DOCSLIB.ORG

Beaver Management Technical Paper #3 Beaver Life History and Ecology Best Science Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Beaver Management Technical Paper #3 Beaver Life History and Ecology Best Science Review Beaver Management Technical Paper #3 Beaver Life History and Ecology Best Science Review April 2020 Alternate Formats Available Beaver Management Technical Paper #3 Beaver Life History and Ecology Best Science Review Submitted by: Jen Vanderhoof King County Water and Land Resources Division Department of Natural Resources and Parks Beaver Life History and Ecology Best Science Review Acknowledgements Extensive review and comments were provided by Bailey Keeler on the “Diet” and “Territoriality & Scent Mounds” sections, and she wrote a portion of the “Predation” section. Review and comments were provided by Bailey Keeler, Brandon Duncan, Matt MacDonald, and Kate O’Laughlin of King County. Dawn Duddleson, librarian for Water and Land Resources Division, obtained the majority of the papers cited in this report. Tom Ventur provided technical support and formatting for this document. Citation King County. 2020. Beaver management technical paper #3: beaver life history and ecology best science review. Prepared by Jen Vanderhoof, Water and Land Resources Division. Seattle, Washington. King County Science and Technical Support Section i April 2020 Beaver Life History and Ecology Best Science Review Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .....................................................................................................................1 2.0 Beaver Populations .........................................................................................................3 2.1 History .........................................................................................................................3 2.1.1 Historic populations and trapping ............................................................................ 3 2.1.2 Reintroduction.........................................................................................................4 2.2 Current population estimates ....................................................................................... 8 2.3 Carrying capacity .........................................................................................................9 3.0 Biology ..........................................................................................................................10 3.1 Size ...........................................................................................................................10 3.2 Adaptations ............................................................................................................... 10 3.3 Diet ............................................................................................................................11 3.3.1 Types of food consumed ....................................................................................... 12 3.3.2 Seasonality of food consumed .............................................................................. 13 3.3.3 Preferred species .................................................................................................. 15 3.3.4 Amount of food ..................................................................................................... 18 3.3.5 Re-sprouting species ............................................................................................ 21 3.3.6 Distance to forage ................................................................................................. 23 3.3.7 Winter food caches ............................................................................................... 23 3.3.8 Reingestion and excrement .................................................................................. 25 4.0 Life History .................................................................................................................... 27 4.1 Colonies / Family Units .............................................................................................. 29 4.1.1 Colony composition .............................................................................................. 29 4.1.2 Colony size ........................................................................................................... 31 4.1.3 Colony density ...................................................................................................... 33 4.1.4 Colony longevity ................................................................................................... 35 4.2 Reproduction and productivity ................................................................................... 36 4.2.1 Beaver longevity ................................................................................................... 36 4.2.2 Breeding age ........................................................................................................ 36 4.2.3 Litter size .............................................................................................................. 37 4.2.4 Density dependence and impacts of harvest ......................................................... 39 4.2.5 Timing of breeding, parturition, and emergence .................................................... 