FIFTY YEARS of GERMAN BASIC LAW the NEW DEPARTURE for GERMANY Conference Report Conference Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FIFTY YEARS of GERMAN BASIC LAW the NEW DEPARTURE for GERMANY Conference Report Conference Report FIFTY YEARS OF GERMAN BASIC LAW THE NEW DEPARTURE FOR GERMANY Conference Report Conference Report American Institute for Contemporary German Studies The Johns Hopkins University Conference Report FIFTY YEARS OF GERMAN BASIC LAW THE NEW DEPARTURE FOR GERMANY American Institute for Contemporary German Studies The Johns Hopkins University The American Institute for Contemporary German Studies (AICGS) is a center for advanced research, study, and discussion on the politics, culture, and society of the Federal Republic of Germany. Established in 1983 and affiliated with The Johns Hopkins University but governed by its own Board of Trustees, AICGS is a privately incorporated institute dedicated to independent, critical, and comprehensive analysis and assessment of current German issues. Its goals are to help develop a new generation of American scholars with a thorough understanding of contemporary Germany, deepen American knowledge and understanding of current German developments, contribute to American policy analysis of problems relating to Germany, and promote interdisciplinary and comparative research on Germany. Executive Director: Jackson Janes Research Director: Carl Lankowski Development Director: Laura Rheintgen Board of Trustees, Cochair: Steven Muller Board of Trustees, Cochair: Harry J. Gray The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies. ©1999 by the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies ISBN 0-941441-46-6 This AICGS Conference Report paper is made possible through grants from the German Program for Transatlantic Relations. Additional copies are available at $5.00 each to cover postage and processing from the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, Suite 420, 1400 16th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20036-2217. Telephone 202/332-9312, Fax 202/265-9531, E-mail: [email protected], Web: http://www.aicgs.org. ii C O N T E N T S Foreword................................................................................................v About the Authors.................................................................................ix THE BASIC LAW: A FIFTY YEAR ASSESSMENT Donald P. Kommers....................................................................................1 THE ROLE OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT Jutta Limbach.............................................................................9 THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN DIGNITY (ARTICLE 1 OF THE BASIC LAW) Ernst Benda.............................................................................................35 FIFTY YEARS OF THE BASIC LAW – MIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP AND ASYLUM Kay Hailbronner......................................................................................47 STATE AND MARKET IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER Fritz Ossenbühl.......................................................................................71 Conference Agenda.......................................................................................89 iii F O R E W O R D The fiftieth anniversary of the founding of the Federal Republic of Germany in May of 1999 was the occasion for the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, in cooperation with the Dräger Foundation, to organize a conference that addressed the development of Germany’s Basic Law since 1949. The agenda of the conference included a number of issues, which were presented in a comparative context with developments influencing the interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. The role of the Federal Constitutional Court, balancing the equation between the state and the market place, controlling asylum and immigration policies, and responses to the increasingly comprehensive global economy were among the topics of discussion. In addition, the particular impact of German unification on the Basic Law was a focus of the conference. The contributions in this volume represent several of the perspectives presented on these issues. They provide assessments of the parameters of German approaches to the interpretation and application of the Basic Law to the continually changing environment in Germany during the past five decades. They also raise questions