DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment for the City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department’S Palm #3 Reservoir Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment for the City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department’S Palm #3 Reservoir Project INITIAL STUDY / ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT’S PALM #3 RESERVOIR PROJECT Project Proponent and CEQA Lead Agency: City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department 300 North “D” Street San Bernardino, California 92418 NEPA Lead Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, California 94105 Preparer: Tom Dodson & Associates 2150 North Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, California 92405 December 2008 INITIAL STUDY / ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT’S PALM #3 RESERVOIR PROJECT Project Proponent and CEQA Lead Agency: City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department 300 North “D” Street San Bernardino, California 92418 NEPA Lead Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, California 94105 Preparer: Tom Dodson & Associates 2150 North Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, California 92405 December 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 – PURPOSE AND NEED ........................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................. 1 1.2 Regulatory Requirements of NEPA ............................... 1 1.3 Purposes of this Environmental Review ........................... 1 1.4 Project Purpose and Need ...................................... 2 Chapter 2 – PROPOSED ACTION, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVES ................ 3 2.1 Proposed Action .............................................. 3 2.1.1 Location............................................. 3 2.1.2 Environmental Setting .................................. 3 2.1.3 Project Characteristics ................................. 4 2.2 Alternatives ................................................. 4 2.2.1 No Action Alternative................................... 4 2.2.2 Alternative Sites ...................................... 4 Chapter 3 – AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ................................... 6 3.1 Air Quality .................................................. 6 3.1.1 Environmental Setting .................................. 6 3.1.2 Air Quality Regulations ................................. 10 3.2 Hydrology and Water Quality .................................... 15 3.2.1 Surface Water ........................................ 15 3.2.2 Groundwater ......................................... 16 3.2.3 Water Quality ........................................ 16 3.3 Utilities / Service Systems ...................................... 17 3.3.1 Domestic Water Supply ................................. 17 3.3.2 Sewage Treatment .................................... 17 3.3.3 Solid Waste Disposal .................................. 17 3.3.4 Natural Gas .......................................... 17 3.3.5 Electric Power ........................................ 17 3.4 Land Use / Planning ........................................... 18 3.5 Transportation / Traffic......................................... 18 3.6 Natural Resources ............................................ 18 3.6.1 Biological Resources................................... 18 3.6.2 Geology and Soils ..................................... 19 3.6.3 Mineral Resources .................................... 20 3.6.4 Visual Resources / Aesthetics............................ 20 3.7 Population and Housing ........................................ 21 3.8 Construction................................................. 21 3.9 Energy Issues ............................................... 21 -iii­ 3.10 Coastal Zone Management Act .................................. 21 3.11 Cultural Resources ........................................... 22 3.11.1 Prehistoric Context .................................... 22 3.11.2 Historic Context....................................... 22 3.12 Wild and Scenic Rivers ........................................ 23 3.13 Endangered Species .......................................... 23 3.14 Floodplain Management and Protection of Wetlands ................. 27 3.15 Farmland Protection ........................................... 27 3.16 Coastal Barrier Resources...................................... 28 3.17 Other Environmental Issues..................................... 28 3.17.1 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ........................ 28 3.17.2 Noise ............................................... 28 3.17.3 Public Services ....................................... 29 3.17.4 Recreation........................................... 30 3.17.5 Airport Hazards ....................................... 30 3.17.6 Environmental Justice .................................. 30 3.17.7 Unique Natural Features and Areas ....................... 30 3.17.8 Sole Source Aquifer ................................... 30 3.17.9 Site Access and Compatibility ............................ 31 3.18 Invasive Species ............................................. 31 Chapter 4 – ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ........................... 32 4.1 Air Quality .................................................. 32 4.2 Hydrology and Water Quality .................................... 38 4.3 Utilities / Service Systems ...................................... 41 4.4 Land Use / Planning ........................................... 42 4.5 Transportation / Traffic......................................... 43 4.6 Natural Resources ............................................ 45 4.6.1 Biological Resources................................... 45 4.6.2 Geology and Soils ..................................... 47 4.6.3 Mineral Resources .................................... 48 4.6.4 Visual Resources / Aesthetics............................ 49 4.7 Population and Housing ........................................ 50 4.8 Construction Aspects.......................................... 