The Scottish Beaver Trial: Veterinary Monitoring of the Knapdale Beaver Population 2009-2014

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Scottish Beaver Trial: Veterinary Monitoring of the Knapdale Beaver Population 2009-2014 The Scottish Beaver Trial: Veterinary Monitoring of the Knapdale Beaver Population 2009-2014 Gidona Goodman DVM MSc (Wild Animal Health) MRCVS Exotic Animal and Wildlife Unit, R(D)SVS University of Edinburgh Page 2 of 20 The Scottish Beaver Trial: Veterinary Monitoring of the Knapdale Beaver Population 2009-2014 Gidona Goodman DVM MSc (Wild Animal Health) MRCVS Exotic Animal and Wildlife Unit, R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh Summary Sixteen Norwegian wild-caught beavers (Castor fiber) were released in Scotland between 2009 and 2010 as part of the five year Scottish Beaver Trial. All animals underwent a thorough clinical examination and were screened for a variety of animal and human pathogens. No significant pathogens were isolated that precluded any animal for release. Post-release health monitoring continued from 2010 to 2014 through trapping and visual observations. As a result of this monitoring one animal was removed from the trial due to poor body condition. Two animals died shortly after release; one with circulatory failure and one for which the cause of death was not determined. Two kits died, most likely due to predation. Body weights of adult beavers post-release remain within the expected weight range for Norwegian beavers. The University of Edinburgh, Goodman G. 2014. The Scottish Beaver Trial: Veterinary Monitoring of the Knapdale Beaver Population 2009-2014. [email protected] Page 3 of 20 Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction 4 1.1 Background 4 1.2 Objectives 4 2. Methodology and results 4 2.1 Pre-release health monitoring 4 2.1.1 Quarantine 4 2.1.2 Health assessment 5 2.1.3 Pathogen screening 6 2.2 Release of animals in to the wild 6 2.3 Post-release health monitoring 7 2.3.1 Health assessment 7 2.3.2 Post-release removal from the trial 8 3. Discussion 8 3.1 General discussion 8 3.2 Results 9 4. Health monitoring beyond the trial 10 5. Further release of beavers to the wild 10 5.1 Key points 10 6. References 11 Appendix A Scottish beaver Trial Family Tree 13 Appendix B Body weight and tail thickness of selected individual 14 beavers over the trial period Appendix C Health screen results of beavers released into Knapdale 17 2008-2014 Page 4 of 20 1. Introduction 1.1 Background In 2008 the Scottish Government granted a licence to the Scottish Wildlife Trust and the Royal Zoological Society of Scotland to conduct a five year trial on the reintroduction of the Eurasian beaver (Castor fiber) in Knapdale on the west coast of Scotland. Beavers have been extinct in Scotland since the 16th century due to hunting. This is the first controlled and licensed release of a wild mammal into the UK. In May 2009 eleven beavers (three families) trapped originally in Norway were released at Knapdale, followed by another five animals in 2010. 1.2 Objectives Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) is coordinating the independent monitoring programme to assess the impacts of the Scottish Beaver Trial. SNH is leading a number of monitoring projects in collaboration with various independent monitoring partners. Beaver health is one of the elements being monitored independently by the Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies. Veterinary input was provided by the author prior to the start of trial and throughout the five year period, to provide veterinary support and fulfil the following objectives: 1. Ensure animal welfare at all stages of the trial. 2. Ensure that reintroduced animals are fit and healthy for release. 3. Ensure no diseases of risk to livestock, wildlife or of risk to humans are introduced with the beavers. The veterinary involvement, guidelines and testing to meet the above objectives varied as the trial entered the different phases; pre-release, initial release and post- release. The report structure reflects these different phases. 2. Methodology and results The methodology and results of the beaver health monitoring from 2009-2014 are summarised in three different phases. 1. Pre-release when the beavers were in captivity during statutory quarantine and awaiting the results of health tests. 2. Release phase, which includes the days surrounding the release phase. 3. Post-release until the end of the trial duration. 