concerning the anticipated challenges Germany faces in its domestic environment and within the European Union as an increasingly important factor in the legal environment. We are pleased that the current and past presidents of Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court, Prof. Dr. Jutta Limbach and Prof. Dr. Ernst Benda have contributed their thoughts and analysis to this volume, along with three leading scholars: Professor Donald Kommers, University of Notre Dame, Prof. Dr. Kay Hailbronner, University of Konstanz, and Professor Fritz Ossenbühl, University of Bonn. It is particularly important for Germans and Americans to understand the common challenges we face in adjusting to the changes and challenges generated in our societies and within the global community. Germany’s Basic Law shares many of the values and principles laid down in the U.S. Constitution. How we interpret them may differ based on our different political and social history. Yet it is clear that the basis for two healthy v and innovative democracies is the German and American commitment to the preservation of the constitutional framework. These essays will be of value to those who wish to understand and pursue the development of Germany’s most successful experiment in democracy in its often turbulent history. The fiftieth anniversary of the Federal Republic also coincided with the tenth anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, which represented another milestone in German democracy. Taken together, these two memorable turning points give hope and encouragement to those seeking to build on the democratic principles, which help to rebuild the Federal Republic in 1949 and to accomplish a bloodless revolution forty years later. We are grateful for the cooperation of the Dräger Foundation in preparing this conference, to all the participants and to the German Program in Transatlantic Relations for its generous support. Jack Janes Executive Director November 1999 vi A B O U T T H E A U T H O R S Professor Dr. Ernst Benda is the past president of Federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe, of which he was a member from 1971- 1983. Since 1984 he has been a professor for Constitutional Law at the University of Freiburg. He is currently chairman of Media Council of Berlin-Brandenburg since 1992. Prof. Dr. Kay Hailbronner, LL.M. is director of the Center for International and European Law on Immigration and Asylum and Chairman ILA Committee on Refugee Procedures. From 1988 - 1992 he was Judge at the Administrative Appeal Court of Baden-Württemberg. In 1990 he served as legal counsel for the federal government in Asylum and Immigration Cases at the Constitutional Court and the European Court, Luxembourg. Professor Donald P. Kommers is the Joseph and Elizabeth Robbie Professor of Government and Law at the University of Notre Dame. He has spent several years of his academic career in Germany, most recently as a senior fellow at the Max Planck Institute of International and Comparative Public Law (Heidelberg). He has authored numerous books and articles on American and comparative constitutional law, including American Institutional Law: Essays, Cases, and Comparative Notes (1998, coauthored with John Finn). Professor Dr. Jutta Limbach is the first woman to be elected president of the German Constitutional Court. In 1971 she received a chair of law at the Free University of Berlin and worked there as professor for civil law, commercial law and legal sociology until 1989. In 1989 Ms. Limbach became Senator of Justice of the City and State of Berlin. In March 1994 she was elected justice and vice-president of the German Constitutional Court and then president in September 1994. Professor Dr. Fritz Ossenbühl he has been full member of the North Rhine Westphalian Academy of Sciences since 1998. Since 1984 has been member of the Selection Committee of the Alexander-von- vii Humboldt Foundation. From 1984-1996 he was member of the Permanent Delegation of the German Convention of Lawyers (Deutscher Juristentag). His main areas of specialization are constitutional and administrative law and state liability law. viii Donald P. Kommers THE BASIC LAW: A FIFTY YEAR ASSESSMENT Donald P. Kommers In 1949, fifty years ago, Germany embarked upon a fascinating constitutional experiment. In that year, with the consent of the three occupying powers, the United States, France and Great Britain, German leaders in the western zone of occupation drafted a new constitution that created the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG).1 