Arxiv:1612.07895V1 [Physics.Space-Ph]

Home , Forbush decrease

arXiv:1612.07895v1 [physics.space-ph] 23 Dec 2016 @ ∗ aigitrcinrgo CR n CEaemain are ICME and (CIR) region interaction tating 1971 asdb nepaeaydsubne skona For- as known decrease is bush disturbances interplanetary by caused [email protected] author principle bev omcryflx( continuously flux which ray globe cosmic the observe around neutron This based (NMs) ground flux. monitors the ray through cosmic demonstrated be shock-sheath in can decrease with induce (MC)) heliosphere struc- cloud in field magnetic magnetic huge (ICME this of ture over propagation ahead ICME The shock-sheath of it. provokes speed of speed excess wind The solar Sun. ambient the of from place surface take the inter- (ICME) as ejection mass known of coronal structure emission planetary magnetic the coherent when large prominent very very becomes mod- The ulation (IMF). field magnetic interac- interplanetary its with from tion eventuate ray cosmic of modulation The RSNEO UBLN N REE OA TUTR IHNIC WITHIN STRUCTURE LOCAL ORDERED AND TURBULENT OF PRESENCE rpittpstuigL using 2018 typeset 29, Preprint March version Draft h nepaeaysaei le ihcsi rays. cosmic with filled is space interplanetary The .Tesde rnin eraei omcryflux ray cosmic in decrease transient sudden The ). ein ihnsokset oiflec omcryvrain uniq variations cosmic-ray th Keywords: influence suggests do explicitly study shock-sheath The within ICME. regions of Interpla substructures ordered (shock-s and the turbulent ICME within the the differentiate within could structures method 3D-hodogram local the A scale b shock-sheath. small has the of fl method within formation ray structures 3D-hodogram cosmic local multi-step the detail. of of in c the cause shock-sheath from the within profile recovery investigate FD of to deviation attempts this study explain structur could local sheath) the shock that and suggested they Further, ca Ragha model. this However, barrier by work shock-sheath. within recent recoveries and The shock-sheath decreases substructures, decrease. Forbush These two-step classical decrease. ejec flux mass ray coronal cosmic of F counterpart of interplanetary understanding of and structure model traditional The cosm time decrease. short Forbush evoke disturbances interplanetary transient The 1 nvriyDprmn fPyis nvriyo ubi Vi Mumbai, of University Physics, of Department University es&Demmelmair & Hess 1. CE hc-hah antccod(C,Csi a,Fruhd Forbush ray, Cosmic (MC), cloud magnetic Shock-sheath, ICME, tutrs turbulence. structures, INTRODUCTION A T E tl ATX .1.0 v. AASTeX6 style X ae2000 Cane 2 ninIsiueo emgeim e avl aiMumbai- Navi Panvel, New Geomagnetism, of Institute Indian uarShaikh Zubair T OTIUINI OBS DECREASE FORBUSH IN CONTRIBUTION ITS ; ( 1937 okode al. et Lockwood .Tecoro- The ). 1,2 Ai Raghav ,Anil ABSTRACT and u-tutrsie hc hahadM respectively MC and sheath ICME example shock (for different first by the caused i.e. are that steps sub-structures manifest second the profile and decrease step Forbush stud- of observational and ies model traditional two-step The 2011 Forbush 2016a ICME-associated al. in et Bhaskar drivers considered ( main are decrease the speed wind be mag- solar the to and Moreover, barrier field nature. netic in strong and whereas highly asymmetric non-recurrent, decrease, is Forbush decrease Forbush recur- induced weak ICME generates and CIR symmetric The rent, decrease. Forbush of drivers nyo h tutr fteIM u loo h ge- the on also but not ICME depends the of profiles structure FD the two-step on the only or one-step the n-tpo w-tpcsi a eraepol during ( profile decrease transit ray ICME cosmic two-step or one-step 1* h atsuiso obs eraeso either show decrease Forbush of studies past The yngr,Snarz() ubi409,India Mumbai-400098, (E), Santacruz dyanagari, nuhBhaskar Ankush , ; in(CE neednl otiue in contributes independently (ICME) tion ihrsne l 1996 al. et Richardson swti h CEssbsrcue(MC sub-structure ICME’s the within es o eepandb da shock-sheath ideal by explained be not n n antccod(C aietas manifest (MC) cloud magnetic and cryflxdces hc skonas known is which decrease flux ray ic ruhdces ugs httesub- the that suggest decrease orbush ta 21a a hw multi-step shown has (2016a) al et v eo ta.2001 al. et Belov eayMgei il IF regions (IMF) Field Magnetic netary ehduabgosysget the suggests unambiguously method et n vni C.Moreover, MC). in even and heath ahve al. et Raghav ttetruetadodrdIMF ordered and turbulent the at uely. xdces n hi respective their and decrease ux e tlzdt e oedetails more get to utilized een ae2000 Cane asclF.Teeoe present Therefore, FD. lassical 128 India. 