51 4.9 Energy Issues ............................................... 50 4.10 Coastal Zone Management Act .................................. 50 4.11 Cultural Resources ........................................... 51 4.12 Wild and Scenic Rivers ........................................ 55 4.13 Endangered Species .......................................... 56 4.14 Floodplain Management and Protection of Wetlands ................. 56 4.15 Farmland Protection ........................................... 56 4.16 Coastal Barrier Resources...................................... 56 4.17 Other Environmental Issues..................................... 57 4.17.1 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ........................ 57 4.17.2 Noise ............................................... 58 4.17.3 Public Services ....................................... 61 -iv­ 4.17.4 Recreation........................................... 62 4.17.5 Airport Hazards ....................................... 62 4.17.6 Environmental Justice .................................. 62 4.17.7 Unique Natural Features and Areas ....................... 62 4.17.8 Sole Source Aquifer ................................... 62 4.17.9 Site Access and Compatibility ............................ 63 4.17.10 Irreversible/Irretrievable Commitments of Resources .......... 63 4.18 Invasive Species ............................................. 63 Chapter 5 – CEQA CHECKLIST FORM ..................................... 64 Chapter 6 – ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS ................................... 83 6.1 No Action Alternative .......................................... 83 6.2 Alternative Sites.............................................. 83 Chapter 7 – CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ...................................... 85 Chapter 8 – SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES ......................... 86 Chapter 9 – PREPARERS ................................................ 89 Chapter 10 – REFERENCES ............................................. 90 -v­ LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1-1 State of California Air Resources Board Ambient AQ Standards ...... 7 Table 3.1-2 Health Effects Summary for Air Pollutants ....................... 9 Table 3.1-3 Air Quality Data for Monitoring Stations ......................... 10 Table 3.13-1 CNDDB Records Search .................................... 24 Table 4.1-1 Project Schedule .......................................... 33 Table 4.1-2 Overall Maximum Unmitigated Daily Construction Emissions ........ 34 Table 4.1-3 Summary of Carbon Dioxide Emissions ......................... 34 Table 4.1-4 General Conformity Emission Levels ........................... 37 Table 4.1-5 Project Emissions ......................................... 37 LIST OF FIGURES (at end of document) Figure 1 Regional Map Figure 2 Site Location Figure 3 Site Photographs Figure 4 Site Photographs Figure 5 Palm Site Improvement Plan APPENDICES Appendix A – Historical / Archaeological Resources Report Appendix B – Informal Section 7 Consultation and Site Review Appendix C – Air Quality Analysis -vi­ Chapter 1 PURPOSE AND NEED 1.1 INTRODUCTION The project generally consists of constructing a 4 million gallon (MG) water storage reservoir on the existing City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department’s (CSBMWD) 4.29-acre Palm Reservoir site. The site contains an existing 5 MG and a 325,000 gallon above groundwater storage reservoirs, a water pumping station, hydro-generation station which produces electricity from the energy in water delivered to the site from higher elevations, and various other water supply equipment (pipes, valves, etc.). The Palm Reservoir water system provides water to the CSBMWD’s College-Palm pressure zone. Presently, the College-Palm pressure zone has about a 3.2 MG deficiency in emergency and fire flow water storage capacity to comply
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cultural Resources Assessment
    CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT 10843 NEW JERSEY STREET INDUSTRIAL PROJECT CITY OF REDLANDS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA May 2020 CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT 10843 NEW JERSEY STREET INDUSTRIAL PROJECT CITY OF REDLANDS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Mr. Larry D. Cochrun 555 North El Camino Real, Suite A456 San Clemente, California 92672 Prepared by: Casey Tibbet, M.A. and Riordan Goodwin LSA Associates, Inc. 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200 Riverside, California 92507 (951) 781-9310 LSA Project No. CWW1902 National Archaeological Data Base Information: Type of Study: Records Search, Survey, Architectural Evaluation USGS Quadrangle: Redlands, California Acreage: 4.17 May 2020 C ULTURAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT 10843 N EW J ERSEY S TREET I NDUSTRIAL P ROJECT M A Y 2020 R EDLANDS, C ALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT SUMMARY LSA conducted a cultural resources assessment for the 10843 New Jersey Street Industrial Project located in the City of Redlands (City), San Bernardino County, California. The assessment included a records search, archival research, field surveys, and this report. The subject property is approximately four acres and is currently developed with a 1922 residence and related structures, as well as more than 700 citrus trees. The proposed project involves the removal of the citrus grove and related buildings to facilitate construction of an approximately 179,000-square foot concrete tilt-up warehouse building and related parking on two parcels to be merged into one. The City as Lead Agency for the project required this study as part of the environmental review process to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The purpose of the study is to provide the City with the necessary information and analysis to determine, as mandated by CEQA, whether the proposed project would cause substantial adverse changes to any historical/archaeological resources that may exist in or around the project area.