They called it the Basic Law (Grundgesetz) to highlight its provisional character. The more dignified term “constitution” (Verfassung) would be reserved for the time when Germany as a whole would determine its own future. Accordingly, the Basic Law by its own terms was to cease to exist on the day a reunited Germany replaced it with a real constitution freely adopted by all the German people.2 The Basic Law raised as many questions as it tried to answer. Could a newly minted constitution—mere words on paper—breathe new life into a people devastated by war? Would it serve as a framework of government? Would it promote respect for human rights and popular government? Would it foster internal political unity? And if the FRG were to reach the half-century mark—as it would in 1999—how
Recommended publications
  • Strasbourg, 25 February 2004 CDL-JU(2004)031 Engl
    Strasbourg, 25 February 2004 CDL-JU(2004)031 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) in co-operation with THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION and with the assistance of THE INSTITUTE OF LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY Conference on the “ROLE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT IN THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STABILITY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION” Moscow, 27-28 February 2004 THE APPLICATION OF DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES OF INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTION AS A FACTOR OF DEVELOPMENT THEREOF Report by Mr Uno LÕHMUS (Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Estonia) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera pas distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. CDL-JU(2004)031 - 2 - Every political system needs to be modified over time. First, changes in the environment within which the political system operates may make present rules obsolete. This includes economic, technological and demographic changes. Second, changes in the values and attitudes of the population may generate a need to alter parts of the system. Political preferences are not constant over time. Third, we may want to modify the system because we learn about unintended, unexpected and unwanted consequences of the present institutions. There are three main types of change in the constitutional arrangement of a country. The first possibility is revision or replacement of the constitutional document by means of the formal amendment procedure specified in the constitution itself. The second possibility is revision of the constitutional framework by means of judicial interpretation. An example is the landmark Marbury vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Dr. Dres. H. C. Paul Kirchhof Bundesverfassungsrichter A. D
    Prof. Dr. Dres. h. c. Paul Kirchhof Bundesverfassungsrichter a. D. Schriftenverzeichnis Übersicht I. Herausgeberschaften A. Herausgeber von Sammelwerken B. Mitherausgeber von Zeitschriften und Zeitungen C. Herausgeber von Jubiläumsschriften D. Herausgeber sonstiger Schriften E. Herausgeber von Gesetzestexten II. Selbständige Veröffentlichungen III. Veröffentlichungen in Fachzeitschriften und Sammelwerken IV. Vorträge, Spezialbeiträge V. Beiträge in Zeitungen und Journalen (Auswahl) Autor: Paul Kirchhof VI. Wissenschaftliche Würdigungen VII. Personenbezogene Sachberichte und Interviews (Auswahl, fremde Autoren) VIII. Berichterstatterschaft zu Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts - 2 - I. Herausgeberschaften A. Herausgeber von Sammelwerken: 1. Handbuch des Staatsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (zusammen mit Josef Isensee) Band I, Historische Grundlagen, 1. Aufl., 1987; 2. Aufl., 1995; 3. Aufl., 2003 (In der 1. und 2. Auflage erschienen unter dem Titel „Grundlagen von Staat und Verfassung“) Band II, Verfassungsstaat, 1. Aufl., 1987; 2. Aufl., 1998; 3. Aufl., 2004 (In der 1. und 2. Auflage erschienen unter dem Titel „Demokratische Willensbil- dung – Staatsorgane des Bundes“) Band III, Demokratie Bundesorgane, 1. Aufl., 1988; 2. Aufl., 1996; 3. Aufl., 2005 (In der 1. und 2. Auflage erschienen unter dem Titel „Das Handeln des Staates“) Band IV, Aufgaben des Staates, 1. Aufl., 1990; 2. Aufl., 1999; 3. Aufl., 2006 (In der 1. und 2. Auflage erschienen unter dem Titel „Finanzverfassung - Bundes- staatliche Ordnung“) Band V, Rechtsquellen, Organisation, Finanzen, 1. Aufl., 1992; 2. Aufl., 2000; 3. Aufl. 2007 (In der 1. und 2. Auflage erschienen unter dem Titel „Allgemeine Grundrechtsleh- ren“) Band VI, Bundesstaat, 1. Aufl., 1989; 2. Aufl., 2001; 3. Aufl., 2008 (In der 1. und 2. Auflage erschienen unter dem Titel „Freiheitsrechte“) Band VII, Freiheitsrechte, 1. Aufl., 1992; 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Europe