2.1 Pre-release health monitoring 2.1.1 Quarantine Wild beavers were trapped in Norway, transported to the UK by air and placed in specially designated quarantine facilities. UK legislation at the time required imported beavers to be placed in approved rabies quarantine facilities for six months. Full details on the quarantine facilities and monitoring of animals during this period can be found in the SBT 2014 publication: The Scottish Beaver Trial: the story of the first licensed release of beavers into the wild in the UK (In press). Despite the beavers being housed in purpose built facilities, the main mortalities occurred during the quarantine period, with the deaths of six animals. No common cause of death was identified. Four animals had signs of infection or inflammation. Page 5 of 20 One adult female had an infected anal gland and colitis. No pathogens were isolated from either organ. Escherichia coli was isolated from the intestine and liver of a male kit with an inflammatory reaction in the small intestines. One adult female had a meningitis/encephalitis but no significant bacteria were cultured. An adult male had osteomyelitis of the coccygeal vertebra (Arcanobacterium pyogenes isolated) and liver necrosis. In two animals no primary cause could be identified, this included an autolysed female kit from which no pathogens were isolated and a juvenile female in poor body condition with severe intestinal parasitism. In view of these mortality events occurring while in captivity, a case was made to the Scottish government veterinary advisors to allow for a reduced quarantine period and to import the beavers under the Rabies (Importation of Dogs, Cats and Other Mammals) (England) (Amendment) Order 2004 which permits the import of rodents to zoos and research institutes without rabies quarantine. The probability of these animals being infected with rabies was negligible as Norway’s mainland was considered rabies-free. Subsequently, four animals were allowed into Scotland following veterinary certification by an official Norwegian Food and Safety (Mattilsynet) veterinarian declaring them rabies-free. They were held in Norway for a month to complete other health tests prior to direct transfer to Scotland. 2.1.2 Health assessment All animals were examined thoroughly under general anaesthesia about a month prior to release (Fig. 1). This allowed for a detailed clinical examination. The clinical examination followed normal veterinary practices and included examination of the head (eyes, ears and teeth), skin, fur and tail (for ectoparasites and injuries), abdominal palpation, auscultation and cardiac evaluation. All animals were weighed and a subcutaneous microchip was inserted, or previous placement confirmed, under the skin at the back of the neck. The gender of each animal was also confirmed using one or more methods such as palpation of the baculum (or penis) or the color and viscosity of the anal gland secretions. Blood samples were taken to verify that haematological and biochemical blood values were within the normal range for this species and to check that there was no underlying disease (see 2.1.3). Figure 1. Auscultation of a beaver under general anaesthesia. Page 6 of 20 2.1.3 Pathogen screening The list of potential diseases included in the pre-release health screens were based on the International Union of Conservation of Nature guidelines (IUCN) for rodents published by Woodford (2000) and incorporated governmental (Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) and public health concerns such as rabies, giardiasis and tularaemia. A literature search on reported diseases in captive and wild beavers was also used to complete the list using CAB ABSTRACTS, BIOSIS and MEDLINE databases. Appendix C summarises the health screen results per individual animal. Faecal samples were submitted for bacterial enteric pathogens. Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp., Clostridium spp. and Yersinia spp. were specifically requested. Faecal samples also underwent floatation with saturated salt solution for nematodes and sedimentation for trematodes. Faecal samples were screened for Giardia spp. and Cryptosporidium spp. Serology was used to screen for antibodies to Franciscella tularensis and Leptospira spp. All animals were negative for zoonotic enteric bacterial pathogens such as Campylobacter spp. Salmonella and Yersinia spp. Neither Giardia spp. nor Cryptosporidium spp. were detected. All animals were seronegative for Franciscella tularensis antibodies. In our program five animals were seropositive for Leptospira spp. antibodies. This included the serovars L. saxkoebing, L. canicola, L. copenhageni, L. icterohaemorrhagiae, L. autumnalis and L. javanica. Numerous helminths were identified in the faecal samples. In eight animals Travassosius rufus and beaver fluke (Stichorchis subtriquetrus) were the most commonly identified parasites. The Norwegian beavers were not deemed at risk of being infected with Echinococcus multilocularis as Norway was considered E. multilocularis free at the time. There was also no ante-mortem diagnostic test available although a novel serological test is being developed (Gottstein et al. 2014). Haematology and biochemistry results were within normal reference range for Eurasian beavers (Girling et al. Pers. Comm). This phase of the report has also been published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal (Goodman et al. 2012). 2.2 Release of animals into the wild In May 2009 three families (eleven individuals) were released to three separate lochs within the Knapdale trial site (see Appendix A family tree). This was followed by the release of five additional animals in 2010. Animals were assessed visually prior to release for normal breathing rhythm and pattern, body condition and demeanour. Only animals deemed fit were released into the wild. The number of people at the release site was limited and beaver individuals were observed visually post-release.