410218, , b 2 ). ces,lclmagnetic local ecrease, ESOKSET AND SHOCK-SHEATH ME ; ( 2014 ihrsn&Cn 2010 Cane & Richardson ; ; rnaue l 2013 al. et Arunbabu ubvce l 2012 al. et Dumbovic ) oee,nt that note However, )). ). , ; 2 ometric location of the observer (Richardson & Cane detail. Thus, the main objective of the present study 2010). This can be explained as, one-step Forbush de- is to unravel the cause behind the multi-step Forbush crease profile is observed, if observer passes only through decrease and the recovery of cosmic ray flux within the the shock-sheath or MC (with weak shock-sheath) and shock-sheath region. two-step decrease, if the observer passes through both the regions. 2. DATA AND METHODOLOGY Wibberenz et al. (1998) has put forward the shock- To understand the cosmic ray’s response to the barrier model to understand contribution of the shock- shock-sheath region, we have analyzed two ICME in- sheath in Forbush decrease. This model considers the duced Forbush decrease events (amplitude ≥ 8%) oc- diffusion of cosmic rays across the propagating diffu- curred on September 17, 2000 and September 24, 1998 sive barrier. Therefore depression of cosmic ray flux is from catalog of Neutron Monitor Database (NMDB observed during shock-sheath transit across the Earth at www.nmdb.eu). The neutron flux data of 51 (Wibberenz et al. 1998). The one-step/gradual de- neutron monitor (NM) observatories are available at crease in cosmic ray flux is expected during complete nest2.nmdb.eu. However, of certain events, the data transit of shock-sheath region according to this model. from few laboratories are missing. We have used neu- However, observations demonstrate that one-step (corre- tron flux data (with 5 minute time resolution) retriev- sponding to small part of shock-sheath) or multi-step de- able at the above website for studying events. Each creases with respective recovery during its transit, which neutron monitor observatory has their local character- cannot be explain by this model. istics and baseline value of neutron flux. Therefore, we Interestingly, Jordan et al.(2011) has studied 233 normalized the neutron flux intensity of each observa- ICME events which could have produced two-step For- tory. The normalized percentage variation (%) of each bush decrease, but only 13 two-step Forbush decrease Neutron monitor observatory is defined as events were observed. Therefore, they proposed to dis- N(t) − Nmean card the classical two-step Forbush decrease model and Nnorm(t)= × 100 (1) suggested to consider the possible contribution of local Nmean small-scale magnetic structure within ICME in Forbush where, Nmean is averages of quiet day/days neutron decrease (Jordan et al. 2011). Moreover, Raghav et al flux of a specific observatory and N(t) is neutron flux (2016a), has summarized general features of Forbush de- at time t of the same specific observatory. We have crease profile (see in Figure 1) and proposed a new clas- classified neutron monitor data into three broad energy sification scheme for Forbush decrease phenomena. Fur- windows, (i) low rigidity ( 0-2 GV), (ii) Medium rigid- ther, they concluded that not only the sub-structures ity ( 2-4.5 GV ) and (iii) high rigidity ( ≥ 4.5 GV). (shock-sheath and MC), but also localized structures The presented data for each energy band is the average within the sub-structure have effective role in Forbush normalized neutron flux of all observatory comes under decrease profile (Raghav et al. 2016a). given energy band. To investigate the structure of the ICME (shock- sheath and magnetic cloud topology) of studied events, we have used one-minute and five-minute time resolution interplanetary data from OMNI database cdaweb.gsfc.nasa.gov. The Interplanetary param- eters include strength of IMF (Btotal) along with their components Bx , By , Bz in (nT), solar wind speed (km/s), plasma Temperature (K), proton density (n/cm3) and plasma beta. The boundaries of the shock-sheath and corresponding ICME magnetic cloud are obtained from the Richard- son et al. (2010) (Richardson & Cane 2010). The For- bush decrease onset is determined using visual inspec- Figure 1. General features of Forbush decrease profile during tion, where neutron flux starts to decrease sharply. ICME transit given in Raghav et al. (2016a). A 2D-hodogram method is used to visualize rotation/structures of IMF in space as well as in magne- In the light of the above discussion, it is important tospheric physics. The observation of semi/arc circular to study cosmic ray variations during shock-sheath and pattern in one of the planes, Bx −By or Bx −Bz or Bz − MC transit independently and further evaluate the in- By is a good indicator of rotational structures present fluence of the local structures within substructures in in interplanetary space (Khabarova et al. 2015, 2016). 3