    [Show full text]
  • Application Materials: LAFCO Application and Sphere Supplement Forms
    Application Materials: LAFCO Application and Sphere Supplement Forms, LAFCO Resolution 3248, and Excerpts from Countywide Service Review for Water Attachment 2 __________________________3222 (FOR LAFCO USE ONLY) SAN BERNARDINO LAFCO APPLICATION AND PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTION FORM INTRODUCTION: The questions on this form and its supplements are designed to obtain enough data about the application to allow the San Bernardino LAFCO, its staff and others to adequately assess the proposal. By taking the time to fully respond to the questions on the forms, you can reduce the processing time for your proposal. You may also include any additional information which you believe is pertinent. Use additional sheets where necessary, or attach any relevant documents. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. NAME OF PROPOSAL: __________________________________________________________LAFCO 3222 - Sphere of Influence Establishment for ______________________________________________________________________________the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California ______________________________________________________________________________(within San Bernardino County) 2. NAME OF APPLICANT: __________________________________________________________Local Agency Formation Commission for San Bernardino County APPLICANT TYPE: Landowner Local Agency Registered Voter Other________________________________ MAILING ADDRESS: ______________________________________________________________________________1170 W. Third Street, Unit 150, San Bernardino, CA 92415-0490 ______________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Old Spanish National Historic Trail Final Comprehensive Administrative Strategy
    Old Spanish National Historic Trail Final Comprehensive Administrative Strategy Chama Crossing at Red Rock, New Mexico U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service - National Trails Intermountain Region Bureau of Land Management - Utah This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents Old Spanish National Historic Trail - Final Comprehensive Administrative Stratagy Table of Contents i Table of Contents v Executive Summary 1 Chapter 1 - Introduction 3 The National Trails System 4 Old Spanish National Historic Trail Feasibility Study 4 Legislative History of the Old Spanish National Historic Trail 5 Nature and Purpose of the Old Spanish National Historic Trail 5 Trail Period of Significance 5 Trail Significance Statement 7 Brief Description of the Trail Routes 9 Goal of the Comprehensive Administrative Strategy 10 Next Steps and Strategy Implementation 11 Chapter 2 - Approaches to Administration 13 Introduction 14 Administration and Management 17 Partners and Trail Resource Stewards 17 Resource Identification, Protection, and Monitoring 19 National Historic Trail Rights-of-Way 44 Mapping and Resource Inventory 44 Partnership Certification Program 45 Trail Use Experience 47 Interpretation/Education 47 Primary Interpretive Themes 48 Secondary Interpretive Themes 48 Recreational Opportunities 49 Local Tour Routes 49 Health and Safety 49 User Capacity 50 Costs 50 Operations i Table of Contents Old Spanish National Historic Trail - Final Comprehensive Administrative Stratagy Table of Contents 51 Funding 51 Gaps in Information and
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Inventory
    Cultural Resources Inventory Santa Ana River Trail Project Phase IV Reaches B & C Redlands San Bernardino County, California Prepared For: San Bernardino County Department of Public Works 825 E. 3rd Street San Bernardino, California 92415 Prepared By: Wendy Blumel, RPA ECORP Consulting, Inc. 215 North 5th Street Redlands, California 92374 Under the direction of Principal Investigator: Roger Mason, Ph.D., RPA September 2018 ECORP Consulting, Inc. has assisted public and private land owners with environmental regulation compliance since 1987. We offer full service capability, from initial baseline environmental studies through environmental planning review, permitting negotiation, liaison to obtain legal agreements, mitigation design, and construction monitoring and reporting. Citation: ECORP Consulting, Inc. 2018. Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the Santa Ana River Trail Project Phase IV, Reaches B and C, Redlands, San Bernardino County. Prepared for the San Bernardino County Department of Public Works, San Bernardino, California. Inventory Report for the Santa Ana River Trail Project Phase IV, Reaches B and C, Redlands MANAGEMENT SUMMARY The County of San Bernardino Regional Parks Department (County) proposes to construct an approximately 3.3-mile-long section of the Santa Ana River Trail (SART) near the southern bank of the Santa Ana River. An archaeological survey was conducted of the Project Area, as determined from project plans, which includes the existing street rights-of-way and portions of undeveloped (vacant) parcels of land in the City of Redlands and in an unincorporated area in San Bernardino County. The cultural study included a cultural resources records search, Sacred Lands File search, field survey, and California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) evaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • History of San Bernardino, California, Wikipedia