    Central Europe West Germany FOREIGN POLICY AND STATUS OF BERLIN OUBJECTS discussed during British Premier Harold Wilson's offi- cial visit to Bonn from March 7 to 9 included the maintenance of the British Rhine Army in Germany, the continuation of German currency aid for the United Kingdom, and a new approach to German reunification. When East German authorities tried to interfere with the meeting of the Bundestag in Berlin on April 7 by disrupting traffic to and from the former capital, the Western Allies protested sharply. In his opening speech Eugen Gerstenmaier, president of the Bundestag, emphasized the right of the Fed- eral parliament to meet in West Berlin and denied that the session was an act of provocation. During the Easter holidays 300,000 West Berliners were permitted to visit relatives in the Eastern zone of the divided city. About a million Berliners crossed the Berlin Wall and spent Christmas with their relatives, after the renewal of an agreement in November. Queen Elizabeth II of England and her consort the Duke of Edinburgh made an official visit to West Germany and West Berlin in May, and were cheered by the population. Attempts by Foreign Minister Gerhard Schroder to bring about an improvement in relations with the United Kingdom during this visit were viewed skeptically by Franz-Josef Strauss, chairman of the Christian Social Union (CSU), representing the pro-French wing of the coalition. French President Charles de Gaulle's talks with Chancellor Ludwig Erhard in Bonn in June were described as "positive," but did not lead to an agree- ment on a conference to discuss the reorganization of the Common Market and other matters pertaining to the European community.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 Jahre Ministerkonferenz Für Raumordnung (MKRO)
    50 Jahre Ministerkonferenz für Raumordnung Festschrift anlässlich des 50-jährigen Bestehens der MKRO www.bmvi.de Diese Broschüre greift einzelne Themen heraus, die besonders anschaulich einen Überblick über den Wandel der Raumordnung von 1967 bis heute geben. Über den QR-Code am Ende eines Textes gelangen Sie zu weiterführenden Informationen zum jeweiligen Thema, mit umfangreichem Kartenmaterial, Texten aus den Raumord- nungsberichten und Beschlüssen der MKRO. Und so geht’s: QR-Code Scanner auf Ihrem Smartphone oder Tablet als App herunterladen, das Kameraauge zum Scannen auf das Symbol halten - Sie werden automatisch zu den weiterführenden Inhalten geleitet. Inhaltsverzeichnis Vorwort ...............................................................................................................................2 Mobilität .............................................................................................................................4 Umweltschutz ...................................................................................................................6 Urbanisierung ....................................................................................................................8 Raumordnung 1967-1977 ............................................................................................ 10 Raumordnung 1977-1987 ............................................................................................ 14 Raumordnung 1987-1997 ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Heidelberger Akademie Der Wissenschaften Jahrbuch 2018
    Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften Jahrbuch 2018 Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften Jahrbuch 2018 HEIDELBERG 2019 ISBN 978-3-00-062676-0 © 2019. Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Karlstraße 4, D-69117 Heidelberg Dieses Werk einschließlich aller seiner Teile ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung außerhalb der engen Grenzen des Urheberrechtsgesetzes ist ohne Zustimmung der Akademie unzulässig und strafbar. Das gilt insbesondere für Vervielfältigungen, Übersetzungen, Mikroverfilmungen und die Einspeicherung und Verarbeitung in elektronischen Systemen. Imprimé en Allemagne. Printed in Germany Redaktion: Uta Hüttig Fotos (soweit nicht anders angegeben): Dr. Herbert von Bose, Andreas Dafferner oder privat Layout und Satz: Strassner ComputerSatz, Heidelberg Druck: mediaprint solutions GmbH, Paderborn Inhaltsverzeichnis A. Das akademische Jahr 2018 I. Jahresfeier am 9. Juni 2018 Begrüßung durch den Präsidenten Thomas Holstein ................... 