However, temporal evolution or/and third IMF component contribution in magnetic structure cannot be studied using this 2D-hodogram method. Therefore, we have used 3D-hodogram method to effectively visualize the IMF configuration of different regions within the shock- sheath Raghav & Zubair (2016b). To make hodogram a one-second time resolution IMF data from ACE database www.srl.caltech.edu/ACE/ASC/level2/ is utilized.

3. OBSERVATIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS We have investigated two ICME shock-sheath regions to study the cause of cosmic ray flux decrease and their recovery within shock-sheath. The shock-sheath region transit corresponding to the ICME event occurred on September 17, 2000 (see Figure 2) exhibiting single step decrease following recovery in cosmic ray flux. Whereas, September 24, 1998 (see Figure 4) ICME shock-sheath transit demonstrate multi-step decreases & recoveries. For detail study, we have divided shock-sheath region into sub-parts depending on the cosmic ray flux variations. These sub-parts correspond to decreases and their respective recoveries in cosmic ray flux within the shock- sheath. We have used 3D-hodogram analysis technique Figure 2. Forbush decrease event occurred on September to investigate magnetic configuration of each sub-part 17, 2000. It has five panels, top most panel shows temporal variation of normalized neutron flux with their respec- of ICME shock-sheath. tive band of rigidities. The 2nd and 3rd panels show interplanetary magnetic field (BTotal & its BX -component) and 3.1. September 17, 2000 th (BY & BZ -component) respectively. The 4 panel shows so- The classical two step, simultaneous Forbush decrease lar wind speed & plasma beta data respectively. The bottom panel shows proton density and plasma temperature varia- event occurred on September 17, 2000 is shown in Fig- tion. The shock-sheath boundaries are shown with red verti- ure 2. The sudden sharp enhancement in IMF, so- cal dash lines. The four different regions of the shock-sheath lar wind speed and proton density indicate arrival of are separated by vertical dash lines. ICME’s shock at the Earth’s bow-shock (shown by the first vertical red dash line). The cosmic ray flux shows respond to the decrease and recovery of cosmic ray flux simultaneous gradual decrease accompanying with the within shock sheath. Whereas, third and fourth local onset of shock. The complete shock-sheath transit takes regions correspond to the decrease and recovery of cos- about ∼ 5 hours (region between two vertical red dash mic ray flux within MC. The boundaries of local regions line). However, the first step decrease is observed only are indicated by vertical dash lines which are shown in about ∼ 2.4 hours. During rest of the shock-sheath figure 2. Further 3D-hodogram have been constructed crossing, cosmic ray flux shows slow gradual recovery. for better visualization of the IMF configuration during These observations manifest that only front edge of the each local region crossing. shock-sheath (mostly shock-front) contributes in cosmic ray decrease whereas remaining shock-sheath leads to 3.1.1. Region 1 recovery. During crossing of local region 1, the total IMF shows Similarly, after the onset of MC, cosmic ray shows enhancement in total field strength. The all IMF com- gradual decrease for ∼ 3.8 hours. Moreover, during rest ponents shows fluctuations though-out the local region of the MC crossing, cosmic ray flux recovery is observed. 1 except for a small interval of time in which By and These observations suggest that the enhance interplane- Bz shows some rotation (see gray shaded strip in Fig- tary magnetic field strength contributes in decrease dur- ure 2). This could be ascribed as small magnetic is- ing the onset of MC. Whereas gradual decrease in IMF land (Khabarova et al. (2015, 2016); Raghav & Zubair strength give rise to the recovery of cosmic ray flux. (2016b)) formation within local region 1. The effective As note earlier, based on cosmic ray variations, we visualizations of these observations could be seen in Fig- have divided observed region in four local-regions (sub- ure 3. The left top hodogram clearly demonstrate that parts) for this event. First and second local regions cor- the initial (blue shade) and end part (red shade) of the 4

unambiguous evidence of rotating magnetic structure i.e. ICME flux-rope. These observations reveal that the turbulent region and/or enhanced magnetic field strength region could be responsible for cosmic ray flux decrease. 3.1.4. Region 4 The local region 4 is the part of MC, in which depicts gradual decrease in total IMF with small fluctuations. The solar wind speed, plasma density and temperature shows steady variations. The 3D-hodogram demonstrate the various arc planes which could be ascribed to rotational magnetic structure i.e. the feature of MC. The cosmic ray flux shows gradual and steady recovery which indicates that the magnetic ordered structure contributes in cosmic ray recovery.