    History of San Bernardino, California - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_San_Bernardino,_California History of San Bernardino, California From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia San Bernardino, California, was named in 1810. This article relates to the present-day city of San Bernardino and its surrounding areas. Contents 1 Earliest inhabitants 2 Spanish California 3 Mission California 4 Rancho period 5 Mormon San Bernardino 6 Recall 7 1860s and 1870s 8 Rail wars, rise to local prominence 9 The dawn of the 20th Century 10 World War II and its aftermath 11 Redevelopment and decline 12 Recent history 13 Historical San Bernardino today 14 See also 15 References Earliest inhabitants San Bernardino's earliest known inhabitants were Serrano Indians (Spanish for "people of the mountains") who spent their winters in the valley, and their summers in the cooler mountains. They were known as the "Yuhaviatam" or People of the Pines. They have lived in the valley since approximately 1000 B.C. They lived in small brush covered structures. At the time the Spanish first visited the valley, approximately 1500 Serranos inhabited the area. They lived in villages of ten to thirty structures that the Spanish named rancherías. The Tongva Indians also called the San Bernardino area Wa'aach in their language.[1] Spanish California Spanish Military Commander of California Pedro Fages probably entered San Bernardino valley in 1772. Missionary priest Father Francisco Garces entered the valley in 1774, as did the de Anza Expedition, though not in present-day San Bernardino. The traditional (since there is a dispute as to the following events) founding and naming of San Bernardino is that Padre Francisco Dumetz, a Franciscan priest, made a trip from the Mission San Gabriel Arcángel to the San Bernardino Valley on May 20, 1810, the feast day of Saint Bernardino of Siena (San Bernardino in Spanish) during California's Mission Period.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Study and Evaluation for the Proposed Redlands Greenwood High School No
    CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18952 UNINCORPORATED AREA OF REDLANDS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA July 2014 CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18952 UNINCORPORATED AREA OF REDLANDS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: 800 Opal, LLC Prepared by: Gini Austerman, M.A., RPA LSA Associates, Inc. 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200 Riverside, California 92507 LSA Project No. WAL1401 National Archaeological Database Information: Type of Study: Intensive Survey Sites Recorded: None USGS Quadrangles: Redlands, California 7.5' Acreage: 38.34 acres Key Words: Phase I Survey, Negative Results July 2014 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT JULY 2014 WALDEN STRUCTURES RESIDENTIAL PROJECT CITY OF REDLANDS, CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT SUMMARY LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) is under contract to Walden Structures to conduct a cultural resources assessment for Tentative Tract Map 18952 in an unincorporated area of Redlands, San Bernardino County, California. The 38.34-acre undeveloped property is proposed to be developed with 131 single-family residences. As part of the development process and in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), City staff is requiring a Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment. As such, a cultural resources records search, literature review, and intensive survey were conducted for the project. Water conveyance features (concrete standpipe irrigation system) were identified within the project boundaries during the survey, but they do not constitute a cultural landscape or warrant recordation or evaluation as cultural resources. No prehistoric cultural resources have been documented within 0.5 mile of the project area; it has been so severely disturbed by previous agricultural use that sensitivity is low for subsurface archaeological resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural and Historical Significance Assessments of 212 and 216 Brookside Avenue, City of Redlands, San Bernardino County
    ARCHITECTURAL AND HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENTS OF 212 AND 216 BROOKSIDE AVENUE, CITY OF REDLANDS, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Submitted to: Vantage One Real Estate Investments, LLC 4 Corporate Plaza Drive #210 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Attn: Mr. Tom Robinson Prepared by: Archaeological Associates P.O. Box 180 Sun City, CA 92586 Tel: (951) 244-1783 Fax: (951) 244-0084 [email protected] APNs (212 Brookside) 0171-101-01, -02, -03, -04, -05, 0171-211-15, -17, & -25 APNs (216 Brookside) 0171-211-13, -14, -16, -18, -19, -20 & -21 2nd Revision April, 2018 CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this report, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. …………………………. Robert S. White Principal Investigator P.O. Box 180 Sun City, CA 92586 Tel: (951) 244-1783 Fax: (951) 244-0084 email: [email protected] NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA BASE INFORMATION Author(s): Robert S. White Consulting Firm: Archaeological Associates P.O. Box 180 Sun City, CA 92586 Tel (951) 244-1783 Fax (951) 244-0084 Report Date: Revised: April, 2018 Report Title: Architectural and Historical Significance Assessments of 212 and 216 Brookside Avenue, City of Redlands, San Bernardino County Prepared for: Vantage One Real Estate Investments, LLC 4 Corporate Plaza Drive #210 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Contact: Mr. Tom Robinson USGS Quadrangle: Redlands 7.5', California (1996) Study Area: Unsectioned portion of Township 1 South, Range 3 West, SBBM APNs: 212 Brookside: 0171-101-01, -02, -03, -04, -05, 0171-211-15, -17, & -25 216 Brookside: 0171-211-13, -14, -16, -18, -19, -20 & -21 Keywords: Evaluation, 212 and 216 Brookside Avenue, City of Redlands, San Bernardino County i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Management Summary.......iv I.