11 Grußwort des Präsidenten der Akademienunion Hanns Hatt ............ 13 Rechenschaftsbericht des Präsidenten ............................... 16 Verleihung der Preise ............................................. 23 Festvortrag von Eva Grebel: „Galaktische Archäologie“ ................. 24 II. Wissenschaftliche Vorträge Axel Michaels: „Sklaverei in Nepal“ .................................. 38 Detlev Weigel: „Klima im Wandel – Pflanzen im Wandel: Anpassung in der Natur und in der Züchtung“ ...................................... 41 Barbara Korte: „Verhandlungen des Heroischen
    [Show full text]
  • Vergangenheits- Politik. Die FDP Und Ihr Umgang Mit Dem National- Sozialismus
    HEUSS-FORUM 15/2017 Kristian Buchna „Liberale“ Vergangenheits- politik. Die FDP und ihr Umgang mit dem National- sozialismus Theodor-Heuss-Kolloquium 2017 Liberalismus und Nationalsozialismus – eine Beziehungsgeschichte 14.–15. September 2017 In Kooperation mit dem Institut für Zeitgeschichte München-Berlin und seinem Zentrum für Holocaust-Studien HEUSS-FORUM SI S N2 6 9 9 0- 1 6 4 www.stiftung-heuss-haus.de ϭ „Lierale“ Vergageheitspolitik Kristian Buchna Episoden der Wechselbeziehung von FDP und NS-Vergangenheit können mittlerweile als gut erforscht gelten, erwähnt sei nur die „Lierale“ Vergageheitspolitik. „Naumann-Affäre“ von 1953. Doch eine mo- Die FDP und ihr Umgang mit dem nographische Studie, wie sie jüngst etwa Kris- Nationalsozialismus tina Meyer über die SPD und die NS- Vergangenheit vorgelegt hat,2 bleibt im Falle der FDP noch immer ein Desiderat. In einem Am 11. Januar 1961 wandte sich Willy Max zwanzigminütigen Vortrag kann diese For- schungslücke nicht geschlossen werden, den- Rademacher, einstiges Mitglied der DDP und langjähriger Vorsitzender der betont linkslibe- noch möchte ich zur Geschichte des Umgangs der FDP mit dem Nationalsozialismus in der ralen FDP in Hamburg, in einem Brandbrief an den FDP-Parteivorsitzenden Erich Mende. Zeit von ihrer Parteigründung bis zur sozialli- beralen Koalition fünf Thesen formulieren, die Angesichts zahlreicher Eklats, ausgelöst durch ehemalige Nationalsozialisten innerhalb der verdeutlichen sollen, dass sich eine solche Geschichte natürlich nicht in skandalisierender FDP, beschwerte sich Rademacher über „illi- „Nazi-Zählerei“ erschöpfen darf, wie dies in berale Tendenzen“, die „für eine liberale Partei letzter Zeit in politisch motivierten Auftrags- unerträglich“ seien. „Immer wieder“, so Ra- arbeiten der Partei DIE LINKE geschieht,3 demacher, sondern dass sie vielmehr einen Beitrag zum „ist es die nicht bewältigte Vergangenheit, die besseren Verständnis des parteipolitischen gerade in unseren Reihen im Sinne einer Nachkriegsliberalismus leisten kann.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Fraktionsvorsitzende Und Parlamentarische Geschäftsführer Geschäftsführer
    ARCHIVALIE CDU/CSU-Fraktion im Deutschen Bundestag Seite: 102 Karton/AO Signatur: 08-001 Datum 2 Fraktionsvorsitzende und Parlamentarische Geschäftsführer Geschäftsführer 2.1 Fraktionsvorsitzende 2.1.1 Heinrich von Brentano Fraktionsvorsitzender 1949 - 1955 sowie 1961 - 1964. 292/4 - Brentano, Heinrich von 01.11.1949 - 03.12.1949 Hier: Bundeshauptstadt, Sitz: Zuschriften von Wählern und der Deutschen Wählergemeinschaft zur Abstimmung über den Sitz der Bundeshauptstadt 303/3 - Brentano, Heinrich von 03.11.1949 - 10.09.1955 Hier: Südweststaat: Informationsmaterial, Eingaben und Stellungnahmen von CDU-Gremien zur Badener Frage; Gutachten von Paul Zürcher zum Entwurf eines Neugliederungsgesetzes (1951); Informationsmaterial zu dem Rücktritt von Wilhelm Eckert; Ausarbeitung von Leo Wohleb; Schriftwechsel u.a. mit: Adenauer, Konrad Wuermeling, Franz-Josef Müller, Gebhard 292/3 - Brentano, Heinrich von 1950 Hier: Regierungsbauten Schriftwechsel zur Ausstattung, Kostenaufstellung 301/1 - Brentano, Heinrich von 1950 - 1951 Hier: Neuordnung der Eisen- und Stahlindustrie und des Kohlebergbaus: Schriftwechsel, Informationsmaterial 292/7 - Brentano, Heinrich von 1952 Hier: Verwaltungsrat der Deutschen Bundesbahn: Besprechungen, Schriftwechsel. 296/1 - Brentano, Heinrich von 1954 Hier: Bildung eines Koordinierungsausschusses: Schriftwechsel Paul Bausch/Rudolf Vogel; Ausarbeitung von Otto Lenz 313/3 - Brentano, Heinrich von 1954 Hier: Bundesministerium für Vertriebene, Flüchtlinge und Kriegsgeschädigte: Interfraktioneller Schriftwechsel mit Theodor