Recommended publications
  • Insecta: Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae), with a Description of Sciaphyes Shestakovi Sp.N
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny Jahr/Year: 2011 Band/Volume: 69 Autor(en)/Author(s): Fresneda Javier, Grebennikov Vasily V., Ribera Ignacio Artikel/Article: The phylogenetic and geographic limits of Leptodirini (Insecta: Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae), with a description of Sciaphyes shestakovi sp.n. from the Russian Far East 99-123 Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 99 69 (2) 99 –123 © Museum für Tierkunde Dresden, eISSN 1864-8312, 21.07.2011 The phylogenetic and geographic limits of Leptodirini (Insecta: Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae), with a description of Sciaphyes shestakovi sp. n. from the Russian Far East JAVIER FRESNEDA 1, 2, VASILY V. GREBENNIKOV 3 & IGNACIO RIBERA 4, * 1 Ca de Massa, 25526 Llesp, Lleida, Spain 2 Museu de Ciències Naturals (Zoologia), Passeig Picasso s/n, 08003 Barcelona, Spain [[email protected]] 3 Ottawa Plant Laboratory, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada [[email protected]] 4 Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-UPF), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37 – 49, 08003 Barcelona, Spain [[email protected]] * Corresponding author Received 26.iv.2011, accepted 27.v.2011. Published online at www.arthropod-systematics.de on 21.vii.2011. > Abstract The tribe Leptodirini of the beetle family Leiodidae is one of the most diverse radiations of cave animals, with a distribution centred north of the Mediterranean basin from the Iberian Peninsula to Iran. Six genera outside this core area, most notably Platycholeus Horn, 1880 in the western United States and others in East Asia, have been assumed to be related to Lepto- dirini.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 104, NUMBER 7 THE FEEDING APPARATUS OF BITING AND SUCKING INSECTS AFFECTING MAN AND ANIMALS BY R. E. SNODGRASS Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine Agricultural Research Administration U. S. Department of Agriculture (Publication 3773) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION OCTOBER 24, 1944 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 104, NUMBER 7 THE FEEDING APPARATUS OF BITING AND SUCKING INSECTS AFFECTING MAN AND ANIMALS BY R. E. SNODGRASS Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine Agricultural Research Administration U. S. Department of Agriculture P£R\ (Publication 3773) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION OCTOBER 24, 1944 BALTIMORE, MO., U. S. A. THE FEEDING APPARATUS OF BITING AND SUCKING INSECTS AFFECTING MAN AND ANIMALS By R. E. SNODGRASS Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine, Agricultural Research Administration, U. S. Department of Agriculture CONTENTS Page Introduction 2 I. The cockroach. Order Orthoptera 3 The head and the organs of ingestion 4 General structure of the head and mouth parts 4 The labrum 7 The mandibles 8 The maxillae 10 The labium 13 The hypopharynx 14 The preoral food cavity 17 The mechanism of ingestion 18 The alimentary canal 19 II. The biting lice and booklice. Orders Mallophaga and Corrodentia. 21 III. The elephant louse 30 IV. The sucking lice. Order Anoplura 31 V. The flies. Order Diptera 36 Mosquitoes. Family Culicidae 37 Sand flies. Family Psychodidae 50 Biting midges. Family Heleidae 54 Black flies. Family Simuliidae 56 Net-winged midges. Family Blepharoceratidae 61 Horse flies. Family Tabanidae 61 Snipe flies. Family Rhagionidae 64 Robber flies. Family Asilidae 66 Special features of the Cyclorrhapha 68 Eye gnats.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaver Management Technical Paper #3 Beaver Life History and Ecology Best Science Review