40 King County Science and Technical Support Section ii April 2020 Beaver Life History and Ecology Best Science Review 4.3 Dispersal ................................................................................................................... 40 4.3.1 Challenges with learning about beaver dispersal .................................................. 41 4.3.2 Age at dispersal from the natal colony .................................................................. 42 4.3.3 Timing of dispersal ................................................................................................ 43 4.3.4 Direction of dispersal ............................................................................................ 45 4.3.5 Dispersal distance ................................................................................................ 45 4.4 Home Range and Territory ........................................................................................ 47 4.4.1 Scent mounds ....................................................................................................... 47 4.4.2 Agonistic behavior ................................................................................................ 52 4.5 Illness and Death ....................................................................................................... 53 4.5.1 Diseases and parasites ......................................................................................... 53 4.5.2 Predation .............................................................................................................. 56 4.5.3 Other causes of mortality ...................................................................................... 57 4.5.4 Mortality rates ....................................................................................................... 59 5.0 Engineering ................................................................................................................... 61 5.1 Tree cutting for food and construction material .......................................................... 61 5.1.1 Tree size preferences ........................................................................................... 61 5.1.2 Distances traversed for trees ................................................................................ 62 5.1.3 Size-distance relationship ..................................................................................... 65 5.1.4 Raft construction ................................................................................................... 66 5.1.5 Tree waste ............................................................................................................ 66 5.1.6 Beavers as farmers ............................................................................................... 67 5.2 Beaver ponds ............................................................................................................ 68 5.3 Dams .........................................................................................................................69 5.3.1 Dam site selection ................................................................................................ 70 5.3.2 Dam building and repair ........................................................................................ 72 5.3.3 Dam size ............................................................................................................... 75 5.3.4 Multiple dams per colony ...................................................................................... 76 5.4 Lodges ......................................................................................................................78 5.4.1 Island lodges ........................................................................................................ 78 5.4.2 Bank lodges .......................................................................................................... 82 5.5 Canals .......................................................................................................................84 5.5.1 Canal engineering ................................................................................................. 87 King County Science and Technical Support Section iii April 2020 Beaver Life History and Ecology Best Science Review 5.5.2 Extreme examples of ingenuity ............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Beaver Management in Pennsylvania 2010-2019