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the German Historical Institute Washington DC 44
    Bulletin of the German Historical Institute 44 | Spring 2009 5 Preface FEATURES 9 The Natural Sciences and Democratic Practices: Albert Einstein, Fritz Haber, and Max Planck Margit Szöllösi-Janze 23 Comment on Margit Szöllösi-Janze’s “The Natural Sciences and Democratic Practices” Cathryn Carson 29 Gender, Sexuality, and Belonging: Female Homosexuality in Germany, 1890-1933 Marti M. Lybeck 43 The Peaceful Revolution of the Fall of 1989 Marianne Birthler 59 Human Dignity and the Freedom of the Press Jutta Limbach GHI RESEARCH 71 Billy Graham’s Crusades in the 1950s: Neo-Evangelicalism between Civil Religion, Media, and Consumerism Uta Andrea Balbier CONFERENCE REPORTS 83 Proto-Eugenic Thinking before Galton Christoph Irmscher 89 Nature’s Accountability: Aggregation and Governmentality in the History of Sustainability Sabine Höhler and Rafael Ziegler 95 Trajectories of Decolonization: Elites and the Transformation from the Colonial to the Postcolonial Sönke Kunkel 100 Symposium in Memoriam of Gerald D. Feldman Uwe Spiekermann 104 Terrorism and Modernity: Global Perspectives on Nineteenth Century Political Violence Roni Dorot and Daniel Monterescu 112 A Whole New Game: Expanding the Boundaries of the History of Sports Christopher Young 118 Decoding Modern Consumer Societies: Preliminary Results, Ongoing Research, and Future Agendas Uwe Spiekermann 123 Global Migration Systems of Domestic and Care Workers Anke Ortlepp 128 17th Annual Symposium of the Friends of the GHI and Award of the Fritz Stern Dissertation Prize Richard F. Wetzell 130 Engineering Society: The “Scientifi cation of the Social” in Comparative Perspective, 1880-1990 Jochen F. Mayer 137 Writing East German History: What Difference Does the Cultural Turn Make? Heather L.
    [Show full text]
  • Autorinnen Und Autoren
    Autorinnen und Autoren Professor Dr. Ernst Benda, geb. 1925, Bundesminister des Innern a.D., Präsi• dent des Bundesverfassungsgerichts a.D., Mitglied des Senats der Deutschen Nationalstiftung. Professor Dr. Kurt Biedenkopf, geb. 1930, Ministerpräsident des Freistaates Sachsen a.D., Gründungspräsident der ,,Dresden International University", Vorsitzender des Senats der Deutschen Nationalstiftung. Dr. Andrzej Byrt, geb. 1949, Botschafter der Republik Polen in der BRD. Friedrich Dieckmann, geb. 1937, Vizepräsident der Sächsischen Akademie der Künste (Dresden), lebt als Schriftsteller in Berlin-Treptow. Eberhard Diepgen, geb. 1941, Regierender Bürgermeister von Berlin (1984- 1989 und 1991-2001), Rechtsanwalt bei Thümmel, Schütze & Partner. Dr. Mathias Döpfner, geb. 1963, Journalist, Vorstandsvorsitzender der ,,Axel Springer AG". Ernst Elitz, geb. 1941, diverse Stationen in Printmedien, Rundfunk und Fernsehen, Intendant des DeutschlandRadio KölnlBerlin. Professor Dr. med. Detlev Ganten, geb. 1941, Gründungsdirektor des Max­ Delbrück-Centrums für Molekulare Medizin (MDC ) Berlin-Buch. Professor Dr. Dieter Grimm, geb. 1937, Bundesverfassungsrichter a.D., Rektor des Wissenschaftskollegs zu Berlin. Volker Hassemer, geb. 1944, Senator a.D. für Stadtentwicklung und Um­ weltschutz (1981-1983 und 1991-1996), sowie für Kultur (1983-1989), Vor­ sitzender der Geschäftsführung der "Partner für Berlin GmbH" (1996-2002). 180 Autorinnen und Autoren Florian Illies, geb. 1971, Journalist und Schriftsteller. Professor Dr. h.c. Klaus-Dieter Lehmann, geb. 1940, Präsident der Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz. Professor Dr. Wolf Lepenies, geb. 1941, Permanent Fellow, von 1986 bis 2001 Rektor des Wissenschafts kollegs zu Berlin, Mitglied des Senats der Deutschen Nationalstiftung. Monika Maron, geb. 1941, Schriftstellerin in Berlin. Walter Momper, geb. 1945, Regierender Bürgermeister von Berlin (1989- 1991), Präsident des Bundesrates (1989-1990), Präsident des Abgeordneten­ hauses von Berlin (seit 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Commemorative Names in East Berlin, 1990 – 2010