Figure 3. Four hodograms of the four shock-sheath region as 3.2. September 24, 1998 shown in Fig.5. Each hodogram represents the 3D projection of magnetic field in Bz − By plane, where the component Bx The complex multi-step Forbush decrease event oc- represents in-out direction. Th colorbars shows the temporal curred on September 24, 1998, is shown in Figure 4. It variation of the four shock-sheath regions. the top left and shows two-step decrease in cosmic ray flux with recov- right hodogram are for region 1 and 2, while the bottom left and right is for the region 3 and 4 as shown in the Figure 2, ery within the shock-sheath region of ICME. The com- respectively. mencement of shock at the Earths bow-shock (shown by first vertical red dash line) can be identified by sudden region 1 is highly fluctuating. Moreover, only small time sharp enhancement in IMF, solar wind speed and proton interval (shown as sky-blue arc) is the evidence of mag- density. The complete shock-sheath transit takes about netic island formation. In-summary we conclude that 6.5 hours (region between two vertical red dash line). the high fluctuation in IMF is due to heating of shock- The cosmic ray flux starts decreasing well before the sheath plasma i.e. turbulence present in local region 1 commencement of the shock. This might be due to the could be the cause of cosmic ray decrease. enhanced magnetic field before the commencement of 3.1.2. Region 2 the shock. The effective visualization of IMF structure within the shock-sheath region is demonstrated using The total IMF shows gradual decrease followed by re- 3D-hodogram method. Figure 5 shows 3D-hodograms covery with small fluctuations in local region 2 shown for all the sub-regions of Figure 4. in Figure 2. Further, the IMF components Bx, By, and Bz show gradual variation with some fluctuations. Be- 3.2.1. Region 1 side this, the plasma temperature shows decrease during The total IMF, solar wind speed, plasma temperature, region 2 transit. Moreover, the right top hodogram of and plasma density is significantly enhanced which is Figure 3 clearly demonstrate the presence of various arc signature of compressed and heating nature in region planes. This distinctly indicates the existence of mag- 1. In region 1, a strong stochastic fluctuations are ob- netic island within the local region 2. These observa- served in total IMF and its components. This can also tions evince that the magnetic structure could be causal be clearly seen in top left hodogram in Figure5. The to cosmic ray flux recovery. hodogram illustrates that the front part of the region 1 3.1.3. Region 3 is highly fluctuating (see blue shed). These observations suggest that the front edge of shock sheath (shock-front) In region 3, total IMF and its all components show is highly turbulent and significantly contributing in cos- high fluctuations whereas, plasma temperature and mic ray flux decrease. solar wind speed depicts enhancement for about ∼ 1.7 hours. Further sudden increase/decrease in to- 3.2.2. Region 2 tal IMF strength/plasma temperature is observed fol- During region 2 transit, the total IMF shows steady lowed with steady and slow decrease. The left bottom slow decrease, while its components have smooth varia- hodogram also demonstrates high fluctuations followed tions. A clear orientated structure (rotational) is ob- with clear semi-circle structure. These observations im- served, especially in By and BZ components of the ply that the front edge of MC is highly fluctuating i.e. IMF. The proton density and plasma temperature in- turbulent. However, rest part of region 3 indicate the crease/decrease in this region, while the solar wind speed 5