    Beaver Management Technical Paper #3 Beaver Life History and Ecology Best Science Review April 2020 Alternate Formats Available Beaver Management Technical Paper #3 Beaver Life History and Ecology Best Science Review Submitted by: Jen Vanderhoof King County Water and Land Resources Division Department of Natural Resources and Parks Beaver Life History and Ecology Best Science Review Acknowledgements Extensive review and comments were provided by Bailey Keeler on the “Diet” and “Territoriality & Scent Mounds” sections, and she wrote a portion of the “Predation” section. Review and comments were provided by Bailey Keeler, Brandon Duncan, Matt MacDonald, and Kate O’Laughlin of King County. Dawn Duddleson, librarian for Water and Land Resources Division, obtained the majority of the papers cited in this report. Tom Ventur provided technical support and formatting for this document. Citation King County. 2020. Beaver management technical paper #3: beaver life history and ecology best science review. Prepared by Jen Vanderhoof, Water and Land Resources Division. Seattle, Washington. King County Science and Technical Support Section i April 2020 Beaver Life History and Ecology Best Science Review Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .....................................................................................................................1 2.0 Beaver Populations .........................................................................................................3 2.1 History .........................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Ectoparasitic Insects Genera of Veterinary Importance and Some Aspects of Their Control
    American Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Vol. 4, No. 4, 2018, pp. 116-123 http://www.aiscience.org/journal/ajefm ISSN: 2381-6864 (Print); ISSN: 2381-6902 (Online) Ectoparasitic Insects Genera of Veterinary Importance and Some Aspects of Their Control Muhammad Sarwar 1, *, Arfa Rauf 2 1National Institute for Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering (NIBGE) , Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan 2Allied Hospital- Punjab Medical College, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan Abstract Agricultural animals (those used for production of food and fibre- livestock) and companion animals (pets such as dogs and cats) may be affected by arthropod pests. Insects as veterinary ectoparasites have a significant impact on the health, wellbeing and productivity of their animal vertebrate hosts. These impacts can be either direct, through tissue damage and blood loss, or indirect, through their role as vectors of viral, bacterial, protozoa and helminth pathogens. A second category of indirect effects are those that result from the alteration of host behaviour induced by arthropod attack and blood-feeding activity. So, the present article aims to contribute fundamental scientific knowledge in the areas of insects as veterinary ectoparasites and also the processes ensuring to the public for underlying the protection from biting and diseases borne. The insect ectoparasites include flies (Diptera), lice (Mallophaga), fleas (Siphonaptera) and bugs (Hemiptera). These insects have a profound impact on the health of animals by causing annoyance, inflicting bites and stings, and transmitting of diseases. Animals can be greatly annoyed by the presence and activity of certain insects. For example, cattle will bunch up and put their lowered heads together to seek relief when fly strike is severe; scratching may be symptoms of fleas or lice; and head shaking may indicate the presence of insects in ear.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Record of the Parasitic Beaver Beetle (Platypsyllus Castoris) (Coleoptera: Leiodidae) from Stavropol Territory (Russia)
    Available online at www.easletters.com Entomology and Applied Science ISSN No: 2349-2864 Letters, 2014, 1, 4:1-3 A new record of the parasitic beaver beetle (Platypsyllus Castoris) (Coleoptera: Leiodidae) from Stavropol Territory (Russia) S.V. Pushkin North Caucasian Federal University, Institute of Live Systems, Botany, Zoology and General Biology Department; 355009 (Stavropol), Russia Correspondence: [email protected] (Received: 12/8/14 ) (Accepted:2/10/14) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT Platypsyllus castoris Ritsema, 1869 previously noted only in Voronezh Region is found in Stavropol area (Russia) for the first time. This species was collected not on beaver, for which it was cited earlier, but on river otter ((Lutra lutra meridionalis (Ognev 1931)) – rare species of the North Caucasian region. Key words : Coleoptera, Leiodidae, Platypsyllus castoris , Stavropol area Russia. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION In 2013, the hairline Caucasian otter ((Lutra lutra meridionalis (Ognev, 1931)) collected near Budennovska, Pyatigorsk; Stavropol Krai (Kuban river) were collected 2 female beaver beetles Platypsyllus castoris Ritsema, 1869. This is the third discovery of this interesting parasitic insect with the European part of the former USSR, distant to the south for 300 km from the first [12] and about 100 from the second [1]. Particular interest is the fact that this is the second in the European part of the finding of this species parasitic on the otter, and not on traditional host – beaver. MATERIALS AND METHODS The material gathered the standard zoological methods. In total 2 females of a species are collected. 5 otters are examined. During researches any animal has not suffered. The account of number of an otter in territory of Stavropol territory is in passing spent.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasitic Fauna of Eurasian Beavers (Castor Fiber) in Sweden (1997–1998)
    Åhlen et al. Acta Vet Scand (2021) 63:23 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-021-00588-w Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica RESEARCH Open Access Parasitic fauna of Eurasian beavers (Castor fber) in Sweden (1997–1998) Per‑Arne Åhlen1,3, Göran Sjöberg1* and Margareta Stéen2 Abstract Background: The parasitic fauna of beavers (Castor fber and C. canadensis) has been well studied in many parts of their respective areas of distribution. In Scandinavia there have, however, been limited investigations conducted on the parasites of beavers in recent times. The present study is the frst quantitative survey of parasites on beavers living in Sweden and elsewhere in Scandinavia. We investigated the parasitic fauna of the Eurasian beaver (C. fber) in a North–South gradient in Sweden. The aim of the study was to investigate parasite distribution and prevalence in particular, related to average yearly air temperature and diferent age groups of beavers. A total of 30 beavers were sampled at eight localities, spanning a 720 km North–South gradient during the springs of 1997 and 1998. Results: Five parasite taxa were identifed. Four of these were present in all of the examined beavers, Stichorchis subtriquetrus (trematode), Travassosius rufus (nematode), Platypsyllus castoris (coleopteran), and Schizocarpus spp. (arachnid). A higher number of new infections of S. subtriquetrus, and more adults of T. rufus, were seen in beavers in southern Sweden where temperatures are higher. One‑year old beavers had a higher infestation of S. subtriquetrus, but not of T. rufus, than older individuals. Conclusions: The parasite fauna of Swedish beavers mirrored the impoverished parasite fauna of the original Norwe‑ gian population, and the high prevalence of parasites could be due to low major histocompatibility complex (MHC) polymorphism.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Beaver Trapping and Health Screening Report River Otter Beaver Trial
    Final Beaver Trapping and Health Screening Report River Otter Beaver Trial Report prepared for Devon Wildlife Trust Dr R. Campbell-Palmer BSc MSC PhD [email protected] and Dr S. Girling BVMS(Hons) DZooMed DipECZM(ZHM) CBiol FRSB EurProBiol FRCVS Royal Zoological Society of Scotland [email protected] 2019 ROBT Final Health Report Summary • Full health screening of the original founder beavers did not demonstrate any evidence of significant zoonotic disease, including Giardia spp., Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp., Yersinia spp., Cryptosporidium parvum, Echinococcus multilocularis, Franciscella tularensis and Mycobacterium spp. • Exposure and seroconversion to Leptospira spp. was evident in one of the founder beavers and three others over the five-year trial. Subsequent testing showed waning of the antibody response with no clinical disease being evident suggesting these animals were not persistently infected. • No evidence of significant clinical disease in the beavers on the River Otter during the 5 years with overall good body condition being maintained from one year to the next. Campbell-Palmer & Girling 2019 2 ROBT Final Health Report Contents Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Contents ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eurasian Beaver (Castor Fiber)