    Beaver Management in Pennsylvania (2010-2019) prepared by Tom Hardisky Wildlife Biologist Pennsylvania Game Commission April 2011 So important was the pursuit of the beaver as an influence in westward movement of the American frontier that it is sometimes suggested that this furbearer would be a more appropriate symbol of the United States than the bald eagle. -- Encyclopedia Americana 12:178, 1969. This plan was prepared and will be implemented at no cost to Pennsylvania taxpayers. The Pennsylvania Game Commission is an independently-funded agency, relying on license sales, State Game Land timber, mineral, and oil/gas revenues, and federal excise taxes on sporting arms and ammunition. The Game Commission does not receive any state general fund money collected through taxes. For more than 115 years, sportsmen and women have funded game, non-game, and endangered species programs involving birds and mammals in Pennsylvania. Hunters and trappers continue to financially support all of Pennsylvania’s wildlife programs including beaver management. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Native Americans maintained a well-calculated balance between beaver populations and man for centuries. The importance of beavers to the livelihood and culture of native North Americans was paramount. When western civilization nearly wiped out beavers in Europe, then successfully proceeded to do the same in North America, the existence of beavers was seriously endangered across the continent. Native American respect for beavers was replaced by European greed over a 300-year period. Conservation-minded individuals and state agencies began beaver recovery efforts during the early 1900s. The return of beavers to most of North America was a miraculous wildlife management achievement.
    [Show full text]
  • Educator's Guide
    Educator’s Guide the jill and lewis bernard family Hall of north american mammals inside: • Suggestions to Help You come prepared • essential questions for Student Inquiry • Strategies for teaching in the exhibition • map of the Exhibition • online resources for the Classroom • Correlations to science framework • glossary amnh.org/namammals Essential QUESTIONS Who are — and who were — the North as tundra, winters are cold, long, and dark, the growing season American Mammals? is extremely short, and precipitation is low. In contrast, the abundant precipitation and year-round warmth of tropical All mammals on Earth share a common ancestor and and subtropical forests provide optimal growing conditions represent many millions of years of evolution. Most of those that support the greatest diversity of species worldwide. in this hall arose as distinct species in the relatively recent Florida and Mexico contain some subtropical forest. In the past. Their ancestors reached North America at different boreal forest that covers a huge expanse of the continent’s times. Some entered from the north along the Bering land northern latitudes, winters are dry and severe, summers moist bridge, which was intermittently exposed by low sea levels and short, and temperatures between the two range widely. during the Pleistocene (2,588,000 to 11,700 years ago). Desert and scrublands are dry and generally warm through- These migrants included relatives of New World cats (e.g. out the year, with temperatures that may exceed 100°F and dip sabertooth, jaguar), certain rodents, musk ox, at least two by 30 degrees at night. kinds of elephants (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 104, NUMBER 7 THE FEEDING APPARATUS OF BITING AND SUCKING INSECTS AFFECTING MAN AND ANIMALS BY R. E. SNODGRASS Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine Agricultural Research Administration U. S. Department of Agriculture (Publication 3773) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION OCTOBER 24, 1944 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 104, NUMBER 7 THE FEEDING APPARATUS OF BITING AND SUCKING INSECTS AFFECTING MAN AND ANIMALS BY R. E. SNODGRASS Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine Agricultural Research Administration U. S. Department of Agriculture P£R\ (Publication 3773) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION OCTOBER 24, 1944 BALTIMORE, MO., U. S. A. THE FEEDING APPARATUS OF BITING AND SUCKING INSECTS AFFECTING MAN AND ANIMALS By R. E. SNODGRASS Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine, Agricultural Research Administration, U. S. Department of Agriculture CONTENTS Page Introduction 2 I. The cockroach. Order Orthoptera 3 The head and the organs of ingestion 4 General structure of the head and mouth parts 4 The labrum 7 The mandibles 8 The maxillae 10 The labium 13 The hypopharynx 14 The preoral food cavity 17 The mechanism of ingestion 18 The alimentary canal 19 II. The biting lice and booklice. Orders Mallophaga and Corrodentia. 21 III. The elephant louse 30 IV. The sucking lice. Order Anoplura 31 V. The flies. Order Diptera 36 Mosquitoes. Family Culicidae 37 Sand flies. Family Psychodidae 50 Biting midges. Family Heleidae 54 Black flies. Family Simuliidae 56 Net-winged midges. Family Blepharoceratidae 61 Horse flies. Family Tabanidae 61 Snipe flies. Family Rhagionidae 64 Robber flies. Family Asilidae 66 Special features of the Cyclorrhapha 68 Eye gnats.
    [Show full text]
  • HOVERFLY NEWSLETTER Dipterists