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Constructions of Tribal Sovereignty in Southern California AD
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Unsettling Knowledge: Emerging Constructions of Tribal Sovereignty in Southern California A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by Theodor Putnam Strollo Gordon March 2013 Dissertation Committee: Dr. David Kronenfeld, Chairperson Dr. Yoland Moses Dr. Clifford Trafzer Copyright by Theodor Putnam Strollo Gordon 2013 2 The Dissertation of Theodor Putnam Strollo Gordon is approved: ________________________________________ ________________________________________ ________________________________________ Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements I am grateful for many individuals and organizations, without which this dissertation would not have been possible. For their expertise, guidance and help, I would like to thank Kate Spilde, David Schwartz, Hannah Nyala West, Caitlyn Marrs, Martin Johnson, Michael Kearney, Anthony Madrigal, Juliet McMullin, Sally Ness, Nicoletta Maestri, John Alvarado, Tom Patterson, Wendy Ashmore, John Gust, Sarah Grant, Elizabeth Wessells, Max and Marvin Strollo Gordon, Majia Glasier-Lawson, Lisa Garibaldi, Gary Garrett, Melanie Spoo, Judy Kronenfeld, Gene Anderson, Justin Doran, Kelly Miester and Dan Leonard, as well as my parents, for their encouragement and love. The following institutions provided invaluable support: The Malki Museum, The Agua Caliente Cultural Museum, The UNLV University Libraries’ Special Collections, The Twenty- Nine Palms Historical Society, Joshua Tree National Park, The Joshua Tree National Park Association, The Center for Gaming Research at UNLV, The California Digital Newspaper Collection, The National Archives and Records Administration, The Sycuan Institute on Tribal Gaming, The Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, The Graduate Division at UCR. Finally, I am indebted to my committee members, David Kronenfeld, Yolanda Moses, and Cliff Trafzer, for sharing their advice and knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • 295 W. County Line Road and 907 S. California Street
    HISTORIC-PERIOD BUILDING EVALUATION REPORT 295 W. COUNTY LINE ROAD AND 907 S. CALIFORNIA STREET Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 410-040-001 and 410-111-001 City of Calimesa, Riverside County, California For Submittal to: City of Calimesa Community Development Department, Planning Division 908 Park Avenue Calimesa, CA 92320 Prepared for: Albert A. Webb Associates 3788 McCray Street Riverside, CA 92506 Prepared by: CRM TECH 1016 E. Cooley Drive, Suite A/B Colton, CA 92324 Bai “Tom” Tang, Principal Investigator Michael Hogan, Principal Investigator September 19, 2019 CRM TECH Contract No. 3530 Title: Historic-Period Building Evaluation Report: 295 W. County Line Road and 907 S. California Street, Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 410-040-001 and 410-111- 001, City of Calimesa, Riverside County, California Author(s): Bai “Tom” Tang, Principal Investigator Terri Jacquemain, Historian/Architectural Historian Consulting Firm: CRM TECH 1016 East Cooley Drive, Suite A/B Colton, CA 92324 (909) 824-6400 Date: September 19, 2019 For Submittal to: City of Calimesa Community Development Department, Planning Division 908 Park Avenue Calimesa, CA 92320 (909) 795-9801 Prepared for: Cynthia L. Gibbs, PMP Albert A. Webb Associates 3788 McCray Street Riverside, CA 92506 (951) 320-6057 USGS Quadrangle: Yucaipa, Calif., 7.5’ quadrangle (Section 13, T2S R2W, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian) Keywords: Yucaipa Valley area; single-family residences, circa 1946 and 1958; not “historical resources” under CEQA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Between July and September 2019, at the request of Webb Associates, CRM TECH performed a cultural resources study on two single-family residences at 295 West County Line Road and 907 South California Street in the City of Calimesa, Riverside County, California.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Assessment
    CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT 10797 NEW JERSEY STREET INDUSTRIAL PROJECT CITY OF REDLANDS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA May 2020 CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT 10797 NEW JERSEY STREET INDUSTRIAL PROJECT CITY OF REDLANDS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Larry Cochrun LDC Industrial Realty 555 N. El Camino Real, Suite A456 San Clemente, California 92672 Prepared by: Riordan Goodwin LSA Associates, Inc. 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200 Riverside, California 92507 (951) 781-9310 LSA Project No. CWW1901 National Archaeological Data Base Information: Type of Study: Records Search, Survey, Archaeological Assessment USGS Quadrangle: Redlands, California Acreage: 4.77 May 2020 C ULTURAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT 10797 N EW J ERSEY S TREET I NDUSTRIAL P ROJECT M A Y 2020 R EDLANDS, C A LIFORNIA MANAGEMENT SUMMARY LSA was retained by LDC Industrial Realty to conduct a cultural resources assessment for the proposed 10797 New Jersey Street Industrial Project in the City of Redlands, San Bernardino County, California. The City required this study as part of the environmental review process to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A cultural resources records search, additional research, and a field survey were conducted for the project area. A historic period residence was formerly located within the project area, and the project parcels were under cultivation for several decades during the historic period. In addition, six resources related to Native American cultural heritage are recorded within a mile. Considering these factors, along with the limited data from the records search (only approximately 20 percent of the area within one mile has been surveyed for cultural resources), the project parcels have some potential for subsurface resources.
    [Show full text]
  • SAN BERNARDINO AREA OFFICE REPLACEMENT PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
    CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL SAN BERNARDINO AREA OFFICE REPLACEMENT PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration February 2018 CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL San Bernardino Office Replacement Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared for: State of California Department of General Services 707 Third Street West Sacramento, CA 95605 On behalf of the Lead Agency: California Highway Patrol 601 N. 7th Street, Building C Sacramento, CA 95811 Prepared by: Horizon Water and Environment, LLC 266 Grand Avenue, Suite 210 Oakland, California 94610 Contact: Michael Stevenson (510) 986-1852 February 2018 Horizon Water and Environment. 2018. California Highway Patrol San Bernardino Area Office Replacement Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. February. (HWE 15.002) Oakland, CA. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 1-1 3 1.1 Intent and Scope of this Document ............................................. 1-1 4 1.2 Public Involvement Process ........................................................ 1-2 5 1.3 Organization of this Document .................................................... 1-2 6 1.4 Impact Terminology .................................................................... 1-3 7 Chapter 2 Project Description ..................................................................................... 2-1 8 2.1 Background and Need for the Project ......................................... 2-1 9 2.2 Project Purpose
    [Show full text]
  • Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment 1035/1045 Parkford Drive Project City of Redlands, San Bernardino County, California
    Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment 1035/1045 Parkford Drive Project City of Redlands, San Bernardino County, California Redlands, California, USGS 7.5-minute Topographic Quadrangle Map Range 35, Township 1 South, Range 3 West APN 0174-143-07 2.73-acre Study Area Prepared for: Harcourts & Freeman 1780 Orange Tree Lane Redlands, CA 92374 Contact: Brad Freeman Prepared by: FirstCarbon Solutions 7265 N. First Street, Suite 101 Fresno, CA 93720 714.508.4100 Contact: David Smith, Project Manager, Archaeologist Date: February 27, 2017 NORTH AMERICA | EUROPE | AFRICA | AUSTRALIA | ASIA WWW.FIRSTCARBONSOLUTIONS.COM THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Harcourts & Freeman—1035/1045 Parkford Drive Project Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Table of Contents Table of Contents Management Summary ................................................................................................................. 1 Section 1: Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 - Project Location ................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 - Project Description ............................................................................................................ 3 1.3 - Natural Setting ................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 - Assessment Team .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]