Figure 5. Four hodograms of the four shock-sheath region as shown in Fig.4. Each hodogram represents the 3D projection of magnetic field in Bz − By plane, where the component Bx represents in-out direction. Th colorbars shows the temporal variation of the four shock-sheath regions. The top left and right hodogram are for region 1 and 2, while the bottom left Figure 4. Forbush decrease event occurred on Septenber and right is for the region 3 and 4 as shown in the Figure 4, 24, 1998. It has five panels, top most panel shows tempo- respectively. ral variation of normalized neutron flux with their respec- tended in local region 3. Interestingly, in local region 3 tive band of rigidities. The 2nd and 3rd panels show inter- IMF is steady (non-decreasing strength) and has down planetary magnetic field (BTotal & its BX -component) and th (BY & BZ -component) respectively. The 4 panel shows so- to dusk orientation. This is clear evidence of flux-rope lar wind speed & plasma beta data respectively. The bottom formation in shock-sheath region. The steady and dawn panel shows proton density and plasma temperature varia- to dusk oriented IMF in flux-rope (observed in region 3) tion. The shock-sheath boundaries are shown with red vertical dash lines. The four different region of the shock-sheath could be responsible for the slow and gradual decrease are separated by vertical dash lines. in cosmic ray due to diffusion process. 3.2.4. Region 4 shows slow gradual increase. All these observations can be interpreted as the formation of rotational structure Further, in local region 4, total IMF shows small en- within the shock-sheath region. The 3D-hodogram of hancement with steady variations, however, all its com- the local region 2, is represented at the top right in the ponents depicts small fluctuations superposed over the Figure 5. We can clearly observe the rotational struc- steady variations. The solar wind speed and plasma ture (semicircle) of the IMF in y-z plane. This rota- temperature shows steady variations while the proton tional structure/flux-rope within the local region 2 of density and plasma beta shows gradual enhancement fol- the ICME shock-sheath seems responsible for the ob- lowed with sudden decreases to its ambient value. The served recovery of cosmic ray flux. right bottom hodogram also depicts that the initial part of region 4 is fluctuating but rest of it shows oriented 3.2.3. Region 3 arc plane with different length. This region also has During second step decrease (i.e. local region 3), a similar rotational structure (flux-rope) as observed in steady variation in the total IMF and its components region 2 and 3 respectively except at the initial part i.e. BX and BY is observed, while the BZ shows small fluc- at the transition region between shock-sheath and MC. tuation. The plasma density, solar wind speed, plasma Moreover, during this transit, we have observed overall beta shows steady variation, whereas the plasma tem- gradual decrease in cosmic ray flux. The enhanced IMF perature decreases gradually with small fluctuations. field strength, along with the fluctuating IMF compo- The circle arc planes with different arc-length are ob- nents could result in observed cosmic ray flux decrease. served in the bottom left 3D-hodogram. Note that the 4. end part of region 2 has different arc length as compared DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION to that of initial part of region 3. However, the orien- The Forbush decrease phenomenon is interpreted on tation of these arc planes is similar. This indicate that the basis of diffusion of cosmic rays in convecting inter- the rotational structures in local region 2 may be ex- planetary magnetic field structures. These structures 6 generally consist of two broad sub-structures, shock- This study clearly demonstrates that (i) the random sheath and flux rope (MC). The shock-sheath is mainly fluctuations (i.e turbulence) and strength of IMF con- characterized by presence of stochastic fluctuations of tributes in the cosmic ray decrease, (ii) the ordered magnetic field, whereas MC is identified as an ordered structure with almost constant magnetic field partici- magnetic structure (Cane 2000; Richardson & Cane pates in cosmic ray flux decrease, (iii) the ordered struc- 2011; Raghav et al. 2014). In general, the first step ture with declining magnetic field strength contributes of forbush decrease is generally ascribed to shock-sheath in cosmic ray flux recovery. The generally accepted view and second one is to MC (Wibberenz et al. 1998; Cane is that the shock-front is turbulent due to plasma com- 2000; Arunbabu et al. 2013; Raghav et al. 2014). To pression and heating which results in cosmic ray flux be precise, the model given by Wibberenz et al. (1998), decrease. The presence of the ordered structure ( mag- which is based on diffusion of cosmic rays