    Crossroads: commemorative names in East Berlin, 1990 – 2010 A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History by Gary Vogel University of Canterbury 2012 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents ……………………………………………………………………....... 2 Table of Figures ………………………………………………………………………..... 3 Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………………… 4 Abstract ………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 Abbreviations……………………………………………………………………..……… 6 Introduction …………………………………………………………………………....... 7 Chapter One: Memory in the Landscape ……………………………………………... 10 Historiography...................................................................................................... 11 Extending previous literature................................................................................ 24 Sources.................................................................................................................. 26 Conclusion............................................................................................................ 28 Chapter Two: Politicised memory since 1945 …………………………………………. 30 Christian Democratic Union................................................................................. 31 Social Democratic Party....................................................................................... 42 Party of Democratic Socialism............................................................................. 47 Political affiliation and opinions of ordinary citizens..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Harmonizing the German Civil Code of the Nineteenth Century with a Modern Constitution—The Lüth Revolution 50 Years Ago in Comparative Perspective
    TULANE EUROPEAN AND CIVIL LAW FORUM VOLUME 23 2008 Harmonizing the German Civil Code of the Nineteenth Century with a Modern Constitution—The Lüth Revolution 50 Years Ago in Comparative Perspective Hannes Rösler* I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 2 II. CONSTITUTIONAL SPHERE OF THE U.S. AND GERMANY IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE ................................................................ 3 A. Grasping Constitutional Moments ............................................. 3 B. First Things First: Article 1 Basic Law and First Amendment ................................................................................. 5 C. Other Provisions of the Basic Law ............................................. 8 1. Free Development of One’s Personality ............................ 8 2. Freedom of Expression ...................................................... 9 D. U.S. Supreme Court as a Model for Setting up the BVerfG? ..................................................................................... 10 1. Courts’ Authorities ........................................................... 10 2. Procedural Law ................................................................. 13 III. PRIVATE LAW SPHERE ......................................................................... 15 A. General Aspects of the German Civil Code ............................ 15 B. Basic Elements of German Tort Law ....................................... 18 IV. DRAWING THE THREADS OF CONSTITUTION AND PRIVATE
    [Show full text]
  • Some Remarks on European and German Law in the Migration Crisis
    The Abyss of Complexity: Some Remarks on European and German Law in the Migration Crisis Nicolas Sölter, doctoral student at the Faculty of Law of the University of Hamburg February 2016 Introduction The diffuse reactions of EU Member States to current mass migration are a hardship test for European integration. Not only do proposals for solutions de lege ferenda oppose one another. Foremost, it is the unwillingness to comply with applicable law that once more appears as the underlying dilemma of the EU. Besides the common but unlawful practice of some Member States to forward migrants within the Schengen area to other Member States without any registration, the policy of examining applications from asylum seekers regardless of original responsibility as performed by the German government raises concerns as well. However, it is not only the violation of law but also the law itself that fosters inconsistent answers. The fragmentary and multi-layered framework of asylum law with its numerous actors of different levels and branches of public power leaves room for divergences. The dysfunction in one of the most vital policy areas on the European level challenges basic assumptions of statehood and rule of law. In the German debate on limiting the influx, not least the long-time fundamental dissent regarding the autonomy of constitutional spaces is emerging once again. Hence, a closer look at the events and relevant provisions seems worthwhile. Conscious decisions The causal chain of the migration crisis has been subject to countless discussions. Indisputably, the roots of the new dimension of migration lie in the many collapsing states in Africa and the Middle East, above all in war-torn Syria.
    [Show full text]