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349031376 Eurasian beaver (Castor fiber) health surveillance in Britain: Assessing a disjunctive reintroduced population Article in The Veterinary record · February 2021 DOI: 10.1002/vetr.84 CITATIONS READS 0 29 12 authors, including: Róisín Campbell-Palmer Frank Rosell Self-employed University of South-Eastern Norway 52 PUBLICATIONS 326 CITATIONS 182 PUBLICATIONS 3,529 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Adam Naylor Georgina Cole Royal Zoological Society of Scotland (RZSS) Royal Zoological Society of Scotland (RZSS) 16 PUBLICATIONS 16 CITATIONS 13 PUBLICATIONS 87 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: BVR Project - Beavers.Voyageurs.Research. View project Species Action Framework View project All content following this page was uploaded by Frank Rosell on 11 February 2021. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Received: 28 April 2020 Revised: 20 December 2020 Accepted: 10 January 2021 DOI: 10.1002/vetr.84 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Eurasian beaver (Castor fiber) health surveillance in Britain: Assessing a disjunctive reintroduced population Róisín Campbell-Palmer1 Frank Rosell2 Adam Naylor3 Georgina Cole3 Stephanie Mota3 Donna Brown3 Mary Fraser4 Romain Pizzi3 Mark Elliott5 Kelsey Wilson6 Martin Gaywood7 Simon Girling3 1 Independent Consultant, Edinburgh, UK Abstract 2 Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Background: Numerous translocations of Eurasian beavers have occurred Environmental Health Studies, University of with little implementation of standardised health screening. Pre-release Southeast Norway, Bø, Norway health screening enables the selection of individuals with the best survival 3 Veterinary Department, Royal Zoological prospects and reduces potential health risks, but this is by-passed during Society of Scotland, Scotland, UK unofficial releases.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Evidence of Interactions Between
    The funders of this report should be acknowledged here. These are understood to be: The Angling Trust The River Otter Fisheries Association South West Rivers Association Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust Salmon and Trout Conservation Atlantic Salmon Trust REVIEW OF EVIDENCE OF INTERACTIONS BETWEEN BEAVERS AND FISH AND FISHERIES IN ENGLAND AND Affiliation of the author to the WALES University of Hull should be stated here, unless there is some reason that this work is not considered to be an academic report. Prof. Ian G. Cowx Peer-review of Cowx (2020), Professor Richard Brazier, February, 2020. Main points 1. This report is presented as an independent review, however, no explanation is given as to how the author has maintained an objective approach, given the funders of the work. 2. No statement has been made as to how the author has avoided bias or ensured that a balanced view of the impact of beaver on fish and fisheries is presented, in the absence of peer review of the report. 3. Throughout the document, the author violates the basic rules of writing a systematic review: (a) Opinions are regularly presented as fact, with no reference to the peer-reviewed literature to substantiate the views that are put forward, (b) References that are presented are highly selective to enforce negative preconceptions of beaver impacts, (c) Balanced, well-reasoned arguments are almost entirely lacking, due to a near complete absence of argument versus counter-argument (again unsupported by peer-reviewed references), (d) Poor understanding of the literature is rife, as is misinterpretation and/or disagreement with peer-reviewed literature, with no sound, scientific basis for such disagreement, (e) search terms for research papers, relevant to the topic, are inappropriate and bias the literature searchDecem towardsber 2020 negative impacts and (f) many important papers have not been read or referenced, illustrating significant gaps in the authors knowledge and demonstrating that he does not have the expertise to undertake such a review.