    HOVERFLY NUMBER 41 NEWSLETTER SPRING 2006 Dipterists Forum ISSN 1358-5029 As a new season begins, no doubt we are all hoping for a more productive recording year than we have had in the last three or so. Despite the frustration of recent seasons it is clear that national and international study of hoverflies is in good health, as witnessed by the success of the Leiden symposium and the Recording Scheme’s report (though the conundrum of the decline in UK records of difficult species is mystifying). New readers may wonder why the list of literature references from page 15 onwards covers publications for the year 2000 only. The reason for this is that for several issues nobody was available to compile these lists. Roger Morris kindly agreed to take on this task and to catch up for the missing years. Each newsletter for the present will include a list covering one complete year of the backlog, and since there are two newsletters per year the backlog will gradually be eliminated. Once again I thank all contributors and I welcome articles for future newsletters; these may be sent as email attachments, typed hard copy, manuscript or even dictated by phone, if you wish. Please do not forget the “Interesting Recent Records” feature, which is rather sparse in this issue. Copy for Hoverfly Newsletter No. 42 (which is expected to be issued with the Autumn 2006 Dipterists Forum Bulletin) should be sent to me: David Iliff, Green Willows, Station Road, Woodmancote, Cheltenham, Glos, GL52 9HN, (telephone 01242 674398), email: [email protected], to reach me by 20 June 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • The Audubon Observer
    The Audubon Observer Winter 2014-15 Edition A publication of Duval Audubon Society Serving Clay, Duval and Nassau counties since 1939 Winter Programs General Program Information Unless otherwise indicated, all programs are held at: Swaim Memorial United Methodist Church 1620 Naldo Avenue Jacksonville, FL 32207 BEST OF ALL OF US – 75th Anniversary Photos and Potluck Dinner December 15 @ 7:00PM Speaker: DAS Members Help us celebrate our chapter’s 75th anniversary. Bring a dish to the potluck dinner to share. This is also an opportunity to share your favorite birding images from your travels. Please store the photos on a jump drive. We’ll start at 7:00 p.m., a half-hour earlier than usual. BIRDING IN A CHANGING WORLD January 19 @ 7:30PM Speaker: Carolyn Antman, President of Duval Audubon Society How will the birds respond to shifting climate patterns? Will there be new migration routes? Will they be seeking food and rest in new areas? Will you have a different set of backyard birds? National change. Learn what their scientists anticipate in the years to come and see what they think we can do toAudubon facilitate Society our feathered released friends a major as scientific the environment paper on changes.September 9, 2014 regarding birds and climate Royal Terns and chicks (D. Kainauskas) Red Knots (C. Wainwright) UNLOCKING THE SECRETS OF THE MANGROVE CUCKOO February 16 @ 7:30PM Speaker: Rachel Mullin, Research Biologist, Ecostudies Institute Ecostudies has accepted the challenge of studying one of North America’s most poorly known species, the Mangrove Cuckoo, a species that is extremely rare and disappearing from parts of Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rewilding of New York's North Country: Beavers, Moose, Canines and the Adirondacks
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2008 The Rewilding of New York's North Country: Beavers, Moose, Canines and the Adirondacks Peter Aagaard The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Aagaard, Peter, "The Rewilding of New York's North Country: Beavers, Moose, Canines and the Adirondacks" (2008). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 1064. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1064 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE REWILDING OF NEW YORK‟S NORTH COUNTRY: BEAVERS, MOOSE, CANINES AND THE ADIRONDACKS By Peter Miles Aagaard Bachelor of Arts, State University of New York College at Geneseo, Geneseo, NY, 2005 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History The University of Montana Missoula, MT Spring 2008 Approved by: Dr. David A. Strobel, Dean Graduate School Dr. Dan Flores, Chair Department of History Dr. Jeffrey Wiltse Department of History Dr. Paul R. Krausman Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences ii Aagaard, Peter, M.A., May 2008 History The Rewilding of New York‟s North Country: Beavers, Moose, Canines, and the Adirondacks Chairperson: Dan Flores This project examines the restoration histories of beavers (Castor canadensis), moose (Alces alces americana), and wild canines (Canis spp.) within the Adirondack Highlands of northern New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Variations of the Digestive Tract of the Eurasian Beaver Castor Fiber
    This publication is made freely available under ______ __ open access. AUTHOR(S): TITLE: YEAR: Publisher citation: OpenAIR citation: Publisher copyright statement: This is the ______________________ version of an article originally published by ____________________________ in __________________________________________________________________________________________ (ISSN _________; eISSN __________). OpenAIR takedown statement: Section 6 of the “Repository policy for OpenAIR @ RGU” (available from http://www.rgu.ac.uk/staff-and-current- students/library/library-policies/repository-policies) provides guidance on the criteria under which RGU will consider withdrawing material from OpenAIR. If you believe that this item is subject to any of these criteria, or for any other reason should not be held on OpenAIR, then please contact [email protected] with the details of the item and the nature of your complaint. This publication is distributed under a CC ____________ license. ____________________________________________________ Mamm Res https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-017-0337-x ORIGINAL PAPER Seasonal variations of the digestive tract of the Eurasian beaver Castor fiber G. Bełżecki1 & R. Miltko1 & B. Kowalik1 & A. W. Demiaszkiewicz2 & J. Lachowicz2 & Z. Giżejewski3 & A. Obidziński4 & N. R. McEwan5 Received: 20 March 2017 /Accepted: 4 October 2017 # Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża, Poland 2017 Abstract Forage availability for wild rodents varies with sea- tract parameters of beavers varied based on the composition of son. In turn, the composition of food can affect morphometric available forage. parameters of the digestive tract. This study was performed in Eurasian beavers (Castor fiber) whose population was close to Keywords Digestive tract . Season . Beaver . Food extinction in most Eurasian countries, but has now increased.