across the netic island/flux-rope) in the shock-sheath is intriguing propagating diffusive barrier, is widely used to explain and their origin is unclear at present. There exists an- cosmic ray decrease during shock-sheath crossing. The other possibility, that the ordered structure (magnetic one-step/gradual decrease in cosmic ray flux is the direct island/flux-rope) evolves in the later part of the shock- implication of this model. However, this model does not sheath region as a consequence of plasma relaxation pro- clarify the origin of multi-step decrease and/or recovery cess Taylor (1986). The shock-sheath plasma is not per- during shock-sheath transit. The one-step, the two-step fectly conductive due to the presence of turbulence and and the multi-step complex events have been reported hence, can reach to Taylor state (low potential energy) and suggests led to consider the contribution of local by forming magnetic island like structures within shock- structures within the sub-structures in Forbush decrease sheath. This newly evolved ordered structure within profile (Jordan et al. 2011; Raghav et al. 2016a). But, shock-sheath can contribute to recovery of cosmic ray Which part of the shock-sheath or MC contributes to flux. Further, as the MC reconnection with shock-sheath step/gradual decrease or/and in recovery of cosmic ray may give rise to turbulent conditions which is in tran- flux has remained as an open problem. Here, we have sition region, occurring between the sheath and MC. carried out detailed investigation of the local magnetic This process can be thought as follows: (i) Magnetic re- structures within shock-sheath region and their contri- connection give rise to electric field. (ii) Electric field bution in cosmic ray decrease and/or recovery. accelerates charged particles. (iii) Acceleration process increases the kinetic energy. Moreover, it should also increase the plasma temperature (Signature of this is evident in Figure 2). (iv) The net effect of this is the formation of turbulent region just before the MC. The possible visualization using artistic picture of ICME (shock- sheath and MC) and evolved magnetic structure within shock-sheath is shown in Figure 6. In summary, observations illustrate that the transition regions, which are in general turbulent, and the front edge of MC, with enhanced IMF strength contributes in cosmic ray decrease. Although, rest of the MC contributes in recovery of cosmic ray flux, due to the gradual decrease in magnetic field strength. It is also possible that as ICME travels in Figure 6. Schematic diagram of ICME evolution in inter- interplanetary space, it drags away the already present planetary space. magnetic island in solar wind. The shock-sheath mate- rial of ICME is then contaminated by these structures To address this issue, we have examined two large For- and, therefore, magnetic island might appear as a part bush decrease events occurred on September 17, 2000 of the ICME. These kind of structures may also origi- and September 24, 1998. The first event shows only nate from ICME-ICME, ICME-CIR, and/or ICME-solar one-step decrease with recovery and second event shows wind interactions. two-step decrease with respective recoveries within the To conclude, the study explicitly shows that turbulent shock-sheath region. The 3D-hodogram method used as well as ordered IMF regions do exist in shock-sheath in this work gave effective visualizations of magnetic region. These ordered and turbulent regions affect cos- configuration of the local structures formed within the mic ray flux variations distinctively. shock-sheath region. Moreover, this method explicitly differentiate the turbulent and ordered IMF configura- 5. tion. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 7

We acknowledge the NMDB database (www.nmdb.eu) making interplanetary data available. We are thankful founded under the European Union’s FP7 programme to Department of Physics (Autonomous), University of (contract no. 213007). We are also thankful to all Mumbai, for providing us facilities for fulﬁllment of this neutron monitor observatories listed on website. We work. Authors would also like to thank Aditi Upadhyay are thankful to CDAWeb and ACE science center for for their valuable English correction.