    [Show full text]
  • SNH Commissioned Report 815; a Review Of
    Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 815 A review of beaver (Castor spp.) impacts on biodiversity, and potential impacts following a reintroduction to Scotland COMMISSIONED REPORT Commissioned Report No. 815 A review of beaver (Castor spp.) impacts on biodiversity, and potential impacts following a reintroduction to Scotland For further information on this report please contact: Martin Gaywood Scottish Natural Heritage Great Glen House INVERNESS IV3 8NW Telephone: 01463 725230 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Stringer, A.P., Blake, D. & Gaywood, M.J. 2015. A review of beaver (Castor spp.) impacts on biodiversity, and potential impacts following a reintroduction to Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 815. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2015. COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary A review of beaver (Castor spp.) impacts on biodiversity, and potential impacts following a reintroduction to Scotland Commissioned Report No. 815 Project No: 15442 Year of publication: 2015 Keywords Castor spp; biodiversity; meta-analysis; Scotland; ecosystem engineer; species; habitats. Background This report has been published to help inform the Scottish Government on its decision on the future of beavers within Scotland (see Gaywood, 2015). Beavers are widely considered to be ‘ecosystem engineers’. This term is reserved for those species that have a large impact on an environment, fundamentally changing ecosystems, and creating highly unusual habitats, often considered unique.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Check List of Aquatic and Riparian/Littoral Beetle Families of the World (Coleoptera) 25-42 © Wiener Coleopterologenverein, Zool.-Bot
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Water Beetles of China Jahr/Year: 1998 Band/Volume: 2 Autor(en)/Author(s): Jäch Manfred A. Artikel/Article: Annotated check list of aquatic and riparian/littoral beetle families of the world (Coleoptera) 25-42 © Wiener Coleopterologenverein, Zool.-Bot. Ges. Österreich, Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at M.A. JACH & L. Ji (cds.): Water Hectics of China Vol. II 25 - 42 Wien, December 1998 Annotated check list of aquatic and riparian/littoral beetle families of the world (Coleoptera) M.A.JÄCH Abstract An annotated check list of aquatic and riparian beetle families of the world is compiled. Definitions are proposed for the terms "True Water Beetles", "False Water Beetles", "Phytophilous Water Beetles", "Parasitic Water Beetles", "Facultative Water Beetles" and "Shore Beetles". Hydroscaplia hunanensis Pu is recorded for the first time from Shaanxi. Key words: Coleoptera, Water Beetles, aquatic Coleoptera, riparian Coleoptera, key, China. Introduction "Is this a Water Beetle ?", I am frequently asked by students, fellow entomologists, ecologists, or limnologists. This seemingly harmless question often turns out to be most disconcerting, especially 1) when the behaviour of that beetle species is not exactly known or 2) when it is known to live in a habitat that is neither truly aquatic nor truly terrestrial, or 3) when it is known to be able to live both subaquatically and terrestrially (in the same or in different developmental stages). There are numerous different types of aquatic habitats containing water of atmospheric origin: oceans, lakes, rivers, springs, ditches, puddles, phytotelmata, seepages, ground water.
    [Show full text]
  • Reintroducing Beavers Castor Fiber to Britain: a Disease Risk Analysis Simon J
    bs_bs_banner Mammal Review ISSN 0305-1838 REVIEW Reintroducing beavers Castor fiber to Britain: a disease risk analysis Simon J. GIRLING* Veterinary Department, Royal Zoological Society of Scotland, 134 Corstorphine Road, Edinburgh, EH12 6TS, UK. Email: [email protected] Adam NAYLOR Veterinary Department, Royal Zoological Society of Scotland, 134 Corstorphine Road, Edinburgh, EH12 6TS, UK. Email: [email protected] Mary FRASER G&F Training and Consultancy, Perthshire, PH2 9QD, UK. Email: [email protected] Róisín CAMPBELL‐PALMER Edinburgh, EH7 6NH, UK. Email: [email protected] Keywords ABSTRACT Castor fiber, Eurasian beaver, health screening, reintroduction, species restoration 1. Eurasian beavers Castor fiber are potential hosts for a range of infectious diseases and parasites, including those typical of common European rodents. *Correspondence author. A number of infectious organisms are potentially zoonotic and may be no- tifiable under animal health legislation. The official trial beaver reintroductions Submitted: 21 February 2019 to Scotland, the retrospectively licensed releases in England, and the increas- Returned for revision: 23 April 2019 ingly obvious presence of large numbers of unlicensed illegally released animals Revision accepted: 26 April 2019 have highlighted potential disease risks. Editor: DR doi: 10.1111/mam.12163 2. We aimed to conduct a disease risk analysis, based on peer reviewed publica- tions, for selection and health screening of Eurasian beavers prior to release into the wild in Britain. 3. Adapted from the International Union for the Conservation of Nature’s ‘Guidelines for Disease Risk Analysis’, a four‐step process was used to for- mulate a disease risk analysis: 1) problem description; 2) hazard identification based on literature review; 3) risk assessment, which resulted in categorisation of pathogens into low, medium, and high risk; and 4) risk management: identification of mitigating measures, followed by risk re‐evaluation in light of the reported effectiveness of the mitigation measures.
    [Show full text]