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Beaver (Castor Canadensis)
    Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Wildlife Notebook Series No. 24 North American Beaver (Castor canadensis) Beaver are thought to have once numbered 60-400 million throughout North America before European settlement. Prior to 1825, explorers in Utah noted beaver in abundance throughout the state. Highly prized for their lustrous pelts, beaver populations were decimated by fur trapping during the 1700s and 1800s to supply a worldwide demand for warm and fashionable accessories. By the end of the decade they were considered rare and in Utah, their harvest was closed in 1899. Beaver have since recolonized a large portion of their former range, however loss of habitat due largely to competing land uses, has severely limited populations in many areas through- out Utah. DESCRIPTION Beaver are the largest rodents in North America. Their soft pelts range in color from nearly black, brown, reddish brown to blonde. Adults can grow to over four feet in length and up to 60 pounds or more in weight. They can live to be 20 years old. The most distinctive feature of beaver is their broad paddle-like tail, which they use like a rudder to navigate their watery environment and to balance upon as they stand on their hind legs gnawing on trees and various woody plants they harvest and use for food. While generally clumsy on land, beaver are incredibly grace- ful in the water, where they use their webbed rear feet to propel them and their tail to steer. This large tail is also used as a defense mechanism. When beaver are threatened, they will slap their tail on the surface of the water to alert family members of potential danger and to startle potential preda- tors such as bears, bobcats or otters.
    [Show full text]
  • Ectoparasitic Insects Genera of Veterinary Importance and Some Aspects of Their Control
    American Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Vol. 4, No. 4, 2018, pp. 116-123 http://www.aiscience.org/journal/ajefm ISSN: 2381-6864 (Print); ISSN: 2381-6902 (Online) Ectoparasitic Insects Genera of Veterinary Importance and Some Aspects of Their Control Muhammad Sarwar 1, *, Arfa Rauf 2 1National Institute for Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering (NIBGE) , Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan 2Allied Hospital- Punjab Medical College, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan Abstract Agricultural animals (those used for production of food and fibre- livestock) and companion animals (pets such as dogs and cats) may be affected by arthropod pests. Insects as veterinary ectoparasites have a significant impact on the health, wellbeing and productivity of their animal vertebrate hosts. These impacts can be either direct, through tissue damage and blood loss, or indirect, through their role as vectors of viral, bacterial, protozoa and helminth pathogens. A second category of indirect effects are those that result from the alteration of host behaviour induced by arthropod attack and blood-feeding activity. So, the present article aims to contribute fundamental scientific knowledge in the areas of insects as veterinary ectoparasites and also the processes ensuring to the public for underlying the protection from biting and diseases borne. The insect ectoparasites include flies (Diptera), lice (Mallophaga), fleas (Siphonaptera) and bugs (Hemiptera). These insects have a profound impact on the health of animals by causing annoyance, inflicting bites and stings, and transmitting of diseases. Animals can be greatly annoyed by the presence and activity of certain insects. For example, cattle will bunch up and put their lowered heads together to seek relief when fly strike is severe; scratching may be symptoms of fleas or lice; and head shaking may indicate the presence of insects in ear.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaver Castor Canadensis