REFERENCES

Victor F. Hess & A. Demmelmair. World-wide Effect in Cosmic Raghav, A., Shaikh, Z., Bhaskar, A., Datar, G., & Vichare, G. Ray Intensity, as Observed during a Recent Magnetic (2016). Does Local Structure Within Shock-sheath and Magnetic Cloud Affects Cosmic Ray Decrease?. arXiv preprint Storm.Nature 140, 316-317 (21 August 1937) ; arXiv:1608.03772. DOI:10.1038/140316a0. Wibberenz, G., J. A. Le Roux, M. S. Potgieter, and J. W. Bieber H.V. Cane, 2000. Coronal Mass Ejection and Foubush (1998). Transient effects and disturbed conditions.Space Sci. decrease.Space Science Reviews.Space Science Reviews 93 : Rev., 83, 309-348. 55-77, 2000. Khabarova, O., Zank, G. P., Li, G., le Roux, J. A., Webb, G. M., Dosch, A., & Malandraki, O. E. (2015). Small-scale magnetic Arun Babu , H.N. Antia , S.R Dugad , S.K.Gupta , Y. Hayashi , islands in the solar wind and their role in particle acceleration. s.Kawakami , P.K. Mohanty , T. Nonaka , A. Oshima , P. i. dynamics of magnetic islands near the heliospheric current Subramanian. High rigidity forbush decreases: due to CMEs or sheet. The Astrophysical Journal, 808(2), 181. Shocks? Astronomy and Astrophysics manuscript A&A 555, Khabarova, O. V., Zank, G. P., Li, G., Malandraki, O. E., le Roux, J. A., & Webb, G. M. (2016). Small-scale Magnetic A139 (2013) DOI:10.1051/0004-6361/201220830 . Islands in the Solar Wind and Their Role in Particle Anil Raghav,Ankush Bhaskar, Ajay Lotekar,Geeta Vichare and Acceleration. II. Particle Energization inside Magnetically Virendra Yadav 2014. Quantitative Understanding Forbush Confined Cavities. The Astrophysical Journal, 827(2), 122. decrease drivers based on shock-only and CME-only models Raghav, Anil, and Zubair Shaikh. ”Cosmic ray acceleration via using global signature of February 14, 1978 event.JCAP magnetic reconnection of magnetic islands/flux-ropes.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.09628 (2016). 10(2014)074, DOI:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/10/074 . Belov, A., Eroshenko, E., Oleneva, V., Struminsky, A., Yanke, I.G. Richardson, & H.V. Cane, 2011. Galactic cosmic ray V., 2001. What determines the magnitude of forbush intensity response to interplanetry coronal mass ejection/ decreases? Advances in Space Research 27 (3), 625-630. magnetic clouds in 1995-2009. Solar Physics (2011) Dumbovic, M., Vrsnak, B., Calogovic, J., Zupan, R., 2012. 270:609-627 . DOI 10.1007/s11207-011-9774-x . Cosmic ray modulation by different types of solar wind disturbances. Astronomy and Astrophysics 538, 28. John A. Lockwood 1971.Forbush Decrease in Cosmic Radiation. Ankush Bhaskar, Geeta Vichare, K. P. Arunbabu, Anil Raghav . Space Science Reviews 12 (1971) ; 658-715 ; DOI Role of solar wind speed and interplanetary magnetic field 10.1007/BF00173346 during two-step Forbush decreases caused by Interplanetary I.G. Richardson, & H.V. Cane, 2010. Near-Earth Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections .Astrophysics and Space Science Coronal Mass Ejections During Solar Cycle 23 (1996 - 2009): (2016) 361: 242. doi:10.1007/s10509-016-2827-8 (2016). Ankush Bhaskar, Subramanian, Prasad and Vichare, Geeta. Catalog and Summary of Properties. Solar Phys (2010) 264: Relative contribution of the magnetic field barrier and solar 189237. DOI: 10.1007/s11207-010-9568-6. wind speed in ICME-associated Forbush decreases .The I.G.Richardson, G. Wibberenz and H.V. Cane.The Relationship Astrophysical Journal (2016) 828, 2, 104(2016). between recurring cosmic ray depressions and Co-rotating Jordan, A. P., H. E. Spence, J. B. Blake, and D. N. A. Shaul (2011), Revisiting two-step Forbush decreases, J. Geophys. solar wind streams at ≤ 1AU: IMP 8 and Helios 1 and 2 Res., 116, A11103, doi:10.1029/2011JA016791. anti-coincidence gaurd rate observations. Journal of JB Taylor, Relaxation and magnetic reconnection in plasmas. Geophysical Research, Vol.101,No.A6 , Pages 13483 - 13496, Reviews of Modern Physics, 58(3):741, 1986. June 1, 1996.