetics and aesthetic impacts is highly subjective by nature. Aesthetics, as evaluated in this Section of the EIR, involves establishing the existing visual character including visual resources and scenic vistas unique to the City of San Bernardino, the SOI and the Arrowhead Springs area. Visual resources are determined by identifying existing landforms, natural features or urban characteristics; views of sensitive receptors (i.e., residential, schools, recreation areas, etc.); and existing light and glare (i.e., nighttime illumination). The aesthetic impacts of the proposed project are evaluated by determining the aesthetic compatibility of the proposed project with the surrounding area taking into consideration the visual qualities as well as the sensitivity of receptors to these features. 5.1.1 Environmental Setting 5.1.1.1 San Bernardino General Plan Update Visual Character The City of San Bernardino lies on a broad, gently sloping lowland that flanks the southwest margin of the San Bernardino Mountains. The lowland is underlain by alluvial sediments eroded from bedrock in the adjacent mountains and washed by rivers and creeks into the valley region where they have accumulated in layers of gravel, sand, silt and clay. This low lying valley is framed by the San Bernardino Mountains on the northeast and east, Blue Mountains and Box Springs Mountain abutting the Cities of Loma Linda and Redlands to the south, and the San Gabriel Mountains and the Jurupa Hills to the northwest and southwest, respectively. The Santa Ana River has a number of tributaries in the vicinity of San Bernardino that contribute flow to the main stem of the river including Lytle Creek, Cajon Creek, Warm Creek, East Creek and West Twin Creek (see Figure 3.1-2).
    [Show full text]
  • System-Wide Transit Corridor Plan for the San Bernardino Valley
    System-Wide Transit Corridor Plan for the San Bernardino Valley sbX E Street Corridor BRT Project Prepared for: Omnitrans Prepared by: Parsons Patti Post & Associates October 2010 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 5 1.1 SAFETEA-LU ............................................................................................................ 6 1.2 2004 System-Wide Plan ............................................................................................ 7 1.3 Development of the E Street Corridor ....................................................................... 7 1.4 California SB 375 .................................................................................................... 17 1.5 San Bernardino County Long Range Transit Plan ................................................... 18 1.6 Regionally Approved Travel Demand Model ........................................................... 21 1.7 Roles and Responsibilities ...................................................................................... 21 1.8 Opportunities to Shape Development/Redevelopment ............................................ 21 1.8.1 Economic Development ............................................................................. 21 1.8.2 Transit-Oriented Developments ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ARRIVE CORRIDOR FINAL REPORT TOC:1 Table of Contents
    A DVANCED R EGIONAL R AIL I NTEG R ATED V I S ION E A S T THE A rr IVE CO rr IDO R FINAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 Prepared by: Gruen Associates HR&A Advisors, Inc. HDR Funding: The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grant funds from the United States Department of Transportation and the State of California Department of Conservation. In addition, the work upon which this publication is based was funded in part through a grant awarded by the Strategic Growth Council under Grant Number 3010-541, and the San Bernardino Associated Governments. The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The statements and conclusions of this report are those of the Consultant and not necessarily those of the Strate- gic Growth Council or of the State of California Department of Conservation, or its employees. In addition, the contents do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of SCAG or the San Bernardino Association of Governments (SANBAG). This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. The Strategic Growth Council, the California Department of Conservation, SANBAG and SCAG make no warranties, express or implied, and assume no liability for the information contained in the succeeding text. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................... 1:1 1.1 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND................................................................................................. 1:2 1.1.1 Metrolink Commuter Rail – San Bernardino Metrolink Line.............................................. 1:2 1.1.2 Transit/Land Use Integration and Benefits......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Support Material Agenda Item No
    Support Material Agenda Item No. 17 Board of Directors Meeting November 4, 2020 10:00 AM MEETING ACCESSIBLE VIA ZOOM AT: https://gosbcta.zoom.us/j/99354182777 Teleconference Dial: 1-669-900-6833 Meeting ID: 993 5418 2777 CONSENT CALENDAR Transit 17. Task 3: Innovative Transit Review of the Metro-Valley Receive and file Task 3: Innovative Transit Review of the Metro-Valley Report. Task 3: Innovative Transit Review Report is being provided as a separate attachment. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY CONSOLIDATION STUDY AND INNOVATIVE TRANSIT REVIEW TASK 3—INNOVATIVE TRANSIT ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS OCTOBER 1, 2020 This page intentionally left blank. CONSOLIDATION STUDY AND INNOVATIVE TRANSIT REVIEW TASK 3—INNOVATIVE TRANSIT ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SUBMITTAL (VERSION 2.0) PROJECT NO.: 12771C70, TASK NO. 3 202012771C70, TASK NO. 3 2020 DATE: OCTOBER 1, 2020 WSP SUITE 350 862 E. HOSPITALITY LANE SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 TEL.: +1 909 888-1106 FAX: +1 909 889-1884 WSP.COM This page intentionally left blank. October 1, 2020 Beatriz Valdez, Director of Special Projects and Strategic Initiatives San Bernardino County Transportation Authority 1170 W. Third Street, 1st Floor San Bernardino, CA 92410 Dear Ms.Valdez: Client ref.: Contract No. C14086, CTO No. 70 Contract No. C14086, CTO No. 70 WSP is pleased to submit this Draft Task 3 Innovative Service Analysis and Concepts Report as part of the Consolidation Study and Innovative Transit Review. Upon receipt of comments from SBCTA and your partners, we will prepare and submit a final version of this report. Yours sincerely, Cliff Henke AVP/Project Leader, Global ZEB/BRT Coordinator XX/xx Encl.
    [Show full text]
  • BUS BOOK MECH B 11/29/10 3:09 PM Page 1
    BUS BOOK MECH B 11/29/10 3:09 PM Page 1 C M Y CM MY CY CMY K BUSRoutes and Schedules Effective January 3,BOOK 2011 to May 2, 2011 RESOLVE TO RIDE. 1-800-9-OMNIBUS OMNITRANS.ORG Welcome Aboard! Table of Contents Pass Outlets 2-3 Expendios de pases Passes by Mail 96 Pases por correo Fare Information 4-6 Información del precio Calendar 3 Calendario How to Ride 7-10 Cómo Viajar Transfer Centers 11-13 Centros de transbordo Destinations 14 Destinos Telephone Numbers 15 Números de teléfono Bike & Ride 16 Pedalear y viajar Wheelchair Lift 17 Elevador para sillas de ruedas Route Maps & Schedules 18-91 Mapas y horarios de rutas Access, Omnilink 92 - 95 Access, Omnilink WHAT’S NEW NOVEDADES What’s new for January? Only minor changes to a few of ¿Qué hay de nuevo para enero? Solo cambios menores a our routes. Maps for Routes 3-4 and 82 will reflect minor algunos de nuestros recorridos. Los mapas de los changes in routing and service enhancements. recorridos 3-4 y 82 reflejarán cambios menores en los recorridos y mejoras del servicio. Routes 3-4 Run time changes to all days. Routing El horario del recorrido de las rutas 3-4 ha cambiado around the 4th Street Transit Mall has been altered and para todos los días. El recorrido por 4th Street Transit the time point has been moved to Court and E Streets. Mall ha sido modificado y el cartel con los horarios ha sido llevado a las calles Court y E Street.
    [Show full text]