    Beaver Castor canadensis Other common names North American Beaver, Canadian Beaver Introduction The beaver (Castor canadensis) is New York’s official state mammal, and there happen to be a few family groups living in the Dyken Pond wetlands. Beavers are the second largest rodent in the world, only the capybara is larger, and they’re the largest rodent in North America. A semi- aquatic species, they spend time both on land and in the water. They’re also known as nature’s engineers and aquatic architects for their dam-building activities. Particularly industrious people are often described as being “busy as a beaver”. Physical Description and Anatomy Beavers are large, plump, aquatic rodents, with rounded ears. They are 40 – 52 inches (101.6 – 132 cm) long and anywhere from 22 – 75 lbs (10 – 34 kg). They have rich, dense fur, from yellow-brown to almost black. This made them a prime target for the fur trade when Europeans settled America. The fur is composed of two types of hair: long coarse outer hairs, and short fine inner hairs. This fur, combined with a thick layer of fat, provides insulation from cold temperatures. Their eyes have a second, transparent inner eyelid called a nictitating membrane that protects the eye while allowing them to see under water. Other adaptations to aquatic life include a valvular nose and ears that can be closed to keep out water, as well as flexible inner lips that close behind the large incisors, which allows them to carry sticks while swimming without swallowing water. They can make their fur water repellant using grease produced in their anal glands.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Paleobotanical Studies of the Early Eocene Okanagan (Okanogan) Highlands Floras of British Columbia, Canada and Washington, USA
    Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences A review of paleobotanical studies of the Early Eocene Okanagan (Okanogan) Highlands floras of British Columbia, Canada and Washington, USA. Journal: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Manuscript ID cjes-2015-0177.R1 Manuscript Type: Review Date Submitted by the Author: 02-Feb-2016 Complete List of Authors: Greenwood, David R.; Brandon University, Dept. of Biology Pigg, KathleenDraft B.; School of Life Sciences, Basinger, James F.; Dept of Geological Sciences DeVore, Melanie L.; Dept of Biological and Environmental Science, Keyword: Eocene, paleobotany, Okanagan Highlands, history, palynology https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjes-pubs Page 1 of 70 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 1 A review of paleobotanical studies of the Early Eocene Okanagan (Okanogan) 2 Highlands floras of British Columbia, Canada and Washington, USA. 3 4 David R. Greenwood, Kathleen B. Pigg, James F. Basinger, and Melanie L. DeVore 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Draft 12 David R. Greenwood , Department of Biology, Brandon University, J.R. Brodie Science 13 Centre, 270-18th Street, Brandon, MB R7A 6A9, Canada; 14 Kathleen B. Pigg , School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, PO Box 874501, 15 Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA [email protected]; 16 James F. Basinger , Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 17 Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2, Canada; 18 Melanie L. DeVore , Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences, Georgia 19 College & State University, 135 Herty Hall, Milledgeville, GA 31061 USA 20 21 22 23 Corresponding author: David R. Greenwood (email: [email protected]) 1 https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjes-pubs Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 2 of 70 24 A review of paleobotanical studies of the Early Eocene Okanagan (Okanogan) 25 Highlands floras of British Columbia, Canada and Washington, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Record of the Parasitic Beaver Beetle (Platypsyllus Castoris) (Coleoptera: Leiodidae) from Stavropol Territory (Russia)
    Available online at www.easletters.com Entomology and Applied Science ISSN No: 2349-2864 Letters, 2014, 1, 4:1-3 A new record of the parasitic beaver beetle (Platypsyllus Castoris) (Coleoptera: Leiodidae) from Stavropol Territory (Russia) S.V. Pushkin North Caucasian Federal University, Institute of Live Systems, Botany, Zoology and General Biology Department; 355009 (Stavropol), Russia Correspondence: [email protected] (Received: 12/8/14 ) (Accepted:2/10/14) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT Platypsyllus castoris Ritsema, 1869 previously noted only in Voronezh Region is found in Stavropol area (Russia) for the first time. This species was collected not on beaver, for which it was cited earlier, but on river otter ((Lutra lutra meridionalis (Ognev 1931)) – rare species of the North Caucasian region. Key words : Coleoptera, Leiodidae, Platypsyllus castoris , Stavropol area Russia. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION In 2013, the hairline Caucasian otter ((Lutra lutra meridionalis (Ognev, 1931)) collected near Budennovska, Pyatigorsk; Stavropol Krai (Kuban river) were collected 2 female beaver beetles Platypsyllus castoris Ritsema, 1869. This is the third discovery of this interesting parasitic insect with the European part of the former USSR, distant to the south for 300 km from the first [12] and about 100 from the second [1]. Particular interest is the fact that this is the second in the European part of the finding of this species parasitic on the otter, and not on traditional host – beaver. MATERIALS AND METHODS The material gathered the standard zoological methods. In total 2 females of a species are collected. 5 otters are examined. During researches any animal has not suffered. The account of number of an otter in territory of Stavropol territory is in passing spent.
    [Show full text]